User talk:Piotrus/Archive 61
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Piotrus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | → | Archive 65 |
WikiCup 2019 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
- L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
- Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
- MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
- Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
- Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
- Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).
Thanks for the message. Yes it's dispiriting as these people are underrepresented and all eminent in their fields :-( Not sure if I have the time or energy for a second flurry of activity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jobaileydesigner (talk • contribs) 07:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Citing you
Hey Piotrus,
Just to clarify something: in the AE discussion on Tatzref I cited a comment you made, not quoted it; ergo, the statement in parentheses was mine. As for "main claim" - you used the term "key claim"; if you feel "main" was wrong, then accept my apology.
Cheers. François Robere (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Walrusoft
As this company probably is not notable enough for its own article (I found only passing mentions in CBM related magazines) I redirected the article you proded to their best known product (BASIC 8). Although target article is in a horrible state (no RS refs), it shouldn´t be a problem to establish notability (plenty of reviews in various magazines of the late 80s). Pavlor (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your response, yes I am interested in writing more Polish articles in the future, and I added my name in the project though I am still learning editing on Wikipedia. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by T Magierowski (talk • contribs) 10:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
re deletion of Cascade Premium Lager
Hey, I got pinged on this, my 2005 edit on this was to move it to Cascade Brewery, which is a good article, it can just be switched to a redirect. Justinc (talk) 10:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Please don't do spurious nomination of articles
If you wish to nominate articles for deletion please do it with an evidence-base, not for spurious reasons. A basic simple set of google news searches or visiting the website of the company should be a basic requirement by the proponent. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Atlas Hydrographic deletion
Hi. Just to say that I've got no objection to deletion of the article, given it's got so little interest. Alternatively, how about a redirect to the parent company? Then avoids someone recreating the article. John Smith's (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Eiss Archive
On 12 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eiss Archive, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Eiss Archive is composed of materials that document the rescue of Jews threatened by the Holocaust through the efforts of Polish diplomats? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eiss Archive. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Eiss Archive), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Alfons Zgrzebniok
Hello! Your submission of Alfons Zgrzebniok at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
GNG vs NORG
I'm a newcomer to the AfD process, and I'm trying to get a better understanding of how the community assesses the notability of organizations and companies. In your !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Famous Kenton Club, you said that the bar fails WP:NORG because it has only received coverage in local sources. I'm curious: would you vote the same way if WP:AUD was not in the picture and you were only assessing the article for general notability? The articles from Portland Tribune ([1]) and Portland Mercury ([2]) discuss the bar directly and in detail; the Willamette Week source is arguably significant coverage as well ([3]). These are all reliable sources, in my opinion. Do you think they're enough to pass the regular GNG requirements? Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- What in particular about local sources keeps them from satisfying WP:GNG? Do you think they're not independent? Not significant? Something else? Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- That is certainly a gray area. But that isn't an argument against local sources per se; it's just a question of what is a local source. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Nationalization in Poland
On 19 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nationalization in Poland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the reversal of post-World War II nationalization in Poland resulted in considerable amounts of chaos and fraud? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nationalization in Poland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nationalization in Poland), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Zenodo links
Users on Talk:Zenodo pointed out that it's difficult to edit the article due to the blacklist. Is it time to revisit the decision and if so could you file a request to that purpose? Whatever "emergency" there was back then has since expired: in particular, I'm currently barred from adding links to zenodo.org (and I'm sorry that other users are harmed, but I may be considered involved).
By the way, I suspect that some decisions made in November would have been different without certain misleading information provided by two very active and now-disgraced users (who were acting in good faith but were seemingly in the midst of a moral panic). Nemo 16:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. Nemo 14:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Seven years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Geography
Phil Rosen's article says he is from Olinka, Poland. Is this a place? Misspelling? Also, any idea what Shochtiz and Paks is? The Eliezer Zussman-Sofer article refers to it.. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: I'll reply on that article's talk. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Piotrus, thanks for looking into it for me. I also did some digging. What I could find is at Draft:Olinka.
- As far as Shochitz and Pak, that is noted at Eliezer Zussman-Sofer. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Paks seems linked properly. Shochtiz, no idea. You may want to speak to someone who speaks Hungarian and Yddish, I don't. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Fall of the communism listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fall of the communism. Since you had some involvement with the Fall of the communism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from Commodore Amiga MIDI Driver, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Pavlor (talk) 08:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Julieanna Preston
I am now sorry for removing the PROD. I sure did learn a lot, but I probably could have done that without wasting so many of Wikipedia's man-hours. Thanks Dushan Jugum (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC).
This Month in Education: March 2019
Wikipedia Student Training
Hello, I am Chominkook in your Collective Intelligence class, and I finished Wikipedia training assignment this semester. Thank you, and see you next week! Chominkook (talk) 20:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am Sunghokyoung in your Sociology of Everyday life and Collective Intelligence classes, and I finished Wikipedia training assignment. Thank you. Sunghokyoung (talk)
Hello, I am Siyoung In in your Sociology of Everyday life class, and I finished Wikipedia training assignment last semester. Thank you. Siyoung In (talk) 06:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Professor.Piot! This is MinSeung Sung in Everyday Sociology! I already finished Student Training last semester! Ö00--SungMinSeung (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, professor piotr! This is Sung-an Cho in Everyday sociology! I finished student training this semester. Thank you --Sungancho951025 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, professor Piotr! This is Jina Park in Sociology of Everyday Life 2019. I completed the Wikipedia:Training/For students. Dina Park (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello professor. I'm Byeori Kim, in your class 'Group Intelligence 2019'. I completed the Wikipedia training. Thank you. Byeori Kim (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello professor. I am Zhang Peiyao the student in your Understanding Wikipedia 2019 class. I have already finished the training last semester and I just did it again this time.--Zhangpeiyao (talk) 08:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, professor. I'm Ju Hwan Kim, who takes class in group intelligence in 2019. I taked the Wikipedia editing training and leave a message.Have a nice day.Wnghksdl (talk) 22 March 2019 at 6pm
Hello, professor Piotr! This is Jina Park in Collective Intelligence 2019. I completed the Wikipedia:Training/For students. Dina Park (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, professor Piotr. I'm Min-hyun Bang, taking class 'Group Intelligence 2019'. I finished the Wikipedia training, so I'm leaving a message. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 방민현 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello professor Piotr. I'm Minju Park who take your group intelligence 2019 class. I finished the training. see you next class! -Mjphome (talk) 23:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello professor Piotr! I am Jeong Seo Yoon in your collective intelligence 2019 class. I finished the Wikipedia training!! I could learn so many things. Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeong Seo Yoon (talk • contribs) 19:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello professor. I'm yewon Lee, in your class 'Group Intelligence 2019'. I completed the Wikipedia training. Thank you. -Won96 (talk) 17:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am Ana Garcia, I am in your Sociology of Everyday life and Collective Intelligence classes, and I finished Wikipedia training assignment.--AnbyG (talk) 11:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Alfonse Pogrom
On 31 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfonse Pogrom, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1905, three days of violence in Warsaw were possibly sparked by a Bund activist trying to save his sister from sexual slavery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfonse Pogrom. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alfonse Pogrom), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
Bring your idea for Wikimedia in Education to life! Launch of the Wikimedia Education Greenhouse
Are you passionate about open education? Do you have an idea to apply Wikimedia projects to an education initiative but don’t know where to start? Join the the Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse! It is an immersive co-learning experience that lasts 9 months and will equip you with the skills, knowledge and support you need to bring your ideas to life. You can apply as a team or as an individual, by May 12th. Find out more Education Greenhouse. For more information reachout to mguadalupewikimedia.org |
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
[4]. Thank you for nominating it, and kudos goes to you for substantial improvement.GizzyCatBella (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Polanie (computer game) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Polanie (computer game), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Also it seems the article exists at Polanie (video game). No need to duplicate entries. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Translation request
@Piotrus: I want an article translated for me.[5].Catfurball (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Alfons Zgrzebniok
On 10 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfons Zgrzebniok, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alfons Zgrzebniok commanded the first two of the three Silesian Uprisings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfons Zgrzebniok. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alfons Zgrzebniok), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Polanie
I saw the notice on my talk page, and I agree about splitting things up here, and I promise I won't draft things again if from an experienced editor. Though shouldn't the article be called Polanie (video game) instead of Polanie (computer game)? "Computer game" is an unneccesary distinction that is rarely used on Wikipedia, and I don't see how Polanie is an exception. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK
Hello! Your submission of Maria Roszak at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Roman Sushchenko
On 11 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Roman Sushchenko, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roman Sushchenko. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Roman Sushchenko), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Hirohito/Hideki Tojo
