User talk:Onel5969/Archive 109

Archive 105

←

Archive 107

Archive 108

Archive 109

Archive 110

Archive 111

→

Archive 115

Archive 109: December 2022

Nomination of Tanque, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanque, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanque, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 05:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

The Lives of Winston Churchill and Alfred Milner

Original Research (OR): I reviewed the above article on OR and believe you may be mistaken. It is cited by 24 references and 35 footnotes, and wherever possible linked to the Internet Archive. Every bit of it is credible. Please refresh yourself with wikipedia's original research policy: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research My pseudonym: I am not related to Alfred Milner in any way, and the article shows no bias. We share the same last name, and if there is a family connection, is over two centuries old. Sincerely, Lord Milner (talk) 11:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Never claimed you had a COI, but there are numerous examples of WP:SYNTH. Just one example is the line about them both being workaholics. That may indeed be true, but I doubt either of the sources referenced states that both of them were. More likely one states Milner was and the other that Churchill was, and you've synthesized the conclusion that they both were. That's original research. And the article is full of examples like that. Further down in that section, there is a paragraph which starts out colleagues, which is both uncited, and again is full of SYNTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Under construction

Thanks for explaining your intervention and quick followup on Adam Clark Vroman. After your suggestion, I chose the Under construction template as better suited to what I anticipate will happen next. (This was sparked by my husband's indignation at A.C. Vroman not having a page in English besides his undeniably notable bookstore. On my part it was procrastination thinly disguised by an intellectual exercise: first use of the WP Translation tool in a mainspace article, first CS:EN translation via GoogleTranslate (as that pair isn't supported inside WP). Vroman the man does have well-established notability per his Wikidata item (with four dozen identifiers!). Some suggestions for further work are listed on the Talk page. A tribute to my former hometown, Los Angeles. Cheers! -- Deborahjay (talk) 13:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Ah, yes, I should have mentioned the under construction template as an alternative. But you'll need 3 references which go in-depth about him from independent, reliable sources to show he meets notability criteria. Also, I removed a few of the links you had in the External links section. If a site has an official website, then their social media sites should not also be included. When you're done, if you want me to take another look, feel free to ping me. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:29, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

🙄

I can't believe all the effort you put into throwing my translation work away instead of looking up… what, you wanted *one* more reference? That would've been easily found. But you clearly didn't even try. It honestly blows my mind how much time it seems to me you'd rather spend trying to delete stuff than actually help improve an article, which would have taken far less time. Anyway now we finally have an article — that is an actual contribution to Wikipedia. Thanks for nothing! Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

I have no idea what you're talking about. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to discuss Silver Crane

Good morning @Onel5969,

I would like to invite you to observe the Talk:Emilis_Vėlyvis#Silver_Crane_award_effect_on_notability discussion. Thank you, Sincerely yours, Tom Ttk371 (talk) 17:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

I already have. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Copyvio accusation on Bruno Platter

Good afternoon, I noticed that you redirected the article on Bruno Platter and copyvio-ed all of my revisions on the article. There was no plagiarism on the article and I actually reworded numerous phrases in the article (the original versions are probably more infringing than my revisions). IIRC, there were around 8 sources on said article spread throughout the article, many of them being used on other language Wikipedias. As such I believe that you are mistaken in claiming that these edits violated copyright. Knightoftheswords281 (talk) 22:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Actually, there was, which was checked by an admin, who revdel'd the edits. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

I have initiated a 3O (third opinion) request at Wikipedia:Third_opinion#Active_disagreements. Such request requires notification of discussion participants.

Thank you, Tom Ttk371 (talk) 10:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

TWD characters

Hello again Onel. Hope you are keeping well! I’ve noticed lately that there was quite a few articles created for minor characters in The Walking Dead recently e.g. Dante, who I can’t even remember. I think there are far too many articles already for TWD characters, and adding these insignificant, minor characters into the mix isn’t necessary imo. AfD??? The Optimistic One (talk) 23:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Always a pleasure. Don't know how successful an AfD would be. There are a concerted cadre of editors who will !vote keep just because they are fans of the show (and when I say, I'm saying regardless of which show the character is from). And you will always find references in trade magazines which deal with recaps of episodes. Like the Dante article you reference, the two best in-depth coverage, from Forbes.com and insider.com are non-reliable sources, and the other 3 are simply dealing with in-universe stuff. But I'm in the minority, I think. I like to look at WP as an actual encyclopedia, and not just another wiki. Personally, I don't think any fictional character should have an article unless there is scholarly academic material which goes in-depth about them. To me, the Dante article doesn't come close to showing real-world notability. No one's going to remember many, if any of the characters on TWD 20 years from now. Sorry, didn't mean to go on like that, but I made an attempt a couple of years ago to push back on some of these types of articles, and got weary of the struggle. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

I understand. And I used to be different where I used to see a benefit to having loads of articles for characters but now I see it differently. On my favourite TV series, I like to keep an eye on them from time to time, and improve them but when there are far too many like there is in TWD, I find it hard. It seems like every character has they’re very own article, makes it feel more like Wikia. The Optimistic One (talk) 11:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Just to let you know, Spencer Monroe's article has zero sources, so that should be redirected straight away. I would normally do it, but I’m on holidays at the moment. I’d say a good five or six other articles would be easily redirected if an AfD is created for them. I’ll try and do them when I get back. The Optimistic One (talk) 17:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I see another NPPer has marked Dante as reviewed. I've redirected Spencer Monroe for now. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kimball, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimball, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimball, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 03:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Candied carrots

I added an article from the LA Times "Glaze me a carrot" for the Glazed carrots article will that be ok for notability? Yaksmarrow (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

The two news articles definitely help, but you should find at least 1 more like them. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:59, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Lodz city VS Expo 2024

I don't understand why the Expo 2024 page would redirect to the Polish city of Lodz. There is no such event as Expo 2024.

Since I am unable to delete that redirect page, I simply removed the redirect. If you know how to do it, could you delete the Expo 2024 page? Cheers Nyoome

Hi Nyoome - it doesn't just direct to the city article, but to a specific section of that article, "Horticultural Expo 2029", which talks about Expo 2024. It does appear to be a viable redirect imho. However, if you disagree, you can always submit it to RfD; you can do that either using Twinkle, or follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#How to list a redirect for discussion. Hope that helps.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

Just wanted to say thank you for reviewing my articles from a while back.

