User talk:Shellypls

Disclaimer: I receive a stipend from the Open Knowledge Association (OKA), to support the work I do on Wikipedia. However, the contributions are my own. More information on OKA is available here.

Hypotyposis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hypotyposis, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "javascript:(function(){var x,k,f,j;x=document.forms;for (k=0;k<x.length;++k){f=x[k];for(j=0;j<f.length;++j){f[j].disabled=false; f[j].readOnly=false;}}})()" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

As far as I concern I really do not agree with moving the article to the draftspace, it is not justified as there are already more 40 references and around 10 bibliographic sources. Shellypls (talk) 01:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

If you are going to be slapping up 'translated' articles from French-wiki to English-wiki, the least you could do is fix all the citations. The HARVTXT citations you have in the article do not work correctly. Please fix them. Grorp (talk) 02:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Hypotyposis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hypotyposis, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Horses in Cuba is a great article. Well done!! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Unnecessary blocked of IP address from editing Wikipedia

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shellypls (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 38.43.130.189

Decline reason:

Since technically you can edit via other IPs, I have to procedurally decline the request. Lifting a block like this is rather difficult without being really good at network engineering and able to argue about whether it really is configured as a proxy (And, unfortunately, other people's use of VPN/proxies on adjacent IPs can make yours appear to be on it. I'd tell your ISP about this.

All this is not to say there is nothing we—or rather you—can do. The best option is to go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow those instructions to request IP block exemption via email. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

The IP address or range 38.43.130.189 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪ST47ProxyBot‬ for the following reason(s):The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be used by a peer-to-peer proxy service. These services allow users to change their IP address by proxying their browsing traffic through another user's computer. As with any open or anonymizing proxy or VPN service, these IPs may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

However, I have never used any VPN or proxy service, I would like my account to be unblocked in order to go on my work and contribute Wikipedia articles as a translator. If there is any appeal or something that I can do to have my able account again, please, let me know. Thank you! Shellypls (talk) 03:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Horses in Botswana is a beautifully constructed article. Great job!! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Abbatial church of Notre-Dame de Mouzon. User:Pbritti, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thank you for your work! If you don't mind sharing, could you elaborate on whether you received compensation for this specific article?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pbritti}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pbritti (talk) 06:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

@Pbritti: Hi, @Pbritti. Yes, I'm paid by OKA, but I'm free to choose which articles to translate within a given indiscriminate list. Moreover, I'm paid TO TRANSLATE, but not on a specific or given topic. The website is available on my user page and @OKA always try to keep everything transparent. Apart from that, I'm a translator, I'm not a writer or any similar to that, it means I ONLY TRANSLATE existing wiki articles, I don't create any of them from scratch. Shellypls (talk) 15:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Excellent. Removing the COI tag from the church article and wishing you good luck with your work. Let me know if I can help! Thanks. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Horse articles

Hi, I see you are creating several horse breed articles. First off, welcome! But please, we have a longstanding standard for writing these, and you will save us a lot of cleanup if you could do a few things differently. We have guidelines at our horse breeds task force page. A couple main ones: First off, we use the (horse) disambiguator for named individual animals—not breeds. For breeds, we use “horse” or “pony” as part of the title—so I moved Yushu (horse) to Yushu horse. Second, we are careful not to create content forks for strains within existing breeds…for example, I also put a merge tag on Yushu horse to merge it with Tibetan pony—if one is a substrain of the other, then they need to be combined (as we did with Alter Real and Lusitano.) Third, if you do add a new article to the List of horse breeds, please put it in alphabetical order within the proper category—not in the “See also” section (I did this for you with Miquelon horse. Also, we usually put various navboxes, infoboxes and specific categories with each horse breed article; I recommend you look at our featured articles for examples—Andalusian horse is a nice example, or Thoroughbred. I don’t edit WP as much as I used to, but you can post at my talkpage and that will ping me on email. Or, you can seek guidance from Wikiproject Equine if anyone is around there. Users @Ealdgyth: or @Justlettersandnumbers: are also around more than I am and may be of further assistance. I hope this is useful to you, and I encourage your efforts. Montanabw^(talk) 06:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hi Shellypls! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Violence and autism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violence and autism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence and autism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(t · c) buidhe 01:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Lion depictions in art. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Excellent work; reviewed!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx (they/them) ⚧ 12:10, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Strawberry roan (horse color). User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx (they/them) ⚧ 04:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Translating titles

I notice you are creating many horse articles translated from the French Wikipedia. I request that you include English translations of source titles by using the |trans-title= parameter in your citations. Here is one example which I made to illustrate how to use |trans-title=. Thank you. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 01:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

See-also sections

I recommend you read MOS:SEEALSO, specifically "Links in this section should be relevant". I know you are translating horse articles from French Wikipedia, then I notice you going back and adding all your articles to the "See also" sections of the earlier articles. For example, you linked (bi-directionally) two 1800s French trotters to a mid-1900s Russian stallion, and none of the articles had anything in common with each other. This is an inappropriate use of the See also section. Please limit your additions to the See also section to Wikipedia articles that are relevant. Thank you. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 01:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your recommendation, I truly appreciate it. I'll take it into account for my future articles and I'll edit the last ones to improve the "See also" section. Shellypls (talk) 02:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. You might want to look at some of the navigational templates, which help to link together "collections" of articles. For example, Template:Equus (genus) for the "Horses in country X" articles, Template:Horse breeds of France (and many others) for lists of breeds by a particular country. I'm not sure if there are any templates made that compile collections of individual horses or foundation stallions. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 02:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on 20,000 Colombian peso note. User:FuzzyMagma, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

great article, please include the images for the note. You can upload it as non-free work using Wikipedia:File upload wizard. Let me know if you need further help

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Shandan horse

Hello, Shellypls,

Thank you for creating Shandan horse.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating, see if you can link other article to this one, maybe by adding it as a "See also" entry for a related article. Good job

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Templates for named horses

For horse articles, please use Template:Infobox named horse or Template:Infobox racehorse rather than Template:Infobox animal. For horses, you should be using a template which uses the words "sire" and "dam" and "foaled", not "parent" and "child" and "born". Please edit the articles you have created about horses to use the appropriate infobox, including your recent The Norfolk Phœnomenon. Also, you should put each parameter on a separate line and not all bunched together. Thanks.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 21:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your recommendation, I really appreciate it. Shellypls (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

I have never seen infoboxes bunched up before. They are always put one item on a line, like this.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 22:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean by "on a line" since I see both edits (mine and yours) similar. My edit is on a line, as you mention, it is not "bunched up". Shellypls (talk) 22:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

This is almost impossible to read (parameters bunched together):

{{Short description|French trotting race mare}}{{Infobox named horse|horsename=Bayadère|image=Bayadère (1859 - 1972), jument trotteuse.jpg|sire=The Norfolk Phœnomenon|dam=Bayadère|sex=Male|foaled=Roquelaure, Galathée, and Orpheline|birth_place=Tournai-sur-Dive|death_date=1872|color=Bay}}

This is easier to read and understand (one parameter per line):

{{Short description|French trotting race mare}}
{{Infobox named horse
|horsename=Bayadère
|image=Bayadère (1859 - 1972), jument trotteuse.jpg
|sire=The Norfolk Phœnomenon
|dam=Bayadère
|sex=Female
|foaled=Roquelaure, Galathée, and Orpheline
|birth_place=Tournai-sur-Dive
|death_date=1872
|color=Bay
}}

  ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 02:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Uranium mining in France. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Gien viaduct. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Moledo. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Port of Caraquet. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Hôtel du Louvre. Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice page. Some statements need sourcing (marked as citation needed) to reach B-class.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 06:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Elbeuf tramway. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Pier (bridge structure)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Pier (bridge structure)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 09:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Water agency (France). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for bringing this translation to Wikipedia. For future articles in English, note that the 'See also' section is for listing other Wikipedia articles (not the Bibliography); it's also helpful to use the most specific category possible. I considered moving the article to Water agency, but perhaps its best kept where it is for now as there are other European boards that might reasonably have pages here (like the Spanish one). Remember to link it from other pages to integrate it into the project (I've done so from Water board).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Your translations from French

Hi there, Shellypls, and thank you for all your translations from French over the past 12 months. In connection with my interest in OKA, I have been looking through your articles, reviewing and assessing them as necessary. The results look pretty impressive, particularly as by coincidence you have just hit 100 B-rated articles. Keep up the good work. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Equestrianism in Brittany. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Louis-Pantaléon de Noé

The page Louis-Pantaléon de Noé has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, Liz. I must say I am rather baffled by this deletion. I have looked at R2 and cannot understand why it applies to this article. I looked carefully through the article as well as the original French article. It seemed to me as if it was a good, well-sourced translation which deserved mainspace status. As I frequently come across other articles by OKA translators which deserve to be reviewed, moved or assessed, I would welcome further explanations as I do not want to encounter further problems in this connection. You might also be able to explain what further action needs to be taken if this article is to be moved to mainspace. I think Rosiestep might also be interested to hear why the article needed to be deleted as we have both been trying to find solutions to the payment problems encountered by OKA editors (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Intertranswiki). It seems to me that even if they receive payment, the OKA editors generally produce work deserving to be moved to article space but I would of course like to avoid any further moves liable to lead to deletion. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Liz: I see that Draft:Spa Conference (2-3 July 1918) was also deleted from mainspace but has now been recreated as Conférence de Spa (29 septembre 1918). Is this acceptable? (same thing with Draft:Spa Conference (13-15 August 1918). I think we need to see what the real problem is here.--Ipigott (talk) 12:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Château de Magny-en-Bessin has been accepted

Château de Magny-en-Bessin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Shellypls. Thank you for your work on Château de Magny-en-Bessin. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very good article and well illustrated ! Try and avoid WP:SANDWICH on images

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis-Pantaléon de Noé has been accepted

Louis-Pantaléon de Noé, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 21:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collège Henri-IV has been accepted

Collège Henri-IV, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consequences of the Chernobyl disaster in France has been accepted

Consequences of the Chernobyl disaster in France, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for this super-detailed article! I did think some quotations were too long, like this one for example.

Cette carte fait apparaître des dépôts supérieurs, voire très supérieurs aux estimations faites à l’époque, notamment sur toutes les zones de l’Est de la France ayant reçu des précipitations supérieures à 20 mm. Si l’on excepte le premier bilan établi le 7 mai par le SCPRI, mentionnant des dépôts extrêmement faibles et inférjeurs à 1 O00 Bq mP2, la première carte publiée par cet organisme dans son bulletin mensuel de juin 1986 (sorti quelques semaines plus tard), faisait état de dépôts moyens régionaux de ‘37Csallant de 1 O00 à 5 400 Bq m-* dans l’Est de la France (SCPRI, 1986) alors qu’ils ont pu atteindre jusqu’à 40 O00 Bq mp2

"This rain-deposit relationship led to a map of theoretical deposits of caesium 137 and iodine 131 in 1986. This map shows deposits that were higher, or even much higher, than the estimates made at the time, particularly in all areas of eastern France that received rainfall in excess of 20 mm. With the exception of the SCPRI's first report on May 7, which mentioned extremely low deposits of less than 1,000 Bq/m2 , the first map published by this organization in its monthly bulletin of June 1986 (released a few weeks later) indicated average regional deposits of cesium 137 ranging from 1,000 to 5,400 Bq/m2 in eastern France (SCPRI, 1986), whereas they may have been as high as 40,000 Bq/m2."

Long quotations is iffy in terms of copyright. Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Basilica of Saint-Cyprien has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Basilica of Saint-Cyprien. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaulerent barn has been accepted

Vaulerent barn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 07:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georges-Besse plant has been accepted

Georges-Besse plant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 02:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Stanley Wohlmann has been accepted

Arthur Stanley Wohlmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 05:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Arthur Stanley Wohlmann

Hello, Shellypls,

Thank you for creating Arthur Stanley Wohlmann.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The layout of the images and their bolded captions should be redone to align with the MOS (i.e. justify right and avoid bolding). thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 16:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

@Aszx5000:

Hello!

Thank you for your advice, I've reviewed them and addressed them accordingly.

Shellypls (talk) 22:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Nice job! Looks great. Aszx5000 (talk) 23:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fontenay aqueduct has been accepted

Fontenay aqueduct, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata links

Amazing job you are doing importing high quality articles on frwiki to enwiki! If you have the time, is great to make the link with the new imported en article to its Wikidata page (as I have done with Fontenay aqueduct), as it lets us easily see the other language versions. Great job :) Aszx5000 (talk) 11:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost plant has been accepted

Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost plant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 15:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Léopold Fabre has been accepted

Léopold Fabre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 20:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Caves has been accepted

Russell Caves, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 07:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Val d'Or train station has been accepted

Val d'Or train station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polish immigration to the Nord-Pas-de-Calais coalfield has been accepted

Polish immigration to the Nord-Pas-de-Calais coalfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jean Barreteau has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jean Barreteau. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chantenay-sur-Loire has been accepted

Chantenay-sur-Loire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 06:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Basilica of Saint-Cyprien has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Basilica of Saint-Cyprien. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eruption of Kīlauea in 1960 has been accepted

Eruption of Kīlauea in 1960, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 21:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Lille has been accepted

History of Lille, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 13:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hélène Picard has been accepted

Hélène Picard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 20:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constitution of Carthage has been accepted

Constitution of Carthage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Egyptian Arabian (horse) has been accepted

Egyptian Arabian (horse), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 07:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basilica of Saint-Cyprien has been accepted

Basilica of Saint-Cyprien, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 20:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antoine II Coëffier de Ruzé has been accepted

Antoine II Coëffier de Ruzé, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 22:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pile (monument) has been accepted

Pile (monument), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mediterranean cetaceans has been accepted

Mediterranean cetaceans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 23:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Nord-Pas-de-Calais (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of Nord-Pas-de-Calais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Shellypls! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nord-Pas-de-Calais, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matignon Accords. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

@DPL bot Hello! I've already addressed the issue. Thank you for reviewing. Shellypls (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger Claudel has been accepted

Roger Claudel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melvin Gallant has been accepted

Melvin Gallant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 08:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orlov-Rostopchin has been accepted

Orlov-Rostopchin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jdcomix (talk) 17:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerlenn Pondi has been accepted

Kerlenn Pondi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Shenaall (t ♣ c) 02:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Katoaga, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Réghaïa lake has been accepted

Réghaïa lake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jdcomix (talk) 15:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pony riding

The article Pony riding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable original research from French wiki

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

@GrorpThank you for your advice about improving the article. Pony riding has been already merged to an existing article Pony. Shellypls (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Shellypls, inserting verbatim into another article the entire content from an article that was WP:PRODed is not a merge, and is an incorrect method of resolving a proposed deletion.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 21:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Étienne Beudant has been accepted

Étienne Beudant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Réghaïa forest has been accepted

Réghaïa forest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:08, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Religion in Nord-Pas-de-Calais (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Religion in Nord-Pas-de-Calais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 01:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Barreteau has been accepted

Jean Barreteau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 16:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Communauté de Communes du Pays de Lure has been accepted

Communauté de Communes du Pays de Lure, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CitrusHemlock 16:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)