I looked at the WW2 article and found it jarring to see Hirohito named alongside Hitler and Mussolini as Axis wartime leaders. I noticed you had commented on this in a talk page discussion. Do you think it is worth arguing the point to replace Hirohito with Hideki Tojo in the infobox as wartime leader. As you remarked on the talk page in 2018 the role of Hirohito is debated, he was useful for the military who really controlled Japan, as a figurehead and point of Nationalist and quasi religious devotion, but his war leadership was of a far different order to that of Hitler and Mussolini. Tojos role is unquestioned and was active, Hirohito was useful for the military but was he an instigator and active stoker of the fires of war as Hitler, Tojo, and Mussolini were? 78.147.45.52 (talk) 19:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Dear anon, feel free to start a new discussion about this at the WWII talk page. Talking about it here will not result in any chance, I am afraid. Ping me when you start a new discussion and I'll comment there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:44, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Mykola Semena
Hello! Your submission of Mykola Semena at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RRD (talk) 16:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Polanie (video game)
On 22 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polanie (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1996 video game Polanie is considered a cult classic in Poland? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Polanie (video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
RE
RE diff - responding here since it really is off-topic on that page - per - Knesset website - it was mainly supported by the opposition (running down the list of names - it seems almost all the opposition signed..... There is a backdrop here - Netanyahu was trying to minimize the whole Polish/Iraeli spat whereas the opposition (particularly Lapid) was trying to fan the flames) and has only been tabled (which means it went nowhere - Israeli MPs create thousands of bills - 6,644 bills, 5,756 queries: Was 20th Knesset a tale of quantity over quality?, TOI, April 2019 - most of them don't go anywhere - the bill is usually an excuse for a press-release and press-coverage - so there's bills on anything that is a media topic). Unlike the PR accompanying the bill - YNET (and the not very accurate quote above - it seems to be a summary of PR in the news but not of the bill) - the bill proposal itself is rather minute - it proposes to modify the existing 1986 Holocaust denial law by adding "by the Nazis and their helpers"
(which per my legal reading of the law is redundant - as the existing 1986 lawrefers to any crime against humanity/Jewish nation during the Nazi period - it is already not limited to Nazis specifically and would apply per my legal reading to denial of any crime against humanity during Nazi rule) + adding legal aid to Holocaust survivors/educators/researchers that are accused in foreign courts in relation to their testimony regarding the Holocaust or Holocaust denial (so this portion is the main response to the Polish legislation). In short - so far it hasn't gone up for a vote (3-4 required to be a bill) and hasn't even been assigned to a committee. It probably will be "dead" in the new session (following the April 2019 election) - a "continuation motion" needs to be passed for it to be "alive", IIRC.Icewhiz (talk) 10:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Literary experiment
I think you'll enjoy knowing about this: [6]/[7]/[8]. Jacek Dukaj is one of my favorite writers, btw. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the links, Piotrus!
- Jacek Dukaj appears to have followed a couple of approaches alternative to translation stricto sensu (he himself calls his Polish rendering of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness a "Polonization" rather than a "translation"): his appears to be 1. an "adapted translation"; 2. a "modern translation" (a rendering into present-day language). Which is well and good (in all the arts, people have been adapting entire works of predecessors, or at least stealing motifs from them), so long as he in fact does not claim that his version is actually a "translation".
- If my sense of the Polish language is accurate, Conrad's niece Aniela Zagórska was probably right in rendering the title "Heart of Darkness" paraphrastically as "Jądro ciemności" rather than metaphrastically ("literally") as "Serce ciemności". Conrad uses "heart" here in a geographical sense (the Congo lying roughly in the "heart" of Africa) as well as in a sense that is, I think, approximated by the Polish "sedno", as in "sedno sprawy" ("the heart of the matter").
- Dukaj would like, as much as possible, to do away with words, to get at direct experience. This is attempted by films; but what film cannot do, generally, is present abstractions, which are a forte of written language.
- On a different subject: I have a mnemonic for you: "though" ("choć") vs. "through" ("przez").
- I trust you are picking up some of the local language and culture: an invaluable experience, as Poland was for me! This kind of exposure transforms a person into an inter-cultural with improved binocular vision—as it did Conrad.
- Thanks again.
- Best, Nihil novi (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Icewhiz (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Icewhiz (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- In regards to "perhaps you meant to template yourself, have your own copy here, free of charge" - per Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Alerts -
"Editors issuing alerts are expected to ensure that no editor receives more than one alert per area of conflict per year. Any editor who issues alerts disruptively may be sanctioned."
. I was previously alerted, within the past 12 months, to both topic areas - 17 December 2018, 9 May 2018 - thus it would seem that you did not fulfill the requirements sent forth in the quoted section of AC/DS. I placed the alerts on your page only after checking the log and seeing no alerts.Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
BLP sourcing
You restored information on BLPs sourced to Canada Free Press - an "an online conservative tabloid."[1] If you'll take a peek at RSN - it's been rather roundly rejected as a source at all. It definitely is not a source for BLP information. The removal clearly contained the edit summary - " Canada Free Press is not remotely a RS, definitely not for BLPs. Uncited information removed as well"
. I will also note that I returned some of this information (e.g. the Drew Carey show) cited to bona-fida RSes. I strongly suggest you self-revert - BLP applies to any BLP information. Icewhiz (talk) 11:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Which BLP is subject to potentially problematic critique? Also, CFP is not a great source, but do you think they falsified the PAC letter they reprinted? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- CFP is not an acceptable source - it's an online tabloid - look at RSN. BLPs? Well Jimmy Kimmel, Drew Carey are BLPs. So is possibly Michael Preisler (absent evidence otherwise). non-reliable sources may not be used for any information on BLPs. The text you returned actually contained accusations of re-use "WWII-era Nazi propaganda" (it seems to me that the Polish cavalry charge was oft repeated outside of Nazi Germany - but regardless - you need a reasonable soruce for that). Icewhiz (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Just to avoid pointless argument, I've replaced this source with a Polish NGO that AFAIK hasn't got any red flags at RSN. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:17, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not acceptable. Again - I strongly suggest you self revert and remove any source that is not BLP suitable. the phi966.org website of what seems to be a very small NGO called "The Polish Heritage Institute" whose main page currently has " May the Suffering and Death of Christ Lead Us All to Sanctity and Eternal Life" and a simple perusal of the site uncovers various, umm, questionable theories on the Holocaust, The Smolensk Crash, and other items - is clearly not an acceptable source for BLP. If you can't find a mainstream source for Kimmel or Carey - it simply should be in. Icewhiz (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please discuss this on article's talk. Please note I've removed the mention of Carey, and I've added another source for Kimmel. Please take it to article's talk, not here, if you want to discuss this further. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- The next step here is possibly AE. Accusing BLPs of "repeating WWII-era Nazi propaganda" requires reasonable sourcing. I suggest you simply remove anything you don't have a mainstream source for.Icewhiz (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please discuss this on article's talk. Please note I've removed the mention of Carey, and I've added another source for Kimmel. Please take it to article's talk, not here, if you want to discuss this further. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not acceptable. Again - I strongly suggest you self revert and remove any source that is not BLP suitable. the phi966.org website of what seems to be a very small NGO called "The Polish Heritage Institute" whose main page currently has " May the Suffering and Death of Christ Lead Us All to Sanctity and Eternal Life" and a simple perusal of the site uncovers various, umm, questionable theories on the Holocaust, The Smolensk Crash, and other items - is clearly not an acceptable source for BLP. If you can't find a mainstream source for Kimmel or Carey - it simply should be in. Icewhiz (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Just to avoid pointless argument, I've replaced this source with a Polish NGO that AFAIK hasn't got any red flags at RSN. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:17, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- CFP is not an acceptable source - it's an online tabloid - look at RSN. BLPs? Well Jimmy Kimmel, Drew Carey are BLPs. So is possibly Michael Preisler (absent evidence otherwise). non-reliable sources may not be used for any information on BLPs. The text you returned actually contained accusations of re-use "WWII-era Nazi propaganda" (it seems to me that the Polish cavalry charge was oft repeated outside of Nazi Germany - but regardless - you need a reasonable soruce for that). Icewhiz (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: April 2019
This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 4 • April 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue |
DYK nomination of Moral progress
Hello! Your submission of Moral progress at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 08:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
"Mykola Semena"
- Piotrus, I've copyedited your "Mykola Semena" article.
- Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I've inadvertently distorted anything in the text.
- Best of luck!
- Nihil novi (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from Simeon (email client), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Pavlor (talk) 09:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Rozmowy ze Stanisławem Lemem
On 29 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rozmowy ze Stanisławem Lemem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a book-length interview with Stanisław Lem was subject to cuts due to censorship in Communist Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rozmowy ze Stanisławem Lemem. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rozmowy ze Stanisławem Lemem), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Category:Government officials by nationality has been nominated for discussion
Category:Government officials by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Jakub Różalski
Hello! Your submission of Jakub Różalski at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/International Day Against DRM at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 May newsletter
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:
- Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
- Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
- Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
- Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.
Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, Ceranthor, Lee Vilenski, and Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.
So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Maria Roszak
On 3 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria Roszak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Polish nun and supercentenarian Maria Roszak was named a Righteous Among the Nations for helping shelter Jewish refugees during the Holocaust? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Roszak. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maria Roszak), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Mongol invasion of Lithuania
On 4 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mongol invasion of Lithuania, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mongol invasion was likely the most devastating event for 13th-century Lithuania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mongol invasion of Lithuania. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mongol invasion of Lithuania), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, This Article that I Recently added Sources but it merely meets per WP:Notability (People)
Thanks!
Telex80 (talk) 04:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Jakub Różalski
On 8 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jakub Różalski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the mecha dieselpunk art of Polish painter Jakub Różalski has inspired a board game, a video game, a short film, and a book anthology? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jakub Różalski. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jakub Różalski), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Serfs has been nominated for discussion
Category:Serfs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 06:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Mykola Semena
On 10 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mykola Semena, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ukrainian journalist Mykola Semena was found guilty of separatism by Russian courts for his coverage of the annexation of Crimea for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mykola Semena. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mykola Semena), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright of pre-1994 Polish photographs
Hi, Piotrus. Am I mistaken, or do {{PD-Polish}} and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland#Retroactive changes contradict each other? Specifically,
[A]ll photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed to be in the public domain in Poland.
vs
*[T]he retroactive Polish Copyright Law of February 4, 1994, Article 124, put all those images back under copyright protection for 50 years since the death of the author.
- An amendment passed in late 2002, effective January 1, 2003, retroactively extended terms to 70 years after the death of an author.
I posted this question at c:Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Pre-1994_Polish_photographs.
-- Rrburke (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Needle in a haystack?
I am highly doubtful that anyone can help me with this, but wondered if you might have suggestions. While writing the article on the Inter-Allied Women's Conference of 1919, I found a photograph which identifies one of the conference participants was Eva Mitzhouma of Poland. The name does not remotely seem Polish to me and numerous searches (Micjoma, Mitjoma, Mitthomma, Mitzuma, etc.) give no result. It would seem to me that, as the women invited to attend this conference were prominent suffragettes, that she would be easy to find. But, without a name??? In the photo, on the article page, she's the last woman on the right on the top row. Any ideas of who this might be or what an actual Polish equivalent for the name might be? SusunW (talk) 19:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Jew with a coin
RE - this - If you are rolling back stuff - please don't do this on a blanket revert basis - e.g. you reverted the Polish language equivalent of Lucky Jew (Polish: Żyd na szczęście"),[2]
+ referencing changes/improvements in the lead. I think I probably agree with you on the POV of the lede (that it bears mentioning both offensive perception and non-offensive perception - sources do (though they tend to break out on ethnic lines - not sure I'm brave enough)). In any event - whichever version of the lede - Polish: Żyd na szczęście" should be there. Icewhiz (talk) 13:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- You made a mess with the "Accompanying proverbs" section. For starters everything that was added inmthe lede was already in the body - so now we have this twice. We do need to mention in the lead withnhas a proverb with it (maybe more briefly). Also you moved a sentence on history which probably should remain in the lede.Icewhiz (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Moral progress
On 25 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Moral progress, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a classic example of moral progress is the abolition of slavery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Moral progress. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Moral progress), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Poniżej dna
Przżyłem Stalina, to przezyję Icewhiz i Piotrusia. Xx236 (talk) 05:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: May 2019
Elżbeta Kossecka
dzięki za "cu" i opiekę:)--Kerim44 (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
Nomination of List of organizations in the Honorverse for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of organizations in the Honorverse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of organizations in the Honorverse (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 21:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
artykuł na en.wiki
Witam. Przed kilku laty napisałem na pl.wiki artykuł https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad%C5%BAapajoga . Kilka miesięcy temu zacząłem tłumaczyć go angielski i wczoraj uznałem, że można go już opublikować na en.wiki. Dzisiaj dostałem info, że artykuł został tu przeniesiony https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Ajapa_Yoga i czeka na weryfikację. Na pl.wiki nie ma problemu z publikacją moich artykułów, ale na en.wiki chyba jest bo jest to mój pierwszy artykuł tam. Z tego co tam piszą, to na publikację artykułu muszę poczekać nawet do 2 miesięcy. Chcę ciebie poprosić o weryfikację artykułu i przeniesienie go z draftu do głównej przestrzeni en.wiki. Pozdrawiam i z góry dziękuję za pomoc.--Gurubhay (talk) 07:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ponieważ nie wiem, czy jak napisze w Drafcie, to będziesz widział mój wpis, to więc kopię tego piszę tutaj. Dziękuję za twoją odpowiedź. Wychodząc na przeciw twojej prośbie w sekcji 'European and North America countries wstawiłem dwa źródła, które dokładnie odnoszą się do poprzedzających je zdań. Kilka słów wyjaśnienia: Ajapa Joga do tego roku była nauką dość hermetyczną i trudno jest znaleźć materiały źródłowe do artykułu. W tym roku ta nauka otwiera się na świat i w Polsce, Norwegi-Oslo, Niemczech-Berlin, Węgry-Miszkolc-Budapeszt-Balatonfured, Słowacja-Bratysława, Austria-Wiedeń, Czechy-Praga odbędzie się cykl wykładów o Ajapa Yoga. Dlatego przetłumaczyłem ten artykuł i zależy mi na w miarę szybkim upublicznieniu go. Pisząc artykuł na Polskiej wiki, kontaktowałem się z obecną Czeska Akademią Nauk, ale po transformacji i podziale Czechosłowacji dużo archiwalnych materiałów im poginęło i nie można już ich odtworzyć. Wówczas (około 10 lat temu) gdy pisałem artykuł czerpałem z wiedzy osób (dziś już nieżyjących), które uczestniczyły w tych wydarzeniach. Myślę, że wkrótce ta cała wiedza o początkach Ajapa Yogi na Zachodzie zostanie zapomniana. Nie żyjący już Czech, Vaclav Musil, uczestnik wykładów Guru Janardana w Pradze opisał mi w liście kto był osobą zapraszającą Guru Janardana na wykłady do Pragi. Był to Mr. Sejn, uczestnik sympozjum biologicznego, które odbywało się w tym samym czasie co otwarcie Indian Institute of Spiritual Science. Po przyjeździe do Czechosłowacji Guru Janardan mieszkał u dyrektora szpitala psychiatrycznego w Pradze. Piszę to wszystko, aby powiedzieć tobie, że mam te informacje, ale nie mogę ich umieścić, ponieważ nie ma do nich źródeł. Szkoda, bo zostaną zapomniane. Pozdrawiam--Gurubhay (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Could you please advise?
When editing while using both an alphabet list (e.g. Latin, Greek, Cyrillic...) and the "insert" list (long and short hyphens...), I am irritated at having to be switching back and forth between the two symbol lists. I would like the "insert" list (or at least the two hyphen variants) to be included as a regular, integral part of each alphabet list.
I don't know where this proposal should be submitted. Could you please:
1. tell me where to do it; or
2. submit it for me; or
3. if you agree with the idea, submit it under your own name?
Thanks!
Nihil novi (talk) 13:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
List of Kresy born Poles - declined
Hello Piotruś, may I presume on your precious time again? Having had a go at improving the Kresy article, I decided, stupidly as it turns out, to transfer the list of notable people, too long in my opinion, onto a separate page, with a redirect tag. Then I found it transferred into a draft space: Draft:List of Kresy born Poles, tagless for want of any sources. It had none to start with. So I spent hours finding 46 credible references and obeyed the instruction to submit it for review. Although it was dealt with quickly, it has been declined! So now, as suggested, I have left a background note in the Tea House. I am rapidly losing the will ... Can you suggest what to do please? Was I barking up the wrong tree again? Best wishes, --Po Mieczu (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Reason prevailed. Thank you, as ever. --Po Mieczu (talk) 10:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Dunajec...
- Thanks for pinging me about the Dunajec geological entity at Commons.
- While I was researching the question, I lost your ping.
- Commons has a page under "Dunajec Canyon".
- Wikipedia has one under "Dunajec River Gorge".
- Since the geological entity takes its name from that of the river, I would retain "river" in its name.
- I incline toward "gorge", and anyway that is what appears in the Wikipedia name, rather than "canyon".
- So, finally, I would call it the "Dunajec River Gorge" in the Commons, as it is in Wikipedia.
