User talk:Tavantius

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2024/September;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Re: 1936 NIO

Good job so far on that! IBTRACS has a bunch of storms from 1936, so be sure to add those too. Also, you might want to try finding newspaper sources. Have you ever heard of the Wikipedia Library, where users can get access to newspaper archives? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For your first opinion, that's what I'm currently doing. And for your second, I've not been here for six months, meaning I can't access it. OhHaiMark (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. Well, you're doing a great service going through the IMD reports. There could probably be an article for every NIO season going back to 1900. It's just going to take people some time researching everything. So kudos to that. Especially finding that deadly Myanmar storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, while l was looking at the IMD, they stated that there were reports as far back as the 1860s, and the WikiProject Tropical Cyclones have reports going back to 1891. OhHaiMark (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, it could probably go back before 1900, given how many deadly storms there are each year in the basin. I was looking into the 1936 storms. This source has a bit of info on some older storms, for example that Myanmar cyclone in April produced a storm surge of 5 meters. It also has info on an October storm in India. You'll be surprised what you find just by a good Google with some specific search results. You're definitely on the right track for the article. Just try getting a bit of info for every storm before publishing. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job finishing the article! I know how much time it takes compiling all of those sources, but the effort is appreciated. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jammu and Kashmir Awami Ittehad Party

please help and please tell me is something is wrong in it? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Jammu_and_Kashmir_Awami_Ittehad_Party — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarim Wani (talk • contribs) 10:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking Question

You fellow rejected my draft Draft: Mandya railway station. I had copied and pasted from the another article Shrirangapattana railway station, why you didn't any action on that article till date or that article invisible to you? Lakyanaik Lambani (talk) 09:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just because an article contains unsourced content, doesn't mean that this should. Also, I didn't reject it, I just declined it as some portions were unsourced. In fact, if you did cite those sections, I'd happily accept it. Tavantius (talk) 02:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sialia

I'm wondering whether the village actually is the primary topic for Sialia, or whether the draft should be moved to Sialia (village). What made you choose the village as the ptopic? Cheers, Cremastra (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as there's already a DAB on the top of the draft, I determined that the draft could be accepted like that. Additionally, most sources which refer to the bluebird refer to it as Sialia sialus, so I didn't think it needed to stay like that. OhHaiMark (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 00:30:12, 19 September 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by FinnWilson

FinnWilson (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Common Core Ontologies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! Could you further clarify in what way the page for Common Core Ontologies doesn't meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations? Is it that there aren't enough citations? It seemed like a high density of citations to me, but I could be wrong.

FinnWilson (talk) 00:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Hamoon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Hamoon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Hamoon

The article Cyclone Hamoon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cyclone Hamoon and Talk:Cyclone Hamoon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

your declined Draft : Md Zillul Karim Improved

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bintyamin20248 was:

improved

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Md Zillul Karim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bintyamin20248 (talk) 22:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I hope this message finds you well.

I wanted to update you on the status of the draft article Draft:Md Zillul Karim. Following the previous review, we have made several improvements to the draft. Keith D, an experienced Wikipedian, has provided valuable feedback and corrections to address the concerns raised earlier.

We have incorporated these suggestions to enhance the article’s quality and alignment with Wikipedia’s standards. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at the revised draft and provide any further feedback or approval.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Bintyamin20248 (talk) 22:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Hamoon

The article Cyclone Hamoon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyclone Hamoon for comments about the article, and Talk:Cyclone Hamoon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 23:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1936 North Indian Ocean cyclone season has been accepted

1936 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Ellie has been accepted

Typhoon Ellie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft of Simon L. Dolan

Hi, Thank you for reviewing Draft:Simon L. Dolan. Regarding the notability issue: I think that since Prof. Dolan has held a named chair in ESADE Business School, he satisfies Criterion 5 of the requirements in Wikipedia:Notability (academics).

Regarding the sources issue: I have replaced many references with independent sources . Please note that usually a researcher’s web page at a university site is considered a good source to establish that he works there, even though it is connected to him. The same should apply to refs to his articles that show the scope of his research. Would appreciate if you could review the edited draft again. Adig-pt (talk) 07:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast and positive action on this article! Adig-pt (talk) 06:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Tavantius, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you marked ‘Ali Karki’ as reviewed. Could you please explain which notability guidelines it meets? If you believe it does not meet notability guidelines, as suggested by the notability tag you added, why did you mark it as reviewed? If you think the subject is not notable, you should take the article to AfD before marking it as reviewed. If you’re unsure about its notability, just place the notability tag without marking it as reviewed, so that other reviewers can review it and potentially take it to AfD. GrabUp - Talk 17:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Helene (2024) (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Tropical Storm Helene (2024) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hurricane Helene (2024) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 15:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tavantius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tavantius (talk) 15:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]