Keep up the great work 👍

Thanks again, AverageFraud (talk) 11:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

College of Remote and Offshore Medicine

I saw you'd moved Draft:College of Remote and Offshore Medicine to draft space, with no comment or rationale. I had worked on the page and there seemed to be plenty of third party citations discussing the College and the courses it provides (in a positive light). Could you outline how you feel the article was not ready? Cheers, TMallinson (talk) 14:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Just left a message on your talk page, so please continue the discussion there. But there was both a comment and a rationale. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crime Ring (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Crime Ring (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Phoenix...It's dry heat...

I noted your amusing remark on the mythological bird. Have you read Edward Ormondroyd's David and the Phoenix? CerroFerro (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Actually, no, I hadn't heard of that. Wished I had known about it when my kids were children.... Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

At 68, I continue to read selected children's stories, out of literary curiosity. David and the Phoenix is available free online from Gutenburg: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27922/27922-h/27922-h.htm

The delightful illustrations by Joan Raysor are included. Best regards, --CerroFerro (talk) 18:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Centre Slush Puppie

You recently made a page I created, Centre Slush Puppie, into a redirect, citing notability guidelines. I would make the argument the page meets the guidelines, considering that every other Canadian Hockey League venue has an article. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 20:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

WP:OSE isn't really a valid argument. In order to show notability you need at least three in-depth references from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Your article had none, a press release and a link to the center's site. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Masters (TV series)

Hello, Onel5969, thank you for the review here. Though, personally I'm a bit unsure how this is notable though, the award nomination (not a win) seems fairly minor, whereas the other refs seem to be quite routine announcements, I also doubt that 1, 2, 3, 4 are RS, seems like celebrity gossipy sites with little editorial policies. If you found more sources, could you ping me so I can add a sources exist tag? Many thanks for your help! VickKiang (talk) 08:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. As always, feel free to unreview a page I've marked reviewed if you disagree (as long as you leave one of these lovely notes! ). I've marked it unreviewed. I will bow to your better understanding of the reliability of Indian sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Additional sources on Emilis Velyvis to support notability

Dear Onel5969,

I have added two additional references, one of them from yet a fourth independent, reliable, secondary source, a newspaper Kauno Diena. The new additions are not interviews. Now we have a total of three non-interviews from independent and reliable sources. I believe I must have eliminated your doubts about Emilis Velyvis' notability.

It is not impossible for me to reference the discussion on the Talk:Emilis_Vėlyvis#Silver_Crane_award_effect_on_notability as outlined in the Help:Maintenance_template_removal to remove the notability tag itself. To repeat, Wikipedia guidance on award notability states, The award may be presumed notable by meeting general notability guidelines when: 1) It is granted by a nation and the award is at the level of the highest and most prestigious awards that can be granted by that nation. Further, Wikipedia:Awards and accolades explains, Awards with their own article (e.g. Academy Award for Best Actor) are presumptively appropriate for inclusion, both for winners and often for nominees. The consensus of the award aspect discussion is, you disagree, I agree, and two other editors (David and Maxim) either agree or tend to agree.

But first, I feel indebted to ask you,

1) Will you object to me removing the notability tag?

2) Will you kindly yourself remove the notability tag?

The question of the effect of a national filmmaking industry award may and likely will remain open to decide on articles beyond Emilis Velyvis alone.

Thank you for your patient attention and participation to improve Wikipedia,

Yours, Tom Ttk371 (talk) 11:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Monica Cyrino

Hello Onel5969, I don't think that it is acceptable to repeatedly tag a Wikipedia page (Monica Cyrino) as not meeting notability criteria without explanation when this is clearly not a consensus issue. These tags are not constructive. It would be a better use of time to improve the page to demonstrate the subject's notability. How does the subject not meet the notability criteria? Thanks very much, Srsval (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I have no interest in the subject, therefore have no interest in working on it. The person may or may not be notable. Currently, they do not meet GNG standards. A claim that they pass WP:NACADEMIC is problematic. As they don't easily pass those standards either, as they do not meet any of the 7 criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Whitetail, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitetail, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitetail, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 03:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Ajigawa stable redirect

Just noticed you undid the page creation. No offense on this, just make sure to also delete the #redirect for disambiguation purposes (Ajigawa stable is no longer affiliated with Isegahama) OtharLuin (talk) 11:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

New section

Hi friends, why did you provide a verifiable "referral" or "citation needed" template? This page has many reference quotes from various different sources and the accuracy of the article can be trusted. There are approximately dozens of reference quotes that have been given in each paragraph. In your opinion, try to explain what is lacking and what quotations need to be corrected? KSDVictory980 (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

page Ngawi (town) KSDVictory980 (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Despite the numerous sources already in the article, there are quite a few uncited assertions still within it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Counties of Iran renovation in progress

I wanted to drop a real quick thank-you for reviewing the recent stub articles I created to help bring the neglected second-order administrative divisions of Iran into the light. I have a couple of years ahead of me to improve the other 450 counties and have made quite a bit of headway (and some head-scratching along the way). The Persian side of Wikipedia is in a very sad state, but I'm trying to get as much out of it as I can. The editors who would normally pay attention to the geography of Iran have other things on their mind right now, so I get it. Thanks again! Brightkingdom (talk) 01:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Reviews

Good evening from down under. Thanks for reviewing some of my articles. I noted you tagged Elijah Tsatas and Cameron Mackenzie for notability.

Please note I have removed these tags per WP:WTRMT 3 – template does not belong. Significant coverage in WP:RS is apparent through a basic Google search and so both players meet WP:GNG. Further, per WP:ATHLETE “people who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport” are notable. Subject are team members of Australia’s national football league which is the highest professional level.

While both had at least two RS included, I do concede I didn’t include all the coverage out there. Given the above, please will you consider re-reviewing them and marking as reviewed if comfortable doing so?

Thanks and good day!

MC MaxnaCarta (talk) 11:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Absolutely. With sports figures, my rule of thumb is 3 in-depth articles, for the most part. I've re-reviewed them now. Nice job. Would still like to see more sourcing for the Mackenzie article. And btw, thanks for all you do on the project, especially over at NPP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Three is definitely the better number @Onel5969 and I appreciate your execution of reviewing without fear or favour, which is exactly as it should be! I appreciate yours too! Mackenzie does need expansion. I think I was just keen to get the top draftees live so they clock up some views while their names are in the press. See you in the Discord soon 😃 MaxnaCarta (talk) 11:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please don't move these articles!

How do feel about delate articles of stations on Line 14 (Shenzhen Metro)? Why are you so obsessed with deletion? Where can I quote some articles? It just a page about a metro station, what effective links do you want me to find? Next time if you delete it, I will be angry！！！ Szabiao (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I really don't care about your lack of self-control. It's been explained to you several times now, what is needed for these articles to pass WP:GNG, which you refuse to understand. Simply source them properly. It's not up to me to tell you where to find sources. I couldn't care less about these insignificant articles, what I do care about is that any new article on WP pass notability criteria. Which these do not. They have been left up for days without you making any improvements. Now, unless you return to apologize for your personal attack, stay off my talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please don't move these articles!

Next time you delete it, you can get away from me!!! Szabiao (talk) 12:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Oopsie moment

Hello Onel5969, I just reviewed an article Sailesh Kolanu actually by mistake while tagging the place as orphan. I'm not sure if it passes the all the basis wiki criteria. It might be WP:TOOEARLY, not sure. Could you check it for me? Feel free to unreview it.

Also since I'm on my mobile, I kind of closed the curation tool by mistake. Do you know how can I get it back? Thank you! ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 17:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. If it is too early, it's not by much. But there's a much larger issue with the article, and that is that it is UPE/COI editing. I've moved it to draftspace. Regarding the curate tool, not sure on a mobile, as I nothing on my mobile. On the PC, you can minimize it, then simply click on it to re-open. If you close it all the way, a button appears on the left side, which says "Open Page Curation". Hope you can figure it out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969, Thank you for reply. I have figured out about the curation tool (ngl mobile it's tough finding things). Anyways I also need your opinion regarding these two "Indian actors" start articles which are reviewed. Could you see if [Manish Khanna] and [Shweta Gautam] could be draftified instead? Cheers!✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 06:14, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Well, first, according to current standards, they are too old to be draftified. In their current state, the latter has enough of those blurb type sources to meet GNG, and the former is borderline. However, they both clearly meet WP:NACTOR. So I think tagging them is warranted. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Henry Sy Sr. Hall (University of Santo Tomas)

Hi! I see that you redirected the page. But could you or could I publish it again? It's still underconstruction. I hope you'd give me more time. Thanks!Pampi1010 (talk) 18:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Would you like me to move it into draft so you can work on it? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:54, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes! Thank you! Pampi1010 (talk) 04:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Pampi1010 (talk) 07:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Hey take a look Nalla Samayam

Hi there @Onel5969,

I created a new article Nalla Samayam. As you review my new article, I request you to take a look to it. Thank you!! Ameer al safar (talk) 21:26, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Left Alliance

@Onel5969 Many items of information are derived from Wikipedia articles. I had given the links of the articles of wikipedia from where I derived the information like 2006 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election. Is there any need for giving citation of those items of information? I had added the information after verifying them from different articles of wikipedia and other resources. I did not add any speculative thing. I have added many citations and submitted it for review please check it. I am adding more citations if possible. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Here is the issue, the entire context of the article is WP:OR. While the article does talk about temporary alliances formed from time to time, my audit of the references did not show that there is a cohesive "Left Front" in India. There are regional organizations which use that name, but not one single overriding group, which is what the article suggests. I think you should follow Rosguill's advice, "While Left wing politics in India would be a notable topic, the article as written synthesizes a list of alliances without reference to any sources grouping these coalitions as a whole. I would recommend reorganizing this as a prose article about the history of the Left in India" I would recommend renaming the article something like History of left wing politics in India, or something similar, and talk about all the different alliances that have occurred throughout the years and in the different regions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

History of Left wing politics in India is very vast starting from about 1920. I have some books but how can I give citation from them? I did not write about All India Left Front. I wrote about different alliance of left parties in different states of India. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Please check it once again. I have added total 46 citations.(https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Alliances_formed_by_left_parties_in_different_states_of_India) XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation and notability

Hello @Onel5969,

I'd like to create an article on a 2018 Kosovar film, Nëntori i ftohtë. The English language title is Cold November. Coincidentally, an American film with the same title was released in March 2018, although it premiered in 2017 at the Woodstock Film Festival. On Rotten Tomatoes, IMDb, and a number of other "sources", it is listed as a 2017 film. Should we consider it as such? If not, how do I proceed with a disambiguation?

Thanks! Mooonswimmer 13:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Films go by date of first showing, so in this instance, (2017 film) as the dab would serve. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

FA Youth Cup Question.

Hello Onel5969. This is Logan Z Man 2022! I would like to ask why you keep reviewing the FA Youth Cup Articles as they are being added to daily. I appreciate you doing this, but give me a heads up next time. Also why does the 2019-2020 FA Youth Cup Page move to a redirect? Please respond as soon as possible. Sincerely, Logan Z Man 2022! Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 17:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm really not sure what you're talking about. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

I read that the articles have been reviewed. What does that mean as I'm sorta new here. Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Kartiki Gonsalves

Hi @Onel5969: I sent to Afd. Your G4 failed and I just happened to notice. scope_creep^Talk 10:11, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

YOU CANNOT DELETE MAGUNATIP!

The page is still in its infancy and it will be added more information soon, this is an important article for Malaysian culture! Tellisavas (talk) 15:56, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

That's irrelevant. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:07, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

The page has been edited by using original words. Tellisavas (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Music groups project template

Greetings. Articles about music bands are not part of the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force and do not need to be marked with {{WikiProject Music/Music genres task force}} template. Instead, it is more appropriate to specify the biography template with the parameter "musician-work-group=y". Thanks. Solidest (talk) 08:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. That was how was rating them, but another editor suggested this change, but will go back to the former. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

• Hello again. These two List of songs recorded by The Cranberries + List of UK top-ten albums in 2023 are also not supposed to belong to the genre project. I would suggest to use {{WikiProject Discographies}}, {{WikiProject Record Charts}}, {{WikiProject Lists}} instead. Solidest (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Battle of Las Trencheras

