User:TFOWR/Dashboard
| TFOWR · talkpage · dashboard · sandbox · monobook.js · monobook.css · sub-pages | WP:AIV · WP:RFPP · WP:SPI · WP:AN · WP:ANI |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 2a00:23c7:80a3:6701:8323:4f4:4f74:c350 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- MotorsportsGod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- GD234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 49.196.39.180 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2400:9800:291:2BFD:81FD:88E4:94EB:E3C2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Indonesia-based IP resumed disruptive edits on George Town, Penang article after the article had been semi-protected, identical to 2400:9800:200:43D4:90D1:F6A2:D18B:58F1, in complete disregard to a discussion started in the talk page. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Partially blocked. 2400:9800:200:0:0:0:0:0/40 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) for two weeks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2803:6000:E007:B44:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) Vandalism-only IP range, also block evasion of 2803:6000:E007:B96:0:0:0:0/64. Magitroopa (talk) 08:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 176.193.145.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. The last warning was 6 days ago, since then they have made 6 more disruptive edits. Annh07 (talk) 08:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mujahidhussain44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Spam only. Annh07 (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 196.157.8.43 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Wikipedia:Published (diff): account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. per [1]. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neyxtou (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Neyxtou: account is being used only for promotional purposes. This user created their own article about themselves which is discouraged on Wikipedia. Royiswariii Talk! 10:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 3 |
| Empty articles | 1 |
| Nonsense pages | 2 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 6 |
| Other candidates | 17 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 29 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Media.rifc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Boyyloganentertainment (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- NisonCo SEO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See https://nisonco.com Johnj1995 (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Diddyjumper (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a offensive username Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mrdconcord (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal). Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See sandbox. Cyrobyte (talk) 04:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Semi-protection: Indonesia-based IPs resumed disruptive edits after semi-protection (which was requested for this same issue) was lifted. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. User partially blocked by Callanecc so I have lifted the protection I previously placed. @HundenvonPenang: If they resume from a different IP range, please feel free to file a new protection request. Also, it can be helpful to mention that you've filed a related report when submitting a request like this one. Please consider doing that in the future. Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Daniel. Will keep that in mind. hundenvonPG (talk) 08:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistance disruptive editing and WP:VAND from IP user need protection for indefinitely Godknowme1 (talk) 06:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (1 January 2025 – present) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: CTOPS RUSUKR. Split from Timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (1 August – 31 December 2024). Borgenland (talk) 07:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continued edits in contravention of wikinote and talk page discussion, from a variety of IP addresses. When protection was requested about a week ago, some IP addresses were blocked, but the edits have continued, from other IP addresses. DH85868993 (talk) 07:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Proxies redirecting this article without actually blanking any content. - Ratnahastin (talk) 07:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive addition of unsourced cast members, since line-up of upcoming films were announced. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 09:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent edits by anonymous users deleting info on investments he has made, his political stances, residence, etc. Looking at the article history this has been a problem for about as long as the article has existed. Kingofthedead (talk) 09:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page requires protection due to concerns regarding the addition of unverified and potentially defamatory information by anonymous or unregistered users. The current lack of protection allows for the insertion of inaccurate or malicious content, which could be used to harass or blackmail the subject of the article. Page protection is necessary to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of the information presented and to prevent the misuse of the platform for harmful purposes. Klaudia Fagu (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page requires protection due to concerns regarding the addition of unverified and potentially defamatory information by anonymous or unregistered users. The current lack of protection allows for the insertion of inaccurate or malicious content, which could be used to harass or blackmail the subject of the article, who is in charge of this project and is mentioned within the article. Page protection is necessary to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of the information presented and to prevent the misuse of the platform for harmful purposes. Klaudia Fagu (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 10:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. And changing information into "JioStar". United Blasters (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 9 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Royalesignature (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I respectfully request autopatrol and patrol rights, based on my extensive experience and contributions to Wikipedia. With over 12 months of experience, I've created 60+ articles and improved 100+ others. Granting my request will streamline the New Page Patrol process. I previously requested these rights last month, which was denied. Since then, I've improved my contributions. I believe my dedication and improvement warrant reconsideration. Thank you for considering my request. Royalesignature (talk). 03:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 03:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)- (Non-administrator comment) I recently raised issues of close paraphrasing in one of your drafts Special:Permalink/1263547974, I am sure if I check more of your creations now, I will find similar issues. Your creations need a second eye and that is what NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Not done, per the above comment. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- B.Korlah (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
Hi, I am requesting for this rights, because I have about 5 new articles that are yet to be reviewed and surely meets the notability criteria, I have been creating and improving articles especially on African Cinema and with this right, I hope to reduce the backlog on the new page reviewers log.
Best regards, B.Korlah (talk) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done A few of your recent articles have unencyclopedic/subtly promotional sentences. For example, in Seven Doors (2024 series) you write
Netflix top leaders also expressed excitement at the project and how much it portrays the Nigerian culture, Netflix further reiterated her commitment to showcasing African stories and culture at large
. This kind of information is generally considered promotional fluff and shouldn't be included in the article since it does not say anything substantive. (also cc @Ibjaja055 who reviewed the article) - This is the kind of mistakes NPP is designed to catch and correct and I think you will benefit from somebody taking a second look at your articles. Sohom (talk) 04:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- CommunityNotesContributor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
To support WP:JAN25 I'd ideally like to be contributing to reducing the backlog as opposed to contributing to increasing the backlog at the same time. Overall in the last 25+ BLP articles I've created, there have been few to no edits made by NPR, aside from typos, grammar, and duplicate words. The first handful lacked certain templates, categories, default sorting, talk page banners, and the usual technical parts of articles, but I've since got to grips with including these. Since then I've only moved my drafts to mainspace, or created in mainspace, when I'm confident that there is enough SIGCOV and structure, and otherwise "incubate" articles not quite ready in draft space if not. I otherwise create quite a few redirects, with one disambiguated, and one batch up for discussion, but otherwise none deleted so far. Thanks for considering. CNC (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sundostund (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
An experienced editor with around 600 pages created, with few deleted; I've reviewed pages that they have created as part of NPP and they reach the standard expected without intervention. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- C411978 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Has created more than 200 articles, with none having been deleted. As part of NPP, I reviewed a recent creation, and found it to be complete without the need for editing. Reviewing other pages, they look to be similarly appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Aidillia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) In Buried Hearts, there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was first deleted but later recreated and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until GreenLipstickLesbian fixed and requested a revision deletion today. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Wikipedia is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
- It also appears to be that Labor Attorney Noh Moo-jin had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. Aidillia(talk) 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- Genius64868 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights
I have use wikipedia since year 2021 and contribute regularly for the readers in wikipedia. I think it's time to get categorised in confirmed user because the contributions I make in past year. And there won't be any reason to request to denied. Thanks Genius64868 (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
File mover
[edit]- Owais Al Qarni (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I primarily work with files on Wikimedia Commons, where I have file mover and autopatrol rights. The process of file moving on English Wikipedia is almost the same as the practices on Commons. I also have experience working on files on English Wikipedia, including submitting several rename requests. Moreover, I have file mover rights on Bengali Wikipedia, further demonstrating my familiarity with file management across Wikimedia projects. I am familiar with Wikipedia:File names and request this right to enhance my work. Thanks.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 05:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- JuniperChill (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been doing a lot of RM related stuff, including a few at RM/TR and closing them. I just meet the 3000 edit criteria and it's going to be helpful for me when closing RMs where the redirect page has more than one edit, and also helpful when I review draft submissions with an existing redirect. JuniperChill (talk) 12:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Done for 2 months. I'd suggest requesting an extension 1-2 weeks before it expires. SilverLocust 💬 18:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- GregariousMadness (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Sometimes, when I'm editing or creating math-related articles on Wikipedia, I see that some article titles are not formatted properly, like Artin L-function. I'd like to request page mover rights so I can fix these titles for math articles. I think I should be granted an exception to the 3000 edit rule because I've created several math articles, and I don't plan to stop soon. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 18:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 1027 total edits. — MusikBot talk 18:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. The guidelines also say you need to have experience with moving pages, but you have only done one move. You already have permissions necessary to move most pages, but if you need help moving a page, you can request assistance at WP:RM/TR. SilverLocust 💬 18:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Gwanki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Freedoxm (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Even if you're not pending changes reviewer, you can reject pending changes by reverting them. Pending changes reviewer, on the other hand, gives you the ability to accept changes. Rusty 🐈 14:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I already know that, and the reason why im really requesting this is to accept pending changes and to reject them at the same time. (forgot to put the acceptance part) 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 03:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Mon Bhai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I believe this could help me out with the current vandalism fighting I do that may involve pages with pending changes. I have read WP:RCP, and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's P&Gs. Mon Bhai converse∫edits Mon Bhai (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Asteramellus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting Pending Changes reviewer permission - I am active editor for quite some time now and recently saw an alert for January New Page patrol backlog drive. I want to contribute to that, but thought I can start with Pending change reviewer first. I have a good understanding of wiki policies, and am continuing to familiarize myself with them. I have also read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Criteria_to_receive_this_permission and understand expectations for both gaining the rights and performing the pending changes. Asteramellus (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Malhar1234 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Malhar1234 (talk) 21:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 21:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done, @Malhar1234, buddy. you were declined 2 times on related permissions this month. Please read the room (and related policies). You are closer to getting a WP:CIR block than getting advanced permissions. Sohom (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me! But I can't understand, what you want to say in last sentance, -"You are closer to getting a WP:CIR block than getting advanced permissions".
