Talk:Cuisine of Jerusalem/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: PeleYoetz (talk · contribs) 11:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 13:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Small details
[edit]Extended content
|
---|
|
Comments
[edit]Overall this is a clear, reliably-sourced account of the subject.
- This is more a question than anything, but it does feel like a gap in the otherwise excellent coverage. Three paragraphs of 'History', and the lead, claim there are significant influences from various places and groups of people, without really spelling out what the influences were. What would be local Arab influences, for instance? What is distinctive about Sephardic food? Are there any dishes, sauces, or techniques identifiably from the Maghreb, Iran, Bukhara, Yemen, Kurdistan? If so, what are they? It would be nice to have specific examples, and ideally dates. Conversely, are there any dishes (etc) that developed locally in Jerusalem, or have been there for millennia? I wonder if a map might help, with dates and examples? See for example Curry for how that might be done and why it might help. Happy to discuss this, and indeed to help with graphics if that would be useful.
Images
[edit]- All the images are on Commons and are plausibly licensed.
- Article has 9 images in the text, followed by a "Gallery" section with 11 more images. This is perhaps rather a large number, but more troubling is the unsorted nature of "Gallery": the obvious question is "what's it for?", given that the text is already illustrated. Better would be to include small galleries in "Main dishes" and in "Desserts" and to get rid of "Gallery"; indeed, you could have one with the street images in "History" – very likely, many of the existing Gallery images could be reused in those places.
- @Chiswick Chap: I believe that’s complete. Any feedback would be appreciated. PeleYoetz (talk) 19:21, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I see you've decided against galleries per individual section. Personally I'd prefer that but it's probably not a pass/fail matter, however advisable it may be. I do think that having the images running down into the References is untidy but I'll leave that for you to sort out "in slow time" later. I hope you have found the review useful; I'm happy to pass this as a GA now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Extended content
|
---|
|
Summary
[edit]This is a fine article and I hope to see it at GA soon. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.