User talk:Arjayay/Archive 29
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Arjayay. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | → | Archive 34 |
Gudiyattam town history
The 1000-year-old Punganoor Amman Temple in Chunnambupet (old bus stand backside) was built by king krishna devar. Its walls are decorated with stone art works of Ramayanam Maha Kaviyam, Pancha Moorthy Thalum. The Temple has Devi Renugammbal Sannathi, Sivan Sannathi, Swarnambigai Sannathi, Vinayagar Sannathi, Guru Bhairavar Sannathi, Navagraha Sannthi, Subramaniyar Sannathi,
Hi sir This content is our town history sir please add this message on history page That's my humble request Thank you Parthidhoni (talk) 11:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Parthidhoni your first message was placed between two instructions each stating ♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦ - please read and follow such instructions
- As for this message - your addition keeps being deleted - and will continue to be deleted - because you are not citing reliable sources.
Reliable sources must be cited so readers can verify that the information is true, now, or at any point in the future. Each of the words in blue leads to an explanatory article, which you should read before editing further. You should also read Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how-to" instructions on referencing.
As you have not given any reliable sources I cannot add the information to the article, as that would be against Wikipedias policy of verifiability - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 12:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Fiction
I have reverted this edit as entirely misleading.
Nowhere another editor removed any sources but corrected gross misrepresentation of BBC source and added a reliable source which confirms this is a fictional subject. Per WP:FRINGE we are supposed to give more weight to the accurate position.
If this subject is not fictional then you are free to prove its historicity.
You are counting WP:FRINGE position by an IP and the page creator against Sitush, Azuredivay, me and other 3 editors who agreed that this is a fictional subject per discussions at: Talk:Nangeli#Truth or fiction, Talk:Nangeli#Fiction, Talk:Nangeli#Background section removal. Consensus is in favor to treat the subject as fiction. Wareon (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- As discussed on the talk page, there have been attempts to include this fictional story in the school syllabus and treat it as historical truth, that's why we highlight the subject as fiction. Now that you know all there is the consensus of 7-2 editors to present the subject as fictional, kindly watch out for disruptive edits like this. I note you have reverted it before as well. Thanks. Azuredivay (talk) 12:48, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Minor barnstar | |
Thanks for catching all the duplicate words. – robertsky (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks – robertsky - although I certainly can't claim that I catch all of them ! - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just a figurative use of of speech. :P – robertsky (talk) 09:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Commando Parachute Group
Hi! Is it possible to rename the Commando Parachute Group article "Parachute Commando Group" instead? It is the more appropriate word order for what is being tranlated. I am not able to do that myself but I think you might. Jules Agathias (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- As the page is not move protected, you are able to move it yourself, but please do not. It has been under the current title for over 14 years, so any change should be proposed on the talk page, and a consensus agreed, before any such move.
However, the title is a minor consideration - the major problem is that there are no references whatsoever, to support any of the claims made in the article. This was flagged up in 2013, but has still not been addressed, so any section, or even the entire article, could simply be deleted.
I have reverted your changes to the title in the infobox and the lead. This is the English Wikipedia, so the lead should use the English title, in bold, before the French. - Arjayay (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Vandalism found
Saurabh Kumar Chaubey, He is a guy who Always delete all Precious and Valuable Information of Language of Uttar Pradesh Article. This time I reverted all information but he will surely delete again all Information. You had also given him edit warring for deleting multiple references. Kindly please take Action for him otherwise he will again delete all information of this Article. 43.230.106.171 (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
"Retrieved" and other phobias
The Minor barnstar | |
I am currently under clinical treatment for my phobia of the word "retrieved". Thank you for your long-suffering patience, Arjayay. CerroFerro (talk) 16:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks CerroFerro although "Recieved" [sic] is actually a far bigger problem Wiki-wide ;-) - Arjayay (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- You understand, no doubt, that the "doctrine" of "I" before "E", except after "C" was pounded into children of my generation. CerroFerro (talk) 17:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Of course - although it is one of the worst "rules" ever invented - height, weight, their, etc - we even have an article on it I before E except after C - Arjayay (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, one of the worst things about searching for these misspellings is that I have to enter the misspelling so often, that my fingers start to think the misspelling is correct - beast wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Of course - although it is one of the worst "rules" ever invented - height, weight, their, etc - we even have an article on it I before E except after C - Arjayay (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- You understand, no doubt, that the "doctrine" of "I" before "E", except after "C" was pounded into children of my generation. CerroFerro (talk) 17:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Why this bias towards Chandragupta Maurya?
