User talk:PeleYoetz

Welcome!

Hello, PeleYoetz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rahio 1234 08:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haim Nisim Abulafia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Haim Nisim Abulafia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 13:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PeleYoetz. Thank you for your work on U. Nahon Museum of Italian Jewish Art. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for translating this page! Please note that you are required to provide attribution when translating from sister Wikipedia projects. See Help:Translation to learn how to do so.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 09:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from U. Nahon Museum of Italian Jewish Art to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Broc (talk) 09:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for taking the time to write me and go through the article PeleYoetz (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Food and drink

Hello, PeleYoetz.

You are invited to join WikiProject Food and drink, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of food, drink and cuisine topics.
Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. You can also sign up to receive project newsletters and notifications at the notifications list, even if you choose not to join. Rrjmrrr (talk) 15:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, i'm in. PeleYoetz (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK nomination

This is to inform you that I have begun the review process of your DYK, in the article Architects' Tombs. Please address the issues raised in my review.Davidbena (talk) 03:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PeleYoetz. Thank you for your work on Cuisine of Jerusalem. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Lovely article and very nicely put together!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 16:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Cuisine of Jerusalem

Hello! Your submission of Cuisine of Jerusalem at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — 48 JCL 12:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Jerusalem

Wikipedia:WikiProject Jerusalem, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Jerusalem and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Jerusalem during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 15:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 16:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Architects' Tombs

Hello! Your submission of Architects' Tombs at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli allegations against UNRWA

Considering that your first ever edit to the article is a revert against a talk page consensus without even participating in those discussions, I am interested to know what brought you to the article? Selfstudier (talk) 10:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I came across information online saying that the un confirmed some unrwa staff involvement in the October 7 massacres. I searched for more information online and then found this relevant article. I noticed that the article included a biased title and a lengthy list of controversies that seemed unrelated to the main topic. Then I realized these additions were made on the same day so I reverted them. Can such a limited discussion with three people supporting then reverted by two opposing really be considered a consensus? This seems really strange to me that this is how we define consensus. PeleYoetz (talk) 09:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussions have not been "limited" and have been taking place for some time, which you would know had you bothered to read any of the talk page before blindly reverting based on a POV. Nearly all of the additions relate to Israeli allegations against UNRWA so that's not correct either. In future, maybe familarize yourself properly with the history of a page before barging in and making hasty ill considered edits. As I have commented in the ongoing RM, I find it odd that both yourself and another editor, both new to the page, never having edited there before, show up at the same time to reinforce each others opinion and make the same revert. Selfstudier (talk) 09:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#O.maximov. Levivich (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cuisine of Jerusalem

On 10 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cuisine of Jerusalem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the cuisine of Jerusalem reflects a blend of Jewish culinary traditions, including Sephardic, Kurdish, Ashkenazi, as well as Palestinian Arab traditions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cuisine of Jerusalem. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cuisine of Jerusalem), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is PeleYoetz. Thank you. Levivich (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

prior accounts

Have you used any other account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 05:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Referral from the Artibration Enforcement noticeboard regarding behavior in Palestine-Israel articles and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks,

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recanati winery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kitāb al-ṭabīẖ

On 4 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kitāb al-ṭabīẖ, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kitāb al-ṭabīẖ, a medieval Andalusian cookbook, contains an early version of Jewish challah bread (pictured), which traveled with Jews expelled from Spain and likely influenced Ashkenazi cuisine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kitāb al-Ṭabikh fī al-Maghrib wa al-Andalus fī ʽAṣr al-Muwaḥḥidīn, li-muʽallif majhūl. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kitāb al-ṭabīẖ), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second Intifada

I am still waiting for your answer: [1]. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Communication is not optional

If you make any further reverts to Second Intifada without first engaging in discussion, or if you revert on any other ARBPIA pages without engaging in discussion you will be topic banned. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish, I think you're not coming good on PeleYoetz. Communication is important but this is an escalation of wording, and possibly unfair punishment. That PeleYoetz is new and knows the rules less is just extra reason to explain to the user in the proper way. This is especially strange when much worse violations from experienced editors go ignored. Communication is not optional, but it must be done in an engaging way that helps the user without scaring the user, especially when this is the first time ever PeleYoetz is even contacted by an admin. ABHammad (talk) 11:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please. Stop with the nonsense. PeleYoetz is not new and is well aware of all of the rules. She is an extremely experienced editor with over 70,000 edits. She has never been a big communicator. Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What??? PeleYoetz (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I am curious to know how PeleYoetz responded just 18 minutes after ABHammad somehow appeared here despite having never interacted with PeleYoetz on their talk page, and after having ignored talk page messages and pings for at least six days. Can both of you explain? Makeandtoss (talk) 12:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not even understand the question. I arrived here just like others arrived here. You are being rude.

@ScottishFinnishRadish Look what is happening here. Aspersion casting on steroids. It begins with asking a user not to deal with a subject (see Golan Heights), it continues with accusing a user that the user is a user with 70,000 edits. And now asking this rude question "ABHammad somehow appeared here despite having never interacted with PeleYoetz on their talk page". I am asking you to intervene. ABHammad (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had notified SFR about PeleYoetz's behavior, so, no, you did not arrive here "like others." I am still waiting for an explanation on how you arrived here, and how a response was made 18 minutes later? I am not casting any aspersions, I am assuming good faith by asking legitimate questions, as maybe there are other explanations. Makeandtoss (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee, Seraphimblade, Newyorkbrad, and Ealdgyth: I'm pinging you all as you were involved in the closing of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive333#Makeandtoss and M.Bitton where we issued warning that, per Seraphimblade's wording is very final, and anything else like this is going to mean sanctions. This isn't terribly severe aspersion casting, but it is casting aspersions. I'd like to give others an opportunity to give their opinion before I act. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we're just talking about the pointy questions Makeandtoss is asking here, I'm not sure it actually rises to the level of battleground behavior, unless there's something I'm missing? Valereee (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ABHammad seems to have lumped several issues they or PeleYoetz are facing with several editors across several articles into one comment; I have nothing to do with any of them aside from the questions I posed here. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not lumping anything, @Makeandtoss, I think your above comments are aspersions castings that only join more examples from recent weeks such as the reinstation of reverted edits [2], undiscussed controversial moves, [3], general aggressive battleground mentality in discussions [4] [5], and selective removal of sourced content [6]. ABHammad (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think pointed questions have to have some evidence aside from "also showed up at a discussion another random editor showed up at." Maybe I'm a bit sensitive to the socking accusations, but asking Now I am curious to know how PeleYoetz responded just 18 minutes after ABHammad somehow appeared here despite having never interacted with PeleYoetz on their talk page, and after having ignored talk page messages and pings for at least six days. Can both of you explain? is just saying "I think you're coordinating off-wiki," which is casting aspersions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree that it's casting aspersions. But is it battleground behavior worthy of a topic ban? I'm not sure it is, but I'm also not going to object to another admin deciding it is. Valereee (talk) 18:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish, in addition to my above diffs, I think you should check this too. Makeandtoss has now also approved an ARBPIA DYK despite it being sourced to problematic sources and fails neutrality. ABHammad (talk) 08:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See escalation of commitment. Your strategy does not maximize the overall benefit to Wikipedia in my view. You are not helping PeleYoetz. Sometimes it's best to say nothing. Sean.hoyland (talk) 12:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amnesia? Try to stay out of trouble. Do it for Wikipedia. Sean.hoyland (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @ScottishFinnishRadish, I am sorry I didn't answer before, I honestly did not have much time since then and has made only a couple of edits since that revert. Anyway I do make an effort to engage in discussions, and I'll make sure in the future that I don't revert without doing so. PeleYoetz (talk) 12:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PY, 'the future' should start right now by responding to the questions you've been asked at Second Intifada and Golan Heights. If you aren't willing to respond to pings in this topic area, you probably should not be editing in this topic area and you absolutely should not be reverting in this topic area. Valereee (talk) 09:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Valereee, I apologize for the late response, I've been a bit busy recently. I understand that Wikipedia is voluntary, so I wasn't aware there was an expectation for immediate replies. Did I violate any rules? PeleYoetz (talk) 06:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing is voluntary, but when you edit after someone has expressed a concern without responding to those concerns, you're arguably being disruptive. Communication is necessary in a collaborative atmosphere. You can't simply ignore other editors. Valereee (talk) 15:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And for the record, I'd certainly recommend you respond at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Statement_by_PeleYoetz. Arbitrators are unlikely to take "I was busy" as an excuse when you've made nearly 100 edits since being informed of it a month ago. Arbitrators can and do block or topic ban people who don't bother to show up at Arbitration. Appealing such a block/ban is not a piece of cake. Valereee (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New motion in the arbitration enforcement referral

Hello PeleYoetz. In the arbitration enforcement referral regarding Palestine-Israel articles, there is a new motion proposed which pertains to you. The motion would open a new arbitration case with you as a party. If you wish, you may comment on the motion. If a case is opened, you will have an opportunity to submit evidence at that time. SilverLocust 💬 23:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you receive pings?

