User talk:IOHANNVSVERVS

Archives

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. If you have questions, please contact me. --Orgullomoore (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1988 Hamas Charter Talk Page Archive / Removal

The rules regarding restricted pages state: "Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive." My edit was clearly in compliance. My edit request of the article was clearly vindicated. My edit was, undisputably and objectively, a positive contribution. There is no reason for the drama. For reference: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_removal Please do not arbitrarily remove/hide/disparage content without discussion, consensus, or explanation that is carefully determined to be valid. You were given an opportunity to discuss the matter prior to your decision to hide the content, you knew that hiding the content was controversial, and you chose not to discuss the matter and hid it. The hiding of the content was entirely arbitrary. Again, the edit request was in fact clearly vindicated. My contribution to the talk page was in absolute, not-reasonably-disputable compliance with the rules, was made in good faith, and was objectively valuable contribution. Isonomia01 (talk) 17:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted myself. I think you're right and your edit request was reasonable. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine-Israel articles 5 arbitration case opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Evidence. Please add your evidence by 23:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC), which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 05:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]