Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History of Canada

WikiProject History of Canada

Navigation (· changes)

Main Project page
Tools
- Templates
- Discussion
- Naming conventions
- Assessment (stats, list, log, links)
- Article alerts
- All related pages
Participants
To do

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historians?

Ian MacPherson (historian) was just tagged with the Wiki Project Canada History banner. This wikiproject doesn't seem to have a scope posted (or at least, I missed it, but I wouldn't think historians would be included in the project. The Canadian Education project would seem more fitting, though they focus on primary/secondary rather than post-secondary schools. There isn't yet a Canadian Biography wikiproject. Just thought it was something worth discussing... - TheMightyQuill (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for History of Canada

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looting of Battleford

Proposed merger of Looting of Battleford into the history section of Battleford, Saskatchewan please comment if you have an opinion one way or t'other. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 16:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

first cinema in Montreal/Quebec/Canada/North America?

[1] 70.55.86.100 (talk) 07:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia gold rushes

I just expanded this; it had had no lead on it and had only been a list and should always have been more; a "short" historical precis is so far completed, more or less, on the Queen Charlotte, Fraser and Cariboo Rushes; I don't have the energy to tie together all the minor gold rushes into a short narrative but intend to do so soon; many of them need much fuller writeups or new articles, particularly the Stikine and Cassiar rushes. More citations to come, sorry can't do inlines, working from memory not books on hand. I'm thinking that History of the British Columbia gold rushes, might work better and there hsould be a parallel History of mining in British Columbia (is there a History of mining in British Columbia article already? Not sure...) because coverage of gold mining is often impossible without discussion of silver, galena and also even coal; the mining industry is one industry; there's also a need for articles on teh "silver rushes" particularly the Silvery Slocan....anyway g'nite, it's 2:31 am; I never did get to the passage I had framed in mind when I started writing it, maybe it'll still be fresh tomorrow....see Talk:British Columbia gold rushes for further comments.Skookum1 (talk) 06:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Fort St. Jean → Siege of Fort St. Johns

Siege of Fort St. Jean → Siege of Fort St. Johns has come up on WP:RM. 76.66.200.131 (talk) 13:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burning of the Parliament Buildings in Montreal

Translated it from the French. Lots of red links still. Many things left to be done to improve it, but it is a start. :-) -- Mathieugp (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Giguère

Hi, If you really have an interest in this page (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Robert_Gigu%C3%A8re) and similar pages, I strongly suggest you get acquainted (and eventually intervene) with this link: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Demande_de_restauration_de_page#Robert_Gigu.C3.A8re.C2.A0.28d.C2.A0.C2.B7.C2.A0h.C2.A0.C2.B7.C2.A0j_.C2.A0.C2.B7.C2.A0.E2.86.B5.29

In short, Utilisateur:LPLT in the French Wikipedia eliminated the french version of the page 3 hours after I posted the first draft of it.

What do you think if I cite page http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability ?

it is important to not just consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be. Remember that all Wikipedia articles are not a final draft, and an article can be notable if such sources exist even if they have not been added at present. Merely asserting that such sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially as time passes and actual proof does not surface. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate unless active effort has been made to find these sources. For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort.

This guy apparently has not read that, nor the french version. He is on a rampage to eliminate all biographical pages he judges are only of a genealogical nature and his list includes the English page on Robert Giguère, and possibly more pages YOU care about.

Thanks for your support, Alainr345 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alainr345 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:14, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Pierre Du Gua de Monts

Someone looking for a challenge should improve this article. It appears the name used took precedence over actual editing and checking facts. Cheers! --Stormbay (talk) 22:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC: Territorial evolution of Canada

I have nominated Territorial evolution of Canada for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello I am Moxy and i make portals. Recently there has been a change to the Template talk:WikiProject Canada, this has made me aware that you guys do not have a portal. Was thinking of making a portal for you guys if you think its something appropriate to have. And if you would like one ...what would be the main articles you would like to see appear in it.. For an example of what i do see --> Portal:Ottawa...pls let me know if you would like one!!!..Moxy (talk) 23:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

all done--->Portal:History of Canada... {{Portal|History of Canada}}

History of Canada going to GA review soon

I am looking for comments and some copy editing if someone is willing of our History of Canada article before i bring it to GA review!...can leave comment at User talk:Moxy#Re:History of Canada .. thanks Moxy (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Canada articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the History of Canada articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absalom Greeley & Nathaniel Currie

Hi there, I'm kind of new to Wikipedia. Canadian pre-confederation history is my area of interest. I'm looking for some input into the articles Absalom Greeley and Nathaniel Currie (Ontario Politician). It would be great to get some pictures and I've looked all through the images on Wikipedia, but to no avail..alas! Any idea where I can get some. These are fairly obscure MPPs in the 1st Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Any other comments most welcome. Thanks CJ_WeißSchäfer (talk) 03:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about an article title

Hi. People in this WikiProject might be interested in weighing in on a discussion over at Talk:British Canada (1763–1867)#Request for comment about title. Cheers. -GTBacchus^(talk) 23:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:History

Is up for FPOC. This is one of the highest (if not the highest) visibility portal on Wikipedia, I recommend commenting on it! Cheers, ResMar 23:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's History Month

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:History of Canada will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in within Canadian history. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just Published! Could someone rate this?

Hello,

I just published an article I've been working on for a week or so, Princess Theatre, Edmonton. I believe it's in the scope of your project. Would anyone be able to go over there and rate it for me?

--Rawlangs (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Big Dan Mine

Hello. Could someone please do a peer review for the Big Dan Mine article? The peer review can be found here. Thanks. Volcanoguy 22:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to redirect Canadian related project talk pages

Please see Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect Canadian related project talk pages.Moxy (talk) 17:42, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Secord FAC

I've just nominated the Laura Secord article as a Featured Article Candidate. Any feedback or other input on the nomination would be much appreciate. Curly Turkey (gobble) 21:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Canada under British rule (1763-1867) and BNA articles

I just added mergeto/from templates to Canada under British rule (1763-1867) and British North America articles, as they cover the same content. Merge discussion is on the BNA page, which I think is the better title.Skookum1 (talk) 02:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Begbie re Hanging Judge and deletion of item on his page

An IP user has removed this and I think it's in the sources; it's commonly observed about him, the allegation that this is "unproven innocence" by the IP user is questionable. Even in the case of Klatsassine, he didn't want to hang him but had to because of the legal code. It needs restoration and citation, either from works like Scholefield and Howay or from the more modern books about him. Removing this is highly POV, in my opinion, and knowing quite a bit about him.Skookum1 (talk) 05:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canada History Portal Template

A question: why does the template for the History of Canada Portal use the Red Ensign? It was never Canada's official flag, and in fact the Maple Leaf has been Canada's flag longer than the version of the Red Ensign used in the portal: Maple Leaf from 1965 to present (48 years); Red Ensign (1921 to 1965, 44 years). Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 18:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure ...my guess is that its historical in nature? When the portal was created I used File:Canadian Coat of Arms Shield.svg to match Template:History of Canada sidebar. Not sure when or who changed it. We use the main modern flag in the CAnada portal..so we should use something different here......and it should be historical in nature I would guess. Any suggestions?-- Moxy (talk) 18:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it need to be different from the Canada Portal? I'd think we should just use the Maple Leaf. The difference is then in the wording on the portal, rather than the flag. In addition to the short time that the Red Ensign was used by the federal government, there's also the fact that when reproduced at the small size in the portal box, it's not readily identifiable: is it the Canadian Red Ensign? the flag of Ontario? the flag of Manitoba? the flag of Bermuda? The text is already the main way of distinguishing that portal from others. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 08:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is part of this page blue, but not the rest?

Is there a reason for it, or just some quirk in the coding for the page that I'm missing? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 21:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Albion-in-BC theory being met with dismissal on Talk:New Albion despite sources

Cross-border and shared-history articles with competing USian and "BPOV" (British Point of View) issues I've seen before re Oregon Country and the various Columbia River/region and border dispute articles; it's been much in evidence re Nova Albion, the article for which is in the USian 'official' form of New Albion. Please see Talk:New Albion#BPOV vs USPOV: Nova Albion re BC as to the legitimacy of the theory and who says what about it that the Point Reyes advocates/aficionados style as "rubbish" and a "fringe theory". I'll leave it at that, other than to direct you to the article's history to see my additions which were trashed and sneered at.....this is not an insignificant topic in terms of BC history or its significance in general; but USPOV is having none of it. Not in Wikipedia, that is.Skookum1 (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leaflet for Wikiproject History of Canada at Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:

Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 12:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

expansion/split of history section of the Victoria article proposed

Not that I have time to work on it, but please see Talk:Victoria,_British_Columbia#expansion_-_split.3F_-_of_history_section_needed and also the new further readings on Richard Blanshard and Colony of Vancouver Island.Skookum1 (talk) 08:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move proposal: Disambiguate Burning of Parliament (British) and Burning of the Parliament Buildings in Montreal

There is a proposal to move Burning of Parliament to Burning of British Parliament and Burning of the Parliament Buildings in Montreal to Burning of Canadian Parliament. Please take part in the discussion at Talk:Burning of Parliament#Requested move 8 May 2015. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 15:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Pride!

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events

When? June 2015

How can you help?

1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here

2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)

3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

(timestamp may not be accurate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Another Believer (talk • contribs) 15:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikipedia Library donations

Hello all, I wanted to let you know of some recent donations we just opened up at the Wikipedia Library, including Canadian portal WP:Erudit. Please sign up for the accounts if you think you can use them. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 00:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Turn of the century Yukon photographs

Hello there. I just finished uploading a collection of photographs by Eric A. Hegg to Commons. The photos are from around the turn of the century (1900), and a lot of them were taken in the Yukon or British Columbia, and might be of interest to you guys. Images that need to have their categories checked are at commons:Category:Images from the Eric A. Hegg Photographs Collection to check, and a list of all the images is available at commons:Category:Images from the Eric A. Hegg Photographs Collection to check. Hope they are useful. BMacZero (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox_folk_song

You are welcome to discuss the newly created {{Infobox folk song}} and its future here. --Tamtam90 (talk) 07:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

An RfC has been posted at Talk:Jacques Goulet#RfC: Should the citations in this article be changed to Harvard style?. Your comments are invited.- Mr X 🖋 22:29, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. — The Transhumanist 07:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archival photos from Canadian Museum of History

Hello, I am working on uploading images from the archival collections of the Canadian Museum of History, my employer. Images uploaded so far are tagged with the category Images from Canadian Museum of History. We're just doing small batches for now, uploading once a week. Please feel free to use these images in articles as useful! Oh, and if anyone knows how to add source URLs in the image summary, please contact me. We'd love to add permalinks into our catalogue, as LAC does with their images (and NARA and Library of Congress) The Raven's Librarian (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages

Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages...--Moxy 🍁 22:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrecks of HMS Erebus and HMS Terror National Historic Site

I just created a stub for this historic site as I had a couple of photos to add to it. I am not normally a contributor to Canadian content on Wikiepdia so I am not sure what date format to use, what infobox etc, and whatever other consensus may apply to such an article. So I would appreciate anyone more familiar with the norms of articles of this type to do fix my mistakes and hopefully add more content. There are quite a number of sources out there. Thanks Kerry (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject History needs people

Hi everyone. I am the new coordinator for WikiProject History. we need people there!! right now the project seems to be semi-inactive. I am going to various WikiProjects whose topics overlap with ours, to request volunteers.

If you have any experience at all with standard WikiProject processes such as quality assessment, article help, asking questions, feel free to come by and get involved.

and if you have NO Experience, but just want to come by and get involved, feel free to do so!!!

For anyone who wants to get involved, please come by and add your name at our talk page, at our talk page section: WikiProject History needs you!!!!

Alternately, if you have any interest at all, feel free to reply right here, on this talk page. please ping me when you do so, by typing {{ping|sm8900}} in your reply.

we welcome your input. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 20:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of move discussion: 2011 Canadian federal election voter suppression scandal → Robocall scandal

I have proposed this article be moved to its redirect Robocall scandal. The discussion is taking place here.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 22:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

new article about history of uranium mining in Bancroft, Ontario

Hi everyone, I wrote this article which just got approved, I thought some of you might enjoy it, it's mostly about the history of uranium mining in eastern Ontario https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_the_Bancroft_area CT55555 (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

historical reputation of John McDonald

Yesterday I added this quote on the historical reputation of John A McDonald and it got reverted by Ak-eater06, who said it needed approval here. It's a Maclean's summary of their survey of 117 historians and experts. survey of 100+ historians and experts and provides a consensus view of his achievements and negatives. @Ak-eater06:

According to historians Norman Hillmer and Stephen Azzi, a 2011 poll of 117 historians and experts voted Macdonald as the "second best" Canadian prime minister behind only Sir Wilfrid Laurier . He was

praised as the country's creator. The first prime minister, he built a transcontinental railway, championed immigration, secured the West for Canada, and developed a Canadian manufacturing sector with his National Policy of high tariffs. He held together his diverse party and led it to six election victories, a Canadian record. In retrospect, these accomplishments overwhelm Macdonald's many failures: his inability to maintain harmony between English- and French-speaking Canadians, his mishandling of the Metis and First Nations issues and, in the phrase of University of the Fraser Valley historian Barbara Messamore, the "demonstrable corruption" of his government. Several of our respondents specifically mentioned Macdonald's alcoholism and the Pacific Scandal, in which the Conservative party received hundreds of thousands of dollars from entrepreneurs who won the government's approval to build the national railway. Most of our analysts nevertheless agreed with historian Dean Oliver's assessment: "Macdonald was a flawed but magnificent man who created a party, a country, and an identity, one great scandal (and a couple of fingers of strong drink) at a time." [ref]Norman Hillmerand Stephen Azzi, "Canada's Best Prime Ministers" Maclean's, 20 June 2011 Vol. 124, Issue 23. [/ref]

Rjensen (talk) 20:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging User:GoodDay. Ak-eater06 (talk) 20:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really supportive of adding office performance ratings to bios of politicians. Reckon, we'll have to see what others views are on this matter. GoodDay (talk) 20:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All our biographies of major political figures include their achievements and failures, as seen by reliable sources. the "ranking 1-2-3 is a journalistic feature but it has long been in the article and is still in the lead. Rjensen (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of United Empire Loyalist descent has been nominated for discussion

Category:People of United Empire Loyalist descent has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.— Qwerfjkl talk 21:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello,
Please note that St. Lawrence River, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
_{Delivered by — MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team}[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Wildrose Party

Wildrose Party has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]