Jump to content

User talk:Nthep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for removing copyright violations[edit]

I'm DrPlantGenomics, and write wikipages for women. I also am a single parent and working while raising my children, and write pages while volunteering, i.e. I don't have much free time. I had some pages get notified for copyright violations yesterday, despite my best interests. The process of having copyright violations was rather offputting as I dip in and out of wiki editing according to work and parenting. I was about to say 'if copyright violations are the result, people with more time can edit, and I'll nominate women in science for prizes', but given you removed the violations, I am less likely to reshift my volunteering away from wiki. Many thanks. You have restored my faith in the best way to uplift other people. Also, I don't know the appropriate way to comment on other people's talk pages, so I hope this works. Many thanks again.

Wikidata weekly summary #630[edit]

Extended content

<languages/>

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2024[edit]

Delivered June 2024 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

18:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Graham Beards
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #631[edit]

Extended content

Heads up[edit]

I should be done with the Ruigeroeland CCI by the end of the year. I am going to RD1 all content published in Exotic Microlepidoptera 3 if it was published in 1930. All content from 1928 and earlier has been tagged as public domain. I will leave material from 1929 (starting page 481) alone for now in case I am somehow not done by the end of the year. Scorpions1325 (talk) 17:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Nthep (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

revision hide request[edit]

hey a few gross edits on Loki season 2 were made, I believe they may be up for a revdel. cheers! Gaismagorm (talk) 20:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think it was worthy of revdel, but certainly a block and some page protection. Nthep (talk) 10:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ah okay, thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 12:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you deleted 7 revisions from this article [1] I believe the entire chain of edits from [1229334257] to 1229529357 should be revdeleted/suppressed aswell, as it was mass addition of obviously copyrighted content by the IP and reversion thereafter.

revisions to be deleted/suppressed

Ratnahastin (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dealt with. Nthep (talk) 17:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Summary #632[edit]

Extended content

Declined revdel[edit]

Hi there. I saw you declined the revdel request at Utpal Kumar Singh. I wanted to seek feedback for future reference. Seeing the copypatrol report, there’s quite a handful of highlighted text from that revision, which is why I requested a revdel of that revision. See iThenticate report where it highlights the portions and they’re a bit significant, if my iThenticate link doesn’t work, you could just click on iThenticate from the copypatrol report. Looking forward to hearing from you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces I can't access the pdf to compare (a 503 service unavailable error) and you hadn't removed any offending text from the article so I've got nothing to make a judgement against. If you remove the offending text, then I'll look again. Nthep (talk) 16:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article was fixed already, by the creator. Yes, I couldn’t directly access the pdf but was able to via iThenticate. Anyway, maybe this isn’t necessary. Thank you for being a great admin :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanderwaalforces: Compare User talk:Deb#Utpal Kumar Singh on Deb's talk page. I'm not sure about the intentions of the creator, but this looks like unfinished business to me. Renerpho (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Renerpho Yeah, I am actually aware of that thread on Deb’s talk page and agree to an extent that this looks like an unfinished business. But since the admin declined the request, I respect that as they should know better. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Renerpho @Vanderwaalforces I declined the RD because a) I couldn't see the source to compare with, b) I couldn't tell if or what offending material had been removed, and c) which revisions need to be RD. Now if the creator is saying "whoops I included some copyright-violating stuff" then a) isn't that big a deal anymore, but me or any other admin still needs to know which revisions need to RD. I just need someone to say it was added in revision X and removed in revision Y and it can be sorted in no time. Nthep (talk) 06:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nthep, I just realized that I didn’t add the revision that needs to be revdel in my original request, please see Special:Diff/1229369845. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just to say that the current version is well below standard. I don't know what User:Aviram7 was thinking of when he moved it out of draft. But at the moment I'm in holiday mood so I'm not going to be tackling the problem. Deb (talk) 07:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't think my writings were WP:CV compliant, but I was did not actually add copyvio material to my article.Happy editing --- ᗩvírαm7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I don't understand is why it cannot be draftified again? Renerpho (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Aviram7? Renerpho (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's no technical reason against redraftifying but IIRC there is policy or guidance about not doing it, to prevent articles yo-yoing between draft and article space. Nthep (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think, with common sense though, it’s best to XfD any article if you draftify it and it gets moved back to mainspace. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #633[edit]

Extended content

User:Master of all cinemalovers and MCQ[edit]

Hi Nthep. The posts you removed from Master of all cinemalovers at MCQ were almost certainly related to one or more of the file-related notifications that have been added to their user talk page. Since every file they've uploaded seems to have had some issue, it's not clear which one or ones they're asking about. They seem to be uploading files without providing any copyright licenses and other information. Some of these might be OK as non-free content, but there are a few that likely will need to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIR etc, and that includes a basic ability to communicate. Perhaps I was a bit bitey but I'd expect some sort of question, even if they had just written "help?" I'd be more receptive. Nthep (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize if it seemed as if I was criticizing what you did. I probably would've done the same myself. FWIW, it seems some of the issues with the film posters that uploaded were resolved by another user who converted them to non-free; however, I don't see how to resolve File:Uttam Kumar receiving National Award in 1967.jpeg and I don't think it can be converted to non-free. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]