User talk:Aoba47/Archive 34

Wikipedia:Peer review/The 40-Year-Old Virgin/archive1

Greetings! Would you mind leaving some comments for this peer review? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Thank you for the message. I will look through the article and put up some comments next week if that is okay with you. I have actually never seen this movie so hopefully that will help with my review lol.

Here are a few quick things though for now. I would encourage you to archive your citations as link rot and death can be annoying. I do not believe the article covers any academic analysis on the film (and apologies if I somehow overlooked this), and after doing a brief Google Scholar search, I found some coverage there. The final thing is I think the lead could use some work and I would avoid having it be just a single paragraph.

I hope this is helpful and I look forward to reading the article. I am also surprised the Kelly Clarkson line is not referenced at all as it is still discussed today (like this recent interview on The Kelly Clarkson Show). Aoba47 (talk) 00:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've given a helpful start for sure :). Sadly, I have no idea how to create archives for links, so somebody else will have to take care of that aspect. Adding that Kelly Clarkson bit isn't a problem, and I'll be sure to look more into analysis of the movie. I'll let you decide whether to watch this in full before looking more into the plot section (it contains spoilers). SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is actually a bot that helps with archiving references, but I would be more than happy to do the archiving when I read through the article. I am extremely grateful for the editor (or group of editors) who made this bot because archiving citations manually can be rather annoying and time-consuming lol. The bot can be a little finicky at times so if it is not working, I'd try again later (and again, I would be more than happy to do this part). I do not mind spoilers, but I appreciate the heads-up! Aoba47 (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
55	Siena Goines (talk)	Add sources
108	School's Out (1992 film) (talk)	Add sources
4,224	Tom & Jerry (2021 film) (talk)	Add sources
101	Frontin' (talk)	Add sources
54	Bradford Meade (talk)	Add sources
934	Da Brat (talk)	Add sources
50	Flicker World Tour (talk)	Cleanup
923	Sith (talk)	Cleanup
10	American Idol Season 3: Greatest Soul Classics (talk)	Cleanup
502	American Idol (season 3) (talk)	Expand
282	Teairra Marí (talk)	Expand
30,824	Zack Snyder (talk)	Expand
286	The Dynasty: Roc La Familia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
210	Jaz-O (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
50	Camile Velasco (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
47	Mr. Incredible and Pals (talk)	Merge
2,788	Borat (talk)	Merge
269	Star Wars video games (talk)	Merge
5,078	Kevin Alejandro (talk)	Wikify
7	Spike (novel) (talk)	Wikify
29	Calling All Lovers (talk)	Wikify
4	The Unprepared (talk)	Orphan
2	Denis Agre (talk)	Orphan
3	290 Square Meters (talk)	Orphan
127	Bilabial consonant (talk)	Stub
10	So Many Pros (talk)	Stub
33	Tamar (album) (talk)	Stub
13	Reduced eye (talk)	Stub
15	Yan Moore (talk)	Stub
8	Gotta Getcha (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Aoba47. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Ashley yoursmile! 06:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How are you doing?

Long time no see. How are you doing? Lately, I've been watching movies from Eastwood and Michael B. Jordan. Also, I used to watch that sitcom Friends as a kid so I watched its tv special. In regards to articles, I've managed to make some Danganronpa articles GA and recently nominated Danganronpa 2: Goodbye Despair. The third game probably has one of the most controversial endings in gaming narrative considering every breaks the fourth wall and experience catharsis as they realize they are fictional characters created to suffer because they blame the gamers who bought the titles just to see them suffer. I'm not making this up. It was a really the strangest gaming experience since the ending of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty where Raiden is subtly revealed to be the player's avatar to the point he throws away the the player's name in the ending. Also, I tried expanding a more peaceful but sad series named To Your Eternity which I also aim to make it GA. In case you have free time could you give it a look? There is also Goodbye Despair but I don't think you'd like it. Anyway, happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 14:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Thank you for your message. I am pretty good. I am just trying to be more productive with everything. How are you? Surprisingly enough, I do not think I have seen a film with either Clint Eastwood or Michael B. Jordan lol (although I am sure they are both quite good). I am a big fan of Friends, but I have not watched the reunion as I do not have an HBO Max subscription (and I am not exactly in a rush to get another streaming subscription).

