MediaWiki talk:Bad image list/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions about MediaWiki:Bad image list. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Protected edit request on 8 December 2019
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add File:Cho Seung-hui 3.jpg; being used in vandalism [1] 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 21:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Done. And if I may, seeing as there are some requests on this page w/o the {{edit fully-protected}} template I'll use this query to remind people that they need to use it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Jimbo's user page
See this discussion at User talk:Jimbo Wales. There are several images of the Pricasso portait here that should be added to the Bad image list to prevent their misuse by a particularly tiresome troll.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Cecil the lion at Hwange National Park (4516560206).jpg
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On Jack Cork, occasionally, but not every day, a troll or trolls are frequently changing the player's image to the famous lion which made the news in 2015. That has happened numerous times now and should be on the list to prevent further disruption to the famous person's article. Iggy (Swan) (What I've been doing to maintain Wikipedia) 17:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Probably better to semiprotect the article rather than adding it here. If it starts happening again, please request at WP:RFPP — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 03:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
@Acroterion: can be removed, deleted. Home Lander (talk) 18:09, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add; being used by apparently same LTA as File:JAM Liner Inc. 1520.jpg. See [2] for example. Home Lander (talk) 03:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done Izno (talk) 14:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Necrotizing fasciitis left leg.JPEG
Please add File:Necrotizing fasciitis left leg.JPEG. Although the usage of this picture is normal at the moment, labeling it as a bad image prevents improper usage. In my humble opinion, it should be added into the Bad image list. --筆和擦膠必有用 (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- 筆和擦膠必有用, already on the list. View the local file description (instead of Commons) and you'll see the template that it has been blacklisted. Home Lander (talk) 00:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Deleted from Commons, can be removed from the list. Home Lander (talk) 02:49, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Sexuality pearl necklace small.png
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm not gonna admit how long it took me to realise that this feature and not a markup error was at fault... But this instance appears mostly to be a technical issue--the page this image is allowed for was recently moved (seemingly correctly, so this isn't an issue), but the disparity between the current title Pearl necklace (sexual act) and the listed exception at Pearl necklace (sexuality) are causing the image to break. Gʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ˣ 02:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
As in the title. Thank you. — kashmīrī TALK 11:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done The use of non-free media must satisfy all of the non-free content criteria. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Background
The file usage is currently normal. But as of now, improper usage and vandalism includes promotion of Communism and insults to other users by using the image, which possibly could happen.
So, I hereby propose a new addition to this list. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 08:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit protected}}
template. That file is so widely used that we'd either need a consensus to reduce its use or we'd need a humongously long list of exemptions. I think more discussion is necessary here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Has been used for vandalism on many talk pages (by this user). TheImaCow (talk) 10:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Four images used for vandalism for multiple articles (add these please)
Add these:
- File:Ajit V. Pai headshot.jpg (used for vandalism on the garbage article, see the bottom of the edit)
And that's it. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 20:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. This page is generally used to blacklist explicit images which have no or limited encyclopaedic use. The last I would list if it had been used extensively for vandalism but it could arguably have an encyclopaedic value. The rest I wouldn't list without a consensus at somewhere like the admins' noticeboard. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Somehow abused by a certain LTA whose name I won't mention by embedding this on various users' talk pages in what I can construe as a bizarre form of trolling. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Also used by a certain LTA to aid in his puerile trolling spree, exhibit A being the recent vandalism done on Coronavirus disease 2019. Given bin Laden's notoriety this isn't surprising. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Anyone? Blake Gripling (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blakegripling ph, yeah, I'd support this. My Royal Young is the LTA responsible, and this is an ongoing crosswiki issue wherein the sockpuppets of MRY spam this image on the talk pages of multiple users who fight MRY. JavaHurricane 07:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done Lengthy list of exceptions, hopefully all are OK. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
yeah .. add this. Used for vandalism. Note: dont forget the other images of this user --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 00:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Added. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Can this image be abused for vandalism?
Also images used in the barnstar that aren't listed:
- File:Geil2.JPG
- File:Erect_penis_of_33-year-old_male.jpg
- File:Anterior_view_of_human_male,_retouched.jpg
Anomper012 (talk) 03:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Cleanup
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove
and add
which are renamings of the respective files.
Remove
which has been deleted from Commons.
Also remove
which are redirects to other files that are already on the list.
Home Lander (talk) 20:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Portraits of the 9/11 hijackers have been abused recently, not just bin Laden. Please see [3] and [4] for examples. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 16:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
why dont delete the file?
if its a bad image its should be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.161.157.43 (talk) 08:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Bad images are required for most articles, since photos explain it better than words Anomper012 (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- And we have no control over what happens at
PornhubCommons. Black Kite (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)- Thankyou for that slander Black Kite.
- OP, to answer your question, just because something is potentially a "bad" image doesn't mean it isn't educational, or useful in other contexts. A photo of a kitten would be useful on an article about cats, but not useful on an article about Bosnian war crimes. The reverse is true - an image of Bosnian war crimes would be relevant to an article about Bosnian war crimes, but would be distressing on a page about kittens. We shouldn't delete the war crimes image just because it's being used to vandalise, but we can instead restrict its use to that one article.