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Battle of Las Trencheras, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It would appear that https://www.ima-usa.com/, a commercial Militaria website has passed of at its own text that is in the public domain . Thank you. User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for letting me know. Where did you see that? When I checked, there was a copyright notice at the bottom of their page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Directly from the link @Shirt58 posted, On the bottom of the page directly reads "All Images and Text Copyright © 2003-2020 International Military Antiques Inc. All Rights Reserved." PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, however, "for works created after January 1, 1978, copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years." Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Mark Masselli notable

Good afternoon. Mark Masselli seemed to pass WP:BIO based on the number of secondary source mentions and similarity to work of other American health activists. Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Interested in your thoughts. Thank you. Opakapaka (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sweetwater, Pima County, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sweetwater, Pima County, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweetwater, Pima County, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 06:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rankin, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rankin, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rankin, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 06:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Communist Party

@Onel5969 In Communist Party of India (Marxist) article, there is an image of governments formed by CPI and CPIM. There is a mistake in this image. West Bengal and Tripura had chief ministers only from CPIM. Kerala had/has chief ministers from both CPI and CPIM. This image needs to be corrected. How to make it correct?XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi XYZ 250706. I would suggest you contact someone who actively edits that article, and post on its talk page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Section headers and layout / splitting article

Hello @Onel5969,

How would you reorganize this article? There are supposedly "too many section headers dividing up its content" since most of them are very short subsections with only 1-3 sentences. Would creating a few "region" subsections (Europe, Africa, Asia-Pacific) without additional country subsections be a good way to proceed? I would keep "United States" and "United Kingdom" as separate subsections due to the length of the paragraphs.

Also, could you take a look at Ashkali and Balkan Egyptians? Over a year ago, a contributor brought up the topic of creating a separate page for each ethnic group on the article's talk page, but nobody ever joined the discussion. Should I start a new discussion on the talk page and invite certain editors who might find an interest in the subject matter, or should I just proceed with making sure each ethnic group has its own page?

Thanks for your time! Mooonswimmer 13:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

In answer to your first question, that's easy. Simply convert each country into a bullet point, with any text below it. In other words, the countries become a list, instead of each one having its own subsection. Regarding your second questions, WP:BOLD would apply. It would be different if there were objections to the idea of splitting the article, but no one objected, so go for it.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

My new article Nalla Samayam

Hello @Onel5969

I know you are busy with works, sorry for the inconvinience, I created a new article Nalla Samayam and the article is still not marked as reviewed. As you are the one who reviewed my most articles I am pinging you.

I get short time from my job to edit in wikipedia and I love the time spending. So last time I created this even I was travelling and nobody marked reviewed yet, and expecting a review. Could you please take a look Nalla Samayam. Thank you.

Ameer al safar (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Evan Golden COI Address

Hello! I wanted to let you know that I have addressed the COI issue on Draft:Evan Golden (wrestler) and have submitted the article for review. Thank you for bringing the issue to light! Houseofblack19 (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of San Vicente, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Vicente, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Vicente, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

I just saw the notice that you reviewed Boy Fortune Hunters. Thank you for your hard work and dedication to Wikipedia. Karenthewriter (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Thank you, Clovermoss - getting to see my son for the first time in a year, so it's been a wonderful beginning to the season.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Secundino, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Secundino, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secundino, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 03:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Dobson, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dobson, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dobson, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 05:40, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quiet Council of Krakoa

The edits on the page was reverted by you on the basis of "Not nearly enough in-depth coverage to show any real world notability". Causing it to redirect to page of Krakoa. Can you explain me in detail why it was redirected? Nekivik (talk) 08:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Because it has zero real world notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Need to do a better job

Onel, yesterday you posted on my page that you moved the article Alaskan Creole people to drafts, directly after two months of it being public on Wikipedia and already having a considerable amount of good sourced material; the following quote is your reasoning why you moved it to drafts:

"I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive."

I recommend next time rather than being uncommunicative and timid about the perceived "disruption" of an article, that you either communicate effectively on the talk page of the article, boldly remove the unsourced content, or simply place a "citation needed" tag. You can't expect an editor to know what is in your mind nor have knowledge of your concerns if you choose to remain silent.

I responded to your post yesterday, to which you still haven't replied back to me yet:

All of the information in that article is from other articles in Wikipedia, so while you're putting that article into a draft, you should also move all the other articles that the information was copied from to draft space too as apparently they don't fit "veritability."

XXXXX

In regards to the information of the Alaskan Creole people article, the majority of its composition came particularly from the two articles Russian America & Promyshlenniki, with bits of information interspersed from Starozhily, Ninilchik, Alaska, and Kodiak, Alaska; there may be other articles i'm missing, but I don't have access anymore to the history of the Alaskan Creole people article to verify this.

I had the Administrator UtherSRG delete the Alaskan Creole people draft; your quick decision to move the article to a draft state indicated that the information within wasn't worth keeping public. I have also moved the two primary articles that composed the article, Russian America & Promyshlenniki to drafts so that you can do your job better and ensure that the information within them is worthy of public view. Aearthrise (talk) 14:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

So, the fact that I communicated to you is a lack of communication. Interesting. And difficult to respond to something when you didn't bother to ping me on your talk page. In the future, please familiarize yourself with WP:VERIFY. You also need to take a good look at WP:OWN. I recommend that you familiarize yourself with WP policies and procedures. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Why article called ,,Ustroń Polana railway station" is removed?

Tell me, why you remove the article called ,,Ustroń Polana railway station"? Is it normal?

I just created this article for knowledge.

Thank You GrandContimentalRailways (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. The same reason that was given to you when I draftified it. And the same reason that 10mmsocket left on your talk page. I see that you have at least one other article you recently created with the same issues, which will most likely be draftified shortly as well. WP:VERIFY, which has already been told to you, is the policy you should familiarize yourself with. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

ANI

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed_topic_ban_for_GrandContimentalRailways. Enough is enough IMHO. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Just saw this, and now the point appears moot, since they've been indeffed. Thanks for all you do on the project. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Harry C. Hindmarsh

I see that you placed a peacock tag on the new article I created about one of Canada's most influential journalists and newspaper executives. I removed a few words and I'm wondering if the tag can also be removed. Everything in this article is backed up with citations from reputable sources. I think it is no longer accurate to say that it promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Bwark (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes, you've done a nice job on the peacock terms, but phrases like "competitive instincts and talent for spotting, then publishing, powerful photos", "into one of Canada's most financially successful and politically influential daily newspapers", and "including his passion for social justice", should not be said in WP's voice. These types of praise and commentary need to be turned into neutral phrasing. For example, the first sentence should read something like, "Harry Comfort Hindmarsh (January 13, 1887 – December 20, 1956) was a reporter, editor and newspaper executive under whose leadership the Toronto star grew into one of the most financially successful newspapers in Canada." Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Obviously you have not reviewed the citations. For example, the phrasing "competitive instincts and talent for spotting, then publishing, powerful photos," is a paraphrase of one of my main sources, the noted Canadian journalist and popular historian, Pierre Berton. As an American, you may not have heard of him, but in Canada, he's considered an authority on Canadian journalism in the period when Harry Hindmarsh was an executive editor at the Star. And, as a retired journalism professor myself who taught the history of journalism at the University of King's College for 15 years, I know that this statement is accurate. Please check this citation for yourself to determine if the paraphrase of it "promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information." And before you check the citation, please consider your own subjectivity in determining what is and isn't "WP's voice." I would argue that Wikipedia articles require background to provide our readers with the context they need to understand complex subjects: https://archive.macleans.ca/article/1952/4/1/hindmarsh-of-the-star Bwark (talk) 00:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Obviously, you did not read what I wrote. It does not matter that those phrases are in the citations. They should not be used in an article as WP's voice. You are stating an opinion, however authoritative, as fact. Please see WP:WIKIVOICE. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback and guidance. I appreciate your efforts. I took your advice and reviewed, Wikipedia: Neutral Point of View. It is certainly helpful. I'm familiar with NPOV having worked for 20 years as an editor and reporter with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. NPOV was an obsession there. For example, CBC reporters were not allowed to use the words "I think" in on-air debriefs. "CBC reporters don't think, they just report the facts," our managers used to say. Fortunately, the policy has been relaxed a bit in the last decade and perhaps Wikipedia editors will learn to recognize informed reporting based on verifiable sources, especially when there's a consensus view. Yes, it's fine to report that under Harry Hindmarsh's leadership, the Toronto Star grew into one of the most financially successful newspapers in Canada. But what leadership did he provide to achieve that success? I notice that NPOV says explicitly that there are three fundamental principles and core content policies and all must be considered jointly to determine the type and quality of material acceptable in Wikipedia articles, and because they work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another. NPOV, verifiability and lack of original research. I'm guided by those principles in everything I contribute. I think it is a mistake to focus solely on words --- the so-called "peacock" ones you're calling me out on. The three principles work together and must be considered together. Let me just say in closing that I've been a contributor since 2007. I worked months on my first feature article on Harold Innis which became a Wikipedia featured article of the day. I had a lot of help from other editors, all of it encouraging and constructive. Nowadays, the help tends to be discouraging. Before December 7th, Wikipedia had no entry on Harry C. Hindmarsh. I created one and ever since, I've been dealing with criticisms. First the big conflict over the public domain photo (So far, I've prevailed) and now the peacock tag that appeared with no consultation undermining the credibility of my work on this new article. I had been planning to expand the entry, but now, I'm not so sure my work would be welcomed. Bwark (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Seasons greetings

Ohara Shoson (Koson), Egrets in Snow, Ohara Koson, 1927	Have a wonderful holiday season filled with peace, joy, prosperity and wonder.
	Hi Onel5969, Thank you for all your contributions during the year. I've learned a lot by observing your work at NPP/AFC; speaking from the standpoint of a new patroller I am deeply grateful for what you do - there is a lot to learn! May your 2023 be filled with creativity and good health. Image: Egrets in Snow, Ohara Koson, 1927 Netherzone (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words, Netherzone, much appreciated. And right back at you.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Draft:The Wisdom Bridge

Hi Onel5969 (talk · contribs). Thanks again for reviewing this article and other articles of mine in last few days. However, as guided by you I have added more references from secondary sources to this article to improve the notability as per Wikipedia guidelines. Kindly review it and guide me to move it to main space. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Nice job on the revision. I removed two additional sentences which weren't appropriate for an encyclopedia article and approved it to mainspace. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Redirecting 2023 Call of duty season to CDL page

I don’t understand the reasoning. This season is still in the beginning of the year, to delete everything seems pointless. Each season has had a page and users update as the season progresses. Disappointed that the call of duty league fans can’t actively add to the page Mundy Swoosh (talk) 17:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

To have an article on WP, two basic criteria must be met, WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY. This article meets neither. Most likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Enid, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enid, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enid, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 03:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Requesting reviews of the two articles I created.

Bernhard Mettenleiter and Wilson G. Smith, two composers of the past. Thank you in advance. Komitsuki (talk) 05:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Christian Presbyterian Church of Portugal

@Onel5969 Hi! You reverted some edits on Christian Presbyterian Church of Portugal, making the article a redirect again. However, the article was created with much greater content than the mention of the name in the article to which the redirect leads, with sources and based on the Wikipedia article in Portuguese. Did I do something wrong by turning the redirect into an article with this content? Thanks in advance for the clarifications! Daniel Silva Mendanha (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. There was an AfD discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Presbyterian Church in Portugal, which resulted in the consensus to merge to the target article, which was done. From a technical aspect, there was nothing wrong with the article you wrote. However, there was not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show notability. I hope this makes sense to you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reviewing my first wiki page on the Lead Plaque of Magliano. Please do let me know if you have any suggestions. And omg, thanks for all the work you clearly do for wiki. I was impressed by your statements under 'thoughts'--very much my point of view.Johundhar (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Oak Wells, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oak Wells, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Wells, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Price, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Price, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Price, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Hanukkah!

