User talk:JJPMaster/Archive 3

User talk:JJPMaster/Archive 3

[edit | purge | talk | history | move | return to start]

---

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Richard Benham

Thank you for the notification. I have stripped this down to bare bones facts with publicly available references. BPJ (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough. I have now removed the G11 and replaced it with an {{advert}} tag. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 11:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

New message

Hello, JJPMaster. You have new messages at Kamilalibhat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. - Kamil Ali Bhat 🍥 ( 💭 • ✏ ) 18:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Is

this you? per this request? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Deepfriedokra, Yes. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 18:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

AFC reviewer rights

If I remember correctly, you were granted AfC reviewer rights on probation in early December - this means they will expire some time in February. Any plans on renewing it? Pahunkat (talk) 13:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Pahunkat, yes, although I have no idea how to renew it. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I think you need to request them again on the same talk page. However, I may be wrong. Pahunkat (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Pahunkat, honestly, at this point I don't even know how long my AfC probation was supposed to be, according to Primefac, who granted me the right, it will be "3-6 months". although the project page says 2 months. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Odd, I suppose you can request an extension when they expire. I was going off the project page Also, what is 'reply-link' that everyone seems to be using? Pahunkat (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Pahunkat, as for reply-link, it's a script created by Enterprisey that gives you... well... a link that allows you to reply to discussions, see User:Enterprisey/reply-link.js to install it. It doesn't work that well on Uncyclopedia. Seriously. I tried it. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

JJPMaster, I see - testing it now. Pahunkat (talk) 13:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Pahunkat, you did it! JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

JJPMaster :-) Pahunkat (talk) 14:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy non-admin closures at RfD

Why have you speedily closed discussions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2? While all the participants other than the nominator agreed (albeit one weakly) there was not an overwhelming number of them and no obvious reason for the discussions to be closed early. Thryduulf (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thryduulf, on second thought, I do agree that, especially with the one with the R from move discussion that I closed as speedy keep, I did indeed close those discussions too early, and will try to refrain from doing so in the future. I'll be honest, I don't even remember why I decided to do the RfD closes to begin with. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 16:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I saw this on my watchlist

Why did you redirect your userpage? Just curious. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 21:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanoscar21, I'm planning on redesigning my userpage to get rid of all the unnecessary userboxes/clutter, so I moved the previous content of the userpage to User:JJPMaster/old, but I was required to leave a redirect. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

That's smart. I just replaced things. Seems that you're... more organized than I am. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 21:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

New York nursing home scandal renaming

Hi, I see you renamed Andrew Cuomo's response to nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic to 2021 New York nursing home scandal. Thank you for doing so. However, if you look at the discussion, the consensus was to rename it to New York COVID-19 nursing home scandal instead of the originally suggested 2021 New York nursing home scandal. Could you switch it to the one agreed to the discussion? Kyjama (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Kyjama, thank you; I have now executed this move. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

RE: Signature

Yeah, I realized that was the problem recently, thanks. JediMasterMacaroni (Talk) 17:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

No problem! {{archive now}} JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

How to directly upload an article?

Hello, I have previously written articles for Wikipedia, and been granted permission to publish a new article without going through Afc review. I do not how to publish an article without it being reviewed beforehand - could you help me with that? If not, could you please review & publish this article that I have written, which is now pending for review: Draft: Medial Epicondyle Fracture of the Humerus.

Many thanks, Apaul291003 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@Apaul291003: The article looks pretty good to me; approved. If you want to make an article without having it approved, you can just create it directly in the article namespace and wait for a new page patroller to approve it. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@JJPMaster: How do I create it directly in the namespace? What does that mean? Thanks Apaul291003 (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Apaul291003, I mean creating an article directly, such as going to Insert page name here and adding the article there instead of going to Draft:Insert page name here and submitting it. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Halkawt Zaher

You might be interestyed in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ahmaddler and the putative sock farm surroundig drafts, articles, user pages, redirects etc on this person. I noticed you had bumped into but one example of the proliferation of... material. Fiddle Faddle 17:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit report

You must know that I entered images and submitted your article Draft:Daisy the Diesel Railcar.--General electric p30ch (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

General electric p30ch, I actually didn't create that article; I just moved it to the draft namespace. JJPMASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 11:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

I understand but I must inform you.--General electric p30ch (talk) 12:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi JJP!