- Another aspect to consider is that Wikimedia Commons, where most images are held, does not exist merely to serve English Wikipedia. It repository of free educational media for all Wikimedia projects and other wider uses. That will at times include things which some users may find distressing or objectionable, but we aim not to censor ourselves. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- And we have no control over what happens at
Suggested addition
Recent use in vandalism e.g. here and on User talk:Glen. No current use in articles on enwiki. Facial (sexual act) is currently using the png version and could be a possible exception. Wham2001 (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Added Thanks for the report. Woody (talk) 22:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
3 suggested penis additions
Please add File:My penis in a cock ring and electric stimulation.JPG, File:My Penis❤️.jpg, and File:My penis 1.jpg to the bad image list JohnSmith13345 (talk) 03:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Also “File:My dick in 2007 - Flickr - stnu.jpg” JohnSmith13345 (talk) 03:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Added Woody (talk) 18:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Woody, one image you added, File:Male exposing his anus.gif, has been deleted from Commons so it can be removed. Home Lander (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Removed Woody (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Woody, one image you added, File:Male exposing his anus.gif, has been deleted from Commons so it can be removed. Home Lander (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
JAM Transit Inc. 716.jpg
Also used by an LTA as part of his rather bizarre modus operandi. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Suggested removal
This appears to be just a picture of a bus on a street (in the Philippines). I don't see any nudity, sex, disturbing content, or anything else which might ordinarily cause an image to be put on the Bad image list anywhere in the image. Perhaps I am missing something? If there is something offensive, it should probably be mentioned on the description page at File:4825Maduya,_Carmona,_Cavite_Landmarks_02.jpg so that editors will understand the problem. But if there is nothing problematic here, the image should probably be removed from the Bad image list. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Metropolitan90: IIRC, there's one LTA, whose name I can't remember right now, who likes to spam this image on user talk pages. I have no idea why. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. In the meantime since my original post, while looking at MediaWiki talk:Bad image list/Archive 9#File:4825Maduya,_Carmona,_Cavite_Landmarks_02.jpg, I saw that someone was using this image for vandalism purposes, but I take it that the image itself is not problematic. I would suggest that, at a minimum, this image be marked as "except on JAM Liner" with a note about the long-term abuse, similar to what is done for File:JAM Liner Inc. 1520.jpg and File:JAM Transit Inc. 1556.jpg. But I would prefer to punish the vandal and leave these innocuous photos off the Bad image list. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- No objections from me to marking LTA images as such, so long as the LTA isn't named. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:15, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- But the other two JAM Liner bus photos are the only photos on the Bad image list that are indicated as being banned because of a user spamming them. Why should we ban these photos when the photos themselves are not problematic -- only the LTA who uses them for spam? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well the thing is that the troll using it is spamming these images ad nauseam for some bizarre or inexplicable reason, perhaps to incite drama or reaction from those who he likes to "play" with. Giving him less of a means to use Wikipedia as his sick playground should be in order. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. In the meantime since my original post, while looking at MediaWiki talk:Bad image list/Archive 9#File:4825Maduya,_Carmona,_Cavite_Landmarks_02.jpg, I saw that someone was using this image for vandalism purposes, but I take it that the image itself is not problematic. I would suggest that, at a minimum, this image be marked as "except on JAM Liner" with a note about the long-term abuse, similar to what is done for File:JAM Liner Inc. 1520.jpg and File:JAM Transit Inc. 1556.jpg. But I would prefer to punish the vandal and leave these innocuous photos off the Bad image list. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Requesting an exception for this image to be used for the page Lynching of George Meadows, a page I recently created which this is an image of. JJonahJackalope (talk) 22:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
File:SOA-Condylomata-acuminata-around-anus.jpg - please allow on Human anus
This image is already included in the article Human anus in the appropriate section, but it doesn’t show up because it is disallowed. Elmssuper (talk) 02:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Flag of Hezbollah
hello, could i please use 'Flag_of_Hezbollah.svg' for the 'List of flags by color combination'
--wvdp (talk) 07:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Wvdp I am not an admin, but I'd say no. The reason why we have images added to the bad image list is because they are frequently used for vandalism. You will need to give a good reason why the image should be used. Also, we do not have other contentious symbols on that page, including the Nazi flag or the ISIL flag, and per the principle of least astonishment we should not include objectionable material unless if we can treat it in an encyclopedic manner. Aasim (talk) 07:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think we can use the image in an encyclopedic way. This page is made so that people can look up flags by color. So, if somebody uses this page to look up a yellow flag with green text they probably already see the flag and it would be nice to redirect them to a nuanced page about Hezbollah. Also there is already an entry for Hezbollah in the list just without the flag.
- And without resorting to Whataboutisms the flag of the German Reich aka Nazi flag is already present as the flag for 'Germany (1935–1945)' and the ISIL flag is displayed under " Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (with white text and seal)" together with the flag of "Al-Qaeda".
- So, for my closing remark, bad things exist in the world, and I think it is the job of Wikipedia to describe them in a nutural way. This includes adding some flags to List_of_flags_by_color_combination
- -- wvdp (talk) 09:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Wvdp if you say so, then I'd suggest that you use the {{edit protected}} template to get the attention of an admin. State that you want "List_of_flags_by_color_combination" to be whitelisted for the image that you suggested. I highly doubt that it will be accepted though. Aasim (talk) 00:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Ejaculation.ogv
Allow for educational purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:7993:9300:9C05:DC2:6C59:990 (talk) 00:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Add File:Cut_Rat.jpg
- File:Cut_Rat.jpg
- Laboratory_rat
- Dissection
- User:Suriel1981/Cult_of_Jimbo/Sacrifices — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.92.196.197 (talk) 11:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Add File:Male's scrotum.jpg
Allow File:Male's scrotum.jpg to Erection, propose is to visualize an erection from a different angle and visualize an uncircumcised penis to a circumcised. Vallee01 (talk) 09:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Why is File:4825Maduya, Carmona, Cavite Landmarks 02.jpg listed?
The image appears to be an inoffensive photograph of a bus, which has been released into the public domain by its photographer. Am I missing something? Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Please see MediaWiki_talk:Bad_image_list/Archive_9#Suggested_removal, and some other places in the archive(s). A weird vandal who is still currently active likes to spam these buses in a vandalistic manner. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Deleted from Commons, can be removed. Home Lander (talk) 02:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Rename
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change
- File:Pissing in a glass.jpg except on Urolagnia
to
- File:Woman urinating in a glass.jpg except on Urolagnia
as the file has been renamed.
Home Lander (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Question
If these "bad images" aren't being used in articles, is there a reason they are not simply deleted? I assume that they have a place on this list because they've been judged to be offensive, so why are they kept on en-Wiki? Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: most of the files are from commonswiki, this only impacts them being used here on enwiki. — xaosflux Talk 17:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Rename
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please rename
to
to match the Commons file. Home Lander (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done added the current redirect target. — xaosflux Talk 16:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add, used for TFA vandalism by an LTA
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- Done Izno (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Removal
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove:
All are deleted on commons. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 14:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Done thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Request
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add:
These are being used for widespread vandalism by several IPs. --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- I assume you meant they are to be added. Acroterion (talk) 13:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Acroterion, my apologies. Kindly add these to the list of bad images. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- No problem, already done. Acroterion (talk) 14:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Acroterion, my apologies. Kindly add these to the list of bad images. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Sorting the list
I've restored the traditional locale or "English" sorting for the list. It's not really important in the grand scheme of things, but I thought I would take the opportunity to make a note for future reference, and mention a relevant script.
The difference between locale sorting and other sorting can be seen with this example: Given these characters ['b', 'á', 'C']
, locale sorting returns ['á', 'b', 'C']
, whereas character sorting returns ['C', 'b', 'á']
. I personally like to also tweak the punctuation sorting to better suit image extensions, so [[:File:A.jpg]]
is listed before [[:File:A penis.jpg]]
, instead of the default which does the opposite.
Most people probably don't have ready access to this type of sorting, so I mentioned there's a script. It's work in progress and currently really basic, but you're welcome to adopt it: User:Zzuuzz/scripts/badimagelist.js. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nice idea! Very niche but definitely useful. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for this. The traditional sorting is much more intuitive. — Newslinger talk 07:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add:
Currently being used for vandalism by a rampaging vandal account. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Add File:Cut rat 2.jpg
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.92.196.197 (talk • contribs) 11:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not done: Request is unclear. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Add File:Malesub Bootfetish.jpg
except on Dominatrix and Boot worship; fetish image used in vandalism. Thanks! Elli (talk | contribs) 09:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Also, separate to this, consider removing
all are deleted on Commons. Elli (talk | contribs) 09:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Shouldn't these images actually be deleted?
