User talk:Serial Number 54129/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20

Please comment on Talk:Political views of American academics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jabel Mukaber

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jabel Mukaber. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Living dinosaur

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Living dinosaur. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of flags by number of colors

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of flags by number of colors. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Żegota

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Żegota. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Afsharid dynasty

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Afsharid dynasty. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Khalistan movement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Khalistan movement. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Civility in infobox discussions case opened

You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Pontvallain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Patrimony and David II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Uurgh. 🍍 >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 09:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Jogi.jewels

A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Jogi.jewels, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 10:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
730		Joseph Bonanno (talk)	Add sources
468		Somerset House (talk)	Add sources
2,321		Duke of Norfolk (talk)	Add sources
156		John Howard, 1st Duke of Norfolk (talk)	Add sources
42		Battle of Nájera (talk)	Add sources
4,255		Son Heung-min (talk)	Add sources
61		Reading education in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
102		Extensive reading (talk)	Cleanup
46		Balanced literacy (talk)	Cleanup
7		Organisation of the Scottish Labour Party (talk)	Expand
260		Hindi literature (talk)	Expand
50		Writing assessment (talk)	Expand
778		Viola Liuzzo (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
350		Pargalı Ibrahim Pasha (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
47		Key Words Reading Scheme (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
744		Language acquisition (talk)	Merge
562		National Insurance (talk)	Merge
164		Florin (Italian coin) (talk)	Merge
219		Aero (chocolate) (talk)	Wikify
1,851		Brian Dennehy (talk)	Wikify
550		Accelerated Reader (talk)	Wikify
4		Hap Hadley (talk)	Orphan
2		XinMo Li (talk)	Orphan
6		Construction Battalion Maintenance Unit 302 (talk)	Orphan
49		Pointe Saint-Mathieu (talk)	Stub
15		John Grey (knight) (talk)	Stub
21		Jenny Marra (talk)	Stub
82		Dead or Alive (novel) (talk)	Stub
22		James Kelly (Scottish politician) (talk)	Stub
8		John Scrope, 4th Baron Scrope of Masham (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert de Umfraville

The article Robert de Umfraville you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert de Umfraville for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John de Mowbray, 3rd Duke of Norfolk

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John de Mowbray, 3rd Duke of Norfolk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Minsterworth

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Minsterworth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 14:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Minsterworth

The article John Minsterworth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Minsterworth for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 04:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

• Cheers. In your own time, of course. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 18:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Minsterworth

The article John Minsterworth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Minsterworth for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 06:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Very sorry to put you out old chap  :) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Premature archiving

[1] Please don't. This is an active discussion. Coretheapple (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Explained here; thank you for making a more reasonable point than that in the section above, which does not, of course, endear itself to receiving anything approaching a civil reply. Or even a reply at all. Cheers, >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Although validation is not a requirement, neither is it unwelcome. Thanks, all. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 11:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

It's not validation. The subject of this note was your archiving, not the merits of your position. Coretheapple (talk) 18:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Just so; it was estblished that it was not in fact an active discussion. That suffices, and I thank you for your note. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 18:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dolly Rudeman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dolly Rudeman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Pontvallain

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Pontvallain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alex Shih -- Alex Shih (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, thank yooou Mr. Alex  ;) in your own time of course. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radmin (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Radmin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Radmin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Serial Number 54129! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

• Excellent news, MatthewVanitas, thanks vry much. The system works. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 21:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

No worries; the topic itself may be valid, but it's hard to tell since the bulk of the citations are to the company itself, their forum, their manuals, etc. Bluntly, we don't care what a company says about itself, we care what outside experts have to say about it. Detailed explanations of a product line, with no indication these details are taking the media by storm, are usually big red flags that a page is an advert rather than a neutral description. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@MatthewVanitas: Quite  :) Happy editing! ;) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 21:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

My bust, I thought you were the originator since you're listed as the Submitter. I was wondering why such a draft from an experienced editor. Ah well, back to the salt mines go I. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918 Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal

The article Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 (talk) 17:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

​ That's handy 'Arry :) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 17:56, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

• @Iazyges: Many thanks; when do we start? >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 14:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

  It should be relatively soon. I've taken on a number of GAN's (21 at current count), yours are #7, 9, and 11. I should be able to get to them this weekend. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Creton

