Jump to content

User:Bellerophon/Tools

This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User page

Go to my user page
Go to my user page

Talk

Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.
Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.

Email

Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.
Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.

Adoption

Check out my adoption school
Check out my adoption school

Awards

My awards and recognitions
My awards and recognitions

Contribs

Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia
Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia

Sandbox

Take a look at my work in progress
Take a look at my work in progress

Tools

Tools
Tools

Edit count

Take a look at my edit count
Take a look at my edit count


3

WikiDefcon 3
Moderate to high level of vandalism

4.55 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot —12:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


Template:R template index - redirect template index


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 62
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 24
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 16
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 157
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 3
Open sockpuppet investigations 311
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs[edit]

Administrative backlog[edit]

Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports[edit]

Bot-reported[edit]

User-reported[edit]

More diffs [1] [2] [3]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


CSD / PRODs[edit]

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 1

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 13 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP[edit]

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported[edit]

User-reported[edit]

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Doraemon (2005 TV series)[edit]

Reason: Disruptive and unsourced edits by new users and IPs again and again. M S Hassan (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

@M S Hassan: It is not easy for an admin here with no knowledge of the topic to see why the edits are disruptive. Please post a brief explanation on article talk and try to get the new editors to engage there. Post again if the problem can be made clear. Johnuniq (talk) 07:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Suzanne Bernert[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep removing sourced content [4] [5] [6] which is explicitly mentioned by the subject herself in interview corroborated in two sources present int he public domain [7] [8]. Might be a case of WP:COI. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Lectonar: Disruption continues. See - [9]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Magandang Dilag[edit]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits / posting of wrong information from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Brandon Ingram[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sneaky IP vandalism. C F A 💬 13:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Nikki Hiltz[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of misgendering vandalism over the past little while, as I believe the article subject has been in the news. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

2024 Mangaf building fire[edit]

Reason: Continuing unsubstantiated tampering of death toll by IP. Borgenland (talk) 14:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Cooper Flagg[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flagg is a very high-level basketball prospect and this article is frequently the target of vandals of all sorts. User:Namiba 14:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Abdul Raheem Abdulla[edit]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, he also has many haters. The article needs cleanups with those editings; many hate words in dhivehi languageexample. "Tinu" meaning he is a Tin. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 14:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Shortcuts

2010 Atlantic hurricane season[edit]

Reason: The extended confirmed protection is no longer necessary because the autoconfirmed vandalism-only account that vandalized the page in October 2022 probably won't come back to this article. I would suggest reducing it to semi-protection or unprotecting the page entirely. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Whoops, I did not discuss with the protecting admin first. I did not see that note until after submitting this. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Well, you still haven't notified him, so now I shall have to do so. @Cryptic: how say you? Favonian (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I don't remember the context. No opinion; do what you think best. —Cryptic 10:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Elizabethan era[edit]

Reason: Page has been protected for some years now and there seems to be no apparent issues still. 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:F1D0:B8C5:6F4F:ABB1 (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Page has been protected since 2017. 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:F1D0:B8C5:6F4F:ABB1 (talk) 00:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Materialscientist What do you think? 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:F1D0:B8C5:6F4F:ABB1 (talk) 00:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Pinging @Materialscientist: Left guide (talk) 04:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 Comment: Have you considered that the lack of "issues" might be because it's protected? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumanuil (talk • contribs) 05:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Good point! Although it's been protected since 2017? 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:F1D0:B8C5:6F4F:ABB1 (talk) 11:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


John_Roberts[edit]

Change "He has been described as having a moderate conservative judicial philosophy" to "he was once described as having a moderate conservative judicial philosophy, but has since proven to be otherwise." citation: https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/07/justices-rule-trump-has-some-immunity-from-prosecution/ Jajor36 (talk) 23:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

