User talk:Numspan33

March 2024

Hello, I'm Aviram7. I noticed that in this edit to 100,000, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i removed the 9,999th prime number Semen2 (talk) 13:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nothing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Paradoctor (talk) 17:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Semen2! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of prime numbers several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:List of prime numbers, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. JBL (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 10,000,000, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Most of your edits get reverted. You're new, I get it. But you need to engage with what other, more experienced, editors are telling you. Above all, provide edit summaries. Nobody owes you guessing what you may have intended. Just as important: If someone reverts an edit of yours, do not simply re-revert. That's edit warring. Address the issue raised in the revert's edit summary instead. If you don't understand it, ask! Paradoctor (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Semen2. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Semen2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Semen2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 04:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spy number moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Spy number. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Semen2", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it contains inappropriate wording. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

There are many factors which moderators consider for banning a wikipedia account. Your account will be banned if you don't stop vandalising wikipedia pages.If you've any queries teahouse. Click here to know my name (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change of someone else's user page.

In most cases it is frowned upon to change someone else's user page without their consent. Please refrain from doing so. You may however add a section to their user talk page, if it is relevant. Dhrm77 (talk) 17:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citing OEIS

When citing OEIS, do not use the search result as the page title, instead please use <ref>{{cite OEIS|Axxxxxx|title}}</ref> where Axxxxxx is the sequence number and title is its title. If the title includes an '=' sign, precede it with "2=".

If you add multiple number with the same citation, use <ref name=XXX>{{cite OEIS|Axxxxxx|title}}</ref> for the first, and <ref name=XXX/> for any subsequent entry, where XXX could be anything, but should be the sequence number to be useful.

Also, the retrieve date is mostly irrelevant for OEIS, since it's unlikely to change. Thanks Dhrm77 (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why are you using Axxxxxx as the sequence number Semen2 (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Axxxxxx "IS" the sequence number! I'm not sure to understand your question. I'm sure you already know that Axxxxxx only represent a sequence suce as A000040, for instance. But, did you mean to ask why I also use is as the reference name? Dhrm77 (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stay off people's user pages

You have been warned by Dhrm77 of this four days ago. Now you did it to me. You have got enough to do learning the ropes as it is. You are not qualified to interfere with other user's user pages. Ask first, on their user talk pages. And listen to what they say.

While we're at it: WP:EDITSUMMARY: According to the consensus policy, all edits should be explained [...] —either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. This is important for you, because you're making a lot mistakes, and other editors need to know what you intended to do so they can react properly. Paradoctor (talk) 20:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Dhrm77 and Paradoctor.

This also means, Jimbo Wales' user page needs to be protected, because there are so many edits from other users! 2A00:6020:A123:8B00:992C:4DCB:8C46:A7E3 (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) Jimbo's user page is semi protected and move protected. For information on protection levels, see Wikipedia:Protection policy.

2) The current protection state is the result of a discussion in March 2021. If you want to know why there is no stronger protection, read the discussion, that should prove informative. Paradoctor (talk) 21:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is semi protected, as it shows a "view source" button, but the previous reply is about the user page, which shows an "edit" button, as its newest protection log entry only shows "Move=Require administrator access", which does not affect normal edits. 2A00:6020:A123:8B00:8D5:C34:869:BE16 (talk) 07:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the exchange at the end of the protection discussion. Or, just try to publish an edit while logged out. Semiprotection is the default for user pages, and does not need to be set explicitly. And yes, that could be handled better. If you have the energy, ask at WP:VP/T or something, maybe it gets done. Paradoctor (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UPPROT: Base user pages (for example, the page User:Example, and not User:Example/subpage or User talk:Example) are automatically protected from creation or editing by unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP users [...] This protection is enforced by an edit filter. Paradoctor (talk) 16:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it is not Semen2 (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🤷 Paradoctor (talk) 21:16, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo's user page

Please stop adding {{pp|small=yes}} to Jimbo's user page. It's currently not protected, and adding that doesn't protect it. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jauerback PP small=yes would imply that the user is saying that Jimbo's... figure it out yourself. It's clearly vandalistic. Waylon (was) (here) 18:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're dead wrong. Read the template's documentation, and you will see that this an entirely correct use of the template}}.

Oh, and Jauerback is wrong, see WP:UPROT for an explanation. Which is kinda ironic, given the he is an edit filter manager. Paradoctor (talk) 18:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dushu (town)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dushu (town), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. M66JX (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William McKnight (entrepreneur) (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The career section is overly promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William McKnight (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Semen2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Internationale der Kriegsdienstgegner/innen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Internationale der Kriegsdienstgegner/innen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Waylon (was) (here) 17:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Semen2, does not comply with Wikipedia's username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy, which is summarized here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed, unblocked, courtesy ping to 331dot - Cabayi (talk) 07:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bowers's operators moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bowers's operators. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and as with the last time it was deleted, there is no evidence of notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bowers's operators (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bowers's operators and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 15:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faxul (number) (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faxul (number) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Copy notation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Copy notation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't invent it.(User:JrandWP/Twenty-twos) Numspan33 (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page you linked was also created by you and declined because it doesn't meet WP:GNG. If you didn't invent it, cite some sources. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twenty-twos (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JrandWP/Twenty-twos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy notation moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Copy notation. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Whpq (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Symphony No. 104 (Haydn), without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your move was improper because the request had been contested and thus requires discussion. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyperfactorial array notation (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hyperfactorial array notation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Giggol

The article Giggol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks all notability, most sources don't even contain "Giggol", no reliable sources seem to give significant attention to this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hyper-E notation

The article Hyper-E notation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this has received significant attention from reliable independent sources, i.e. that this is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Username5243's Array Notation

The article Username5243's Array Notation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage in reliable sources. Sourced only to primary and unreliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 16:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable mathematical notations

Please read and understand Wikipedia's guidelines for topics which should have articles (Wikipedia:Notability). You recent creation of these articles have been moved to draft, or proposed for deletion. None of them establish notability as they are sourced to unreliable sources; most of them being google sites pages. -- Whpq (talk) 17:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheep language (April 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Qcne (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies @Numspan33. I mistakenly assumed your draft was vandalism due to the use of recurrent traditionally vulgar language throughout the draft. I have undone my Rejection, but have declined it based on the fact we have an article at Yan_tan_tethera which you are welcome to improve.

My apologies again for my misunderstanding. Qcne (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheep language (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Yan_tan_tethera instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sheep language and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cite OEIS

on 13 April 2024, in this edit : https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=6000_(number)&oldid=1218742069 you created a lot of cite problems. When citing OEIS, do not use the search result as the page title, instead please use ^[1] where Axxxxxx is the sequence number and title is its title. If the title includes an '=' sign, precede it with "2=".

If you add multiple number with the same citation, use ^[2] for the first, and ^[2] for any subsequent entry, where XXX could be anything, but should be the sequence number to be useful. That naming makes it easier to move similar references from one page to another. After you make a change, make sure you hit "show preview" and check that there is no cite errors.

Thanks Dhrm77 (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For more info on citing, please see HELP:CITE. Paradoctor (talk) 13:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence Axxxxxx (title)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation.
^ ^a ^b Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence Axxxxxx (title)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Ordinal markup

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ordinal markup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

Hi Numspan33,

I've noticed that you have had many articles deleted for various reasons, usually due to not meeting Wikipedia:Notability. May I please suggest you take a break from creating articles for now? Persistent creation of deleted articles is something that people have been blocked from editing for before, so I think you should try to address this before it approaches that point.

Here's some helpful reading in the meantime.

Few things on Fandom are notable enough to be posted on Wikipedia. As a general rule of thumb, if anyone could've come up with the source content, that source isn't reliable enough to be used here. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only the ordinal markup article was deleted Numspan33 (talk) 08:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy notation was also deleted. You also have three pending PROD's and multiple declined drafts. Basically the same thing.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you disregarded User:Whpq's request to do the same above. Listening is essential here.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spy number (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spy number and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HyperOS (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

feels that no new sourcing was added since the last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HyperOS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 10:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

You've continued creating drafts about clearly non-notable things after my earlier message, so I'm going to ask more directly now: stop. Please work on editing and improving existing articles until you gain a much better grasp of what notability is and what passes for reliable sourcing, covered in the links above. If you continue creating too many unsuitable drafts or pages, you will most likely be blocked from further editing. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Penta (river) moved to draftspace

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Penta (river), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Penta (river) where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. You need to fix the many broken links, formatting issues, etc. with this article before it is published – as it stands it is barely readable. Wham2001 (talk) 20:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continual creation of non-notable pages and drafts by Numspan33. Thank you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Numspan33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account is not a sockpuppet Numspan33 (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Funny thing is that every sockpuppet says they aren't one, since that is the whole point. If that were sufficient to be unblocked, the sockpuppetry policy would be meaningless. You'll have to do better than this and provide a plausible explanation as to why you might appear to be connected to these accounts if you actually aren't. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 14:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

why do i appear to be connected to these accounts Numspan33 (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Either you're connected to the other accounts(Editer344, Googologist999), or you aren't. You may make a new request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Numspan33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

provide a reason why I appear connected to these accounts.

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Nots16 at the very least. And this isn't really an unblock request. WP:GAB explains how to properly contest your block. Yamla (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Numspan33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I created Nots16 when i was blocked because my username did not meet the username policy Numspan33 (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stop creating new accounts and request an unblock on your first account. This sock puppet account won't be unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

BLAR notice

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Internationale der Kriegsdienstgegner/innen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to War Resisters' International. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lunar calendar (Ancient Egypt)

Hello, Numspan33. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lunar calendar (Ancient Egypt), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spy number

Hello, Numspan33. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spy number, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lunar calendar (Ancient Egypt)

Hello, Numspan33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lunar calendar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence Axxxxxx (title)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation.

[XXX-2] Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence Axxxxxx (title)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation.

[1]

[2]