Jump to content

User talk:Nthep/Archive 74

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 70Archive 72Archive 73Archive 74Archive 75Archive 76Archive 77

Wikidata weekly summary #640

Extended content

Wikidata weekly summary #641

Extended content

2019 Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress crash

Hi,

I see you revdel'ed 2019 Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress crash. I was in the middle of reviewing that and believe this is not a copyvio. The text in question closely follows the text of the NTSB report and so would fall under public domain. The text is cited to this site which includes a link to the NTSB report. If you download the report and check the section titled "Probable Cause and Findings", you will see what I mean. Please review and let me know your opinion. Cheers! Whpq (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Whpq I thought they were quoting some blog as I didn't see the content in the NTSB report, until i've looked again and found the conclusion in the middle, rather than the end, where I was expecting it. Revision restored. Nthep (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! Whpq (talk) 19:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
This was my error, I was working through Copypatrol while tired and not paying enough attention. Thanks for catching that. Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #641

Ruigeroeland

The beast has been slain. I am also retiring from the project until my mental health stabilizes once and for all. Even if it does, I think me contributing here is a net negative for my life. Thank you for everything you have done Dancherek,Whpq, {Wizardman and everyone else. Scorpions1325 (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@Scorpions1325 congratulations and thank you for your Hurculean efforts in tracking these down. Also, thank you, for enabling my now increased knowledge of moths. Nthep (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

copyvio-revdel

Hi Nthep,

Regarding your revdel at Harry Belafonte, I think it's an over-reaction. The content appears to be a few-line excerpt rather than the majority or entirety of the song. It was cited, and and in the original addition and for the seeming majority of the time/revisions it existed, it was in support of prose-commentary. Once the prose-commentary had been deleted (apparently an editorial decision) the lyrics obviously needed to go. But I still think that's all within normal editing bounds. Given how many revisions and editors were involved in the interleaving time, I think it heads into being more disruptive for a relatively small infringement. DMacks (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@DMacks I suppose it does fall within fair-use limits. I'll put them back. Nthep (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! DMacks (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #643

Extended content

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

removed Pppery

Interface administrator changes

removed Pppery

Oversighter changes

removed Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
  • A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2024

Delivered September 2024 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

21:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.⸺(Random)staplers 17:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)