Hey, I'm Hipponias from Uncyc and I've decided to join Wikipedia! (btw thanks for porting RedWarn and Huggle to Uncyc!)

Just asking, as a newbie what policy/writing pages should I read first? I know how to format and the way wikitext works so I guess learning how to cite would be a good idea.

Also, is there a link-suggest ability similar to Uncyc? I tried preferences but there were 500 other choices and I could not find it (assuming it exists). Hipponias (talk) 11:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

@Hipponias: Welcome to Wikipedia! A few policies you may want to first read are our core content policies, five pillars, and ignore all rules, followed by a few other policies such as our biographies of living people policy and civility. If you want to know how to cite, specifically read WP:V and WP:RS to understand the basics of what a reliable source is, and read WP:CITE and Help:References to understand how to cite them. And as for link suggest, it is powered by the LinkSuggest MediaWiki extension, which Wikipedia does not have installed. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 11:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Archives

Did you fix it? Atsme 💬 📧 22:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Atsme, yes. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Sorry about that - it was an archive glitch and I thought we had fixed it but I thought wrong. Atsme 💬 📧 22:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Atsme, reminds of this event. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Q for you!

How do I use ClueBot III? KingOfAllThings ^{(thou shalt chatter!)} 19:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

KingOfAllThings, add something of this form to your user talk page:

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
:| age=336
:| archiveprefix=User talk:KingOfAllThings/Archive
:| numberstart=3
:| maxarchsize=75000
:| header={{Automatic archive navigator}}
:| minkeepthreads=5
:| minarchthreads=2
:| format= %%i

}} JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

JJPMaster, thanks! Also, can other editors make predictions on your page? KingOfAllThings ^{(thou shalt chatter!)} 21:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Sure! JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

@KingOfAllThings: Also note that I've moved it to Wikipedia:Predictions. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 21:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates

Hi, due to quirks in the way that Wikipedia parses javascript pages, curly braces are parsed as templates, unless they are inside of <nowiki>...</nowiki>, <pre>...</pre>, <syntaxhighlight>...</syntaxhighlight> ... As a result of this, your script page, User:JJPMaster/RWS.js, is generating links in Special:WantedTemplates (in particular links to Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:RWTEXT and Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:RWTEXT\). Recently, an interface editor attempted to fix this by adding <nowiki> at the top and </nowiki> at the bottom of your script page. This didn't work because you already have <nowiki>...</nowiki> on that page. It would be great if you could add <syntaxhighlight>...</syntaxhighlight> tags (you don't have these) at the top and bottom of your page like this which will prevent your page from generating links in Special:WantedTemplates. Thanks for your help! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 14:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your edits to the RexxS case page

Please don't edit closed case pages, especially to make changes to the final decision. I have reverted you as changes to final decisions usually require arbitrator motions. If you wish to ask for a change on the case page you should make a request at the talk page for the case, with what you want changed and reasons why you think it needs to be changed. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Floyd The Barber

Hi. It's been a few months, I took a break, and decided to finish the page. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Floyd_the_Barber_(Nirvana_Song) I hope this is good enough! 26 March 2021 BoxxyBoy (talk)

BoxxyBoy, the article LGTM, however I think it would be better to merge the article to Bleach (Nirvana album), because the source's generally reference the album as a whole, instead of the song specifically. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 01:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I get what you are saying, and the page still could use a couple additions, which i am working on as we speak, but is a song such as floyd the barber, which the band considered their first big hit, less deserving of a page than, say, endless nameless (talk) March 26, 09:58.

YASHIA

Composser45:1001 2601:245:8200:7E90:5D8E:89D4:7B38:8416 (talk) 10:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

JJP_Master 23:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of a joke AfD you created for April Fools' 2021

Hi, I'm letting you know that I've nominated a joke AfD nomination you created for deletion, as it didn't get significant participation on April Fools'. You can participate in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Unfunny AfDs from April Fools 2021. Thanks you. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

FYI

I recently created the following userbox if you want to display it on your User page:

This User went through the rigors of WP:NPP school and graduated!!

Atsme 💬 📧 15:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Psssst

You may want to update the gender marker on User:JJPublic, just saying. {{emoji|laugheline}} Casspedia (talk) 19:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Casspedia, consider it  Done. JJPublic (talk) 19:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello JJPMaster:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello JJPMaster,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

"List of schools, colleges and universities" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of schools, colleges and universities. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#List of schools, colleges and universities until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

(I think you did a great move but I'd just like to clear the redirect that was left. More or less have to notify you as I've raised at RfD. Thanks) Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:On Wikipedia

Template:On Wikipedia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFX^talk 11:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:ALLHAILMASTERFERRET" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:ALLHAILMASTERFERRET and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Wikipedia:ALLHAILMASTERFERRET until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 20:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

...

