User talk:TheKaphox/Archive 1

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	OKKK, I know this is like really inappropriate, but like FREEDUN is BAE. Honestly after Bird Song, I was kinda conflicted but now I'm like YASSSSSSS. Whatever, just needed to fanboy. Felt like giving u a random barnstar, whatever. Esmost ^πк 20:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi TheKaphox, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ms Lauryn Hill listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ms Lauryn Hill. Since you had some involvement with the Ms Lauryn Hill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Lauryn Hill listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ms. Lauryn Hill. Since you had some involvement with the Ms. Lauryn Hill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at c:User talk:TheKaphox#File source is not properly indicated: File:Nintendo Switch Logo.svg

You are invited to join the discussion at c:User talk:TheKaphox#File source is not properly indicated: File:Nintendo Switch Logo.svg. — Gestrid (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong close/Revert

I have only reverted that meant by wrongdoing. Let the vote process decide to Keep or Delete. You participated as Keep Vote. It is not correct approach to Keep by your self. People have put effort to give significant discussions. Let it be independent. Previous Keep close was questionable. Light2021 (talk) 17:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Light2021: The discussion has been open for 10 days. Please read WP:AFD. It has been open for long enough, a community consensus has been reached, and the discussion can be closed. I'm sorry that you didn't get the result you would've hoped for, but you shouldn't revert the closure of an AfD discussion. There are six votes to keep, and three to delete. That is enough of a consensus. TheKaphox T 17:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Definitely I can see and everybody can see your line of discussions as well as Keep vote and hoe it has been done. No substance why anyone keep this. I am sorry it is disappointing to you, as you yourself reached the consenses and interpreted the result and closed yourself where you voted as keep. Light2021 (talk) 17:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Light2021: How can you determine the result as anything other than keep? Can you count? TheKaphox T 17:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - As per the Wikipedia, counting votes are not the tool for measurement. the person who is for "Keep" or "Delete" can not close the AfD. It must be done by someone else, or by Admins for fair decisions. Every one has right to express their view with freedom. But the last close made by the questionable editor who were merely counting votes or relisting articles who were nominated/voted for delete, as seen and investigated by others as well. That is the only reason I reverted, else I will never revert any Keep or Delete decision if made by consensus or neutral point of view. and I don't determine what to keep or delete. It is community decision finally that I respect, and I do what I do. :)Light2021 (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - @Light2021: See, an admin has no closed the debate, and the result was keep. What was the need for you to cause unnecessary hassle? TheKaphox T 00:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Cranfield

I see you added an AfD tag to John Cranfield but you haven't created the actual deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cranfield. If you don't create the discussion the AfD tag will be removed from the article. -- GB fan 21:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GB fan: Sorry! I just completed the process. My apologies. TheKaphox T 21:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice

Just letting you know, incase the notifications did not ping you, I included you at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring board against the user currently editing at Nightride as someone they are edit-warring against. livelikemusic talk! 20:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genius as a reliable source

Sorry but there's nothing to debate here. I accept the unability of social media to be a reliable source, but as the user on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#Genius as a reliable source said, is an open-wiki, that's the reasons why it's unreliable. You're basicaly ignoring what any user could think except you and your Wikipedia friends. I can ask an admin if you want. I'm not stupid. Anonpediann (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P.D: anybodys discusing anything because its too clear. And where's someone discusing Sacrifices as a single? Who even said something about releasing the song as a single? Anonpediann (talk) 21:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not ignore anyone - hence why I'm participating in a (hopefully constructive) discussion on the Nightride talk page. Inferring that I would ignore anyone, and saying that I'm merely aligning alongside my "Wikipedia friends", violates WP:PERSONAL. I appreciate the comments of the user at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums, and I have invited him to voice his thoughts in the discussion at Talk:Nightride. Thanks, TheKaphox T 21:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop threating me and answer to my questions? Fundamentals of Sacrifice being a single? Genius being reliable being an open wiki? Anonpediann (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How have I threatened you? I did not add that "Sacrifices" was a single, so I do not know why you are asking me about that. Regarding Genius, it is more reliable than some dubious Twitter comments. When I added the reference, there were absolutely no references for the producer credits. There are definitely more reliable sources, but none have been cited thus far. TheKaphox T 21:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But you and Livelikemusic keep tearing down my intents of clearing that Sacrifice is not a single and another fake credit that i cleared up, being said its an Edit warring just beacuse without researching what i modified you tear down all my edits, being some of them attached to it. It affects me of course because they can block me for that. You know more sources? I can't find more. If you know, just show them up, please! Don't you just want the page to be better? Anonpediann (talk) 21:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is about whether Genius is a reliable source or not. There are more reliable websites than it, but at the moment, there aren't any for Nightride. TheKaphox T 21:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover granted

Hello TheKaphox. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 19:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slumber Party (song)

Great point; well made. Do you want to seek out a Speedy justification for the image file? ... richi (hello) 20:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Richi: There isn't any speedy justification for the file, as far as I can see. It will be deleted shortly due to being an orphaned file. Thanks, TheKaphox T 20:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aa (album)

Hey! Umm... I was wondering if you could help out with this article. It's obviously underwritten, but I literally can't put any effort into any articles about albums I haven't listened to. Anyways, I'd really appreciate it if you helped expand it. Thanks! Є𐌔ⲘО𐌔𐍄 ^{𐍄𐌀ℓК} 19:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Matahdatah Scroll 01 "Broader Than a Border".jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Matahdatah Scroll 01 "Broader Than a Border".jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TheKaphox. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marking major edits as minor

I asked another user earlier to not mark edits where they are adding substantial amounts of content as minor, and it appears you're doing the same thing. Adding 1 KB of a data to a page (such as Maluma here) is in no way a minor edit. WP:MINOR states: "A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, formatting and presentational changes, and rearrangements of text without modification of its content. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." I originally noticed this on "I Would Like", where you added categories and marked a significant addition of content as minor. Please only use the minor edit checkbox when you make actual minor edits of changing several bytes of data, like fixing typographical errors. Ss 112 12:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: I marked the Maluma and I Would Like edits as minor because a vandal had removed the infobox, I was simply re-adding it, and because I was only making format changes to the infobox on I Would Like - i.e. using hlist and adding links. I appreciate your concern still, and I will definitely take it into account in the future. Thanks, TheKaphox T 12:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyoncé - Don't Hurt Yourself.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beyoncé - Don't Hurt Yourself.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MØ - XXX 88.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MØ - XXX 88.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kylie Minogue, Essential Mixes.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue, Essential Mixes.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Classic Cher Tour Poster.png

Thanks for uploading File:Classic Cher Tour Poster.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creating unnecessary redirects for Kylie Minogue songs

