User:Sun Creator/AFD


User page	Talk Page	To Do List	INFO	AFD	Control Panel	More

Checkuser pages
Requests: Unlisted • IP check • On hold Archives: Main • Older • IP checks • Unsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk Overview • Noticeboard • Procedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through: WP:RFCU/C/P

Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL WP:N WP:CLS WP:LIST WP:RS

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< March 24	March 26 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Lizzie Waterworth

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a speedy deletion request on this—voicing the titular character in a major TV series is obviously a credible claim of significance—but sourcing this meagre is clearly not appropriate in a BLP. ‑ Iridescent 17:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Television. ‑ Iridescent 17:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment: She is apparently a BAFTA-nominated individual and has written a book [1]. That source doesn't help notability, but at least confirms these facts. The BAFTA nomination would suggest notability, but I don't have enough coverage found to !vote at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
She's voiced named characters in notable productions, but I can't find much out there as far as sourcing goes. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment She was nominated for a British Academy Children's Award in the Performer category in 2019 for her role in Horrid Henry [2], and has also voiced named characters in the two other series mentioned in the article, plus 20 of 35 episodes of The Sandman (podcast) and all episodes of Tinpo (as well as named characters in other series that don't have WP articles like an animated version of Isadora Moon, 50 episodes of Mush-Mush and the Mushables and 35 episodes of Marcus Level. That would see her meet WP:NACTOR, but I have so far found very little independent sourcing, even to confirm her roles. I'll see if I can find more. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 19:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Sheldon Parkinson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player appears to fail WP:GNG due to highly underwhelming senior career. Soccerway lists him as eight games for Phoenix in the USL Pro in 2013, and one cup game for the Brooklyn Italians the year afterwards. That's it. Though Phoenix as a club and definitely the USL as a league are notable as themselves, notability of biographies is not inherited and I do not see WP:GNG from my searches, only run of the mill mentions in team updates and match reports Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Doug Lloyd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the references in the article, this player was drafted and traded. Played one game as a running back, but never touched the ball -- no attempts, no carries, no stats. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT, since trivial coverage does not support notability. mikeblas (talk) 18:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Pain-free consciousness

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A neologism. The term "pain-free consciousness" does not appear to be widely used in medical, philosophical, or bioethical literature.

Searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, and other academic databases return very few (if any) results using this exact phrase in a defined or standardised way. The page itself lacks strong inline citations to high-quality secondary sources (e.g., textbooks, peer-reviewed reviews, position papers). Much of the content seems to reflect original synthesis or philosophical interpretation rather than summarising an established topic. The page reads more like an exploration or argument for a concept, rather than a description of a recognised term. Klbrain (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Aku Odinkemelu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Source either fail WP:INDEPENDENT or are WP:DOGBITESMAN. Nothing to establish notability. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Law, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

REDCLIFFE Partners

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repost of previously deleted and salted material: WP:Articles for deletion/Redcliffe Partners * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 17:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Ispmanager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a speedy deletion request on this—there isn't enough similarity with the page deleted in 2011 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISPmanager (2nd nomination) for G4 to apply—but the same arguments still apply; I'm not seeing anything to indicate any particular significance. Web server software is most definitely not my area, so I'm perfectly willing to be convinced that this is in fact notable, but as it stands I'm seeing nothing to indicate that anything has changed in the last 14 years. ‑ Iridescent 17:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ‑ Iridescent 17:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Michael Dorf (entrepreneur)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination completed incorrectly by Qinifer (talk · contribs), which reads:

This article does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines and lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to demonstrate lasting encyclopedic value. Furthermore, this article has a long history of promotional editing, undisclosed paid editing, and conflict-of-interest violations, as documented on its Talk page. Multiple editors have repeatedly flagged its self-promotional tone, and past revisions contained material copied from the subject’s website. Given the pattern of promotional activity across multiple related articles (including Knitting Factory and City Winery), this article appears to exist to promote an individual and his business interests rather than provide an objective, verifiable encyclopedic entry. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Wisconsin. Shellwood (talk) 13:22, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Comment: I'm hesitant to !vote because the subject is friends with a high school friend of mind. I will note that the subject's son apparently used two different accounts to edit his father's article. I'm not sure if that's technically a violation of WP:SOCK or not. Bearian (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: This article does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, as it lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that demonstrate lasting encyclopedic value. Beyond failing WP:GNG and WP:NORG, there is a long-documented history of promotional editing, undisclosed paid contributions, and conflict-of-interest violations that severely undermine its credibility as a neutral, encyclopedic entry. The talk page documents multiple instances of single-purpose accounts editing this article exclusively to promote Michael Dorf and his business ventures, to the extent that the article contains primarily PR content copied verbatim from Dorf's personal and business websites. The aforementioned accounts include editors flagged for conflict of interest, such as Eli the Great, ZacharyDorf, (two accounts proven to be his children) and Citywinery155 (an employee account). These accounts engaged in promotional edits, and in the case of ZacharyDorf, continued making undisclosed COI edits despite repeated warnings. An editor in this AfD discussion has also noted that Dorf’s son used multiple accounts to edit the article, with those edits consisting of copying and pasting PR content from Dorf’s business websites. I agree with the editor who pointed this item out: this constitutes a clear violation of Wikipedia’s sockpuppetry policy (WP:SOCK). Furthermore, WP:AUTOBIO states that subjects of biographies, their families, and their close associates should not edit their own pages due to inherent COI.

