User:Lazulilasher/toolbox
Here are some things I use a lot. I stole a lot of this from Ruhrfisch & Finetooth.
Links
[edit]- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps
- map templates and sources
- Census Bureau Maps
- Citation templates
- Commons
- WP:MOS
- WP:MOSNUM
- WP:PR
- MOS talk
- Template: Convert
- Link checker
- Load-Time Tool
- article hits counter
- Template messages
- Latitude-longitude conversions
- Infobox templates
- Canadian Geographical Names Database
- Environment Canada water survey
- AndyZ suggestions
- Epbr123 suggestions
- User:Ealdgyth/GA review cheatsheet
- link-removal script explanation
- VeblenBot peer review list
- User:Finetooth/monobook.js
- RS in review process
- Free images in content review process
- dabfinder
- Wayback machine
- Contributor tool
- readability tool
- seeking photo permission
- citation bot
- WP:RFA
- WP:LEAD
- WP:BUNCH
- WP:ATT
- WP:LAYOUT
- WP:PUMP
- WP:ARCHIVE
- WP:FAC
- WP:FACR
- WP:FAR
- WP:GACR
- WP:GAN
- WP:NBSP
- WP:AIV
- WP:BARN
- WP:BYC
- WP:SUMMARY
- WP:DEADLINK
- WP:RIVERS
- WP:GA
- WP:FA
- WP:V
- WP:CITE
- WP:FAIR USE
- WP:FL
- Template Messages
- Wikipedia:SPI/AI
- WP:SPI
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significa liberdade | 127 | 20 | 7 | 86 | Open | 22:18, 21 September 2024 | 2 days, 12 hours | no | report |
 |
|---|
| 4 September 2024 |
|
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 129.205.24.143 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Schnitzlebang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 47.223.76.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 80.103.137.225 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Pixel 9 (diff): Repeated edit-warring on Pixel 9 and now iPhone 15 despite multiple warnings, ignoring WP:STATUSQUO and misinterpreting policies such as NPOV and "consensus". Disputed material is in clear violation of various policies, and there is rough consensus from multiple editors on the talk page against its inclusion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Bundling 90.167.202.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) as well, clearly the same user. Perhaps a rangeblock. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 167.98.65.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On An Yu-jin (diff): vandalism after final warning. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 4 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 3 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 11 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 18 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
User-reported
[edit]- PizzaTowerHistory (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user page; refers to the history of a video game called "Pizza tower". Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced it's promotional. It's a very narrow special interest but in principle it's no different to someone interested in the history of railways calling themselves "RailwayHistory" and writing an outline draft article on their user page. WaggersTALK 08:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting, I see now that Pizza Tower has its own article. I thought the account was trying to promote their own game but that is almost surely not true. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced it's promotional. It's a very narrow special interest but in principle it's no different to someone interested in the history of railways calling themselves "RailwayHistory" and writing an outline draft article on their user page. WaggersTALK 08:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Political article that appears to have had biased information on it. Moreover, the article appears ripe for an edit war and paid writers on it could be possible. Holyapple25 (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Over the last fortnight the page has been the subject of various attempts to introduce unsourced promo material "as directed by Dr.José-Alain Sahel" and "on Jose-Alain Sahel's request". Axad12 (talk) 06:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- A quick question... Could you indicate for me where in the link provided it clarifies the level of disruptive activity required to justify protection. If so I will take this on board for future consideration. Many thanks, Axad12 (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Axad12: I would suggest starting with WP:PREEMPTIVE and WP:SEMI. The last disruptive edit was 6 days ago which is is not especially recent. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) In general, see our protection policy. But every case is different, and administrators may use their discretion on a case-by-case basis. See Bathos as an example for the level of disruption which has led to semi-protection, e.g. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- A quick question... Could you indicate for me where in the link provided it clarifies the level of disruptive activity required to justify protection. If so I will take this on board for future consideration. Many thanks, Axad12 (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit by sockpuppet. Ckfasdf (talk) 07:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by some IPs. Zach (talk to me) 08:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism in recent days. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again by IPs and new user. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Highly obscene and unnecessary messages by IP - https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thewikizoomer&oldid=1246488973. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continued re-insertion by IPs of an image which is most likely a copyright infringement. TarnishedPathtalk 09:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Koopinator (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: I hope it can be pointed out on the discussion page that the explosive devices were not limited to Gold Apollo; devices from the well-known Japanese company Icom Incorporated also exploded. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: "acts to promote awareness of Israel and the Middle East in the United Kingdom." is wholly misleading and accepts the purported purpose of the journal without quotes to indicate potential bias. The article has essentially no critique of what is a distinctly right-wing journal (IE: there is a major bias in the journal, regardless of left or right affiliation) except for an even more right-wing criticism. Given the clear bias and the unfinished nature of the page, it should really be opened up LordGigapiller (talk) 02:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- If there is a reliable source for such a critique, please post it here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change the "mainly Hezbollah members" note on the casualties to "mainly civilians" as a large swath of Hezbollah casualties were apart of their political wing and considered civilians under international law, as well as ensuring the hundreds of medical staff who use pagers and were injured are not ignored. By simply stating that the majority of casualties were apart of Hezbollah, is suggests that the majority of casualties were non-civilian, which is inherently incorrect as stated above. It is imperative that this fact be clarified to prevent misinformation and further demonization of Lebanon.
Furthermore, it must be stated clearly and constantly that not only were the vast majority of the victims civilians, but that such an attack is, by definition and intent, a terror attack on Lebanon by israel (as israel has now confirmed they were behind it and had been planning it for an unspecified length of time). The severity of the attack in the context of international law must also be stated clearly as this is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention and general international law that protects civilians from attack and prohibits the use of terrorism a a legitimate manner of warfare.
For evidence to the above claims, see https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/9/18/israels-war-on-gaza-live-thousands-injured-in-lebanon-pager-explosions in which multiple quotes from israel, Hezbollah, the Lebanese Health Ministry, the UN, and various other third-parties with weight on the issue can be found and used to validate the above claims. Against the Empire (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
(I did not put the talk page by mistake in the page title field, that was intentional)
Add topic about the sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" in the third paragraph of the article, with the next paragraph as the body of the topic:
The sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" appears to contradict other pieces of information in the article, specifically that two children died from the explosions. Hezbollah doesn't seem to have a history of using child soldiers in any capacity. The reported ages of the children who died seem to be around the range of 8-11, so I think it's safe to assume that the children who died were not members of Hezbollah. The size of the explosions wouldn't of been enough to kill someone without being in close proximity to it (its not like the pagers had a blast radius of several hundred meters), which implies that the children were either holding the pager or in close proximity to the pagers. Therefore, it can be assumed that non-Hezbollah members were carrying pagers. Granted, I doubt these children were carrying around a pager wherever they went, but they must've been relatively close to it in order to be killed by the pager (as in, holding or carrying the pager).
The reason why I'm saying to add a topic to the talk page instead of just "remove this sentence from the article" is because it's debatable if it actually does contradict, and I'd prefer to get some consensus about it beforehand. I can't request an edit of the article on the talk page due to it being protected, so I can't just use the edit request to gauge consensus on this issue. This could also very well be considered WP:OR, I'm of the opinion that "the explosive that requires one to be close to it to hurt them implies that people who were hurt by it were close to it" would fall under WP:CALC, but I could see consensus going either way on this. AlexChillOut (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 19 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Account creator
[edit]- Tiggerjay (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Returning from a wiki-break, former ACC. Happy to help with the backlog. TiggerJay (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]- SerChevalerie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any problems with your creations but as the rate is relatively low (last 25 takes us back to 2018), there will be minimal benefit to NPP in autopatrolling them.
