User talk:Therapyisgood/Archive 1
Welcome
[edit]
|
Use of multiple accounts
[edit]Hi Therapyisgood. Are either Dog Hole Cave or Buchanan3 you? --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
FAC
[edit]We're done. Can will you make your decision? LittleJerry (talk) 01:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Therapyisgood is 
Confirmed to
- Buchanan3 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dog Hole Cave (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
These accounts do not qualify for any kind of privacy reasons. Under WP:VALIDALT, Privacy, "Although a privacy-based alternative account is not publicly connected to your main account, it should not be used in ways outlined in the inappropriate uses section of this page, and if it is, the account may be publicly linked to your main account for sanctions" Under WP:PROJSOCK which is in the inappropriate uses section of that page, Editing project space "Undisclosed alternative accounts are not to be used in discussions internal to the project." You may not use multiple accounts to edit the project namespace...anything beginning in Wikipedia or Wikipedia talk. That includes RfAs or anything listed under "Wikipedia:Featured list candidates" also.
Your complaints are invalid...all of it. That includes the baloney about being locked out of your account so that you just had to create Buchanan3 to edit that RfA. Garbage.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your email, not really my territory as it involves a checkuser block. You could go to Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System though. ϢereSpielChequers 18:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Lewis (baseball)
[edit]Hi Therapyisgood - I would agree about "a Major League Baseball" but when you reduce it to MBA the first sound is an "em" which takes "an".
A search of Wikipedia articles for "an MLB" gives 649 matches - whereas a search for "a MLB" gives 5 matches - including Lewis (baseball) and four quotations, which we don't change, even though they are wrong. I'll leave you to revert yourself - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Disagree. I go on what's right, not the number of search results. Therapyisgood (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- So, 650 people (649 plus me) are wrong, and you are right? - sounds unlikely
You probably don't want to read this - although I couldn't find an example for MLB - it does cover NBC - it is the sound, not the letter. - Arjayay (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)- Again the number of people saying something is totally and wholly irrelevant. However here and here seem to indicate the acronym's article is based on how it sounds, so I'll change it back. Regards. Therapyisgood (talk) 19:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing that - happy editing - Arjayay (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Again the number of people saying something is totally and wholly irrelevant. However here and here seem to indicate the acronym's article is based on how it sounds, so I'll change it back. Regards. Therapyisgood (talk) 19:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- So, 650 people (649 plus me) are wrong, and you are right? - sounds unlikely
Account restriction (User:Therapyisgood)
[edit]The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Due to recent misuse of multiple accounts, Therapyisgood (talk · contribs) is indefinitely restricted to editing with one account.
Support: Joe Roe, Maxim, SoWhy, Casliber, Bradv, Beeblebrox
Oppose:
Recuse:
For the Arbitration Committee, – Joe (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Account restriction (User:Therapyisgood)
DYK nomination of Lewis (baseball)
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Lewis (baseball) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]I have summarily closed the discussion you recently opened at WP:ANI as I believe your complaint to be without merit. Where possible please pursue other forms of dispute resolution before coming to ANI, which should generally be a last resort. A look at the diffs you linked left me with a strong conviction that you were over-reacting. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Lewis (baseball)
[edit]
On 26 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lewis (baseball), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lewis (first name unknown) pitched in his only Players' League game in 1890 and gave up 20 runs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lewis (baseball). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lewis (baseball)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Well done!
[edit]
|
Nature Barnstar |
| To Therapyisgood, thanks for the impressive expansion of Markham's storm petrel. Cheers, Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC) |
@Cwmhiraeth: Really appreciate it. Therapyisgood (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/What's a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This?/archive2
[edit]I would appreciate your thoughts on this. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Markham's storm petrel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Markham's storm petrel
[edit]On 6 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Markham's storm petrel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Markham's storm petrel, which nests in Peru and northern Chile, has been described as "one of the least known seabirds in the world"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Markham's storm petrel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Markham's storm petrel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Therapyisgood, Thanks for your comments on the article, which I've now addressed. Would you mind returning to the comments to say you're happy that I've responded to your suggestions? Thanks. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Chris Gragg
[edit]I am thinking about moving the Chris Gragg article to WP:FAR and posted this section on the talk page. Any feedback you have would be much appreciated. Tonystewart14 (talk) 23:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have nominated Chris Gragg for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Tonystewart14 (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel
[edit]The article Markham's storm petrel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Markham's storm petrel for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel
[edit]The article Markham's storm petrel you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Markham's storm petrel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for your comments on the Willie Mays peer review! I applied your suggestions, and I just nominated it for featured article status, so feel free to comment! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I just nominated Willie Mays for a peer review. During its recent featured article nomination, User:SandyGeorgia suggested it needed more work on the prose and mentioned that such a review could use the help of an experienced baseball editor like yourself. If you have time to take a look at it, your input would be greatly appreciated! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Sometime in the coming months when you have enough time, could you go through the Mays article and let me know what would need to be fixed for you to support its promotion to FA? The most recent review closed because no one had given any supports; I am thinking that a lot of people just didn't have time to look through such a long article. This way, you can look at it whenever you get a chance, instead of having to do so within a certain amount of time. Let me know! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 23:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 23, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 23, 2021. Congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you today for Lewis (baseball), who "played in one professional baseball game in 1890, and his first name is completely unknown. He's interesting for sure, and showed how the 1890 Buffalo Bisons were doing at the time. Set several records of futility, and was described as a "failure" and "unfortunate" in press at the time. History hasn't been kinder to him."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]baseball players and birds
Thank you for quality articles about baseball players, beginning with Craig Terrill, finest Lewis (baseball), for Markham's storm petrel, for gnomish work such as table row headers, for quality reviewing and adding images, for an encouraging user page from the start, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2562 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Anna Wilson (basketball)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anna Wilson (basketball) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Anna Wilson (basketball)
[edit]The article Anna Wilson (basketball) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Anna Wilson (basketball) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 00:41, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Liquid Death
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Liquid Death at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Anna Wilson (basketball)
[edit]The article Anna Wilson (basketball) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anna Wilson (basketball) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Terrence Clarke
[edit]
On 24 April 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Terrence Clarke, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Liquid Death
[edit]On 25 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liquid Death, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the canned-water company Liquid Death released two albums with lyrics consisting of hate comments the company received online? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liquid Death. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Liquid Death), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Anna Wilson (basketball)
[edit]On 30 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anna Wilson (basketball), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after coming back for a fifth season at Stanford, Anna Wilson won the 2021 NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Championship Game with the Cardinal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anna Wilson (basketball). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Anna Wilson (basketball)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Mom Genes
[edit]Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating Mom Genes.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This page needs more content and information. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 08:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Those Wild Wyndhams
[edit]Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating Those Wild Wyndhams.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
More information about this novel would be helpful. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Bunk (book)
[edit]Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating Bunk (book).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
More information about this book would be helpful. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Doom (book)
[edit]Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating Doom (book).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
A *lot* more information about this book would be helpful.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve The Poisoned City
[edit]Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating The Poisoned City.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
More information about this book is needed.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:150 Glances of The Beatles.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:150 Glances of The Beatles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
superhuman strength
[edit]You need to actually add references to the reviews, not just imply them. DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- I shall move it to draft until there is evidence added to show notability DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Bullshit. Look at the Bookmarks review. Therapyisgood (talk) 23:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve K: A History of Baseball in Ten Pitches
[edit]
Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating K: A History of Baseball in Ten Pitches.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Insufficient references for this book. One review does not meet WP:NBOOK. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Tag dropped on NPP, after checking of references. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of The Bomber Mafia
[edit] Hello! Your submission of The Bomber Mafia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Fulfillment (book) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Fulfillment (book), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 01:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Read the BookMarks reviews and save us both the time before tagging. Therapyisgood (talk) 03:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Fulfillment (book). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. The edit summary at 03:09, 20 June 2021 sat you revert a WP:New page patroller calling them troll which is particularly inappropriate for their function
Fulfillment (book) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Fulfillment (book), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: Noting the discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers#Back to Draft? yours and my re-draftification of this article may have been against guidelines. While Therapyisgood's actions to add three additional citations in response to my (possible inappropriate) draftification was I believe an improvement the response to draftification of resulted in my opinion Wikipedia:TOOMANYREFS and I would support their removal. I'd comment, and if too many RL issues this week for a depth debate, the bigger debate is really is less notability and more if the article has been developed sufficiently to be suitable for an encyclopedia. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Big Game: The NFL in Dangerous Times for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Game: The NFL in Dangerous Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
– PeeJay 17:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
DYK for The Bomber Mafia
[edit]On 22 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Bomber Mafia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Malcolm Gladwell's The Bomber Mafia, about the Bomber Mafia of World War II, concludes that "LeMay won the battle. [...] Hansell won the war" with regard to high-precision aerial bombing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Bomber Mafia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Bomber Mafia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Featured articles
[edit]Hello User talk:Therapyisgood, I saw you kept reverting my good faith edits, and I was hoping you could explain to me the "process" for the Best Featured Actor / Actress in a Play articles. How would the version I added (basically copied from Supporting Actor / Actress articles from Academy Awards, British Academy Film Awards, etc.) get "processed"? Most if not all Awards body articles have the same format as the one I added.The One I Left (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve The Ratline
[edit]Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating The Ratline.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article requires more references, such as independent book reviews and book notes. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Margyl1905.JPG
[edit].jpg)
@Maile66, Gerda Arendt, and LouisAlain: Independent from you I had noticed the erroneous Creative Commons license on File:Margyl1905.JPG and File:Margyl1905 (cropped).JPG and it bugs me as well. The correct license would be "{{PD-old-100-1996}}". But this is an error on Commons, not Wikipedia, so reporting it on Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors doesn't help. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- @BlueMoonset and Drmies: this post is about WP:ERRORS report Not sure what I should do about Commons, if anything. The DYK for Jane Margyl has come and gone on the Main Page. I don't know enough about Commons licensing to deal with this. Alexis Jazz is indef blocked at Commons, so they can't do anything. — Maile (talk) 22:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- User:Maile66, that took me down a really long and twirly rabbit hole. Thanks! Also, I don't do things on Commons, for very good reasons, and I have really nothing to do at all with the image, so I'll have to push the "not my job" button, regrettably. Drmies (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Maile66, in the interest of education I'll explain to you how I arrived at my conclusion: according to the file description the photographer is Nadar. This is confirmed by the signature on File:Margyl1905.JPG. Nadar died in 1910, so per the Copyright law of France his works entered the public domain 70 years later on 1 January 1981. And 1910 is over a 100 years ago. The URAA date for France (on which US copyrights for foreign works were restored) is 1 January 1996. Since the copyright in France had already expired in 1981 no copyright was restored in the US for this photo, hence the "-1996" in "PD-old-100-1996". Even better would actually be "{{PD-old-auto-1996|deathyear=1910|country=France}}", but that's just technicalities. Another option would be {{PD-old-auto-expired|deathyear=1910|country=France}}, but technically we don't have proof the photo was published before 1926 which makes -1996 the safer option in this particular case. If you have copyright questions in the future, feel free to ask.
— Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:23, 8 July 2021 (UTC) - It's moot for us now. Sharper, no deformation (as File:Margyl1905 (cropped).JPG is a photo of a photo) and better license tags. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Thcollet: can you take a look at c:File:Mlle Margyl dans Samson et Dalila.jpg? I had uploaded File:Jane Margyl in Samson et Dalila.jpg here on enwiki as the source for File:Jane Margyl in Samson et Dalila (cropped).jpg, not knowing that you had already uploaded the file from Gallica to Commons. I didn't realize at the time that it was possible to get the original from Gallica (didn't see a download button) so I used the image viewer, resulting in an upscaled file. Magog has imported my upload to Commons and overwritten your non-upscaled version. I would recommend reverting File:Mlle Margyl dans Samson et Dalila.jpg to your version. I can't do it myself but as I uploaded the new version I feel at least partially responsible. I'd ask Magog, but that scares me a bit due to the history. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of George Floyd (American football)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George Floyd (American football) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of George Floyd (American football)
[edit]The article George Floyd (American football) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George Floyd (American football) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of George Floyd (American football)
[edit]The article George Floyd (American football) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:George Floyd (American football) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of George Floyd (American football)
[edit] Hello! Your submission of George Floyd (American football) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! firefly ( t · c ) 16:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
FAC
[edit]I'd be happy to review George Floyd, but obviously I can't do so while your review of the parrot book is open. No rush from my point of view though, it will be at FAC for at least a couple of weeks yet. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Jimfbleak: could you review it now that the parrot review has closed? Thanks in advance-- Therapyisgood (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Bomber Mafia
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bomber Mafia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Bomber Mafia
[edit]The article The Bomber Mafia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Bomber Mafia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Bomber Mafia
[edit]The article The Bomber Mafia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bomber Mafia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK for George Floyd (American football)
[edit]On 3 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George Floyd (American football), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at George Floyd's funeral, a montage mistakenly included a photograph of the still-living former American football player George Floyd? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Floyd (American football). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, George Floyd (American football)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
BookMarks
[edit]I think it's the standard at enWP that a collection of excerpts of reviews from other places is not a suitable source . You have no way of knowing whether the excerpt from the view is representative., and the reader needs to see from the articles itself where the reviews are coming from. You need to cite the actual published reviews, . I' and others have commented on it before with respect to a number of your articles, and I see the situation has not yet been dealt with, so perhaps it needs further discussion. . DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Lewis (baseball) Featured article review
[edit]I have nominated Lewis (baseball) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Promotion of Billy Bates (baseball)
[edit]
DYK nomination of Harry Tombs
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Harry Tombs at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Marcus Lamb
[edit]On 4 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marcus Lamb, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 15:25, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 11:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Charles Allan Marris
[edit]On 11 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Allan Marris, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in The Arraignment of Paris, poet Denis Glover stated Charles Allan Marris was the "arbiter of all our art and letters / presenting rotten apples to his betters"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Allan Marris. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charles Allan Marris), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 01:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Charlie Bartson
[edit]On 16 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charlie Bartson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after getting drunk and verbally abusing Cap Anson at a baseball game during his off day, Charlie Bartson was released from the Chicago Pirates? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charlie Bartson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charlie Bartson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Harry Tombs
[edit]On 18 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harry Tombs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Harry Tombs established the first New Zealand fine-arts press? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Tombs. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Harry Tombs), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Julie Croteau
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Julie Croteau you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Julie Croteau
[edit]The article Julie Croteau you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Julie Croteau for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Genevieve Beacom
[edit]On 2 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Genevieve Beacom, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Genevieve Beacom became the first woman to pitch in the Australian Baseball League when she made her debut for the Melbourne Aces in 2022? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Genevieve Beacom. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Genevieve Beacom), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Julie Croteau
[edit]The article Julie Croteau you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Julie Croteau for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Gragg
[edit]Good catch there! Red Director (talk) 02:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Julie Croteau
[edit]On 8 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Julie Croteau, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Julie Croteau is credited as being the first woman to play National Collegiate Athletic Association men's college baseball? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Julie Croteau. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Julie Croteau), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your share in IWD! I show two who didn't make it, one from Russia and one from Ukraine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| One year! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Ed Travis
[edit]On 31 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ed Travis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after his professional gridiron football career, Ed "Brick" Travis served as president of the Missouri Auto Dealers Association and as president of a local school board? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ed Travis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ed Travis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve Ventilation shutdown
[edit]Hello, Therapyisgood,
Thank you for creating Ventilation shutdown.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article has insufficient information nor references to satisfy notabilty. See WP:BASIC.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 05:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Coffeezilla moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Coffeezilla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Coffeezilla has a new comment
[edit]
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Promotion of Anna Wilson (basketball)
[edit]Congratulations
[edit]
|
The Featured Article Medal | |
| By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 18:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:Coffeezilla
[edit]
Hello, Therapyisgood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coffeezilla, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Coffeezilla
[edit]
Hello, Therapyisgood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Coffeezilla".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Yesterday's error
[edit]Hi! I didn't see it yesterday, but I saw on WP:ERRORS However, Brown lost 3–4 should this be However, Brown lost 4–3?
- in case you were wondering, it's actually part of MOS:CUE, that we put the score of who we are talking about first. It's probably not all that interesting to you, but I thought I'd let you know. :) Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: I've looked at the page but can't find where it specifically says that, but I'll take your word for it. Cheers. Therapyisgood (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Errors
[edit]Hi, I didn't know what your report at Errors meant. I've cleared the whole page; if there is an error, please repost it with a bit more context. Schwede66 01:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
@Schwede66: Look at POTD. There's a "see also" header underneath the POTD which states "See also Template:POTD protected/<(/)noinclude>". That was the error. I apologize, I thought that would be clear to anyone looking at it. Therapyisgood (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)