@Jajor36: Are you sure you want to be trying to introduce a clear POV into a contentious topic? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Message box/fmbox.css (request) 2024-06-25 04:53 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Rent control in the United States (request) 2024-06-27 15:39 Fully protected, expires 2024-07-03 at 19:40:19 UTC (log) Modified by Daniel Case on 2024-06-26: "upgrade to full for duration since no one's been using the talk page"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
17 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Gallery/styles.css (request) 2024-06-10 16:38 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2021-05-06: "Highly visible template: match parent"
Module:Road data (request) 2024-06-11 17:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Lectonar on 2023-05-30: "High-risk template or module"
Module:Lang/data (request) 2024-06-11 18:55 Template-protected (log) Protected by Trappist the monk on 2017-12-13: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox legislative election (request) 2024-06-16 19:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Number 57 on 2020-04-13: "High use template, recent additions messing things up"
Template:Canadian party colour (request) 2024-06-19 02:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by MSGJ on 2018-03-24: "reinstate template protection"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Ahnentafel (request) 2024-06-24 19:59 Template-protected (log) Protected by Primefac on 2018-04-27: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Designation (request) 2024-06-25 03:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Inflation/year (request) 2024-06-30 03:13 Template-protected (log) From Template:Inflation-year: Protected by Zzuuzz on 2016-10-21: "High risk template 11k+ transclusions"
Template:Inflation/fn (request) 2024-06-30 03:19 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Translated page (request) 2024-07-01 21:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2015-05-18: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Xt (request) 2024-07-02 10:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2021-01-14: "used in system messages (MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-archive)"
Module:College color (request) 2024-07-02 14:27 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


WP:RFA[edit]

RFA= Requests for adminship

WP:RFP[edit]

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Xegma[edit]

Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

User:C1K98V[edit]

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Horse Eye's Back[edit]

Because NPP is the first line of systemic bias on wiki, exempting even just my creations from NPP is an improvement. In my own experience NPP has been a net negative, while I'm sure it is useful in some cases at some point my article creations aren't those. My creation history is beyond reproach, I have even been solicitied to join NPP on multiple occasions but have repeatedly declined on ideological grounds (I don't join paramilitary organization like the NPP). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Rlendog (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
@Rlendog: This is your first edit to this page since 2009 and the first time you have ever granted a perm to another user, and it is to accept, without discussion or explanation, six minutes after it was made, a request for an exemption to NPP that calls it a "net negative" and "paramilitary organization". That's rather odd. Would you mind explaining what brought you here and your thought process in handling this request a bit further? – Joe (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I wholly share Joe's concerns here, even putting aside the extraordinary speed this was seemingly actioned, but to not challenge someone who clearly has some significant underlying issues with the page patrolling process seems to be an oversight. The appellant's expressed opinions on the process and their desire to bypass it entirely, with that rationale, warrants scrutiny. Bungle (talk • contribs) 13:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed several of his new articles and did not see any issues. Rlendog (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I've also been familiar with this editor's editing for a while, and while I think there have been issues with some of his edits to noticeboards, I have not seen any issues with his new pages. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
You don't see an issue with the NPP is a paramilitary organization comment then? – Joe (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I have problems with the way this editor sometimes interacts with other editors, including overzealous language. But those problems are not with his editing of articles, creation of new articles, or with his knowledge of our guidelines and policies. If anything, they are overzealous in discussing those guidelines and policies, which is my impression of his depiction of NPP.
My experience with this editor goes back to January/February 2023, in a discussion at ANI regarding AfDs of certain football players. I thought some of their comments were inappropriate, particularly disparaging one particular editor involved in the discussion. He also made at least one uncomplimentary comment about me. Given that I was involved, and that the long discussion at ANI was plenty visible to many admins, I did not take any action regarding the HEB's disparaging comments at the time. But I did review their edits to ensure that they were not just trolling, and found that their edits to articles were fine and that they can be helpful to other editors who ask for assistance on their talk page. And since I was concerned that their aggressive comments about other editors may be a pattern, I saved some of the diffs from that ANI discussion in case issues arose later.
I've had a few other interactions with them since. In a discussion in late 2023 there were more interactions between HEB and the editor they disparaged in early 2023, in which HEB made at least one more condescending comment about the other editor. There was also an ANI around the same time about HEB's behavior in which that other editor linked the page containing my diffs from the previous ANI. I don't think I participated in the later ANI (if I did my participation was minimal), since the evidence I would have had to offer had already been linked, but I checked HEB's contributions again and did not find anything wrong with his article editing, and again saw their willingness to help others, albeit sometimes caustically, which is another reason I chose to not participate (or minimally participate) in the new ANI. After that ANI ended with no action against HEB, HEB requested that the diff page be speedy deleted. But as an admin, you are able to see it: User:Rlendog/Sandbox6.
There is one more incident I recall interacting with HEB on, where they made a disparaging remark about an editor who created an article about a sportsperson (I think an ice hockey player) that was at AfD. In that case the article pretty clearly did not meet our current notability guidelines, but had met the notability guidelines that were in place when the article was created. So I commented (not sure if it was on the AfD or on their talk page) that HEB ought to be careful about disparaging editors who created articles that were perfectly legitimate under guidelines then in effect, even if those guidelines subsequently changed.
But none of my interactions or reviews of their contributions indicated any issues with their editing or creation of articles, or with their knowledge of our current guidelines or policies; in fact, my only concern with their knowledge is their overzealousness in enforcing them. So when this request came up on my Watchlist, I was surprised that they didn't already have Autopatrol rights. I actually came to the page wondering if they were disparaging someone for requesting Autopatrol. When I saw it was they requesting, I checked some of their recent creations to make sure their wasn't a problem, and granted the rights. I am sure that they are aware that if they abuse the right it will be removed. And if you think I was mistaken in granting the right, I have no problem with you removing it. But while I think there are sometimes issues with the way they interact with others, those are not issues with article creation. And while it is possible that their interaction issues may one day get them banned or blocked, as long as they remain editors in good standing, I am comfortable with them being Autopatrolled (but again, you may have more experience granting this right, and if I erred feel free to overturn it). Rlendog (talk) 18:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Dclemens1971[edit]