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jean Creton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

• Just like the 38—you wait for ages and three come along at once!  :) 16:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eric Corbett -- Eric Corbett (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
116		Hinduism and other religions (talk)	Add sources
340		Fountains Abbey (talk)	Add sources
52		Margaret, Duchess of Norfolk (talk)	Add sources
3,428		Ihana Dhillon (talk)	Add sources
2,562		Chow Chow (talk)	Add sources
247		Dandiya Raas (talk)	Add sources
26		Hailes Abbey (talk)	Cleanup
76		Hindu art (talk)	Cleanup
142		Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan Educational Trust (talk)	Cleanup
2,638		Automotive industry (talk)	Expand
477		Manipuri dance (talk)	Expand
939		Kuchipudi (talk)	Expand
80		Gulal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
343		Hindu–Islamic relations (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,554		MS-DOS (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
913		Kayastha (talk)	Merge
57		Parameshwara (God) (talk)	Merge
21		Dhanurmas (talk)	Merge
160		Paul Henry (actor) (talk)	Wikify
139		Lisa Dillon (talk)	Wikify
96		Frank Carson (talk)	Wikify
2		Kamiasō Dam (talk)	Orphan
7		Bhavan's Vidya Mandir, Eroor (talk)	Orphan
14		Adarsh Vidya Mandir (talk)	Orphan
37		DOS/4G (talk)	Stub
6,692		Hate Story 4 (talk)	Stub
364		SNAC (talk)	Stub
388		Jonathan Pie (talk)	Stub
46		Īśvarism (talk)	Stub
2		Chester Carmelite Friary (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Pontvallain

The article Battle of Pontvallain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Pontvallain for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alex Shih -- Alex Shih (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Haroo  :) cheers Alex; like a Guinness, "Worth Waiting For"  :) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 16:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Haha, I've got to go to one of these London meetups soon. Alex Shih (talk) 16:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

*hic*  :) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates}

Your GA nomination of William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby

The article William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Ferrers, 5th Baron Ferrers of Groby for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke

The article John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Creton

The article Jean Creton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jean Creton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Blimey

Thanks. ...SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 08:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey

The article Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dispute between Darnhall and Vale Royal Abbey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

External links, not See also

Back in Nov & Dec you cleaned up some additions by User:Genealogyinterest, moving their added ipms to a See Also section. While you were correct that it did not belong in the body, a See Also section is for other relevant Wikipedia pages, not links off-site. If you find yourself making similar corrections in the future please use 'External links' or 'Further reading' headings for links to off-site material. Agricolae (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

I accept your thanks, Agricolae, cheers —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 16:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parliament of 1327, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Registrar and Chancery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Done —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 10:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
15		Belarusian Central Council (talk)	Add sources
317		Russian Liberation Army (talk)	Add sources
109		Lwów Ghetto (talk)	Add sources
38		Andrew Pilley (talk)	Add sources
17		Double Glazing & Conservatory Ombudsman Scheme (talk)	Add sources
8		Association for the Conservation of Energy (talk)	Add sources
589		Old Bailey (talk)	Cleanup
13		Phlegm (artist) (talk)	Cleanup
19		Latvian Auxiliary Police (talk)	Cleanup
304		Big N' Tasty (talk)	Expand
22		Green electricity in the United Kingdom (talk)	Expand
194		McDonald's legal cases (talk)	Expand
813		Polish collaboration with Nazi Germany (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
307		Blue box (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,792		Fast food (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
85		Pizza al taglio (talk)	Merge
2,541		International System of Units (talk)	Merge
42		Pizza by the slice (talk)	Merge
10		Melrose Resources (talk)	Wikify
4		Franco-British Nuclear Forum (talk)	Wikify
25		Graffiti in Toronto (talk)	Wikify
3		Hamu Shiru (talk)	Orphan
2		Collective switching (talk)	Orphan
5		AsterRIDE (talk)	Orphan
3		2nd Parliament of Queen Elizabeth I (talk)	Stub
3		Al-Hasan ibn Adi (talk)	Stub
3		Sheikh Adi ibn Sakhr (talk)	Stub
83		Cadent Gas (talk)	Stub
4		Sheikh Sharaf ad-Din ibn al-Hasan (talk)	Stub
6		Max & Ivan (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Serial Number 54129. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Berture77 (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians Review essay: K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Red Baron Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Elizabeth Paston

Hello! Your submission of Elizabeth Paston at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
731		Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York (talk)	Add sources
120		Philip Wentworth (talk)	Add sources
3,319		Wars of the Roses (talk)	Add sources
2,723		Henry VI of England (talk)	Add sources
16		Omni Park (talk)	Add sources
65		Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (talk)	Add sources
13		Chantilly Conferences (talk)	Cleanup
175		Rift (video game) (talk)	Cleanup
170		Grinding (gaming) (talk)	Cleanup
91		Auckland Council (talk)	Expand
927		Team Fortress 2 (talk)	Expand
784		Garry's Mod (talk)	Expand
487		EverQuest (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
16		Artane Castle Shopping Centre (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
36		Holocaust studies (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
867		Buggery (talk)	Merge
803		Sodomy law (talk)	Merge
1,383		Blenheim Palace (talk)	Merge
575		Phantasy Star Online 2 (talk)	Wikify
814		Borderlands (video game) (talk)	Wikify
251		Óró sé do bheatha abhaile (talk)	Wikify
5		Ruth Mazo Karras (talk)	Orphan
80		Medieval female sexuality (talk)	Orphan
4		Deborah R. Brock (talk)	Orphan
134		Mack Beggs (talk)	Stub
59		Provisions of Oxford (talk)	Stub
56		System under test (talk)	Stub
2		Mystacoleucus marginatus (talk)	Stub
28		Model parliament (talk)	Stub
5		John Pecche (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Elizabeth Paston

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Pbsouthwood RfA

Hi 54129,

I didn't ask you to post a question, and if I had intended to ask one I would have done so myself, so could you please remove the misleading "on behalf of" from yours?

Thanks. – Joe (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Since you haven't deigned to respond I've struck it myself. – Joe (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John/Eleanor Rykener

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John/Eleanor Rykener you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 02:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575)

File:Anne Anderson05.jpg

Clawed Frenchman (left)

-EEng

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros

The article William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Darnhall Abbey

The article Darnhall Abbey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Darnhall Abbey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parliament of 1327

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parliament of 1327 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parliament of 1327

The article Parliament of 1327 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Parliament of 1327 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1385)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article English invasion of Scotland (1385) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

John Fresshe bibliography

Hi, I noticed you removed the author links I added to the bibliography on John Fresshe with the comment "what is the point, when they're mostly red???" Obviously, it's a matter of taste and if you care that much, then do remove them. But the point is that all of those red links are to academics who would pass our notability test and including them aids article creation as outlined at WP:RED. (There was a good article written about this in the Wikipedia Post a few years ago but I can't find it now.) Indeed, I had planned to revisit the page and use those red-links to do just, as I am about to do with Paul Brand (historian). Anyway, I just thought I'd answer your question. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC).

Quite. I couldn't find it either. Cheers! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 15:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John/Eleanor Rykener

The article John/Eleanor Rykener you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John/Eleanor Rykener for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 22:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Cheers Usernameunique; great review (cf. above!), and many thanks for it. If you're interested, and not Eleanored-out  ;) the peer review is open here. Cheers! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 11:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Fresshe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Fresshe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Just a bit help

Hi Serial Number 54129. I wrote some articels in german Wikipedia (even some excellent ones, but some years ago). Wanted to do the first try on the english site. Sorry that my english is not perfect. Could you give me some help on Sopro Bauchemie. That would be great. --Frank Winkelmann (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1385)

The article English invasion of Scotland (1385) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:English invasion of Scotland (1385) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Don't wish to be a stick in a mud, but Jonathan Sumption's book appears to be missing from the "Bibliography" section, so the citations give harv errors. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: Sticks should read page history. The harv errors exist because I began adding the Sumption material after the GA was over, but couldn't be arsed to piss about formatting them at 20:00 UTC.... —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 08:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: This month's external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Could you tell me what's going on with your DYK nomination Template:Did you know nominations/John–Eleanor Rykener? It seems to have been deleted from the server. Yoninah (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stateless nation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy quick!

