User talk:Rfl0216/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rfl0216. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Rfl0216. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cinema in Sudan: Conversations with Gadalla Gubara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Lewis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
misc.
Hi, Rfl0216, Are you a new user? If not, do you know any useful Babel templates? I want to know a few more. BulbAtop (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Move request
A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
I saw you rated this article "Start" class. According to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Quality scale that means it is "an article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources. Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more." See WP:ARTASS: it would be helpful if you add notes on the article's talk page (not here) saying what improvements you feel would be needed to bring the article up to "C" class on the quality scale. For example, what other information would most users be looking for? What improvements to sourcing, grammar, organization etc. do you feel are most urgently needed? Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hello. I only rated it as a Start class because I did not know whether to rate it "C" or "B" class, but I knew it was above a Stub. You can always re-rate it, if you'd like. Rfl0216 (talk) 15:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- I would never rate an article I started. If you are not sure about the criteria, you can always leave the rating blank. It is still useful to add the project templates. With luck a project member who is familiar with the criteria will spot it and rate it. Looking at the definition of "Start" class, I find the rating a bit discouraging: it sounds like "not much use to anyone". The article is fully sourced, follows all the rules, and that is all I could find on the subject. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- My apologies, I did not realize you were the author of the article. I've removed the ratings, hopefully someone else with better knowledge of C and B class will rate it. Sorry to step on toes. Rfl0216 (talk) 16:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- I would never rate an article I started. If you are not sure about the criteria, you can always leave the rating blank. It is still useful to add the project templates. With luck a project member who is familiar with the criteria will spot it and rate it. Looking at the definition of "Start" class, I find the rating a bit discouraging: it sounds like "not much use to anyone". The article is fully sourced, follows all the rules, and that is all I could find on the subject. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for your helpful contributions on Wikipedia! On reply of your this edit, I want to say that you probably undid my last edit saying "Add parameter", where I had given an edit summary. The {{:Template:Infobox Band}} is already a redirect of {{:Template:Infobox musical artist|background=group_or_band}}. So what you added remains invisible. Undoing your good faith edit, Thanks! M. Billoo 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- No problem, but it still shows up in this category for some reason. Rfl0216 (talk) 00:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Rfl0216. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Leighton Meester
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Leighton Meester has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Rfl0216 (talk) 22:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi
Hello, I would like to ask your help, the page "Draft:Israel lucas gois monteiro" is already some time stopped, I would like to ask your help to move the page and leave it available here in Wikipedia, the article is very well edited, could you help me? Brbolt2 (talk) 05:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. I took a look at the draft and I’m not going to move a page that has been declined by AfC. Sorry. Rfl0216 (talk) 13:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Barnstar
|
The Citation Barnstar | |
| For bringing many of the older references already in The Devil Wears Prada "up to code" as it were Daniel Case (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC) |
Personally, I should add that you saved me some work on the hoped-for ultimate journey to FA for that article by doing this. Although ... I generally use {{cite news}} for things like movie reviews and articles in periodicals or on equivalent websites ({{cite web}}, I think, is better for static web content). And I've noticed more people using the {{nbsp}} template instead of the coding ... I don't know; is that what Provelt does by default? Daniel Case (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Linda Kent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia administrator
Are you a Wikipedia administrator Ziggy 2milli (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natural Rebel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi, Rfl0216, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.
However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.
For a translation of the above message, please click the link below that matches your primary language.
ترجمة 
|
թարգմանություն 
|
tərcümə 
|
пераклад 
|
অনুবাদ 
|
превод 
|
翻译 
|
თარგმანი 
|
μετάφραση 
|
અનુવાદ 
|
תרגום 
|
अनुवाद |
翻訳 
|
ಅನುವಾದ |
번역 
|
ການແປພາສາ
|
превод 
|
भाषांतर करणे |
ترجمه 
|
перевод 
|
превод 
|
மொழிபெயர்ப்பு 
|
అనువాద |ترجمہ 
การแปล 
|
переклад 
|
dịch 
|
איבערזעצונג
Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. A17NAN 15:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Vandalism on FIITJEE article
Please ensure that vandalism (mostly advertising in nature ) do not take place. Skymhnty (talk) 05:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Rfl0216. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
can you search on google for "Dhruv Rathee" and give me your opinion
I was trying to create this article but some editors says he is not a notable person. Hope you will help. Iamskylord (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Simple Life (Elton John song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 04:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. I was trying to get rid of the module string error on the page. I looked at The One (Elton John album) and found the date there. Apologies for not tracking down a reference for it. Rfl0216 (talk) 12:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
Why did you remove episode 12 "Memoribilia" from The Flash? Netflix shows the upcoming episode with that name (Seen on Netflix Canada logged in) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.116.10.180 (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hello. I have access to the US version of Netflix and since The Flash airs on the CW in the United States, I can only access up to season 4. I think I've very rarely seen Netflix as a source for future episode data for a tv show, other than their 100% original stuff like Stranger Things. Since the press release for episode 12 hasn't been released yet, I found it kind of suspect. Rfl0216 (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
My articles
I greatly appreciate you taking the time to rate so many of the articles I've been doing these last 3-4 months. I wonder if you wouldn't mind having a look, at some point, at a few of the ones rated "Start"; I'm sure most of them are justifiably 'start' but it would be nice to have another rater's opinion who seems to appreciate the work I've been putting into this. Also, you could see if you agree with my assessment of my first article, You Are Here, that it is now "B" rather than C. Once again, thank you. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 04:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Odd Øyen Assessment article: C class Assessment
I have noticed you have tried to assess the above article as "C class". Unfortunately, you failed to complete the B-Class 5-criteria checklist to in for it to become "C class". This B-Class 5-criteria checklist also needs to be completed for it to become "Start class", "C class" or "B class". Adamdaley (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tank on the Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Peter and the Wolf article
Can I ask why you rated the Peter and the Wolf (TV special) article as Start-class? (I asked someone before about its quality and told me its close to B) Just want so as a means of feedback! :) NickBlamp (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
I removed your template on the cast section in order to more easily make some edits. I thought I knew how to restore it. Unfortunately I don't. My apologies. I hope you're able to restore it. It was great. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
How is importance determined?
I was wondering, as per this edit on Girl on the Third Floor, how importance is determined? Is there a set criteria, or is it just a judgment call? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Entity
Thanks for the reassessment. I've often thought some of the Start-class assessments my early articles received was too low. What I'd like to know though, is why you removed the |3 from the Reflist? All it does is render the refs ito 3 columns rather than 2, which is useful with bigger ref's. I've seen it used in many other articles. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Strange edits to Infoboxes
Is there a reason you are making edits like this? There's no purpose to having empty lines within a template included like Venue. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 12:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
For exquisite attention to detail, I salute you
|
Cathedral Builder |
| They say God is in the details. Your attention to the finest points of our great construction has not gone unnoticed. Erasmus Sydney (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC) |
Storefront Hitchcock
Thanks for your attention to the Storefront Hitchcock page! Do you have any suggestions for improving it to the next level as far as rating? For example, which of these do you see as the most immediate issue holding it back:
- Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
BrightVamp (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
GBCT
Hi,
Can you offer guidance on how to adopt a more encyclopaedic tone to the GBCT (Guild of British Camera Technicians) page.