Except for the ones that have exceptions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Alfa-ketosav: most of these images aren't here on the English Wikipedia, but in the shared repository, Commons. To learn about their deletion process please see: commons:Commons:Deletion policy. — xaosflux Talk 10:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I meant, that shouldn't the images that don't have exception pages on any Wikipedia be removed from Commons. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Alfa-ketosav: Commons' policies and goals differ from the English Wikipedia's, as set by their community - you would need to follow up with that project to learn more, a good place to start is here: commons:Commons:Project scope. You may nominated commons files for deletion on commons. An argument that "enwiki put this on the bad image list" is very unlikely to be a good deletion rationale alone for them however. — xaosflux Talk 10:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I meant, that shouldn't the images that don't have exception pages on any Wikipedia be removed from Commons. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Add Wlllio9.jpg
Image was being recently abused on pages such as DMX (rapper). Considering its graphic nature this ought to be restricted. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Exception File:SOA-Condylomata-acuminata-around-anus.jpg on Human anus
This File:SOA-Condylomata-acuminata-around-anus.jpg not showing properly on Human anus. UserTwoSix (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Please add File:Anus when defecating 03.webm, idk why this image is needed in Defecation just see the video right here. -_- 36.79.92.97 (talk) 02:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: The page for Defecation is precisely where you would expect an exception to using this video. But I agree with putting it on the Bad image list. UserTwoSix (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- How about WP:GRATUITOUS, "Offensive material should be used only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available..."? I didn't think this video of shit coming out from anus make this article more informative or encyclopedic. --36.80.204.191 (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Requesting to add
image is being used for vandalism. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Add File:Wiki-sixtynine-male.jpg
except on Fellatio and Gay sexual practices. Sex image that could be used for vandalism. Kjelonos (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
why can't that image be on Wikipedia? I need more information
thumb|Frot. Osman Leonard's (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Osman Leonard's: I've added the exception. You're welcome. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Ok. It's my pleasure. Osman Leonard's (talk) 18:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Exception request for Flag of Hezbollah.svg
I would like to use this image: File:Flag_of_Hezbollah.svg in the "Parties to the civil conflict" list on the 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis page. TheEpicGhosty (talk) 01:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Requesting to add
image is being used for vandalism. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:50, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Done - That seems to be appropriate for the list. Thanks. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:53, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Please remove these three deleted images
Please remove the following three deleted images, as being on the list is no longer necessary to prevent vandalism using them (due to having been deleted):
File:Male Human Anatomy Without Labels.jpg — Deletion summary: G6; deleted on commons
File:Fingering 2.jpg — Deletion summary: G6; deleted on commons
File:Male anus 2.JPG — Deletion summary: G6; deleted on commons
Thanks. —TypicalWikimedian (talk • contribs) 22:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Used for vandalism, see here. firefly ( t · c ) 12:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
except on Fellatio and Oral sex. Used for vandalism on Raiders of the Lost Ark
(JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 23:05, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 5 September 2021
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Pyramids09 (talk) 03:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
File File:J Yaniv.png, File:Personal crop.jpg, and File:JimmyW.png have been deleted.
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kindly add these explicit images...
...as they've been used by an LTA lately:
- File:2015 WNBR Brighton 4.jpg
- File:Beach nudism.jpg
- File:Before trimming.jpg
- File:Circonsis 1.jpg
- File:DSCN2419 (18815608415).jpg
- File:Dad with daughter 2.jpg
- File:Decalotté.jpg
- File:Fesses.jpg
- File:Frisch rasiert.jpg
- File:HPIM1276.JPG
- File:Fimosi.jpg
- File:Low and tight.jpg
- File:319 самое интересное домашнеее порно.ogv
Blake Gripling (talk) 06:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello? Blake Gripling (talk) 07:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Blake Gripling: I wouldn't want you to think you're being ignored. I've tried some other solutions for, I think, most of these. Working? If you include examples it can really help save time. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Suggestion
There was a troll today putting File:"Кримпай" - после эякуляции семени внутри влагалища..jpg on some articles about women. Any way to restrict its use to articles about sexuality? Liz Read! Talk! 17:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: The only way to do this is just blacklist the image if you think that's appropriate - I think some of us here usually prefer to see a pattern of vandalism - and then process any requests for exceptions as normal when they appear on this page (there are currently no uses to add as exceptions), which is to say add exemptions relatively liberally. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Another suggestion File:Creampie dripping.gif was used for vandalism on several editors' pages and I was surprised to see it wasn't on the Bad Images list. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- This might be on the Commons, I'm not sure. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Legitimate use of File:Caucasian man masturbating.jpg
The Masturbation page used this image which I noticed is just a tracing of this image. I thought "why not just use the original image?" so I changed it; however, it did not show. The warning on the file page says "To prevent the use of this file for vandalism, it can only be used on pages for which it is specifically allowed," and "To use this file legitimately, contact an administrator..." so I came here. I think this usage is legitimate. Desperatefisherman (talk) 02:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- There's a reason why the tracing is used - we generally don't use photographs in articles on sexual activity. It's not universal, but it's broadly applied. Acroterion (talk) 02:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Merged Gokkun, want to move image to Semen
I merged a few stub articles to the section of the “semen” article about sexual ingestion, including Gokkun, and would like to use the blacklisted file:///Wiki-gokkun.png in that section to illustrate the topic. Would that be an acceptable use? Dronebogus (talk) 18:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Dronebogus: Done, exception updated. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
File:"EUSSR" flag.svg used mainly for a single troll userbox on English Wikipedia
File:"EUSSR" flag.svg is an inflammatory image that is only used on https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:User_Euroscepticism (created by a disruptive user) and someone’s sandbox page here on English Wikipedia, but has legitimate uses on other Wikipedias. I was wondering if it should be blacklisted to prevent further troll use. Dronebogus (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
New addition needed...
- File:Ma bite avec ses piercing.jpg - Used by this blocked account on their talk page after a block. Nate • (chatter) 05:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Why is File:Paul Stanley looking sober.jpg on the list?
It’s a hilariously unflattering picture, yes, but it’s not in the familiar trifecta of “shit, dicks, gangrene” or otherwise obviously trollish. Dronebogus (talk) 06:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Though "shit, dicks, gangrene" are obvious choices to cause disruption, they are not the only ones. In this case, [5][6] and some others. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weird. Dronebogus (talk) 08:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Legitimate use request for :File:Origin-of-the-World.jpg
- This is an image of a famous oil painting that hangs in the Musee D'Orsay. The right to display it on Facebook has been litigated and won - see L'Origine_du_monde#Censorship_and_legal_battles.
- When I created this account in 2013 I had this eponymous picture on my user page. I also had this user box https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:User_Gustave_Courbet. Very soon after, I was confused with a vandal by a mistaken checkuser, got frustrated, misbehaved, and was blocked. During this process this file was added to the Bad image list and I was refused permission to have it on my page (which was even blanked). I was unblocked over 3 years ago and now request that I be again allowed to use the image on my user page (which has a daily average of zero views). I also request that it be restored to the user box. I do not believe that there has ever been a case of the user box being used by vandals, and the image is very small.♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 18:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Links: ANI block discussion, Previous 'refusal', MfD1, MfD2. @L'Origine du monde: anything else? There have been concerns previously expressed about the size of the image. Do you have any statement about the intended size or placement of the image? Perhaps you're thinking it should be in-your-face-full-size-at-the-top for visitors to your user page? -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for dredging that up user:zzuuzz! Looking through the discussion I see that the customary exemptions for established use, such as the info box or the 4 users who had it on their user page, were omitted in this case. I was planning to replace image:Gustave Courbet - La Source - Musée d'Orsay.jpg, another nude by the same artist, which I have had on my page since July 2019 with no comment or objection. It is currently a 600 pixel thumb image. I just checked, but I can't see what that would look like with this image, as it is blocked! ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 19:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- This is a rather different image to the one you currently have, and it's rather iconic (and used by vandals) for the same reasons. I think it would be a mistake to use this image at the same or any other significant size as the top image on your user page. That's an interim comment and not a refusal - there's obviously some reading to be done first. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much zzuuzz! I don't know what has happened since, but the discussion from 2013 suggested that there had been extremely limited use by vandals, and the image was expressly added because I had it on my user page. While I believe strongly that there should be an unfettered right to display all nude paintings of artistic value in user space, I could limit the size of the image further should that be required, although I do feel that there is a difference between displaying a painting and showing an icon of said work. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 19:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- You're not going to persuade me that this image is not used by vandals, hence removal from the list is not an option. However, I've added several exceptions, including the template and your (current) user page. This is done at your own risk. As I understand it, a template image will not display unless the user page is also exempted, so the template is probably of limited use. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much zzuuzz! I don't know what has happened since, but the discussion from 2013 suggested that there had been extremely limited use by vandals, and the image was expressly added because I had it on my user page. While I believe strongly that there should be an unfettered right to display all nude paintings of artistic value in user space, I could limit the size of the image further should that be required, although I do feel that there is a difference between displaying a painting and showing an icon of said work. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 19:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- This is a rather different image to the one you currently have, and it's rather iconic (and used by vandals) for the same reasons. I think it would be a mistake to use this image at the same or any other significant size as the top image on your user page. That's an interim comment and not a refusal - there's obviously some reading to be done first. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for dredging that up user:zzuuzz! Looking through the discussion I see that the customary exemptions for established use, such as the info box or the 4 users who had it on their user page, were omitted in this case. I was planning to replace image:Gustave Courbet - La Source - Musée d'Orsay.jpg, another nude by the same artist, which I have had on my page since July 2019 with no comment or objection. It is currently a 600 pixel thumb image. I just checked, but I can't see what that would look like with this image, as it is blocked! ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 19:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much zzuuzz. Do you actually know of it being used by vandals?♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 23:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- I do believe I've seen it, yes. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Two files
Could the following be added:
Both used for vandalism, see the history of my talk page and that of Chipmunkdavis. Pahunkat (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Zzuuzz, would you be able to have a look at this? Pahunkat (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
notpageimage
It is now possible to set class=notpageimage
on an image to prevent it being chosen as the page image (displayed in previews, etc). In some (but not all) cases it will be appropriate to add this to images on the bad image list used via an exception. See phab:T301588 for more information. Thryduulf (talk) 15:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Image moved - Please add new filename
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The file File:Gloryhole.jpg was moved to File:Gloryhole with Duct tape.jpg on commons. The original file was on the bad image list. Please add the new filename to the list aswell. Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 13:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Image moved - Please add new filename
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The file File:Penile_vaginal_sexual_act.jpg was moved to File:Penile vaginal sexual act (top down).jpg. The original file was on the bad image list. Please add the new filename to the list aswell. Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 15:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Allow exception of File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg on page 'Afghan rebel flags'
The file File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg should be granted an exception on the page Afghan rebel flags, as currently it just shows up as a link to the file. The Hezbollah flag was used by the Tehran Eight, which as an Iranian backed Shi'a faction in the Soviet-Afghan War. --Peralien (talk) 01:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Peralien: Not done. This is a non-free image and so it needs a valid WP:NFUR for each use, the standard one for a non-free logo (as used for the two articles this image is currently used on) is not suitable for a list article. If you still think it should be displayed inline (rather than having no image and a text link to the Flag of Hezbollah article) first draft a valid NFUR and then request an exception again here with a copy or link to the NFUR. If you need help with writing an NFUR or have questions about any of this then the folks at WP:MCQ are probably the most able to assist. Thryduulf (talk) 03:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Peralien:File:InfoboxHez.PNG is a free version. Can you use it? ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 14:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- @L'Origine du monde: Done, replaced File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg on Afghan rebel flags with File:InfoboxHez.PNG, thanks for the tip. Peralien (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Peralien:File:InfoboxHez.PNG is a free version. Can you use it? ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 14:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Buttplug
Please allow File:Buttplug 1.jpg to be used in Butt plug article. 89.138.218.102 (talk) 12:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Adding File:Autofel.svg
Used for vandalism. See diff. 0xDeadbeef 06:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Done firefly ( t · c ) 10:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Adding File:Mocz.jpg
Used for vandalism. I can see it as the header image on the mobile view of Kharijites but it doesn't seem to appear in desktop. Someone has been vandalising this article recently MelitaJay (talk) 18:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Bad addition.
File:Hands full.jp in the list should be File:Hands full.jpg.Naraht (talk) 13:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I'd like to request an exception to the aforementioned image, File:Osama bin Laden portrait.jpg, so it can be used on FBI Most Wanted Terrorists to fill a gap in the pictures in the Initial persons alleged to be terrorist fugitives section. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 22:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Done @LilianaUwU: -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Boyfriend-2.png except on Friday Night Funkin' and User:Dronebogus/Basement
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
See details at Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested/Archive_20#"Boyfriend" filter. Since this IP hopper seems obsessed with this one image, can we try this first? Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
An vandal posted this image. On the file page, it states that it is on the bad image list but I don't see it listed here. Is this an error or are not all banned images listed to prevent more vandalism? Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Done Re-added. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Boyfriend-2.png exemption in Wikipedia:Sandbox
The Sandbox is for editing tests, this image should be allowed there. 87.97.21.241 (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not done. There are more than a million other images you can use for editing tests. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, if you want to do editing tests with images, use Example.jpg. RteeeeKed💬📖 21:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Please add these files to the list
- File:Hitler portrait crop.jpg
- File:National Socialist swastika (framed in red).svg
- File:Flag of Nazi Germany.svg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 147-0510, Berlin, Lustgarten, Kundgebung der HJ.jpg
- File:Mussolini biografia.jpg
- File:Mussolini and Hitler 1940 (retouched).jpg
- File:Selection on the ramp at Auschwitz-Birkenau, 1944 (Auschwitz Album) 1a.jpg
- File:Песня Хорста Весселя.ogg
- And so on.