Was it really necessary to create hundred of redirects for Kylie Minogue songs from all of her albums? I thought you said last year that you were going to create redirects in moderation and with the implication to create them when they were helpful, not create redirects adding "(song)" and "(Kylie Minogue song)" to the titles of articles that don't need them and probably never will. You went way overboard on this one, and I think you need to chill out with the redirect creation. Redirects for songs from a new album or a project you're working on, yes. Hundreds of redirects for old songs, no. Ss 112 07:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: I understand where you're coming from - however, I disagree. I don't think that the release date of an album should affect whether a redirect is made. If an album came out in 2017, the non-notable songs from that album should be redirected towards it, as would an album released in 2001. Every redirect I made was a valid term, and helpful to those who were trying to find that particular song. Thanks, TheKaphox T 11:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My main concern was not how old it is. Also, they are not valid search terms, because most readers who are not editors do not type in "(song)" or any disambiguation appended to the title of a page. If they typed in Especially for You, they'd find it immediately. You creating redirects like Especially for You (song) anyway if not on the generated search results page; or c) if they are editors, be thinking those are necessary. By even being able to create redirects with "(song)" and "(Kylie Minogue song)" added, you are essentially confirming there are no other songs of those titles, so nobody has a need to type in any additional disambiguation. Since there are no other songs of those names, you just created at least 200 entirely useless redirects that will most likely never have any use. If there is another song that gains notability as a song called "Especially for You", your redirect would be deleted in order to move the page there anyway, again rendering your creation of it now useless. I think you are still unaware of the right time to create redirects and when is not. Ss 112 15:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with TheKaphox here. Nothing wrong with creating redirects for valid terms. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I see there's a discussion. @Another Believer: if the redirect is (Kylie Minogue song) then fine, but not (song). I have corrected Mr. President (song) and Sleeping with the Enemy (song) to redirect to the dab pages. Other songs exist. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise Mighty Rivers. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to add a third comment I Feel for You (song) already has a Prince song at I Feel for You, I have changed redirect which was created from Kylie album to Prince song. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for an Angel can you please help with fixing the others? Not getting at you. Cheers and thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: Yes, I will get on to it soon. Thanks, TheKaphox T 18:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: There's no reason anybody would be typing in Especially for You (song) or Especially for You (Kylie Minogue song) when Especially for You already exists and there's no other notable song by that name. They're not valid. Can you think up a reason? Because I can't. Ss 112 22:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap, and we are spending more time discussing these harmless redirects than working on more important Wikipedia tasks. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: That's an essay, not a policy. Neelix got in trouble with this a few years ago. Sure, his redirects were more ridiculous but the general consensus from editors was hundreds of redirects that get no hits from visitors helps nobody. Y'all don't wanna go down this path of creating hundreds of unnecessary redirects. If you think you can't ever be reprimanded or questioned because "I was trying to help out", I think you're mistaken. Ss 112 22:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Correct, it is an essay and not policy - however the essay accurately reflects my views on the matter, and I assume that of User:Another Believer too. TheKaphox T 22:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I'm not going to argue about this any more, I have more important tasks to tackle. Life goes on just fine whether or not the redirects are deleted, I'm just expressing my opinion that redirects are fine. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are fine, when created in moderation. Hundreds upon hundreds of them, trying to account for every little thing you think people are going to type in (but actually won't, because the claim here is that you're trying to help out readers, not other editors, and they have no reason to type in "(song)" or "(Kylie Minogue song)" themselves if they can find the article to begin with), however, are not. Ss 112 22:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Conchita self-titled album.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conchita self-titled album.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the image file you uploaded is a duplicate of a file that already exists, which should never have happened in the first place. Uploading a duplicate and tagging the original as orphaned is unacceptable conduct. The duplicate png file qualifies for speedy deletion under the F1 criteria. Please refrain from attempting to disrupt Wikipedia by file warring. Regards, Wes Mouse ^Talk 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Wesley Mouse: Hello. The image may have seemed as though it was simply a duplication, however the new image I uploaded is superior - as it uses .png - which is the preferred file type for album/single cover artwork. Please see WP:MoS/Images. Regards, TheKaphox T 16:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No where in WP:MoS/Images does it stipulate that png is far superior to jpeg files. It does however, state that both versions are as useful as each other. Perhaps linking the png version on the original jpeg file to show that other versions are available, thus neither versions will become orphaned. Wes Mouse ^Talk 12:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: House of Music

Hello there. Would you care to review or comment at my nomination of House of Music for featured status? The previous nomination did not gather enough commentary, so anything at all would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 07:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Architects (song)

Hello. In regards to NSONGS for this song, in my opinion, this song qualifies as notable because it fulfills criteria number two: The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart.

While I do agree this article is a work in progress, I believe that it shouldn't be reverted to the album. If the problem is a lack of sources, I have located some sources that require looking through and adding. Thanks. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Conchita self-titled album.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conchita self-titled album.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Nomination of Valentina (drag queen) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valentina (drag queen) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentina (drag queen) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcat: Thanks for the alert, however I only created the redirect. TheKaphox T 22:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, Twinkle is programmed to notify the original creator of the page, and doesn't know how to distinguish "created an article" from "created a redirect and then somebody else converted it into an article". My apologies, but it's an automated part of the process which I had no power to stop or to redirect the notification to someone else — it came to you because that's what Twinkle is programmed to do. Complaints have been filed about this in the past with the Twinkle programmers, because what happened here isn't exactly rare, but I don't think there's any easy way to fix it. Bearcat (talk) 02:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Me Enamoré

Just letting you know, I've redirected Me enamoré to José Feliciano's album, as the only difference is the capital E, and that album also contains a song of the same name. I see you also created Me enamoré!, which I think is a "stylisation" exclusive to the cover, as no other outlet uses the exclamation mark. Ss 112 06:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Del Rey - Lust For Life album cover

I made a mistake while uploading the cover, I didn't know that it couldn't be used at all when uploaded that way and I believe that I didn't fill in the information correctly. Do you know how to fix it? I just wanted to add the one from her Facebook page because it's higher quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redandsymmetry (talk • contribs) 01:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kylie Minogue - A Kylie Christmas.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue - A Kylie Christmas.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tribal (album)

Not sure if you saw, but your move of Imelda's Tribal (album) was reverted by a user as another album exists of that title (despite having no article). Ss 112 03:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to all registered editors at RuPaul's Drag Race and Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race this year (2017) that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RuPaul's American

RuPaul's record label is RuCo Inc. It's the same label for the majority of his previous releases. You can check those pages yourself. Furthermore, the linked RuCo that you keep reverting back to has nothing to do with the label. Please stop reverting. Partyclams (talk) 16:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Farrah Moan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Farrah Moan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 04:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Farrah Moan, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have this thing called WP:DRAFT. Putting a template on a non notable subject's article does not immunize it from deletion. Appearing on a reality show is not a claim of notability. John from Idegon (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon: Move it to draft. TheKaphox T 14:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farrah Moan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farrah Moan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farrah Moan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift Maxim Magazine Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor Swift Maxim Magazine Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chloe x Halle - The Two of Us.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chloe x Halle - The Two of Us.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cymbal (app) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cymbal (app) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cymbal (app) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cymbal Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cymbal Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cymbal.fm Screenshot.jpg (2016).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cymbal.fm Screenshot.jpg (2016).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move review for Damn (Kendrick Lamar album)

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift - Reputation.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor Swift - Reputation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Chase (talk | contributions) 22:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of songs recorded by Fergie (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Fergie discography instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of songs recorded by Fergie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TheKaphox, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fergie - Double Dutchess.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fergie - Double Dutchess.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TheKaphox. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billie Piper - Last Christmas.png

Hello. I decided to propose deletion on File:Billie Piper - Last Christmas.png. Feel free to remove please if you object. Thanks. George Ho (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More images at Last Christmas

I decided to PROD more images that you uploaded for Last Christmas. Please feel free to remove the tags if you object. Here are the following:

George Ho (talk) 21:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of songs recorded by Fergie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of songs recorded by Fergie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<span style="border: 1px #e5e5e7 solid;background:#32323e;padding:1px">[[User:TheKaphox|<font color="#e5e5e7">TheKaphox</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:TheKaphox|<font color="#e5c100">T</font>]]</span>

: TheKaphox T

to

<span style="border: 1px #e5e5e7 solid;background:#32323e;padding:1px">[[User:TheKaphox|<span style="color: #e5e5e7">TheKaphox</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:TheKaphox|<span style="color: #e5c100">T</span>]]</span>

: TheKaphox T

—Anomalocaris (talk) 09:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please take care of this now? Most users comply with these requests to bring signatures into compliance. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 15:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of songs recorded by Fergie

Hello, TheKaphox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of songs recorded by Fergie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fergie - London Bridge Alternative.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fergie - London Bridge Alternative.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:M.O - Who Do You Think Of?.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:M.O - Who Do You Think Of?.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stevie Wonder - Faith.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stevie Wonder - Faith.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TheKaphox. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disco

My cousin alerted me today to a strange fact on the Kylie Minogue 'Got To Be Certain' page: the song was referred to as a 'disco song'. He edited the page and, as the song has always been classed as dance pop before and is clearly not disco, inserted the correct information. I took a look through the history and discovered you have altered the reference from 'pop dance' to 'disco' without explanation over a few years whenever the wrongful information is corrected. Not sure why. I checked the link at AllMusic which does not refer to the song as 'disco'. While disco was undergoing something of a revival in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, 'Got To Be Certain' was never part of that and the link you used does not list it as that. Please do not alter information without reliable citations - which do not include opinion pieces in local newspapers. Thank you.

(Mr Dog 1982 (talk) 16:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Nomination of The X Tour (Christina Aguilera) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The X Tour (Christina Aguilera) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The X Tour (Christina Aguilera) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ColinFine (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:B'Day (Beyoncé album) tracks

Template:B'Day (Beyoncé album) tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hi. I don't know if I've asked you this before, but can you please add material supporting the redirect you have made at the article you're pointing it to? Yes, Grimes did announce Miss Anthrpocene, however, that title is not mentioned at Grimes discography. Please add material supporting the redirect you have just made at where you're pointing it to. No mention of the title at the target is often a reason given for deletion at WP:RFD. Thank you. Ss112 16:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls Aloud - Beautiful 'Cause You Love Me.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girls Aloud - Beautiful 'Cause You Love Me.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Fergie (singer)

Portal:Fergie (singer), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Fergie (singer) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Fergie (singer) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 13:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls Aloud - Beautiful 'Cause You Love Me.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girls Aloud - Beautiful 'Cause You Love Me.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A few questions on your recent edits to ORION

Hello! I noticed a few of your edits on the ORION album article, and I had a few questions. Firstly, your claim that Litost is X Ambassadors’ debut album. Notice that on the page for VHS, it states that VHS is their debut album. That is supported by the fact that the band themselves have stated that VHS is their debut album. Secondly, your de-stylization of KIDinaKORNER. On all other articles that refer to that label, including the article for KIDinaKORNER, the stylization is used. I would like to know why you change those two things only on the article for ORION, but no other article. WildChild300 (talk) 10:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@WildChild300: Thank you for your comments. Orion is X Ambassadors' third album, thank you for pointing out the innacuracies on the VHS article. I will correct them shortly. As for the stylisation of Kidinakorner, we do not use the CamelCase format, as guided in MOS:CAMELCASE. Thanks. TheKaphox T 14:36, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your unnecessary moving of Kylie Minogue images

Hi. This policing of images relating to Kylie Minogue is unnecessary and you need to stop. It really just seems like you're looking for things to do relating to Kylie Minogue because you are a fan of her. You are citing WP:FNC#6, however that clearly doesn't apply. Images for each one of Minogue's singles or albums is not what "set of images" is referring to here; it clearly states "Harmonize file names of a set of images (so that only one part of all names differs) to ease their usage in templates (e.g. diagram symbols, scans of pages of a book, maps)". These images are not icons being used in templates or somewhere where they are all grouped together. You additionally cited WP:FNC#5 when moving the artwork for Minogue's Sleepwalker EP with Garibay because it was "incorrect"—nothing was incorrect, you just didn't credit Garibay when you uploaded it. Omission is not always error. As long as the file name is clear and not ambiguous, you do not need to move it. I'm aware you uploaded a fair few of those images yourself, but this is just unnecessary and I think if you continue to do so, you're blatantly misusing your additional rights as a file mover. File moving as a tool does not exist to make all image file names uploaded for an artist's works consistent and pretty to set fans' minds at ease. Ss112 18:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: I hear your point, I understand and will not continue to act in this manner. I never intended to abuse my file moving permissions, my main aim was to organise a set of images, however I now understand that this is not the use of WP:FNC#6. Apologies for the ordeal, and I will not do this in the future. I will continue, however, in my work to replace jpg/jpeg artwork with png artwork where possible and where superior. Thanks TheKaphox T 19:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kylie Minogue - Darling EP.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue - Darling EP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kylie Minogue - Greatest Video Hits.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue - Greatest Video Hits.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Lil Nas X

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Lil Nas X requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --wooden superman 08:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kylie and Garibay

Template:Kylie and Garibay has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 10:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Zhavia Ward

Template:Zhavia Ward has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rather Be (song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rather Be (song). Since you had some involvement with the Rather Be (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — Newslinger talk 02:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Queen of Katwe Soundtrack.jpg

The file File:Queen of Katwe Soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Queen of Katwe#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emeli Sandé - Long Live the Angels Deluxe.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emeli Sandé - Long Live the Angels Deluxe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grace Carter (singer)

The article Grace Carter (singer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Laun chba ller 20:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: The article has a variety of reliable sources. Was this a mistake? TheKaphox T 21:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, because at the time I prodded the article there were no sources in the article. It wasn't until I checked the history that I discovered that they had been removed by a vandal a couple of months ago. For future reference, please spread out your references, because only one of the four references contained "Paul Phillips".--Laun chba ller 22:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:A Kylie Christmas – Live from the Royal Albert Hall 2015.png

Thank you for uploading File:A Kylie Christmas – Live from the Royal Albert Hall 2015.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 January 10 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:A Kylie Christmas Tour Poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:A Kylie Christmas Tour Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alicia Keys - Raise a Man.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alicia Keys - Raise a Man.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janelle Monáe - Q.U.E.E.N (Remixes).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janelle Monáe - Q.U.E.E.N (Remixes).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Albums produced by Alex Hope has been nominated for merging

Category:Albums produced by Alex Hope, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kylie Minogue - Slow.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue - Slow.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Irelia" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Irelia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 18#Irelia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pandakekok9 (talk) 03:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adore You (Jessie Ware song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adore You (Jessie Ware song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adore You (Jessie Ware song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Overtime (Jessie Ware song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Overtime (Jessie Ware song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overtime (Jessie Ware song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jessie Ware - Adore You.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie Ware - Adore You.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jessie Ware - Overtime.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie Ware - Overtime.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:League of Legends logo 2019.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:League of Legends logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Two of Us (mixtape) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Two of Us (mixtape) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Two of Us (mixtape) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Merry Christmas Lil' Mama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Merry Christmas Lil' Mama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merry Christmas Lil' Mama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Illaoi" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Illaoi. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 18#Illaoi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 02:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Chloe Bailey

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Chloe Bailey a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Chlöe. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Status (talk · contribs) 14:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kylie Minogue - Golden Boy.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue - Golden Boy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Channelisles.net Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Channelisles.net Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Jhin (League of Legends)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Jhin (League of Legends). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 12#Jhin (League of Legends) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Cho'gath" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cho'gath. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 15#Cho'gath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Corki" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Corki. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 15#Corki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Kha'Zix" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kha'Zix. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#Kha'Zix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Annie (League of Legends)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Annie (League of Legends). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#Annie (League of Legends) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 01:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Annie, the Dark Child" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Annie, the Dark Child. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#Annie, the Dark Child until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 01:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Annie the Dark Child" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Annie the Dark Child. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#Annie the Dark Child until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 01:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Le Blanc (League of Legends)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Le Blanc (League of Legends). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#Le Blanc (League of Legends) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 17:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Leblanc (League of Legends)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Leblanc (League of Legends). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#Leblanc (League of Legends) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 17:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"LeBlanc (League of Legends)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect LeBlanc (League of Legends). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#LeBlanc (League of Legends) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 17:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RuPaul - American.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RuPaul - American.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Aurelion Sol" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aurelion Sol. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 14#Aurelion Sol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Tahm Kench" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tahm Kench. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 15#Tahm Kench until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Mordekaiser" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mordekaiser. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 18#Mordekaiser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Cascada - Last Christmas.png

The file File:Cascada - Last Christmas.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Easily conveyed in text, or insufficiently supported by critical commentary. Not contextually significant to the Christmas hit song by Wham!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucie Jones - Never Give Up On You.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucie Jones - Never Give Up On You.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Mainstream Sellout Tour.png

Thanks for uploading File:Mainstream Sellout Tour.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]