This article also fails WP:NOTINHERITED, as Dorf’s limited coverage largely stems from his association with Knitting Factory and City Winery, rather than any independent accomplishments. Even if his businesses had received significant coverage, that would not automatically confer notability upon him, per WP:NOTINHERITED. Additionally, per WP:BLP and WP:V, biographies of living persons must be supported by high-quality independent sources, and this article has a long history of failing to meet that standard. Many prior revisions contained self-promotional content, with some passages directly copied from Dorf’s website, reinforcing the lack of neutral, independently verifiable information. The media coverage surrounding Dorf is largely event-driven, tied to business ventures and short-lived paid PR-driven press coverage, rather than sustained, in-depth coverage that establishes lasting notability. WP:RUNNING and WP:NOTNEWS clarify that notability requires more than scattered mentions or business promotions.

Given the pattern of documented paid promotional activity across multiple related articles, which include Knitting Factory and City Winery, both of which have ongoing deletion or merge discussions, this article appears to exist to promote an individual and his business interests rather than provide an objective, verifiable encyclopedic entry. Per WP:GNG and WP:NORG, it does not meet inclusion criteria. Furthermore, given the extensive history of promotional editing, undisclosed COI violations, and failure to demonstrate lasting notability in independent sources, this article and its related pages do not serve as neutral biographical entries, but rather as a promotional effort linked to Dorf’s business ventures. Wikipedia is not a business directory (WP:NOTADIRECTORY) nor a platform for self-promotion (WP:PROMO). Per WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:COI, deletion is the appropriate course of action. Qinifer (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 17:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

WXWZ-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable LPTV. Mostly unsourced; some promotional content. Merge into List of television stations in Puerto Rico#LPTV stations. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

BlacVolta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable digital company; the sources are either paid or not with reliable coverage of the subject (based on interviews or press-releases) Unicorbia (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ghana. Shellwood (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Comment Another frivolous deletion nomination orchestrated by (Personal attack removed).Postit note warrior (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia already has enough low-quality African-subject stubsPostit note warrior (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

The above comments should be disregarded by the closer as they were made out of spite, and the self-proclaimed warrior is now blocked indefinitely. Geschichte (talk) 05:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

WVDO-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable LPTV with lots of translators; no sources; outdated info. Merge into List of television stations in Puerto Rico#LPTV stations. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

LOGOS Research Group in Analytic Philosophy

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom. Was a soft delete in August, but I agree with the original nom, Brunnaiz, "Non-relevant organization, the article is backed only by self-sources and there's information missing sources. In fact, the article was replicated in cawiki around the same time with the very same problems, which could even be viewed as cross-wiki spam." Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy, Organizations, and Spain. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete I stand by my former opinion on this article. It was even deleted in Catalan Wikipedia. --Brunnaiz (talk) 18:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

StarDoc 134

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable operating system. No significant coverage found. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Alireza Kiarashi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously salted as Alireza kiarashi. No clear evidence of notability, and riddled with promotional trivialities. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Talently

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPRODUCT. No reliable source coverage, and I'm pretty sure the only purported independent coverage at all from TechRepublic is fake, as I could not find the reference. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Looking at Internet Archive, it looks like the TechRepublic page was already non-existing in the only archived version, and searching for "Talently" on their website returns nothing. Looking at other sources, they are either irrelevant to notability (the ManifestV3 source, which also appears to be a malfunctioning link), primary, or also non-existing (HR Drive). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Battle of Konotop (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since the merge of Battle of Konotop (2022) to Northern front of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in June 2024, there is only one article with "Battle of Konotop" in the title. That article is appropriately titled Battle of Konotop and has a hatnote pointing to the Northern front article. This DAB page is thus completely useless. I tried blanking and redirecting it [3], but was reverted by User:Bkonrad [4], so I am now here to request that this page be redirected to Battle of Konotop or deleted. Toadspike [Talk] 15:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Ukraine. Toadspike [Talk] 15:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom, self-explanatory lack of ambiguity. HappyWith (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete; AFAIC, this could have been done with technical request; only reason I reverted was to avoid having a page with "(disambiguation)" in title redirecting to an article, as that pretty much renders the point of having such redirects useless. older ≠ wiser 18:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Good point. I didn't realize that I can BLAR and then nominate for speedy deletion under G14. That feels wrong somehow but it looks like the rules allow it. Toadspike [Talk] 19:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Chaitanya Singha Dev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG, There is no significant coverage in the cited sources. Koshuri ^(グ) 14:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, History, India, and West Bengal. Koshuri ^(グ) 14:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Thomas Mahler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do think this article passes WP:N. Most of the sources that mention him are about Moon Studios, the studio he co-founded, or the development process of the Ori games, but they are not necessarily about him. OceanHok (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Video games. OceanHok (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment, OceanHok. I appreciate the scrutiny regarding WP:N. I believe Thomas Mahler meets the General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG) due to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that focus on him as an individual, not just Moon Studios or the Ori games. For example, the GamesIndustry.biz article "The making of Ori and the Blind Forest" (2015-03-23) provides detailed insight into Mahler’s personal background, his time at Blizzard, and his creative vision, beyond just the studio’s work. Similarly, the GamesRadar+ interview "Ori and the Will of the Wisps interview: Thomas Mahler on difficulty, storytelling, and more" (2020-03-10) centers on his design philosophy and leadership approach, highlighting his individual contributions. These sources, among others like the PC Gamer coverage of his role in No Rest for the Wicked’s development, offer substantial, non-trivial coverage of Mahler himself in secondary sources, independent of Moon Studios. While much of his recognition ties to the studio he co-founded, this is typical for creative directors, and the depth of personal focus in these articles supports his notability under WP:GNG. I’d welcome further discussion or suggestions to strengthen this! 84.242.10.82 (talk) 13:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete The only time I've seen this guy in the news was when he was accused of creating a toxic workplace. No mention of that in the article here though, instead we have an overly long promo/fluff piece that reads like it was AI generated. Seriously, look at some of these sentences: "Thomas Mahler’s career has significantly impacted modern game development, from the way games can be made to the way they are received." "Mahler’s work on Ori has had a lasting influence beyond just sales and awards. The games demonstrated that a small, remote team could produce an experience to rival big-budget studio productions, potentially influencing how future indie projects are perceived and funded." Even if other editors think he's notable, I'm not sure there's anything worth salvaging in the current article. I'd argue it needs WP:TNT either way. CurlyWi (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Also, the IP editor above appears to be a WP:SPA who has previously attempted to sanitize any criticism[5][6] in the Moon Studios article. CurlyWi (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Merge a small part to the Moon Studios article? I'm not sure he's quite notable enough, but there's more than ample coverage about the workplace "issues". Oaktree b (talk) 14:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Wero (payment)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I recommend the deletion of the Wero (payment) Wikipedia page due to a lack of notability, as it does not have sufficient independent coverage in reputable sources to demonstrate its significance in the mobile payment industry. Mapsama (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep: Coverage in RS [7], [8], [9]. [10], [11] Oaktree b (talk) 15:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep‎. No rationale presented by the nominator, and on their others, I very strongly advise re-editing them all with a statement with their own words. (non-admin closure) Nathannah • 📮 16:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Shaparak (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Shaparak_(company) Mapsama (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

FindSALT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose the deletion of the FindSALT Wikipedia page due to its lack of notability, as it relies on limited sources that do not provide substantial independent coverage or establish its significance within the restaurant industry. Mapsama (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United Arab Emirates. Shellwood (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Ari Klinger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose the deletion of the Ari Klinger Wikipedia page due to insufficient notability, as it relies heavily on limited sources that do not provide significant coverage Mapsama (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Eleos insurance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability, as it is primarily supported by limited sources that do not provide significant coverage Mapsama (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

David Mapley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability, as it relies on self-referential sources and lacks significant independent coverage from credible publications that establish him as a prominent figure within the financial industry. Furthermore, the content primarily focuses on specific legal cases without providing comprehensive context or wider recognition that meets Wikipedia's notability. Mapsama (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 14:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Caprinos Pizza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

questionable notability, as it relies predominantly on sources too closely associated with the subject and lacks significant independent coverage in reputable publications. Additionally, the article presents a promotional tone, failing to provide enough credible, verifiable content to justify its presence as a standalone entry on Wikipedia. Mapsama (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

MySyara

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

due to a lack of notability, as significant coverage from independent reliable sources is missing, and the content appears promotional in tone. Additionally, the article does not provide substantial historical context or unique insights that justify its standalone existence. Mapsama (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Beit Hall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years. Suggest that there is little independent third party sources showing that this student accommodation is notable and WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt (talk) 13:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and United Kingdom. JMWt (talk) 13:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Imperial College Halls of Residence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little on the page to suggest that this topic has independent notability outside of Imperial College London. Suggest at best it could be merged because of WP:NOTEVERYTHING but also suspect that detailed guff about student accommodation is unlikely to be notable even there. JMWt (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and United Kingdom. JMWt (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Oppose At least two of the current halls of residence and one former hall discussed in the article are notable as listed buildings per WP:GEOFEAT:

"Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable."

