Jump to content

User talk:Serial Number 54129/Archive 20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22→Archive 25

Recent Revert

I have mentioned clearly as it doesn’t make sense to give random statement which is not even related to that section. Secondly that reference mentioned as oxford is not used there instead it is from other reference.So I have kept it in talk page. Joshi punekar (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Clash

Now I'm not saying that AN/I isnt a lovely bubble for the most thoughtful and considerate to wave their hammers, but remind you of anywhere. Also thanks for the Clash reverts. Yes, WP:lEAD absolutely applies. Paul Ceoil (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Right: The BUG EYES are an ANI dead give away. But thanks for making me feel old(er)...I saw DJ in brixton back in the day, they opened with Freak Scene. Classic tune.
As far as underrated Clash goes, my preference is Sandinista!, although perhaps that gained its cult following earlier? Cut the Ceoil Crap is coming on well—when, I suppose, you get the chance to actually write and not get pished about with {{fact}} tags... ——SerialNumber54129 17:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Put it this way man, if you hadn't seen the edits before I did, I would have gone all nuclear and would be now serving hard time, listening to Johnny Cash, in Brixton. ps am a Combat Rock man myself. Ceoil (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Could do with a Mediterannean holiday too  :) ——SerialNumber54129 18:17, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

And who can forget [1] Ceoil (talk) 23:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

You could always try [2], he said with weary eyes and several layers of irony. ps, Joan of Leeds is on my shit list. Dreadful story wonderfully told. you are warned. Paul Ceoil (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ceoil: "The Shit List, now, an interesting place to be / And now with Joan, straight to AfD!" :) ——SerialNumber54129 11:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Ha ha, no meant for ruthless copy editing and stinging edit summaries. Well you may quake in you boots. Ceoil (talk) 23:08, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ceoil: As for the state of the thing, [3] pretty well sums it up... ——SerialNumber54129 09:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Just hello

'99—identified by the barnstars—instructs User:Oshwah—identified by the hair and anti-vandal tool—on how to address him  :)

No other reason to drop by. And to say that it took me way too long to realize that Oshwah decided to call me Bob because it's embedded in my IP. Cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

I think that's very forward of Oshwah. He should call you Mr. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Nice one Gerda, hope your weekend is peaceful. ——SerialNumber54129 18:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, I just returned from listening to Passio, - stunning piece. Before, they sang his da pacem Domine, da pacem Domine, bolding by me. I escaped the tongue-biting ;) - Tomorrow, it will be listening to Die sieben Worte, - 'tis the season. Peaceful. Hope also for you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the move from draft of Bohumil Herlischka the other day. (Strange discussion on his DYK nom.) Similar case: Draft:Christian Elsner, and more to come, perhaps watch here? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: well. If a page is worthy of mainspace—or can be encouraged to be so—then it most certainly should be; happy to help. For example. Yes, that DYK is a bit curious isn't it? I might wait and see how it pans out; but I think I'll be needing a QPQ soon enough  :) I can kind of see the point though: you know I know nothing about classical music also, so all my edits are under advisement. Having said that, niche topics by their nature are going to have only a small pool of people who will find something automatically interesting; I think the aim with DYK (and that particular criterion) is to draw in the uninterested reader...and turn them into an interested one  :) ——SerialNumber54129 11:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
PS: You're allowed more than two comments in this discussion, at least; where on earth did that rule come from?! ——SerialNumber54129 11:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Starting at the end: I invented the restriction in WP:ARBINFOBOX (discussion of decision, look for "start today") as kind of a joke, and then they actually gave me that. Rescinded in 2015, but good practise, any discussion: make your point and walk away. Before: good approach in general, make them interested, and I thought "six operas" - no matter by whom - might do that. The article really might be boring to someone who needs an explanation for what "opera" is, - spare them that. Elsner: could you move that one? I feel I can't having done the update, and the one who sent it to draft hasn't answered. I hate giving our readers a red link, on top saying "was deleted", instead of an article, even if that article is not perfect, only decent. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: Elsner, already moved. I see what you mean re. comments; slightly odd though, creating your own "sentence"  :) ——SerialNumber54129 12:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
That whole case was so kafkaesque that taking it as a farce was the best attitude. Took me a while, though, and this "best remembered as a farce" helped ;) - mind the 2014 date. Then turn to Yeats and see some still seriously debating in 2019. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dolly Rudeman

The article Dolly Rudeman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dolly Rudeman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 09:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal

The article Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eric Corbett -- Eric Corbett (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Attapeu dam collapse

On 24 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Attapeu dam collapse, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cèllere Codex

The article Cèllere Codex you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cèllere Codex for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murder of Deborah Linsley

The article Murder of Deborah Linsley you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Murder of Deborah Linsley for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 17:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Anyway, down to more important matters, are you up for a pint or three at Pendrel's on Sunday? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ritchie333: Yep, I'll be there. Saw your note on Mediawiki and agree wholeheartedly with your thoughts  :) I'm going to Soho first (to take a photo) but it's only 10" walk away and I guess i could be there from 1-ish. What were your plans? —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 17:53, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for John/Eleanor Rykener

On 16 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John/Eleanor Rykener, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1394, John "Eleanor" Rykener was apprehended for committing a "detestable unmentionable and ignominious vice" in Cheapside and later confessed to having had sex with both friars and nuns? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John/Eleanor Rykener), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