Not done for now, but thank you for thinking of the backlog. – Joe (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. SerChevalerie (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Intruder007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to introduce an exceptional editor and author with a amazing track record in editing and article creation. Created 182 articles, none of which have been deleted, with the majority focusing on BLPs. Nice editor, and it’s clear that he is one of the editors for whom this user right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Done Those are nice, clean bios. Just stop naming non-notable siblings, please, Intruder007. Schwede66 19:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! About the siblings, I was just following the format of other articles, but I'll take it into account. Intruder007 (talk) 21:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Namesnik (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Of course, I am ashamed that I have not yet made 400, 300 or even 150 articles and most likely will never make that many. But I can say in my «defense» that more than half of them are rare goods, they are world premieres. Before that, there were no such articles in Wikipedias. And I had to create Wikidata for many of them, categories on Commons and start from scratch. It is important for me to make articles in the English Wikipedia, because this immediately promotes a new topic to the whole world. --- - Names·nik·tlk 16:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Good work. Please have a look at MOS:SECTIONORDER. Schwede66 19:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Longhornsg (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
A good editor with a solid history of article creation, having created 135 articles, with only one being PROD’d in 2014 and another AfD’d in 2018. The other three deletions, which were G6 and G8, are not particularly significant. Since 2018, none of their articles have been deleted. Their article creation primarily focuses on BLPs, demonstrating their knowledge of notability guidelines. I don’t believe they would abuse the right, and granting it would help reduce the backlog. GrabUp - Talk 05:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- 98Tigerius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- S-Aura (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I am requesting for Page Mover rights on Wikipedia. I have been an active contributor and have made significant contributions.
I believe in my experience and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 1024 total edits. — MusikBot talk 09:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. WP:PMCRITERIA mention 3,000 edits as a guideline for granting, which you're significantly under. However, the biggest problem is that you've only performed 10 page moves thus far, so you don't have a demonstrated need for the tools at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mischellemougly (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Rofraja (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been reviewing and fixing bare URLs for the past year and I would like to try something different. I'd like to get reviewer rights to be able to start reviewing from a different angle. Rofraja (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- MP1999 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I'm requesting for permissions because I know it will save a lot of time my time to undo problematic edits. I have read the guidelines for how and when to use rollback so yes am ready. Cheers
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 16:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for the exact same reason I declined your previous request -Fastily 19:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily But I Did Exactly what you said in the previous request. MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- No, you didn't. Re-read my previous decline. -Fastily 20:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tesleemah (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello!
I have been guiding new users against Vandalism for a while now and this is done mostly offline.however,recently my passion for more onwiki contribution grew and I signed up as a host on Wikipedia Teahouse where I have been guiding new editors, I will like to request the right to roll back edit in order to do more of onwiki tasks and ease the work of admins. Tesleemah (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 19:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cooldudeseven7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to have rollback because vandalism on wikipedia is always high and it is important to have people looking out for potential vandals, and lower this. I will not give mercy unless it is a good faith edit and will make sure to always warn users, as I am doing right now with the help of Ultraviolet. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 69 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. Sorry, but you do not meet the minimum requirements for the perm, which include 200 mainspace edits. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- It says I have 400 edits? Not 69? What is a mainspace edit difference from a normal edit?? Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 17:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- A mainspace edit is (bit of oversimplication) an edit to an actual, live Wikipedia article, as opposed to a user's talk page, this page (in the Wikipedia) namespace, or something else. See WP:MAINSPACE. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- It says I have 400 edits? Not 69? What is a mainspace edit difference from a normal edit?? Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 17:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- XCBRO172 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have over 800 edits, most of which are on the main space. I am aware I have a somewhat lousy history with giving proper edit summaries, as i didn't fill out revision summaries, but I have tried to rectify it. I was also involved in a dispute which might have been classified as an edit war back in April. Other then that I have a clean slate. Thanks for considering. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 20:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links