User talk:Xrimonciam

March 2024

Hello, I'm Jtrrs0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Subculture, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for raising the concern. I will take a second look at it then add the relevant reference. Xrimonciam (talk) 17:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mejja, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, your concern is well noted. Thank you. Xrimonciam (talk) 05:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious; Wikipedia editing is all about quality over quantity. The fact that you even thought this was a good edit shows extreme incompetence. You are not welcome here. Graham87 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hmmm, I thought you were spamming low-quality graphic design sites but [[this was actually a good edit. Your editing pattern is still ridiculous for a new user and the fact that you had to be warned *twice* about sources is concerning. Graham87 (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

Concerning the previous warnings, I made sure I included sources to my edits at all times. My edits on graphic design sites were all source-based therefore I do not understand why you thou thought me incompetent. Additionally, am I still blocked? Please clarify your concerns. Xrimonciam (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey, Graham87, this looks like it may have been a misunderstanding? Valereee (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Not all references are reliable sources by Wikipedia's standards. famousgraphicdesigners.org (which you added to David Carson's article) is just a random website that may well borrow heavily from Wikipedia; it has no reputation for fact-checking that makes it in any way reliable. In contrast, The Guardian, which you added to Colin Forbes's page, is a long-lasting and widely respected newspaper that absolutely is a reliable source. I've unblocked you because my block was largely based on a misunderstanding, but I'm still highly concerned about your editing speed and some of your referencing practices. Graham87 (talk) 15:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)