When cruel rulers like Alexander are termed as "The Great", not many are concerned to term it as "Boosterism". But when it is about Chandragupta Maurya, who became India's first historical emperor from a scratch, we can't credit him as one of the greats. Greatness doesn't imply just some extensive territorial conquest alone. Greatness means a character's impact and influence on a country. As such, Chandragupta Maurya is deserving to be called as "The Great". N Tanmay Prabhu (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello N Tanmay Prabhu
"Alexander the Great", (16,000.000 Google matches) is his WP:COMMONNAME in English, so that, under Wikipedias policies and guidelines, is the term that we use.
Chandragupta Maurya (958,000 Google matches) is not commonly called "Chandragupta Maurya the Great" (8,250 Google matches - many of which have a comma in the middle, as part of a sentence, rather than being his actual title).
Wikipedia, therefore, calls him Chandragupta Maurya, which is his WP:COMMONNAME in English, as per Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Arjayay (talk) 11:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Go ahead and Block.
If demanding a proposal to update the article is considered "Vandalism", then I have no hope from Wikipedia. Wikipedia is concerned only with glorification of western history and letting glorifying narratives of the western history. This is a propaganda against those who seek their roots. And Wikipedia is actively promoting this propaganda by not letting us rewrite our history. Its unfortunate. But I am not bothered. You can go ahead and block! N Tanmay Prabhu (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Merging Main Street (Buffalo) into Buffalo, NY
Hi, I wanted to give you a heads up about an article you edited. The creator of Main Street (Buffalo), User:Piffner and agreed with my review that the content would be better as a part of the article on Buffalo, NY, so they've moved it there and asked for a page deletion for Main Street (Buffalo). While this meets my sensibilities for speedy delete as an admin, I wanted to open a discussion on the article's talk page in case people who had recently edited the article would like to weigh in. --Zippy (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification Zippy - it is not an article I have any interest in - I merely changed "the the" to "the" - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
My article is not showing up in Google search !
Hello, I wrote an article for Speda TV, But this article does not appear in Google search. Please help me to solve this problem. Thanks. Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 18:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Mr-MohammedAzeez - I'm not sure why you are so worried about Google (other search engines are available) but this delay is absolutely standard.
All new pages are subject to approval by a New Page Patroller, and are not indexed by search engines until approved by that reviewer - so are not indexed if they are rejected. A review can take several weeks, however, there is a "long-stop" - if the page has not been approved, or rejected, by a New Page Patroller 90 days after it was created, it will become available for indexing - you then have to wait for Google's "crawler" to find the article.
As you created the article on 29 July, the 90 days will expire on 27 October - although it will probably be reviewed before then.
Before you ask, no, I can't review it, as I am not a New Page Patroller. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)- Thank you very much for the clarification, I just wanted to know why my article does not enter the search engines and this is a good explanation, thank you. Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 21:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Jammu and Kashmir
The Jammu and Kashmir is a union territory of India. I don't understand why you remove my edits that are in concurrent with the style of other pages related to Indian states and indian union territories. Editor8220 (talk) 12:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Editor8220 as already explained we do not use flags or emblems on articles relating to the disputed territories - hence the instruction No flags that you keep removing. There have also been discussions about the map, leading to consensus on the map you keep removing.
You have been given a discretionary sanctions warning, because of your edits in this area, but are ignoring that. You have also been given a 3RR warning for repeatedly making these edits - please stop before you are blocked. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:51, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
But. It is a union territory of India. And the disputing nation has no control over the area.
Look at the wikipedia page of "Xinjiang" parts of kashmir is shown in map of China and Chinese flag is used.
Look at the page of "Arunachal pradesh" disputed but controlled by India. Map and emblem of india is there. Editor8220 (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
For your concern, the pakistani controlled area is shaded seperately and is stated as "not administered" under the map. Editor8220 (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) You just must stop edit warring. If you want to discuss article contents, you should do it at Talk:Jammu and Kashmir (union territory). — kashmīrī TALK 13:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
The territory i edited is under the administration of India. The disputing nations have no control over ths area I indicated. Then why can't I usethe flag, map and emblem ofthe region? Editor8220 (talk) 05:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
I demand an answer. The article (Jammu and Kashmir) is about a union territory of India. That region is in central control of India. I cannot understand the logic of you trying to block my edit Editor8220 (talk) 11:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- (sigh) The consensus position has repeatedly been explained to you, and you have been advised to read the archives.
We know that Jammu and Kashmir is currently administered by India, and we also know that its ownership is contested.
Wikipedia does not decide who is "right" nor support one claim over another.
We, therefore, try to avoid partisan symbols and maps, the consensus being on displaying the map you keep removing.