Already had latkas. Maybe I should get jelly donuts next. Holiday is almost over! What have you been doing? BostonMensa (talk) 13:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Love latkas... if you like those and jelly donuts you might try apple fritters... my grandmother used to make them and sprinkle them with sugar. Yum. Hope you're enjoying Hanukkah, what 4 candles burning today? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

December songs

happy new year

Thank you for your wishes for the season, - best wishes for you and yours! My card is in the making. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:46, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much Gerda, and as always, appreciation for all you do on the project. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! - Today, pictured, the soprano of our choral concert of the year. More in the context: User talk:Gerda Arendt#DYK for Talia Or, in case of interest. - the card --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Joker Out

FOR THE LAST (sorry for swearing) MOTHERFUKCING TIME, PARICIPATING IN EUROVISION MAKES A BAND NOTABLE. Blind Channel ARE NOTABLE BECAUSE OF THEIR EUROVISION PARTICIPATION!!! Ricciardo Best (talk) 14:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

For the last time... no it does not. As just shown in a recent AfD. Please familiarize yourself with WP guidelines. And not sure why you are posting this on my page, can't see that I've ever edited that page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Which AFD? Don't tell me it's the Karina Ignatyan one. That's JUNIOR Eurovision, which has much less coverage than adult Eurovision. Also, I was only using Blind Channel as an example for a notable Eurovision participant. If they are notable, Joker Out are notable too. --Ricciardo Best (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

If they are notable, find the in-depth sourcing required by GNG to show that they are. Participation in Eurovision is not an automatic notability guideline. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Simon & Schuster Mary Higgins Clark Award

Hello there! Could you explain why you added a Notability tag to the Simon & Schuster Mary Higgins Clark Award page? 5/13 of the sources cited are from reliable secondary sources. Significa liberdade (talk) 15:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Not sure which 5/13 you are speaking about, since there are 34 citations. However, none of them appear to go in-depth about the awards, simply being listings and mentions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:06, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Because this is the page for an award, it doesn't make sense that the majority of the sources would need to go in-depth about the award. Rather, they discuss the award winners in any given year. If articles cannot be found that go in-depth about the MHC Award, would you suggest moving the full award page to the Edgar Awards page, which has significant coverage? Significa liberdade (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes, just because something exists does not make it notable. I think it may be notable, but currently does not have enough in-depth sourcing to show it, and couldn't find them myself, nor do I have the time to put into searching for them. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Christmas to you

	Merry Christmas, Onel5969
	or whatever else you may celebrate at this time of year. Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia throughout the year and may 2023 prove to be a happy and successful year for you and your family Josey Wales Parley 20:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much, Joseywales1961 - the same to you and yours.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your suggestions about Mohammad Boroughani article

Hello! Thank you for your feedback on this article. I created this page because Amnesty International warned that Mohammad Boroughani execution was imminent, and I have now revised it to meet your concerns and comply with Wikipedia principles. Please let me know if you believe the issues have been adequately addressed or how I can address it better. Thank you for your help. Women-life-liberty-revolution (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Sarrail (talk) 00:33, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

I don't think we've met before, but greetings! Sarrail (talk) 00:34, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

I do not think we have either. Which is always a marvel to me when I *meet* someone knew on WP. Hope you have a glorious holiday season and an incredible New Year. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your copyright question

I have some real life issues taking my time and will be on a wiki break. I won't be able to follow up on your copyright question on the nhrp property. Perhaps you can ask at WT:CP. -- Whpq (talk) 02:26, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, and hopefully they are good real life things you are involved with. Take care and thanks for all your help and efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Has this been taken care of or do you still need me to have a look? And Merry Christmas too! -- Whpq (talk) 18:46, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Hope all is well, and yes, Talk:Jeremiah Vandyke House still needs to be looked at. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:51, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

I've replied on the article talk page. I'm off to do some Christmassy things so probably won't be able to follow up for some time. Cheers. -- Whpq (talk) 19:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you as always. And oh, my, is that article now a mess, full of original research. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for always being an attentive, fair, and helpful NPP. I value and admire how carefully you review. Merry Christmas to you! MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

(Or Happy Hanukkah!) MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

With me it could be either, but I've celebrated Christmas for many a year. Very impressed with your progress. Keep it up. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

The 12 Days of Wikipedia On the 12th day of Christmas Jimbo sent to me 12 BLPs 11 RFAs 10 New Users 9 Barnstars 8 Admins Blocking 7 Socks Socking 6 Clerks Clerking 5 Check Users Checking 4 Oversighters Hiding 3 GAs 2 Did You Knows and an ARB in a pear tree. -May your holiday season be filled with joy, laughter and good health.--– robertsky (talk) 07:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC) This message was generated using {{subst: The 12 Days of Wikipedia}}

🎶Hark! The herald angels sing, "Your article has been NPP-ed" Cheers!– robertsky (talk) 07:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Very cute, Robertsky. Hope you're having a wonderful holiday! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Leyden Publishing

Hi Onel5969

I do not understand the "Multiple issues" you have just placed on this article

1. A. Notability issues. Surely a publishing house that has products in just about every primary school in Australia is notable?
2. B. This is not a biography, though it does have a few biographical details on the founder, explaining why he set up the publishing company and how he operated it.
3. C. Of 22 references given, I see only 2 that are primary,namely [8,15]. These are hard to avoid. To what do you refer?
4. D. Which of these references is "not reliable"? Worldcat and National Library are references very commonly used throughout wikipedia and regarded as highly reliable.

Redabyss1 (talk) 12:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Fact one is irrelevant. What establishes notability is in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Of which the article had none, from what I remember. I tagged it with both company and bio, since the lead is for a bio of the individual, but the article is about the company, and while I thought you probably were writing an article about the company, I was not quite positive. It's okay to have info on people involved with the company, but they should be down in the body of the article, usually in a section regarding the founding, or in a "Founder(s)" section. Regarding C, you're correct in your assessment of primary sources, but those are the only two which go somewhat in-depth about the company. Regarding D, using another Wiki is not a reliable source. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Marvel oversized hardcovers

Hi...I was made aware of this issue last night. Apologies as this was my first Wikipedia article, and I definitely dropped the ball on including citations. I'm curious as to your thoughts on how much citation would be appropriate for an article like this? I've added several citations (including supporting images) for the intro paragraphs, but most of the page consists of a table of approximately 600 books. Do those all need individual citations? They do all have ISBN numbers which should allow them to be looked up by any user. Anyway...I appreciate your time reviewing the article in the first place. I hope you have a happy holiday season! Jjreader545 (talk) 17:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Actually, I think there are enough citations there as per WP:VERIFY. Where the issue lies is with the in-depth coverage to show that this is notable. You need at least 3 in-depth sources from independent, reliable, secondary sources. It's a very well-structured article, but it lacks those in-depth sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Appreciate the feedback! I've tried to include more secondary sources on my draft version and submitted it for review. I'm hopeful that will move it closer to establishing notability. Jjreader545 (talk) 14:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas
	Merry Christmas for you too, my friend! ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, my friend. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}}

