User talk:RachelTensions/Archive 1

Archive 1

Hands Up (NCT New Team song)

I boldly move the page as per WP:NOTRM. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 13:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I submitted it for discussion as I thought it might be controversial as it was previously moved before, but since you were the original mover in the first place I guess there's no need. RachelTensions (talk) 13:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:NCT Wish albums has been nominated for deletion

Category:NCT Wish albums has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:Riize has been nominated for deletion

Category:Riize has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Username

Hey there, welcome to Wikipedia! I hate to be a stickler about this stuff, but I'm concerned your username might contravene our username policy—obviously I can see how it's meant to be inoffensive or tongue-in-cheek, but its derivation from "racial tensions" might rankle some. Remsense ‥ 论 06:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Get a Guitar (song) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Get a Guitar (song). Thanks! 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 08:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

fixed, thanks. RachelTensions (talk) 08:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

fixed again RachelTensions (talk) 09:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Get a Guitar (song) has been accepted

Get a Guitar (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 10:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Get a Guitar (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Memories (Riize song) has been accepted

Memories (Riize song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love 119 has been accepted

Love 119, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 03:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riizing Day has been accepted

Riizing Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 05:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talk Saxy has been accepted

Talk Saxy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 10:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Moment: A Minor has been accepted

The Moment: A Minor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 05:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: I Like the Way (EP) has been accepted

I Like the Way (EP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 04:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Moment: Bounce has been accepted

The Moment: Bounce, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 15:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Kim Woojin concert tours has been accepted

List of Kim Woojin concert tours, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 17:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Your username

It's pretty obvious your username is meant to be a pun on "racial tensions". Why? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

It's a character from To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar and partially my real name. Thanks. RachelTensions (talk) 23:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh damn, so sorry for assuming there was some ulterior motive behind it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

No worries RachelTensions (talk) 23:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

I was wondering what your comment meant Liliana. Rachel is a common name. Knitsey (talk) 23:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

You have been whaled for being an extremely annoying editor

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

The Blue Rider 23:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Here are some clouds for you to watch while we wait for our block

The Blue Rider 23:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Sincere apologies

Sending this as a good faith apology. I did not intend to insult, hurt, upset you etc. It's not my intention as an editor on this encyclopedia, and am hoping this kitten (praying you do not dislike the feline family) is a chance to possibly move beyond the situaiton earlier today.

livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, it is appreciated. RachelTensions (talk) 17:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

No need to create redirects and then afterwards having to go to WP:RMTR

Hey there, I saw your request for the moves of Dreamscape (album) and Frequency (EP) earlier today and noticed that you created redirects at both those pages shortly prior to requesting the move of the drafts to those articles. Next time, you can just skip creating a redirect first and instead just WP:MOVE the page from the draft directly onto the redlink yourself. Happy editing :) Raladic (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

@Raladic yeah I know, I didn't expect there to be enough information on the albums yet to be able to pull together an article so that's why I created the redirects when I did the drafts... once I started writing the drafts it became clear that there was at least enough for a semi-useful article on the subjects to pass muster with WP:NMUSIC. Thanks for the help! RachelTensions (talk) 03:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Ah I see, makes sense :)

I think for the the Draft:Frequency (EP) one, instead of having tagged it with G6, you could have moved that one WP:MOVEOVERREDIRECT as it only had your one single edit, which you could have done yourself directly without page mover permissions if that current target only had 1 single edit as it did at that time, so just something to keep in mind for next time :) Raladic (talk) 03:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

I tried moving it myself for both and it wouldn't let me overwrite the redirect, even though there was just one single entry in the page history... no idea why. RachelTensions (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Ah ok fair enough, maybe there's some special rule for cross namespace (since it was a move from draft to mainspace).