- If you don't mind can you explain me about that. Malhar1234 (talk) 12:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Malhar1234 Looking at your talk page, you have received a warning for large language model usage (which is explicitly discouraged), and looking at your latest article Tripura Queen Pineapple, you still haven't stopped using large language models. That coupled with the fact that you appear to be hat collecting (repeatedly asking for advanced permissions with actually understanding/caring to check if you are qualified + you actually need them) makes me feel like you are not listening to feedback and/or are not caring enough to play by our rules, which (imo) makes you teetering close to a WP:CIR block. (also cc @ToadetteEdit who appears to be your mentor on the Growth extension who might be able to give you pointers on how to course-correct). Sohom (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I just got pinged. @Malhar1234, you should really stop requesting permissions and focus on writing content manually and not with the use of a LLM such as ChatGPT. Will be willing to guide you to become a better editor. Otherwise, by not listening or understanding my advises and advices (and warnings) from others, you will most likely be blocked for competency issues. Take it slow, and start learning by heeding to the warnings/advices, or otherwise you will face consequences. ToadetteEdit (2025 is here) 17:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Malhar1234 Looking at your talk page, you have received a warning for large language model usage (which is explicitly discouraged), and looking at your latest article Tripura Queen Pineapple, you still haven't stopped using large language models. That coupled with the fact that you appear to be hat collecting (repeatedly asking for advanced permissions with actually understanding/caring to check if you are qualified + you actually need them) makes me feel like you are not listening to feedback and/or are not caring enough to play by our rules, which (imo) makes you teetering close to a WP:CIR block. (also cc @ToadetteEdit who appears to be your mentor on the Growth extension who might be able to give you pointers on how to course-correct). Sohom (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Blitzkriegswunder (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I patrol recent changes on occasion and have split part of Mikhail Gorbachev into General secretaryship of Mikhail Gorbachev. I have reverted countless non-constructive edits and I think I have enough experience to be a pending changes reviewer. I have also reviewed the GAN of Kiruko and Mizo Chieftainship. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 12:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- User was just renamed to User:Blitzkriegswunder. ToadetteEdit (2025 is here) 11:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Fathoms Below (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ultraodan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. I've been editing wikipedia semi-actively when real life allows for almost 3 years and recently surpassed 1000 edits. I have fully read and understood everything linked at WP:PCCRITERIA. The main reason I think I am suited to having pending changes reviewer rights is because of my current project to clean up the backlog at CAT:ESP, CAT:EEP and in the future CAT:COIREQ. The work between those and proposed changed reviewing is very similar and would allow me to help there as well. Ultraodan (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mithilanchalputra7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was granted right for 60 days now I would like to renew it. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "reviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 02:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- ArtistPrime (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Have been a part of Wikipedia for a while now, usually contributing with proofreading, rewriting for clarity, updating data, removing inaccurate data, etc. With most of my contributions being of an editing nature (rather than creating something new), I think that being able to approve pending edits from others would allow me to contribute more. ArtistPrime (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- NXcrypto (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi NXcrypto, please undo Special:Diff/1265567139 and respond to Worldbruce's concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but Worldbruce was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of Special:Diff/1265564114 indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and disengage from the conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lemonademan22 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I previously asked for rollback rights back in November but was turned down with the reason given was I need more experience first. I'm here two months later to once again ask for rollback rights as it would make what I do a lot easier. Although I don't edit Wikipedia purely to revert vandalism, I come across my fair share of it or unsourced claims and stuff to that degree that need reverting. So I am once again asking for rollback rights as I took the previous advice on board. Lemonademan22 (talk) 6:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 10:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. This is not what Rollback is for. Take a moment to read Wikipedia:Rollback and if that's what you would like to do, you can then check out the Counter Vandalism Unit to learn more. Rollback is only for reverting obvious vandalism—unsourced additions should be undone with an edit summary. Malinaccier (talk) 14:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Patrick_Welsh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Wikipedia more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Wikipedia's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Wikipedia before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, Patrick (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Matrix (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I requested template editor a few months ago for working on dark mode issues and got it for the rest of the year. However, it (turns out) (there are a lot of) dark mode related errors, a lot of which are in template protected templates or editnotices. Therefore I request a one year extension for this right. @Primefac: as the admin that originally gave this right. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? - uselessc} 21:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary template editor rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 22:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} (till March 2025), I'm sufficiently familiar with your dark-mode work to have faith that you will use the perms cautiously. Sohom (talk) 12:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done I did not read the last line of this request, extended for a year.Sohom (talk) 12:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abhiramakella (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Can I work on the {{Infobox game score}} template by adding the tooltips to the table headers corresponding to the quarters and overtimes, just like how they are implemented in {{Infobox American football game}}? I also did this in {{Americanfootballbox}}. I promise this will be really quick. Abhiramakella (talk) 18:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. As I said at this discussion, you do not meet all of the criteria, and gaming the system to try and boost your stats is not a good look. You have submitted an edit request, and there is no rush to get it implemented. Please be patient. Primefac (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links