Please stop edit-warring , or you will be blocked, again. - Arjayay (talk) 12:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Need to talk about something
I want to talk to you i am ebad aka the school boy, since i cannot contact you Need help from you 103.7.60.87 (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Ebad in Karachi, I won't be e-mailing you, but if you genuinely need help, please explain what the problem is here. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
List of Tamil films of 2021
@Arjayay: Please check the page List of Tamil films of 2021 properly. The sources didn’t mention that the film Master had grossed 300 crores. Please check the sources properly. Also please note that Filmibeat is not a reliable source as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Theoder2055 (talk) 13:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For continuing to revert particular issues on Wikipedia as you have done so far this month. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
Go ahead, block.
N Tanmay Prabhu (talk) 19:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Nowrunning
hi there, before you start removing all the Nowrunning sources. I have opened a discussion here (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Reliability_of_Nowrunning) because the reviews are written by independent critics. (for the older films early 2000s, if you remove nowrunning then there will be no sources. DareshMohan (talk) 02:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your notification DareshMohan. I have responded at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Reliability_of_Nowrunning and stopped any further deletions, until it has been resolved. Thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 21:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Reverts on 'Suraj Prakash' and 'Mahan Kosh' pages
As per WP:NOINDICSCRIPTS "Exceptions are articles on the script itself, articles on a language that uses the script, and articles on texts originally written in a particular script." It is permissible to include Gurmukhi script on these articles, seeing as they cover a text written in the script. You removed my inclusions on them. Also, you removed the Gurmukhi script on the main 'Gurdwara' page, yet the policy consensus states that including Indic script on pages relating to Indian religions is permissible. Please explain, thank you. ThethPunjabi (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi ThethPunjabi - thank you for your post.
You added Indic script to about 100 articles, leaving a lot of cleaning up to do - I avoided reverting a number of your edits, to obvious articles, such as Amrit Sanskar, Nimrata. Charhdi Kala and Antam Sanskar - if I accidentally reverted one or two which were in compliance with WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, I apologise. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)- Hello Arajay, thank you for your response. I am a new Wikipedia user so I have not become familiar with a lot of the consensus, policies, rules, & guidelines but I am eager to learn about them so I can avoid making edits like those in the future. I will restore the Gurmukhi text on the articles that would fall under the exceptions to WP:NOINDICSCRIPT (namely Sikhism-related pages and articles covering literature originally written in Gurmukhi/Punjabi). I appreciate us resolving this in a civil discussion and I look forward to positively contributing to Wikipedia and working with you and others on improving the coverage on India-related topics. ThethPunjabi (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parikshitgarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bania.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Wrong data
I think the area for Kolkata is wrong it would be 185 km² Srimonbanik2007 (talk) 12:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Srimonbanik2007 - Wikipedia is not interested in what you "think", what you "know", what you "have been told", or even what you have "researched".
- Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources, published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites, no vanity publishers and no predatory publishers.
These sources must be properly cited, in order to support any additions to, or changed in, our pages, so the information can be verified as true at any time in the future.
The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references from reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are repeatedly failing do do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references, or you are blocked. - Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to" guide on referencing.
If you can find a reliable source that states the area is 185 km² you can add that, provided you add a properly formatted reference, at the same time. - Arjayay (talk) 14:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)- @Arjayay I really found a mistake. Kolkata city proper include only whole part of Kolkata district. But in Kolkata district page it shows the area is 185 km² where as in Kolkata city page it shows the area is 200 something km² Srimonbanik2007 (talk) 06:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Srimonbanik2007 - Which figures do reliable sources give? and what are those WP:reliable sources ? - Arjayay (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Arjayay I really found a mistake. Kolkata city proper include only whole part of Kolkata district. But in Kolkata district page it shows the area is 185 km² where as in Kolkata city page it shows the area is 200 something km² Srimonbanik2007 (talk) 06:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Republic to Irish
The people that fall under the category "Republic of Ireland expatriate association footballers" need moving to the category "Irish expatriate association footballers" and the people that fall under the category "Republic of Ireland football managers" need moving to the category "Irish association football managers" LeicesterToNottingham123 (talk) 16:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- No, LeicesterToNottingham123. They are in the correct sub-categories and do not need moving to a more general category, which the sub-category is already part of, especially as this appears to be solely your PoV - Arjayay (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
How is my article still a draft?
Hello, Could you please explain why you claim that the article is still a draft when it clearly isn't anymore? It has been moved away from being a draft. Programer786 (talk) 22:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Draft:Imran Asad Khan is still a draft, since, as clearly explained on your talk page, it is unacceptable as an article as it has no references whatsoever, let alone the extensive coverage in reliable independent sources that every article needs. Please do not move it again, or you are likely to be blocked . - Arjayay (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Okay now I know that you are vandalizing posts, thanks for the proof. Programer786 (talk) 22:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Stop vandalizing
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Pakistani lawyers, you may be blocked from editing - Programer786 (talk) 22:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Person who keeps changing the budgets and/or gross of Indian films
You have frequently reverted edits by a person who who keeps changing the budgets and/or gross of Indian films. He/she is at it again, so I have opened a sockpuppet investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jayaprakashtpm.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Toddy1 - I was going to look into this after Akshaykumarvanam appeared this morning - it was obviously too close to Akshaykumarvaanam, which was already on my check list - but I then got called out, and you started the SPI before I got back. Well done on finding so many probably linked accounts - If only these were the only ones ! - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Anabella Lenzu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anabella Lenzu, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anabella Lenzu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Meghwal
I am the member of this community and I'm also prominent scholar of IIT Bombay So I know what I write for my community You all the people doesn't know about our community and write about us This is not a fare Only a member of community can write proper things
Thank you 😊 Sathya G INDIA (talk) 01:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sathya G INDIA
- Firstly, when there are clear instructions like " ♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦ " and " ♦♦♦ Only add a person to this list if they already have their own article on the English Wikipedia ♦♦♦" please do as you are asked, rather than putting your post at the top of the page, without a title, and repeatedly adding non-notable people, without their own articles
- As for your post above - Wikipedia is not interested in what you "think", what you "know", what you "have been told", or even what you have "researched".
- Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources, published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites, no vanity publishers and no predatory publishers.
These sources must be properly cited, in order to support any additions to, or changed in, our pages, so the information can be verified as true, at any time in the future.
The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references from reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are failing do do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted.
- Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to" guide on referencing.
- On Wkipedia you do not have any more rights, when writing about your community, than any other editor. It could be argued that you have a form of Conflict of interest, as you are unlikely to be as objective/unbiased an editor than an outsider - Arjayay (talk) 09:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced edits by new user
Hi, would you kindly take a look at these unsourced edits. Thanks. - 117.201.119.252 (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks - editor from Darjiling = I had already warned him about adding his name to lists, and was looking at his edits to Kolkata when you left your posts - I have reverted a number of edits and left 2 final warnings - if he makes more unsourced additions/changes please report him to WP:AIV as his editing hours are different from mine - Thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 11:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks and welcome - 117.201.119.252 (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi again. The user is still adding unsourced [1], and unnecessary [2] content. Please take a look. - 117.201.113.59 (talk) 11:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks and welcome - 117.201.119.252 (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Blocked for a month. Bishonen | tålk 14:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC).
- Very likely that the this new user is this blocked one, the editing area is same alongwith disruptive POV edits. Notice the unsourced edits here. Also note this comment. I reverted some of their disruptive changes here. Pinging @Bishonen:. - 117.201.114.161 (talk) 09:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Considering the source used in the article "Govt withdraws Assamese as official language from Barak valley", isn't the other one the sole language of the region of the state instead of being additional?. - 117.201.112.40 (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Did u think that Sports are not valuable or notable thing to be mention in Darbhanga Page?
Did u think that Sports are not valuable or notable thing to be mention in Darbhanga Page ? 2401:4900:385C:8F9F:4FED:2A76:246F:D847 (talk) 14:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello IP who geolocates to Delhi. There was no point in just having a list of sports - without any sources, or any details. I suspect there are things to be said, but we need specific details, supported by references from independent, reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 14:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Don't get biased. If You feel that there is some arrangement mistakes then kindly correct it. But after added reliable sources through national news portal it should be undo किशना (talk) 14:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- किशना My answer remains exactly the same as I gave you before you created an account. A list of random sports is not a useful addition to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Accidentally edited an article anonymously?
I made an edit to Abdul Karim Kabariti's wikipage anonymously on accident and wanted it to be attributed to my user. I thought that undoing the changes and redoing would attribute the edit to my user, is this the wrong way to go about this? TrotskTrotsk (talk) 20:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- TrotskTrotsk you can't re-attribute something. What you suggest would just have looked as if you had deleted an IP's edits and then realised that the IP was correct. As it was, I reverted you 3 minutes after your deletion, so you had plenty of time to try your method, but didn't - I suggest you let it go, as further edits will just associate your User account with the IP address. losing one of the main advantages of having an account - Arjayay (talk) 20:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Request regarding adding a library section
Sir I req you to please add the library section or update it on Annamalai University page so the readers can find all the necessary things about it.
Adding library section on wiki will be helpful for readers and students. Please add it your own. 2405:201:4023:6074:F1C6:456F:D5C3:738A (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
"All life is yoga" link
On Karma yoga#External links I added an archive link to "All life is yoga". Do you think it's an appropriate external link? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 01:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Kurup (film)
Hello, i was reading kurup (film) & i saw your last edits, im a director & honestly a big fan of Walid Riachy a main actor in the movie & when i was reading i noticed that his name isn’t highlighted, wanted to go to his wikipedia but couldn’t find one, wanted to read more about him to get in touch with him for a movie.
