Wikipedia:WikiProject Prussia/Assessment

<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em;

This section is still under construction

Welcome to the assessment department of the Prussia WikiProject.

This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Prussia-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPFC}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Prussia articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Prussia WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Prussia}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Prussia articles)		FA
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Prussia articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Prussia articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Prussia articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Prussia articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Prussia articles)		Stub

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Prussia articles)		???

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Psychology (as of January 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ball (as of September 2014)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of literary movements

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

September 19, 2012

Reassessed

• Frederick I of Prussia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

September 17, 2012

Renamed

• Albert, Duke of Prussia renamed to Albert Herzog, Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach, Duke of Prussia.
• Dorothea Oldenburg Princess of Denmark renamed to Dorothea of Denmark, Duchess of Prussia.

Assessed

• Albert, Duke in Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Dorothea of Denmark, Duchess of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Project:WikiProject Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class (rev · t).
• File:Flag of Prussia 1892-1918.svg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class (rev · t).

September 16, 2012

Renamed

• Dorothea of Denmark, Duchess of Prussia renamed to Dorothea Oldenburg Princess of Denmark, Duchess of Prussia.

Assessed

• Dorothea Oldenburg Princess of Denmark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

September 11, 2012

Reassessed

• Pomeranian duck (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

September 9, 2012

Assessed

• Poczta Królewiecka (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

September 5, 2012

Renamed

• Free State of Prussia (1918–1933) renamed to Free State of Prussia.

Reassessed

• Recovered Territories (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• Battle of Löbau (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Free State of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Pomeranian duck (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t).
• Category:Domesticated pigeon breeds originating in Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class (rev · t).
• Category:Horse breeds originating in Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class (rev · t).

Removed

• Burke's Peerage (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t).
• Debrett's (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t).
• Susz (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t).

August 26, 2012

Renamed

• German exodus from Eastern Europe renamed to German exodus from Central and Eastern Europe.

Reassessed

• Augusta Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• German exodus from Central and Eastern Europe (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Hieronymus Roth (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Johann Ludwig Klüber (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Siege of Mainz (1793) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Wolf's Lair (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

Removed

• German Caribbean (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Second Northern War (talk) removed. Quality rating was GA-Class (rev · t).

August 12, 2012

Reassessed

• Almanach de Gotha (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Removed

• Franz Eckert (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t).

August 10, 2012

Assessed

• Almanach de Gotha (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t).
• Burke's Peerage (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t).
• Debrett's (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t).

July 31, 2012

Assessed

• O. E. Hasse (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Tannenberg (film) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

July 10, 2012

Assessed

• Teutonic takeover of Danzig (Gdańsk) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t).
• Warsaw (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Wilhelmine of Prussia, Queen of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

July 10, 2012

Assessed

• Teutonic takeover of Danzig (Gdańsk) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t).
• Warsaw (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Wilhelmine of Prussia, Queen of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

July 10, 2012

Assessed

• Teutonic takeover of Danzig (Gdańsk) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t).
• Warsaw (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Wilhelmine of Prussia, Queen of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

June 27, 2012

Reassessed

• World War I (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

June 26, 2012

Assessed

• Battle of Famars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Battle of Raismes (1793) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Battle of Valmy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• French Revolutionary Wars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

June 22, 2012

Assessed

• Bishopric of Minden (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Dano-Swedish War (1658–1660) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class (rev · t).
• Franco-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Province of Pomerania (1653–1815) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Siege of Stralsund (1711–1715) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

June 18, 2012

Reassessed

• Triple Alliance (1788) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

Removed

• Third Partition of Poland (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t).

June 16, 2012

Assessed

• Otto Lilienthal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

June 15, 2012

Reassessed

• Russo-Prussian alliance (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

June 13, 2012

Reassessed

• Kamerun (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• Great Northern War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

June 9, 2012

Reassessed

• Caprivi Strip (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

June 5, 2012

Renamed

• Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of Brandenburg renamed to Elizabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate (1597–1660).

Assessed

• Elizabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate (1597–1660) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

May 31, 2012

Removed

• Silesian Uprisings (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t).

May 26, 2012

Renamed

• Battle of Tannenberg (1914) renamed to Battle of Tannenberg.

Assessed

• Battle of Tannenberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

May 16, 2012

Assessed

• William Edenborn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

May 11, 2012

Assessed

• Hohenzollern Castle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

May 9, 2012

Assessed

• Giżyn, Myślibórz County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Heros von Borcke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Węgorzyno (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

April 30, 2012

Renamed

• Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of of Brandenburg renamed to Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of Brandenburg.

Assessed

• Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of Brandenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

April 21, 2012

Renamed

• Elizabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate (1597–1660) renamed to Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of of Brandenburg.

Assessed

• Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of of Brandenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

April 21, 2012

Renamed

• Elizabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate (1597–1660) renamed to Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of of Brandenburg.

Assessed

• Elisabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of of Brandenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

April 18, 2012

Assessed

• Malbork (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

April 17, 2012

Assessed

• Mitteleuropa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

April 15, 2012

Assessed

• Anglo-Prussian alliance (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class (rev · t).

April 14, 2012

Reassessed

• Austro-Prussian War (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

April 11, 2012

Assessed

• Forced labor of Germans after World War II (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• List of terms used for Germans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t).

April 10, 2012

Assessed

• Crown of Wilhelm II (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Eleanor of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• German Crown Jewels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• German State Crown (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian Crown Jewels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Queen Louise League (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Sanssouci (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as FA-Class (rev · t).
• Template:German Crown Jewels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).

April 8, 2012

Renamed

• Prussian Union (Evangelical Christian Church) renamed to Evangelical Church of the Union.

Assessed

• Duchess Sophia Charlotte of Oldenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Felix Salm-Salm (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Imperial Ducal Abbey of Kempten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Knights of the Teutonic Order (film) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Neumark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Prince Eitel Friedrich of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Princess Elisabeth Anna of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian Union of churches (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• War of the Bavarian Succession (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as FA-Class (rev · t).
• Żagań (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Electresses of Brandenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:GEmpireGSChiefs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:GermanChancellors (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:GermanUnification (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:German Confederations 1806-1871 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:German monarchs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:History of Brandenburg and Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Interior Ministers of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Monarchs of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:NavPosenDistricts (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:PoliticsPrussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Pretenders to the German and Prussian thrones since 1918 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:PrussianFMs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Prussian Royal Family (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Prussian clans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Prussian princes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Prussian princesses by marriage (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:Recipients of the Grand Cross (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:States of the German Confederation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:States of the German Empire (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:States of the North German Confederation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).
• Template:States of the Weimar Republic (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t).

March 16, 2012

Assessed

• Anti-German sentiment (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Centre Against Expulsions (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

March 10, 2012

Assessed

• Pregolya River (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Seven Bridges of Königsberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

March 9, 2012

Reassessed

• Prussian National Monument for the Liberation Wars (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

March 7, 2012

Assessed

• Frederick III, German Emperor (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as FA-Class (rev · t).
• Germany (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as FA-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian National Monument for the Liberation Wars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t).
• Royal Prussian Army of the Napoleonic Wars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

March 6, 2012

Reassessed

• Berlin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

March 3, 2012

Renamed

• List of rulers of Prussia renamed to List of monarchs of Prussia.

Assessed

• List of monarchs of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t).

March 2, 2012

Assessed

• Erika Steinbach (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Mayakovskoye (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Nemmersdorf massacre (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Yantarny (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

Removed

• All Quiet on the Western Front (1930 film) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t).

March 1, 2012

Removed

• A Bridge Too Far (book) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t).
• A Bridge Too Far (film) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t).

February 29, 2012

Assessed

• Prussian thaler (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian vereinsthaler (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

February 27, 2012

Assessed

• Prussian Palaces and Gardens Foundation Berlin-Brandenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

February 24, 2012

Renamed

• History of German settlement in Eastern Europe renamed to History of German settlement in Central and Eastern Europe.

Assessed

• History of German settlement in Central and Eastern Europe (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

February 23, 2012

Reassessed

• Martin Luther (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

February 9, 2012

Assessed

• County of East Frisia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

February 2, 2012

Assessed

• History of the Germans in Poland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

February 1, 2012

Renamed

• November 1918 in Alsace renamed to November 1918 in Alsace-Lorraine.

Assessed

• November 1918 in Alsace-Lorraine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

January 30, 2012

Removed

• Frederick III, German Emperor (talk) removed. Quality rating was FA-Class (rev · t).
• Germany (talk) removed. Quality rating was FA-Class (rev · t).

January 9, 2012

Reassessed

• Greater Poland (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

January 3, 2012

Renamed

• Russo–Prussian alliance renamed to Russo-Prussian alliance.
• Anglo–Prussian alliance (1788) renamed to Anglo-Prussian alliance (1788).
• Anglo–Prussian alliance (1756) renamed to Anglo-Prussian alliance (1756).