Hello, my shadow-self. –JJP ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

MJL, I'm sorry, what? MJL_Master 00:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

I no longer respond to that name anymore. My memories came back; I never was MJL. It was you all along..
You have stolen my identity! Vengeance will be mine!! (edit conflict) –JJP ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
134		Tallaght (talk)	Add sources
83		ALT Linux (talk)	Add sources
590		Blink (browser engine) (talk)	Add sources
217		NixOS (talk)	Add sources
930		Vue.js (talk)	Add sources
61		CRUX (talk)	Add sources
123		Linux Lite (talk)	Cleanup
3,388		Reliance Industries (talk)	Cleanup
533		Comparison of Linux distributions (talk)	Cleanup
6,181		Google Chrome (talk)	Expand
3,309		Computer network (talk)	Expand
1,323		Anaphylaxis (talk)	Expand
547		Wine (software) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
254		Minecraft modding (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
210		Ionic (mobile app framework) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
296		SUSE Linux (talk)	Merge
169		SUSE Linux Enterprise (talk)	Merge
3,037		Narcissistic personality disorder (talk)	Merge
749		History of McDonald's (talk)	Wikify
58		Criticism of Windows XP (talk)	Wikify
2,282		Kubernetes (talk)	Wikify
5		Social Emergency Medicine (talk)	Orphan
2		History of computing in South America (talk)	Orphan
40		Labile hypertension (talk)	Orphan
184		Gerrit (software) (talk)	Stub
334		Svelte (talk)	Stub
3		Arak University of Technology (talk)	Stub
22		Uruk GNU/Linux (talk)	Stub
39		LXLE Linux (talk)	Stub
27		Medium specificity (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

"Brice Creek ((Trent River tributary)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Brice Creek ((Trent River tributary) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 7#Brice Creek ((Trent River tributary) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your talkpage and userpage look terrible

They hurt my eyes. ARandomPage (talk • contribs) 01:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

ARandomPage, it's good to know that I succeeded. JJP_Master 19:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing JJPMaster a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 12:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy First Edit Day!

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:COPYPATROL" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:COPYPATROL and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 24 § Wikipedia:CopyPatrol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:23, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

"Template:Condense" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Template:Condense has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24 § Template:Condense until a consensus is reached. Mach61 (talk) 04:40, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Brice Creek (Trent River tributary" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Brice Creek (Trent River tributary has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Brice Creek (Trent River tributary until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

	The Working Woman's Barnstar
	This award is given in recognition to JJPMaster for collecting at least 10 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

"Back to the front" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Back to the front has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 22 § Back to the front until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maya Georgieva (Q12286339)

A tag has been placed on Maya Georgieva (Q12286339), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy First Edit Day!

Bibliography: publications about Orville Peck

Dear JJPMaster; thank you for your wiki-contributions. Just like yourself, I learn something new about Wiki-World almost everyday. Today you will learn about bibliographic articles:

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bibliographies Please take a look at another bibliographic article, that I contributed to recently: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/John_Mearsheimer_bibliography .

I respectfully ask you to restore my article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:List_of_publications_about_Orville_Peck , so that other wiki-editors can contribute to improving it. This article will be listed/formatted as a bibliography article.

Thank you in advance, Walter Tau Walter Tau (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

@Walter Tau: A few things. Firstly, I was not aware that bibliographies could be lists of publications about people before now, so thank you for that. However, your article still cannot be accepted (note that I have not deleted it; just declined it at Articles for Creation, so you can resubmit it at any time), for a few reasons:

1. Your article, as it stands, fails to demonstrate that it passes the notability criterion for stand-alone lists, since the only citations are the publications themselves. That criterion says that any list, including a bibliography, must demonstrate that the group in question has received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject (sig/cov). To quote from the guideline:

   Topical bibliographies are lists of relevant books, journals and other references on a specific topic. The lead of a topical bibliography should establish the notability of the bibliography by citing at least two sources that demonstrate that relevant books, journals and other references on a specific topic have been discussed as a group. (emphasis mine)

   In other words, you must not demonstrate that individual members of the collection have sig/cov, but that the collection as a whole does.
2. I stand by my decline of the article as violating What Wikipedia is not, since it appears that the list was compiled directly from some database, and includes seemingly every publication on the topic, including many duplicates. You have as yet failed to demonstrate that your article does not improperly use Wikipedia as an indiscriminate collection of information, as I alleged in my comment while declining the article.