Im just highlighting that because he is a notable actor & would be nice having all info about him in Wikipedia & i thought maybe i should get in touch with someone who edited the article. Wish you a nice day Denisbock (talk) 03:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenia Os, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page K23.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Stoke edit removed
Hello, I hope you get this. I have edited the Stoke page several times over the last 2 years or more but they keep getting removed! My source is me I live here! Many that's
Sue HaggisHarris (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- HaggisHarris:-
- Wikipedia is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what you "know", what you have been told, or even what you have found out.
Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites no vanity publishers, and no predatory publishers.
These sources must be properly cited in order to support any information added to, or changed in our pages, so the information can be verified as true at any time in the future.
The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references from reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are repeatedly failing to do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references.
Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the simple "how to" guide on adding citations. - Arjayay (talk) 20:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Many thanks for all your wonderful information of "how to" on Wiki, I shan't bother. What's the point in having rubbish/false information on it? Many thanks
Sue HaggisHarris (talk) 07:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Box office India is the most trustable source for Bollywood films.
As per Box Office India report housefull 4 budget is 162 cr Zero budget is 270 cr Kindly check that Brodaddy12cr (talk) 14:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Three problems Brodaddy12cr
Firstly, as discussed at very great length here, despite your claim, Box Office India is NOT a particularly trustworthy source
Secondly, as explained at WP:ICTFSOURCES "film budget figures at BoxOfficeIndia.com include print and advertising costs" so they are not comparable with other sources and this needs noting "if we can't find a better source"
Thirdly, even if it was a reliable source, you failed to add it as a reference in the article - you just changed the figure, so we have a figure from one source and a reference linking to a different source, with a different figure. Please stop making such changes - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
To add one more page regards to goddess temple
Please it's my humble request sir to add a one more page regards to goddess information Aairenuka956 (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Stop deleting my edits, you are ruining everything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vip ModzLB (talk • contribs) 11:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- No Vip ModzLB, you need to stop adding unsourced claims and rumours - you are on a final warning, so could be blocked if you continue. - Arjayay (talk) 12:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- wtf is wrong with you I live in Kfaraakka, if you don't know that MP Georges Atallah lives here, the whole residents of Kfaraakka knows Vip ModzLB (talk) 12:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Vip ModzLB Wikipedia is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what you "know", what you have been told, or even what you have researched.
Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites no vanity publishers, and no predatory publishers.
These sources must be properly cited in order to support any information added to, or changed in our pages, so the information can be verified as true at any time in the future.
The responsibility for providing citations is on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references citing reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are repeatedly failing to do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references.
Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the simple "how to" guide on adding citations. - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Vip ModzLB Wikipedia is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what you "know", what you have been told, or even what you have researched.
- wtf is wrong with you I live in Kfaraakka, if you don't know that MP Georges Atallah lives here, the whole residents of Kfaraakka knows Vip ModzLB (talk) 12:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leiocephalus sixtoi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobadilla.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate Words
Hello, I have seen that you often remove duplicate words from articles. I am wondering if you have an automated tool to detect those errors. That's because I commit that error a lot myself, and then you clean up my errors quite quickly. I'm I'm not not sure sure why I commit that error error a lot lot, it just happens naturally naturally. Thanks for your efforts in cleaning up such mistakes by myself and others. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi User:Doomsdayer520 - Thanks for your appreciation of my efforts. No, I don't have any automated tools, I just have a lot of stored searches for such errors which I use daily/weekly/monthly, depending on the historic frequency of the particular error. I often wonder why editors do not use spelling/grammar checks on their edits, which would pick these up, as most browsers now include these as a standard. - Arjayay (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kano state
Hi, you revert my edit while i am still working on the It is a live edit. I am presently working on it just discovered it has disappeared within a twinkle of an eye and then, I started wondering why I couldn't use the visual edit anymore. I am quite offended. Margob28 (talk) 12:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
David Carradine sources.
Greetings.
Regarding the National Enquirer and other tabloid sources in that article, that's the point of the edition, as explained lengthy in a note at the Talk Page.
There are two different parts: Investigation, and, Media reaction. The media includes the tabloids. Taking away the separation and the explanation puts Dr. Rojanasunan's opinion and what the ex-wives said as part of the investigation, which they were not.
Wikipedia allows the use of those sources when the subject in question is related to the sources; when one edits, a warning appears telling that, and this is precisely the case: showing the difference between what the actual investigation was and what the media said.
There's still more material to add about the media circus that this case was. Do you understand the point? Thanks. Maykiwi (talk) 01:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Novo Holdings A/S, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henrik Poulsen.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
سلام، شما کی هستید؟
من از بدو تا اتمام سازمان آنجا بودم، ، از اقوام نزدیک جناب ارتشبد بودم، از یاران تبرزین و همراه رزمندگان در مرز سرو بهمراه سرهنگ زینعلی،، شما را به خاطر نمی آورم. تورج 104.193.4.98 (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, and a question
Thanks for bolding that title at Board of Control for Cricket in India; I might have messed that up.
You think that starting with "Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is the governing body" ... instead of "The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is the governing body..."? Somehow the "the" sounds better to me. David10244 (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Arjayay! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, I had intended to apply the "nonconstructive" edit message to Gaudiumrr, not you. So apologies and happy editing! Skynxnex (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- No worries Skynxnex - we all mis-click occasionally - but thanks for the apology - Arjayay (talk) 21:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations on your longevity. 18:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Removal of content without resourch on it
I bet you have not resourched before editing page.As Sambhaji's page itself contains very hypothetical editing which not parallel to real historical sources.now let's come my edit,so you objects that I have deleted references which in your sense is 'valid'.So about that execution statement only John Richard support that statement which put on this page but there are Indian sources says different opinions&also foreign letters says same things as in Indian sources so in that mean we also should put these opinions&sources on page right?so we have to put only neutral point of view that's what I done.i delete that statement itself and simply avoided that topic because this page is not about that. &for that military battle statement,you should resourch because I was already provided sources about it very earlier Prathmesh Bhale (talk) 05:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Changes to Ms. NJ Nandini's page
Kindly note that whatever addition made to Ms Nandini's Wikipedia page has been approved by Ms Nandini, herself 116.68.85.227 (talk) 16:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- You appear to misunderstand Wikipedia and how it works. Wikipedia is not like Facebook or other social media.
- Our article N. J. Nandini is not "Ms Nandini's Wikipedia page" but Wikipedia's page about N. J. Nandini
- We have no interest in what N. J. Nandini wants to appear on that page, the contents will be solely determined by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
- N. J. Nandini, or anyone working on her behalf, should not edit that page, as they have a clear Conflict of interest. Please read WP:Conflict of interest for how she, or anyone working on her behalf, can request edits to be made at Talk:N. J. Nandini. Such requests must include references to independent reliable sources - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Query
I see you reverted some info put up on the Bokaro Airport page by someone using a suspected sock puppet account. Is that info actually incorrect - I saw it had refs? Styx & Stones (talk) 10:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Styx & Stones - as explained in my edit summary it was deleted WP:RBI
This is long term abuse editor that I have been chasing for over 2 years and 89 sock accounts - although I'm sure I must have missed several.
He has a habit of including some false/PoV information in among a mass of good info, so if you want to reuse his references please check them, and put your additions in your own words. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
You are a boss at copyediting
You are persistently contributing copyedits. Your work is not unnoticed, and is greatly appreciated. SecretName101 (talk) 17:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Quetta disruptive edit even after warning
he again edited the same way after you undid it. User Talk:PakistanHistorian Inspite of being warned multiple times against disruptive editing, he keeps on repeating. PakistaniHistorian (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
please see and help
hi i want to be a big creator like you please help Tanish Bainad (talk) 13:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
KURMI IS Kshatriya caste not sudhr
Sir Kurmi is Vedic Kshatriya caste.. we can see in Satpath Brahmin & Bhargav up puran they have described that KurmibIs kshatriya.. Here is wrong information that Kurmi under Shudr on Wiki. Mahraja Jyotiraditya Scindhia had said that My caste is kurmi & they belongs rajpariwar of gwalior. 2405:204:3409:2D3:0:0:15CE:18A1 (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Sakshi Maharaj
You reverted my edit here but the content is supported by the existing source. Can you self-revert? 103.250.137.140 (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Done - Sorry, IP from Ahmedabad, I did not see the retraction in that reference when I skim-read it, but you are right, it is clearly there, so I have self-reverted. Thank you for pointing out my error so politely - Arjayay (talk) 09:00, 24 November 2022 (UTC)-
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Informing about mistake
The latest literacy rate data I had added in West Bengal page is from Wikipedia only. Manideepa Banik (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Manideepa Banik - Wikipedia is not a reliable source - Arjayay (talk) 18:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
What are the reliable sources?
What are the reliable sources? If my data isn't from a reliable sources then it means there are many wrong data in Wikipedia. I only take data from sources that wikipedia use. If you want proof, I can give you proof. Manideepa Banik (talk) 07:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Do not provide outdated information
Dear sir you are giving old information again and again.I have been in this city for the past 18 years. I have added all the new information of this city, knowing it all correctly. Please do not delete the information and give old information. Thank you sir Rishi1139 (talk) 14:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Rishi1139 XXX - Wikipedia is not interested in where you live, what you "know", or even what you have "researched".
- Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources, published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites, no vanity publishers and no predatory publishers.
These sources must be properly cited, in order to support any additions to, or changed in, our pages, so the information can be verified as true at any time in the future.
The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references from reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are repeatedly failing do do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references, or you are blocked.
- Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to" guide on referencing. - Arjayay (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Sirsi, Karnataka
Sir your warned me to not edit on Sirsi, Karnataka but still i reverted other user edits, I am apologies for that, but i have reason to do that, I am explained why i reverted this edits on Talk:Sirsi,_Karnataka, i request you please don't block me , I further request you to Add Sirsi, Karnataka to your watch list, thank you Shirasi (talk) 07:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
The edits
Sir the edits I did are of course are important for readers but this isn't my profession and you're experience here , hope you'll research my addition by yourself, thank you. 103.137.160.108 (talk) 17:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Other posts
Post left between 2 tags stating ♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦-
- So when can I start editing without my editing being reverted Iffy Layla (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
vijay sethupathi also fondly called by his fans as sooper cowboy also known by the name makkal selvan.
Question
I've reduced the plot section as requested, but one may wonder if featuring a non-linear narrative (separated in two timelines) as well as an additional Rashomon effect and lots of twists, the plot structure could fit the exception profile (cited in WP:FILMPLOT) of the film's structure is unconventional, such as with non-linear storylines, or unless the plot is too complicated to summarize in this range.
. Don't you think it may be actually the case, Arjayay?--Asqueladd (talk) 19:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Asqueladd thanks for your post. You have, fairly quickly, reduced the plot to 675 words, and there still seem to be opportunities for further cuts if more words are needed for the important details. Take the first sentence "Set in 1979, the fiction follows a woman (Alice Gould de Almenara) entering a psychiatric ward." could be "in 1979, Alice Gould de Almenara enters a psychiatric ward" (10 words instead of 16). As there are no other dates is that relevant? and is her full name relevant? could it be "Alice Gould enters a psychiatric ward" (6 words instead of 16)
There are plenty of films with non-linear storylines, but this one does not seem to be particularly complex - IMHO then, no, I think it fits 700 words without being over-confusing. If you want a second opinion, please seek one - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 20:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)- The character is variously adressed as "Alice", "Alice Gould", "Alice Gould de Almenara", "Alicia de Almenara", and "Alicia" in the film. Several subplots have been entirely shunned, including the entire dynamics around the Gnome, Rómulo, Remo, Elephant Man, and the so-called "oscillating girl" characters (the trigger of the second death in the facility and the only one actually "solved" in the film); the mommy-like relationship (or mommy impersonation) of the protagonist with one of the twins; or the terms of the relationship of the protagonist with doctor Arellano (the reason the latter supports the protagonist), to name a few, or the detail that the protagonist's psyche chose to feign the illness the protagonist actually suffers from, or the dream-like nature of the experiences of the protagonist in the cage (the reason the protagonists develops yet another conspiracy). Other details such as the nature of the letter by Dr. Donadío (do not trust this woman... she lies) at the beginning of the film, the protagonist claiming to have told her husband that she left for Buenos Aires (instead of entering the ward) as well as the purported whereabouts of Dr. Donadío (the reason for his absence) are perhaps also important to the plot. The connection between the two timelines (concerning the protagonist being the missing patient) has been weakened. As whether if the (time) setting is important, yes I think it is important for any film, I think, particularly if made explicit. The date setting could be worded along the lines you are proposing while conveying the same, indeed.--Asqueladd (talk) 20:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Asqueladd This is getting quite detailed, and would be better copied over to Talk:God's Crooked Lines, where other editors might (hopefully) make some input, and where it would serve as a permanent record of the discussion. I also wonder if you have seen Wikipedia:How to streamline a plot summary, which might give some hints as to how to keep it short. - Arjayay (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- The character is variously adressed as "Alice", "Alice Gould", "Alice Gould de Almenara", "Alicia de Almenara", and "Alicia" in the film. Several subplots have been entirely shunned, including the entire dynamics around the Gnome, Rómulo, Remo, Elephant Man, and the so-called "oscillating girl" characters (the trigger of the second death in the facility and the only one actually "solved" in the film); the mommy-like relationship (or mommy impersonation) of the protagonist with one of the twins; or the terms of the relationship of the protagonist with doctor Arellano (the reason the latter supports the protagonist), to name a few, or the detail that the protagonist's psyche chose to feign the illness the protagonist actually suffers from, or the dream-like nature of the experiences of the protagonist in the cage (the reason the protagonists develops yet another conspiracy). Other details such as the nature of the letter by Dr. Donadío (do not trust this woman... she lies) at the beginning of the film, the protagonist claiming to have told her husband that she left for Buenos Aires (instead of entering the ward) as well as the purported whereabouts of Dr. Donadío (the reason for his absence) are perhaps also important to the plot. The connection between the two timelines (concerning the protagonist being the missing patient) has been weakened. As whether if the (time) setting is important, yes I think it is important for any film, I think, particularly if made explicit. The date setting could be worded along the lines you are proposing while conveying the same, indeed.--Asqueladd (talk) 20:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Omar Bogle
I would like to tell you that my recent edit statement was true about Omar Bogles personal life 2A02:C7C:9408:B700:1097:F9D9:9CE8:B606 (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Regarding edits in Sindhis
Hello Arjayay!
