User:Excirial/Dashboard
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
|
Reports[edit]
User-reported[edit]
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 110 items Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Usernames for administrator attention
User-reported[edit]
Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Due to high traffic, requesting page to protected a bit longer to protect from disruptive IP edits. Imcdc Contact 07:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost nonstop vandalism, pending changes does not seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mellk (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs appearing to change nationality. Mellk (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naniwoofg. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naniwoofg. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several IP users have been re-adding an unsourced, and possibly fabricated, political-party infobox to this article about a NYC neighborhood. Epicgenius (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP 158.140.182.96 keeps vandalizing the page over many days DACartman (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing and repeated IP vandalism and removal of cited content. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Reason: Persistant sockpuppetry, User:Unklabwebmaster is now going by the name User:LPM UNKLAB. Catfurball (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please consider a longer protection period. Aqurs1 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent unsourced number changes & other disruption by IPs. it's hard to verify the numbers because the Russian census is pretty inaccessible and difficult to navigate, but i think it's correct right now. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Some vandalism is going on in the article a bit here and there. I think it would be best to semi-protect the article for a week. This can just be a little cool-off period. 64.189.243.210 (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's been people adding fictional references to the infobox in this article. Kurnahusa (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Support - fans of the video game My Summer Car have been adding false information about this car being built in Peräjärvi, Finland for several months. It was protected for two days back in October, which is entirely pointless when there are hundreds of bored gamers who keep returning. Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC) Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – PIA enforcement. Jfire (talk) 23:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The IP 187.36.171.230 and 2804:388:412a:5a4e:1:0:5b7d:dbd0 (probably the same person that originally created this very problematic article) has been edit warring over my attempt (which I'm not entirely satisfied with myself) to improve the article. The source of problem is the conflicting national(ist) Serbian and Bosnian claims over the manuscript, which isn't really helped by bogus claims that the sources are unreliable (while providing no sources at all) and accusing people of "Anti-Serb washing bias". (Also I intended to report the editor for edit warring but can't figure out how to do it.) Phazd (talk|contribs) 23:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP addresses adding unsourced material about a trade to the New York Rangers, which has yet to be confirmed by the teams involved or the NHL. ShallowC (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Protecting page from vandalism; several IP addresses have edited her biography to include sentences that she is of Chinese, Japanese, or Arakanese descent, which is not true and unmentioned on their respective citations. Call me PI. (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC) Reason: Persistent edit warring and addition of unsourced and WP:OR content by IPs and newly-created accounts. Borgenland (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: To satisfy the outcome of this merge discussion; both template redirects that point here are currently ECP. ToThAc (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC) Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here. Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Add that 80 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the “ceasefire” began (i.e. genocide direct deaths have continued albeit at a slower pace) https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/death-and-destruction-returning-to-rafah https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/29/israeli-forces-have-killed-more-than-80-palestinians-in-gaza-since-ceasefire-went-into-effect/ Seahumidity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Add info about 35 year reduction in life expectancy according to UPenn study http://www.thedp.com/article/2025/01/penn-study-gaza-life-expectancy-drop Seahumidity (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Create an article about the song "Loco" by Netón Vega. MC-123 (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive. Protected edit requests
Requests for permission - rollback
WP:RFPERM (rollback)Rollback[edit]
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights I mainly spend my time on Wikipedia correcting non-constructive edits and vandalism, as well as notifying users. The majority of my edits are minor changes or changes to users' talk pages. I'm requesting rollback rights so that I can better use some of the anti-vandalism tools available to me. Thanks for your time. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights because I spend most of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, and I would like to help fight vandals more effectively. I have made some mistakes, but I mostly have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies, and I try to always WP:AGF. Rollback will also allow me to use tools like AntiVandal. Thank you. Protobowladdict (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Some newbie editors contain IP address not their username editing wrong and fake information even if is not the area origin. Vineyard93 (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have been working on counter-vandalism with RedWarn for a while now. Despite my inconsistent and relatively low edit count compared to other requesters, I believe I would be a good fit. I approach CV with the idea that it is better to have somebody with malicious intentions get away with their behavior than it is to accuse an innocent person of Vandalism. I aim for high accuracy over total reverts. I have made mistakes in the past but I am usually quick to notice and fix them. The main reason I am requesting Rollback is to gain experience with the Huggle desktop application. Thank you for the consideration and I look forward to hearing back. UndeadAnarchy|✉ 14:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback permission to help combat vandalism, particularly in Nepal-related articles, which I frequently come across while patrolling recent changes. Having rollback rights would allow me to efficiently revert obvious and disruptive edits, improving the quality of affected pages. I always assume good faith and am careful when reviewing edits. If I am uncertain whether an edit is vandalism, I do not revert it. I am also familiar with Wikipedia’s warning templates and know when it is appropriate to report persistent vandals to WP:AIV. I believe rollback will be a valuable tool in my efforts to maintain Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will use it responsibly. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Requests for permission - account creator There are no outstanding requests for account creator.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