That was probably the fastest response to a maintenance tag I've ever seen on Wikipedia! I felt bad sticking such an ugly tag on a GA, but I feel vindicated considering the issue was resolved in under ten minutes. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 09:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

@Lord Bolingbroke: No problem, and thanks for noticing...if you look at the GA, it was extremely thorough—yet this was the perfect example of how something can always slip through the net. So I think, frankly, even if it's a FA, a tag still draws necessary attention. Better to look ugly for ten minutes than unintelligible for days  :) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 09:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

The Thing

Hi Serial, have you finished your work on the Thing? I wasn't sure since some refs have links and others have just the author names. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:26, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

• From the editor: The Admin Ship is still barely afloat, while a Foundation project risks sinking

• Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?

• Op-ed: What do admins do?

• Opinion: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes

• News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania

• In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress

• Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page

• Featured content: New promotions

• Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed

• Traffic report: Endgame

• Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa

• Blog: Wikipedia should be open for editors in Turkey

• Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry

• Humour: Television plot lines

• Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors

• From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

I want to give barnstar to these people. You can't revert.

I want to give barnstar to these people. You can't revert.

Ooops!

Sorry for the noise, the thanks that I've just sent you was an accident, I clicked on the wrong tab. Sorry, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Martin of Sheffield: No problem—sorry to hear you weren't just amused at my sardonic critique of...one Chris Green  :) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 15:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Citizen Cider

We are just trying to get our company a Wikipedia page as we are one of the larger cider producers in New England. This is the second time I’ve attempted to upload, I did not mean to make it bias. What can I do to get a page uploaded? Could you please help! CitizenCiderVT (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Darnhall Abbey

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Darnhall Abbey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for this Carabinieri, I'd forgotten this one: so far out of my comfort zone too. I quickly did some essential restructuring, etc/. and unfortunately wiped out you useful edits (I hadn't got an edit-conflict); however, I think I've managed to restore everything you did. Cheers! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 17:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Re: A barnstar for you

Hello there. Thanks for the barnstar, bro!--Muddyb (talk) 04:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Whats the dogs name

The one in the photo where it's all disoted and too bright to see anything.💸Money💸emoji💸^💴 16:05, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

At least you got the money emoji symbol right :D I_0urclc5 17:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Peter Matthews (artist)

The article Peter Matthews (artist) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Matthews (artist) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 00:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

damn you jimbo! I will never be able to quit

I guess I won't be able to quit the wiki ever. How are the things around here anyways? Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 11:53, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Still a sucker, FriyMan :D good to see you. How's tricks? —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 16:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Doing pretty good. I am trying to find a single thing to focus on instead of trying everything. Any advice? I am thinking of anti-vandalism or some other work or some other administrative duty. Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 17:35, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your signature definitely went through some modification, didn't it? Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 17:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Mentioned..

...over SoWhy's t/p.Ought to have dropped this, hours ago but....Best,~ Winged Blades^Godric 12:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

I know, I got SoWhy's ping. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 12:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inbreeding in fish has been accepted

Inbreeding in fish, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 » Shadowowl | talk 09:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Nuns

Thank you for the post on TonyBallioni's talk page. Would you be aware of any French or Anglo-Norman convents/nuns? - Conservatrix (talk)

Thank you for this Conservatrix. Well, we have categories on Category:French Roman Catholic abbesses and Category:French Roman Catholic religious sisters and nuns which should show you what needs expanding, and might again lead to redlinks. Also, catagories on fr.wp might be of use; (fr:Catégorie:Abbesse, for instance is pretty well populated. Some of them are well known, of course, and naturally have articles (as with much of WP the low-hanging fruit has already been picked), but I see a few do not—e.g., Alice of Savoy (fr:Alice de Savoie) and Barbara von Trüllerey of Schänis Abbey. I hope that helps, but this is not particularly my speciality I'm afraid so you probably know more of what to look for than I. Take care! —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 16:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Nun come to mind offhand. EEng 10:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

I thought I had a big list of them, but when I got to the bottom of the list I realized it was nun of the above. Primefac (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Nun today, thank you. —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 16:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Must you guys be so conventional? Please don't make a habit of it. --MelanieN (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey, that was pretty good. For those who take their humor seriously... Why Nuns are Funny. EEng 16:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Another superior admin, ordering us about... —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 16:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Clearly has a vested interest. Primefac (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Nun of you are novices at this pun thing are you? TonyBallioni (talk) 16:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