Donner60 (talk) 02:32, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

P.S-Thanks for reviewing my article :D Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 09:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you as well. And you're welcome. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:58, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Giani Harpreet Singh

Hi, not questioning that the author does have a COI, and I have nothing to do with the article, but just for my edification could you explain your comment about an obvious link to the subject? I am not seeing it, but I don't usually swim in these waters. Just wondering what it is that I am not seeing. Elinruby (talk) 13:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Reviewers don't really publish what we look for when reviewing that gives us a clue to UPE/COI. That only helps those editors get around our reviews. And I'm not the most adept at uncovering UPE/COI, it has to be pretty blatant for me to see it, there are other reviewers much better than I at recognizing it. However, would be more than happy to share with such an experienced editor off-wiki, if you email me. Oh, and Merry Christmas! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Undraftifying NER Class Z

Hello, I’m Ilovejames5. You might not be pleased about this, but I have undraftified [[NER Class Z] since there are articles with less citations yet they aren’t draftified. Sorry about messing with you (especially during Christmas).Ilovejames5 16:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Not sure how they can have less, since there is only a single one in this article. And not a single footnote. Currently, it does not meet notability criteria. But no worries, about undraftifying, which was done so you could work on it uninterupted. But if it isn't corrected it'll probably end up at AfD. And Merry Christmas to you as well. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Actually, some has literally none (like the class B15s) Ilovejames5 04:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

I am currently working on a table of all locomotives (yes, literally all) with the source from BRDatabase in my sandbox Ilovejames5 05:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much. Same to you! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Hope you had the Merriest!

You have helped so many besides myself! Thank you! Joan arden murray (talk) 21:31, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023!

Hello Onel5969, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023. Happy editing, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, –Davey2010Talk 12:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

• Somehow I managed to miss the greeting you sent me so my sincere apologies for that, I hope you and yours had a wonderful Christmas Onel and I hope you all have a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year, Warmest Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 12:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

No worries. Merry Christmas to you as well. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

You unpublished the article.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:ATM622#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Jack_Mizzi_has_been_accepted. Shows that it was accepted. ATM622 (talk) 13:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

You unpublished my article

Please not that this article was accepted as per:

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:ATM622#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Jack_Mizzi_has_been_accepted ATM622 (talk) 13:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

A slightly belated Merry Christmas to you and your family! Kj cheetham (talk) 13:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Merry Christmas to you as well! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Not sure why you moved an article to Draft without following good practice

Please read WP:DRAFTIFY. "As a matter of good practice, the editor moving a page to draft should mark its talk page with the tags of any relevant projects as a means of soliciting improvements from interested editors." Yet, you left the talk page completely blank. Please follow good practice. JasonMacker (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Have no idea what you're talking about, but if it is Draft:2022 China-Arab States Summit, the talk page already had the pertinent projects. I suggest you take your own advice. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

"the talk page already had the pertinent projects." You seem to be confused. You may want to look at who put those project tags in place, as well as when they were added. Spoiler: it was me, after I noticed you failed to follow good practice. Not sure what "advice" you suggest I take, considering that it was you that did not follow good practice on WP:DRAFTIFY, not me, leaving me to have to clean up your mess. JasonMacker (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Notability

Hello. You made this edit and this edit to a pair of new articles, extracted from a parent article. I’m trying to add sources to show notability but having read WP:SIRS, I’m a little unsure about a couple of things. Do news articles count as secondary sources for this purpose? For example, I added this bit about an operation where troops from the unit were involved and are mentioned including some words attributed to a spokesperson. The reporting organisation is ARY TV, which I assume is a good source. The thing is, how much depth does it have to go into? Also, is there a minimum number of such sources before we can safely say notability is demonstrated? Sorry for bombarding you with questions. Gedrose (talk) 18:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Good faith questions are never a bother. But there are several issues with what you are asking. References can be broken down into lots of different categories depending on what you are talking about. E.g. what's a primary, secondary or tertiary source; what's independent or not, etc. Then there are also what sources can be used for. For example, you can use certain primary sources to satisfy WP:VERIFY, but not to satisfy WP:NOTABILITY. Having said all that, to get to your questions, news articles can be either primary or secondary sources, but are usually considered secondary sources by most editors. The source you listed, however, since it is really quoting a spokesperson is a primary source, so you could use it to verify something, but does not really go to notability. Regarding Ary News, there hasn't been a discussion on whether or not the source is reliable, but I do not see anything in this article to suggest they may not be. A rule of thumb is that if an article talks about a subject in-depth for three or more paragraphs, than that's in-depth. Sometimes two paragraphs is enough. A single paragraph is little more than a blurb. It also depends on the source. Something from the Wall Street Journal counts more than something from Scream. Also, it can also depend on what is being covered. Certain Indian newspapers are considered reliable for some things, but are unreliable for anything to do with entertainment. And finally, a safe bet is to have at least 3 in-depth references from independent, secondary, reliable sources to show that something is notable. And that's one of the longest responses I've ever written. . Hope it helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the detailed reply. I can see it will be a case of looking at each reference individually. Please keep up the good work. It’s highly encouraging to find my brief efforts at articles are being reviewed. ☺️ Gedrose (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Eureka rebellion

You might like to know that I've started a thread on the Eureka Rebellion page about my proposed sub-articles if you'd like to comment.

Robbiegibbons (talk) 06:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quiet Council of Krakoa

As per wikipedia, if there is a discussion on talk page, you can't remove all the information without participating or giving correct reason on talk page. Nekivik (talk) 04:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Revert ?

Check this please and don't revert it again. Alaney2k didn't revert it because it's right. Check Hamilton Tigers where it is written "A namesake amateur team existed prior to and during the NHL team's existence, and a minor league professional team named the Hamilton Tigers existed from 1926 to 1930." I will revert you last revert because you are wrong. But if you prefer have false redirect, I will let you doing it and never coming back on this article. Your choice to have poor redirect...