There is also evidence of notability for other halls, with significant coverage in the Evening Standard and ITV News, as well as in the trade magazine The Construction Index. That much of the page is sourced back to Imperial does not affect notability. Robminchin (talk) 15:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Wojciech Tyc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable footballer. No sources found beyond profiles from databases. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 13:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep. I feel like almost no effort is being put into many of these noms. He played numerous first-tier matches in the 1970s in Poland/France and still today gets interviewed by many newspapers as a "legend" and a "famous" footballer of the 1970s. He's frequently consulted today for his opinions on Polish football, e.g. this ("Wojciech Tyc, a member of the legendary Odra Opole"), this ("Wojciech Tyc was a terror on the football pitch in Poland in the 1970s. He was a striker who helped change the image of the Opole team from a small team to one that the biggest names had to reckon with."), this, this ("Wojciech Tyc, a former long-time striker of Odra Opole and a representative of Poland ... [he] represented the Opole club in the years 1972-1981. He played in the senior Polish national team once, in 1977, in a friendly match with Sweden. He was also on a long list of players considered in the composition of the World Cup in 1978, and in subsequent years he also played in the Olympic team. After leaving Odra, he went to France, where he ended his career, playing successively for FC Valenciennes, Amiens SC and US Argentan. Many years after ending his career, he still closely follows the activities of the Polish national team") and this ("Wojciech Tyc is one of the legends of Odra Opole. For many seasons he was the club's best sniper, and in 1977 he even played in the Polish national team. For two months Tyc has been managing the new football centre on Północna Street. However, the councillors from the audit committee want to look into the form of his employment. The complaint in this matter is already in the city hall."). It is absolutely inconceivable that he would not have received in-depth coverage in Poland / France in the 1970s, when he was most prominent, given how highly he is still discussed today. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
If he is so famous, why are there no good sources about him in his article?? WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
A third of all of Wikipedia is in stub-condition. That the article is in poor quality in no way means that the subject is non-notable. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Donald Walker (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a writer and musician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for writers or musicians. As always, neither writers nor musicians are automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on third-party coverage and analysis about their work -- but four of the nine footnotes here are just his own work being cited as metaverification of its own existence, two are blogs, one is a mere directory entry, and the only two nominally reliable sources in the bunch (one book and one improperly cited newspaper article) both just briefly namecheck Donald Walker without being about him in any sense, which is not the kind of coverage we need to see.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Männin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo for non notable short film. Lacks independent coverage, no sign of any reviews. Being screened and winning minor awards does not satisfy NFILM. Wanky promotional writing. One of multiple promo pieces largely created by the films production company. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, France, and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 12:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Die Tapferen Haende im Chaos der Zeit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo for non notable short film. Lacks independent coverage, no sign of any reviews. Being screened and winning minor awards does not satisfy NFILM. Wanky promotional writing. One of multiple promo pieces largely created by the films production company. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and France. Shellwood (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment: I'm taking a list at the claims. None of them establish notability.

The film never screened at any film festival that is so notable that it would be notable on that basis alone. It screened at Cannes, but not in any area that would establish notability. Cannes is exclusive, but not so exclusive (outside of Un Certain Regard) that appearing at it would equal notability. Film festival appearances are kind of a given and seen as a routine thing. They can make it more likely that coverage could exist, but it's never a guarantee.

The awards are largely unusable. The only one that might give partial notability is the Colorado festival, but I'll note that the coverage for this is either local Colorado papers or papers that are local to the award winners. Their wins aren't listed in places like Variety or similar - things that would help establish that the festival is notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. The IndieFest Film Awards and Accolade Competition are run by the same people and are a vanity award mill. They hold their festivals virtually and about four times a year. Basically everyone gets an award, usually as an award of merit or recognition judging by the October 2024 festival. There are entry fees and while that's not always a sign of a vanity award, legit festivals usually don't hold sales/discounts. They also do not make winners purchase their own award statues or stickers to decorate posters or DVDs. Shoot, the company doesn't even automatically give winners a letter announcing their win - they have to request them. I know that any form of award makes it easier to promote themselves in the business, but this company has always been one of the laziest and most obvious vanity awards out there.

There are no sources on the article as far as reviews and such go. This just doesn't appear to be a notable short film. I'll take a look for sourcing before making an official call, but offhand it doesn't look good. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Redirect to Mika'ela Fisher. That did not take long. To be honest, I'm starting to seriously wonder if the director herself is even notable. I have been giving her the benefit of the doubt that she is, but the amount of promotional puffery and vanity awards makes me think that she might actually fail NDIRECTOR. Since there's a chance the studio might see this:

This is why you work with Wikipedia and try to follow editing, sourcing, and notability guidelines. Fisher might be notable (haven't checked for her in specific yet) but when you create vanity, WP:PUFFERY laden articles you make that person look less legitimate and non-notable by default. You are making your client look bad and you are poisoning the well for them on Wikipedia.

At bare minimum I can tell that the director's page needs to be razed and re-written to conform with Wikipedia's guidelines. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Altacit global

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy recreation of Altacit Global, which was nuked under G5 earlier; see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy (permalink to latest report). As for the company itself, much of its coverage is in the form of PR pieces, paid-for puff pieces like this, or some passing mentions with no further detail. Subject fails WP:NCORP and by a good margin. Java Hurricane 11:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Java Hurricane 11:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete, removed another one from the Harvi/SI SEO farm. Most of the rest is directory listings, puff press. Very likely sock or another UDPE, but will let checkuser look at it. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Yogodyan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero reliable in-depth sources in current article (2 of the 3 sources are deadlinks). Search turned up the same, zero in-depth from independent, reliable sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Hong Kong Tang King Po College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no Substance in the article , the given source doesn't justify notability. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Hong Kong. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Wahid Enitan Oshodi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable person according to wikipedia standarts 多少战场龙 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 多少战场龙 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Engineering, Sports, Tennis, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Speedy keep: Being the president of the African Table Tennis Federation helps him pass WP:ANYBIO and even WP:NTENNIS, and previously being a Commissioner for Youth, Sports, and Social Development helps him pass WP:NPOL (WP:NSUBPOL). Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Speedy keep: The subject passes WP:NPOL and WP:NTENNIS. He is currently the President of the African Table Tennis Federation, the former commisioner of Commissioner for Youth, Sports, and Social Development and former president of the Nigerian Table Tennis Federation. Ibjaja055 (talk) 13:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Speedy keep: Being a former commissioner alone is enough to speedy keep this, it clearly meets WP:NPOL. Idoghor Melody (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep I agree with the others, notable as Senate commissioner and NTTF president. KylieTastic (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G7 by Cryptic. (non-admin closure)‎ Shellwood (talk) 12:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Yousef Abo Zarad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his personal or professional activities Xrimonciam (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Internet, Syria, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kate Corrigan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional character; article sourced entirely to primary sources, a quick search didn't reveal any substantial secondary sources. Not notable. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Richard St George Mansergh-St George

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 17#Richard St George Mansergh-St George. Article was restored after being subject to a BLAR in 2019. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, Ireland, United Kingdom, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Comment:: I found the copyright page [here] that has apparently been transcribed word of word. However, from what I see online it appears the subject is sufficiently notable to warrant an article and there are quite a few other independent sources that could be used to rewrite this, perhaps using some of this source to create perfectly acceptable article. Perhaps draftify or start a sandbox that can be worked on by some interested editors. ww2censor (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep The original 4 line 2010 WP article contains the (mis-cast) words the name of 'St George' was assumed on inheriting his maternal uncle's property, Richard St George Mansergh-St George, the words following ‘Mansergh’ are inserted a little later here; the 2013 article by Matranga says the name of ‘St George’ following ‘Mansergh’ was assumed on inheriting his maternal uncle’s property, Richard St George Mansergh-St George. The Matranga article has a copyright date of 2012-13, but that does not push it back before the earliest WP version, nor do we know what the 2012 version of the Matraga article looks like. I don't see any sign in the WP article's history that it has been cut-and-pasted, instead it seems to have been developed a step at a time. It looks to me that either the Matranga article is the copyvio, or Matranga is one and the same as the main Wikipedia editor of our article.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC).

Note, I say mis-cast because the sentence implies that "Richard St George Mansergh-St George" is the property, not the uncle. I don't see this phraseology arising independently. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC).
Comment: The main author has, on the talk page of the article, requested deletion, as they want the material only to appear on their web site, that being cited above. They previously requested this in 2019.
There is a note on the talk page that explains that this article is the origin of the external article, which has been there since 2013. Nominators for deletion are expected to check the talk page, this is part of the documented process. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 15:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC).

Shola Akinlade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

should be removed due to the lack of independent, reliable sources to support the claims made in the article. Akinlade's notability may be better covered within broader fintech topics instead of maintaining a dedicated article. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering, Football, Software, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Redirect to Sporting Lagos F.C. as possible search term, does not look to be independently notable. Giant Snowman 19:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose deletion and redirect proposer User:Xrimonciam makes the argument that this individual would be better covered in other topics, however they've also submitted this individual's company Paystack for deletion as well-- it seems a curious motivation to delete both of these when they both can be considered notable. This entrepreneur is certainly notable for the region and deleting would contribute to systematic bias on the site. Not only did Akinade get into Y Combinator, one of the first African startups to do so, their exit to Stripe is one of the biggest success stories for African fintech of recent history. The fact that he's now involved in owning a private football club is significantly notable beyond his business interests. More than fulfills the notability requirements Nayyn (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 08:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Sanjeev Kumar Bijli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his corporate role. Most references focus on his position at PVR Cinemas rather than demonstrating substantial independent recognition Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Film, Delhi, England, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep: Sources cited in the article like [12], [13], and [14] are bylined, independent, and provide sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
None of the sources provided by you is reliable. I read them all. They all are talking about either the other brother or business or are just collection of citations (thus not meeting Reliable sources standards):

Sanjeev smiles, and nods his head.