The Danganronpa 2: Goodbye Despair ending somewhat reminds me of Star Ocean: Till the End of Time, in which the characters find out they are really living in a MMO (but it does not blame the player for this). It is an interesting idea for sure, but it does not sound fun (at least) to me to play. Even I am a big fan of visual novels and adventure games, I for some reason never became interested in the Danganronpa franchise so I will pass on that one.

With all of that being said, I will check out To Your Eternity and provide any comments for that one. Where would you like to me to leave any comments I have for the article? I will also do some copy-edits, but I will leave very clear edit summaries and you can revert anything you disagree with. The basic concept (an immortal being who takes on multiple forms) reminds me of a Virginia Woolf book (Orlando: A Biography), but I bet a lot of people have used that idea in some way. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my current FAC, which is on a very (and I mean very) obscure sitcom. I understand if you do not have the time or interest, and I will still help out with To Your Eternity regardless. I hope you are having a great start to your week. Aoba47 (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A fellow user is also copyediting to your eternity so I guess the talk page would be good. Also, about the author of Eternity, she once wrote A Silent Voice, a manga about a dear girl and the consequences of bullying which sure gives her variety Tintor2 (talk) 18:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave my comments on the article talk page and will not do any copy-edits as I do not want to accidentally edit conflict anyone. Aoba47 (talk) 18:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I will likely leave comments tomorrow as it is already getting rather late where I am. Apologies for the delay with that. Aoba47 (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. By the way, do you know if the Fight Club novel was too different from the movie? I remember than in that Danganronpa game, a character briefly encountered the protagonist saying that he reminds him of a novel where the main character believed he was a good guy but ended up being the main villain instead, but he doesn't mention the actual book due to avoid spoiling him. In the game's ending, it is revealed that the main character was one of the main villains in the entire visual novel and I wondered if there are other books that play a similar twist.Tintor2 (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Fight Club book is quite different from the film (and I love both), but the main twist is the same. I am sure there are a lot of media that use this twist, particularly after the Fight Club movie, but I cannot think of any of the top of my head. Aoba47 (talk) 20:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danganronpa 2 became GA. I still haven't nominated To Your Eternity but by god that series actually made me cry (no kidding). Also, remember Akudama Drive? I've been expanding the article and found notes about how the series was primarily inspired by Reservoir Dogs while the ending was based on Leon: The Professional (Jean Reno and Natalie Portman). Still, I'm kinda confused in regards to what to do with the plot summary. Should it be placed in the episode list or in the plot section? I never worked in such a small series. Anyways, happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I would use the "Plot" section to provide an overview of the show's storylines and leave the more detailed aspects to the "Episodes" list. The list could be used to cover how the plot points are paced through the show from episode to episode. There will be cross-over, but that's how I normally worked it out. I hope this helps. Aoba47 (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FLCs

Hi Aoba47, hope you are well. In the past you have been kind enough to review some of my FLCs, and I was wondering whether you might have the time to look over one or other of the two I have up at the moment? If you are busy, don't worry, but if you had a few minutes spare then your comments would really be very much appreciated :-)

Kind regards, ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Thank you for your message. I will review one of your FLCs later today. I am pretty good. I hope you are doing well too! Aoba47 (talk) 14:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have supported both of your FLCs for promotion. I wish that I had something to comment about, but the lists look ready for promotion to me. My only comment would be to archive the citations as that will prevent future headaches. Aoba47 (talk) 16:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry example

Hi, I saw your recent post at User talk:SandyGeorgia about examples of articles on poetry collections.

I had look at featured and good articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Poetry and found

I hope that is useful. TSventon (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. I greatly appreciate the examples and they are very useful. I just did not want to be a pain for SandyGeorgia since she is already going through a lot right now. I would love to work on articles outside of my comfort zone, and poetry is definitely that for me. Even though I have a M.A. in English Literature, poetry was never my strong suit so I would like to do more research in that area. I will not be doing it anytime in the future as I already have a FAC up (and a second one lined up for after that), but I wanted to do some reading to have at least some understanding of what an article should look like. Thank you again and I hope you have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a list