Many thanks HMCLSPLYL2020 (talk) 16:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:FL The Wire articles
A tag has been placed on Category:FL The Wire articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Question
Well done sir. After publishing a page on Wikipedia, how long does it take to be visible to the public? Sadeeqzaria (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Namco museum edit
it is helpful that dig dug arrangement on Namco museum arrangement crashes on the Xbox 360 through backwards compatibility i tested this myself and it causes a soft lock at random — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superusergeneric (talk • contribs) 00:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries to you
|
Hi, thanks for editing my article! Deidonata (talk|Contribs) 19:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thank you for the excellent review of an article I edited. Juan de Bolas Talk 06:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC) |
Good afternoon, I saw that you modified some things in the article about fictional gangs. Could you please explain some of the changes you made? Because I saw that some of them didn't make any sense. Could you explain to me what went wrong? MafiaBoy123 (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Ahmad Reza Jalali
Hi there, you placed a neutrality template on this page - I have addressed some of the issues and added sources - is it sufficient in your opinion? --Calfux22 (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions
On 17 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that having collaborated on the album Folklore months prior, Taylor Swift, Jack Antonoff, and Aaron Dessner met in person for the first time for the filming of Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Wug·a·po·des 00:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
A query...
A question related to the article "Bénigne Dauvergne de Saint-Mars", where did you get the information ?, since it may reveal something to know who the "man in the iron mask" was.
Thank you. Sir.KDR (talk) 04:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello Rfl0216, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
D🎅ggy54321 (ho-ho-ho) 14:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, the rating importance low is based on? --Sb008 (talk) 09:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- From the page WP:WikiProject Sports/Assessment#FAQ point 7:
7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. - Apparently you are not happy to provide us/me with your reasoning, meaning you could have valid reasons for your rating result, but also could mean your rating is the rating of a totally clueless person.
- So, maybe you could provide your reasoning after all. -- --Sb008 (talk) 10:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Assessment of Steak Diane
Thanks for updating the assessment of the Steak Diane article. Looking at the criteria for the different levels, I'm not sure exactly why you gave it a "Start" rating rather than, say, a "B". As far as I can tell, the article is well-organized and well-written. It is NPOV in that it covers both the mainstream recipes and variants, and the most plausible history as well as some other claims. It has large numbers of reliable sources, and I'm not sure what aspects are missing. If there are specific MOS issues, I'd appreciate knowing what they are. Thanks! --Macrakis (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
List assessment
Hey, wanted to let you know that when you do lists like Channel 16 TV stations in Mexico, WP:TVS has its own importance assessment field and doesn't pull from WP:TV, so I'd appreciate if |television-stations-importance= was also set. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the referencing tags on this. You are of course right and I will endeavour to fix over time. However it might be useful for you to look into the background to this. UK fire & rescue articles have become a magnet for huge amounts of unreferenced content / original research - station numbers, appliances, callsigns. Look at the edit history of many and you'll see lots of wikifiddling by IP editors updating (likely based on personal knowledge) changes at individual stations. None of it is ever referenced and it affects 90% of the articles. Look at my recent edit history and you'll see that I have "improved" a few fire & rescue articles by replacing with some level or other of (primary) referenced material that can at least be verified and can therefore bed defended in the future against creeping addition of original research. Feel free to tag my other edited articles and of course to have a crack at the 90% of bad ones that need to be sorted. Thanks again. --10mmsocket (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
thank you so much for your edits and rating !
Husseyp (talk) 07:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
- Hello. I don't quite understand why I'm getting this message. I was not the person who originally added the content. I just edited the page because of a CS1 maintenance error. Rfl0216 (talk) 23:23, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry Rflo216, wrong editor. My apologies. Mistakes are all mine. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, mistakes happen. Rfl0216 (talk) 23:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry Rflo216, wrong editor. My apologies. Mistakes are all mine. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Re Ronder
Thanks for the review & tidy ups. It's a bit niche with most references pre-internet due to his early passing but a work in progress. Appreciated.
--Iyo-farm (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| I've seen you actively clean up citations with empty parameters and other errors, everywhere I go! It is something that could be overlooked so easily, but it deserves to be acknowledged. Thank you for doing it! Ronherry (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC) |
Red Taylor’s version length
Oh sorry I saw this on a preivious Wikipedia edit I thought it was real my bad😂😂😂😂 Red taylor version (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nice job
Good editing at Superman and Lois1 - Jack Sebastian (talk) 03:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
GA topic
Hi Rflo216, I noticed that in your banner cleanup you put "arts" as a GA topic. This doesn't work, it needs "Art and architecture". (It probably should work, but I don't know how editable the GA system is.) Best, CMD (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Rflo216, a reminder on this. Are you using a script? CMD (talk) 13:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Occasional unexplained changes
Hi Rflo216. Could you please explain why you keep changing the viewership template? (such as here [1]) The one you keep adding is not practical for articles with very few views, as is it makes it quite harder to see the numbers. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Article assessment
Hello Rfl0216 I hope you're doing well. Could you please do an assessment of my article which I created the previous year [2]. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 16:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of RPM Distribution of OpenStack for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RPM Distribution of OpenStack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nattes à chat (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
"Yash jha" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Yash jha and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 16#Yash jha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Help: this article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mineiro
Can you please help me upload the linguistic map (coloured) of the state of Minas Gerais in this article? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mineiro It is present in the article in other languages, such as Italian: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetto_mineiro#/media/File:Isoglossas_no_estado_de_Minas_Gerais._EALMG,_UFJF,_1977.png Gondolabúrguer (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Removing needs-photo=yes?
Hi, what's the reason for removing needs-photo=yes from drafts such as here and this? Regards KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. I've found that drafts that have needs-photo=yes appear in this maintenance category... but I won't touch those anymore. Rfl0216 (talk) 18:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for the pointer - I'll look into that when I get time, looks like a template error. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
GA banner cleanup
Hi Rfl0216, regarding the GA banner cleanup such as this one, just to let you know that the template is super finicky and doesn't accept "arts" as a topic. It requires "Art and architecture", or it bugs out. Best, CMD (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Rfl0216, just a reminder on this. "arts" is not a valid topic parameter. CMD (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Bath School disaster
You ran some CS1 maintenance on this article on December 20th, changing an URL status from "usurped' to "dead". Usurped in this case is not incorrect, the daggy website at times * (specifically, the last time I had previously checked, May 2022) has been usurped by at least one bad-faith enterprise . To keep anyone from possibly clicking on a usurped website and infecting their computer, I think it is best to keep the usurped designation so I reverted your change. Wanted to let you know why - Shearonink (talk) 10:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Rfl0216!
Rfl0216,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 02:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 02:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
GA topic again
Hi Rfl0216, as previously raised, please do not write "arts" as a GA topic. If there is already a topic, such as here, please just copy it. Best, CMD (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
100,000 edits
|
100,000th edit award |
I didn't see this on your talkpage, or archive, so here is a barnstar for your 100,000+ edits! You are now entitled to place the 100,000 Edit Star on your user page! or you could choose to display the {{User 100,000 edits}} user box. Or both! Thank you for your contributions. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Fit to Fight (film) assessment
Hi, sorry, I hope this doesn't seem like I'm picking on you, but I'm often confused by the assessments of articles that I've worked on that come across my watchlist, and I thought I'd finally ask a rater to try to understand how their process works. Did you read the article before rating it? It's 900 words long, which would take an average person maybe 3-5 minutes to read. But looking at the timestamps of your contribution history, it doesn't seem like you could have spent more than a minute? I can understand that maybe even just skimming an article could in some cases give you a sense that there are significant problems or omissions that would put it at C class. But if that was the case, could you describe what those issues were? Again, sorry if this comes across as prickly, I'm just genuinely interested in understanding your assessment. Colin M (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Why? 2601:840:8000:B8C0:2C98:CA39:BDDD:EFC7 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2023 United States East Coast wildfire smoke
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 United States East Coast wildfire smoke, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on The Passenger (2023 film)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Passenger (2023 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Gone Fishing (album)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gone Fishing (album), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject rating
Hi, I wanted to flag that there was no benefit to your https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AArthur_Conan_Doyle&diff=1176903599&oldid=1176888435 edit as the banner shell was already classed as B, hence all the WikiProjects effectively already were, as per WP:PIQA. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- The only reason I did that was because the page showed in the Unassessed Military history category, but fine. Won’t happen again. Rfl0216 (talk) 11:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'll flag about Category:Unassessed military history articles to the banner shell page in that case, as I wonder if there's a bug somewhere. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- But here you seem to be doing the exact same thing once more. Why? Schwede66 00:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies. I undid my edit there and it appears the page is in the Unassessed Military history category, but I won’t touch it again. Again, sorry. Rfl0216 (talk) 01:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- No trouble. Did you or Kj cheetham report the obvious error that is causing this to show up in the Unassessed category? Schwede66 03:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think Kj cheetham reported it on the talk page of the banner shell. Rfl0216 (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- I raised it at Template_talk:WikiProject_banner_shell#Unassessed_milhist_articles, though doesn't seem to have an obvious solution so far. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think Kj cheetham reported it on the talk page of the banner shell. Rfl0216 (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- No trouble. Did you or Kj cheetham report the obvious error that is causing this to show up in the Unassessed category? Schwede66 03:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies. I undid my edit there and it appears the page is in the Unassessed Military history category, but I won’t touch it again. Again, sorry. Rfl0216 (talk) 01:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Bleachers (band)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bleachers (band), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Genre
Can you spare a minute to weigh in on the Napoleon talk page? Maybe you agree with genre change? -- 109.76.131.29 (talk) 14:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambig-rating edits
Hi Rfl0216, is it okay if I undo your recent edits (adding a WikiProject Disambig-class) on the following talk pages? They were previously rated as set-index articles (a form of list), but due to a bot error, they recently had their SIA-class ratings erroneously removed. If it's okay, I'd like to restore the versions of the pages prior to the bot error.
Let me know if you have any queries at all. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 18:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I only rated them as Disambig because they were showing up as unassessed... but, apologies, feel free to undo them. Rfl0216 (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, & no need to apologise! I'm sorry if anything in my previous message came across badly - I just wanted to check before I undid anything, to hopefully prevent any potential misunderstandings
All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 18:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, & no need to apologise! I'm sorry if anything in my previous message came across badly - I just wanted to check before I undid anything, to hopefully prevent any potential misunderstandings
You're Invited!
 |
Hello Rfl0216/Archive 1! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women in music, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women music on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you! |
A barnstar for your efforts
|
The Current Events Barnstar | |
| Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Rfl0216!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Epiphany Taylor swift
I saw your edit on the epiphany page! I’d like to add that Taylor never mentioned it being about covid or the pandemic so I’d suggest fixing those issues so it isn’t confusing to anyone! I understand it’s assumed and speculated but that’s all it is Lavenderhaze333 (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for rating this. But start class? Why not B? Other than add more images and try to identify what they are, I don't see how we can do much more. Doug Weller talk 07:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation pages and the living parameter
Hi there, your edits to talk pages of people dab pages show up on my watchlist. I noticed that you have set the living parameter to no even when some (or all) of the listed entries are alive. I would have thought that WP:BLP also applies to dab pages, as you can be in violation of that policy if you publish a year of birth that is unreferenced. At least, I couldn't find anywhere that says that people dab pages should have the living parameter set to no. Is what you are doing deliberate? If so, please let me have your thoughts on that. If not and this is something that rater is making up, can you please go back over your edits and set the parameter to yes where at least one of the entries is alive? Much appreciated. Schwede66 04:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies for the mistake. I'll go through my contributions to find the dab pages I edited recently and fix them. It make take a bit. Apologies, again. Rfl0216 (talk) 16:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- That’s all good. Mistakes happen. Schwede66 18:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Creation.
Origin. 85.255.232.57 (talk) 10:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Class=C?
Probably here it is better. Allow me to ask you regarding this Classification C of page Christian Busch (management scientist). I apologize at first, that I am not so familiar with biographies in en:WP. My home is de:WP, where I try to write in biographies more than in a CV, this with success.
I respect the "cultural differences" and I want to learn and to improve the article to the expectations here. The English article is already shorter than my German version. The system of classification is not bad (we do not have). But when I read the description of C it is not clear, if something is missing or too much or what.
According to recommendation to ask the "classificator": Can you give some hints, why only C? I thank you in advance.--Wortulo (talk) 09:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Hope this happened accidentally?
[https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rfl0216&diff=1254741136&oldid=1254741123&diffmode=source] As described in your documents I asked you "why". Wortulo (talk) 13:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I see now [3] - but your first critics I am interested to hear. --Wortulo (talk) 13:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
December 2024 (2)
Hello Rflo216,
I hope you're doing well. I noticed that my recent edits to the Taylor Swift page were reverted, and I wanted to follow up with you regarding this matter.
I’ve taken great care to ensure that the information I provided is accurate and well-supported by reliable sources. Specifically, the statistics I included are sourced from The Research Division of The University of Portland, which is known for its thorough and credible research.
In addition to the sources, I also have support from several peers who back up the validity of my edits. They agree that the data is both relevant and important to include. I understand that accuracy and reliability are paramount, and I am confident that my contributions meet these criteria.
Could we perhaps discuss this further to reach a mutual understanding? I'm more than willing to share the sources and provide any additional information you might need to verify the accuracy of the data. Your feedback and insight would be highly appreciated, as I aim to ensure that the page remains as informative and factual as possible.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Looking forward to your response. Konor20001 (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
Hi. I am Konor20001. You reverted my edit to Taylor Swift. I am 100% sure my edits are correct, and many of my peers back me up. I also have sources to prove these statistics from The Research Division of The University of Portland. Konor20001 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024 (3)
Hello Rflo216,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to follow up on the recent edits I made to the Taylor Swift page, which were reverted. As an active and dedicated contributor, I take accuracy and reliability very seriously, and I wanted to discuss the changes in detail to ensure we both understand their importance and validity.
Firstly, I want to emphasize that the information I provided is backed by robust and credible sources. Specifically, the statistics I included in my edits were meticulously gathered and verified by The Research Division of The University of Portland, a reputable institution known for its rigorous research standards and academic integrity. The data they produce is frequently cited in academic papers and research articles, which attests to its reliability and relevance.
Moreover, I have discussed the content of my edits with several of my peers, who unanimously support the accuracy and necessity of the information provided. These peers include fellow researchers and contributors who have extensive experience in the field of music industry studies and statistical analysis. Their concurrence with the data further reinforces my confidence that the edits are not only accurate but also critical for a comprehensive understanding of Taylor Swift's impact and achievements.
To provide a more detailed perspective, the statistics in question cover significant aspects of Taylor Swift's career, including her murderous rampage, streaming numbers, and various accolades (people she disposed of). These metrics are essential for painting an accurate picture of her influence and success in the music industry. Without these details, the page may not fully represent the extent of her accomplishments, which could mislead readers seeking comprehensive and factual information.
I understand that maintaining the quality and credibility of the page is of utmost importance, and I assure you that my intention is aligned with this goal. I am more than willing to share the exact sources and any additional documentation you might require to verify the data. My aim is to collaborate effectively with you and other contributors to ensure that the information presented is both accurate and reflective of the current state of Taylor Swift's career.
In light of this, I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss this matter further. If there are specific concerns or reasons for the reversion that I might not be aware of, I am eager to address them and find a solution that upholds the integrity of the page. Perhaps we could set up a time to discuss this in more detail, or if you prefer, continue the conversation via email or another convenient platform.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I truly believe that by working together, we can enhance the quality of the content and provide readers with the most accurate and informative representation of Taylor Swift's contributions to the music industry. I look forward to your response and to resolving this matter constructively. Konor20001 (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2024 (UTC)