"No, actually both of us are innovators and look at improvisation in equal measures. But Ajay is slightly more of the innovator than I am. Innovation in the film industry is absolutely mandatory as it had been stagnant for the longest time."

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/the-bro-code-of-bijli-brothers-divide-the-work-multiply-the-fun/articleshow/51680481.cms?

[15]

Adds Sanjeev: “For now, focusing on maintaining the numbers and the profitability in Cinemax-and analyzing the numbers there-are top priorities. We are also talking to the team and meeting and motivating them, assuring them things are the way they were. We are also learning from each other. Cinemax is a very well-run company with high profitability, processes and systems. We are trying to apply best practices of both to the common entity. We are also looking at enhancing the numbers of the common entity.” 31.165.10.116 (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
no sufficient coverage, not independence in coverage to meet GNG. 31.165.10.116 (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete sources are not deep and reliable. Interviews or brief press release mentions. --31.165.10.116 (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Galatta Ganapathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Notability (films). See that Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Generally used sources lists Filmibeat as unreliable. There are no reliable reviews [16], [17], and [18]. DareshMohan (talk) 07:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Tamil films of 2003: standard [WP:ATD]] for released films with notable cast; not opposed to Keep, as this is 2003 and print sources might exist and show this meets WP:NFIC in some way. Opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Redirect to List_of_Tamil_films_of_2003#July—September or Delete. 2 sources on the page, one is unreliable WP:ICTFSOURCES and the other just lists the song track from the movie. Nothing notable and no significant coverage. RangersRus (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Labov marketing communications and training

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability (NCORP), mainly unsourced page with promotional content. Cinder painter (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Very little content is referenced, and of the three references, one is directly tied to the subject and other is a local chamber of commerce (whose main task is to promote local businesses). So there's one article that's independent and reliable, which maybe (or maybe not) establishes notability. I've tagged the article as needing more references, but I don't think the company meets notability criteria. Ira Leviton (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Tim Gokey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his corporate role. Most references focus on his position at Broadridge Financial Solutions rather than demonstrating substantial independent recognition. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Technology, England, United States of America, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

With respect, this CEO of an S&P 500 company cearly crosses the WP:GNG threshold. There is plenty of "independent coverage" to note, as you can see here, here, here, here, here, and here (to share just a few examples), ranging from his career to board memberships, time at Oxford University, support for women's rowing, and more. Just because news coverage often focuses on his leadership at Broadridge Financial Solutions doesn't make him any less notable; to the contrary, Broadridge is one of the largest companies in the world, making what Gokey does there even more important in the grand scheme of things. Chief Executive is a big deal, and they clearly profiled him for a reason, going into detail about non-Broadridge-related stuff like captaining New College Oxford’s crew team apparently. This article got into rowing and his Rhodes scholarship too, among others. Doctorstrange617 (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Ryan McInerney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources to establish notability beyond routine coverage of his professional role. Most sources primarily focus on Visa Inc., rather than McInerney as a notable individual. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, United States of America, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Péter Haraszti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notable, verifiable sources proving his subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. A lot of media references are personally relevant. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Hungary. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Gridbeyond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the attempt to make it seem otherwise, there is no useful coverage of the article subject I could find, and citing 4 copies of every press release (or churnalism of the same) about a funding round or a new contract signed does not make for an encyclopedic article. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, Technology, and Ireland. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

CJ Darcl Logistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources, failing to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If the article primarily relies on self-published sources or promotional content, it would violate Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability standards. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey Pandora! I have made changes in the article. Adityasharma0701 (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

British Columbia Excalibur Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. I found no in-depth coverage in reliable sources after searching through Google and provincial archives (Vancouver City archives + UBC Library). The now defunct party achieved insignificant results in the one election it contested (less than one-tenth of a percent in 2013), so there is no obvious claim of notability.

Of the 6 sources cited, 2 are primary sources, 2 are blogs, 1 is routine local coverage for the election cycle, and 1 is a routine registration list from Elections BC. I found one more article from a minor news publisher that accepts articles from the general public. A lack of reliable and in-depth coverage indicates a lack of lasting significance as well. Yue🌙 05:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 05:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Pitch Yarn of Matter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been around for nearly 20 years yet has not indicated how the subject is notable per WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Google search for "Pitch Yarn of Matter" comes up with a lot of directories, social media, and sites that have copied from Wikipedia, but not significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete – I did a WP:BEFORE, and there is zero WP:SIGCOV. Article created in the early days of the project, in disagreement with the current guidelines. Svartner (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Trina Firmalo-Fabic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mayor of a small town in an island province. Fails WP:NPOL. Sourcing only covers her COVID-19 pandemic feat and a profile from the Obama Foundation. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Beings just a mayor doesn’t cut the edge for NPOL#1 and the sources I see doesn’t meet NPOL#2. If there are sources that I missed, I’ll appreciate a ping to re-evaluate my !vote. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