These are all Nazi/fascist symbols/people and should only be used on some pages (pretty self-explanatory which ones, e.g any page which currently has the Hitler image on it should be allowed but this image is commonly used in vandalism). 110.150.88.223 (talk) 02:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Do you have evidence for this or are you just trying to preemptively censor potentially useful images? Blacklisting an image is not a frivolous act— it’s a last resort that renders an image largely unusable. Dronebogus (talk) 12:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- As a note, File:Flag of Nazi Germany.svg is currently on over 11,000 pages on Wikipedia including articles on virtually any WWII battle in Europe (mostly in the infobox indicating the leaders/units in the battles) as well as such pages as United States men's national basketball team as the flag that the National Host country had at the time is used as part of the indication for the table row for how the team did in each international competition, including the Olympics. And as for the Horst-Wessel Song, I don't know of any way to cause a song file to autoplay when it is on a page, so using it in vandalism doesn't seem possible (I yield to those with more technical knowledge than I have on this) Naraht (talk) 14:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Listing as Not done because OP has not provided hard evidence for why these specifically need to be blacklisted. The Nazi flag would be an especially ill-advised block since it is used extensively, and there is no evidence anyone would even use audio files for vandalism. Dronebogus (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to use File:Burned_dead_body_in_RABIA_Massacre.jpg as part of the Death by burning article. The image, while gruesome and horrific, is a very valuable image to assist in recognition and forensics. (I don't meant to sound creepy here, and RIP to the victims in the massacure) CactiStaccingCrane 15:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Done without any comment if this is actually appropriate for that article or not, but @CactiStaccingCrane: clearly isn't trying to vandalize it. — xaosflux Talk 16:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Wondering if this image should be blocked from use anywhere except the article for the pictured photograph's author, Nona Faustine. The pictured photograph is a nude portrait of the artist, part of her widely cited series White Shoes, which is discussed in the Nona Faustine article. I know several other famous contemporary artworks that feature identifiable nude figures have been added to this list, wasn't sure what the standard is if there hasn't yet been any vandalism with the photograph. I believe it wouldn't be appropriate to be used anywhere else, but I wanted to be sure that was an OK rationale. Thanks! 19h00s (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t see any good reason to blacklist this image here. If she took the photo she clearly isn’t particularly concerned about people seeing her nude, and there are no cited cases of vandalism, and it’s fair use so it’s not going to show up when you search for “penis” or “nude woman” on Commons. Dronebogus (talk) 08:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I ask because this fair use image is also on this list, but I have been unable to find evidence that it was ever used for vandalism. Benglis obviously also consented to her own nude image being published in Artforum, but it's also on this list. 19h00s (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the Benglis image is a much more obvious vandalism target— it’s a full-frame picture of a traditionally attractive nude woman posing suggestively with a dildo at her crotch. The image you’re recommending blacklisting is a picture featuring its subject standing sternly in a much larger image, with no genitals graphically visible let alone emphasized by props. Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Happy to accept the group's decision, but I would hope that we can get to a place where we're not using "conventional attractiveness" as a part of the decision making process here. Thanks. 19h00s (talk) 12:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Fair point. There was a time the Beglis image was used inappropriately shortly before its listing here.[7] Whether that's enough to justify its continued listing is debatable, though as Dronebogus says, (for whatever reason) it's not an unlikely tool for vandalism. I vaguely seem to recall it being used once upon a time. There's probably no harm done keeping it here, but on balance could probably be removed. As for the Faustine image, you're probably right in saying that it's not going to be appropriate to use elsewhere. This isn't really justification for listing, there's no evidence of misuse, and I personally don't see it as any more likely to be used for vandalism or other misuse than thousands of other unlisted images. Not done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Happy to accept the group's decision, but I would hope that we can get to a place where we're not using "conventional attractiveness" as a part of the decision making process here. Thanks. 19h00s (talk) 12:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the Benglis image is a much more obvious vandalism target— it’s a full-frame picture of a traditionally attractive nude woman posing suggestively with a dildo at her crotch. The image you’re recommending blacklisting is a picture featuring its subject standing sternly in a much larger image, with no genitals graphically visible let alone emphasized by props. Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I ask because this fair use image is also on this list, but I have been unable to find evidence that it was ever used for vandalism. Benglis obviously also consented to her own nude image being published in Artforum, but it's also on this list. 19h00s (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
File:319 самое интересное домашнеее порно.ogv Deleted
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove Dronebogus (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Renamed on commons
I have a list of 40 files which are on this list but have been renamed on commons. To give one example, File:Ed logo.png is listed here, but File:Encyclopedia Dramatica (logo).png is not, even though they both point to the same file. I've been considering whether to add these to the list, and as long as the redirect is listed I think it only makes sense to add the real link. There is the separate question of whether to add other redirects for each blacklisted image, but I'll leave that for another day. Just thought I'd mention it, in case anyone wants to opine before I add 40 apparently new entries. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Added here. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Python script
I'm uploading a python script to help with maintenance of the bad image list. It's at User:Zzuuzz/scripts/bad image check.py. Feel free to try, use, modify, fork, etc. Report any bugs on the talk page, or fix them yourself. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Request to add image
On the talk page of today's featured article, it was pointed out that File:Urethral Play.jpg shows up as the main image on the iOS app due to vandalism that was quickly reverted several hours ago. I think the image was added by an LTA who frequently targets the TFA. In any case, there is little reason this image needs to be on any article. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Done thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Fuck off Wikipedia.jpg
For the Criticism of Wikipedia article Synotia (moan) 13:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I think that's a bad editorial decision, as it's not criticism, but I'll add the exception. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Request for exception
Request for image File:Raphe1 Labels.jpg to be displayed on the article perineal raphe. Piccco (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Clamps CBT.jpg
Please add File:Clamps CBT.jpg, which is a penis with a clamp. A user added this to Florida School for Boys. 2NumForIce (speak|edits) 22:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Done. -- Alexf(talk) 06:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- AlexfThe image was already being used on Cock and ball torture where it seems very appropriate. It has been on that article since at least the end of 2021 apparently without problems. Please make an exception for that page.Naraht (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- AlexfThe image was already being used on Cock and ball torture where it seems very appropriate. It has been on that article since at least the end of 2021 apparently without problems. Please make an exception for that page.Naraht (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Red link
There's a red link now. See c:Special:Redirect/logid/288149321 for the previous and current names. Nardog (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
File:PNBR-2016-20 (29566148206).jpg
Please see File:PNBR-2016-20 (29566148206).jpg, which is a photo of the World Naked Bike Ride that clearly shows the penis of a male bicycle rider at the beginning of a group of bicyclists. A user(s) has added this to the main article about the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which is frequently accessed by children researching this city page for school projects, and has also been added to the articles: List of tourist attractions in Philadelphia, World Naked Bike Ride, and Clothing-optional bike ride. There is little reason this image needs to appear on the main Philadelphia article or on the list of tourist attractions. 47thPennVols (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @47thPennVols:. Not done I'm afraid that type of editorial decision is out of scope for this list, which is a rather blunt tool to help prevent vandalism. Please edit the pages yourself or reach a consensus on the relevant talk pages. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Scrotum piercing.jpg
Request to enable this image on this article: Hafada piercing specifically in the gallery, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hafada_piercing#Gallery The image pertains to this article, which is about scrotal piercings.Tetsuo (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Hood-piercing.jpg
- :Hood-piercing.jpg
Request to enable this image on this article: Clitoral hood piercing, specifically in the gallery, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Clitoral_hood_piercing#Gallery Tetsuo (talk) 03:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Add an NSFW warning and blur NSFW pictures until you click them.
If you try to access a page about, or that contains, NSFW content, add a warning.
For example:
[
NSFW Warning
The page you are trying to visit contains NSFW content.
Do you want to continue?
]
If the user clicks no, they are redirected to the homepage or to their previous page. If they click yes, they are granted access to the page.
As well, blur any NSFW images until a user clicks them.
For example, someone could blur any images that are on the bad image list, and serve warnings before being allowed onto the site on pages about sexual content or sexual topics, (caution, NSFW links ahead) like bondage, cock and ball torture, or sex machines or toys.
Pages that contain references to sexual topics or contain sensitive or inappropriate images, like circumcision or the human penis or vagina, should have any inappropriate images blurred until you click them. Juoig7799revived (talk) 17:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Has been discussed many times before, see here. And honestly someone who looks up articles about genitals shouldn't be too surprised to see pictures of genitals. Hut 8.5 17:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Anogenital_distance_female_and_male.jpg
Include the abbreviations as already displayed in the image also in:
Summary Description English:
Anogenital distance (AGD) of human female (left) and male (right). Measured from the center of the anus to the bottom of the labia minora (the fourchette; AGD-AF) and Clitoris (AGD-AC) in females or the underside of the scrotum (AGD-AS) in males.