It's one of our bad habits. EEng 16:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

What did you think would happen if this many editors were cloistered together? Primefac (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Especially if they are professional punners Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

A Nun with a Pun can be a lot of Fun. (Sing to the tune of The Rain in Spain.) --MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

It saddens me when a usually respected editor engages in such nunsense. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Enough said. Have a drink on me y'all, or if you want, I can come a visiting. Lourdes 06:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Lourdes have mercy. EEng 13:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

What a wonderful convention of editors.―Buster7 ☎ 16:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey

Your stupid dog is so annoying and blocking some of the text in this gigantic talk page. Please consider removing it. Cheers ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 10:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

• @Abelmoschus Esculentus: Please sign in with your original account, unless you are a clean start? If so you should acknowledge this on your user page. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 10:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

While I don't agree with the wording, they got a point. Maybe you could set up archiving for this talk page and move the dog to another place where it's less in the way? Regards SoWhy 10:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

• @SoWhy: They are merely reacting because I have declined two of their recent CSDs. I have n reason whatsoever to encourage bad-faith posting; I wonder, indeed, that you do, albeit perhaps innocently. Cheers, —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 10:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129 and SoWhy: Sorry, I shouldn't be so uncivil. This account is my original account btw. I am not angry with you declining speedy deletion, one of them is a mistake, another was arguable, I guess. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 11:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

As an additional note, I was not conscious and sleepy today, maybe I should leave now. Sorry again. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 11:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm not involved, I just noticed this message and then that parts of the message cannot be read because there is a dog in front of it. Similarly, it took me a while to navigate this talk page with more than 150 posts. Regards SoWhy 12:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

And SoWhyI'm sure you regularly make the same point at—say—EEng (mandatory honourary example), or to be fairer, perhaps your colleagues in the administratura; thinking of DGG, Ezhiki, Ruud Koot...etc. Don't worry, the dog doesn't bite. Take care! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 14:15, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

I didn't see their talk pages, I saw yours. Besides, "what about X?" is not really a convincing argument, is it? Those talk pages are equally annoying due to their length but that does not make them examples you should emulate. After all, I could point out dozens of talk pages (including mine) that are archived regularly. As for the dog, the annoying part is not its existence but the placement, for example, I cannot read the section below completely because of it. Regards SoWhy 14:28, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@SoWhy: Clearly I disagree; the same question has been pretty comprehensively answered—and pretty robustly answered—above. Incidentally, I wasn't saying other stuff exists, I was observing that you would be arguing from a position of strength if you made similar points elsewhere. For the rest, it may be your screen settings/resolution as suggested in the section above, particularly on a mobile. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 14:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

As it happens, I am archiving some stuff "AWS"—not, I emphasise, because of your moaning :p —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 14:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Eighty three threads. Woooah. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 14:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Totally could have archived manually (like your talk page follower here), but then I get the gratification of OneClickArchiver... Alex Shih (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry

User:Cyber Nazrul got deleted. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Aaaand ​I am now going to tell RHaworth to undelete it, as I had already declined your misguided tag. You will soon find out that you should not rely on someone who is as busy as RH at the coalface to double-check your work for you; he is under the impression that you know what you are talking about. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 12:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Blocked (not requested by me). The account is indeed for promotion only. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cèllere Codex

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cèllere Codex you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 03:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mumbai

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mumbai. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kashmir under Pakistani Occupation

A tag has been placed on Kashmir under Pakistani Occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — kashmīrī ^TALK 20:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

@Kashmiri: Many thanks for this. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 09:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Galloway

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Galloway. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

• From the editor: If only if

• Op-ed: The last leg of the Admin Ship's current cruise

• Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality

• News and notes: Another newspaper for Wikipedia; Wikimania 2018 ends; changes at NPR

• In the media: Blackouts in Europe; Wikipedia and capitalists; WMF Jet Set

• Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals

• Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose

• Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes

• Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else

• Technology report: New bots, new prefs

• Gallery: Independence days, national holidays, and football – all in July

• Blog: Motivation of two editors

• Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons

• Humour: It's all the same

• Essay: Wikipedia does not need you

• From the archives: The pending changes fiasco: how an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jordan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jordan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 01:06, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political views of American academics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quneitra Governorate

