Talk:Bad Girl (Confessions of a Shopaholic song)/GA2
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Instructions: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment
Observations
[edit]HTML document size: 102 kB Prose size (including all HTML code): 6633 B References (including all HTML code): 11 kB Wiki text: 8562 B Prose size (text only): 3964 B (690 words) "readable prose size" References (text only): 2822 B
- It is reasonably well written.
- Page has two infoboxes due two productions of this song (released) and (leaked) for this film. Infoboxes accepted.
- The lead provides a reasonable introduction.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Reference 1 is an archived purchase link on Amazon. (not admissible)
- Reference 2 is a play sample (Primary, not a proper reference)
- Reference 3 is about the leaked version of this song. (OK)
- Reference 4 is about the two versions of this song soundtrack and leaked version. (OK)
- Reference 5 is a review of all songs on the film - this song gets a mention. Is all. (mention, only)
- Reference 6 is a dead link. (About Rhianna chart history.)
Earwig copyvio check gives a 74% copyvio from this source.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- The references do not give a sufficiently broad coverage of this song track.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Opinions about two different recordings of this song by different groups are presented.
- There is criticism going each way in the references.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Page created 8 March 2012
- Page has 103 edits by 49 editors
- 90 day page views = 706 with a daily average of 8 page views
- Page obtained GA status 12 May 2012
- InternetArchiveBot has rescued two dead links;
- Page has been subject to a number of move discussions due participation by different artists.
- Page history shows stability, no edit warring observed
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Page has one image appropriately labelled and licensed.
- File:Pussycat Dolls w trasie koncertowej z Britney Spears.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.
- Notifying Editors:
- Page Creator Calvin999 notified;
- Editor Ser Amantio di Nicolao notified;
- Editor Status notified;
- Editor Razr Nation notified;
- Editor Wikipedian Penguin notified;
- Editor Aoba47 notified;
- A total of six involved editors were able to be notified.
- Overall:
There is a serious copy violation here which forms a major part of this article.- References do not provide a broad coverage.
- Discussion is opened to involved editors. Considered not to merit GA status at this review. --Whiteguru (talk) 13:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. The 74% copyvio source says: "Source: [2]. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- noted and struck out --Whiteguru (talk) 02:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)