User talk:The Young Prussian

This is The Young Prussian's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced. Please do not resubmit again without adding sources (see WP:REFB for help). Very doubtful that this meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for lists anyway.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 20:45, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Young Prussian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spicy (talk) 20:45, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This does not seem like a suitable topic for a list. We would need reliable sources that discuss the whole list as one cohesive topic, not different reliable sources that discuss each item on the list in isolation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 22:57, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of people with confirmation of controversial existence among altaic peoples, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 22:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of semi-legendary personalities among Altaic peoples (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nitesh003 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resolve previous issues before resubmitting the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of semi-legendary personalities among Altaic peoples and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of semi-legendary personalities among Altaic peoples, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nitesh003 (TALK) 12:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yujiulü Mugulü, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Young Prussian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All changes made to the "Khagan" and "Bumin Qaghan" pages were in good faith and there is no reason for my blocking, as they had source and context and were only removed because of the displeasure of other users who, without convincing reason, deliberately reversed my changes. The Young Prussian (talk) 22:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were unambiguously edit warring. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Young Prussian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All changes made to the "Khagan" and "Bumin Qaghan" pages were in good faith and there is no reason for my blocking, as they had source and context and were only removed because of the displeasure of other users who, without convincing reason, deliberately reversed my changes. The Young Prussian (talk) 22:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC) The Young Prussian (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--> Other users have reverted my changes, WITH NO PLAUSIBLE JUSTIFICATION, my changes truly had sources and context. The Young Prussian (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--> The user Beshogur reversing changes with source and context on pages "Rouran Khaganate", "Bumin Qaghan and "Khagan", please see the Revision history of these pages. The Young Prussian (talk) 00:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. You seem to also be trying to justify your edit warring instead of telling us what was wrong with it. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 01:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of semi-legendary personalities among Altaic peoples (November 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Noted issues have not been addressed.

S0091 (talk) 20:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of semi-legendary personalities among Altaic peoples

Hello, The Young Prussian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of semi-legendary personalities among Altaic peoples".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Northern Court, you may be blocked from editing. I don't know what you were going for. The national anthem for a 14th-c reign? Sourced to this? What even is that website? Drmies (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azuchi–Momoyama period, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:在 calligraphie.png

Thanks for uploading File:在 calligraphie.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:其 calligraphie.png

Thanks for uploading File:其 calligraphie.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:私 calligraphie.png

Thanks for uploading File:私 calligraphie.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:、 calligraphie.png

Thanks for uploading File:、 calligraphie.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:。 calligraphie.png

Thanks for uploading File:。 calligraphie.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:取 calligraphie.png

Thanks for uploading File:取 calligraphie.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:The Young Prussian/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:The Young Prussian/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 18:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Secret Ambition (Michael W. Smith song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Secret Ambition (Michael W. Smith song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wired for Sound (Michael W. Smith single) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wired for Sound (Michael W. Smith single), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wired for Sound (Michael W. Smith single) (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wired for Sound (Michael W. Smith single) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secret Ambition (Michael W. Smith song) (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Secret Ambition (Michael W. Smith song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Unforgiven (song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 20:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Unblack metal, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:STRANGE AEONS cover art.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:STRANGE AEONS cover art.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Japanese blackened kawaii metal musical groups

A tag has been placed on Category:Japanese blackened kawaii metal musical groups indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:STRANGE AEONS cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:STRANGE AEONS cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:！ calligraphie.png

Thank you for uploading File:！ calligraphie.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lü gate.png

The file File:Lü gate.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, replaceable by text, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Slayer, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit archived pages

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Metallica/Archive 4. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ARCHIVED PAGES - FlightTime (open channel) 01:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring Again

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Metallica. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit editwarring also stop making arguments in edit summaries, that's what talk pages are for. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You have been edit warring repeatedly at the article Metallica. You need to stop. I see you are discussing at the talk page; that is good. Continue to discuss and try to reach consensus. But in the meantime, do not keep inserting your own version into the article without agreement from other editors to do so. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tomboy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomboy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomboy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Springnuts (talk) 18:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tomboy article militancy

Hi, I saw you added partial speech and militancy to the issues with the tomboy article. If you're referring to the aggressive political tone in much of the new additions I agree it should be made more npov. I am trying to fix the tone in general, any help is appreciated 24.44.73.34 (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wired for Sound (Michael W. Smith single)

Hello, The Young Prussian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wired for Sound (Michael W. Smith single), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Secret Ambition (Michael W. Smith song)

Hello, The Young Prussian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Secret Ambition (Michael W. Smith song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Euronymous with his cockatoo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Euronymous with his cockatoo.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Euronymous. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wired for Sound (Michael W. Smith single)

Hello, The Young Prussian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wired for Sound".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Secret Ambition (Michael W. Smith song)

Hello, The Young Prussian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Secret Ambition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blue Cheer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But it is present in the Summertime Blues page "While not as widely played or recognized as The Who's version, it certainly is more distorted". The Young Prussian (talk) 01:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia cannot be used as a source because it fails WP:USERG. Anybody can edit Wikipedia, which means it's unreliable.

Specifically, that bit about being distorted was added by an IP editor who cited a YouTube video, which means the IP editor was listening to the song and analyzing it himself, violating WP:No original research. That's why Wikipedia cannot be trusted. Binksternet (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consort Yeonje moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Consort Yeonje, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Emit (English band)

Hello, The Young Prussian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emit (English band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Family tree of Hungarian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Consort Yeonje

Hello, The Young Prussian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Consort Yeonje, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Voiceless uvular nasal has been accepted

Voiceless uvular nasal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nardog (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Voiceless dental and alveolar lateral fricatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Baxter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Voiced bidental fricative (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Voiced bidental fricative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption

Do not submit unblock templates for other users, especially when you clearly do not understand the case. -- ferret (talk) 19:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You know the regulations don't prohibit this. The Young Prussian (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Failed verification

On which pages do Halle (2005) or Ladefoged (1990) discuss the presence of a palatal tap or flap in Dagaare? Nardog (talk) 21:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Voiced palatal tap and flap for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voiced palatal tap and flap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voiced palatal tap and flap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nardog (talk) 21:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Voiced epiglottal trill, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism, and the symbol is considered one of several implicit symbols in the IPA chart.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Extended_IPA_chart_2005.svg The Young Prussian (talk) 23:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is a "freely improvised" chart that inspired the IPA to release the official chart under a CC license. Regardless, you cannot base your edits on other user-generated content (see WP:CIRCULAR). Nardog (talk) 00:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the nth time, please stop misrepresenting sources or passing them as if they verify your claim without checking them yourself. Nardog (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The UPSID proves the attestation of the symbol. The Young Prussian (talk) 14:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of the symbol, yes. Now show us the evidence that it represents an alveolo-palatal approximant. Nardog (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Y-chromosomal Adam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haplogroup A.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fluoroanion

Hi, I removed trifluorolithate from the fluoroanion list as it does not appear to be in use as a term. If you can find such an ion please add a reference to support it. Also trifluoroaluminate is an oxofluoroanion and perhaps is out of scope for the list. Maybe there should be a separate list of oxofluoroanions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient information to identify cited sources

What are the sources "Wilkinson 2003" and "Tsumura 2022, p. 255" which you've cited here? – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]