Jump to content

User talk:SilverLocust/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, SilverLocust! Thank you for your contributions. I am GeneralizationsAreBad and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! GABHello! 02:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SilverLocust. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rust v. Sullivan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fifth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SilverLocust. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stop and identify statutes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warrant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:COVID-19 religion cases in the U.S. Supreme Court has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:COVID-19 religion cases in the U.S. Supreme Court. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: COVID-19 religion cases in the U.S. Supreme Court (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs additional inline citations for verification.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
––FormalDude talk 00:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, SilverLocust! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ––FormalDude talk 00:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:COVID-19 religion cases in the U.S. Supreme Court

Information icon Hello, SilverLocust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:COVID-19 religion cases in the U.S. Supreme Court, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisa Blatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockhart v. United States.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Major questions doctrine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Griffith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Miscellaneous comment

You seem like a fascinating person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monoman38 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Das Kapital move request

Hi! It appears you've appended your comment in the middle of my move request. Assuming that wasn't intentional, I've moved it down. Cheers! :3 F4U (they/it) 00:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Giannalberto Bendazzi

hi I must thank you for your good faith.

However, your understanding of Mr. Giannalberto Bendazzi's book is wrong.He says this in his book about the burnt city cup “Many sources refer to this cup and the images on it as the first animation in history for example : An animated piece on an earthen goblet that belongs to 5000 years ago! was found in Burnt City in sistan-Baluchistan province, south-eastern iran. on this ancient piece that can be called the first animation of the world, the artist has portrayed a goat that jumps toward a tree and eats its leaves.... On this goblet, with a diameter of 8 cm and height of 10 cm. the images show movement in an intricate way that is an unprecedented discovery. Some earthenware found in Burnt City show repetitive images, but none of them implicate any movements”[1]

I think the text you added is about other works of art found in this ancient city. I hope you will take another look at this book and comment again. Thank you Mitrayasna (talk) 16:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Mitrayasna

References

  1. ^ G Bendazzi (2015). Animation: A World History. p. 7.

Talk:Killing of Yassar Yaqub

Hey, I believe you jumped the gun on closing this. RMs should be open for discussion for at least seven days. 162 etc. (talk) 15:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

I think I misread the date. Thanks. {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 20:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Enric Bernat

Have gone ahead and made the page moves that resulted from your close at Talk:Enric Bernat (businessman)#Requested move 27 June 2023. In the future, if you are unable for any reason to make a page move after closing a move request, you can ask for a page mover or admin to help you at WP:RMTR. Thank you for your edits and for your help with page move requests! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 08:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

@P.I. Ellsworth: Thanks. I requested a speedy deletion with Template:Db-move, but an admin (Liz) denied it. I asked about it at her talk page, but have not received a response. {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 08:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Ah, okay. I let Liz know that I went ahead with the page moves, and I see that you let Liz know that I've retagged the dab page with a speedy. We'll see what happens. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 08:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 08:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Requesting closure

I have closed the Jeopardy move review, but for future reference closure requests are best made at Wikipedia:Closure requests and, unless the consensus is unarguably obvious, should be neutrally worded. Thryduulf (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

All right, thanks. {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 23:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Unperformed move?

Hello, you just closed this move request with a move result, but the page hasn't actually been moved. What happened there? 〜 Festucalex • talk 11:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Never mind, I just saw your technical request. 〜 Festucalex • talk 11:37, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 9, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:22, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Ah, sorry. I didn't think to include a reference for that aside on a CFD page. I could have left that part out or included some very easily available reliable sources from news sites like Kotaku. {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 05:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Murder in Mississippi

Please could you relist this one? There was a strong consensus against moving in 2020, and the film is very clearly the primary topic by page views. I don't see any reason why the rationales explored back then are different now. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 10:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Ah, on second thoughts never mind... I didn't even consider Murder in Mississippi (painting) in the previous analysis. There isn't a primary topic, so the move is good. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 10:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

AS Val and VSS Vintorez

Hello, SilverLocust! I gave a reply to your comment on my requested move. Shall I proceed to start a new RM discussion or should it be moved automatically? Since my request is to simply revert the changes made by user Guns & Glory. VSS Vintorez and AS Val was the tittle given by user KnowledgeableHrvatica (talk) when the user made the merge. JTC22 (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

This user has been blocked. SilverLocust 💬 09:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, SilverLocust. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Emily Austin

Thanks for your comment on the page move discussion. I gave the good fight and lost and that's fair enough - sometimes it doesn't go your way. Question though - you mentioned WP:PT2. Hypothetically speaking, as her career progresses and whatnot, what would she have to do to qualify as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC? Cause there may become a point where she achieves it. I'm curious to know what this point may be. Thank you MaskedSinger (talk) 18:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

@MaskedSinger: I agree that she may well become the primary topic. While I couldn't firmly predict how others would see it, my sense is that this would be more likely to come from more contributions of the sort outlined in WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENT than from being an influencer. (These sorts of notability discussions tend to be quite skeptical of the lasting significance of online popularity.) SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation. Appreciate it! MaskedSinger (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

rollback

Hi SilverLocust. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live rebision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, Beeblebrox! SilverLocust 💬 18:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

PCM

I see you are copying my "PCM" note on RM/TR. I'll take that as a compliment. I've been using {{subst:User:UtherSRG/PCM}} - ~~~~ as a means of reducing what I type and being consistent. If it's an IP user, I've been manually inserting a note about removing the request after a day, though I get some flack for that. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

@UtherSRG: I hope I haven't been intruding upon your intellectual property! I hadn't gotten around to writing something original, and I thought it might be slightly inconvenient to you when I contest a request without writing a message about how to open an RM. (I did see the flack from the other day.) SilverLocust 💬 18:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
On the contrary, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, eh? By all means, carry on! - UtherSRG (talk) 18:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

(Comments regarding a sockpuppet report)

Extended content

Hello SilverLocust, why have you added my IP address as a suspected sockpuppet just because my edits were similar to the one done by the sockpuppet. I am innocent and I hope I will not be blocked. 103.87.143.119 (talk) 00:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

I hope you aren't blocked if you aren't the same person as the previously blocked account. But the final decision isn't up to me; someone else will have to decide the matter. That being said, your current IP address is not the as the ones I reported. Where did you see that you had been reported? SilverLocust 💬 01:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Removal of SPI Checkuser from my account

Hello SilverLocust, why have you demanded an SPI checkuser on my account just because my edits were similar to the suspected sockpuppet Kajal1985srivastav. You can check my IP Address and Kajal1985srivastav's IP address. Both are different IP address and my interest in editing a certain topic can also be similar to the interest of Kajal1985srivastav. Just bacause my edita are similar to Kajal1985srivastav which is a coincidence that does not make me a suspected on confirmed sockpuppet of Kajal1985srivastav. I hope and am earnestly requesting you to please withdraw the SPI checkuser on my account because I am innocent and have not done any disconstructive edits. I hope that I will not be blocked from editing. Bumchums98 (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

My response is the same as what I said above. I hope you aren't blocked if you aren't the same person as the previously blocked account. But the final decision isn't up to me; someone else will have to decide the matter. Please do not post anything else here. SilverLocust 💬 01:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Please Remove SPI Checkuser from my account! It is my earnest request

Hello SilverLocust, why have you demanded an SPI checkuser on my account just because my edits were similar to the suspected sockpuppet Kajal1985srivastav. You can check my IP Address and Kajal1985srivastav's IP address. Both are different IP address and my interest in editing a certain topic can also be similar to the interest of Kajal1985srivastav. Just bacause my edita are similar to Kajal1985srivastav which is a coincidence that does not make me a suspected on confirmed sockpuppet of Kajal1985srivastav. I hope and am earnestly requesting you to please withdraw the SPI checkuser on my account because I am innocent and have not done any disconstructive edits. I hope that I will not be blocked from editing. If this will be done it would be very unfair means to me because I love to edit Wikipedia. Ulises70+- (talk) 01:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

My response is the same as what I said above. I hope you aren't blocked if you aren't the same person as the previously blocked account. But the final decision isn't up to me; someone else will have to decide the matter. Please do not post anything else here. SilverLocust 💬 01:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

These comments were also posted at the SPI page. Both accounts were blocked. SilverLocust 💬 14:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Stony Point quick-fail

Hi @SilverLocust. Just wondering why you failed the Stony Point line article earlier today? You weren't the reviewer and also the reviewer is currently on holiday and therefore can't finish it till he gets back. Just wanted to check your thinking. Thanks. HoHo3143 (talk) 00:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

@HoHo3143: I don't quite know what you mean. What action of mine failed the Stony Point line article? I moved the article (and its subpages) based on a requested-move discussion, but I haven't had anything to do with GA reviews. I see that the "old move" template was put in the wrong section by the move closer script I used (which I will now fix), but that didn't mean the GA has failed. SilverLocust 💬 00:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
@SilverLocust sorry I've realised now. I thought you had just failed it out of nowhere, but now I understand that it occurred when moving the articles and then someone reopened it. Sorry for the mistake! HoHo3143 (talk) 00:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Full collapse

Doesn't collapsing everything in a discussion tend to suggest that the discussion is simply closed? I believe it also disables the quick reply function. Together, the visual precedent and function disabling seem rather likely to deter further participation. I thought your prior solution on the other hand was rather ingenious, if unconventional, as a means of restoring clarity. I don't think you should let a lone complainant deter you in relisting a discussion as you see fit. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

@Iskandar323: I take your point that this prevents the "reply" function, so I have removed the middle one. It was collapsible rather than collapsed. I set them to open by default (though on the mobile site there is not an option to change between collapsed and open). SilverLocust 💬 20:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Proof that however neat a system you attempt to create, well ... Iskandar323 (talk) 04:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Relist Operation Gideon

Could you please explain me what happened in the last 24h with the relist of Operation Gideon? My vote was removed, the sections moved again and WMrapids was reinserted in the bubbles. I cannot highlight further that a close would have been preferable in order to motivate a non-bludgeoned RM. ReyHahn (talk) 14:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

@ReyHahn: My two most recent edits were my final involvement in trying to fix this. I continue to believe my initial reconfiguration would have been fine if it didn't end up with 3-4 people trying to make format changes, but I am aware that you do not agree. So I tried just removing the formatting changes (and my relist), but The ed17 decided to restore them. Your comment seems to have been removed by mistake when he did that; you can put it back. If you cannot highlight your point further, that would suggest you don't need to keep restating it. If another uninvolved editor decides to close it, that's fine with me. SilverLocust 💬 15:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, SilverLocust. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you again, Ingenuity (since you also granted the temporary permissions). SilverLocust 💬 02:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SilverLocust/Archive_1&oldid=1176670285"