Jump to content

User talk:Yintan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cleaning
No edit summary
Line 147: Line 147:


::My bad, your edit was correct. I've restored it, sorry about the mix up. [[User_talk:Yintan|<span style="color:Black">'''Yintan'''</span><span style="color:DarkRed"><s>'''²</s>&nbsp;'''</span>]] 08:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
::My bad, your edit was correct. I've restored it, sorry about the mix up. [[User_talk:Yintan|<span style="color:Black">'''Yintan'''</span><span style="color:DarkRed"><s>'''²</s>&nbsp;'''</span>]] 08:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Why don't you sod off, you Nazi twat?

Revision as of 13:21, 19 April 2013

- Please note: If you leave me a message here I'll answer it here. If I write on your Talk page I'll look for your answer there. -

Can I just say thank you for reverting those useless edits on that page? I'll warn you though, some of his "sources" are not accurate either so be aware lol again thanks. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 23:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Useless edits? And which sources are not accurate? Most were sourced, and you are one to talk about inaccurate sources. Only unsourced portions should be reverted. Have a little bit of respect, 'Brotha'.208.69.244.9 (talk) 04:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you guys should argue about the sources on the article's Talkpage(?) Yintan²  08:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to get them to do it but they don't follow the rules. ;) Anyways, as an encyclopedia entry, I didn't feel some of the information was too necessary if people wanted to know Little Richard on a casual sense. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 13:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Elderberry Reference

Ok, under 'Research evidence' the "FOR EXAMPLE" says Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo made this following claim:

'his claim that elderberry can be used as a remedy for the common flu lacks scientific evidence and may be misleading'.

which there is no reference to the source of this quote which is said to be claimed by Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo, which I have counted that claim with facts from The Eat right 4 your type Complete blood type Encyclopedia Copyrighted 2002 by Hoop-A-Joop on page 539 under Fruit/Fruit Juice you will find Elderberry (Dark Blue/Purple): which reads in the book...

Elderberry (Dark Blue/Purple):

Group A: Neuteral, Non-Secretor Variant: BENEFICIAL Group B: Neuteral, Non-Secretor Variant: BENEFICIAL Group AB: Neuteral, Non-Secretor Variant: BENEFICIAL Group O: Neuteral

There is no denotes in any of the groups that mention any of the Blood groups if they consume Elderberry's that there is a direct link to preventing the Common Flu other than BENEFICIAL, as to how elderberry are BENEFICIAL isn't put into details but BENEFICIAL means that particular food is good for you and helps you body which just a note a human can consume allot of food that is said to help prevent the Common Flu take an Orange and it peel for example. which is noted in the book which you just may want to buy a copy for a reference seeing your managing this stub because it can be found on page 541.

Orange/ Orange Juice..

Group A: Avoid: Increases Polyamine or indican levels; inhibits proper gastric function or blocks assimilation.

Group B: NEUTRAL Group AB: Avoid: Increases polyamine or indican levels. Group 0: Avoid: Increases polyamine or indican levels; metabolic inhibitor.

Want to know about, lets say chicken soup, I can look that up also but with out a direct reference to the claim that is being said that Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo made the claim, and the claim was 'his claim that elderberry can be used as a remedy for the common flu lacks scientific evidence and may be misleading' is unsupported and not factual.

Like many claims I have read on Cellular Nutrition (<- get that hint real quick) are not factual also, but in this case for this stub it will become factual and less one sided and over opinionated, and you might want to revert my edit back for it doesn't show the unsupported reference, unless you want the open source wikipedia to only show unsupported references, which isn't allowed just to let you know you have to show a reference.

If it doesn't have a reference then it is hearsay and it isn't allowed on Wikipedia, period.

here's another that will be soon deleted just to give you a heads up..

"There is a lack of scientific evidence supporting the associations between disease states and ABO blood types as mentioned on (Dr.)Peter D'Adamo's website.[16] A search of PubMed under the author's name does not yield any peer-reviewed articles with data to support his claims."

There could be a reason for the above error because all the medical references that are noted in the Eat right 4 your type Complete blood type Encyclopedia Copyrighted 2002 by Hoop-A-Joop that was written by Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo are not on PubMed and the references used are not written by Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo, as noted in the USERS GUIDE page XVII -Scientific References- which reads:

"There are hundreds of scientific study references throughout the encyclopedia, appearing at the END OF EACH SECTION. Most of the articles cited may be accessed through Medscape's MEDLINE service www.medscape.com., you do have the book right?

which if you want me to go into a rant about the lack of scientific evidence, it is overly apparent you HAVEN'T READ THE BOOK and your written a 'review' about the title you haven't read and you editing who, me?..get real I have the book right here in front of me and you should by one.

[1]

Timeholder (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One, I have no idea what you are talking about,
two, all I did was remove your usersignature from the article, as you can see here [1]
three, next time you leave a message here, please don't overwrite other people's texts. Yintan²  07:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


on #3 I didn't knowingly remove anyone else text other than what I was trying to add which in doing so I made a mistake and then changed what I did when I saw it was wrong, which when doing so what was added to my mistake 'the who r u ' comment I erased which wasn't done with malice intent, navigating this <text editor> is like riding the 6,000 pound elephant in the china shop. sorry.Timeholder (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who I am

Who I am
Don't judge me about who I am Meerahboo05 (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm not following you at all. Care to enlighten me? Yintan²  08:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So who was he??? Basket Feudalist 10:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Abdi

Hello Yintan, Can you please delete Prince Abdi article as the information on Wikipedia is not accurate. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.122.48 (talk) 00:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks fine to me but if you think it should be deleted you can list it at WP:AFD. Yintan²  08:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2.222.122.48 you have repeatedly been asked to bring any issues of contention to this talk page, instead of wiping the article. As has been posted on your talk page, the subject of the article, may deal directly with the Wikipedia Foundation and request that inaccurate article material is altered or removed. See WP:OTRS. The material given in the article is referenced. Changes cannot be made to inaccurate details unless there is, somewhere, a process of discussion either on an editor talk page, the article talk page or with the Wikipedia Foundation. You've blanked the Prince Abdi article eight times without saying what's wrong with it or commenting on the talk page. If you continue to remove material without giving specific reason, you may be blocked. Span (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Italian Prime Ministers

There has been officially any second Republic in Italy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.19.234.201 (talk) 09:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's better to discuss that on the article's Talk page before you start removing all mentions of it from the article. Could save you a lot of work ;-) Yintan²  09:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bugatti Veyron

yes I did explain, check the link -.- http://jalopnik.com/bugatti-veyron-super-sport-stripped-of-worlds-fastest-470992327 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.130.246.118 (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing two paragraphs without explanation and dumping a link at the bottom of the page[2] is not how it works. Yintan²  10:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian American page citation

Hi, thanks for that. I have edited this page before, however I have never referenced as I did not know how. I did notice that reference [6](new York times) would be sufficient for the Coptic majority in the US claim, found in the religion section. I'm sorry but I'm just learning now how to reference and i did put the wrong one by accident, although I think I have fixed it now. I'm going to attempt to add a new reference but don't worry if I do make any mistakes as I will fix them before I leave.

No problem. Have you tried using the 'preview' button? That could prevent some unpleasant surprises. Yintan²  17:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Britishness Article

Yes I removed the content because if you read it, it has little to do with the British identity in Scotland, just Scottish separatist propaganda, if you also read the titles, they both conflict with each other as they both have "politics" within the actual information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.184.106 (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to discuss such big deletions on the article's Talk page first. Yintan²  16:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Atlantic Ocean

Dear Yintan,

You wrote:

"Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Atlantic Ocean, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "

I don't know how else to leave you a message on this page other than editing it.

The only reason I edited the Atlantic Ocean page was to make a point to someone that Wikipedia is unreliable as a source for information. This is because anyone and everyone can edit it to say anything at all, with no expert knowledge or research necessary.

Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.31.191 (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I can prove that glass can break by smashing your windows. That's no reason to do it, though. Yintan²  08:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Dennis article

Hi, I edited the Lawrence Dennis article because the line in question: "He advocated that capitalism in America after the Great Depression, arguing that capitalism was doomed." .. seemed to me a grammatical and logical absurdity. Also, Lawrence Dennis is quite clearly a fascist and anti-capitalist, from what I understand.

By digging around a bit in the history of the page, I found that for the vast majority of its existence, the first instance of "that capitalism" in the sentence was some formulation of "fascism" or "Social fascism". It was only recently changed (i.e. in the third last edit before mine), with no explanation - again, to what seemed like an absurdity. I invite you to examine it the same way I did, and see if you agree.

50.100.175.250 (talk) 03:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, your edit was correct. I've restored it, sorry about the mix up. Yintan²  08:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you sod off, you Nazi twat?

  1. ^ Eat right 4 your type Complete blood type Encyclopedia Copyrighted 2002 by Hoop-A-Joop twritten by Dr. Peter J. D'Adamo