User talk:David10244

Welcome!

Hi David10244! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:44, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU Thanks... I'm not completely new, but thanks for the welcome. I have a couple of hundred edits under (probably) two IP addresses. But I figured it was time for an account... David10244 (talk) 02:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm aware that you've edited under IP addresses before. We already interacted. :P LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought we had... :-) David10244 (talk) 02:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU I just noticed that one of the two IP addresses that I edited under, before making an account, had exactly 500 edits. That's weird! Then either my IP address changed, or I made this account. I didn't realize that I had edited so much with that IP. And no reverts, I think. I don't have a question or anything; I just thought that was interesting. David10244 (talk) 08:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David in the millions

Welcome to the clan. In the U.S. it was very popular 1940-1980, has since dropped off. According to the Wikipedia article David (name), tens of millions of males are named David in English, and more in variants in other languages. The article could use referenced updating at the statistics section. David notMD (talk) 11:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD My parents told me that the name means "beloved", as that article says. Some people do like me! Wait, what's this: "David ... means "beloved", derived from the root dôwd (דּוֹד), which originally meant "to boil"..."

To boil? That's weird! David10244 (talk) 09:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

re committed ID

Just to clarify something in response to this edit (whose thread has since been archived): I was not advising against committed identities in general. In fact, I encourage the use of committed identities, and I have one on my user page. I was advising against the specific scheme proposed by the OP (based around a physical Brazilian ID etc.), which is outside the standard process listed at Wikipedia:Committed identity, and would make verification much harder than needed. Tigraan^{Click here for my talk page ("private" contact)} 09:01, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tigraan Oh, I see. That makes sense -- I wouldn't use a nonstandard method to create a committed identity. I get what you meant by "standard process now. Thanks for explaining that. David10244 (talk) 09:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. delete phone # from Talk

I agree David notMD (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed from the talk page; not from history. David10244 (talk) 06:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Lemonaka

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Raimi Productions. Lemonaka (talk) 07:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Lemonaka, I will look there. David10244 (talk) 12:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the foreign dignitaries and Military Adjutant at the Closing Ceremony Athens 2004 Olympics

I just want to put in the dignitaries at the Closing Ceremony Athens 2004 Olympics. I want to add is President's Adjutant Officer of the Hellenic Air Force Colonel Georgios Dritsakos, who have accompanied the President of the Hellenic Republic Constantinos Stephanopoulos, Their Royal Highnesses the Crown Prince Felipe and the Crown Princess Letizia of Spain, and Their Royal Highnesses the Crown Prince Philippe and Princess Mathilde of Belgium. And I want to make corrections and add with references. Thank you. It's not my fault. And I'm sorry. And I owe you an apology. I didn't do anything wrong because of Materialscientist 100.2.114.167 (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New editors and new articles

I saw your discussion at WP:VPP. I wonder if this chart would be helpful.

Registered editors by edit count (all registered accounts)
If you have made...	you are about 1 in	then you rank in the...	or the...	That's more than...
1 edit	3	top 30% of all users	top 14,400,000 of all users	70% of all users
2 edits	5	top 20% of all users	top 9,600,000 of all users	80% of all users
5 edits	10	top 10% of all users	top 4,800,000 of all users	90% of all users
10 edits	20	top 5% of all users (the autoconfirmed)	top 2,410,000 of all users	95% of all users
100 edits	100	top 1% of all users	top 482,000 of all users	99% of all users
500 edits	400	top 0.25% of all users (the extended confirmed)	top 120,000 of all users	99.75% of all users
1,000 edits	1,000	top 0.1% of all users	top 48,000 of all users	99.9% of all users
10,000 edits	4,000	top 0.025% of all users	top 12,000 of all users	99.975% of all users
25,000 edits	10,000	top 0.01% of all users	top 4,800 of all users	99.99% of all users
50,000 edits	20,000	top 0.005% of all users	top 2,400 of all users	99.995% of all users
100,000 edits	50,000	top 0.002% of all users	top 900 of all users	99.998% of all users
250,000 edits	200,000	top 0.0005% of all users	top 200 of all users	99.9995% of all users
500,000 edits	1,000,000	top 0.0001% of all users	top 50 of all users	99.9999% of all users
1,000,000 edits	3,300,000	top 0.000031% of users	top 13 of all users	99.99997% of all users
For the purposes of this table, a "user" is a person who has a registered account on the English Wikipedia.

Registered editors by edit count (only successful contributors)
If you have made...	you are about 1 in	then you rank in the...	or the...	That's more than...
1 edit	1	–	one of 14,400,000 contributors	–
2 edits	1-2	top 65% of contributors	top 9,400,000 of all contributors	35% of all contributors
5 edits	3	top 30% of contributors	top 4,300,000 of all contributors	70% of all contributors
10 edits	5	top 20% of contributors (the autoconfirmed)	top 2,896,000 of all contributors	80% of all contributors
100 edits	40	top 2.5% of contributors	top 362,000 of all contributors	97.5% of all contributors
500 edits	133	top 0.75% of contributors (the extended confirmed)	top 108,000 of all contributors	99.25% of all contributors
1,000 edits	200	top 0.5% of contributors	top 72,000 of all contributors	99.5% of all contributors
10,000 edits	1,000	top 0.1% of contributors	top 14,400 of all contributors	99.9% of all contributors
25,000 edits	3,333	top 0.03% of contributors	top 4,300 of all contributors	99.97% of all contributors
50,000 edits	6,666	top 0.015% of contributors	top 2,100 of all contributors	99.985% of all contributors
100,000 edits	14,000	top 0.007% of contributors	top 1,000 of all contributors	99.993% of all contributors
250,000 edits	66,666	top 0.0015% of contributors	top 200 of all contributors	99.9985% of all contributors
500,000 edits	250,000	top 0.0004% of contributors	top 50 of all contributors	99.9996% of all contributors
For the purposes of this table, a "contributor" is an account with at least one published edit on the English Wikipedia.

At the moment, only 5% of all registered editors are able to create articles directly in the mainspace here at the English Wikipedia (and almost none of them actually do, either through a lack of interest or because they've stopped editing entirely).

The question is: How many fewer do you really want to have that ability? WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WhatamIdoing, that is a very interesting chart. Does "top x ... of all editors" mean "all editors who have created an article that has not been deleted (in some short time frame)"? If not, then maybd it doesn't apply to the issue of article creation. But I'll think about it.

I find it kind of hard to believe that some significant fraction of editors have created an article that sticks, as their first edit (or their first set of edits). It's also kind of hard (is it possible?) to write a new draft and submit it for review, and have one total edit at the point of submission. (That situation also means that they have not put anything on their Talk page either, which is OK, but...)

Do we know how many editors have one edit when they Submit? Those 50% are not creating new articles, so the chart is not completely relevant, I think. I could be wrong. David10244 (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This chart counts all registered editors, including accounts that have never made any edits at the English Wikipedia (e.g., someone who edits in a different language, but read an article; someone who doesn't edit but wanted access to a setting in the prefs; someone who wanted to edit but who couldn't figure out how to do it) and accounts that haven't edited for many years (e.g., due to losing the password, or losing interest).

About a decade ago (I've not heard anything more recent) about a quarter of all first edits was to create an article in the mainspace. Almost all first edits were in the mainspace. Wikipedia:Request a query might be able to give you more recent numbers. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WhatamIdoing OK, thanks. David10244 (talk) 10:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

On the teahouse, someone asked a pointless question on the teahouse asking what 1 plus 1 was? It is easy to figure it out. I'm replying on here because the discussion got closed. It is my first seeing a discussion on the teahouse get closed. Cwater1 (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwater1 Threads at the Teahouse don't usually get closed in my experience -- they are archived pretty quickly. Threads at other places get closed more often... especially for "unblock requests" and sometimes at wp:afchelp. But, yeah, sometimes at the Teahouse. David10244 (talk) 04:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That conversation where someone asked what 1 plus 1 is could have been removed since it was not necessary. Cwater1 (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwater1 Questions aren't usually removed though, even those questions that are gibberish (this one wasn't, of course). The hosts answer them (usually) politely. :-) David10244 (talk) 09:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse host - belated welcome

Dear David10244,

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
templates to use and, of course:
the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

My apologies for the extremely belated welcome. You've made an absolutely astounding 638 useful contributions to the Teahouse thus far, and are currently the 11th-most active Teahouse Host!

Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Moyes Thanks, and sorry for this belated reply. I have gotten very busy lately and I have not been able to contribute much. You folks do a great job at the help desk(s), even if you sometimes have to answer the same questions more than once! I might be back soon. Thanks again. David10244 (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

محمد عبد الهادي محمود الزعاترة

@1 176.29.150.183 (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]