User talk:Obi2canibe/archive32
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Obi2canibe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Obi2canibe. Thank you for your work on Coalition for the Republic. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
ARBIPA topic alert
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Vile personal attacks
Not only you have personally attacked me and falsified my editing history,[1] you are also casting WP:ASPERSIONS by targeting editors by speculating their nationalities and calling them meatpuppets without any evidence.
You should remove that part from your comment on the AfD on Tamil genocide or you will end up at WP:ANI. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Block
Indian friends, etc.), will result in sanctions of especial severity, up to and including an indefinite suspension from editing. Below is an alert concerning this particular contentious topic, so please ensure you review it closely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 01:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Obi2canibe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do have evidence of the meatpuppetery at the AfD but haven't been given a chance to present it before being blocked.
I have edited hundreds of articles related to Sri Lankan Tamils over the last 15 years. I have never known so many accounts of Indian origin to interact with a Sri Lankan Tamil article as is happening in this AfD. Currently, seven accounts of Indian origin have participated in the AfD:
- Ratnahastin (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
- CharlesWain (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
- Orientls (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
- Lorstaking (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
- Pravega (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
- Raymond3023 (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
- Azuredivay (talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log)
All seven are voting to delete the article and are using the same non-policy based reasoning for deleting the article: Orientls ("no such genocide against the Tamils"); Lorstaking ("No Tamil genocide ever happened"); Pravega ("No genocide against the Tamils"); Ratnahastin ("Nobody recognizes any "Tamil Genocide""); Azuredivay ("nobody recognises this non-existing "genocide"").
Prior to taking part in the AfD, the seven accounts have had no interaction with the article up for deletion and little or no interaction any other Sri Lankan Tamil related article. The Tamil genocide does not relate to India - the genocide is alleged to have been perpetrated by Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka against Tamils from Sri Lanka. It should not be of such great interest to so many Indian origin accounts.
A look at the interaction of the accounts shows that they edit similar articles:
- Ratnahastin and CharlesWain
- Ratnahastin and Orientls
- Ratnahastin and Lorstaking
- Ratnahastin and Pravega
- Ratnahastin and Raymond3023
- Ratnahastin and Azuredivay
I have experience of spotting signs of meatpuppetery and sockpuppetery and have reported a number accounts with evidence to WP:SPI. Based on the above evidence I am convinced that there is off-wiki co-ordination by the accounts in relation to the AfD.
In relation to me categorising the accounts as "Indian" at the AfD, it was not meant to be an insult or a personal attack or xenophobic but merely to point the connection between the accounts for the reasons set out above. If there had been any other commonalities between the accounts I would have pointed that out too. Similarly, the term "friends" was meant to signify the off-wiki connection between the accounts, nothing else. I am not Indian/Pakistani/Afghan. I have never edited topics coming under the jurisdiction of WP:CT/IPA. I have no issue with Indian editors or Indian people in general.
I am not someone who castes aspersions as claimed by the account that reported me to ANI. My record speaks for itself. My comment on the AfD was given in good faith - based on my experience and knowledge I genuinely believe there is meatpuppetery involved in the highly unusual activity at the AfD by Indian origin accounts. Thank you. Obi2canibe (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please read WP:NOTTHEM. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to Sri Lanka, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. El_C 01:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you
@Pharaoh of the Wizards:, @Lustead: and others: Thank you for all your support at ANI but I would like to move on therefore could you please cease further discussion at ANI, I do not want others getting blocked trying to defend me. I will resume editing once my block expires next week. Thanks. Obi2canibe (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Belgium political party shading templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Not sure I agree with the statement that it was a "much smaller constituency". It had 14 seats in 1985 and still 12 by 1995, while the current constituency has 15. Can I suggest the unmerge is undone? Cheers, Number 57 21:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Number 57:Hi, sorry for late response. The area of the constituency increased by 380% from 797 km2 to 3,857 km2. This map shows Liège arrondissement (old constituency) within Liège province (new constituency). The electorate increased by 80% from 400,000 to 725,000. To me this says these are different constituencies and should have separate articles. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tamil publishers (people)
A tag has been placed on Category:Tamil publishers (people) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for R. Sampanthan
On 3 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article R. Sampanthan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Category:2018 in Tamil Nadu
Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 11#Category:2018 in Tamil Nadu. – Fayenatic London 12:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Austria political party shading templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Marshal of the Sri Lanka Air Force
@Obi2canibe:, Please see the page Marshal of the Sri Lanka Air Force, it has been suggested to merge the article to Roshan Goonetileke, you do something. Hamwal (talk) 21:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Category:Tamil priests has been nominated for renaming
Category:Tamil priests has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Years of the 21st century in Tamil Nadu indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Years in Tamil Nadu
A tag has been placed on Category:Years in Tamil Nadu indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Category:People from Kalmunai has been nominated for merging
Category:People from Kalmunai has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Russian on Latvian articles
I find it inappropriate that you added Russian names on articles about Latvia. While an argument can be made for historical articles (as Russian was the lingua franca throughout most of Latvian history and still is a major language) to do it for modern articles is absurd. Especially since 2022. Calling the fact that in modern day Latvia Russian holds no official status as "irrelevant" is absurd and I hope you will realize this. --OskarsC (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @OskarsC: Wikipedia guidelines (WP:NCPLACE#Alternative names) requires other names of places to be mentioned in articles, especially when used significantly. Russian is the mother language of more than one third of Latvians. The fact that it has no official recognition has no relevance. I am aware Latvian nationalists have systematically removed Russian names from articles for Latvian places but I do not intend to allow this to happen to the constituency articles.--Obi2canibe (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. I see... I was hoping you were just uninformed but you are aware of what you are doing. For your information I hate nationalism. Especially Russian nationalism. Let's put Chinese now on every article because it's a popular language in the world. Alright, I'm done. --OskarsC (talk) 20:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @OskarsC: Immature response. Just like trying to correct one wrong (annexation and colonisation) with another wrong (suppressing the culture of hundreds of thousands of people and depriving them of their basic human rights).--Obi2canibe (talk) 12:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Telling your colonizer to stop acting like they own the place is "suppressing their culture and depriving them of their basic human rights". Sure thing buddy. And as for my "immaturity" - I was just suggesting adding "popular languages" to unrelated articles. If you find that immature, I have to say - I completely agree with you! --OskarsC (talk) 13:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Sri Lanka, Tokyo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:ORG. Only primary sources used.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tamil National Alliance Logo 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tamil National Alliance Logo 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 7 § Local politicians by nationality
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 7 § Local politicians by nationality on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH talk! 01:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Puigdemont
I’d like to bring to your attention that my recent edits to the article were made to address the previous concerns. I kindly request that you refrain from undoing my version without first taking the time to review the changes. I believe this will ensure we maintain a constructive dialogue. Thank you for your understanding! 194.38.172.194 (talk) 07:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Uusimaa (electoral district 2 in Finland)
Hi, I provided a Finnish language source from Yle to the talk page concerning "Uusimaa" as being the Finnish name of the district. Check the Wiktionary page for "Uusimaa" for more information. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Uusimaa Loser12user (talk) 08:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Biographies of women
Hi there, Obi2canibe. I see that recently you have created several biographies of women. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might like to join WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Obi2canibe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |