User talk:Thecleanerand

Thecleanerand, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thecleanerand! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Once again, important and well-sourced material in Game Show Network has been gutted from the article with no discussion on the talk page. My guess is that the same user is doing the gutting as before, though I can't prove it. The repeated allegation of "fan POV" in the edit summary is nonsense. The gutted material accurately reported on important changes in the network over the years. I'm restoring the content. Please discuss major changes in the article on the talk page, so other users can comment on them.--72.180.62.216 (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You appear to have removed WP:RS information on the article The New Era (WWE) based on personal view, including the fact that wrestler Edge was a mutti times world champion, which is important to state otherwise his in ring return would be insignificant like MVP and other returnees, and also the crucial information regarding the return of In Your Hous chronology. As you "at least appear to be" a new editor its fine and WP:AGF applies. But please do not continue this behavior in the future or it may be counted as WP:Disruptive Editing. thank you and wish you a good day. Dilbaggg (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning as you appear to have resumed the behavior, After the third it will be a report and you might even be block. Dilbaggg (talk) 01:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paramount Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MTV Studios. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bomberman (2005 video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chibi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Bomberman has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Using the same summary for every edit you make to a page makes it hard to understand what the edit is made is about. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001 (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Bomberman. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Requesting me and another user to be banned can be seen as a personal attack without valid reasoning. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001 (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fightland (2021)

added links pointing to Tajiri and Myron Reed

VRV (streaming service)

added a link pointing to Gaming

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SMG4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emulation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AMC+, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited G4 (American TV network), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twitch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to OneChanbara (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Yodas henchman (talk) 00:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

I see you've been sanctioned for this in the past, so consider this your final warning. Removing information under the edit summary of 'fanspeak' is unacceptable (along with removing sourced content under the same reasoning), and your edits have been reverted, along with the removal of talk page content. I don't care if you think it's 'idiotic rambling', you never touch talk page contributions made in good faith. Nate • (chatter) 00:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at The Game (American TV series). Nate • (chatter) 06:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sacrifice (2022), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eddie Edwards and Eric Young.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 13:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In your report at AN3 and in your history I see an inappropriately combative approach to other editors and to this project. Please reconsider your approach to editing the encyclopedia and toward other editors. Acroterion (talk) 13:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss my fucking ass. This is not "the encyclopedia", it's a circle jerk of self-righteous, gatekeeping, page-hoarding pricks who think they can do whatever they want even against the site's own rules. I don't respect any of you brain-dead children, and whatever BS privileges you have mean nothing to me. As long as "anyone can edit" this site (at the cost of giving up their IP address), and I adhere to what should be the tried-and-true Cite your sources rule, it's on you to clean up this website so I don't have to. So unless you are an "employee" of the non-profit WikiMedia Foundation, you and everyone else complaining on my talk page can eat shit for all I care. I won't be "inappropriately combative", if the likes of you can avoid being insufferable cancer. Good day, and good fucking riddanceThecleanerand (talk) 18:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then piss off, and let me vent. Thecleanerand (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Intimidation Games (2022)

added a link pointing to Myron Reed

Swerve Strickland

added a link pointing to Myron Reed

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at BET Jams. Calling other editors 'children', along with 'unproductive and useless' is beyond unacceptable and does not contribute to a collaborative environment in any way. I've reverted your talk page contribution as absolutely no good can come out of an interaction with it. Nate • (chatter) 18:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Roku Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Google TV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at Talk:Discovery+. Talk pages are for proper discussion, not to denigrate other editors. I've reverted this new contribution and you are strongly advised to realize that there are other editors here with their own feelings that keep their cool at all times instead of denigrating others. Nate • (chatter) 23:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Vix (streaming service)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vix (streaming service), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make inappropriate or abusive edit summaries or comments, as you did at Rizin Fighting Federation. Nate • (chatter) 00:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lionsgate Canada Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lionsgate Canada Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from MTV into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I added attribution to History of MTV, but please remember to do so going forward. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Thecleanerand (talk) 14:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CFA. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_August_22 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. C F A 💬 01:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Triller

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Category:Triller, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kawa (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Triller has been nominated for deletion

Category:Triller has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. C F A 💬 16:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Egregious incivility from Thecleanerand. Thank you. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 15:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent and gross incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note If you have not already done so, I advise you to have a look at the comments at the ANI discussion and take serious note of the sentiment among your fellow editors. This is almost certainly the one and only block you are going to receive with an expiration date. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A circlejerk of overly-sensitive children who can't handle the fact that Wikipedia has a problem and they're part of it use my "persistent and gross incivility" as an excuse to ban me, and I'm supposed to take note of their sentiment?

Tell those hypocrites:

"Tout my touting trout and trout my trout. Trout every last one of you pathetic, butthurt trouts. Trout your feelings, Trout your hypocritical bias, and above all else, trout you and the trout you crawled out of. You are all cancer, you are everything wrong with this website, and I will never, ever respect you. Take your self-righteous trout and trout. Trouting pricks."

See you in a week. Thecleanerand (talk) 21:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thecleanerand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The admins on this website are immature, selfish and irresponsible. If you criticize their actions and conduct, they get defensive. They simply can't accept when they're in the wrong, so they find any excuse to discredit me, rather than debunk my arguments.

My one and only fault was my inflammatory language, because I'm frustrated with the state of this website. Rather than address my grievances, or let me do that through my work on the site, they take my words and actions out of context because they're too stubborn to even acknowledge that I'm in the right. They would dismiss me as being rude and impolite when they're the ones being disruptive, and reverting my edits without justification. They use mental health as a shield to deflect criticism of their inability to do their jobs. They disrespect me any chance they get, but when I return the sentiment in kind, I'm the one that gets punished. The admins have the nerve to demand an apology from me when they're the ones abusing their power, and when I refused (in my typical colorful demeanor), they instantly turn my suspension into a permaban.

Everything that I've criticized Wikipedia and its admins for are no different to what other people (excluding the perpetually canceled Neo-nazis) have criticized them for; and all this ordeal has done is prove them right. I apologize only for my language and conduct, but I have zero respect for the selfish, short-tempered, bureaucratic children known as Wikipedia admins.

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thecleanerand (talk) 00:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]