- 2A01:C22:BC60:9800:50FF:754F:4F1A:7188 (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Vaginal opening description.jpg
This photo is being used by {{whois|Nguyen Dang Tiep}}
116.100.214.248 around wikinews as vandalism. 06:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC) T. S. Holdiness 06:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: It's already listed here, and this list only affects pages on this wiki. It has effect on Wikinews. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Flag_of_the_NSDAP_(1920–1945).svg
used by a sockpuppet 174.126.149.195 edit: Special:MobileDiff/1168299839. Notrealname1234 (talk) 23:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- This image is already listed, but it will need around 184 exceptions which weren't added at the time, which is a bit much, IMO. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Multiple files
Please add the following files:
Image list
|
---|
|
They were added by a vandal to multiple pages. --Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 10:50, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Swastika right-facing.svg
Also used by a sockpuppet. Special:Diff/1168588602 Notrealname1234 (talk) 22:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 7 August 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please add File:2015 0095z.jpg to the list it has been used to vandalize the 2023 Hazara Express derailment and 2023 Ashes series pages [8] [9] 138.0.152.210 (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Done Izno (talk) 21:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Senten bakıs - panoramio.jpg
File:Senten_bakıs_-_panoramio.jpg used for vandalism by socks – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 14:11, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Add to list
Hyphenation Expert (talk) 16:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Adding to list
been used as vandalism, not used on any pages on english wikipedia
Laoguama (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
add File:2014_A400z.jpg
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
used here for vandalism 82.117.95.243 (talk) 09:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 29 August 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add File:Swapa.jpg to the list. Penis used by a VOA. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 06:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Penis used several times by vandal:
- [Aug 30, 2023, 18:36]
- [Aug 30, 2023, 18:34]
- [Aug 30, 2023, 18:34]
- [Aug 30, 2023, 18:33]
- [Aug 30, 2023, 18:32]
- [Aug 30, 2023, 18:31]
— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 18:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Done but for the record the diff links you added are broken. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Add Dansk tissemand.jpg
Add this penis image to the bad image list because it is used by a vandal. signed, 64andtim (chat) 18:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 31 August 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add File:Nena Senos 016.jpg and File:Bella Vendetta crop.JPG to the list, breast images used exclusively for vandalism. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 17:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
See this edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Partofthemachine (talk • contribs) 17:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
ANI involving vandalism using pornographic images
This ANI concerns two users, 202.169.232.151 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and Tvyuubewatchercool (talk · contribs), who added pornographic images, mostly depicting naked men, to various articles. All of the edits adding such images have been RD3'd, but perhaps the images used should also be added to the bad image list. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Pisse.jpg
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the file Pisse.jpg to the bad image list because it is being used by an LTA. signed, 64andtim (chat) 05:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like it was just added. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 15:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 9 September 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
File:Gland.jpg: Penis vandalism. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 06:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- add file:Herezacsko.jpg as well. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 07:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 08:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 9 September 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add all images used by Tvyuubewatchercool (talk · contribs) and 202.169.232.151 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to the bad image list. I don't know which images were used, since all of the revisions that added pornographic images were RD3'd. This is related to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1138#202.169.232.151_obscenities_and_tampering. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 10 September 2023
Please add the buttplug 3.jpg image. It is used by a vandal recently for vandalism. 85.101.223.166 (talk) 08:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC) Done – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Add buttplug.jpg as well. 85.101.223.166 (talk) 11:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 15 September 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add File:Dirty diaper filth 4938494.png because it was used by an LTA. Thanks. Signed, 64andtim (any problems?) 03:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 15 September 2023
This edit request to full has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
File:MemyselfandI (12).JPG used by vandal at [10]. There are probably other pornographic images that were used by the IP 82.117.89.0/24 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 25 September 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add File:D1050960.JPG, it's a penis picture. Also, please RevDel the already existing pics, so that the troll can't use em as trophies. WP:DENY! @Materialscientist Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 07:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done and revdel completed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 28 September 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add File:男性器を女性器に挿入している様子.jpg, used by this now-blocked user. Please also consider revdelling the edits where the image was added. Best, user:A smart kittenmeow 16:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done, and we have our newest admin Hey man im josh to thank for the revdel. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 30 September 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
File:開いたまんこ.jpg used by vandal [11][12][13][14]. —darling (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Human1.jpg
Please add the file Human1.jpg to the bad image list because it is being used by a vandal named Qwertyufan53. 2001:448A:11A3:1754:B03C:959:89CB:7DFD (talk) 09:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 7 October 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the following items on the list, which have been deleted:
- File:2014 A400z.jpg
- File:Balzak.jpg
- File:DC-7850.jpg
- File:DCS21422.jpg
- File:Hairy vulva.jpg
- File:Mini pene.jpg
- File:Reverse Cowgirl.jpg
- File:YouCut 20210319 095533377 1 .ogv
- File:阴茎 勃起.jpg
–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 16 October 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add File:Hamas_terrorists_murdering_civilians_in_Kibbutz_Mefalsim,_Israel_(October_2023).webm to the bad image list due to its gory nature and its potential for disruptive additions.
Also add exceptions for the current transclusions of that image as there is still a discussion whether to include the image on the project. Awesome Aasim 03:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose As far as I'm aware, potential for disruptive editing is not a valid reason for restriction. Neither is gore (see MOS:OMIMG). --
- Lenny Marks (talk) 13:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure countless other "bad images" from gore to pornography are added to this list regularly because of their lack of encyclopedic value and potential for disruption on most pages, even if the images never seemed to have been added yet. I also suggested whitelist 2023 Israel–Hamas war because that is where the image is being used right now and there is discussion about inclusion there. Awesome Aasim 14:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- What makes you think that images are pre-emptively added @Awesome Aasim? My understanding, based on the description at the top of the talk page, is that images included on this list are typically included due to their use in vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Okay I'll withdraw my request. I'll get consensus then reopen. Awesome Aasim 14:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- What makes you think that images are pre-emptively added @Awesome Aasim? My understanding, based on the description at the top of the talk page, is that images included on this list are typically included due to their use in vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure countless other "bad images" from gore to pornography are added to this list regularly because of their lack of encyclopedic value and potential for disruption on most pages, even if the images never seemed to have been added yet. I also suggested whitelist 2023 Israel–Hamas war because that is where the image is being used right now and there is discussion about inclusion there. Awesome Aasim 14:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn Awesome Aasim 14:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Awesome Aasim cool, thanks. -- Lenny Marks (talk) 16:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 6 November 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add File:Close-up_Reverse_WoT.jpg; see abuse in Special:Diff/1183720524 and Special:Diff/1183721058. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 16 November 2023
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "File:Girl in bra and panties - black and white cropped.jpg, except on Crotch" to "File:Girl in bra and panties - black and white cropped.jpg, except on Crotch, Panties"
OR
Remove "File:Girl in bra and panties - black and white cropped.jpg, except on Crotch"
This is a good picture for the panties article and this image is likely years past any vandalism spike. (Checked the archive for the addition time) A reasonable voice (talk) 18:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- I've added the exception. Image was added 14:52, 4 March 2021. In vandalism terms for this type of image, that's not particularly long. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, fair enough. Thank you! A reasonable voice (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Self Fisting.jpg
This is a request for File:Self Fisting.jpg to be used on the Fisting page on English Wikipedia. Thank you. CommandGenius1 (talk) 02:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Metal_Hegar_Sound_Being_Inserted_Into_A_Male_Urethra.jpg
Request to add the file Metal_Hegar_Sound_Being_Inserted_Into_A_Male_Urethra.jpg to the bad image list after its use in vandalism on Sounding rocket. 49.205.253.244 (talk) 09:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Files at User:Javadst/My Illustrations
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add these files to the list - see [15] for more background. Home Lander (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- These images are not being added maliciously, and removing them all would leave Piledriver (sex position) unillustrated. I wouldn't think this necessary. SWinxy (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not done. Evidently there is not consensus for this addition. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Why was File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg added on this list?
