Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
- THEOFFICIALRCP (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 00:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Lakrapea (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Arsesy8 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- LIGMATV (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Hello darkness my old friend I've come to talk to you again (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stinkieboi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Toastygaming367282djrirjrjjif (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ewusieajoman Council (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- WilliamDavidstpatrickscollege (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Cattyfromyourmom (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Correct-Information-Supplier-1911 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Destinction (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Used c instead of k attempting to skip filter: stink(|s|ing|er|y). Violating string: destinktion" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- AutisticPotato (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "autism" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Do be aware that some users who use this string may genuinely be autistic - please be careful and make sure you are dealing with a vandal/LTA first -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redd revenge (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MyChemicalRomanceIsAwesome (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Idontenjoyschool (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Robertsltd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Zokkipaki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "paki" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- AnnonymousFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- OFFICIALturtIe0517 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- The sigma of rizzlers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and offensive username. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 02:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. If there's something really offensive about this that warrants blocking without having edited, I'm not seeing it. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing it either - what is supposed to be offensive about this? — The Anome (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. @331dot, @The Anome, @Nedia020415: Based on the definition of these words that are available online, it's definitely not a violation from my perspective. Does it likely indicate the person is immature? Sure, but it's not offensive or a violation in any way I'd say. I know 331dot already said wait til they edit, but I felt it better to take it farther and clarify that the name isn't offensive so that, if they do edit, the name isn't brought back here. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Let's start a pool on when the first Skibidi, sigma, or rizzler passes RFA. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hey man im josh I concur. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think its a vandal. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 19:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Vandalism is handled at WP:AIV, but they haven't edited at all, never mind vandalism. 331dot (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry @331dot. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 19:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am sorry if I disturbed you. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 19:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Vandalism is handled at WP:AIV, but they haven't edited at all, never mind vandalism. 331dot (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing it either - what is supposed to be offensive about this? — The Anome (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Cornwall Museum and Art Gallery (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. ASUKITE 15:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- CIAScompetitions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username implies shared use. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Linguidoor2025 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Draft:Indianization (i11n) contains a spamlink to linguidoor.com. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 81.92.241.66 is persistently removing sourced info and adding unsources info. 1Veertje (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them a level 2 warning. When it's a single user AIV and a block, after adequate warning, is usually the better way to resolve these things. Daniel Case (talk) 20:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 21:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism from the school district (!). 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 22:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 199.96.184.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for five years. Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 24.55.33.220 (talk) 23:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism regarding trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 00:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term insertion of citogenesis birthdates by a sockpuppet. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term insertion of citogenesis death dates by a sockpuppet. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term changing of birth date by a sockpuppet. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long-term edit warring between an IP editor and an extended-confirmed editor spanning over 7 months. Also see WP:ANI#User: Gandalfett edits on "Malaysians" keeps reverting my edits especially in the infobox title. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... this page has been spammed for 5 years ago and protected in 2020 . 2001:44C8:4446:6855:B0EE:C038:4F25:5742 (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- The protecting admin has not edited in almost four years, so ... anyone else have any thoughts? Daniel Case (talk) 22:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- No previous protections prior to indef? WP:TRYUNPROT. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... (it says British Colonialism in 1607 led to the 13 colonies when in fact it was the English Empire who colonised those 13 states, Britain was not a union until 1707) . Mrwardster (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- While you're technically correct, the term used in the article redirects to British colonization of the Americas; there, the point you wanted to make is actually made. I would decline this request. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 22:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
"prompting Israeli forces to fight back and apply the Hannibal Directive against its own citizens.[78][79][80] The clash resulted in the deaths of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, including 815 civilians.[81][82] After"
CORRECTION:
". The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, including 815 civilians.[81][82] There were accusations that Israel applied the Hannibal Directive against its own soldiers.[78][79][80] After"
Reason: Accuracy. The corrected form is what the provided sources support. The sources (and the directive) refer to soldiers, not civilians. Further, while sources for accusations are valid, the sources clearly frame this as a potential accusation rather than an establishment of fact, which the article's current phrasing misrepresents. Itamarro (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
| 15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |