Jump to content

User talk:Gonzo fan2007/Archive 2019

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

DYK for Lee Joannes

[edit]

On 7 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lee Joannes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1933 Green Bay Packers president Lee Joannes personally loaned the organization $6,000 to keep it in operation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lee Joannes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lee Joannes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ianblair23 (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

[edit]

Hi, Gonzo fan2007. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Green Bay Packers retired numbers – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 4. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks Giants2008. The blurb looks great to me. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for noticing that, I appreciate. Mahveotm (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blake Martinez

[edit]

Hey Gonzo, Hope all is well with you. Rough season for us this year. Forgive my stalking, but I happened to see you had Blake Martinez in your sandbox. Was wondering if you'd be interested in doing a once over it with me to see if we can get it up to GA? I remember years ago getting it to DYK, but I don't know how much of the article has changed since then. --Church Talk 21:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Church! Great to see you back. I would be happy to help with Blake Martinez, but I'm probably going to be light on editing for a little while. I have a few things going on irl that I have to focus on. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:21, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I've also taken the liberty of beginning the work on Emil Fischer in your Sandbox. He's such an important part of the history of the Packers, should be a good DYK candidate. --Church Talk 20:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Church, thanks for your interest in Emil Fischer (American football executive). Although I appreciate any help, I do have a certain system when it comes to writing an article from scratch. I also don't move an article to namespace until I think it is close to WP:GA status. Since it is in my userspace, I would prefer to draft it using my general process, which is:
Article Template (infobox, categories, sections, pic) --> Fully formatted references (usually from Newspapers.com) --> Write Lead --> Write each section individually --> Add citations to each section --> Copyedit & revise as needed
Just be aware that I probably will rewrite some of or all of what you add. For me I find it easier to write from scratch. I just don't want you to waste too much time on it. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Gonzo, I appreciate you giving me the heads up, and I apologize if I overstepped. I will go ahead and back off of it now, but if you need any help I'll be here. Admittedly, I'm struggling right now to find a Packer's article that interests me to work on, but I'll keep plugging. Thanks for all of your work.--Church Talk 03:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Church, no apology needed. I personally have always found it easier to write about people who have already died, since it is pretty easy to wrap up the article and it doesn't need much work after it is complete. Curly Lambeau, Bob Mann (American football), and Miracle in Motown are all articles that have good bases to them and probably won't require a ton of work to bring to WP:GA status. I would be up for helping you with Curly Lambeau, as he is on my to-do list for the near-term. Another thought would be to work on the remaining Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame redlinks: Jerry Atkinson (American football), William Brault, Wilner Burke, Art Daley, Frank Jonet, Al Treml, and F. N. Trowbridge, Sr.. Titletown District is another good opportunity. I created it a while ago but never got around to completing it (one of my lessons for why I don't move to mainspace until an article is almost finished). Hope these help! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. I'll give Curly a read over when work slows down in a bit and see if I can start a to-do list. Appreciate all your time and help as always. --Church Talk 18:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA request

[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you reviewed the good article nomination of Bol Bol a few months ago. I was hoping that you would consider reviewing another college basketball player article, Zion Williamson, for GA consideration. The review page can be found at the top of its talk page. Let me know if you are interested. Wisestork (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wisestork. Although I appreciate the request, I have some stuff irl that I am working on and don't have much time for editing right now outside of maintaining my own projects.
Also, just a little bit of a recommendation: people are more willing to review articles from people who have reviewed other articles. So I would recommend as your article sits in the queue that you review a few articles in the Sports & Rec category. That way your article gets higher on the list and people notice that you are actively helping cut down the backlog.
Also, note that a lot of articles can sit at WP:GAN for quite a while. As an example, I nominated Andrew B. Turnbull 3 months ago. So I would just hedge your expectations of a quick review, although who knows, you can always get lucky! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added EnterpriseyJJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5Jenks24GraftR. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.


Hi, this is to let you know that the above article will appear as Today's Featured Article on March 14, 2019. The blurb to be used can be found here. You are free to edit the blurb, and may want to watchlist that page, as well as WP:ERRORS in case there are queries about it on the day it runs, as well as the previous day. If you have questions or concerns, feel free to post on my talk. Thanks for building quality content!--Wehwalt (talk) 15:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Russ Bogda

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Russ Bogda at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Russ Bogda

[edit]

On 2 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Russ Bogda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Green Bay Packers president Russ Bogda advocated for a public referendum in the 1950s to finance the construction of Lambeau Field? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Russ Bogda. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Russ Bogda), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous


Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Packers sweep

[edit]

I can tell you did a lot of work on the Packers sweep. Congratulations on it being a featured article! Red Director (talk) 03:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Red Director. My first FA, TFA, and WP:FOUR after 12 years of editing haha! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

[edit]
The Fuzzy Thurston Award
Great work on getting Packers sweep up to TFA status! Pretty cool logging in and seeing it on the main page. All the best ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks el cid, el campeador!! Yeah, it was an enjoyable article to write and a quirky topic! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the FA!

[edit]
I saw you FA this morning and it was an interesting read, congratulations! Adog (TalkCont) 21:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Adog! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration sought

[edit]

Content I have contributed has been thrice removed by another editor. Please contact me & advise how I proceed to request arbitration. Entry point for the process is not available on the pertinent guidepages. Thank you.Dogru144 (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC) -Correction-has been removed five times.Dogru144 (talk) 00:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you make content doesn't mean anyone is under obligation to keep it on those pages, especially if it's deemed that it shouldn't be there. You scold me (incorrectly) for not engaging on the talk page, but when I ask you to, you give up on engaging and instead immediately seek a third party without giving discussion a chance. This feels incredibly underhanded--Fradio71 (talk) 00:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what you are talking about and I have absolutely no interest in engaging with this. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Riccitelli GA review

[edit]

Hi there,

I've read your comments and have changed everything to the best of my capabilities.

However, In regards to the following points below, I have listed some explanations:

  • Francis Douglas Memorial College first XV - A first XV is the top rugby union team in a secondary school in New Zealand. Francis Douglas Memorial College first XV, is the name of the team Riccitelli represented.
  • Union - Union is another name for a team. For example; the union in Taranaki Rugby Football Union is used in the same context as club in Liverpool Football Club.
  • South Africa - I think adding South Africa after Durban isn't necessary as in the infobox it already clarifies his nationality.

Thank you, please let me know if there is anything else I may need to change. Kidsoljah (talk) 02:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kidsoljah, I renominated the article for you and will review in a few days. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

[edit]

Green Bay Packers

Thank you for quality articles such as Packers sweep, George Whitney Calhoun and Green Bay Packers Foundation, for lists such as List of Green Bay Packers first-round draft picks, for service from 2007, - repeating (11 May 2009): you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gerda Arendt, much appreciated! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I currently have another baseball related GA nom under review which caused me to start a conversation at WT:BASEBALL#Baseball GAs around prose in baseball related GAs. You might be interested in that discussion in light of taking on the Goldschmidt review. Muboshgu, who nominated this one, and I have had some extended and I think productive conversation about the topic. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Barkeep49 for pointing out the discussion. I am very familiar with Goldschmidt's career and have a few areas where I think the article could be expanded/improved during the GA review. Feel free to provide any input as you see fit. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

Your GA nomination of Andrew B. Turnbull

[edit]

The article Andrew B. Turnbull you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andrew B. Turnbull for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jack Vainisi

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jack Vainisi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:41, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jack Vainisi

[edit]

The article Jack Vainisi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jack Vainisi for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 05:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of W. Webber Kelly

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article W. Webber Kelly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of W. Webber Kelly

[edit]

The article W. Webber Kelly you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:W. Webber Kelly for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 06:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jack Vainisi

[edit]

The article Jack Vainisi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jack Vainisi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 22:22, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of W. Webber Kelly

[edit]

The article W. Webber Kelly you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:W. Webber Kelly for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lee Joannes

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lee Joannes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lee Joannes

[edit]

The article Lee Joannes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lee Joannes for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lee Joannes

[edit]

The article Lee Joannes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lee Joannes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 21:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

[edit]
Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:44, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

[edit]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous


Your GA nomination of Russ Bogda

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Russ Bogda you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Russ Bogda

[edit]

The article Russ Bogda you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Russ Bogda for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:41, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

[edit]
Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Russ Bogda

[edit]

The article Russ Bogda you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Russ Bogda for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

removed AndonicConsumed CrustaceanEnigmamanEuryalusEWS23HereToHelpNv8200paPeripitusStringTheory11Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous


Unreliable source question

[edit]

Hi there, Gonzo, and thanks for the copy-editing on the East/West rivalry article. I'm a bit confused as to why you tagged my cite of the Congressional Record as an unreliable source. I was citing it to back up the assertion that Green commemorated the 100th game on the floor of Congress, not as evidence of the 100th game itself. Please advise what may be a better source in this situation, and please ping me with a response. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 23:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Etzedek24, you are right, my bad. I must have read it wrong. I removed it! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:44, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytesAd OrientemAnsh666BeeblebroxBoing! said ZebedeeBU Rob13Dennis BrownDeorDoRDFloquenbeam1Flyguy649Fram2GadfiumGB fanJonathunderKusmaLectonarMoinkMSGJNickOd MishehuRamaSpartazSyrthissTheDJWJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous



Your GA nomination of Gerald Francis Clifford

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gerald Francis Clifford you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gerald Francis Clifford

[edit]

The article Gerald Francis Clifford you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gerald Francis Clifford for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gerald Francis Clifford

[edit]

The article Gerald Francis Clifford you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gerald Francis Clifford for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Gerald Francis Clifford

