User:Toon05/Dash
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 71.183.124.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 47.210.12.183 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 231 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters containing no spaces, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 207.236.13.155 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 124.169.141.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 766 twice in the last 5 minutes (Alt-right labeling, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 63.245.187.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 380 five times in the last 5 minutes (Multiple obscenities, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 201.146.7.101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Behavior suggests the IP is occupied by bored students in Mexico. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- GGEMM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Bubble gum: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Corus Entertainment Inc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Wikishovel (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ecobask (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (ecobask.in). —Bruce1eetalk 17:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kedikhot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Promoting website of the same name. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 17:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Political article that appears to have had biased information on it. Moreover, the article appears ripe for an edit war and paid writers on it could be possible. Holyapple25 (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again by IPs and new user. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Highly obscene and unnecessary messages by IP - https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thewikizoomer&oldid=1246488973. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continued re-insertion by IPs of an image which is most likely a copyright infringement. TarnishedPathtalk 09:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Koopinator (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: False information has been added to the page multiple times, including reference to a nonexistent 'Corporate Communication Manager' named Aidan Ashford and to a nonexistent sub-brand called 'Trade Republica'.
It looks like these changes are being made in order to lend credence to phishing campaigns targeting Trade Republic customers. The supposed 'Trade Republica' branding in particular is similar to phishing domains targeting customers that we have previously identified. We have already reverted these changes several times, but they are quickly added again by the same user, 'Roger Jason Bennett', who has also added a reference to an 'Aidan Ashford' to the page for the European Securities and Markets Authority. Endmost wiki (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 14:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism related to https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/indonesia-fufufafa-social-media-gibran-rakabuming-raka-prabowo-subianto-4615471 . Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed dynamic IP same disruption. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is not appropriate for issues with single IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I requested this page protection request August 30th 19:59 US Eastern on the subject's talk page and was told that they do not protect pages unless there is a high level of vandalism or disruptive activity. I've been carefully following this page's edits for the past twenty days and there has been a high level of disruptive editing. I strongly advise Wikipedia moderators and admins to discuss protecting this page. Butterscotch5 (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think you mean September 11 attacks, because the redirect you listed has only been edited 3 times. Babysharkboss2!! (No Life 'Til Leather) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: high level of vandalism Cynthiakaui (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address continues to make changes describing Meyer as a convicted felon who is on the run. The news articles in question do describe issuing a warrant, but there is no phrasing describing her as convicted felon. This article has had issues over the years (see the talk page), and I expect this behavior will continue moving forward. DaffodilOcean (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: I hope it can be pointed out on the discussion page that the explosive devices were not limited to Gold Apollo; devices from the well-known Japanese company Icom Incorporated also exploded. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: "acts to promote awareness of Israel and the Middle East in the United Kingdom." is wholly misleading and accepts the purported purpose of the journal without quotes to indicate potential bias. The article has essentially no critique of what is a distinctly right-wing journal (IE: there is a major bias in the journal, regardless of left or right affiliation) except for an even more right-wing criticism. Given the clear bias and the unfinished nature of the page, it should really be opened up LordGigapiller (talk) 02:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- If there is a reliable source for such a critique, please post it here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The talk page is not protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined This may have been misfiled. Filmssssssssssss, if you're in fact requesting an increase in protection, please go to WP:RFPPI, but at a glance there is not enough recent vandalism to support an increase. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change the "mainly Hezbollah members" note on the casualties to "mainly civilians" as a large swath of Hezbollah casualties were apart of their political wing and considered civilians under international law, as well as ensuring the hundreds of medical staff who use pagers and were injured are not ignored. By simply stating that the majority of casualties were apart of Hezbollah, is suggests that the majority of casualties were non-civilian, which is inherently incorrect as stated above. It is imperative that this fact be clarified to prevent misinformation and further demonization of Lebanon.
Furthermore, it must be stated clearly and constantly that not only were the vast majority of the victims civilians, but that such an attack is, by definition and intent, a terror attack on Lebanon by israel (as israel has now confirmed they were behind it and had been planning it for an unspecified length of time). The severity of the attack in the context of international law must also be stated clearly as this is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention and general international law that protects civilians from attack and prohibits the use of terrorism a a legitimate manner of warfare.
For evidence to the above claims, see https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/9/18/israels-war-on-gaza-live-thousands-injured-in-lebanon-pager-explosions in which multiple quotes from israel, Hezbollah, the Lebanese Health Ministry, the UN, and various other third-parties with weight on the issue can be found and used to validate the above claims. Against the Empire (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Mainly Hezbollah members" should be changed to "mainly civilians"
- I am not aware of a single reliable source that has confirmed that most of the casualties were civilian. This is also something that I doubt will come to light very quickly, since Hezbollah generally does not like publishing lists of their soldiers, so discerning who is and isn't a soldier is extremely difficult. Hezbollah themselves claiming that "most casualties were civilian" is not evidence, as Hezbollah is not a reliable source on this matter, since they are known to regularly lie for propaganda purposes.
- And suppose that we did have a reliable source claim that most casualties were civilian. This would still not change the fact that most reliable source primarily describe the casualties as "mainly Hezbollah members" and only talk about civilians second. The article must reflect the style of reliable formats, so it cannot assign more importance to their civilian status than their Hezbollah membership unless reliable sources also do so.
- Medical staff should not be ignored
- They are not ignored. Such information is mentioned under the "Casualties" section. Admittedly, this section could be expanded, and it probably will be with time.
- Calling casualties mainly Hezbollah members suggests they are not civilians
- No it doesn't. The interested reader is free to visit the Hezbollah article and read about their organization. It is not Wikipedia's job to correct every single possible misunderstanding that a reader might have at every possible moment.
- This demonizes Lebanon
- No it doesn't. There is no reason that the article's failure to clarify the exact makeup of the casualties should lead readers to conclude that Hezbollah is evil. And even if it does, this won't lead to the demonization of Lebanon, but that of Hezbollah.
- And besides, it's not Wikipedia's job to prevent demonization. And even if it were, the change you suggest would lead to much more demonization of Israel than it would prevent demonization of Hezbollah, so the net change would be more demonization in the world.
- It must be stated clearly and constantly...
- No it shouldn't. That would be annoying to read.
- Israel has now confirmed they were behind it
- Where did you read this? It's news to me. You should really cite a source here, it would make a great addition to the article.
- Dieknon (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
(I did not put the talk page by mistake in the page title field, that was intentional)
Add topic about the sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" in the third paragraph of the article, with the next paragraph as the body of the topic:
The sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" appears to contradict other pieces of information in the article, specifically that two children died from the explosions. Hezbollah doesn't seem to have a history of using child soldiers in any capacity. The reported ages of the children who died seem to be around the range of 8-11, so I think it's safe to assume that the children who died were not members of Hezbollah. The size of the explosions wouldn't of been enough to kill someone without being in close proximity to it (its not like the pagers had a blast radius of several hundred meters), which implies that the children were either holding the pager or in close proximity to the pagers. Therefore, it can be assumed that non-Hezbollah members were carrying pagers. Granted, I doubt these children were carrying around a pager wherever they went, but they must've been relatively close to it in order to be killed by the pager (as in, holding or carrying the pager).
The reason why I'm saying to add a topic to the talk page instead of just "remove this sentence from the article" is because it's debatable if it actually does contradict, and I'd prefer to get some consensus about it beforehand. I can't request an edit of the article on the talk page due to it being protected, so I can't just use the edit request to gauge consensus on this issue. This could also very well be considered WP:OR, I'm of the opinion that "the explosive that requires one to be close to it to hurt them implies that people who were hurt by it were close to it" would fall under WP:CALC, but I could see consensus going either way on this. AlexChillOut (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Here is a source used two sentences later in the same article for the claim about the children who died: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd7xnelvpepo
- Also, here is a source to show the range of the explosives, it can be seen in the video that they have a rather short range: https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/lebanon-pagers-attack-hezbollah/index.html
- That video is already uploaded to Wikipedia, and can be found here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:CCTV_video_of_pager_explosion_in_a_Beirut_market.webm
- The rest is mainly these two pieces of information put together, a pager killing a child implies the child was close enough to it to be injured; based on the range shown in the video, they were likely holding it. The source that is cited for the sentence I believe should be removed adds that it was not *immediately* clear, not that it's unclear now (https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/dozens-wounded-after-pagers-detonate-lebanon-officials-point-113754464) AlexChillOut (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 19 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for accountcreator |
|---|
Account creator[edit]
Returning from a wiki-break, former ACC. Happy to help with the backlog. TiggerJay (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I would like to introduce an exceptional editor and author with a amazing track record in editing and article creation. Created 182 articles, none of which have been deleted, with the majority focusing on BLPs. Nice editor, and it’s clear that he is one of the editors for whom this user right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Of course, I am ashamed that I have not yet made 400, 300 or even 150 articles and most likely will never make that many. But I can say in my «defense» that more than half of them are rare goods, they are world premieres. Before that, there were no such articles in Wikipedias. And I had to create Wikidata for many of them, categories on Commons and start from scratch. It is important for me to make articles in the English Wikipedia, because this immediately promotes a new topic to the whole world. --- - Names·nik·tlk 16:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
A good editor with a solid history of article creation, having created 135 articles, with only one being PROD’d in 2014 and another AfD’d in 2018. The other three deletions, which were G6 and G8, are not particularly significant. Since 2018, none of their articles have been deleted. Their article creation primarily focuses on BLPs, demonstrating their knowledge of notability guidelines. I don’t believe they would abuse the right, and granting it would help reduce the backlog. GrabUp - Talk 05:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access for updating census data of highly populated Indian villages in Kerala state and other human settlements on this planet in future. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like access to AWB to fix CheckWiki issues more efficiently than I currently do using WPCleaner. I also want to streamline typo fixing as part of WP:TYPO. I understand I have been denied it twice in the recent past, but I strongly believe that I am fit for getting the permission now, as I gained significantly more experience and done more constructive edits. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like to use AWB's Checkwiki functionality to alter position of references with respect to punctuation and incorrect ISBNs as I am frequently revising pages that need reference issue support; use find and replace for music album title issues; and use AWB for assistance on creating and correcting items and links within categories of music genres, domestic flag information, and public parks. Thank you. Shotgunheist 💬 19:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Improve articles' layouts, correcting Spanish settlement infoboxes, changing IPA-va (depricated) to IPA|ca-valencia, adding IPA, correcting links, etc. I had AWB rights in the past, however I stopped using Wikipedia due to COVID-19. Now I am fully recovered and would like to carry on improving things here and there. Thank you. Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Requesting access to clean up a relatively long list of redirects that were left after a page move. RachelTensions (talk) 13:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Can i please have extended confirmed rights back. I lost it because one day when i had a little less than 500 edits, i made about 45-55 edits in one hour in order to get to 500 edits. Im new to this site and didn't know gaming edits was against the rules. Ever since i lost the extended confirmed thing, I've made hundreds of edits i think are constructive and i stopped vandalism a few times and have a much better understanding of the rules. extended confirmed rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I want to be able to branch out and explore different aspects of Wikipedia, as article creation does tend to get boring nowadays. I have made 340 pages, 4 of which were deleted (all 4 were from June or earlier). I have no track record of incivility that I am aware of besides a heated conflict back in April, and am a host at the Teahouse. I have commented or voted on ~45 AfDs, and have sent several of my articles through AfC, and I know how the policies work there. If possible, I'd also like to request just a 1-month trial, as I want to see what the tool is like before I commit to it. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am interested in helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and i think now I'm experienced in AFD, AFC and draftifications. Xegma(talk) 20:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have some experience in AfC and NPP that I believe would help me. {{The Sharpest Lives|💬|✏️|ℹ️}} 04:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I currently have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days and would like to continue patrolling new pages to help bring down the huge backlog. Ednabrenze (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing general maintenance tasks for a while now (despite some breaks in activity), and I would like the opportunity to further expand my skill set and help reduce the backlog of pages. Thanks! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I have some experience creating article and so far, I have been guiding new users to edit Wikipedia as well as reviewing their drafts. I will like to request the new page reviewer following my understanding of how it works (This took a while for me, however I am very good now following several trainings). Looking forward to my request been granted!. Tesleemah (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
I was hoping to participate in the NPP Sep. backlog drive, since I missed the last one. I have some article writing experience, and regularly interact with newcomers during RC patrolling. I also have a decent AfD nomination ratio, with the same being true of my CSD log. Overall, I think I would make a useful addition to the NPP team, and hope to be trusted with this responsibility. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Besides a few articles and redirects that I sometimes create, I often help others with improving and reviewing their drafts and newly created articles. If I could then mark the articles as reviewed and use the other review tools, this work would be even more effective. Thanks. Killarnee (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am adding request to become a New Page Reviewer on Wikipedia. I have been an active contributor to the platform for More than 3 years and have made significant contributions to various articles and other projects. I believe in my experience and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines make me an ideal candidate for the New Page Reviewer role. please review my contributions and let me know if I meet the eligibility criteria for the New Page Reviewer role? I would appreciate your feedback on this matter. Thank you! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request for NPP rights to help reduce the huge backlog of NPP reviewers. I have familiarized myself with the prerequisite required for this permission. I started to help out in draftspace of my interest, and noticed that there are quite of huge backlog that are pending review, in which only NPP reviewers are allowed to accept/reject it, I believed with my knowledge, I can volunteer to reduce it. Thank you for considering me. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 07:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting for Page Mover rights on Wikipedia. I have been an active contributor and have made significant contributions. I believe in my experience and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello there, I'm requesting for permissions because I know it will save a lot of time my time to undo problematic edits. I have read the guidelines for how and when to use rollback so yes am ready. Cheers
Hello! I have been guiding new users against Vandalism for a while now and this is done mostly offline.however,recently my passion for more onwiki contribution grew and I signed up as a host on Wikipedia Teahouse where I have been guiding new editors, I will like to request the right to roll back edit in order to do more of onwiki tasks and ease the work of admins. Tesleemah (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have rollback because vandalism on wikipedia is always high and it is important to have people looking out for potential vandals, and lower this. I will not give mercy unless it is a good faith edit and will make sure to always warn users, as I am doing right now with the help of Ultraviolet. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have over 800 edits, most of which are on the main space. I am aware I have a somewhat lousy history with giving proper edit summaries, as i didn't fill out revision summaries, but I have tried to rectify it. I was also involved in a dispute which might have been classified as an edit war back in April. Other then that I have a clean slate. Thanks for considering. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
|