Hello PeleoYoetz, I'm wondering if you receive pings from article talk pages. For example, you were pinged here to explain something you added to the lead, but you never responded. Likewise, I pinged you here and here about your edits, but you didn't respond there either.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 13:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, well, I thought that these pings didn't look very much like you're asking for my opinion, but more like a general complaint on me. PeleYoetz (talk) 07:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're going through here

Regarding this [7]. I think you are totally right. Levivich should have apologized for putting words in your mouth - you never said what they claimed you did, and all the later comments from them are... completely disrespectful. What will you do now? Will you take this to AE? ABHammad (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @ABHammad, I really don't know what to tell you. I'm just always attacked. One day they joke that someone should tell me what to edit and what not. The next day they say I'm a sock puppet of this, then of that, then that I am part of a team tagging, and now this, with people claiming I said something I never said. and it's more or less always the same people. I feel like I am haunted here. PeleYoetz (talk) 12:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand... the situation on Wikipedia is really concerning, there so many issues that need fixing. Some people have noticed this, and I hope that more people from the community, not just the regulars, will start to intervene. ABHammad (talk) 11:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cuisine of Jerusalem

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cuisine of Jerusalem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a human here. I've completed my review and am just waiting for your inputs. Most of the points are small and should be easily fixed; there's one question which may need a bit of detail in the text and perhaps some fresh sources. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cuisine of Jerusalem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Quarter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cuisine of Jerusalem

The article Cuisine of Jerusalem you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cuisine of Jerusalem for comments about the article, and Talk:Cuisine of Jerusalem/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Haim Nisim Abulafia

Hello, PeleYoetz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haim Nisim Abulafia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Icewhiz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Barkeep49 (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration motions regarding Palestine-Israel articles

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Motion 1: Appeals only to ArbCom

When imposing a contentious topic restriction under the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic, an uninvolved administrator may require that appeals be heard only by the Arbitration Committee. In such cases, the committee will hear appeals at ARCA according to the community review standard. A rough consensus of arbitrators will be required to overturn or amend the sanction.

Motion 2b: Word limits

Uninvolved administrators may impose word limits on all participants in a discussion, or on individual editors across all discussions, within the area of conflict. These word limits are designated as part of the standard set of restrictions within the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic. These restrictions must be logged and may be appealed in the same way as all contentious topic restrictions.

Motion 2c: Word limits

All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. This motion will sunset two years from the date of its passage.

Motion 5: PIA5 Case

Following a request at WP:ARCA, the Arbitration Committee directs its clerks to open a case to examine the interaction of specific editors in the WP:PIA topic area. Subject to amendment by the drafting arbitrators, the following rules will govern the case:

The case title will be Palestine-Israel articles 5.
The initial parties will be:
- BilledMammal (talk · contribs)
- Iskandar323 (talk · contribs)
- Levivich (talk · contribs)
- Nableezy (talk · contribs)
- PeleYoetz (talk · contribs)
- Selfstudier (talk · contribs)
- האופה (talk · contribs)
Aoidh will be the initial drafter
The case will progress at the usual time table, unless additional parties are added or the complexity of the case warrants additional time for drafting a proposed decision, in which case the drafters may choose to extend the timeline.
All case pages are to be semi-protected.
Private evidence will be accepted. Any case submissions involving non-public information, including off-site accounts, should be directed to the Arbitration Committee by email to Arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Any links to the English Wikipedia submitted as part of private evidence will be aggregated and posted on the evidence page. Any private evidence that is used to support a proposal (a finding of fact or remedy) or is otherwise deemed relevant to the case will be provided to affected parties when possible (evidence of off-wiki harassment may not be shared). Affected parties will be given an opportunity to respond.

Addendum

In passing motion #5 to open a Palestine-Israel articles 5 case, the Committee has appointed three drafters: Aoidh, HJ Mitchell, and CaptainEek. The drafters have resolved that the case will open on November 30. The delay will allow the Committee time to resolve a related private matter, and allow for both outgoing and incoming Arbitrators to vote on the case. The drafters have changed the party list to the following individuals:

The drafters reserve the right to amend the list of parties if necessary. The drafters anticipate that the case will include a two week evidence phase, a one week workshop phase, and a two week proposed decision phase.

The related Arbitration enforcement referral: Nableezy et al request has been folded into this case. Evidence from the related private matter, as alluded to in the Covert canvassing and proxying in the Israel-Arab conflict topic area case request, will be examined prior to the start of the case, and resolved separately.

For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 05:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motions regarding Palestine-Israel articles