Well in any case then, I guess just continue as normal then and pop in at RMTR as you did when you need assistance :) Raladic (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

@Raladic Yeah, starting to think WP:MOVEOVERREDIRECT might be broken. Just tried to usurp Hyunjin, which is a redirect with only one entry in the history, with Hwang Hyun-jin which is already in mainspace, and it still didn't work. Weird. RachelTensions (talk) 16:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Interesting, you could maybe create a post about it on WP:AN or so. Raladic (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

@Raladic problem solved, the conditions allowable for a move over redirect are a single line in the page history and the redirect must already be pointing to the article attempting to be moved. RachelTensions (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Hyunjin at Global Cyber University

Hello you recently edited the addition of Global cyber University to Hyunjin's Wikipedia page under education, citing that it is not relevant to him as a person, could you clarify this

[1] Fanmadehenecia (talk) 06:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Sure. Basically, we don't include everything in the infobox - we include relevant information. In the case of the education field in the infobox, his attendance at Global Cyber University is irrelevant to anything he has done with regard to his notability. His School of Performing Arts Seoul education is included because it is relevant to his notability - he is a performer. But whatever he's doing at Global Cyber University is irrelevant to any of his notability, and, as far as anyone knows, he hasn't graduated.

MOS:INFOEDU states "It is usually not relevant to include either parameter for non-graduates" and Template:Infobox person says "Education, e.g., degree, institution and graduation year, if relevant."

Additionally, the additions of Global Cyber University weren't backed up by WP:Reliable sources. RachelTensions (talk) 06:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Seunghan

Hi Rachel. After you pinged me back to the Teahouse thread, I took a look at your draft. It looks fine to me and should sail through AfC I think: I'm not an AfC reviewer. The only thing you should probably check is the copyright status of the images, which you captured from YouTube videos. Although some videos there are licenced CC BY, I didn't see that tag when I looked at these particular ones. However, I've no experience with that so maybe you are confident these are OK? Best wishes: next step after acceptance is WP:DYK! Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for having a look Michael, I appreciate your feedback. I'm confident the images are freely licensed, both images are captured from videos that were freely licensed by their copyright holders (if you expand the description of the videos on Youtube the license is "License: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" tag at the very bottom.)

Thanks again RachelTensions (talk) 15:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Can we have a truce?

Hi, can we please have a truce? I already sent a Wikilove fox apologizing for our previous interactions. Why do you still feel the need to try to get administrator attention for stuff that is completely unrelated to you and has already been dealt with? The Blue Rider 17:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2NE1 Welcome Back tour poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2NE1 Welcome Back tour poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frequency (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Title track.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RachelTensions. Thank you for your work on Prezent. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

It is now. RachelTensions (talk) 07:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Dear Racechel, do you know what hydrophobic effect is? I know but asked AI because of curiosity. Here is the answer: "The hydrophobic effect, for instance, is fundamental in areas like biochemistry, molecular biology, and pharmaceutical development—fields that affect our daily lives, from understanding how drugs interact with the body to insights into the origins of life. But this knowledge doesn’t get as much attention as pop culture, even though it’s highly impactful in real-world terms.". This is not a perfect answer, but close. The hydrophopic effect, for wich Andrew Pohorille together with Larry Pratt and Richard Chandler found a theorethical explanation is today broadly applied in beauty industry as a base for hydrating products. But this is not a scientific achievement. The article published in PNAS is also not a scientific achievement. Not enough to have a Wikipedia page. But this did not get much coverage in mass media. I am sure that the color of dresses that Hilton girls wear got a lot. And most likely they have wikipedia pages. Aleksandra6617 (talk) 07:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello Rachel, please ask AI about Andrew Pohorille. I asked. Here is the answer I got: Who was Andrew Pohorille?

Andrew Pohorille (May 14, 1949 – January 6, 2024) was a distinguished theoretical and statistical physicist known for his work in computational biology, the origin of life, and astrobiology. Throughout his career, he made significant contributions to our understanding of molecular dynamics, biophysics, and the prebiotic chemistry that may have led to the emergence of life on Earth.

Career and Achievements:

           •          Academic Positions: Pohorille held academic positions at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), where he was a professor in the Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry. He also served as a faculty member at NASA Ames Research Center, contributing to various astrobiology and computational projects.

           •          Research Focus: His primary research focused on using computational methods to test hypotheses about the origin of life, with an emphasis on understanding the structure and dynamics of biological membranes, ion channels, and other molecular systems. He used computer simulations to model complex biological phenomena, helping to elucidate the physical and chemical conditions that might have supported the earliest life forms.