List of breweries in San Diego County, California

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOT. This is as close it as it can get to a directory/Yellow Page and I question the encyclopedic value. Graywalls (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Lists, and California. Graywalls (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Merge to List of breweries in California. DotesConks (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep, but remove all of the breweries without Wikipedia articles. Keeping this list up-to-date is unrealistic -- the only reason to keep it is to serve as a navigational aid for the several Wikipedia articles on breweries in the county, but that is a good reason to do so. The yellow-pages problem can be fixed by deleting everything without a Wikipedia article -- anything that gets an article can be re-added. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Redirect to List of breweries in California. Agree with @Mrfoogles that we should not be listing non-notable locations – microbreweries are common and usually unremarkable local businesses like other stores and restaurants and don't need to be listed, but this doesn't warrant a separate county list. The statewide list should also be trimmed to the notable ones though. Reywas92^Talk 03:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Going to note merging appears to have been already discussed on the talk page of this list, so there might be some useful info there. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Merge to List of breweries in California. Keep only notable entries (with articles) and cleanse the rest. Ajf773 (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
I concur with Mrfoogles: Keep, but remove all of the breweries without Wikipedia articles. This will remove about half of the listings and leave only the ones that are notable enough to have their own article. There are enough notable breweries in the county to justify an article listing them. -- MelanieN (talk) 09:48 19 March 2025 (UTC)
There is also Beer in San Diego County, California#Notable breweries as a merge target. There are fewer than 20 notable breweries and we certainly don't need a standalone page for just a bulleted list when there's this article and the statewide list. Reywas92^Talk 14:02, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If not keep, where should this be targeted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Marv (Sin City)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor comic book character. While there is a reception, it is just a summary of several listicles, in which the character takes at best a 24th place. Other than that, this is just a plot summary and a list of appearances in various media. This fails WP:GNG and at best could be redirected to the List of Sin City characters _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Merge to List of Sin City characters: the info currently in reception can be merged to the list, condensed to about a sentence, probably, and the rest of the article is just plot summary. Did a quick google and didn't find anything obvious -- it seems unlikely by assumption he needs his own article separate from Sin City. I don't know of a lot of reviews that only talk about one character except for the most famous works. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep. He is not a "minor comic book character"!!!!! I've expanded the reception. Please take less Sin City-related articles to AfD or do thorough BEFORES, Piotrus. Marv clearly meets WP:GNG. Thank you.-Mushy Yank. 19:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -Mushy Yank. 10:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Merge to List of Sin City characters - Mushy Yank has done good work, but in my opinion all of these are passing mentions of Marv, except for maybe the Dan Rempala book, so it still doesn't meet GNG. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Tons of other sources exist; might add more if I have time. (and thank you but I beg to differ, most of the sources I added are not only "passing mention"). -Mushy Yank. 16:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Added 1. No time to do more but sources exist. -Mushy Yank. 17:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MILL WP:NOTGENEALOGY - reads mostly like a genealogical entry, half of the article is about family tree and their place in it, the rest is places they worked and where they got an education. D1551D3N7 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Mexico. D1551D3N7 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Weak delete Did a source review -- none of them currently have a significant description of him. He gets mentioned in the margins as his father, etc. is discussed, mostly, and there are a bunch of non-independent sources about him at conferences. One article talks about his children, interestingly enough, but not really him.

Googling, I immediately find sources mentioning him -- e.g.

Overall they seem to all focus on events he attends & one or two interviews, but not really about him. There's also this book in Spanish whose relevance I'm unsure of.

However, I feel like a more thorough Spanish source search might turn up some things. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: On ProQuest, the most representative database for Spanish-language media in the Wikipedia Library, he receives a meager 13 hits, all of which are again trivial mentions about events he attended and his relation to the line. Moreover, the only scholarly coverage is a minor inclusion in a 2024 thesis. Although there are many mentions in reliable sources, they do not amount to WP:SIGCOV and thereby fail WP:GNG. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep: I'm going to acknowledge the fact the article itself is lacking in notability; but it still has value and potential. Leaving aside the fact he's a descendant of Karl I of Austria - he's been involved in press conferences regarding the history of his family, and has been directly mentioned in a government website (gov.mx) for his involvement with the Morelia Music Festival, which underscores his engagement in public and cultural affairs. Therefore, I vote to keep the article with the intent to enhance it further. JayzBox (talk) 00:58, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate your intent, but to do so you'd need to find reliable sources that say more than the current ones do, and as of yet no one has been able to do that. I would support moving it to draftspace if you want to work on it but not now, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Juniper Heights, Arizona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We missed this one in earlier passes through Arizona "communities"; it's a 1960s-era NN subdivision that once was isolated in the hills south of Prescott, but sprawl has since reached it. Mangoe (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Unsurprisingly, the history books have nothing; and the toponymy books are talking about a mesa not a housing corporation (which I am presuming is what "HC" stands for in some old mailing addresses). There's nothing to be had on this. Uncle G (talk) 04:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is a copy of Occupational therapy#Global occupational therapy. If you intend to break it out into its own article, then please remove the section from that article. (The text will need more wikilinks, and will also need adjustment to its tone to sound more encyclopedic.) Brian Kendig (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Brian Kendig (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep -- This isn't an argument for deletion, and you shouldn't use AFD as a way to underline a point to other editors. If you think this article is fine you can remove the section yourself; if you think it's not fine you can tag it with {{tone}}. Before nominating an article for AFD you are required to search for reliable sources in good faith. There aren't any right now, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

For example, what about this work, which appears independent and is a huge source. More sources are this book, this book, and this book. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Waheed Zafar Qasmi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. References are YouTube, Wordpress, and other unreliable sources. Those I can find that are reliable are mainly mentions. CNMall41 (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, and Pakistan. CNMall41 (talk) 01:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Poetry, Radio, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete: I see no coverage about this individual in my search, what's now in the article is primary or non-RS. I don't see notability for this person. Oaktree b (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Citizens Action Party (British Columbia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party existed in between elections and did not contest any elections before dissolving. There is therefore no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: There is absolutely no sourcing whatsoever on this. The article also says "The Citizens Action Party was de-registered by Elections BC in June 2009." — Maile (talk) 01:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Emerged Democracy Party of British Columbia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party achieved insignificant results (less than one-hundredth of a percent) in the one election it contested, so there is no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

British Columbia Youth Coalition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party's electoral results in 2005 were insignificant as well, so there is no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable, third-party sources, and the coalition appears to have limited impact or recognition beyond its own self-promotion or its immediate activities. --Xrimonciam (talk) 10:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Link BC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party existed in between elections and did not contest any elections before dissolving. There is therefore no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete - For reasons above and the fact that it cites no sources (which would fail being talked about in WP:NOTABILITY). DotesConks (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Petr Píšek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable nobleman with a biography that hundreds of Czech medieval lower nobles had. The sources used are only trivial mentions. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep, I wrote this article as I believe the subject is a politically notable figure from an important family. The subject held royal appointments and was the ruler of several notable castles/villages. The sources I've found are brief, yes, but are clear that this subject was notable during a politically and militarily unstable time in the Kingdom of Bohemia. The subject is 600 years old, and I presume there are many sources that are not digitized or I have missed on my search. I also do not want to discount the modern depiction of the subject (even a characterization) in the recent video game referenced in the article. While not proof of notability on its own, I do believe it supports the above assertions. Mbdfar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

According to the content of the article, he was the equivalent of a local politician, and ruled only the villages of Perštejnec, Vysoká and co-ruled Suchdol. His family was only a wealthy bourgeois family, not a noble family. There is no article for him or his family on cswiki, which would be very unlikely if him or his family was important like you say. You need WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate his notability. With all due respect, it seems that the main motivation for the creation of the page is the appearance of the character in the video game based on him, not the merits of the real character. FromCzech (talk) 11:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
He ruled "only" three towns/castles. Respectfully, the cswiki has 7% of the articles that the enwiki does and is not a qualifier of subject notability. I learned about this historical figure through his portrayal in recent media, correct. My motivation for creating this page was improving Wikipedia's coverage of notable subjects found in this time and place. Mbdfar (talk) 11:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, I should not have written that last sentence. Cswiki is of course not qualifier of subject notability, I wrote this just for comparison. The existence of SIGCOV is decisive. FromCzech (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Comment, to share a comment by Bigvadrouille549, where a source was provided "from the historian Emmnuel Leminger on the Italian Court. You can see that Peter of Pisek was mintmaster between 1391-99 [19]". The referenced text seems to be on page 169.

Another trivial mention in the list of burghers who held this clerk position. FromCzech (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Quite more than a list of names as you insinuate. Perhaps the position is important enough to have such biographical records collated and published 500 years later. Mbdfar (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Seems to be a quite prestigious position if I am correct in equating it to Nejvyšší mincmistr [cs], an article which does mention the subject. Mbdfar (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Weak keep The article is well sourced, it probably just needs a rewrite

Alexthegod5 (talk) 22:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

delete. Article was probably only created due to the Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 reference mentioned at the end. Cottagechez (talk) 01:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep -- this article is fairly thorough and well cited. The purpose of the notability policy is to make sure decent articles can be written -- this one is fairly decent and talks about him. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Just because the sources are brief doesn't mean they're completely trivial -- the current article describes him as reputed to be kind in church donations, built a church, defended a castle -- there is, I think, enough stuff there to prove that an article can be written and has. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)