User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 83

Archive 80

Archive 81

Archive 82

Archive 83

Archive 84

Archive 85

→

Archive 90

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

• File:ActionDay1 lg.jpg
• File:Israel hadari 2955 lg.jpg
• File:Preval-2.jpg
• File:Preval-1.jpg

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:EMK eulogy of RFK.ogg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:EMK eulogy of RFK.ogg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Old Nassau

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Knuckleball! may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jenny McCarthy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Drowning Girl may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Whaam! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{cite book|editor=Bader|pages=2–4|chapter=Reviews 1962–64|author=Judd, Donald|quote=)}}</ref>
• Tate for £4,665 (£{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|4665|1966}}}} in {{CURRENTYEAR}} currency) in 1966 (in spite of a reported market price of £5,382 (£{{formatnum:{{Inflation|UK|5382|1966}}}} in {{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominations

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lucky Guy at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

New naming consensus

Like I said, it would have been nice for you to notify the WikiProjects you knew were going to be affected, seeing as you used many articles within our scope as your examples! Posting on various policy/guidelines/MOS etc. pages is all well and good but doesn't help any of us who don't 'watch' those pages. GiantSnowman 14:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Understandable - but surely you can see why you should have notified those WikiProjects? Obviously you cannot notify every single WikiProject, but it would have been sensible to notify any/all applicable WikiProjects if you used articles within their scope as your examples. By using them as examples, you were basically saying "these articles will be affected one way or the other." GiantSnowman 14:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jon Horford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Drowning Girl peer review

Sorry about the formatting on the Peer Review for Drowning Girl. I meant to get around to reformatting that, but I got distracted. Since you've done a good enough job, I'll defer to your formatting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

• From the editor: Signpost developments

• Featured content: A week of portraits

• Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report

• News and notes: "Cease and desist", World Trade Organization says to Wikivoyage; Could WikiLang be the next WMF project?

• In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia

• WikiProject report: Operation Normandy

• Technology report: Developers accused of making Toolserver fight 'pointless'

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 01:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Woman with Flowered Hat

Thanks for your work on the article. Is your goal Good article status? Sure hope so! Apologies if my edits caused any edit conflicts--just wanted to pitch in a bit. Keep up the great work! --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:20, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks much

Thanks very much for the Four Award for Everything Tastes Better with Bacon, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for A Christmas Story: The Musical

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Trip to Bountiful (play)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Red links

I'm not going to edit war over something stupid like this, but why are you so against red links for people who are clearly notable? A Tony nomination is enough to prove notability; the only reason why they don't have articles yet is because nobody has gotten around to creating them yet. Not only do the red links make it easier once the article is created, but they also remind editors that those pages have to be created. JDDJS (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Redlinks aren't going to highlight omissions any more than a lack of a link would. And at least with a redlink, it is clear that the article doesn't exist, and it doesn't lead readers on a pointless search for an article that doesn't exist. However, like I said before, I'm not going to edit war over something stupid, so you can have it your way. JDDJS (talk) 18:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-06-05/Discussion report.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Pine^✉ 22:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Assembled Parties

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Lucky Guy (play)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Testament of Mary (play)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Wrong date for earthquake

The Fukushima earthquake was March 11, not April 11. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.128.232.94 (talk) 03:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at Pine's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

--Pine^✉ 03:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Lauren Ward

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Keala Settle

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Hands on a Hardbody (musical)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Woman with Flowered Hat

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Template:UK best-selling singles (by year)

Nice template. One question: would it not be better to split it so each 'block' contains twenty years i.e. 1952-1971, 1972-1991, 1992-2011, 2012-2031 etc?--Launchballer 11:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cinderella (2013 Broadway production)

Gatoclass 16:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Crying Girl (lithograph).gif

Thanks for uploading File:Crying Girl (lithograph).gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Gather Together FAC

Tony!

Hey, looks like your Amaker article is really close to passing. Congrats! I currently have an article at FAC, too, [1] but it's dangerously close to failing due to lack of support. Would you mind taking a look at it for me? Thanks, and let me know what I can do for you. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, wanted to let you know that I addressed your comments here. I'm still worried about lack of support! ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Rob Howell

Gatoclass 00:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Rob McClure

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Knuckleball!

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Comment on reversion of "I vespri Siciliani"

Please note that the links should not (and, as I recall, did not) go to the same place. I've vastly expanded the "Vepres" article and focused it on the French version. At the same time, I created a separate "Vespri" article which is rather shorter but which is about the Italian version. Viva-Verdi (talk) 16:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Tony, for the reversion. Viva-Verdi (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Oxbow

Am going to put Oxbow (horse) up for GA in the next day or so (have to source a couple more things Craiglduncan added). You in to support the effort? Feel free to pop over and fix any excessively florid and breathless sportswriter prose, eh? Montanabw^(talk) 19:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Lichtenstein

Take it to talk, the affair is non-essential - an attempt to sell an album - basically disgusting...Modernist (talk) 15:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

What's more it besmirches the character of his widow - a living person - head of the Lichtenstein Foundation - maybe we should ask them what they think?...Modernist (talk) 15:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

King & Maxwell

Hey, agreed that we shouldn't really enumerate each guest appearance.

However since this is a new TNT series it may be worth noting the information for all viewers or interested parties - including those who were also fans of the former & quite successful 'Leverage', which also aired on the TNT network.

Also especially since it is still new any additional information on the show is always appreciated by all those with interest :)

P.S: keep up the good contributions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.224.138 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

• News and notes: How Wikimedia affiliates are spending $8.4 million; PRISM scandal

• Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange

• In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"

• Op-ed: The tragedy of Wikipedia's commons

• Discussion report: VisualEditor, elections, bots, and more

• Traffic report: Who holds the throne?

• Arbitration report: Two cases suspended; proposed decision posted in Argentine History

• WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Chicago in the 1930s

Thought this might interest you.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Portrait Diptych of Dürer's Parents

If I put this up for PR, could you give an openion. Ceoil (talk) 07:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Thats ok, you have an eye obviously. Ceoil (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Congrats!

Hey Tony, just saw that the Amaker article passed to FA. Nice! In honor of your hard work and persistence, I reward you with this heaping and yummy plate of spaghetti. I love ya, man, but sorry not enough to strain it like Amaker's mom. ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Two questions

Hi Tony, two questions:

1. I'm ready to take oxbow (horse) for GA, however, the informal peer reviewer I had look over the article thinks we should take it directly to FAC. I'm hesitant to do so, partly due to stability issues (by the time it's GA, time should be adequate for FA) but wonder what you think? Montanabw^(talk) 21:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
2. I'd like to invite you to User:Montanabw/Sandbox 4 where I am working on an article about Paynter, who doesn't have his own article yet. Want to help get it going? Thanks! Montanabw^(talk) 21:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Dia dos Namorados

Please see Template:Did you know nominations/Dia dos Namorados, where I've identified a couple of concerns. On an unrelated note, what's up with the Crying Girl lithograph image that the bot mentioned up above? You appear to have uploaded an image that's exactly one pixel; was it a test? Nyttend (talk) 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Responded to your question. Nyttend (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Not yet — I'm finishing a 15-minute break at work. The little Notification only showed me another user's message, so I've spent my whole break answering another question and didn't see yours until just now. I'll get to it as soon as possible; thanks. Nyttend (talk) 17:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Crying Girl (lithograph).gif

A tag has been placed on File:Crying Girl (lithograph).gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Kourtney Hansen

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Whaam! text balloon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whaam! text balloon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
368		World Series of Poker bracelet (talk)						Add sources
224		Ben-Day dots (talk)						Add sources
26		Jeff Lisandro (talk)						Add sources
2,221		Betty Broderick (talk)						Add sources
6		E-hon (talk)						Add sources
925		World Series of Poker (talk)						Add sources
11		17th GLAAD Media Awards (talk)						Cleanup
108		Black Watch (play) (talk)						Cleanup
8		2011 World Series of Poker Europe results (talk)						Cleanup
902		Crows Zero (talk)						Expand
13		2011 World Series of Poker Europe (talk)						Expand
64		Leo Castelli (talk)						Expand
10		David Sheehan (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
6		Frank Sanello (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2,263		Jesus Christ Superstar (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
15,810		Lana Del Rey (talk)						Merge
287		Mary Poppins (musical) (talk)						Merge
3,944		Pizza (talk)						Merge
19		Jose Cha Cha Jimenez (talk)						Wikify
37		Barney Balaban (talk)						Wikify
63		Chicago Botanic Garden (talk)						Wikify
2		Totem (Paluzzi) (talk)						Orphan
0		Morgan Monument (Decatur) (talk)						Orphan
8		Fallen Firefighters Memorial (talk)						Orphan
5		Suetsumuhana (talk)						Stub
7		Perry Friedman (talk)						Stub
66		2013 Pulitzer Prize (talk)						Stub
22		Miyako Maki (talk)						Stub
5		Thang Luu (talk)						Stub
119		Up the Down Staircase (talk)						Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drowning Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heinemann Library (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Mila Kunis

Hey Tony. I've mentioned you here, at the talk page for the Mila Kunis article. It relates to a recommendation you made last spring in that article's good article review. Your suggestion has been used no fewer than eight times over the past year to revert the removal of a mention in the lede of Kunis' past relationship with Macaulay Culkin. While I sincerely admire and appreciate your considerable work to improve the content here, I don't think time is agreeing with mentioning Culkin in the lede at Kunis' article, and I hope you might have a moment to take another look (even if your opinion hasn't changed). Thank you, again. Take care! user:j (talk) 16:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Hi Tony. I'm reading through the Clinton RM and was wondering if you could clarify your comment for me. "Although my gut tells me to support, I think the historical reasons and BLP user preferences still carry."[2] Were you referring to the article subject's preference? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 06:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Lichtenstein

Wow, your work related to Roy Lichtenstein is incredible--keep up the great work! I went ahead and removed all of the articles for his individual paintings and sculptures from the "Pop art" category, which is already included for the parent categories "Paintings by Roy Lichtenstein" and "Sculptures by Roy Lichtenstein". Sorry I am not comfortable uploading images of the paintings... I hope my recent edits related to Lichtenstein were not intrusive. Just trying to pitch in when I can! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:41, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Crying Girl

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

-Note that the credits do not reflect a queue swaq. This article and the one below appeared on the main page at 8:00 rather than 16:00.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Hopeless (Roy Lichtenstein)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Hillary Clinton move review

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2013_June#Hillary_Clinton. Since you participated in this discussion on the rename of Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton, you are invited to offer your opinion at the move review. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Masterpiece (Roy Lichtenstein)

Hello! Your submission of Masterpiece (Roy Lichtenstein) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Doug Coldwell (talk) 17:53, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Tony - I know you are very acquainted with DYK. Maybe I missed something. Should there be a QPQ for your nomination's entry? If not, please let me know (and why). Maybe one has already been done and I missed it. I would like to pass your nomination. You write very good articles.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

• Op-ed: Two responses to the 'Tragedy of Wikipedia's Commons'

• Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week

• In the media: South African learners want Wikipedia; Editing of Israel topics

• WikiProject report: The Volunteer State: WikiProject Tennessee

• News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?

• Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen

• Discussion report: Citations, non-free content, and a MediaWiki meeting

• Technology report: May engineering report published

• Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment request—automation and arbitration enforcement

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Onyx

Hi, I was wondering if you could help me with finding a reliable source for Onyx (Every Little Time)? I can only find Discogs and Last.fm for decent biographies for him and even them are nicked from his MySpace page, none of which are reliable sources. It's incredibly annoying because he's notable; he had a #66 hit with the above song, but I can't reliably source it. Even AllMusic thinks its the name artist as Onyx. Any chance of a bit of help?--Launchballer 21:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

I was asking you because you were a member of WikiProject Music, but okay.--Launchballer 21:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Great American Wikinic 2013

Hey Tony, thanks for setting the Wikinic up and for keeping an eye on the weather. This was my first Wikipedia meetup; I had a great time and I'm glad to have finally met you and some other Wikipedians in person! See you again soon. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 23:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Masterpiece (Roy Lichtenstein)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Drowning Girl

Where the article states "The image is typical of Lichtenstein's depiction of comic subjects responding to a situation in a cliched manner." I don't have the source, but does it mean comic as in funny or comic as in comic book or comic art? Would it be better to change it to comic book subject or comic art subject for greater clarity of that's what the source intends? Hiding T 18:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• also, with "The waves are intended to "recall Hokusai as well as the biomorphic forms of Arp and Miro;"[48] just as the source comics were intended to." The statement that the source comics were intended to recall Hokusai, is that from a sourced interview with the creators of the original art or is that an opinion advanced by either the writer of the book or Lichtenstein? If it is opinion, we should avoid stating it as fact. Again I don;t have the source but would it be okay for you to check and amend as required? Hiding T 18:19, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I thought it would be easier because I thought you wanted me to strike a lot of material from the FAC page. No other reason. I'll add these there instead, my apologies, I'm never sure of all the rules regarding all the different processes. Thanks for your gentle pointer as to the correct etiquette. Hiding T 18:27, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Takka Takka

See Template:Did you know nominations/Takka Takka (Roy Lichtenstein). Good article, but needs a QPQ. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

RE: In A World

Actually, the first time the article was made, it was about a YouTube channel. It was more of an advertisement instead about the Sundance film. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 17:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drowning Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page De Kooning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Okay Hot-Shot, Okay!, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Ahh, I'm totally midphrase in my solo picture and didn't realize it was taken for online release (thought only Proof of Life for funders)--mind removing it from the page for me? Much appreciated.SarahPML (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Bratatat!

Gatoclass 08:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Varoom!

Gatoclass 08:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Takka Takka (Roy Lichtenstein)

Gatoclass (talk) 16:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Tiger, I know it doesn't do to remove an RS but takka takka can hardly be the sound of heavy artillery! I'd suggest that in this instance the author has got her terminology confused and that there's no benefit in citing her, so I've removed the link and changed the passage. Ericoides (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. What a nonsense! Ericoides (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for answering. I'm no weapons expert, far from it, but my understanding is that the rate of fire of artillery, which our description states "operates by projection of munitions far beyond the effective range of personal weapons", would never be able to produce that repetitive "takka takka" sound. It would go, "bang ... bang ... bang". The painting itself shows a machine gun. Even a heavy machine gun is not artillery in the sense that our article describes it. Ericoides (talk) 05:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

No, I hadn't. But I appreciate you being accomodating re this! Ericoides (talk) 05:36, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at I Jethrobot's talk page.
Message added 16:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

Hello. There's a discussion going on at The Dark Knight, and your input is appreciated. Randomuser112 (talk) 12:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

• Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week

• In the media: Daily Dot on Commons and porn; Jimmy Wales accused of breaking Wikipedia rules in hunt for Snowden

• Recent research: Most controversial Wikipedia topics, automatic detection of sockpuppets

• News and notes: Election results released

• Discussion report: Privacy policy, X!'s edit counter, old rangeblocks, and the Article Incubator

• Featured content: Wikipedia in black + Adam Cuerden

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Fashion

• Arbitration report: Argentine History closed; two cases remain suspended

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback: SpikeToronto

Hello, TonyTheTiger. You have new messages at SpikeToronto's talk page.
Message added 06:13, 28 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— SpikeToronto 06:13, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Poe Information...

Hello... Got your recent message, What's up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.221.232.232 (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Crak!

Gatoclass (talk) 10:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Outstanding

The only query I have outstanding is whether the material from Beaty's book is of any value at Drowning Girl. Once you clarify that I have no other issues with the article. I've not really been involved in the FA process in a long time, I just came along based on your post at WikiProject Comics so you'd best guide me as to what to do once we resolve the Beaty thing. Hiding T 21:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

• Not sure what you are asking, but Beaty's book is available on google books here. You can search inside the book for Lichtenstein. Does that help? Do you want me to add the material myself? See I'm not sure where it's best placed, whether in the main Lichtenstein article or is it worth rehashing in all the articles on his paintings sourced from comics like you do with Barsalou? The general view of Lichtenstein from the comics world is that there is agreement that he should have credited the original artists, agreement that he was violating copyright and agreement that he wasn't a great comics artist. Whether he is a good artist or not is split, although most lean towards him being a pop artist of note. Anyway, over to you. Hiding T 22:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)