           •          Key Contributions:

           •          Hydrophobic Effect: Pohorille worked extensively on the hydrophobic effect, which plays a crucial role in the folding of proteins and the behavior of cell membranes.

           •          Astrobiology: He contributed to the establishment of the NASA Astrobiology Institute and was involved in drafting the Astrobiology Roadmap. His work helped shape research on the origins of life on Earth and the detection of life on other planets.

           •          Computational Modeling: Pohorille developed methods for calculating the free energy profiles of complex molecular systems, which are crucial for understanding biological processes at the molecular level.

           •          Awards: Throughout his career, Pohorille received numerous honors, including the NASA Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal (2002) and the NASA Exceptional Services Medal (2023). He also received the H. Julian Allen Award for his work on free energy calculations in computational chemistry.

Legacy:

Andrew Pohorille’s contributions to the field of computational chemistry and astrobiology have had a lasting impact on the scientific community. His interdisciplinary approach, blending physics, chemistry, and biology, provided valuable insights into some of the fundamental processes that underlie life itself. His work continues to inspire scientists working in the fields of biophysics, molecular biology, and astrobiology.

Is this enough for the wikipedia page or still not? At the draft page are references to all what AI found.

Regards Aleksandra6617 (talk) 08:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Can you point to which WP:NACADEMIC criteria, in specific, you believe Mr. Pohorille meets? RachelTensions (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

It takes 10 secend and even chatGPT (no money) is enough. And this is exactly what is in the draft page. The difference is that at this page are references to articles published in a very good scientific journals plus scientific metrica like numeber of citations etc. He was a hard working scientist and was not wasting time for interviews with journalists but this iis possible to find some if this is necessary. Still, it seems to be not a very good criterion to evaluate a scientist. Aleksandra6617 (talk) 08:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Apt. (song)

Hi, thank you for your contributions. Please see WP:RMCI#Step-by-step closing procedure for a how-to on withdrawing your RM. 162 etc. (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Além do Guarda Roupa

May I know why you changed the article I created about the series "Além do Guarda Roupa" without my permission? I worked hard to put together that article to move it so that you can go there and ruin all the hard work that took me weeks to put together. You should have at least asked permission to change some things on that one. Just ask me. I wanted to know why you changed a large part of my article without my permission? I'm extremely upset with everything you did... MafiaBoy123 (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a collaborative project and nobody owns any articles, nor is permission necessary before changing any articles: see WP:OWN. RachelTensions (talk) 00:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Speak for yourself, because it took me a long time to research and put correct information for someone like you to come and go there and mess up my hard work. Also, if you are such a fan of Korean culture, you would know that what you did was disrespectful, as I have been here on Wikipedia longer than you, so yes, you were very disrespectful to me... MafiaBoy123 (talk) 10:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

As I said, Wikipedia is a collaborative project and you do not own any articles on it. No permission was needed. Also, the superiority complex is unnecessary. RachelTensions (talk) 10:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of SM Entertainment artists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Key.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

charlotte ^👸♥ 03:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

2016 census information edit

Does this edit offend? Draftdeluxe (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

That exact information has been the subject of an edit war in the past and should be discussed on the article's talk page if you wish to remove it. RachelTensions (talk) 22:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Perhaps that is an indication the status quo requires changing. Draftdeluxe (talk) 22:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

That's fine as long as a consensus with other editors is reached on the article's talk page prior to the information being removed. RachelTensions (talk) 22:24, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Standard notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

New merge/notability discussion at Brian Thompson (businessman)

Hello there! I noticed you recently participated in a discussion of a requested move for the article Brian Thompson (businessman). That discussion was closed without an ultimate consensus decision for procedural reasons. There is a new discussion open on the article talk page, and all participants in the prior move discussion are encouraged to participate. Thank you! Flip^andFlopped ツ 22:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi RachelTensions, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

This Draft needs to be fixed

I made a draft, but it needs to be fixed. Draft:Lebanon, Iowa is too short and does not cite any sources. I am looking for sources. I found .org and .gov websites, but they don't show results about the neighborhood, so they show results for Iowa itself and Lebanon the country, and for ones about the neighborhood, they don't contain that much information about this neighborhood. Can you please help improve this draft? NicePrettyFlower (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi RachelTensions. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! charlotte ^👸🎄 06:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

I also granted autopatrolled. charlotte ^👸🎄 06:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Seunghan

On 16 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Seunghan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Seunghan (pictured) was forced out of his band because of a cigarette and a kiss? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seunghan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Seunghan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 29,639 views (1,235.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 debut EPs

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 debut EPs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:26, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

"Edit War" on Cleavage Page

Hi Rachel

No there is no edit war. I attempted to remove rape myths and sexist stereotypes from a page which is harmful to women. A few people disagreed with this based on "weird titles" and reverted the article back. I am absolutely fine with people changing the formatting if need be, and altering the format of the titles - but reverting the whole article back seems excessive. Users have opted to include rape myths and sexist stereotyping, along with innapropriate language such as depicting what men like about women's breasts, that a woman's breasts can be "wet" to improve cleavage etc - which is highly inappropriate, especially if a child should access this page.

I attempted to revert less than 5 times and I will no longer attempt to edit the page as it is clear that people do not care about propagating rape myths and sexist stereotyping and they will happily put men's "opinions" about women's breasts with sources that are not peer-reviewed or backed up by scientific evidence...but apparently if I attempt to write a disclaimer that these "studies" should be considered as theoretical and not to be taken as fact - I am then reported for violation.

As such it is best at this time that I no longer edit this page and instead escalate the issue. I refuse to engage in any 'edit war'. It is pointless and will not help.

Thank you. Trj56msn (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Dear Jinri

On 19 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dear Jinri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a documentary film built around the final interview of K-pop star Sulli employs elements of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz as a framing device? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dear Jinri. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dear Jinri), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambig

Could you take a look at and resolve the disambig Yi Su-jin? If not I can do it! I'm not 100% sure of some of the details of how to manage and figured you'd be seefooddiet (talk) 08:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Sure, I will have a look today. At the very least we need to move from Yi to Lee (nobody being disambiguated there is commonly romanized as Yi) RachelTensions (talk) 14:05, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Also note that that redlink I added; I'm going to create an article for that person in the next day or so. seefooddiet (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello RachelTensions, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 21:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 21:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Username

Hi! I replied to a comment of yours at RfD a few minutes ago and I just wanted to say that your username is hilarious. Truly great work. Loytra (talk) 16:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2025!

	Happy New Year 2025!

Aidillia^(talk) 10:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seunghan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seunghan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Blitzkriegswunder -- Blitzkriegswunder (talk) 10:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, RachelTensions!

Happy New Year!

RachelTensions,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seunghan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seunghan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of All Tomorrows No Yesterdays -- All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seunghan

The article Seunghan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seunghan for comments about the article, and Talk:Seunghan/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of All Tomorrows No Yesterdays -- All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (talk) 05:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

"Your requested move has been contested"

Hey RachelTensions! As a fellow peruser of RM/TR, I noticed that you went through a lot of the contested requests, pinging the nominator with the message "Your requested move has been contested. If you wish to continue, please open a full requested move discussion using the "discuss" link in your original request."

This looks extremely useful for nominators who may not be aware that their RM was contested or who don't know how to open a discussion, especially when they continue arguing at RM/TR instead of opening a discussion. But it also might be needlessly repetitive.

What's your reasoning behind this? Will you keep doing this for all contested requests where the nom wasn't pinged? Perhaps it's sensible, but maybe we can find a better solution, like getting a bot to do this, or requiring contesting editors to ping the nom. Toadspike [Talk] 09:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

There’s just a lot sitting in the contested area lately so I’m trying to get people back to either move their requests to RMs or withdraw their requests so they can be cleaned out of that section. RachelTensions (talk) 11:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I agree that the contested TRs have been piling up, but that's probably just because there were a lot of TRs in the last few days. I'm pretty sure contested requests get removed after three days (not sure if by a bot or a human) so I wouldn't worry about forcing people to take action. Toadspike [Talk] 12:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

(You shouldn't take this as a "warning" to stop doing what you're doing. The pings and info, as I said earlier, could be really useful for nominators. Just letting you know that the "backlog" is not quite as dire as you fear.) Toadspike [Talk] 12:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)