My dear friend

I did not think it was necessary to wheel war over AN/I discussion closure; for this case, it was fine; but when are you going to run for RfA? Hundreds of us have been asking you and perhaps, GreenMeansGo. Alex Shih (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@Alex Shih: Look: I really must apologise about the ANI close. I assure you—no excuse that it is—that I didn't realise that You had already closed it, that SoV had re-opened it, and then I turned up in size thirteens  :) I saw the thread, went to the RfC, saw you'd closed that, and went back to the ANI thread... and closed it :o I'm afraid you and "hundreds" of others are now in the company of someone who didn't check the page history. A page one error! -and one which I will be rightfully condemned for. Sorry about that. Hope SarekoV didn't think I was stepping on their toes too. wel, clearly i did; but not deliberately. Nice message though: thanks! >SerialNumber54129...speculates 20:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I see what you're doing... a joint RfA so we can fail together an console one another. GMGtalk 21:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey, if you are all bound and determined to fall on your sword like that, this'll cut the sword budget considerably.... Anmccaff (talk) 21:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes, but then they're stuck together and would have to abide by the two-man rule for any administrative actions. Primefac (talk) 15:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
True dat  :) They're critical, I just bring the mass  ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serial Number 54129 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

RfA

I know a lot about RfA, prbably more than most because I pioneered the biggest ever investigation into it and I've voted on literally 100s of them. One of the problems of being an admin, is that people jump on us for anything they can and just love taking our comments out of context. You said 'extremely unfair'... Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:21, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

PS: We'll talk about it more when you run for adminship, and based on your history, I might even nominate you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

False accusations

A user accused me of vandalism, for no apparent reason. I had had no interaction with them. So I asked them why they did that. As a result of that, you've now accused me of harassment. Are you playing some kind of joke? 51.7.34.203 (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

@51.7.34.203 If you have been requested to stay of an editor's talk page, it is customary to respect that decision; see WP:NOBAN. Continuing to do so after having been asked to desist constitutes harassment; low-level harassment, perhaps, but still harassment. See WP:HUSH and WP:DRC. ——SerialNumber54129 15:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Sadly the IP continues it disruptive edits. Even after your note.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Why did you falsely accuse me of vandalism? 51.7.34.203 (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Then I ask you, why do you feel the need to harrass other editors even after being told by two editors to stop. Drop the stick.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Hermes Group

Thank you for your message. The addition was neutral and was by no means spam and I am disappointed that it was labelled something that it certainly wasn't. I merely wanted to add information that is missing, to what is a very flimsy paragraph. I have added something more now, but not the same information as before. I hope this is alright. CH-BUESI (talk) 11:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:AN

Did you intent to readd the discussion regarding El C to AN after I moved it to ANI? --MrClog (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ricky Megee

The article Ricky Megee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ricky Megee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Extremely impressive!

The Original Barnstar
For your original article Rose Street Club, truly a fantastic piece of work! Carrite (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes, thanks for this piece of anarchist history! czar 04:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
@Carrite and Czar: Thanks very much! I think the Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club might be next; not only is it copiously named, but it's a bit of local history for me, so that's added interest. Have a good Sunday! —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 16:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club

The article Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

A beer on me

A beer on me!
For your amazing work on articles. I'm drinking a nice Vegas yard of Guinness right now and would like to share in the fun. Drinks on me. AmericanAir88 (talk) 04:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for John Fresshe

On 17 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Fresshe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1381, during the Peasants' Revolt, John Fresshe—later to be Lord Mayor of London—was widely suspected of encouraging the mob to burn down the Marshalsea Prison? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Fresshe. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Fresshe), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Murder of Deborah Linsley

On 18 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Murder of Deborah Linsley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the murder of Deborah Linsley on a train in 1988 hastened the speed with which British Rail abolished the use of the type of compartment coach in which she died? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of Deborah Linsley. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Murder of Deborah Linsley), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for William Bonville, 1st Baron Bonville

On 21 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Bonville, 1st Baron Bonville, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Wars of the Roses, the son of William Bonville was killed at the Battle of Wakefield in 1460, and Bonville himself was executed a few months later after the Second Battle of St Albans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Bonville, 1st Baron Bonville. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Bonville, 1st Baron Bonville), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club

On 24 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club, formed in 1880, was one of the first openly socialist societies in London? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stratford Dialectical and Radical Club), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Rose Street Club

On 28 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rose Street Club, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Rose Street Club in 19th-century Soho has been described as bridging the political gap between an earlier generation of chartists and a newer trend towards anarchism and socialism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rose Street Club. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rose Street Club), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rose Street Club

The article Rose Street Club you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rose Street Club for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 00:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Since they apparently don't serve tequila in this establishment. Way to go with Rykener! Usernameunique (talk) 17:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Slovak Three

The article Slovak Three you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Slovak Three for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Triple Crown

Congratulations to Serial Number 54129 for achieving the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels. Keep up the great work! Damien Linnane (talk) 12:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Congratulations on getting John/Eleanor Rykener to FA status. John B123 (talk) 09:12, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Thirsty work, John B123 ;) thanks very much! I'm glad you approve, I know it's a speciality of yours, and your appreciation means extra because. Hope you're well! ——SerialNumber54129 09:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Echo the above - important work. ceranthor 20:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK for John FitzWalter, 2nd Baron FitzWalter

On 8 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John FitzWalter, 2nd Baron FitzWalter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1342, John FitzWalter accused men from Colchester of invading and damaging his park at Lexden, and soon after besieged the town for more than two months? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John FitzWalter, 2nd Baron FitzWalter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John FitzWalter, 2nd Baron FitzWalter), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Percy Glading

The article Percy Glading you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Percy Glading for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 18:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Hermes 3000

On 7 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hermes 3000, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actor Tom Hanks has claimed that the Hermes 3000 is the one luxury item he would want to have on a desert island? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hermes 3000. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hermes 3000), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– Ianblair23 (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Becky Sharp

The article Becky Sharp you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Becky Sharp for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 23:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Marc Bloch

On 18 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marc Bloch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marc Bloch (pictured), one of the most influential historians of the 20th century, was also a French Resistance fighter executed by the Gestapo in 1944? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marc Bloch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Marc Bloch), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

AmakuruThe muffin is not subtle 00:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Oxford (1142)

The article Siege of Oxford (1142) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Siege of Oxford (1142) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 23:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Percy Glading

On 22 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Percy Glading, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Percy Glading, British communist and Soviet spy, was described by the head of MI5 as looking "like an overgrown schoolboy" but also "quick-witted and likeable"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Percy Glading. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Percy Glading), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Duke and Duchess of Windsor's tour of Germany, 1937

On 29 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Duke and Duchess of Windsor's tour of Germany, 1937, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Duke and Duchess of Windsor's 1937 tour of Germany (pictured), their alcoholic driver Robert Ley crashed them at speed through a factory gate? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Duke and Duchess of Windsor's tour of Germany, 1937), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vale Royal Abbey

The article Vale Royal Abbey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vale Royal Abbey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

@Peter I. Vardy: Thanks very much—that means a lot, coming from one of its original main editors. I was thinking it might go a step further too...any thoughts? ——SerialNumber54129 20:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
If you have the courage to go for FA, that would be great. I stopped contributing to this article when I ran out of sources and expertise, but it is a most important (and interesting) Cheshire subject, and further improvement would be most welcome. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Oxford (1142)

The article Siege of Oxford (1142) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Oxford (1142) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Joan of Leeds

On 5 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joan of Leeds, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1318 an English nun, Joan of Leeds, faked her own death and fled her priory, leaving a dummy in her place to be buried instead of her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joan of Leeds. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Joan of Leeds), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Keldholme Priory election dispute

On 8 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Keldholme Priory election dispute, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a disputed Priory election in early 14th-century Yorkshire led to nuns being placed under interdict and later being accused of being "daughters of perdition" by their own Archbishop? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Keldholme Priory election dispute. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Keldholme Priory election dispute), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Short English Chronicle

The article A Short English Chronicle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Short English Chronicle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Colin M -- Colin M (talk) 17:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Loveday, 1458

The article Loveday, 1458 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Loveday, 1458 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HaEr48 -- HaEr48 (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For creating this in a single edit. – Ammarpad (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ammarpad:, cheers! Now we just have to await the inevitable AfD per the WP:NOTNEWS brigade :D ——SerialNumber54129 16:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Thinking of it, that's probably Usernameunique's plan  ;) ——SerialNumber54129 16:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

 Military history reviewers' award 
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for January to March 2019 reviews. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

...I suppose it's ironic that the MilHist bot completely nauses up the formatting too 😑 ——SerialNumber54129 10:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ivor Broadis

On 15 April 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ivor Broadis, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Good work never goes unappreciated. Thanks a lot for your contributions in actively combating vandalism on Wikipedia, especially of the type that needs a deeper look. Keep up the good work. DBigXrayᗙ 09:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
@DBigXray: Many thanks! I'm not not sure where I got my deep eye from  ;) but cheers! ——SerialNumber54129 18:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I am just guessing here, did you get it from the all seeing eye. --DBigXrayᗙ 05:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

For education and proselytisation

The Christianity Barnstar
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your efforts in promoting a greater understanding of Christianity as practised during the 14th century. I look forward to many more such articles. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
@Gog the Mild: servus servorum dei, we aim to please. Many thanks, very funny! As it happens, Keldholme Priory election dispute is of a similar kidney, although not quite so interesting; no indecency or fake bodies but some immorality, at least... ——SerialNumber54129 19:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joan of Leeds

The article Joan of Leeds you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joan of Leeds for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 5

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2019). Hello everyone and welcome to the 5th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Until next month, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
  • Wales Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
  • Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
  • Kingdom of Prussia Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Chicago Barkeep49 with six GAs, United States Ceranthor, England Lee Vilenski, and Saskatchewan Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and Denmark MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

University of Bologna

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hey dude, what is your problem? I mean I know you are English and seem to have a stiff butt hole but come on what kind of whiney child reports a user who spews nothing but facts? I have a question what are your educational credentials? Like I said before the statement on University of Bologna are factually incorrect. Even the Italians would whole heartedly disagree with that statement "University of Bologna being the oldest university in the world". I know this because I been there, and have researched this. There is no academic text book that says that it is the oldest in the world. It is not even on the Guinness World of Record as being the oldest. The oldest existing, and continually operating educational institution in the world is the University of Karueein, founded in 859 AD in Fez, Morocco. The University of Bologna, Italy, was founded in 1088 and is the oldest one in Europe. And that is according to Guinness Book of World Records who research and send a qualified agent to investigate these matters before they put these types of statements in their books. As I said before Thomas.W is wrong. He is putting his own bias opinion into this. He says that those institutions were founded as madrasahs but he is factually wrong because they were degree granting institutions for both religious and non religious sciences that is why Guinness Book of Record recognized it as such so did Encyclopedia Britannica. In fact his comment is laughable to any historian or academic because the word madrasah simply means school in Arabic. That is like me saying Harvard Law School is not a university because it has the word school in it. He has a bias Eurocentric view on history and likes to white wash historical facts. I mean would you like an Oxford professor of history to explain this to you? If you do I can provide an e-mail of such a professor if that would help you better grasp what I'm trying to say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afg96 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Unanswered Peer Review Requests

Hello Serial Number 54129, This is an automated notification to remind you about unanswered peer review requests at WP:PR (Don't want these notifications? Click to unsubscribe or change your subscription).

History
Article Date Added
Adele Spitzeder (Peer Review) 2019-04-28
1991-92 Georgian coup d'état (Peer Review) 2019-04-27
Death of Blair Peach (Peer Review) 2019-04-20
William S. Powell (Peer Review) 2019-04-07
Warrenton Junction Raid (Peer Review) 2019-04-06
23rd (Northumbrian) Division (Peer Review) 2019-04-01
New Albion (Peer Review) 2019-03-26
John Curtin (Peer Review) 2019-03-24
Mahathir Mohamad (Peer Review) 2019-03-20
Sarazm (Peer Review) 2019-03-07
Kargil Review Committee (Peer Review) 2018-12-13

You can see a list of all categories at WP:PRWAITING. We hope to see you soon Wikipedia:Peer Review. Happy Reviewing! KadaneBot (talk) 04:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Rama Arbitration Case

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 10, 2019, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Bludgeoning

Hello, please withdraw your accusation of bludgeoning, I have done nothing of the sort. Thanks Polyamorph (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

@Polyamorph: Hi! Yes, I could do that; or, of course, I could seek administative intervention next time you poison an already verging-on-toxic discussion as you have been doing, whether by patronising [4], accusations of prejudice[5], and of "hierarchical"[6]—whatever that means—or just being blatantly wrong [7]. Cheers, ——SerialNumber54129 10:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Right...you have commented on more threads in that discussion than me so are you actually bludgeoning? I was wrong and I withdrew my comment when I misinterpreted Hijiri 88's comments as being prejudiced, which I struck and clarified in my reply, and which they thanked me for. "Hierarchical" is a reference to academic heiriarchy and is not in anyway an accusation. It was also in response to a reply to my own comment. And I f**ked up the rudolf reindeer comment and withdrew it rather promptly. So I'd rather you did actually withdraw your bludgeoning comment, especially since you accept you can do that, if you would be so kind. Polyamorph (talk) 10:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
You have made almost twice as many comments on that page as me, but don't let facts get in the way of self-denial. Take care, ——SerialNumber54129 10:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
What self-denial? I admit I fu**ked up a couple of comments. Polyamorph (talk) 10:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
P.S., for the record, and not that it's going to help as you clearly dislike me, but you have 7 signed comments on that page, versus my 11. That 2/3 not 1/2. Polyamorph (talk) 10:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Why would I dislike you? For what it's worth, up until the point where I called you out, it waz five. But ——SerialNumber54129 10:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Sure and you can say the same for my response to you. I don't know why you would dislike me, but I've asked (hopefully nicely) for you to withdraw a comment and you refuse and even threaten admin action. I haven't meant anything bad, I've just messed up a few comments and misinterpreted a couple of editors, which I've retracted. I should probably step away from wikipedia and have a break, and in fact that's exactly what I'm going to do, and I can tell you for certain that I won't be commenting on that DRV again.Polyamorph (talk) 10:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
@Polyamorph: Following your wikibreak and our discussion here, I don't think there's as much an issue as there could've been; I've struck my remark about bludgeoning, although with a mandatory patronising edit-summary  :) hope you're well! ——SerialNumber54129 16:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Lynne DiSanto

I saw your the post you added and removed at Talk:Lynne DiSanto. I am not involved in any content dispute. Before the edit to restore the content to the pre-edit war version I had never edited the article before. I did not recognize either editor and am not involved with either of them in an admin or editor capacity. I reverted back to the pre-edit war version in the spirit of WP:BRD. I have also explained this to the editor that made the initial Bold edit that was the edit that started the edit war. ~ GB fan 12:33, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

@GB fan: Thanks for this; I meant to restore that post with the correct ping (if you notice, I'd fluffed the reply template!). Yes, well, you may be right; but ultimately you edited through protection to make an editorial intervention, one which is down to the protecting administrator to make: WP:PREFER, Protected pages may not be edited except to make changes that are uncontroversial or for which there is clear consensus—clearly not the case, otherwise the protection would have been unnecessary. I admit I don't see much in WP:BRD allowing editing through protection; indeed, it seems to suggest the opposite (Using BRD in volatile situations is discouraged and BRD fails if...the page is protected). In any case, I don't think you were involved, and I don't have many TPWs, so there's no danger of anyone linking it, judgment-wise, to—previous lapses, shall we say  :) Anyway, I hope you're well! Continuing to respect you! Happy editing, as we say :) Cheers, ——SerialNumber54129 12:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
As far as the protecting admin is concerned there is this. ~ GB fan 12:54, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
V. naughty. I'm surprised that the protecting admin hasn't heard of this, which is mandatory reading for these situations in which everyone is offended and no-one is satisfied  :) Anyway, I'm sure you know your business best. Take care! ——SerialNumber54129 13:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Getting through

In case you didn't get me, I removed the picture because not archiving the thread and keeping a huge DON'T FEED THE TROLL picture is the exact opposite of what DFTT means. Either way, not my boat. --qedk (t 桜 c) 09:17, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

@QEDK: You're certainly right it was and remains none of your business whatsoever and rather arrogant to think you just had to do so: WP:NOBAN, and don't pull that kind of stunt again. ——SerialNumber54129 09:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
There was no stunt, if you don't want other editors making edits on your talk page, you should state that appropriately. It is not my fault you do not appreciate others' helpful changes and also, that you do not state your intentions before being hostile to them. --qedk (t 桜 c) 09:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Brilliant. So I have to put a MASSIVE sign up requesting that anyone who wants to PISS-ARSE AROUND on my talk page should not, in fact, do so?! So it's all MY fault is it? Well, thank you for explaining that, I'll have to polish the old crystal ball a bit harder in order to predict the next character to randomly refactor my page. Take care and happy editing! ——SerialNumber54129 09:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Only because you misconstrued (and still are) my intentions. No one is PISS-ARSE AROUNDing on your talk page, I did the edit that I believed was along your DFTT motive. What is my fault is that I expected you to assume good faith. --qedk (t 桜 c) 09:56, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Oh, you expected to be welcomed? You should've said. ——SerialNumber54129 09:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
I did now. --qedk (t 桜 c) 10:06, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey, no problem: always welcome here, QEDK, you know that. Take care! ——SerialNumber54129 10:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

What do you mean, see GAR? I've just been there!

This section, though? Qwirkle (talk) 18:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Ah, right; replied at GAR. ——SerialNumber54129 10:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

ANI

This is a complete misrepresentation of what I wrote, and will now poison the water for any future consideration of a complaint I am taking very seriously. You might have actually had the courtesy to actually review the dispute before intervening. I have not once contested the sources used. Endymion.12 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

If anyone's interested, I did reply, but on the ANI thread itself, in the spirit of "What starts on ANI, stays on ANI". (1, 2) ——SerialNumber54129 15:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

But was it in mainspace, though?

@Mandruss and Atsme: [8]? After all, the colon differentiates namespaces. It looks like the search engine agrees with me, since User praise:Atsme exists, even if only as a redirect, while https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Atsme&go=Go&ns0=1 does not return it. Honestly, I think we - all those pinged here - have created a new namespace! --GRuban (talk) 17:59, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

I think I will write a Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost article about our momentous discovery. If only it were exactly a month earlier! --GRuban (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Why are you pinging me about this? I'm embarrassed enough that you took my offhand remark and ran with it. That crossed the line in my opinion. Please leave me out of this. ―Mandruss ☎ 18:06, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
But it was your idea! OK, will leave you out. Just wanted to give you your due, but I respect your modesty, and your adherence to the great tradition of contributing a valuable invention to society without patenting it, or otherwise taking credit. Would that all great inventors were so humble. --GRuban (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
It was a rhetorical device never meant to be acted upon. I think that was obvious enough. ―Mandruss ☎ 18:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
I thought you actually moved her UTP as per my remark. If you merely created the "User praise:" page, that's less disruptive but still unnecessarily provocative in my opinion. ―Mandruss ☎ 18:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
But funny? --GRuban (talk) 19:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, WP:ECHO was kept busy there  :) sorry, I was elsewhere. Apologies, @GRuban and Mandruss: if I caused any offence or clumsilly wandered into the middle of something...I don't understand about colonic mainspaces (!!!)—yes I knowm shouldn't be allowed out on my own, blah blah—but I thought it was, precisely because the colon was off centre. I am more confused; should it be moved back? FWIW, I thought it was a shame; v good photo  :) ——SerialNumber54129 18:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
SN54129 - is this my cue to speak...Ha!! I'm reminded of the embarrassment I felt over the mysterious email that was inadvertently sent to Mandruss from my email account. Even-Steven?? Karma?? Whatever. Oh, before I forget GR, that picture of me needs to be thumbnailed before it's printed out as a game target!! Oh, and GR, stay close to your delete key. %Þ Maybe you should have used the one with Steven Tyler to draw attention completely away from me? Surely it would attract more praise and less venom from the handful of detractors that I have inadvertently accumulated over the years - it will all come out in the wash, so clean the filter! Yes, gentlemen - washing machines have filters. Atsme Talk 📧 18:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Yes, gentlemen - washing machines have filters - What's a washing machine? Mr rnddude (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
What you marry, isn't it?  ;) #RageAgainstTheWashingMachine! ——SerialNumber54129 19:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Atsme, I meant you no offense on your talk page and I hope we can continue working together. R2 (bleep) 19:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  • And to celebrate having my watchlist back... I look at the top of it, poke around, and act like a big stick in the mud. Sorry to delete the redirect User praise:Atsme, but it's definitely in the mainspace. There is no "user praise" namespace (perhaps there should be?), and Mediawiki isn't smart enough to know you (GRuban) were being funny. It just sees a page in the mainspace with a colon in it, like any other article with a colon in it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:57, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Flo!! My apologies if the image frightened you. It was not my intention - blame GR. As a thumbnail, it looks just fine because I can't see much of anything that small, and figured no one else could...except maybe eagle-eyes. Notice no wikilink for eagle-eyes because none of the editors I know fit that description. R2 - absolutely...I don't hold grudges - my memory won't allow it. Remember, preconceived notions are not your ally, and most editors respond far more favorably to collegial discussion - and yes, I readily accept constructive criticism despite my new praise page. It's more a matter of what one prefers. I've never known anyone who grew tired of compliments. As for washing machine filters...dude!! ^_^. Atsme Talk 📧 20:16, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Third opinion requested

Am I making much/any sense over this t/p thread. Do you agree with my interpretation of BLP? ∯WBGconverse 16:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

User talk:174.102.161.185

Fun with homonyms re: this edit summary Atsme Talk 📧 11:38, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi, not sure what you were trying to do on this page, and your edit summary didn't make any sense. I guess it was a mistake and have reverted. Cheers — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:43, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Serial Number 54129. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 09:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

GABgab 09:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Doppleganger

Serial Number 54192 (talk · contribs) has been recently discovered. I redirected the page to you. If this is not you the name will likely be blocked, but so far no edits were made from this name. TheEditster (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

