User talk:JJPMaster/Archive 2
User talk:JJPMaster/Archive 2
[edit | purge | talk | history | move | return to start]
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
LinBi
This page should not be speedily deleted because it details the results of an EU-funded project which significantly contributed to the distribution of scientific (i.e. factual) data within the European public space. Such data is relevant to the ongoing effort of the EU to increase public awareness of the intrinsic interconnection of the development of the human species and biological reality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcoboi (talk • contribs) 11:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
DeWine and Whitmer were not tried for impeachment
Three edits:
- Decline G10; Mike DeWine was tried for impeachment at some point; the redirect does not imply that she was convicted.
- Decline G10; Gretchen Whitmer was tried for impeachment at some point; the redirect does not imply that she was convicted.
- Readded info about impeachment; whether or not it passed does not matter.
Please indicate a reliable source that DeWine was tried for impeachment.
Please indicate a reliable source that Whitmer was tried for impeachment.
All sources in the articles indicate that there were no hearings, and the proposals were met with widespread condemnation by the leaders of both legislatures, as well as by national media. Neither was calendared, and no votes were taken.
You also posted a notice on my Talk, complaining about my edit summaries:
I noticed that you recently removed content from Gretchen Whitmer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary.
My edit summary is clear and cogent:
Also, this was rather thoroughly discussed in two sections of Talk:Gretchen Whitmer:
- Talk:Gretchen Whitmer#"See Also" link to non-existent "Impeachment Proceedings" article
- Talk:Gretchen Whitmer#Impeachment resolution of November 2020
Your revert also damaged an intervening edit by DGG.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 13:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- William Allen Simpson, I removed your G10 tags because the redirects were not inflammatory. The redirect may be misleading, but it is not inflammatory. A resolution was created, but not passed, however, that does not make it non-notable, and that does not mean that you can simply remove all information about it from the article. Thank you. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi JJPMaster! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Request on 09:54:42, 22 December 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Bossmom89
Bossmom89 (talk) 09:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Bossmom89: I'm afraid I do not understand what you need help with, could you please clarify? Also, I believe that you meant to post this at the AfC help desk, so please consider doing that. Thank you! JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Reformed vandal?
I noticed that userbox - really? How, where and what account? Sorry, that's the first time I've seen such a userbox. Pahunkat (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pahunkat, I added that there because I used to create G3 articles, even though I did not vandalize per se. I don't think I actually ever told anyone that this account is actually a clean start account, after User:Jjp2008, which I abandoned back in 2015.
- See also: User:JJPMaster/Joshua's number for the first article that got G3'd, User:JJPMaster/Hacker.io for an A7 article I made, and .blog for a G3 article that I made that got wikified and converted to being a somewhat good article. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 14:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough - a clean start's perfectly acceptable and you're already an AfC participant, teahouse host, etc... Glad to have you here, and merry Christmas! Pahunkat (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Stonehenge_%28sun%29.jpg/150px-Stonehenge_%28sun%29.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/WB_229_tankard.jpg/66px-WB_229_tankard.jpg)
Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Covid-19-ct.webp
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Copyright-excl.svg/70px-Copyright-excl.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Covid-19-ct.webp. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg/80px-Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg.png)
Hi JJPMaster. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- You did quite good work during your trial run, but I do want to draw your attention to one significant error that I believe you made: Franco-Turkish proxy conflict. While marking it as non-neutral is a step in the right direction, my assessment is that this article is a prime example of original research. None of the cited sources directly mention a proxy conflict between Turkey and France, and my search for scholarly coverage of the same turned up nil. It's possible that I'll be proven wrong at the AfD, which I only just opened, but even if the article is kept, this is a situation where you should at least be tagging the article with {{original research}}, and I believe that an AfD nomination would have been the more correct course of action. signed, Rosguill talk 19:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Holiday Cheers!
Happy Holidays!
| |
Snow.
A meltdown. 🔔🎁⛄️🎅🏻 Thank you for your hard work and for being such a great NPP trainee! |
Humor
The sanity of anyone who puts "The sanity of this user is disputed" on their user page is not in doubt, it is clearly absent. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 17:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Davidwr, I can confirm that. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 17:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Deletion
Hi JJPMaster,
Would you mind going in a bit more detail as to why you think the Indian Reunification Association should be deleted.
Kind regards, AMomen88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMomen88 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- @AMomen88: I at first thought that your article should be deleted as I believed that it did not adequately explain why its subject was important, but, you have fixed the article to an extent, therefore my reasons for deletion no longer apply. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 20:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks :-)
I wanted to thank you for the very nice comment you put for me on Wikipedia:A nice cup of tea and a sit down. In fact, I've never heard of that Wikipedia page until I saw your comment there (well... maybe I have, but I haven't been there recently). I just wanted to let you know that I really appreciate it and it put a smile on my face. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Aargh
I've draftified Draft:Rasool Hamad Ameen just as you've tagged it for speedy deletion. Pahunkat (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pahunkat, I noticed that, it was weird. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yep. Now what do we do? Move it back to mainspace or remove the CSD tag? Pahunkat (talk)
- Or the author removed it. Pahunkat (talk) 16:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pahunkat, The page was almost completely blank before it was draftified, so I don't think that leaving it in draftspace really makes sense, although the content of the article was "coming soon", but I don't know if that means "the subject of this article will come soon", or "the article itself will come soon". If the article does come soon, then we can leave it in draftspace. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- I took it as "I'm going to create the article soon" so moved it to draftspace to let them make it, though the editor has created quite a few non-notable articles. Pahunkat (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pahunkat, ...and now it's been G7'd. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 18:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yep. I really ought to apply for NPP rights one day, to actually approve pages rather than draftify or speedy them only. Pahunkat (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pahunkat, ...and now it's been G7'd. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 18:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- I took it as "I'm going to create the article soon" so moved it to draftspace to let them make it, though the editor has created quite a few non-notable articles. Pahunkat (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pahunkat, The page was almost completely blank before it was draftified, so I don't think that leaving it in draftspace really makes sense, although the content of the article was "coming soon", but I don't know if that means "the subject of this article will come soon", or "the article itself will come soon". If the article does come soon, then we can leave it in draftspace. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, JJPMaster,
You've recently been opening threads on the Administrators' Noticeboard for nonimportant matters. They seem to be issues where you could get an answer to your questions if you just conferred with any experienced admin on their user talk page and they don't need to be posted on a high profile noticeboard. I don't know if you have suddenly developed an interest in admin matters or are considering having an RfA but before posting a complaint again, please consider whether it needs the attention of the whole admin community or whether it could be resolved in a discussion on an admin talk page. Posting cases that could be considered trivial can result in drawing negative attention towards the OP which I'm sure is the last thing you want to happen. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Liz: I assume that you are referring to the open proxy thing, which I agree should’ve been posted at the help desk, and I honestly don’t know why I posted it at AN, and I understand your concern, however, if you are referring to the non-transcluded RfA thing, I don’t know where else I should’ve posted that. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm going to add on to Liz' comment; you've been asking a lot of questions where the answer is either obvious, or can be determined by thinking about the matter for a while. You haven't quite yet hit the point of being disruptive, but I think it would behoove you to slow down a bit and maybe observe first, edit second, and ask questions third. There are a lot of important areas on Wikipedia, but you don't need to be actively involved in all of them. Primefac (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
SPI archives
Please don't edit the SPI archives, as you did in this edit. The archives are for the exclusive use of the SPI clerks and checkusers. Thanks.
- I'm sorry, I didn't notice that the discussion was archived. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 23:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
![]() |
Happy New Year! |
Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/TWA_guide_left_bottom.png)
- Hi JJPMaster! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:22, Tuesday, January 5, 2021 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Comedic tastes
I saw the new addition to your user page. So, Taylor Swift's song grew fingers and now edits a page about some Wikipedia editor on that other web site? I knew AI was advanced but I didn't know it was that advanced. It looks like you got owned. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Davidwr, I agree that I got owned, but I actually got WP:OWNED. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 18:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
What about anonymous pirates?
Regarding this, what about Arrr-anons? 🏴☠️ davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Davidwr, So... Aranon... a ran on... a ran on what? And who is A?!? The one whose global renamer privileges were revoked? Or are you forgetting a few letters? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 20:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for helping out at User talk:Realjamesh. I should have realized that the socks would attack that page after extended-confirmed was given to the main article, so really sorry for that. You may want to see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EunikaSylviane. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 21:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Pahunkat, no problem. I honestly thought that I was on the verge of getting blocked for edit warring before I remembered what I was doing. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 21:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- You'll encounter lots of persistent vandals during anti-vandal patrols. I've been having ones at Jimmy Rave (most memorable, you don't want to see the revdel'd material) and Addition (most recent). Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Pahunkat,
- "Added content" (-5,720) JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I guess their addition is not the best :-) Pahunkat (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- You'll encounter lots of persistent vandals during anti-vandal patrols. I've been having ones at Jimmy Rave (most memorable, you don't want to see the revdel'd material) and Addition (most recent). Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- And in a dramatic turn of events, all socks have been blocked in one go and will soon be locked :-) Pahunkat (talk) 12:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Redwarn
Hey. I noticed you had created this javascript on vi.wiki. I had tried to install the same code but nothing happened. Is there a way to install Redwarn on other(s) wikis? Thank you. 3 ▪ 14 12:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nguyenhai314, basically, I installed RedWarn globally by adding it to my global.js on Meta.
- The code is mw.loader.load('//wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:RedWarn/.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- I installed the code. It created the same code as you on local wiki, but nothing happens :)))) 3 ▪ 14 13:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nguyenhai314, what do you mean by "nothing happens"? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, my English is very bad. I mean I can't use Redwarn on vi.wiki, even after installed the code. There's a preference to save settings, but nothing appears then. Hope you understand :))) 3 ▪ 14 13:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nguyenhai314, did you scroll down and press the save button? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, my English is very bad. I mean I can't use Redwarn on vi.wiki, even after installed the code. There's a preference to save settings, but nothing appears then. Hope you understand :))) 3 ▪ 14 13:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nguyenhai314, what do you mean by "nothing happens"? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- I installed the code. It created the same code as you on local wiki, but nothing happens :)))) 3 ▪ 14 13:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. And It created a javascript page with config.js, same as you, but there's no RW icon. 3 ▪ 14 13:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nguyenhai314, by RW icon, do you mean the icons with like a lock and dots that you usually see in the upper right corner? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what I mean. Oh... I've just clicked on an article and see those icons, but they don't appear on recenly changes. Okay. Thank you very much ^_^ 3 ▪ 14 13:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you please review my article
Hello,
I just recently published an article called Torus Fractures - which are the most common fractures in children. Could you please check it out, let me know if it has flaws, and if not, publish it as a live article?
