User talk:RomanceLove88

Welcome

Hello, RomanceLove88, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is RomanceLove88's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RomanceLove88/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:RomanceLove88/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RomanceLove88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Haunted House (TV series) (January 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RomanceLove88/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:RomanceLove88/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your article creations

Hello there. I don’t mean to be rude, but the last few articles you’ve created were not even close to being ready to be published on Wikipedia. I moved them (back) to the draft space before someone nominated them for deletion. Please take the time to learn more about article writing if you’re going to be attempting to write entire articles from scratch like this. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 17:45, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft article needs significant coverage of independent, reliable sources for verification

RomanceLove88, Greetings. Pls note that if your article was moved to draft space, such as Draft:The Haunted House (TV series), it meant the article is not ready in Wikipedia main space due to sourcing issues, thus do not re-create or move the article in mainspace. Do note that content of the draft article needs to be supported by significant coverage of independent, reliable sources, such as from newspapers, for verification to adhere to Wikipedia notability guidelines. Pls read WP:BURDEN and WP:42. Once you have added the required sources then click the submit button for review. thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move pages without discussion

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. oknazevad (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i didn’t know that because i was using the redirect from channels or companies RomanceLove88 (talk) 14:14, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"TMNT Nickelodeon" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TMNT Nickelodeon. Since you had some involvement with the TMNT Nickelodeon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. oknazevad (talk) 18:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Element Hunters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:RomanceLove88/sandbox

Hello, RomanceLove88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:RomanceLove88/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Haunted House: The Secret of the Cave

Hello, RomanceLove88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Haunted House: The Secret of the Cave".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Haunted House (TV series)

Hello, RomanceLove88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Haunted House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not add machine translations of foreign language articles to Wikipedia. Due to their poor quality, they are generally not useful and can be very difficult to fix. In the future, please follow the instructions laid out at Wikipedia:Translation.Nate • (chatter) 01:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

STOP!

Stop moving pages - just create a redirect! This is highly disruptive. YODADICAE👽 16:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC) I am so sorry because i was just begging edited on this site.[reply]

About List of programs broadcast by Aniplus Asia

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of programs broadcast by Aniplus Asia a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into List of programs broadcast by Aniplus. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Link20XX (talk) 16:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English air date removal

Thanks so much for that, I spent all night the previous night trying to edit things up for the article splits but before I knew it was 4 a.m. and I didn't get everything I wanted to do done.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 06:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55 Your welcome.--RomanceLove88 (talk) 07:23, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Boruto: Naruto Next Generations into List of Boruto: Naruto Next Generations chapters. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of anime broadcast by AT-X for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of anime broadcast by AT-X is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of anime broadcast by AT-X until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Govvy (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2017 in South Korean television moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2017 in South Korean television, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2018 in South Korean television moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2018 in South Korean television, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2016 in South Korean television has been accepted

2016 in South Korean television, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Antan O 02:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 in South Korean television moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 in South Korean television, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Qwerfjkl talk 20:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Haru

The article Kim Haru has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haru Kim moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Haru Kim, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 11:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then deleted my article please, because its impossible to finds more references i tried but thank you. RomanceLove88 (talk) 11:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And what are you talking about i already added citation its correct. RomanceLove88 (talk) 11:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of in South Korean television

A tag has been placed on List of in South Korean television requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Getcha (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Getcha (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Getcha (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just deleted if you want. RomanceLove88 (talk) 02:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Television series set in 2029

A tag has been placed on Television series set in 2029 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Seems like a misplacement of Category:Television series set in 2029

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Mainframe98 _talk 16:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if you would take mistakes like this for deletion when they occur. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series set in 2029

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in 2029 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 07:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Haru (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

additonal reliable sources needed

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kim Haru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kim Haru, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Video games set in the 2089

A tag has been placed on Category:Video games set in the 2089 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television series set in 2089 has been nominated for merging

Category:Television series set in 2089 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:45, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series set in 2089

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in 2089 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Please don't simply ignore consensus like this. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video games set in 2089 has been nominated for discussion

Category:Video games set in 2089 has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Mysterious Apartment" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mysterious Apartment and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 5#Mysterious Apartment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of High School (2012 TV series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on High School (2012 TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gpkp [u • t • c] 09:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021 in South Korean television

Hello, RomanceLove88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 in South Korean television, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured articles

Please stop moving featured article designations between articles. This is a process that requires reviews and it's disruptive to manipulate them like this. -- ferret (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects nominated for deletion

Hello, this is a notice that many of your redirects have been nominated at RfD. Please see the discussions here, here, and here. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RomanceLove88, I really think you should hold off on creating any more MCU redirects, you're giving me a big headache. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it was already redirected i wish i didn't do create name Fantastic Four 1, Fantastic Four 2 and Fantastic Four 3, please and look. RomanceLove88 (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic Four 1 and 2 are fine. Fantastic Four 3 has the same issue as Spider-Man 5/6/7/8/9, so Gonnym might want to add that to their nomination. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, sorry for creating redirected disappointing name about Marvel Cinematic Universe, because it reminds me of parts film timeline in real life of the series, and also finally, you noticing removed Spider-Man redirects, but thank god you notice me on my Talk page. RomanceLove88 (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And The First Avenger, 2 and 3, some other countries used this title, but i read on IMDb in release date and title. RomanceLove88 (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it reminds me of parts film timeline in real life of the series – that is WP:OR, which is prohibited on Wikipedia.

but i read on IMDb in release date and title – IMDb is not a reliable source.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have forgot to remove Homecoming 1 (I created), Homecoming 2 is Far From Home, and Homecoming 3 is No Way Home. And why would you delete Homecoming 4? RomanceLove88 (talk) 05:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Homecoming 1, 2, and 3 are fine, I think. As for Homecoming 4, from Tom Holland: I think if we were lucky enough to dive into these characters again, you'd be seeing a very different version. It would no longer be the Homecoming trilogy. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Spider-Man 9" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spider-Man 9 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Spider-Man 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 05:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already added Spider-Man 4 in The Amazing Spider-Man film. RomanceLove88 (talk) 16:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or not thanks oops. RomanceLove88 (talk) 16:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI an anon had changed the redirect on Norman osbourne Cheers Adakiko (talk) 02:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mii Redirects

May I ask why you are seemingly making redirects for every single Nintendo-Created Mii? It seems extremely excessive and unnecessary, as it is highly unlikely that anyone is going to actively attempt to look them up by typing in "Name(Nintendo)". Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 06:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because Mii is no longer in Nintendo Switch Sports. RomanceLove88 (talk) 06:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just i wanted to created all Mii CPU characters. RomanceLove88 (talk) 06:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mii CPU does exists do you remember this characters? RomanceLove88 (talk) 06:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or redirect to Wii (video game series) need? RomanceLove88 (talk) 07:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please stop, the vast majority of redirects you've created have close to zero utility and is considered disruptive. Please use WP:AFC/R for future redirects, or we will have to take this to WP:ANI. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 07:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating redirects for a while

Hi, RomanceLove88. I'm glad to see you've been making lots of contributions to Wikipedia lately. I appreciate that you've been making a lot of redirects; I work with redirects a lot, and I know that they're vital to making sure that our readers find the content they're looking for.

However, I've noticed that you're creating a lot of redirects that may not be in line with our policy on redirects. Redirects are generally expected to either be plausible alternate names for the page they refer to (not a name you came up with, or that you maybe heard once, but names that people actually use in practice), or terms that are mentioned in the article, or plausible alternate names for those terms. From recent developments at RfD and in the section above, I'm getting the impression that some of your redirects don't comply with that. At Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22, 130 of your redirects have been nominated for deletion. Of those 130, it looks like at most five are going to be kept. Having 125 redirects deleted is a pretty big deal. You shouldn't feel bad about it, but it should tell you that maybe your understanding of redirects isn't quite in line with the community's.

Like Padgriffin said above, there is a page, Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories (AfC/R), where users can go to request the creation of redirects. I would really strongly encourage you to stop creating redirects for a while (at least a month) and use AfC/R instead. Through using that process, you can learn which kinds of redirects other editors are willing to make for you. I think that would be a much better, much more constructive way to move past this issue than any of the other options available.

Again, RomanceLove, I appreciate the energy and enthusiasm you're bringing to Wikipedia, and just want to make sure you're targeting that energy in a constructive way. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RomanceLove, it concerns me that you're continuing to create redirects at this very moment, including several I will have to take to RfD like Peter Parker (2002 film) and Peter Parker (2012 film). I can't compel you to reply to me, and can't compel you to do what I asked, but communication is required here, and if you're going to continue creating these redirects without even replying to say "no thank you", I'm afraid I will have to seek the opinion of administrators. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 08:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its a Sam Raimi 2002 film and Webb Marc 2012 film. RomanceLove88 (talk) 08:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RomanceLove, it's not just about those two redirects. I'm happy to explain why they're problematic, but I didn't write all of that above just to complain about two redirects. Do you understand what I'm saying, my general concerns about the redirects you create? Do you understand that it is a problem that you created 130 redirects that other Wikipedians want to delete? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 08:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yep. RomanceLove88 (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RomanceLove88, I implore you to stop creating any more redirects, Marvel-related or not. I see another editor has raised concerns about your Nintendo-related redirects above. Like I said earlier, you're giving us editors a headache to have to constantly monitor your redirect creations and then clean up after your mess. If you continue this behavior, we will have take it to WP:ANI. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know InfiniteNexus sorry and I will never doing that again i promise. RomanceLove88 (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nuked

RomanceLove88, I have taken the extraordinary step of nuking your redirects. Nuke is a tool that allows administrators to delete all recent creations by a given user. I have done this given the sheer volume of bad redirects you have created and the incredible time wasted in discussing your redirects. As suggested above, if you want to ensure that a redirect is cromulent, please suggest its creation at WP:AFC/R. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Tavix. RomanceLove88, I hope you take this as a lesson learned and avoid creating any more problematic redirects in the future. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. RomanceLove88 (talk) 07:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So i did recreating redirect in my history, please do not delete redirects because is the official when i found on internet, i will never doing that again i promise, i was not recreating redirects to MCU and Mii, I am begging you. RomanceLove88 (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Amazing (2012 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Amazing (2012 film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 26#Amazing (2012 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Amazing (2014 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Amazing (2014 film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 26#Amazing (2014 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 08:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persisting in creating non-useful redirects despite multiple editors asking you to do so, and a dicussion at WP:ANI..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would like to add that moving on from creating redirects to moving perfectly fine titles such as Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2003 TV series) to a made up title TMNT 4Kids isn't better. Gonnym (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I moved that back as well. Black Kite (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite: Talk:TMNT 4Kids also needs to be moved back to Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2003 TV series). InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kim Haru

Hello, RomanceLove88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kim Haru, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User dislikes Wikipedia

Template:User dislikes Wikipedia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User dislikes Wikipedia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User dislikes Wikipedia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 11:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kim Haru

Hello, RomanceLove88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kim Haru".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]