@TheEditster: Thanks for that; yes, it's more likely than not this chap—an LTA, or at least a sock. You know, I see you mean well, and your enthusiasm is really appreciated, but you might want to slow down at WP:UAA...? I mean, you just reported an admin for a username violation. Read up on the username policy and instructions, and you'll get a decent grasp of what's going on. I hope you are well, and thanks for the message all the same! ——SerialNumber54129 18:31, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Actually, I didn't list that person for that reason. I listed it because I noticed it was impossible to create a username with only numbers. I respect that person's editing, but if you try to create a numerical name (not the same numbers) you'll get an error message. TheEditster (talk) 19:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
One day soon we're all going to have to get together at ANI for the quickening and fight it out... ;) GirthSummit (blether) 18:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
I like it better when we talk. Being in an edit war is simply no fun. If the site is all about reaching consensus then I'm all for it. If something I do is reverted, I'll go to the talkpage and try to establish consensus over there. TheEditster (talk) 19:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, that wasn't a reference about you TheEditster - I was just making another Highlander reference. I didn't think the horse was dead enough, thought I'd flog it a bit more. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 19:51, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Previous listing as a party

My apologies for the above section stating that you are a party. You are not, I made a mistake with the template. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm holding Levivich personally responsible. ——SerialNumber54129 20:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I was this --> <-- close to finally getting SN brought to Arbcom... Leviv ich 20:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Oops!

Sorry, Serial Number 54129! I didn't mean to overwrite your closure of that username section in ANI. Please accept my apologies for doing so. If you'd rather have your closure published, feel free to revert mine and restore yours. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:36, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

No problem at all, Oshwah, yours is far more nuanced (as usual). Thanks for the note though—I hadn't even noticed  :) ——SerialNumber54129 09:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Cool deal; I appreciate the response and the kind words. :-) Letting you know what happened and apologizing for the accidental mix-up was the right thing to do. Hence, I did so. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Indeed, I should so more often  :) take care! ——SerialNumber54129 09:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

I missed all the fun!

Too bad, would have been a great opportunity to block myself! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:39, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

@78.26: Yes, you would only be unblocked on condition you changed your username...to something more modern, perhpas, like User:8-track :D ha! ——SerialNumber54129 18:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
True story: when I was quite young my parents told me I had a one-track mind when it came to my activity of choice, listening to music. I replied that no, I had an 8-track mind. Unfortunately it rather turns out I have an untracked mind.... 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Can't have you missing any fun

So here it is 78.26...You've been blocked!!

Stackable WTF blocks
 You are the recipient of a WTF Block
Remember how much fun you had playing with blocks as a kid? Now that you're an mature adult, you can collect blocks with adult letters, and they're not only stackable, they're collectable.

Disclaimer: Intended as humor. Pure pun-ishment. [10]

Courtesy of Atsme Talk 📧 02:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:No personal attacks

Please refrain from ad hominem arguments. Nemo 20:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Good faith, i.e. intentions, have nothing to do with my message, which is about content of what you wrote. Nemo 21:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm sure you have plenty to bring to the encyclopaedia; please do so. Instead of fucking about. ——SerialNumber54129 21:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Genesis

I saw them with Gabriel. Couldn’t tell if he was singing, or the annoying drummer most of the time. Roxy, the dog. wooF 15:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

In your face, Collins! :D ——SerialNumber54129 09:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

AN3

Re: your strange quotebox up the page: I'm not concerned with whether other administrators' feelings are hurt - everybody needs to stop giving VxFC oxygen. Administrators and other editors can be forgiven for not spotting a sock they're not familiar with, but given that VxFC perennially tries to stir up exactly what was happening at AN3, let's not gratify him. Acroterion (talk) 14:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Acroterion: I totally agree, and I respect that you've replied here, many thanks for doing so. For a start, the whole thing was blown slightly out of proportion, I agree; Nyttend seemed to think arbcom was around the corner, and I think we've all had enough of that for the time being. But I must emphasise that if one is going to use words such as "harass", one should ensure that one has one's evidence to hand. Allegations without diffs are aspersions, and—while I'm the first (and often am) to squash VxfC (diff, diff, diff, diff, diff)—we can't avoid having difficult discussions just because they may / will hijack them for their own ends. Of course, they will; it's what they do. But if we closed a conversation every time an LTA involved themselves in our business, our business would soon grind to a halt. Anyway, thanks for looking in, and have a good Sunday. ——SerialNumber54129 14:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, it's something that VxFC is really good at inciting. RBI is the only way to go with this sort of thing. Acroterion (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

I'd certanly agree their assistance was unrequired, although I think that the original "incitement"—as it were—is probably more the responsibility of Materialscientist (edit-warring and rollbacking) and Nyttend (accusations of harassment); without any of that, there would have been nothing to troll. Still, I'm sure it won't happen again.

On a lighter note, Winged Blades of Godric, I see you were unjustly accused of participation of our little ANEW soirée. I imagine that's a result of User:Hell in a Bucket misreading the board (you have a thread somewhat farther down, I see, but of course it's unrelated). It's a shame, but there seems to have been a regular litany of errors today...refactoring this page, misunderstandstanding WP:POLEMIC, with their entire claim ("a useful excercise" notwithstanding) being...summarilly rejected. I say nothing of the repeated ([11], [12]) need to apologize to all and sundry.

Still; all's well that end's well. Now, having resolved the matter at the root of the affaire quotebox, I can remove it. I suppose it's an object lesson in how much more profitable discussion is to refactoring. I imagine such an approach in the first place woould have resulted in much fewer words and time expended and wasted for the same result. C'est la vie. </sermon> ——SerialNumber54129 17:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

All of these analyses and suggestions for atonement just work against denial of recognition. That said, a little explanation goes a long way to unconfuse editors who aren't familiar with this particular troll, whose specialty is the exploitation of superficial plausibility to get everybody arguing with each other. They've been doing this for years. Acroterion (talk) 02:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
171 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Ankh-Morpork City Watch (talk) Add sources
67 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Nasser al-Bahri (talk) Add sources
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tournaisis (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Henry Clifford, 1st Earl of Cumberland (talk) Add sources
192 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmorland (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C James Klugmann (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B History of the English fiscal system (talk) Cleanup
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Militant activity of Osama bin Laden (talk) Cleanup
624 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Pakistan Armed Forces (talk) Cleanup
312 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Foreign relations of North Korea (talk) Expand
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Over, Cheshire (talk) Expand
51 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Al-Mourabitoun (militant group) (talk) Expand
6,717 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B North Korea (talk) Unencyclopaedic
43 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Mark Johnson (North Carolina politician) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Abdel Bari Atwan (talk) Unencyclopaedic
242 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B School holiday (talk) Merge
386 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA State-sponsored terrorism (talk) Merge
721 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Racial policy of Nazi Germany (talk) Merge
175 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Debriefing (talk) Wikify
39 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bathurst War (talk) Wikify
90 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Invergordon Mutiny (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Maria Nikolaeva (talk) Orphan
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lina Kahafizadeh (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Friedrich Keutgen (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Baron Coleville (talk) Stub
52 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Free Joseon (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Stockerston (talk) Stub
49 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Adrian Hong (talk) Stub
42 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mahajani (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Bernard Bachrach (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

DS notices

I just saw your comment at AE that DS notices don't show up on mobile phones? I wonder if I should add that bit of info to my ARCA request? Atsme Talk 📧 04:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@Atsme: sorry for the belated eply, but I'd say so, defintely; admins are meant to take that possibility into account (which is written down somewhre, but can't remember where at the mo), although I'm sure it's observed more in the breach than the observance, as they say  :) take care! ——SerialNumber54129 15:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Will you add that info to your comment there? It will probably carry more weight than mine which has gotten to the point of tl;dr. Atsme Talk 📧 16:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Opinions on an article

How's Sentinelese for a GA? Will be interested in hearing your opinions:-) ∯WBGconverse 16:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) An immediate thing that jumps out is The Sentinelese … may be shorter in stature than average humans. During a 2014 circumnavigation of their island, researchers put their height between 5 ft 3 in (1.60 m) and 5 ft 5 in (1.65 m)—this range is actually taller than the average height of Indians (who are statistically one of the shortest populations in the world). The statement is obviously factually correct in that they're below the mean for the planet, but this height range isn't at all atypical for South Asia. ‑ Iridescent 16:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks; will copy-edit that line. ∯WBGconverse 08:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
I'd try to get rid of the stub paragraphs as well. Also, is it just me or does this article have very few sources from India despite the island being considered Indian territory? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, will be merging some of the paragraphs. Agree that some are too short.
Since 1990s, all contact expeditions have been stopped except for some routine circumnavigations and frankly, there's nothing much to write about. The island, now-a-days, make it to the headlines only in stray cases of illegal intrusions (and subsequent death) like Chau, Raj-Tiwari et al.
Aprior to that, (~1960-1990) there used to be passive-aggressive contact missions (and some thrill-vacations) every year or so, but it was largely the same story. The detailed records of ANSI, log-diaries of the teams et al contain precious little, apart from what's already in the article. I don't believe that any newspaper would have been interested to publish such mundane stuff given that even the incident of first (and only) contact was not reported except in a local newspaper. Even in that span, it was only once/twice that the teams managed to enter the island and record some observations about their lifestyle.
If we go further back by about a century, when British officers (Portman, Temple et al) toured the island and captured them often, I expect to locate coverage across regional dailies (at a minimum) but accessing such old newspapers in India is a tediously difficult job. But FWIW, they frequently went about invading random islands, capturing natives, trying to utilize them for their own purposes and did a variety of allied stuff. So, it might not have been rare enough, to report. I don't have a concrete idea and it's a territory of guess-works. So far, no scholar (incl. Pandya who is a famed academic in these domains) has mentioned any such source, in their bibliography.
I will still note that 2 of the most-used sources over the article are by two highly reputed Indian authors in the field (T.N. Pandit and V. Pandya).∯WBGconverse 08:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Unanswered Peer Review Requests

Hello Serial Number 54129, This is an automated notification to remind you about unanswered peer review requests at WP:PR (Don't want these notifications? Click to unsubscribe or change your subscription).

History
Article Date Added
Marcus Aurelius (Peer Review) 2019-05-26
Camp Meriwether (Oregon) (Peer Review) 2019-05-13
Supermarine Spitfire (Peer Review) 2019-05-09
Adele Spitzeder (Peer Review) 2019-04-28
1991-92 Georgian coup d'état (Peer Review) 2019-04-27
William S. Powell (Peer Review) 2019-04-07
Warrenton Junction Raid (Peer Review) 2019-04-06
23rd (Northumbrian) Division (Peer Review) 2019-04-01
John Curtin (Peer Review) 2019-03-24
Kargil Review Committee (Peer Review) 2018-12-13

You can see a list of all categories at WP:PRWAITING. We hope to see you soon Wikipedia:Peer Review. Happy Reviewing! KadaneBot (talk) 04:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 6

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (May 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 6th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Enjoy your summer, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Do you want to nominate "Humphrey Stafford, 1st Duke of Buckingham" for July 10th's TFA?

Hello 54129! I was just messaging you since you were one of the primary editors and FA nominators of "Humphrey Stafford, 1st Duke of Buckingham". I was wondering if you'd want to nominate this page of yours for TFA for 10 July 2019, as you suggested at WP:TFARP. Humphrey Stafford, 1st Duke of Buckingham is a great featured article, and it would be a cool TFA on July 10 (the anniversary of the subject's death) - would you want formally nominate that page at WP:TFA/R? Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Oops, accidentally asked you about a different page. Sorry, meant "Humphrey Stafford, 1st Duke of Buckingham" (and not "1989 Tour de France" - wrong user). Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the poke, Paintspot—have done so! Cheers, ——SerialNumber54129 18:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your message must've brought plenty of good luck!

The Special Barnstar
You posted this message on 211.27.115.246's talk page (the date, time and your username I've not included as they're not needed). I used to own that IP.:

'I saw your post on AnnaFrodesiak's talk page; anything I can help with? What particular vandalism did you have in mind?' Looks like the message brought me good luck because I, on this IP, ended up reverting a decent amount of bad stuff/reporting accounts whose usernames don't meet the policy, most of which feels to me like was done in the past 1/2 a week but have been doing almost nothing else for a month minus the aforementioned period of time. 211.26.200.179 (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Whilst you're reading this, shall I file an AN3 complaint for what's been happening on the crepe article (I found out via AIV haha)*haha because via and AIV are the reverse of each other (ignoring capitalization) - no offense.211.26.200.179 (talk) 11:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Well, it's been protected now, so there's no need; but I'm rather surprised that User:Freddyf638 hasn't been blocked for blatant vandalism. In any case, the only thing that should "go on the crepe article" is sugar and lemon. Possibly Nutella. Or a chicken and mushroom creamy thing. Mmmm.
Thanks for the barnstar btw, anon; I draw your attention to WP:ACCOUNT, in case you feel like it; no pressure. ——SerialNumber54129 11:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Update: Ah, Edgar181 on the case. Cheers! ——SerialNumber54129 12:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
That post about what should be on a crepe would be interesting to Anna, if she ever comes back to Wikipedia. Did you see my joke about via and AIV?211.26.200.179 (talk) 12:12, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Orpheus in the Underworld

Good evening! I'm grateful for your comments at the FAC, and would be glad to learn there if my replies are satisfactory, and whether you wish to support, oppose or abstain in re FA status. Tim riley talk 19:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about that Tim riley, I was on a three-week haitus; glad you got out of the underworld OK though. ——SerialNumber54129 17:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll#Shut this down?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll#Shut this down?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

In vain

[13] —PaleoNeonate – 10:59, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

@PaleoNeonate: Nice one! I think he'd approve  ;) ——SerialNumber54129 20:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
48 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start San Tropez (song) (talk) Add sources
21 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Robert de Ferrers, 6th Earl of Derby (talk) Add sources
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ralph Neville, 1st Baron Neville (talk) Add sources
40 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Gonzalo (The Tempest) (talk) Add sources
49 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Brighella (talk) Add sources
679 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Horlicks (talk) Add sources
267 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Post–World War II legality of Nazi flags (talk) Cleanup
281 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Political career of Arnold Schwarzenegger (talk) Cleanup
3,697 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Frank Hamer (talk) Cleanup
506 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA The Great Replacement (talk) Expand
42 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Iyad Ag Ghaly (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Denis Sinor (talk) Expand
96 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Devanagari transliteration (talk) Unencyclopaedic
425 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B North Korean defectors (talk) Unencyclopaedic
51 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Qatar Charity (talk) Unencyclopaedic
199 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Millfield (talk) Merge
104 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Buick Rainier (talk) Merge
45 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Rail transport in Hong Kong (talk) Merge
126 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C The Terminator: Future Shock (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Postage stamps and postal history of Mozambique (talk) Wikify
133 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Odia script (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Sieglinde Hartmann (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Hazhir Rahmandad (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Heather Lewandowski (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Greenfield Priory (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Millom Castle (talk) Stub
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Symphony No. 4 (Glass) (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Legbourne Priory (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Esholt Priory (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Rusper Priory (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

JSTOR Q

Hey, SN, do you have access to these? [14], [15]. My JSTOR lite does not... Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Sent you Drmies ——SerialNumber54129 12:35, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Richard Neville, 5th Earl of Salisbury & wife.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Richard Neville, 5th Earl of Salisbury & wife.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Untranscluded DYK nominations from April

Serial Number 54129, it looks like you have two DYK nominations from April where you created the nomination pages but never transcluded them onto the Nominations page, so no one ever saw them (and therefore they were never reviewed). The nomination pages appear to have been created within the requisite seven days.

If you would like them to be reviewed, please transclude them under their proper dates. The nominations are:

Please give this your earliest attention. Best of luck with them both. If you decide you do not wish to proceed with either or both of the nominations, let me know and I will arrange to have the nomination pages deleted. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Many thanks for this, they dropped off the radar somehow. Wot day should they go in, since April is long gone? ——SerialNumber54129 14:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Serial Number 54129, put the one in under March 30, and the other under March 31, and add a note to each explaining that while they were nominated in time, you forgot to transclude them. This isn't the first time that such nominations have been forgotten and then added when they were found. I'll be happy to post a little note to say that I encouraged you to transclude them when I discovered that they'd been overlooked. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serial_Number_54129/Archive_20&oldid=1143297610"