Hi @Aoba47: I recently created a list "List of marches composed by John Philip Sousa", which I plan to nominate for FL. I have already made some changes per some suggestions by users. It would be helpful if you could take a look at the list and give some suggestions before the nomination. Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Thank you for the message. I will look through the list later this week. The only thing I notice right away is I'd encourage you to expand the caption for the lead image. The caption should mention that this is a painting and say when it was created to provide the full context to the reader. I do not really listen to this type of music (and I have never heard of this individual before) so hopefully I will be able to provide a truly outsider perspective. Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47 Done: I added some details regarding the painting in the caption. Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that the list is now a Featured List Candidate. Would appreciate your comments on the nomination page itself! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Candy (Foxy Brown song)

You can now nominate Candy (Foxy Brown song) for TFA if you wish. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the remainder. I will get on that momentarily. I hope you are having a great week so far! Aoba47 (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

You've gotten another FA! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My congratulations as well! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your review. The article looks a lot better because of it, particularly the "Critical reception" section. I was honestly uncertain about whether or not this article would work at the FAC level since the show is just so obscure, but I am so grateful to all the reviewers. I had a really positive experience with this one. Aoba47 (talk) 22:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Katie Joplin

Congratulations, Aoba47! The article you nominated, Katie Joplin, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more

In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money

Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release

Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report

Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way

News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia

Humour: Wikipedia's best articles on the world's strangest things

WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview

Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?

Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed

Obituary: SarahSV

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations \| July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,057	Dehradun (talk)	Add sources
104	Leo Wyatt (talk)	Add sources
16	Trust and Believe (talk)	Add sources
5	Paul Ruditis (talk)	Add sources
348	Footprints (poem) (talk)	Add sources
35	Persistence of Vision (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)	Add sources
2,978	Frozen II (talk)	Cleanup
83	Makin' Whoopee (talk)	Cleanup
15	Roy Young (musician) (talk)	Cleanup
6,768	COVID-19 pandemic in India (talk)	Expand
197	Cole Turner (talk)	Expand
4	String Theory: Cohesion (talk)	Expand
66	The Way It Is (Keyshia Cole album) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
56	Big Bad (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
675	Life imprisonment in the United States (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
22	Piano ballade (talk)	Merge
690	Space Oddity (talk)	Merge
93	Tagelmust (talk)	Merge
291	Sharman Macdonald (talk)	Wikify
62	Thor (band) (talk)	Wikify
43	Tattoo (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)	Wikify
22	Domio (talk)	Orphan
6	Poo Mu-chou (talk)	Orphan
24	Boba ice cream bar (talk)	Orphan
156	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
15	I Remember (Keyshia Cole song) (talk)	Stub
6	"Weird Al" Yankovic Live! (talk)	Stub
7	CHUD.com (talk)	Stub
2	Geetingsville, Indiana (talk)	Stub
17	Leland Crooke (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Girl (Confessions of a Shopaholic song) GA Reassessment

Bad Girl (Confessions of a Shopaholic song), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: Thank you for the message. I actually do not think that this song is even notable enough to even have its own article per WP:NSONG since the coverage on it seems rather limited and not significant. Aoba47 (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Thanks for your observation, astute as it is. The GA criteria does not scope to notability per se, as articles are supposed to have notability before they get to GA review. The only way we can refer to notability (obliquely) is through the "broad coverage" criteria, which is what is being done here. Thanks. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. The conversation about notability should probably be separate from the current GA Reassessment discussion as you are correct in that the GA criteria does not factor in notability. Apologies for bring up the notability aspect prematurely, but this does go into the "broad coverage" territory as you have already mentioned above. It was something that I had thought about during the move discussion back in early 2020. Aoba47 (talk) 22:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Candy (Foxy Brown song) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 21 August, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page if one has been posted. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time

Hi Aoba47, hope you are well. If you have time and only if you have time, I'd would be grateful if you could leave some comments here. Thank you. --Ashley yoursmile! 16:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashleyyoursmile: Thank you for the message. I will review the article and post comments before the end of the week. I am glad that you put this up for a peer review and I hope that it goes well and leads to a successful FAC this time. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my current peer review (about another music-related topic), but I completely understand if you do not have the time or the interest. I hope you are having a great week so far! Aoba47 (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Aoba47. Much appreciated. I will read through the article and try to comment on the PR on this weekend. Ashley yoursmile! 18:56, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 18:58, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAC suggestion

Hi! Hope you're doing well. If the topic's at all of interest to you, I'm trying to get a couple of eyes on an El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie FAC for the nominator, as a past FAC failed last year just because of lack of participation. No worries if you've not got the time. Thanks! — Bilorv (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. I will look over the article and post a review by the end of the week. This is an unpopular opinion, but I actually do not like Breaking Bad so hopefully my more outside perspective will be helpful to the FAC. It is always a shame to see a FAC fail because a lack of attention. Aoba47 (talk) 17:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. The show isn't to everyone's taste but it is always good to get reviews from people with a diversity of opinion. — Bilorv (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime. I am just glad that I can help whenever possible, especially given all the help that I receive with my FACs. Aoba47 (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To Your Eternity

The article To Your Eternity went GA! Thanks for the help. Now I'm planning bring either Darker than Black or Akudama Drive as GAs when their copyedit is finished. The former is a mixture between spy films (most importantnly 007) and ninja stories. I think I already told you about Akudama once as it's an action series made by the same writer as Danganronpa but focused more on tributes to many action films, most notably Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs. Happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 21:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on your recent GA. That is really awesome! Best of luck with both of your future GANs. One of these days, I will really have to watch these anime as they do sound really cool. I do have a weakness for spy stories. I do enjoy ninja stories as well, but I have honestly not gotten into that as much. It is always good to get a copy-edit. I stopped making GOCE requests a while back, but I started going there again, but it is always helpful at least in some way. Happy editing to you as well! Aoba47 (talk) 01:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Apologies for the ping, but I was wondering if you could help me with my current FAC? I know it is a super random question, but I thought I might as well ask. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 04:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. However, I'm kinda busy today so I'll comment later.Tintor2 (talk) 13:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Take as much time as you need. Aoba47 (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite Son (Star Trek: Voyager)

I've taken a long hard look at your work and learned from it and gotten ideas about what I could do better in other Star Trek episode articles. It is a substantially better put together article another {{Featured article}} These Are the Voyages... and it is a rare thing to see a Star Trek article of such high quality.

I am particularly interested to see if I can learn to use newspapers.com to take snippets about ratings information from newspaper such as the Los Angeles Times or USA Today. That could be very useful if I decide to edit more Deep Space Nine episode articles. I am aware that source access is not a requirement but it is so much better when editors or readers can easily verify or get more detail, that's a big part of why I made the effort to figure out the awkward and the interview from Marvin V Rush and also the Cinefantastique reference.[1] (Please note that I deliberately included the search text in the URL as it highlights the relevant part of the page to readers, and it is not session junk that the {{cite web}} documentation urges editors to remove from references.) I am frequently disappointed when inaccessible book sources don't include quoted text, and I'm left wondering if I've misunderstood the indented meaning.

Nonetheless I believe there's room for improvement even in Featured articles. Reading the text out loud will often make weaknesses in the prose more obvious. My brief experiences with Simple Wikipedia has taught me to think about word choices and sentences a lot more than most editors. Also I feel strongly that it is often unnecessary to explicitly name and date sources directly in the article text if it can be avoided. (For reviews it is usually necessary. If opinions have changed over time then maybe dates need to be emphasized, but usually not.) I'm hyper-aware of this and it is something I actively try to avoid because I mostly edit the lowest quality articles which fall into the trap of

In YYYY publication said "quote"
In YYYY publication said "quote"
In YYYY publication said "quote"

or pseudo-list paragraphs doing the same thing. I understand why you removed the Staff byline from the citation[2] but in principle I believe a generic staff byline is still better than an unknown "empty box" that might lead someone to think there might be an author but that I had neglected to fill it in.

If you'd like to critique my flawed efforts I'd be happy to have someone cast a critical eye over Carbon Creek (Star Trek: Enterprise). For example, I already know the intro needs a rewrite and there are bits I am reluctant to remove even though I should know better and there are parts I will probably need to rewrite but I've been staring at it too long and I'm less and less able to see the issues I'm sure still exist.