I hope you are fine.
Yes it is true that the edits that i copied from articles Culture of Sindh and Sindhi literature are without reference but as per the WikiPedia's policy, you can copy attributes from other pages if you don't want to manually add them by researching, and probably in future i will try to add as much citations as i can.
Thank you, Regards. NameIsShaheer (talk) 09:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Regarding edit in Kurla article
Hi, Kapadia Nagar is a locality in Kurla since 35+ years now. So I don't understand why there's a need to provide a source for the same as there's no source provided for other localities like chadva nagar or mahavir in the same article. SureShotWinner (talk) 01:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- SureShotWinner You are right to point out that Chadva Nagar and Mahavir are unsourced - so I have deleted them as well - Arjayay (talk) 09:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I think you're wrong. Wind Tre and 3 Italy are the same company, search for the VAT number or see this official financial statements. Thank you. Have a nice editing. 2002:9719:524:0:9132:2252:FC1:968B (talk) 17:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} |
Donner60 (talk) 04:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
Hello Arjayay : Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RV (talk) 02:06, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Fixed School
Dear Arjayay, A CBSE School has been added in Basti Wikipedia under education named Central Academy. That School is a Branch of Central Academy Organisation India. Which is a notable School has it's own English Wikipedia page. and same can be verified at CBSE website. Therefore I have added the same with two references. Requesting you to please consider the same. Thankyou 112.79.165.131 (talk) 06:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- You keep linking to a school in Florida. Central Academy Senior Secondary School is a chain of schools and there is no article on the branch in Basti, so it is ineligible for inclusion. I have, also, deleted Kendriya Vidyalaya from that list as it is a similar chain without an article on the specific school in Basti. - Arjayay (talk) 12:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Listen to me
I have to remove the "jenny Controversy" in Ishowspeed's Wikipedia page, its just really off to me and inappropriately for young kids who visit that, also People and everyone. MissingWikia (talk) 21:36, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- MissingWikia - you don't have to do anything, and Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED - that information is also sourced - Arjayay (talk) 21:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- how did Wikipedia allowed to be NOTCENSORED to their policies, why? MissingWikia (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- you know that they allowed "sexism" to their pages MissingWikia (talk) 22:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- how did Wikipedia allowed to be NOTCENSORED to their policies, why? MissingWikia (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 North Dakota Senate election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Cleary.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Source says both positive and mixed reviews.[1] Also 3/5 seems to be positive in India. RealAspects (talk) 13:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Help me
Hello! Sorry to bother you, but for some reason the article by Orinbaev Amanbay Tilewbaevich was retracted, there is a clear source, he has been the chairman of the Jokargy Kenes since August 26, and the deputy.
Help to move from the draft to the main article QRNKS (talk) 04:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thanks for fixing the typos on my first Wikipedia edit!
Zhikeng (talk) 02:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Happy New Year, Arjayay! In 2022, other editors thanked you 2132 times using the thanks tool. This made you the #1 most thanked Wikipedian in 2022. Congratulations and, well, thank you for all that you do for Wikipedia. Here's to 2023! Mz7 (talk) 23:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC) |
- My congratulations and thanks too, both to you and to Mz7 for recognising editors who quietly make Wikipedia better in so many ways. Certes (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Arjayay!
Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Early cholas
How about moderating the Early cholas page.
Some user selectively named Rasna boy undoing all the cited article. 1.38.104.185 (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year
Hi @Arjayay:. Happy New Year!! I hope you and your family have a great 2023. scope_creepTalk 00:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Gurkhas
Hello! Gurkhas Is Only Called To Nepali Citizens And Nepali Speaking Indian People Are Not Gurkhas Because There Was A Kingdom Called The Kingdom Of Gorkha (Nepal) And The People Who Lives In The Kingdom Of Gorkha Is Called Gurkhas. Nepali Speaking Indian People Aren't Living In The Kingdom Of Gorkha. So, I Make The Correction. You Can Check It. Anonymous078 (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you ...
happy new year |
---|
Thank you for constantly repairing duplicate words! The colours of my January calendar image are Ukrainian for a reason. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
today, I point at two singers I whose performance I enjoyed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)