As a new page reviewer for the past couple months, I've seen the value of keeping high-quality page creations out of the review backlog. Since 2022, I've created 154 articles (one of which was PROD'ed, uncontested, early on, but I learned from it and that's the only one ever proposed for deletion in any venue). I think my track record of page creation is strong and I'd like to receive autopatrolled rights to reduce the NPP backlog for my future article creations. I'm also autopatrolled for redirects if that's helpful context. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


Confirmed[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Requests for page mover

Page mover[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:PadFoot2008[edit]

Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

I am slightly concerned about the number of recent reverted moves. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Primefac, concerning those two reverted moves, they were indeed mistakes on my part. In hindsight, I should have done a deeper study of the main article Gahadavala dynasty. I had decided to move some Indian monarch articles to be in par with the standard convention of "(name) of (kingdom)" (such as George II of Great Britain), and when I discovered the two articles (Madanapala (Gahadavala dynasty) and Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty)), I proceeded to have a quick look at the main article, where I saw the phrase "Gahadavalas of Kannauj", and after performing a quick search through the usages of "Govindachandra of Kannauj" in RS, I arrived at the conclusion that it would be a good move location. After the move was reverted, I dug deeper and read the main article more carefully and found out that the Gahadavalas do not actually appear to have ruled over the city of Kannauj but rather over Varanasi. I have since been more careful in performing such moves, and the five monarch related article moves performed since seem good for now. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:SparrowQ[edit]

Reason for requesting page mover rights that "I am requesting page mover rights to efficiently handle page renaming jobs. This will help simplify the maintenance process and improve the content." SparrowQ (talk) 20:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 1120 total edits. — MusikBot talk 20:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done: you do not meet the minimum requirements and do not appear to have a need for this right. You can move most pages on your own, and if you run into any problems, you can get help at WP:RM/TR. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User:KingSkyLord[edit]

I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:48JCL[edit]

I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

User:HypeBoy[edit]