Just curious. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 09:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Looking through the note on the List and the suggestion to use another a version of the flag where the Arabic is either turned into blocks or deleted, it appears that the issue is that the Hezbollah flag with the Arabic has copyright issues and that it was placed here to keep from posting something with copyright issues.Naraht (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Penis asiatischer Elefant.JPG
Should this image not be allowed in this section to illustrate the anatomy of elephants? Jarble (talk) 20:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if that was a request, but it seems a reasonable suggestion so I've added the exception. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Can you put this image on the bad image list
Is this file File:Femalebutt.jpg 199.119.233.254 (talk) 05:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- The bad image list is generally for images which have been used for shock vandalism. Indication that the image has been used for vandalism is generally required for it to end up on the list (for example, the images for granted requests above and in the archives) However, as a personal comment, if this image (naked female buttocks without the anus being visible) makes you uncomfortable to the point that you request that it be on the bad image list, those images actually *on* the bad image list are likely to cause you *significantly* more uncomfortablity.Naraht (talk) 05:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- I saw someone used this image to vandalize page replace the cover art at Elio it is this edit https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Elio_(film)&oldid=1172611893 208.98.222.61 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Point taken. It appears that this particular user has an even larger list of files that they've used to vandalize other articles, for example the larger diffs in (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mopytxs). I'm not sure what the best way is to proceed here. A good chunk of the list was brought up in a list in the Archive 9 of this page without action and someone attempted bring notice to it on the ANI page (list includes File:01 pregnant woman.jpg Naraht (talk) 19:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- I saw someone used this image to vandalize page replace the cover art at Elio it is this edit https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Elio_(film)&oldid=1172611893 208.98.222.61 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Streisand Estate.jpg
This is a request that File:Streisand Estate.jpg be added to the bad image list. The image of the home is tagged with the celebrity Barbra Streisand's name identifying it as her home, and the home's geo-coordinates are embedded. A clear case of violation of privacy and that "the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered" under WP:BLP. Celebrities are known to be subject to stalkers. It is irrelevant that this photo is published elsewhere and has been for 20 years, or that it is the photo at the centre of what gave rise to the term "Streisand effect". Wikipedia can and should cover the "Streisand effect" as a term and phenomenon without publishing the photo, since the photo itself violates Wikipedia's own policies. Walton22 (talk) 03:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with this request on the merits (see discussion at Talk:Streisand effect) but the proper thing to do for a privacy concern would be to nominate the image for deletion on Commons – the bad image list is generally for media used as shock images. – Teratix ₵ 03:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Image used for vandalism
This pornographic image was used for vandalism here. It is otherwise unused and serves no encyclopedic purpose. blameless 05:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- Per above, please add the image mentioned to BIL. Awesome Aasim 01:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Miss Butterfly.ogv
To use at Le ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly. Zanahary (talk) 08:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Miss Butterfuly.ogv and File:Agenor fait un levage.ogv
Both for use on The Good Old Naughty Days. (both were used as part of the collection (AKA fr:Polissons et galipettes). Intend to expand The Good Old Naughty Days to match french version, all clips are at Commons:Category:Videos_from_Polissons_et_galipettes Naraht (talk) 05:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
NSFW Image attempted to use for vandalism
This NSFW image was attempted to be used for vandalism on 2 articles, the first one on February 6, 2024 on Bryce Harper and again on February 10, 2024 on Blue Devil (mascot). Can you put the image on the Bad Image List? Stewie&Cartman 19:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Addition request
This edit request to MediaWiki:Bad image list has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add File:Yoshitoshi tanuki.jpg to the list, with an exception for testicle. It was recently used here inappropriately (see also subsequent edits to that diff). MaterialsPsych (talk) 09:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done and the request above too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Requesting exception for legitimate use on Vaginal hypoplasia Dronebogus (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Dronebogus: Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
For this article. Lionel Cristiano? 16:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Fastily, can you do it? Thanks. Lionel Cristiano? 23:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done as it relates to another wiki, per above request. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
For this article. Lionel Cristiano? 16:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily Lionel Cristiano? 23:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Lionel Cristiano: Not done. This list has no effect on other wikis. For usage on trwiki, you need to find an administrator on trwiki who can edit tr:MediaWiki:Bad_image_list for you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Zzuuzz I understand now, thanks. Lionel Cristiano? 23:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Lionel Cristiano: Not done. This list has no effect on other wikis. For usage on trwiki, you need to find an administrator on trwiki who can edit tr:MediaWiki:Bad_image_list for you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Added entry, Why?
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-56576-0001, Berlin-Friedrichshain, Planschbecken.jpg? Is this considered Child Pornography due to the Child Nudity? Naraht (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping @Ingenuity: but I can say it was indeed being used repeatedly for vandalism/disruptive editing. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Addition request
Hi, File:Piledriver Sex Position V1.jpg, with exception I guess for articles such as Sex position.
(The image was used inappropriately on Wikidata not long ago. I know that this list doesn't affect other projects; this is just FYI).