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quneitra Governorate. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Ƣaznavid dynasty

Hi, thanks to restore speedy for Ƣaznavid dynasty. This is a redirect left after reverting a nonsense page move of earlier today. Redirect should be deleted as speedy, please don't require others to waste their time discussing it. Cheers, — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1385)

The article English invasion of Scotland (1385) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:English invasion of Scotland (1385) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

re Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Erasing_block_log

Hi Serial Number 54129 (also similar question of @Natureium:), re Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Erasing_block_log - the easiest answer here is that the logs represent what "was done" not "what should have been done" and administrative actions should generally be open for community review. If someone is blocked in error, then unblocked the unblocking admin (usually the first one) will generally specify that in the unblocking log entry (and if they don't they can always add a 1 second block to record it later). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, Xaosflux I do (really) know why it happens, and more to the point understand why—understanding being greater than knowledge in many cases, and particularly here! I was considering alternate dimensions, that's all :) cheers for the message though. Take care! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 18:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Rykener

I left a couple of comments on the FAC before it was archived; don't know if my comments will be useful, but thought I'd let you know in case you missed it. Best of luck with the GAC! Josh Milburn (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

@J Milburn: Many thanks for the note! I have to apologose for not acknowledging those points. Pwerhaps I was a trifle miffed at the time, who know! As it happens I think I tried to accommodate your suggestion/s with this edit—satisfactory, do you think? But thanks for sticking with it, I appreciate the effort. Perhaps I could ping you when it gets back for a re-run? —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 11:58, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, please do! I'm sure it'll pass at FAC sooner or later, but a topic like this is always going to be tricky; there's hardly a set way to approach articles about the topic, so there's going to be room for reviewers to disagree about your approach. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Oh- I left some comments after the ones you were responding to there. I'd seen that edit. Not a lot; don't worry about it! Josh Milburn (talk) 18:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

persistent

in this AFD your persistent is linked to village pump persistent pernial problems you know. Do you mean this seriously? Quek157 (talk) 08:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ha! Well spotted. I must have meant SIGCOV of course; thanks for pointing it out though—I've rectified it, and hope it didn't confuse too many other people! :) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 09:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

just wondering why isn't that case bio1e? Quek157 (talk) 10:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:William Bonville, 1st Baron Bonville

Despite your recent peacemaking initiative, this page still seems to be suffering rudeness and obtuseness. Clifford Mill (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Carousel

Module:Carousel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros

I must apologise for quite unintentionally leaving this article in a mess, which I did mean to tidy but forgot, and must thank you for starting to clean it up. Clifford Mill (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

• @Clifford Mill: No problem whatsoever. I must also apologise for the brusqueness of my edit-summary  ;) still, you did do me a favour really, as by drawing my attention back to the article I was able to work it up a little more. It's now been described as "a good, tight, biography with strong FAC prospects," which is positive. Thanks are due to you for creating those circumstanecs—cheers! Take care, and many thanks for the message, appreciated. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 12:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

closing

hi, I don't have xfd closer so I had to do manual plus I'm using desktop mode to edit as per normal using my handphone so is really difficult for me to close such things. I am thankful my 7885 Octa still can support such a non mobile mode edit. Thanks for closing.Quek157 (talk) 10:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

No problem Quek157, glad everything's ok—I just wasn't sure if you'd forgotten, that's all. Take care! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 10:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

I didn't but as I used manual, the process is almost impossible using a phone. I don't install the script as I don't close Xfd on a regular basis. Quek157 (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

List of YouTubers

There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

JuanRiley

Even though you are right that I shouldn't relish on an editor's block and I agree with your deletion here, I felt I had to make sure JuanRiley didn't come back, he is blocked and for very good reasons. He had been burden for me and many other editors. (N0n3up (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC))

Too late.

Howdy. Now that the Infobox civility case is closed. Editors can't comment on any of the closed cases' talkpages. GoodDay (talk) 13:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

I know; which is why I posted subsequently at the notice board. Thank you, ​for your diligence. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 13:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Pulp Fiction cast section

The cast section for [[Pulp Ducktech89 (talk) 11:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

• Please join the talk-page discussion to discuss your edits instead of blindly reverting. Please also desist from foolishness such as this. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 11:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

The cast section for Pulp Fiction is missing two notable roles, Paul Calderón as Paul and Joseph Pilato as Dean Martin. Both are presented prominently in the end credits but are not represented in the cast section. Even though they are minor roles, I still believe they should have a mention. I hope we can reach an agreement on this issue. Ducktech89 7:34, 23 March 2018 (WAST) Ducktech89 (talk) 11:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Remove Controversies

The article focus on the artist success and it's irrelevant to use it as reference; when the editor only bother to narrow their view into controversies. In wikipedia own words: Since the primary purpose of the Wikipedia is to be a useful reference work, narrow article scopes are to be avoided.

Artificially or unnecessarily restricting the scope of an article to select a particular point of view on a subject area is frowned upon, even if it is the most popular point of view. MrEditor 13:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Not done You have not said what eit you want making. Nothing to do. —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 13:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
• >Ping User:MrEditor. —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 13:45, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129 Remove controversies from the artist Personal Life, given the insufficient references and narrow use of information. MrEditor 14:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

• ​@MrCriticalOP: We'll come to that in a moment—exactly what you are asking for on Camila Cabello is increasingly unclear. Are you the same editor as User:Edpitor who has made a similar (and similarly unclear) edit-request half an hour before you did? And, why do you keep signing yourself as "MrEditor" when User:MrEditor is supposedly someone else? If you could clarify these points please, we can then discuss the edit-request you have made. Many thanks! —SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129, I thought we could use a different signature than our profile name. I'm not Edpitor by the way.

MrCriticalOP (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

It's ok, you can delete it. You'll never understand. MrCriticalOP (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Another Daily Mail RfC

There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Name

Have you actually changed your user name or what? Deb (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

• @Deb: Certainly not "what"  :) less flamboyant, no? >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 13:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Murder of Kylie Maybury

Hi, can you please look over Murder of Kylie Maybury ? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Paul Austin, good to hear—hope you're well. Sorry for the belated reply—I was out yesterday afternoon / evening. What am I looking at in that article? I mean, one such as that needs very strong sourcing, and at a cursory glance seems to have it. Got any views on it yourself? >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 10:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

YGM

Please check your inbox:)~ Winged Blades^Godric 15:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

I disinfect it regularly, officer  ;) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Hmm..

Hmm...Just FYI, there's still a 49% that's yuuuge...huh?! copyvio:) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 13:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Referencing

I see that you're struggling again with the referencing in John Neville, 1st Marquess of Montagu. In the #Arms section you've got an sfn which starts but doesn't finish, and a ref which finishes without having started. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks David; it's a work in progress atm, and the 'in use' template rather smacks of ownership, no? But we'll see what it looks like at draw of stumps  :) thanks for looking out! >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

@David Biddulph: Take a look at The Marquess now—slow but sure, just British Rail  :) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 20:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Male expendability

Did you actually check the Journal articles to verify the term "male expendability"? I have not seen anything with that term, rather it appears to me to be original research. ^{Atsme📞📧} 14:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

• [2] >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 15:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Interesting...my Google search brought up a variety of terms, including "male disposablity", "disposable male myth", and so on. That's what made me wonder if maybe it was an attempt to coin the phrase. I went to ProjectMed thinking maybe it was a medical or psychological issue, and so far, got this response, so I went to Project Sociology for more input. The title may well be notable enough. ^{Atsme📞📧} 16:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dolly Rudeman. c.1920-c.1930.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dolly Rudeman. c.1920-c.1930.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Mmmm tagged F1. I enk yow. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 06:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Serial Number 54129. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 14:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Neville-Neville feud

Not sure why you removed massive amounts of content from the article to revert to last stable version when there was no activity on the article, I assume it was a good faith error but please be more careful using Twinkle. (Unfortunately I reverted while logged into my alt account on mobile phone so I am leaving you a note about it) SeraphWiki (talk) 10:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

• Replied on both talk pages, but didn't call them or this, "shitty messages", as well as delighting in the fact that, whilst we probably all wish talk pages could be drama free, the one certain way of reducking drama... is not to cause it. Cheers! >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 18:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)