And for your information, I'm sysop on fr.wiki so I know what are GNG. Supertoff (talk) 11:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

A last thing : Hamilton Tigers where disbanded in 1925, Hamilton Tigers (CPHL) where created as a new team in 1926 in Canadian Professional Hockey League. Same name but not same team. The redirect is a non-sense. Bye. Supertoff (talk) 11:59, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Well, you obviously do not know what GNG is, since you keep restoring an article which clearly does not meet it. The article clearly states they were a member of the league I redirected to, and they are listed in that article. So clearly, you might not have a good understanding of what a redirect does. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Now i've nominated the Hamilton Tigers (CPHL) to AFD, because it fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:NTEAM, can you take a look around again and make sure the deletion nomination subpage should be created. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:A578:6010:913C:51E3 (talk) 13:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

"you obviously do not know what GNG is" : you surely are right cause I'm user since 2006 LOL. Do you really think an old user and sysop (but not in english wikipedia) don't know that ? So ridiculous... In fact, I don't care if this article stay or not. The redirect is just a non-sense because it's not the same team, but you don't want to accept it because you know all and you are right (of course)... I created an article with this redirect because it's just wrong. Deleted it is also right, but let the redirect is wrong. Now I let you with it, not my problem because I don't understand rules (LOL again). Supertoff (talk) 13:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

You can say what you want about your knowledge, and breadth of service, but your actions indicate otherwise. So glad you admit your ignorance. lol. Now, unless you have something actually constructive to say, please stay off my talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Prometejs

Hi, please review Draft:Prometejs. Thanks --Czalex 17:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Reginald the Vampire

You did not add a reason in the AfC template for why draft isn't ready for the article space. Please provide a valid reason or I'l move it back. Xeditboy (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

I did on the article creator's talk page, as per policy. You can find it at User talk:SecondLooneyaccount. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

FA Youth Cup Section

Hello again. This is Logan Z Man 2022!, here to ask why did you revert the 2020-2021 FA Youth Cup page back to the previous state? Bored0stiff and I were working hard to make that page as up-to-date as it was. You could at least tell both of us ahead of time. Any real reason for that and is it okay if I take back the revision to what Bored0stiff had so we can work on the 2020-2021 FA Youth Cup Page? Please respond as soon as possible. Sincerely,

Logan Z Man 2022! Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 21:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. The article had been tagged for almost a week saying it needed more sources, without any improvement. If you would like, I can move it into draft so you can work on it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes. Can you please move it into a draft so it can be worked on? I would like that. Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Done. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 22:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

No worries. Ping me if you'd like me to take a look at it when you're done. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Casa del Oro, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casa del Oro, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casa del Oro, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Laguna, Pinal County, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laguna, Pinal County, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laguna, Pinal County, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Page creation

Hello and thank you for your input. I do appreciate as I am working very hard to create and also edit current and future documents. Any advice would help me from an experienced user like yourself. I appreciate any and all suggestions. Thanks again Sportscanada 04:15, 30 December 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportscanadabox (talk • contribs)

Pendal Group

Obviously you have formed the opinion that Pendal Group is not notable enough to article which you are well within your rights to do. But as the article has been created on two occasions and edited by a few more editors, appears not clear cut. Per WP:BRD, I have thus reinstated. The subject is one of the 200 largest in Australia with assets of over USD70 billion, not just a [John H. Norton and Company Store|small time corner store]]. That it has been the subject of articles from six separate news organisations does demonstrate a reasonably broad coverage compared to an article largely relying on one government application form. If you still feel it is still not notable, please initiate an AfD. Lincollease (talk) 06:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Peter Lebeck

Hi, I've left an argument regarding the WP:BIO notice you left on the Peter Lebeck article. I'd appreciate it if you took a look when you got the chance! MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!_{(talk or whatever)} 08:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Why Mohamed Elhusseini moved from main space after accepted !

Why Mohamed Elhusseini moved from main space after accepted ! Ahmedemad665 (talk) 13:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Because you have a WP:UPE or WP:COI which needs to be addressed. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

OSH Literacy.

Hello, please can you inform me why the page 'OSH literacy' submission has been rejected, please? OSH Literacy is a recognised life skill literacy by most international safety, health and education institutions. We are an NGO that advocates for its inclusion in schools. I do not understand how it can be rejected. 2A02:9B0:8010:2187:1735:92A6:9FBF:92EC (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Hi. It is end of the year and I would like to give this to you as thanks for all the contributions you have provided as article reviewer so far. Imcdc (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Keep up the good work on those financial articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Notability of Champions Chess Tour

I thought that DAB pages/set index articles don't really have the same notability rules as actual articles? The point is just so that when people type that in or links are made to it, people can be pointed to the right article (Champions Chess Tour 2021 or Champions Chess Tour 2022). Endwise (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

You're correct, although I'm not sure it's an SIA. It looks like a stub article, with an SIA tag. Although, admittedly, it's really a grey area. Feel free to remove the tag if you disagree. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't really know if it should be a disambiguation page, set index article, or an actual article (as a stub now); I have no experience with this. I just put the set index tag because I was more or less copying how the Nord Stream article was formatted. Should I just remove the extra line of information with the source, or? Endwise (talk) 23:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

You know, I'm not really sure. There are pages for each of the years, so having an overall article about the annual event makes sense, but then it would need more sourcing. SIA's, to be frank, have always seemed confusing to me. I mean, in essence, I understand them, and I can see that they have some difference from, and yet in some instances some overlap with, dab pages. You might ask a question at Teahouse, or on the project page on how to handle this. Sorry, wish I could be more help. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:15, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your help anyway. I think I'll ask a question at the help desk. Endwise (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

INDEXED TALK PAGE

Hello! Onel5969 ^{TT me hope youre doing fine. First of all I would like to thank and appreciate all the imput you're making to expand and clean WP. Within 2 days, 7 of 15 new pages I created were reviewed by you. You're awesome. BUT after one of the pages Joseph Marwa (actor) was reviewed, it's talk page (Talk:Joseph Marwa (actor)) popped up on search engines leaving the main article unindexed, unlikely the other 6 reviewed articles. I didn't know if that was normal or I've done the right thing taking a step to ask. HAVE A NEW YEAR EVE ANUwrites 17:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)}

Hi. Thanks for the complement. Not sure what's going on with the indexing, that's not something I'm very conversant in. If it persists, you might ask a question at the Teahouse. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Onel5969!

Happy New Year!

Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 18:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Same to you! Happy New Year! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 18:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wingfield, Arizona

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wingfield, Arizona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vahurzpu (talk) 19:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)