Thanks! E L Yekutiel (talk) 07:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Wiki-doublepen.png
Requesting exception for double penetration The First Spinjitzu Master (talk) 20:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Masturbating secrets.gif
File:Masturbating secrets.gif has been used repeatedly for vandalism and disruptive editing. Ex: Special:Diff/1230506680 C F A 💬 03:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Added. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Requesting exception for use in Orgasm as the file shows pelvic floor contractions in a male. Rim sim (talk) 16:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Playing Hmong children.jpg
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
File:Playing Hmong children.jpg unless there are EF or other efforts to deal with this. Abecedare (talk) 15:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done Elli (talk | contribs) 20:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Osama bin Laden portrait.jpg
Requesting exception for Letter to the American People. Maxeto0910 (talk) 19:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done. I'm thinking we might consider removing this from the list at some point. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'd support that. The image depicts a well-known person of public interest, and therefore has many potential use cases throughout Wikipedia. Maxeto0910 (talk) 02:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support as well. Do we have any other "similar" photos in the list? (clothed, no massive disfigurement, etc.)Naraht (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think you'll agree it's going to be pretty offensive if it's used in the wrong place (probably how it ended up here in the first place). Anyway, for reference it was added in 2020 by Malcolmxl5, so let's casually float the idea their way. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- My memory of the summer of 2020 is pretty hazy but it’s likely it was being spammed across the encyclopedia by someone who thought it funny to do that. Perhaps they’ve gone away. Let’s remove it from the list and see. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- zzuuzz I think the difference with that one is that while there are a certain number of articles that Osama's face would be offensive on, for most of the images here, there are a certain number of articles that it would *not* be offensive on. For example, to pick a random image here, a photo of an inserted butt plug might be viewed as offensive on the page for M&T Bank Stadium (The stadium that the Baltimore Ravens play at) where Osama's face wouldn't be viewed in the same way. I don't know if there is anyway to *reverse* the Mediawiki tech to only ban it from a specific number of articles. In any case, I think we are on the same wavelength.Naraht (talk) 17:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- zzuuzz I think the difference with that one is that while there are a certain number of articles that Osama's face would be offensive on, for most of the images here, there are a certain number of articles that it would *not* be offensive on. For example, to pick a random image here, a photo of an inserted butt plug might be viewed as offensive on the page for M&T Bank Stadium (The stadium that the Baltimore Ravens play at) where Osama's face wouldn't be viewed in the same way. I don't know if there is anyway to *reverse* the Mediawiki tech to only ban it from a specific number of articles. In any case, I think we are on the same wavelength.Naraht (talk) 17:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- My memory of the summer of 2020 is pretty hazy but it’s likely it was being spammed across the encyclopedia by someone who thought it funny to do that. Perhaps they’ve gone away. Let’s remove it from the list and see. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think you'll agree it's going to be pretty offensive if it's used in the wrong place (probably how it ended up here in the first place). Anyway, for reference it was added in 2020 by Malcolmxl5, so let's casually float the idea their way. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support as well. Do we have any other "similar" photos in the list? (clothed, no massive disfigurement, etc.)Naraht (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'd support that. The image depicts a well-known person of public interest, and therefore has many potential use cases throughout Wikipedia. Maxeto0910 (talk) 02:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please exempt this img for profanity, where it is a good example of an obscene hand gesture. Thanks, Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 21:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Please add the image to the bad image list as it has been repeatedly used for Distruptive Editing by Socks of AveragePigs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) if it is possible to do that Thanks. Untamed1910 (talk) 16:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- I *really* don't expect this to be possible for the *Hundreds* of exceptions that would need to be made, with everything from lists of medalists in individual olympic sports where a citizen of Germany won a medal in the 1936 olympics to lists of Chancellors of Germany to all infoboxes of Battles that included the 3R. See https://linkcount.toolforge.org/?project=wiki.riteme.site&page=File%3AFlag+of+Germany+%281935%E2%80%931945%29.svg , that says used in 13,000 pages.Naraht (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- This answer certainly makes sense. I'm unaware of any technical limit to the number of exceptions, but if there are too many it makes page maintenance more difficult. Additionally, if the image is already in use on hundreds of pages, there's a very good chance that lots of pages which should be created, but haven't been yet, will need to be added as well. Animal lover |666| 07:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done, as above. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Untamed1910:A more careful check shows that this image is used on 119 template-namespace pages (one of these being a stub tag), including 14 subpages (documentation pages and usecase pages which transclude the templates and sansboxes with hardcoded copies of them). Even if listing the templates is good enough for the transcluding articles (I doubt it), needing to have them listed would be a maintenance nightmare. What may work would be to ask for an edit filter, which would cover anonymous and new users adding new direct uses of these images (if you try this, mention explicitly that your request here was declined due to the image being used legitimately on too many pages, since otherwise they will send you right back here as the more efficient way to do it), but I don't know if they will do it. Animal lover |666| 15:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Animal lover 666 It doesn't appear that there are any template exceptions in the Bad image list (three template talk, though). While I don't think this is the right tool, I'm not sure there is a great tool. :(Naraht (talk) 17:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- You'd need exemptions for both the template and its transclusions, which as you point out are both unmanageable anyway. I know of one example in the list which is File:Origin-of-the-World.jpg (examples: exempted / not exempted). I can say that we have had some 'adjacent' edit filters, but perusing the SPI for the first time I wonder if a dose of protection might be a better solution. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Animal lover 666 It doesn't appear that there are any template exceptions in the Bad image list (three template talk, though). While I don't think this is the right tool, I'm not sure there is a great tool. :(Naraht (talk) 17:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Untamed1910:A more careful check shows that this image is used on 119 template-namespace pages (one of these being a stub tag), including 14 subpages (documentation pages and usecase pages which transclude the templates and sansboxes with hardcoded copies of them). Even if listing the templates is good enough for the transcluding articles (I doubt it), needing to have them listed would be a maintenance nightmare. What may work would be to ask for an edit filter, which would cover anonymous and new users adding new direct uses of these images (if you try this, mention explicitly that your request here was declined due to the image being used legitimately on too many pages, since otherwise they will send you right back here as the more efficient way to do it), but I don't know if they will do it. Animal lover |666| 15:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done, as above. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- This answer certainly makes sense. I'm unaware of any technical limit to the number of exceptions, but if there are too many it makes page maintenance more difficult. Additionally, if the image is already in use on hundreds of pages, there's a very good chance that lots of pages which should be created, but haven't been yet, will need to be added as well. Animal lover |666| 07:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Caloocan Annual Tilbury Race 45.jpg
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
File:Caloocan Annual Tilbury Race 45.jpg has been abused frequently by LTA Velma Larkin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). jlwoodwa (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Elli (talk | contribs) 21:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
These images are now blacklisted on all Wikipedia articles, with no exceptions.
Should we be forbidden to display these images on articles about the human penis, urethra, or urination? Jarble (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- If you have any specific wish to include any one of these images in any one of these articles, make a specific edit request here to do so. If the request makes sense to the responding admin, the admin will undoubtedly permit it. Animal lover |666| 22:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I listed 3 articles and 3 images here. Are we not allowed to request whitelisting of more than one image on more than one article? Jarble (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Jarble we can whitelust them if they're on use or are going to be used but that needs to happen first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- The images are not currently in use, so they need to be whitelisted on these three pages before anyone can use them. Should the images be whitelisted on these pages if they are relevant and not too obscene or indecent to be displayed there? Jarble (talk) 21:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion at Talk:Urination#Do we need multiple pictures of people urinating in this article? seems to conclude that there were too many images in the article. Why not ask if other editors see some encyclopedic value in using one or more of these images there? Johnuniq (talk) 10:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq: The article has only one photograph of a person, since the editors in that discussion removed all of the other photos. The article's lead section is now illustrated with photographs of statues instead of real people. Jarble (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion at Talk:Urination#Do we need multiple pictures of people urinating in this article? seems to conclude that there were too many images in the article. Why not ask if other editors see some encyclopedic value in using one or more of these images there? Johnuniq (talk) 10:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- The images are not currently in use, so they need to be whitelisted on these three pages before anyone can use them. Should the images be whitelisted on these pages if they are relevant and not too obscene or indecent to be displayed there? Jarble (talk) 21:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Jarble we can whitelust them if they're on use or are going to be used but that needs to happen first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I listed 3 articles and 3 images here. Are we not allowed to request whitelisting of more than one image on more than one article? Jarble (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
I want to use this pic in a thread of X about Gil Scott-Heron, where i explain first some things about racism and crimes of racism in the previosly years. Jesús Báez Alcaide (talk) 09:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand "a thread of X about Gil Scott-Heron". If you want to post it on Twitter, that's up to you. Nothing here prevents that. This page concerns usage on Wikipedia, where the Gil Scott-Heron article doesn't seem a suitable place. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)