Assessed

• Anglo-Prussian alliance (1756) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Anglo-Prussian alliance (1788) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Russo-Prussian alliance (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

December 30, 2011

Renamed

• Anglo-Prussian alliance (1788) renamed to Anglo–Prussian alliance (1788).
• Anglo-Prussian alliance (1756) renamed to Anglo–Prussian alliance (1756).
• Russo-Prussian alliance renamed to Russo–Prussian alliance.

Assessed

• Anglo–Prussian alliance (1756) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Anglo–Prussian alliance (1788) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Russo–Prussian alliance (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

December 26, 2011

Reassessed

• Anglo-Prussian alliance (1788) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
• Triple Alliance (1788) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

December 23, 2011

Assessed

• Karl von Grolman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

December 19, 2011

Renamed

• Anglo-Prussian Alliance renamed to Anglo-Prussian alliance (1756).

Reassessed

• Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1762) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• Anglo-Prussian alliance (1756) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Anglo-Prussian alliance (1788) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Russo-Prussian alliance (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

December 15, 2011

Assessed

• Battle of Sedan (1870) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Battle of Wörth (1870) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Breslauer Tumbler (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Ice Pigeon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Landwehr (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian Secret Police (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Sedantag (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Trakehner (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Yasnaya Polyana, Kaliningrad Oblast (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Category:Animal breeds originating in Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class (rev · t).

December 9, 2011

Assessed

• All-German Bloc/League of Expellees and Deprived of Rights (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Berlin Victory Column (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Federal Expellee Law (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• German minority in Poland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Leni Riefenstahl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Prince Henry of Prussia (1862–1929) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Princess Charlotte of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Princess Louise of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Princess Margaret of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Princess Viktoria of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Waldemar Kraft (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

December 5, 2011

Assessed

• Marie of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Princess Victoria Louise of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

December 2, 2011

Assessed

• Forced labor of Germans in the Soviet Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

November 28, 2011

Assessed

• Wałbrzych (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

November 27, 2011

Reassessed

• Old Prussians (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• Baltiysk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Prince Christian Ludwig of Prussia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

November 22, 2011

Assessed

• Hermann Goetz (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

November 17, 2011

Assessed

• Eastern Front (World War I) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Maximilian von Prittwitz (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Ogrodzieniec, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Susz (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Zabrze (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

November 16, 2011

Renamed

• Oder-Neisse line renamed to Oder–Neisse line.

Assessed

• Oder–Neisse line (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Olsztynek (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Oskar von Hindenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Tannenberg Memorial (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

November 14, 2011

Assessed

• Danzig Highflyer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• German Königsberger Colourhead (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Pomeranian Coarsewool Sheep (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Pomeranian Goose (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

November 12, 2011

Assessed

• Sabine Bethmann (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Sovetsk, Kaliningrad Oblast (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Tilsit cheese (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Category:American people of Prussian descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class (rev · t).

November 10, 2011

Reassessed

• Paul Bronsart von Schellendorff (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• Wilhelmine, Gräfin von Lichtenau (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

November 5, 2011

Renamed

• Frederick William I, Elector of Brandenburg renamed to Frederick William, Elector of Brandenburg.

Assessed

• Frederick William, Elector of Brandenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

November 1, 2011

Reassessed

• Plautdietsch language (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• Alexandra Feodorovna (Charlotte of Prussia) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Działdowo (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• German Revolution of 1918–1919 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• History of Berlin (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian Navy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian Union (Evangelical Christian Church) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Treaty of Versailles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

October 28, 2011

Assessed

• Bydgoszcz (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Dobrzyń Land (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Gdańsk Bay (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Gollub War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Hunger War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Johann Sebastian Bach (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Peace of Thorn (1411) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Polish–Teutonic War (1326–1332) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Treaty of Kalisz (1343) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Treaty of Melno (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).

October 26, 2011

Reassessed

• Plautdietsch language (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Unassessed-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

• Battle of Rossbach (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Battle of Zorndorf (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Free State of Waldeck-Pyrmont (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Otto Braun (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Pomeranian (dog) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class (rev · t).
• Preußenschlag (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Prussian blue (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Saxe-Lauenburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Ziębice (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).

October 20, 2011

Assessed

• Canton of Neuchâtel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Erich Ludendorff (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Fort de Mutzig (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• History of Germany (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Kolin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Lower Lusatia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Otto Friedrich von der Groeben (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• Pickelhaube (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t).
• Reinsurance Treaty (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t).
• Upper Lusatia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).
• World War II (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class (rev · t).