Talk:India Ferrah/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 17:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Under "Early life" and "Personal life" you refer to Ferrah as "he", but the "Career" section refers to India Ferrah as "she". . — Maile (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, Please look again. In the "Early life" and "Personal life" sections, I refer to "Richardson" to "he", and in the "Career" section I refer to Ferrah as "she". I know this can be a bit confusing, but right now the standard for drag performers on Wikipedia is to use preferred pronouns for individuals in- and out-of drag. There have been many discussions about this, and I'm curious if User:Armadillopteryx might care to provide a summary or current status of those discussions? In short, I'd say this article is consistent with other drag queens articles, if that helps with your GA review. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Under "Early life" and "Personal life" you refer to Ferrah as "he", but the "Career" section refers to India Ferrah as "she". . — Maile (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Thank you for the clarification. — Maile (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- Needs sourcing for 2011 Drag Race television — Maile (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, The article's prose says "India Ferrah competed on the third season (2011) of RuPaul's Drag Race" and has a citation. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Needs sourcing for 2011 Drag Race television — Maile (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This easily passes review. Thank you for your quick responses. Good luck. — Maile (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.