Thanks, Apaul291003 (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Apaul291003, Done, but please do not contact various AfC reviewers at once in order to ask someone to review your article. Thank you. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- JJPMaster Thanks so much! I appreciate it! Apaul291003 (talk) 18:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Lang Leav (Criticism Section Revision)
This section is not entirely accurate and is more opinion based rather than being objective. It does not include any of the positive critique from numerous world renowned and recognised media publications and focuses mainly only on the negative narrative. From sources that have doubtful academic or sound journalistic credentials. If this is to be an honest, balanced and a fair interpretation for Lang Leav, this section needs revision or to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.49.254 (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- The main reason I reverted your edit was because you didn't explain why you deleted the whole section. If you believe that the section is biased, start a discussion on the talk page to request comments from other editors. If you want a quicker reply, consider posting about it on the biographies of living persons noticeboard. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 23:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Twitter suspensions edits
Hi JJPMaster, you reverted my edit to the Twitter suspensions page based on the lack of neutrality of my edit, where I used the label "far-right." I used that label because that was the label used on that particular person's Wikipedia article, where he is called a "far-right activist." Either that article is wrong, or I'm wrong. Just thought you should know, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:AD03:E9CA:443F:3316:9060:35D6 (talk) 01:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- I failed to realize that, I have reverted my reversion of your edit. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 01:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Rollback in a kind of gift wrapper
![]() Hi JJPMaster. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
Congratulations!
![]() |
CVU Academy Graduate |
Congratulations from both myself and all of the instructors at the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy on your successful completion of the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy. You completed your final exam with a score of 99%. Well done!
It has been a pleasure working with you this past week or so, and thank you for offering to help out in removing vandalism from the project's articles. If you ever need any advice or assistance in the future, you're always welcome on my talk page. Hope to see you around! Thanoscar21talkcontributions 22:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
Wow, I must say, finishing the entire program in one day must be some sort of record. Congrats! Thanoscar21talkcontributions 22:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- And, by the way, your TP notice is quite nice. I may steal and modify it. Thanoscar21talkcontributions 22:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanoscar21, I guess this thing falls under the "send WikiLove" category, therefore you are allowed to stay here for as long as you want. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanoscar21, I also forgot to mention: my NPP training took just a little over a week, and now my CVU/A training was... just a little over a day. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Well, my CVUA training took a solid month. I guess scoring 901 on the test helped in replying so quickly. Also, since I stole it from you, I think I'm obligated to share it with you. If you ever have questions, drop a line and I'll answer! Cheers, Thanoscar21talkcontributions 23:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Congrats JJPMaster! That's the fastest I've ever seen someone graduating from CVUA :-) Pahunkat (talk) 17:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Courtesy trouting
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
(I wanted to test if I could get Twinkle to effectively automate trouting and you looked like a good target. the answer was "no", sadly) Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/48px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- (To be fair, you have noticed this yourself and moved the page; I only deleted the remaining redirect. I personally think its content is still unnecessarily focused on one specific living person, taking the person as an example for discouraged behavior, but it probably doesn't qualify for deletion.) Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- ToBeFree, I created that page in response to a very specific incident caused by that living person, but I understand if you think it is a BLP violation. I have userfied the essay so that I can continue to work on it more effectively. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 02:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly, looking at the oldiffs, it doesn't seem to be G10'able and I'm also not sure that it's discouraged behavior. JJPMaster just wrote about an incident that's similar to Vandalism on Wikipedia#Stephen Colbert, albeit in a harsher tone. Thanoscar21talkcontributions 03:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- ToBeFree, I created that page in response to a very specific incident caused by that living person, but I understand if you think it is a BLP violation. I have userfied the essay so that I can continue to work on it more effectively. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 02:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/TWA_guide_left_bottom.png)
- Hi JJPMaster! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:19, Tuesday, January 19, 2021 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/TWA_guide_left_bottom.png)
- Hi JJPMaster! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:19, Tuesday, January 19, 2021 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Trouted
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 2601:280:4001:3710:2107:E1E1:E2A2:B3F4 (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
hi ewhfupw hpiufpiooeofvhworfhw fhuwioe hfwfhwuerif fowihfrewiofhewfjbhjewbbvhbewjkbhjwc weryf gwbhcdhhvvfgehwkdjbfhhhhhhgbvnbnfdhjnfdhcjfndchfbdcnhfbvcn fhvbcnfhvbcnhbvfffcncv bvcnfhcb n hjdfcnx fcm rgfdjkfg hdjk