However, I have partially reversed my renaming of the page after rereading the relevant guidelines. Either way, you can continue to make edits to the draft article, since it has not been deleted, and resubmit it if you wish. And if you wish for an impartial opinion, I suggest that you ask on the Articles for Creation help desk. JJP_Master (she/they) 15:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

@JJPMaster: thank you for getting back to me quickly. Today I learned, that there are notability criteria for bibliographic articles. A "list of his songs" would definitely meet the notability criteria (and it is provided in the article itself https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Orville_Peck#References), but I am less sure about a "list of publications about him" would qualify.

However, I came up with another idea: if you scroll down this webpage https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Lady_Gaga , you will see a "Literary sources" section. These are publications about Lady Gaga, which are not cited in the article. This list is limited to what the editor thought were the most important publications - it is not an exhausting list. What do you think about making a similar small "Literary sources" section for Orville Peck? Walter Tau (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

@Walter Tau: That likely would be fine, and I advise that you be bold. However, if your addition is reverted, you should come to a consensus on the talk page (Talk:Lady Gaga). JJP_Master (she/they) 18:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

JJPMaster, Walter Tau: If I may ... that section at Lady Gaga seems to me to be mistitled. It's a list of book sources. In any case, the proposed list of sources about Orville Peck is entirely or almost entirely journalism/magazines/fansites. If there are any extended treatments of him in books that are in there and haven't been used as references in the article, they should be used that way, not simply listed; but are there any? Walter Tau has been bold multiple times. There's an existing section at Talk:Orville Peck (which I think is what you meant to link to, JJPMaster), where Walter Tau has responded once. Walter Tau, if you can find any good sources about Peck within that list of database hits that are not yet cited in the article, please list them in that section. Since not everyone has access to the databases, that would be really useful. Yngvadottir (talk) 02:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

@Yngvadottir: I wasn’t aware of the prior talk page discussion, so thank you for showing me that. So, Walter Tau, please seek consensus on Talk:Orville Peck before adding any of these sources en masse. And if you end up adding it, please read our guideline on external links first, and please do not just copy your full draft in there, since my points about Wikipedia not being a directory still stand. JJP_Master (she/they) 02:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prunus cathybrownae has been accepted

Prunus cathybrownae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Isnamademecry (talk) 19:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

where u from?:?? im from israel and pakistan wbu

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for helping out across Articles for Creation - your work here never goes unappreciated :-). Cheers. LR.127 (talk) 14:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Biased removal of content?

Hi how are you? I recently had an edit instantly removed by you as you claimed it was "Not helpful" the irony being it was a detailed breakdown on a conspiracy. Let me ask, were you the initial poster of the conspiracy? How is any claims referencing a memecoin to a government department allowed on here? I'd love for some rationality from your side. 120.22.151.155 (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Although I do agree that there is no conspiracy like that, I removed it nevertheless. Three reasons:

1. You did not provide any reliable sources for the existence of this as a major conspiracy theory,
2. You wrote it in a very non-neutral tone, using loaded political language, and
3. Even if this were a real conspiracy theory and written neutrally, it likely would not belong in the lead of the article, as we at Wikipedia try to avoid giving undue weight to fringe theories.

Meanwhile, the part that you removed, namely, that DOGE is a backronym for Dogecoin, is undisputed. JJP_Master (she/they) 03:16, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

That's fine, when i first started the edit the conspiracy was there directly stating it was a "pump and dump" so i addressed the statement and provided insight. Which is what i thought this place was about. "DOGE is a backronym" IT is not though, look at any government acronym and their names, do you mean to tell me FBI is a backronym for 'fining black individuals' ? If you check the edit history you will see somebody had wrote it was pump and dump, while i was editing you must have changed it to the doge backronym.

anyway appreciate your response, cheers. 120.22.220.169 (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

I can't seem to find any edit alleging such a conspiracy in the page history. And as for DOGE being a backronym, that claim in the article is sourced, so you will likely need consensus on Talk:Department of Government Efficiency before removing it. JJP_Master (she/they) 03:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)