User:Lazulilasher/toolbox
Here are some things I use a lot. I stole a lot of this from Ruhrfisch & Finetooth.
Links
[edit]- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps
- map templates and sources
- Census Bureau Maps
- Citation templates
- Commons
- WP:MOS
- WP:MOSNUM
- WP:PR
- MOS talk
- Template: Convert
- Link checker
- Load-Time Tool
- article hits counter
- Template messages
- Latitude-longitude conversions
- Infobox templates
- Canadian Geographical Names Database
- Environment Canada water survey
- AndyZ suggestions
- Epbr123 suggestions
- User:Ealdgyth/GA review cheatsheet
- link-removal script explanation
- VeblenBot peer review list
- User:Finetooth/monobook.js
- RS in review process
- Free images in content review process
- dabfinder
- Wayback machine
- Contributor tool
- readability tool
- seeking photo permission
- citation bot
- WP:RFA
- WP:LEAD
- WP:BUNCH
- WP:ATT
- WP:LAYOUT
- WP:PUMP
- WP:ARCHIVE
- WP:FAC
- WP:FACR
- WP:FAR
- WP:GACR
- WP:GAN
- WP:NBSP
- WP:AIV
- WP:BARN
- WP:BYC
- WP:SUMMARY
- WP:DEADLINK
- WP:RIVERS
- WP:GA
- WP:FA
- WP:V
- WP:CITE
- WP:FAIR USE
- WP:FL
- Template Messages
- Wikipedia:SPI/AI
- WP:SPI
| RfB candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barkeep49 | 114 | 0 | 4 | 100 | Open | 14:19, 7 March 2025 | 5 days, 18 hours | no | report |
 |
|---|
| 27 February 2025 |
|
- A request for bureaucratship is open for discussion.
- Banning AI-generated images in articles
- Future administrator elections
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 66.66.76.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 491 five times in the last 5 minutes (Edits ending with emoticons or !, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Novvannak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. with exception of excessive posting of YouTube links, which I do not think has been flagged by a filter. Peaceray (talk) 18:49, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- 2409:4060:2d11:62::a74b:6e07 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- BS102030 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- 78.172.86.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Filter 249 reporting
New user conducting large scale reverts.
Filter 1055 reportingUnusual user talk page activity
. Although the filter is operating as intended, this IP is properly reverting block evasion by User:MidAtlanticBaby. Peaceray (talk) 19:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- 81.179.216.244 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- 47.225.222.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 30 five times in the last 5 minutes (Large deletion from article by new editors, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 89.153.250.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Noga: account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. TheM1sty (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- 2409:4060:2D11:62:0:0:A74B:6E07 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. TheM1sty (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- RegisteredCorrcetor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent vandalism. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- 49.207.200.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Star Sports (India): Changing contents, and adding Unsourced contents, which have no connections to each other. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- BenHopkins02 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. editing tests, namely fooling around with bolding certain entries. It's particularly concerning with their edits at 97th Academy Awards, which makes it look like they are designating a winner a full day before the ceremony. CRBoyer 19:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 23 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 17 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Antiracistfactchecker (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- The username is anti-racist. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Limecuck (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pukebrain (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Angel-gabriels-blessedartthoughamongwomen-syringe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TrustmeIknowsomethingyoudont (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Iamaearly2000sfanneverblocked (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- IEditDuringLunch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: ledltdurlnglunch" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Dafendlynotnoob (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit] | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High traffic, important page. Occasional vandalism too. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP block evasion. Please see 99.46.139.248, 2600:1700:489:2670:0:0:0:0/64, and (currently) 2603:3024:1258:E200:0:0:0:0/64.
I would also suggest that in addition, their other targets, being What a Cartoon! and The Patrick Star Show, be protected as well. Magitroopa (talk) 01:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: In order to handle obviously bad faith contributions from new or unregistered users without deterring good faith ones. BangJan1999 01:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:CT/EE and WP:CT/AP clashed. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A short-term protection would be helpful as there is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the subject's name and gender. FMSky (talk) 01:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit-warring. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 02:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistant replacement of overly large episode summaries with MOS:SEAOFBLUE overlinking. Multiple IPs, likely same editor. Adakiko (talk) 03:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥ 论 04:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High IP Vandalism. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 06:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent edit waring - removal of content w/o explanation. Adakiko (talk) 07:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep removing the logo. Vestrian24Bio 07:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP disruptive editing and edit-warring. Jingiby (talk) 09:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: source and content deletion by muliple IPs, likely socks. Adakiko (talk) 09:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nationalists keep on changing the name as they did since forever 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nationalism at its peak 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Really required. Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 15:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: some users are editing every time that the International Police Organization is affiliated with far right extremist without any prof and is hurting verry much the image of the organization . We can bring a lot of proof of our activities that are for helping people in cybersecurity and cyberbullying Stoica Alexandru Adrian (talk) 11:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Ironically I kind of agree, increasing protection would stop sockpuppets affiliated with the organization like Stoica above from continuing to edit war. signed, Rosguill talk 13:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Canadien1867 (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Userpage of deceased user. M.C. (talk) 13:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreation of Lucky Ekeh with "ekeh" in lower case to circumvent Lucky Ekeh being Indef EC Salt. This was created by a bunch of User:Nenub socks. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of disruption and unsourced content. Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 15:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- October 2024 Palestinian Authority operation in Tubas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:35, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:35, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Offline forum involving Iranian vs. Turkey editors, fighting over who "won" this battle, has created continued disruption. GreenC 16:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors, as well as MOS:TV violation. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/KURD. Also addition of uncited claim. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 16:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, persistent adding of dates not supported by the given sources. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page has faced a lot of vandalism in recent days, both from users and IP editors. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Previous one-month protection expired two weeks ago. Vandals are again inserting "he's the greatest". Usually once per day, but several times today. — Chrisahn (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Turkish IP user who admitted to evading a block is repeatedly adding unnecessary templates despite warnings. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 18:59, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism from [2a02:c7c:515e:5d00:7062:b4e:6222:1218] Last known good version is https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Earl_Hebner&oldid=1257998503 I manually edited it back to the same, but that may get reverted or edited before WPP takes effect. 98.97.154.225 (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Remove Indefinitely Extended Confirmed Protection: Persistent Vandalism – The protection is no longer necessary because it has no edit auto confirmed user it has no vandalism for a long time but we wanna test if the protection is still needed but first test unprotected if it works if not then we will go back to extended confirmed protection it has no restriction at Arbitration enforcement is been a while since November 19, 2017 give a try first if not then we will go back to protection test it see if it works. 2603:7000:8100:29F1:1F8B:77CB:AD52:38FB (talk) 08:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
[[Cyberbot I]] I know it is protected but I'm trying to decreased by lifting the protection we will leave to administrator. 2603:7000:8100:29F1:1F8B:77CB:AD52:38FB (talk) 08:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Kendricks personal life tab was recently edited. The last person to edit was Saloni Jain22 as of now (5 hours ago). The incorrect information is under his personal life tab. "In an October 2012 interview, he stated that he once tried marijuana, but the blunt was laced with PCP". The drug last started is incorrect and should be replaced with "angel dust" or more commonly known as, cocaine. The link that is attached is a YouTube video with kendrick literally stating verbatim. he has also referenced this is two songs on his GOOD Kid MAAD city album. Once at the end of "Peer Pressure" and again in m.a.a.d city he refers to it making him "foam at the mouth". You're welcome 2601:98D:C182:7000:6040:86B0:1916:8063 (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: PCP is angel dust. Worgisbor (Talking's fun!) 22:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:49, 1 March 2025 (UTC) |
| 15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- @C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- GanzKnusper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- AmateurHi$torian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Good quality and appropriately sourced articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Paradoxodarap (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request AutoPatrolled rights. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since December 2020, with over 1,090 total edits (945 live edits) and 154 articles created (121 currently live).
Reasons for requesting AutoPatrolled rights:
- Experience in article creation: I have created numerous articles that meet Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and neutrality guidelines.
- Understanding of Wikipedia policies: As an Extended Confirmed User, I follow Wikipedia’s Manual of Style, Cite Sources, and Notability Guidelines.
- Reducing admin workload: Granting AutoPatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog for New Page Patrollers, as my articles generally do not require manual review.
- Clean track record: I have never been blocked and maintain a history of constructive contributions.
I appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- VortexPhantom (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
*Request for Auto-Patrolled Rights* 
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I am requesting *auto-patrolled rights* to streamline my contributions. Over the past month, I have actively edited Wikipedia, focusing on *Politics, Infrastructure, and Technology in India*.
With 100+ constructive edits, I have developed a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s policies and formatting. Granting me *autopatrolled status* 
will help improve efficiency by reducing manual reviews. As there are not any specific requirements for autopatrolled right, I think I am suitable for this right.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards, VortexPhantom (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done. User:VortexPhantom The expectation is to have created 25 articles without any significant problems for autopatrolled, which you are quite far from at the moment. Please ensure you read the requirements before requesting permissions. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't saw that before, thanks, not be repeated next time. VortexPhantom (talk) 11:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- MaplesyrupSushi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Great editor, with high quality articles.Has written 32 live articles. Xiphoid Vigour ⚔Duel⚔ 15:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hwqaksd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 90 articles, of which 81 are above stub-class and none deleted (to my recollection).
I was previously denied autopatrolled permissions for not having enough articles that didn't go through AfC; I've since created 14 articles without utilizing it. Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- Czerniawskimc (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I will need the rights so I can attempt to make changes in semi-protected articles and I think my situation is a little different. After many years of use without contribution I've decided to contribute and take care of some outdated images and animations (I'm a 2D/3D Generalist). I do not plan to edit any other content, including text - unless it's necessary for some reason, like a description that has to be updated. I plan to start with English articles first, even though it's not my native language. I will just take care of the pictures, but I would have to make 10 of them, according to the rules I've read, and if the YouTube video I watched on the subject is right, I would have to do it in a quick succession (7 days according to "Wikipedia Basics" - "The Boring Voice" channel). It's not possible for me, I'm sorry. The plan is to take care of the most popular articles, but with very outdated images. They are stuck there because there are no free-to-use alternatives or nobody cares enough to update them. I would like to replace them with custom made images released for free for everyone via Wikimedia. I'm somewhat familiar with copyright laws and I understand some of the updates might not be welcome or rejected and that's okay. Images will still be available on Wikimedia in multiple sizes, formats and versions - depending on what is being done. Then I can try updating something else, but I need to be sure I'm somewhat ready to start and have a green light. I don't want to worry if what I'm working on is going to be rejected by an automated message. I also don't want to feel like I cheat and force myself to make 10 careless updates. I will get burnt out. I understand it's also a learning process and proof that someone understands the basics of coding, formatting and is not malicious (at least not yet), but I will do my best to research and test things before making any changes. Creating 3D renders takes time and I will also be limited by my tools and the resources I purchased, all with different licenses. I still have a lot to read and get familiar with, but it's okay. There is time. And I know this account looks fishy and I haven't logged in for 16 years, but the name change ticket went surprisingly well, even though I probably missed a few checkmarks. If for whatever reason this request has to be denied (and I know "the vast majority of requests here are denied" and I know about "WP:FFU"), then it's okay and I will do the next suggested thing ("Template:Edit semi-protected"). I'm happy the wall exists, but unhappy it has to. Thank you for your time. Czerniawskimc (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think I made a mistake and I was looking at those 10 changes the wrong way. They don't have to be big changes. I think I might have some expertise in certain subjects and I can contribute a little here and there, in unpopular but still outdated articles that don't require any special permissions to edit. Just look at the "3D_rendering" page, it's filled with pictures from 2005 and a lot of information is missing. I will try to contribute something there. I don't know if I can close this ticket, and I'm generally still open to getting "confirmed", but like I mentioned in my previous post - I know I have other solutions and I just realized I can just deal with it and simply follow the rules. I used the word "force" before, but nothing is forced here, nobody is forcing me to do anything and those changes don't have to be "careless", which is another stupid thing I said. Czerniawskimc (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - @Czerniawskimc According to WP:AUTOCONFIRM, it doesn't say anything about the fact that you have to make the edits in "quick succession". Can you link that YouTube video that you talked about? Like you said, this probably will get declined. Justjourney (talk) 01:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for the confusion. It's a wall of text, and I replied to myself before anyone else could.
- It all comes down to what I wrote in my first message: "I will just take care of the pictures, but I would have to make 10 of them, according to the rules I've read, and if the YouTube video I watched on the subject is right, I would have to do it in a quick succession (7 days according to "Wikipedia Basics" - "The Boring Voice" channel)."
- After getting familiar with the rules, I knew I had to make 10 edits, and I would have to replace 10 images (based on my previous "image-related contribution scenario"). I also knew there was a possibility that this 7-day time limit exists if the video I mentioned is correct. Just like you, I didn’t notice it mentioned on WP:AUTOCONFIRM, so I was skeptical. Since you asked for the link, I will go ahead and assume it's okay to post it. And I just noticed I can't post a timestamped link, so I suggest skipping to 0min25sec and here is the URL: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfR9gAMZzzM).
- If this gets declined, it's alright. I just made my first edit ever a few minutes ago, in text, and it was rather bold. Whole new lead section on path tracing with respect to some of the previous content. But the images are on the way - I even got one of the top CGI artists in the world involved and he agreed to release a shaderball model for me (us) via Wikimedia Commons so I can alter it, share it and use in many images I plan to create. We were taking care of the consent declaration today. To sum it up, I will probably end up in autoconfirmed group eventually and it's not an obstacle at the moment. It's almost 7am and bright outside, so it's time to go to sleep. Thank you for your time and good night. Czerniawskimc (talk) 06:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Czerniawskimc: that video appears to be quite wrong. There are two requirements for autoconfirmed:
- Your account must be at least four days old (you meet this already as your account is years old)
- You must make a total of 10 edits (you're currently on 7 edits)
- These two conditions are independent from each other, so you just need to hit them both. You're nearly there already. On the assumption you reply to this post again and make two {{edit semi-protected}} requests, you'll be there. It's far less onerous than you seem to think. You also mentioned WP:FFU - this is an option for you at the moment without autoconfirmed status, but that should only be used for irreplaceable non-free files. It sounds like you'll be making freely licenced files that you can upload to Wikimedia Commons without autoconfirmed status.
- I'll mark this as Not done for now as you'll likely hit autoconfirmed sooner than you think. stwalkerster (talk) 12:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Czerniawskimc: that video appears to be quite wrong. There are two requirements for autoconfirmed:
- 88BeeGee88 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
It has been four days and I've made 13 edits and I haven't been confirmed yet? 88BeeGee88 (talk) 06:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Not done. Your account was created on 26 February 2025 at 21:09 (UTC). It will become autoconfirmed exactly 4 days after that time, which will be 2 March 2025 at 21:09 (UTC). Mz7 (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- Abo Yemen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I meet the basic guidelines for the permission and I think that I have a good history of RM participation and it would be nice to try and help out with something new. I don't have much to say in my head but feel free to ask questions! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Vellutis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thorn6130 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- AgerJoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoy 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Xiphoid Vigour (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 09:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. I would like to be able to confirm these requests as I think that it would just be another way for me to be helpful. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- WormEater13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been a active contributor to Wikipedia for quite a few months now, actively editing and creating articles related to Texas politicians. I'm also well aware about the Wikipedia policy on vandalism. I see a lot of requests on articles that I edit miscellaneously in my free time, however I don't have the permission. WormEater13 (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 22:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Royiswariii (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting for Pending changes reviewer, I've been familiarized all the guidlines like WP:NPOV, WP:!, WP:OR, WP:VERI and WP:BLP. I have a rollback and using that to fight vandalism in Wikipedia. ROY is WAR Talk! 14:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Danoniinho (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm requesting Pending Changes Reviewer status so I can help speed up and decrease the number of pending changes to articles. I know the rules about vandalism, verifiability, editing guidelines, and everything else. Danoniinho (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Svartava (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to have my rights restored as I am interested in countervandalism and patrolling again. I had myself requested removal at [5]. Thanks. Svartava (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Paradoxodarap (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request **Pending Changes Reviewer** rights. I have been an active editor since December 2020, with **1,094 total edits** (945 live). In the past year, I have made **345 edits**, primarily contributing to content creation, sourcing, and maintenance. I have created **154 articles** (121 currently live), ensuring compliance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. I am familiar with **WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,** and other core policies. I aim to help review pending changes on semi-protected pages to ensure accuracy and reliability. Thank you for your time and consideration! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Stranger43286 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. I'm Stranger43286. I has made 1000+ edits and reverted many vandalism. Pending Changes Reviewer rights might be helpful for me. RealStranger43286 (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- HerBauhaus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I've been an active contributor to Wikipedia, focusing on improving article quality, maintaining neutrality, and adding reliable citations. I'm well versed in core policies (NPOV, Verifiability, NOR) and understand the importance of pending changes. As someone who values data integrity in open-access knowledge, I prioritize accuracy and well-sourced content. One of my objectives is to help keep Wikipedia factual and trustworthy. HerBauhaus (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- QalasQalas (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- @QalasQalas: what would you use rollback for? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- AntiVandalism as you see this Edit and Edit2 new users vandlized account which why i need roll thanks. QalasQalas (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Coining (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- SportscarFan2004 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oostpulus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 80 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 09:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Gelasin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been actively Recent Changes patrolling for a little over three months now. I've read WP:Rollback. I would like to try out Huggle for use in fighting vandalism, and I pledge to follow the rollback guidelines. I recognize that the primary use of rollback is to revert vandalism. Gelasin (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Parksfan1955 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Would like to obtain rollback rights to use AntiVandal, as patrolling recent changes traditionally can get unorganized with a massive amount of tabs very quickly. I have been patrolling recent changes for around 2 years. Parksfan1955 (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- YuiFujimoto (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am continuously patrolling recent changes and fighting against anti-vandalism. I hope this right and the tools available with the permission will help me to do more anti-vandal work more effectively. I will not abuse this tool and use it civilly and won't do edit warring and 3RR violations. YuiFujimoto (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @YuiFujimoto Not done for now; you shouldn't be making reverts like Special:Diff/1277207503 without an explanation. Likewise with Special:Diff/1277264503, where you labeled a good-faith edit as vandalism. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- E6400 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am kindly requesting rollback permissions for myself, in order to revert vandalism using the Huggle tool. E6400 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I requested for this right a few weeks ago, which MusikBot will flag up. The reason I was declined was mainly because I had not met the 200 mainspace edit threshold needed for my application to go through. A concern was also raised about one of my edits, saying that I had jumped to conclusions about an editor a bit quickly and had gone too fast with the warnings. I am now trying to be better at using the warning system more fairly and helpfully and I hope that I have addressed this concern. Most of my edits on Wikipedia have been fighting against vandalism and with this tool, I will be able to fight it more efficiently. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 17:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- If it helps, I'd like to vouch for ScrabbleTiles. They've proved to be a good user, and I doubt that they would misuse either of the requested permissions.(Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 16:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- United Blasters (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm requesting rollback rights to enhance my ability to fight vandalism. I Would like to try out AntiVandal tool. I'm active in recent changes, pending changes, and new pages patrol, and I understand rollback is for clear vandalism cases. I'll use it responsibly. Here is my Undo/Revert History : [7] UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Cactusisme (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have made many reverts using undo and I use SWviewer/Twinkle to revert vandalism (see this to see my reverts). I understand the policies of rollback and have thoroughly read through the rollback policies and guidlines. I hope that I would receive the rights (permenant or for a probation period).— Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Acer-the-Protogen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I spend a good deal of time on RecentChanges, and edit on PC as well as mobile (mostly mobile). RedWarn does not work on mobile, and Twinkle can give me trouble sometimes. As such, I'm requesting rights so that mobile editing is a little easier for me. Thank you! 🙂 (NOTE: Forgot to add that rollback seems to be faster than Twinkle. That would be useful.) (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 20:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- WikiMentor01 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I usually manual revert edits and undo revisions, particularly in Nepal-related articles, where vandalism is more common. Having rollback rights would help me efficiently maintain the accuracy and quality of these pages. WikiMentor01 (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Swoonfed (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been editing on Wikipedia since May 2024, and often times see IP accounts or newly created accounts cause disruption, vandalism or spread misinformation across vital articles. I have to manually revert their edits most of the times. Since I have been working on improving and expanding a few high exposure articles, I believe rollback rights would give me a large boost in handling vandalism. Swoonfed (Ping) 14:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links