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Gerald Francis Clifford at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 08:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC) CeeGee 08:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, any chance you can unprotect this page? I'd like to tag it for deletion since there are no quality assessments for North Korea articles. Regards. PC78 (talk) 23:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PC78, we usually don't delete these type of pages, as they show a historic record of changes. Is there a particular reason you think it needs to be deleted and can't just be left as is? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cleanup of Category:North Korea-related articles by quality which is otherwise empty. I would expect this to fall under WP:G6 or WP:G8, I don't see that it has any genuine historical value. At the very least, I'd be grateful if you could remove the category from that page. Are these assessment logs no longer maintained anyway? PC78 (talk) 09:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the category. These logs for all WikiProjects broke last year, and some users are working on updating the bot to fix this. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:07, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore image

[edit]

Please restore the image of the Bull Run Commemoration stamp First Bull Run 2011 U.S. stamp.jpg which replicates an out-of-copyright battlefield painting. The question was previously litigated on a WP copyright oversight community page, and the result is WP permission for the page. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 17:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link to the discussion and I would be glad to assist with the request. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 01:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for entertaining the possibility of a “discussion”.
[deleted offensive posting TheVirginiaHistorian (talk)]
Thank you for your considerate attention. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 08:46, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yikes TheVirginiaHistorian, that it quite the rude response to a basic question. You said in your original post to my talk page "The question was previously litigated on a WP copyright oversight community page, and the result is WP permission for the page." I reply in under a day requesting a link to the discussion you referenced so I can better understand what you are talking about. You reply a week later, accuse me of being racist, OWNING pages, and only understanding Green Bay Packers articles!?!? All I did was request a link to the discussion you are referencing and said "I would be glad to assist with the request." I will no longer assist you with this request. The deletion review is the proper venue for this type of discussion and your blatantly rude tone and words are unacceptable on my talk page, especially for a user who has been editing as long as you have. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reference to the deletion review. I've been informed that no discussion is required at an administrator's "speedy deletion" initiative. I really appreciate the bots and administrators who police the many wp:vandal attacks on my authored pages. I guess that's the only way things can get done in an expeditious way. Sorry I took the deletion as a personal attack, and I inappropriately replied in kind. Thanks for all you do. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:First Bull Run 2011 U.S. stamp.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Emil Fischer (American football executive) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Emil Fischer (American football executive) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Emil Fischer (American football executive) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Emil Fischer (American football executive) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Emil Fischer (American football executive) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

[edit]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

Also, the markup

<font color="#2A2722;">(talk)</font> : (talk)

for me, anyway, is displaying differently (greener than) the usual

<font color="#2A2722">(talk)</font> : (talk)

and actually displays the same as

<font color="#2A7200">(talk)</font> : (talk)

You are encouraged to change

<span style="white-space:nowrap; font-family: Harlow Solid Italic;">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<span style="font-size: small; color: teal;"> « Gonzo fan2007</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007#top|<font color="#2A2722;">(talk)</font>]] @ </small></span> : « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @

to

<span style="white-space:nowrap; font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<span style="font-size:small; color:teal;"> « Gonzo fan2007</span>]] [[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007#top|<small style="color:#2A2722">(talk)</small>]] @ </span> : « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @

or if you prefer,

<span style="white-space:nowrap; font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<span style="font-size:small; color:teal;"> « Gonzo fan2007</span>]] [[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007#top|<small style="color:#2A7200">(talk)</small>]] @ </span> : « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @

Anomalocaris (talk) 20:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anomalocaris. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Emil R. Fischer

[edit]

On 13 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emil R. Fischer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Green Bay Packers president Emil R. Fischer was also a nationally-recognized leader in the Wisconsin cheese industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emil R. Fischer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Emil R. Fischer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gerald Francis Clifford

[edit]

On 14 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gerald Francis Clifford, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Green Bay Packers lawyer Gerald Francis Clifford served as assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin, was a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and lost a congressional election in 1934? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gerald Francis Clifford. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gerald Francis Clifford), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

[edit]
Thanks for your support for my unsuccessful RfA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Of course Hawkeye7. Best of luck. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added BradvChetsfordIzno
readded FloquenbeamLectonar
removed DESiegelJake WartenbergRjanagTopbanana

CheckUser changes

removed CallaneccLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed CallaneccFoxHJ MitchellLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Your GA nomination of Rockwood Lodge

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rockwood Lodge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rockwood Lodge

[edit]

The article Rockwood Lodge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rockwood Lodge for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rockwood Lodge

[edit]

The article Rockwood Lodge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rockwood Lodge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.

DYK for Rockwood Lodge

[edit]

On 27 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rockwood Lodge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Green Bay Packers' training facility Rockwood Lodge burned down less than four years after it was purchased by head coach Curly Lambeau? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rockwood Lodge. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rockwood Lodge), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

[edit]
The Hard Worker's Barnstar
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your bringing order where there was chaos, reason where there was randomness, scraping away the accretions of the eons and generally making the Four Awards site accessible. Gog the Mild (talk) 04:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Gog the Mild, hopefully it was a net improvement over what was previously there. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is a huge improvement. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration


ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

[edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFirToBeFree
removed AkhilleusAthaenaraJohn VandenbergMelchoirMichaelQSchmidtNeilNYoungamerican😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous