User talk:Sephiroth BCR/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sephiroth BCR. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Images
You know all of those Naruto images I uploaded, they are all orphaned. What am I to do with the pictures if I can't put theme on any of the Naruto articles? Lee5435 01:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Itachi
Why didn't you tell me it was merged I just found out 2 minutes ago after being online for 2 hours. I fixed a redirect that still linked to teh article. Cheers! ^_^ Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 03:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- With regards to the merge, does the databook mention anything about Itachi's background information/abilities? If so, does it count as a reliable third-party source? σмgнgσмg 07:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, explain to me exactly why you merged Itachi Uchiha into the other thingy, severely cutting the character in half??? You are as bad to Naruto as if the authour were to die. ItachiUchihaArticleForTheWin 00:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Wow
- (cur) (last) 00:31, September 4, 2007 Tjstrf (Talk | contribs) m (14,055 bytes) (putting back explanatory prod tag.) (undo)
- (cur) (last) 00:31, September 4, 2007 Sephiroth BCR (Talk | contribs) (14,053 bytes) (Undid revision 155582438 by Sephiroth BCR (talk) fair enough) (undo)
- (cur) (last) 00:31, September 4, 2007 Tjstrf (Talk | contribs) (13,591 bytes) (To justify last edit, the prod explains the situation in more detail than the db- tag does, so it increases the chance of the deletion going through.) (undo)
- (cur) (last) 00:31, September 4, 2007 Sephiroth BCR (Talk | contribs) (13,593 bytes) (I was about to correct that, but there's no reason for the prod to be there with the CSD tag there right?) (undo)
Four redundant edits to the same article in the same minute with no edit conflicts. Amazing. --tjstrf talk 07:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
As the reviewing admin, this is not the way to do it. It lists the page in multiple places and confuses everyone dealing with it. But the suggestion to use a prod was right: actually, a prod is the only correct tag, for a hoax article cannot be deleted via speedy. Please read WP:CSD, where it says so very clearly--the reason is that what one person thinks an obvious hoax, about 5% of the time turns out not to be when others have had a chance to see it. And Speedy for non-notability does not apply to fiction--for a similar reason, what one person thinks totally unimportant another may recognize. So I've left the prod. The thing to do now is to follow up to make sure it isn't removed. There's at least one anonymous editor who is actually still working on the article! If it is removed, the thing to do is to send it to AfD, not replace the prod(for it will undoubtedly just be removed again). Good catch, by the way. DGG (talk) 16:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- simpler to let the Hellsing Death Nether prod run. It will go soon enough. But I will warn the author. DGG (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Jirachi
I see no one saying "Jirachi should be merged" can you show me where that is said as I don't believe someone has. If I don't get a reply soon I will revert your merge. Henchman 2000 18:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I have taken your comments seriously and have implemented them (or are in the process of implementing.) I have requested a withdrawal of the nomination while I work on the page. Please feel free to leave additional comments on the talk page while I work to bring the list to FL sniff. Thanks. ludahai 魯大海 13:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced message
(Shaneymike accidentally made this into an article instead of leaving it on your talk page. I've deleted the article, and copied the text here. DS 15:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC))
"I agree that this article does need a lot of work. I've made a few edits myself. However, this character is pretty important considering his final confrontation with Kamille Bidan, which is why I would not delete or redirect it. Please note that I've added a reference section to it. Shaneymike 14:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)"
Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 05:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Redirecting Itachi Uchiha
I really don't agree with what you did. It is not that "I like the page" or anything, but I see the suggestions on whether Itachi should be redirected or not aren't over. Merging the article before consensus is set is a bad idea, and WP:FICT isn't a policy but a mere notability guideline. Please wait until this matter is settled, pending on the conclusion, people continued to comment even after this redirect was made and I find it very confusing that it was merged before a compromise. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Of course I have a reason, WP:FICT#Notable topics. In almost every major scene in the manga Itachi appears, whether it be in battle or for showing up. The section you want it to redirect to is nothing more than a sum-up, and I don't see it as "just another WP:PLOT summary", being that the article itself has several references, including the name origin and profile. Can we just agree on something in the talk page before the article is redirected like that? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, is there a limit to how long a section has to be before it can become an article? I'm assuming we could add the additional refs, as well as the image, to the redirected location. But I'd like an answer to my first question, if you may, then a response to the latter. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps an antagonist like Orochimaru merits a page? My earlier question was that there shouldn't be a problem if I added Image:Itachi uchiha.jpg to its proper section, as well as the name ref. Correct? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, is there a limit to how long a section has to be before it can become an article? I'm assuming we could add the additional refs, as well as the image, to the redirected location. But I'd like an answer to my first question, if you may, then a response to the latter. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk pages
Please see my comments on User talk:Snapper2. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 18:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I've nominated it for merge. Since no one seems to ever look at it, I thought it would be better to tell you such directly. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 22:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I want to get blocked
Just block my account already!--Mhart54com 05:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- just block it, but then if i do anything else how long will i get blocked for?--Mhart54com 05:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 37 | 10 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:NarutoDVDUncut1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NarutoDVDUncut1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Bleach images
It would be nice if you would put all the various images you've been uploading into Category:Bleach images (or its subcats) for maintenance purposes. --tjstrf talk 00:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- The movie is still an anime, so yeah. I'll do it though. --tjstrf talk 03:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
The comment left on my page about citing a specific video on Naruto: Clash of Ninja
Just wanted to let ya know I just copied the same way characters were cited through game images (the page, not the specific image showing the character itself). And if it's wrong, why don't you change it? I have no problem with that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaRk StRiDeR (talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: Pictures
Thanks for the heads up. =) σмgнgσмg 06:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 38 | 17 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
naruto
How dop u visit the old articles that for stupid reasons were deleted how do i view the old ones do u know —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blanknothingoknaruto (talk • contribs)
A little to firm.
I notice that some of your answers on the naruto talk pages have been a little mean, by this i mean that you should be a little less firm and a little bit nicer. -Tobi4242 00:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Akatsuki talk page. Tobi\Obito section at bottom. -Tobi4242 00:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
sound like a bot
Dude, you sound like a bot, with words like endevor and converse. Loosen up man! responed on this page. 71.76.237.158 23:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Your last edit(s) on Naruto: Clash of Ninja
I think you were trying to help the article, but in doing so you replaced "This installment introduces the ability to have four players playing at any given time" with "This installment allows a player to choose two characters to form a team, which can then be pitted against other two-man teams." The second statement is slightly correct, but the first statement was MORE accurate as with 4 players you can fight free for all, 3 vs 1, or 2 vs 2, not JUST 2 on 2.. Please correct this. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaRk StRiDeR (talk • contribs) 11:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
List of Naruto episodes (Seasons 1-2)
Heh, you'd be surprised how long that missing "the" went without notice; after seeing your comment in my watchlist, I went back and checked the earliest revision of the page, from right after it was exported from my sandbox: [1]. I have no clue if a "the" was added in at any point since then and then removed, but it appears that English's favorite three-letter word was absent from that sentence through 104 revisions! :) You Can't See Me! 02:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Congrats
|
The Manga and Anime BarnSakura Award | |
| For almost single-handedly making List of Naruto episodes (Seasons 1-2) a featured list, congratulations! — Sandtiger 14:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC) |
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HammerArt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HammerArt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 40 | 1 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Thank you for telling me, but I was already aware that you cleaned up, expanded, and pretty much made the article what it is now; all I did was create it and add in some general summaries last December. Great job by the way; looks really well done.--十八 05:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
not a violation
"dont come and bug me about my edits" i changed it like you said then you came and warned me 5 minutes later--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- It it rude now?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 10:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Can you talk with other fan of Naruto anime and manga on changing all of the Akatsuki members aricles back to normal
Dear Sephiroth BCR,
Can u talk with the other fans of the Naruto anime and manga about changing all Akatsuki members info back to being accessible in a main article, with plot overviews, abilities, history, motives, personalty etc, etc.
from NoMercyMurderer —Preceding unsigned comment added by NoMercyMurderer (talk • contribs) 02:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to get back to you so late, somehow I missed the message. I would be glad to sort the issue out, but I am going to again be away for a day, and I am leaving in only a few moments. I urge you tom perhaps ask another admin. Sorry, and best regards, -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Sephiroth BCR! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 00:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
What of it? Zerocannon 05:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- What say you both put an end to this dispute? Dreadstar † 06:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your willingness to end the dispute. Much appreciated.. I've responded to the situation here. Please let me know if this starts up again, rather than edit warring or attacking each other. Hopefully this puts an end to it. Dreadstar † 07:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your great response, I've responded to your response...;) Hopefully Zerocannon will follow suit, I'm sure he will. Dreadstar † 07:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your willingness to end the dispute. Much appreciated.. I've responded to the situation here. Please let me know if this starts up again, rather than edit warring or attacking each other. Hopefully this puts an end to it. Dreadstar † 07:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)