I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism (I routinely fight vandalism by patrolling edit filter log) as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR, and WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done, I looked through the history of your talk page to see how you interact with other editors and quickly found this edit (pure vandalism, and dismissed with "Get off my talk page."). Plus, lots of other warnings (and a block) for personal attacks; copyvio, edit warring, and more, and you chose to respond insultingly to most of them. Advanced permissions require the ability to distinguish vandalism (and obviously refrain from it yourself) and to engage in good faith with messages from other editors. DanCherek (talk) 17:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
@DanCherek: I respect your decision, but except for my regrettable vandalism, those other edit summaries were from 2022 (the year where I got my only block), and it's mid 2024 now. I have since assumed good faith, stayed away from violating the rules, and made substantial edits. Is this terminal and it's a fool's errand to re-request in the future? — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 07:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
No, not a fool's errand, and I understand that a lot of those warnings were in the past, but edit summaries like this and this – from this past month – aren't ones to be proud of in terms of AGF'ing. Not trying to bring you down, but to set up the rest of this answer and hopefully help a future request: my advice is that when reviewing a permissions request, one of the things I (and probably many other admins) consider is how you would likely respond to a question about your use of the permission. So I suggest first building a track record of interacting with others in a collegial way, on your talk page and elsewhere. If a new editor's good-faith pending change gets reverted by you, for whatever reason, and they ask you about it on your talk page, I would like to have an indication that you would discuss it with them and not just blank the message. I appreciate the recent note on your talk page history, I think it's a good start. DanCherek (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Skitash[edit]

I have a very strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines, and I revert disruptive editors and report them to WP:AIV on a daily basis. I would greatly appreciate access to this permission so that I can review edits to articles. Skitash (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done DanCherek (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Harpick[edit]

I help with reverting vandalism, and have also read up on Wikipedia's policies on what content would be generally allowed here. -- Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 12 days. — MusikBot talk 00:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done User has been CU-blocked. DanCherek (talk) 04:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User:TCMemoire[edit]

Active in vandalism fighting, already have rollback rights. I would like this tool because I do patrol some high-traffic protected pages, e.g. Mount Rushmore, for WikiProjects I'm involved in. – TCMemoire 15:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 15:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User:KingSkyLord[edit]

I have been editing in this site for over 7 years and I will be using this permission primarily for dealing with positive requests and vandalism in football articles (e.g. Toni Kroos) KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 18:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:TarnishedPath[edit]

I've been editing WP for 17 odd years and I'm able to identify what is and what isn't vandalism. Also familiar with Wikipedia's basic content policies and the basic legal policy on copyrights. Requesting the right as I have at least two articles on my watchlist (Australian Greens and Linux) for which there are regularly pending changes. I would use the permission to process requests in those article (plus any others that are on my watchlist that I don't see often) and occasionally peaking to see if there is a backlog. TarnishedPathtalk 11:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Requests for rollback


Rollback[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:RJShashwat[edit]

Recently, I have reverted several edits on pages within the Wikipedia:WikiProject Jainism and some in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism. In my view, there are very few active users with rollback rights working on these WikiProjects. I would want to volunteer to be one because of the sheer abuse of pages in these WikiProjects. Several users push their POV on pages in these WikiProjects since they are related to religion. People are adamant on their POV being correct. Mutual rivalry is common on pages in these two projects. I have boldly reverted edits that were clearly vandalism and those that pushed a POV and deleted the other, more-sourced POV on pages like Manatunga, Sivabhuti, Jain temples, Pavagadh, Hathigumpha inscription and some other smaller pages as well. I believe rollback rights would just make this job easier for me because on some pages, I have had to manually remove the content that vandalized the page. Rollback rights would just help me do it faster. RJShashwat (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:2RDD[edit]

I hereby tender my application for the distinguished role of Rollbacker, having accomplished a notable volume of contributions exceeding 500 edits and consistently demonstrated a steadfast commitment to maintaining the highest standards of content quality through the diligent reversion of vandalized pages. I am confident that my expertise and unwavering dedication render me an exemplary candidate for this position, and I eagerly anticipate the opportunity to further serve the community in this capacity. 2RDD (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Footer[edit]

Policies and links

    My Tools[edit]

    ACC stuff[edit]

    AfC stuff[edit]

    Copyright stuff[edit]

    • Replace the text with one of the following:

      {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}

      {{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}

    • Go to today's section and add

      * {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~

      to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you)
    • Advise the contributor of the material at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.

    {{subst:cclean|url=}}

    Adoption stuff[edit]

    Anti-vandal stuff[edit]

    Special pages[edit]

    Quick templates[edit]

    • {{subst:ANI-notice}}
    • {{GOCE|user=Bellerophon|date=}}

    Sister projects[edit]

    Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other volunteer projects:

    Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Bellerophon/Tools&oldid=712828272"