I thought it might be worth a more detailed explanation than the edit summary box allows but if you disagree with any of my changes I welcome further discussion on the article talk page. -- 109.79.169.58 (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and your kind words. I greatly appreciate the edits you have made to the article. No article on here is perfect, and you are absolutely right that even featured articles can still be improved upon. You might have already run across this, but I would encourage you to read this resource (Wikipedia:RECEPTION) as it is quite helpful. I prefer to not have a generic Staff byline as I do not think it is helpful. From my understanding, there is not an absolute rule either way on this as long as it stays consistent throughout the article.
It is always good to get multiple opinions. I will try to look through the "Carbon Creek" article in the near future. I know exactly what you mean as I have read over a lot of very (and I mean very) silly mistakes in articles that I have contributed to. Best of luck with editing and if you are interested in doing more work on Wikipedia, you might consider creating an account. It is not necessary so do not feel pressured to do so, but it could be helpful. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think understand your reasons and I'm not going to add the staff byline back in, I'm merely highlighting the difference between someone thinking that empty is equivalent to unknown, whereas a staff byline is generic but at least it is something non-zero. (I'm half waiting for the point in the future when someone comes along with a trained AI that can take the same inputs and write better articles.) There's some prose I could rewrite but I need to ruminate over the idea a bit longer to make sure I'm changing it for a good reason and not just because I prefer things done a certain way. I'm much more cautious about making changes to Featured articles but I don't think they're sacred or anything. I'm reasonably familiar with MOS:TVRECEPTION I had not read the essay at Wikipedia:RECEPTION specifically but I'm familiar with the ideas. There are times where I would include the sources in the text but only when absolutely necessary (it rarely seems necessary to highlight that a quote came in the form of a Twitter message). Even if comments from Cast or Crew are in the Reception section they still seem much more like Production and background information.

I abandoned my account a long time ago, the deletionists took a lot of the fun out of it. I never entirely stopped editing though, and I've had a lot of extra time indoors recently. I was never interested in barnstars anyway, and I think not having an account makes it easier to keep articles discussions on the relevant article Talk page. WP:WNCA is an essay about the benefits of not creating an account, I found it amusing, YMMV. Thanks for reading. -- 109.79.75.58 (talk) 02:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. It is always good to see how different editors use Wikipedia differently from one another. I can understand your rationale as well. I created the "Cast and crew response" subsection as I believe the cast and crew's opinions, which are all done after the episode, are separate from the episode's production. I do not really see a reason for merging this information into the larger "Production" section, but I would be more than happy to hear your opinion on it. It is important to open to change and to not get too attached. I was mostly trying to organize information in a way that would be the easiest for the reader to follow and would provide a sense of coherency throughout the article.
I agree that featured articles should never be viewed as sacred (as they are not by any means), but I am also cautious about making edits to them as I want to be as respectful to the original writers and editors and their work as possible. I think we differ somewhat as I do enjoy the community aspect of Wikipedia and I think having an account does help with that (although it is not entirely necessary). I have been fortunate enough to work with great editors that I can hopefully learn from so I can grow as an editor myself. I am sorry to hear about your experience with deletionists, but I am happy that you are editing in the way that best suits you. That is what really matters at the end of the day. Thank you for the conversation. Aoba47 (talk) 03:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red (Taylor Swift album) PR

Hello Aoba47, I have opened a peer review for Red prior to taking it to FAC. I am reaching out as you commented on Shake It Off's FAC. If you have the time and are willing, I would greatly appreciate any comment or advice that you could give at the review. If you are unable, that is totally fine as well. Thank you! --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Thank you for your message. I am currently doing a review for the peer review for the Bad Times at the El Royale article, but I will post comments for your peer review once I am done there. It will probably take some time though if I am being completely honest. I just started reviewing it today, and I prefer to only review one peer review at a time. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate any comments for my current review on Leah LaBelle, who is a fair, fair lesser-known singer than Taylor Swift. If you are unable, that is completely okay as well, and I would still be more than happy to help out with Red. It does make me miss HĐ, but I am glad that they are focusing more on what makes them happy. Aoba47 (talk) 02:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understandable and I will take a look. I miss HĐ as well. They were a powerhouse of content creation. What inspired me with Red specifically is that I did tell them I'd help get it through the hurdles, so I am doing that now after putting it off a couple months

. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I am looking forward to reading the article. I remember really enjoying the album when I listened to it in 2012 (although it makes a little depressed to think that was almost a decade ago at this point lol). I have a lot of respect for you for working on such a well-known album as that takes a lot of work and time. Best of luck with it! Aoba47 (talk) 02:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with Jeannie and Babu don't appear in Jellystone

I only did to know if in case they appear later, in any future Maurifran76 (talk) 00:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maurifran76: We should wait to see if they are confirmed to be in the series. They might not be in it at all so I would wait until we get confirmation from a source. When that happens, I would be more than happy to add the information back into the article. But, we should not add this kind of information to any article just in case they might appear, as we do not know that for a fact at this moment in time. Aoba47 (talk) 01:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Small question

In Darker than Black, the director explains he had multiple influences such as spy films, most especifically James Bond. Do you know recommending using a certain free image if possible?Tintor2 (talk) 12:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Thank you for the message. That is a good question. The article already has an image (File:Hokusai-sketches---hokusai-manga-vol6-crop.jpg) in its "Influences" section so I would either keep that one or replace it with another. I do not think the section is long enough to support two images, and the ninja image is already rather large anyway.
You know the material best so you would know what James Bond image would work best for the article. After reading the article, it seems like the inspiration is from the James Bond films, not the stories. Does Okamura specify which James Bond he was inspired by? The character was played by six different actors and each of their versions are quite different from one another. If he does not, then I would not add a James Bond image as there would not be enough information to include an appropriate image. I hope this response helps and let me know if you have any further questions. Best of luck with the article. Aoba47 (talk) 17:40, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't specify an specific James Bond though. The composer did say that she was given the task of themes from 70s so I am confused too. I removed the image. The director mentioned Sanpei Shinrato's ninja manga though but I couldn't find any other free image. Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 19:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. Since he does not specify which James Bond, I would err on the side of caution and not include a Bond image. I would not be surprised if they were inspired by general traits of the James Bond films as a whole so an image of any of the actors would not seem appropriate to me. I think it is a good idea to remove the ninja image if it is directly associate with the ninja manga being referenced. I do not think the article necessarily needs an image for either influence anyway as it can be conveyed through the prose alone and the article already has good images in other sections. Aoba47 (talk) 20:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica Clare

Well done on getting another FA with this! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Veronica Clare

Congratulations, Aoba47! The article you nominated, Veronica Clare, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 00:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting help with writing

Hello, Aoba47. Pardon my message, but I am a relative newcomer and wish to bring articles to FA-class. As you are an experienced editor with an impressive array of FAs, I wonder if I could get some consultation from you. My main area of editing so far has been popular music, and recently, I have nominated "State of Grace (song)" for GAN. If possible, I wonder if you could take a look at the article and advise on issues that need to improve i.e. prose, sourcing. If you feel it may take a considerable amount of time, please feel free to neglect this message. Pardon my abruptness again, and I hope you have a great weekend. Best, Ippantekina (talk) 10:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ippantekina: Thank you for the message. Unfortunately, I am unable to look at the article right now as I am currently wrapping up a FAC review and I just started a review for a peer review. However, when I am done with both, I will look through your article and provide comments on the article's talk page. Best of luck with the GAN! Aoba47 (talk) 19:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ippantekina: Apologies for the second ping. I just wanted to let you know I will still look through the article when I have the time. Congrats on the successful GAN. If you would like to bring this article through the FAC process, I would highly encourage you to do a peer review first as the jump from a GA to a FA is rather substantial, particularly for a first-time nominator, so it would be ideal to get feedback in a peer review setting first. Just wanted to give you that advice. Aoba47 (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice. I will put up the PR soon. Best, Ippantekina (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories

Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong

In the media: Larry is at it again

Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates

Recent research: Gender bias and statistical fallacies, disinformation and mutual intelligibility

Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki

News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department

Humour: A little verse

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
16	As If (American TV series) (talk)	Add sources
4,085	Scooby-Doo (talk)	Add sources
36	Wow (Kylie Minogue song) (talk)	Add sources
3,790	Pharrell Williams (talk)	Add sources
280	Narnia (world) (talk)	Add sources
154	Private message (talk)	Add sources
177	Ogie Alcasid (talk)	Cleanup
54	Panavision cameras (talk)	Cleanup
10,972	Bella Hadid (talk)	Cleanup
84	Marina Satti (talk)	Expand
5	The Snow Queen (video game) (talk)	Expand
2,753	Me Too movement (talk)	Expand
155	Malik Yusef (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24	Troels Brun Folmann (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
117	Geek show (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8	Ultimate Kylie (video) (talk)	Merge
63	Ultimate Kylie (talk)	Merge
31	Deplorable Word (talk)	Merge
186	Try This (talk)	Wikify
38	Kavita Rao (talk)	Wikify
3	Talent (comics) (talk)	Wikify
3	James Eike (talk)	Orphan
5	Katie Gately (talk)	Orphan
2	Ayoub El Yaghlane (talk)	Orphan
1,842	Tim Rozon (talk)	Stub
62	The Mumbly Cartoon Show (talk)	Stub
667	Lewis Pullman (talk)	Stub
2	Founders Escarpment (talk)	Stub
54	Jon Caramanica (talk)	Stub
15	Louie Ignacio (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Idiot FAC

Hi Aoba47! I wanted to let you know I have nominated Iggy Pop's The Idiot for FA status. When you have some free time I'd greatly appreciate any comments or concerns you might have :-) Thanks! – zmbro _(talk) 14:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zmbro: Thank you for the message. I am currently wrapping up a a peer review and have committed to another one, but I will try to get to your FAC in the near future. I am not sure if it matters or not, but if I am being honest, I have never heard any of Iggy Pop's music and I know nothing about him. Hopefully, that would be okay. I look forward to reading the article as I do enjoy your writing. Aoba47 (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Characterization and themes

Have you ever done these types of sections when writing character articles? I created Hei (Darker than Black)#Characterization and themes based on some analysis from different books and a university article. It's new territory for me so I don't know if certain parts are well organized. Also, something that confused me when writing this was the concept "posthuman noir" involving character writing among other examples like Deckard from Bladerunner. Seems like Wikipedia doesn't have such article.Tintor2 (talk) 23:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Thank you for your message. I will start with the second part. The phrase "posthuman noir" is not referencing a singular concept. Instead, it is actually referring to two different things (i.e. posthuman and film noir. Posthuman is a concept in science-fiction, and stories like Blade Runner have combined that with traditionally noir elements.

I do have experience with character articles with this type of section. Unfortunately, I just do not have the time to really read through the section from your article and provide any meaningful comments. I am already in the middle of doing multiple reviews for other editors, and after I am done with those, I am planning on taking a break from reviewing as I am feeling burnt out. Apologies for not being much help with that. Aoba47 (talk) 00:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Guess I'll remove the link of posthuman noir.Tintor2 (talk) 00:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense to me. Best of luck with the article! Aoba47 (talk) 01:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for being kind and helpful. Your feedback has been invaluable and helped to improve "Lights Up' to FA. Regards, Viridian Bovary (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Viridian Bovary: Great work with the article! I am glad that I could help. Aoba47 (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Thank you - and the many you named as helpful - today for Candy (Foxy Brown song), "about the third and final single from Foxy Brown's third studio album Broken Silence (2001). It was produced by the Neptunes duo Chad Hugo and Pharrell Williams, and their frequent collaborator Kelis performs the hook. The lyrics are about cunnilingus, with one music critic describing the song as "an ode to oral sex". "Candy" was well-received by critics during its release and in retrospective reviews, and is the subject of academic analysis for how it represents black female sexuality. Although the song often appeared on early 2000's soundtracks, it had limited commercial success, only reaching number 48 on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs Billboard chart."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your support for Mary Shelley appearing a second time. I liked yesterday's Main page, with 4 bolded names I brought there, all in memory: the TFA, the pictured DYK (Alfred Biolek), and two under Recent deaths, Siegfried Matthus and Teresa Żylis-Gara. August harvest. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the messages and the flowers. It was very nice to see everything on the main page, particularly the Shelley article. Aoba47 (talk) 21:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paint It Black nominated for FAC

Hi Aoba47! Paint It Black has now been nominated at FAC. If you have the time, would you be willing to take a look at it? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment. I will definitely look at it in the near future. I am currently wrapping up a review for a separate FAC (which should be completed shortly) and your FAC will be next in line. I am glad that you have put this up for a FAC and best of luck with it! Aoba47 (talk) 00:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries and thank you! :) --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Apologies for the ping, but I was wondering if you could help with my current FAC. It has already progressed rather far in terms of reviews at this point. I completely understand if you do not have the time or interest. Just wanted to ask. Aoba47 (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A query

Hi Aoba47, I hope you are well. I am happy to see that your current FAC has garnered several supports, and I enjoyed reading through the article. :) I wanted to ask your opinion on whether "Sweet Creature" has potential to become a FA. Apologies if this comes across as ridiculous, since the song has received relatively less media coverage being released only as an album track. However, I think the article covers almost everything about the song. That said, I'm unsure if it falls short of the comprehensive and the well-researched FA criteria, and I'd completely understand if it does. I'd really appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you and I hope you have a great day. --Viridian Bovary (talk) 09:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Viridian Bovary: Thank you for your message and kind words. I think any article has the potential to be a FA. Album tracks have been promoted to FA status, like "Missing My Baby", and I have even worked on an article on an album track in the FA/FAC space with "Drake Would Love Me". I do not think that specific part of the FA criteria would be an issue. You could always try doing a peer review before a FAC. I would be more than happy to provide comments for either a peer review or a FAC for the article. I hope that answered your question, but let me know if further clarification is needed. I think the article is in very good shape. I hope you are having a great day as well! Aoba47 (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice. I have opened a peer review now as I believe there is still plenty of room for improvement in prose and even coverage before I nominate it at FAC. I'd appreciate any comments that you would like to provide, if you have time. Thank you, and I hope you have a great day. Viridian Bovary (talk) 06:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck with the peer review. I am currently wrapping up a review for a FAC and I will look through your peer review when I am completed with that. Aoba47 (talk) 16:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mullum Malarum

Mullum Malarum has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:51, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Thank you for the message. I hope you are doing well. Is a GAR necessary for the article? Have editors raised concerns about this article's GA status? If not, then I do not think this process is entirely necessary, but that is just my opinion. I am sorry again about your disappointment with this article's FACs. I can tell you from experience that it can be very discouraging. Stay safe out there! Aoba47 (talk) 03:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Considering how much it has changed since the GA review, which was so long ago, it does need reassessment. I can share with you offline sources if you are interested. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. That makes more sense now that you have explained it to me. I will try my best to look through the article later this week. Aoba47 (talk) 19:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leah LaBelle

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Leah LaBelle has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the FA process when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:15, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 15:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban

In the media: Vive la différence!

Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year

Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs

News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia

Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage

WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview

Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan

Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of This Side of the Moon

Congratulations, Aoba47! The article you nominated, This Side of the Moon, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on another FA promotion, Aoba! Cook is lucky to have you as a fan.--N Ø 03:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words! I honestly wonder if any of the artists notice all the work people put into their Wikipedia articles lol. I hope you are doing well, and stay safe :) Aoba47 (talk) 03:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate any feedback

Hi Aoba! How are you? I hope you're well. It's been a super long time since my last one but I have prepared an article that I'd like to get feedback on before taking to FAC. Would you be able to look at it? I'd be extra appreciative, thank you! :-) Wikipedia:Peer review/I'm Goin' Down/archive1 Moisejp (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Moisejp: Hello again! I am always happy to hear from you. I will be more than happy to look through the article (and I will be more than happy to participate in its future FAC). I will post comments sometime over the weekend if that is okay with you. I am doing well. Thank you for asking. I am honestly surprised that it is already September. It feels like this year has just been speeding by (but that might just be me). How is everything with you? I hope you are doing well and staying safe. Aoba47 (talk) 04:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the year is speeding by and it's already September. :-) I'm glad you're well. I'm well too. I'm really looking forward to your feedback, thanks in advance! Moisejp (talk) 04:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad I'm not the only one that feels that way lol. I'm genuinely looking forward to reading the article as you always do great work on here, and I for whatever reason have a soft spot for song articles lol. Feel free to message me anytime. Aoba47 (talk) 04:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tumbling Dice PR

Hi Aoba47, I was wondering if you may be able to take a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/Tumbling Dice/archive4 and offer any feedback? I'd love to take "Tumbling Dice" to FA soon. If not, no worries. Thank you for your time. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Thank you for the message. I will be more than happy to look at the peer review. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my current FAC, but I understand if you do not have the time or interest. Stay safe! Aoba47 (talk) 02:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I know it needs some work, but looking for ideas and feedback. Gah! Thank you for the reminder on that. I meant to comment some time ago there but got sidetracked and forgot. Performed the image review for you

. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the image review. I honestly did not expect such fast response! I will look through the article now and post some comments in a few. Aoba47 (talk) 02:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Apologies it took me so long. Re Tumblin' Dice: thanks! --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]