- Please let me know if you have any questions about the above—and, also, how the decision turned out.
- Thanks!
- Nihil novi (talk) 22:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
YOU HAVE BEEN WORKING GREAT Hanan hameed kaliyil (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC) |
Notice of arbitration
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 23, 2019, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, – bradv🍁 15:08, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
DYK for International Day Against DRM
On 10 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article International Day Against DRM, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the International Day Against DRM, organized by the Defective by Design initiative, has been observed since 2006? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/International Day Against DRM. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, International Day Against DRM), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Piotr Blass 1977.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Name of new article pl:Najświętsza Maryja Panna Królowa Polski
Hi Piotrus, I have question to you.
Currently I consider creating (actually preparing in sandbox and maybe later put to mainspace or draft) of new article linked above but I do not know what translation would be right into English. Currently we have articles on English Wikipedia like: Church of the Holy Virgin Mary The Queen of Poland, Słubice, Our Lady of Czestochowa Parish, Boston. What name you would chose for pl:Najświętsza Maryja Panna Królowa Polski? It should be based on reliabe sources for translation or analogy to other similar titles? Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 19:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Dawid2009: Redirects will do the trick in the end. I'd suggest checking what's the most common name used in Google Books and such. Also ping User:Nihil novi, who always has valuable thoughts on Polish to English naming issues. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:43, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Dawid2009: I haven't researched prior English renderings. If something more convincing is not found, I would suggest "The Virgin Mary, Queen of Poland". "Panna" is rendered unequivocally, in this context, by "Virgin". If one wants to be very complete (as well as redundant and longish), one could go with "The Most Holy Virgin Mary, Queen of Poland".
- Best, Nihil novi (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Jakub Wędrowycz
On 12 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jakub Wędrowycz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the fictional character Jakub Wędrowycz—an exorcist, drunkard, moonshine producer, and poacher—is one of the icons of Polish pop culture? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jakub Wędrowycz. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jakub Wędrowycz), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
Message added 09:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Massacre in Ciepielów, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encyklopedia PWN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
DYK for The Expanding Circle
On 14 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Expanding Circle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the book The Expanding Circle bridged sociobiology and ethics, discussing how humans have used reason to expand their moral considerations from family and tribe to the entire of society? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Expanding Circle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Podziwiam pański dorobek w ramach Wikipedii. Serdeczne pozdrowienia, Elżbieta Kossecka (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Lowkey tho
Piotrus: your paper isn't open access. How can I read it? Please ping response. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
Message added 10:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus again; I finally found littly time and created first version of the new article. This is currently wrote in tragic style and probably not quite understandable language but purly translated from version on Polish Wikipedia. Do you have time to help with copuyediting this page? This still require reworking and it also require adding technical things (sources, references, checking links, translation or few Polish sentences etc.). I would be thankfull if you could find littly time. Best wishes. Dawid2009 (talk) 07:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- For copyediting, I'll ping User:Nihil novi, our resident expert in English prose on Polish topics. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Peninsular Land, Transportation and Manufacturing Company
Isn't there some ferry or former ferry route that the Peninsular Land, Transportation and Manufacturing Company article can be redirected to? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 19:17, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- @DanTD: I don't see anything relevant in Category:Water transportation in Florida. :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- You mean, you don't see "Among its powers was the right to open and operate a line of steamboats on the waters of the St. Johns river, the Withlacoochee River and the Ocklawaha River, and on the several canals of the State?" I know it's not much, but it seems obvious that this article is supposed to be relevant to water transportation. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, I found something from Google Books. It looks like a lawsuit involving the Jacksonville, Tampa and Key West Railroad. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @DanTD: I am fine with redirect there (soft deletion). I am unsure if merger of unreferenced content is justified, through it is non-controversial, so if you want to copy it there and tag with cite needed, it's ok by me. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:50, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- I could do that. But I also found another. I also found out that one of the co-founders was a railroad and newspaper tycoon responsible for the founding of Tavares, Florida, and another was involved in the Tavares, Orlando and Atlantic Railroad. The way it's described, it either sounds like a dummy company, or a real one that never got off the ground. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 12:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @DanTD: I am fine with redirect there (soft deletion). I am unsure if merger of unreferenced content is justified, through it is non-controversial, so if you want to copy it there and tag with cite needed, it's ok by me. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:50, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, I found something from Google Books. It looks like a lawsuit involving the Jacksonville, Tampa and Key West Railroad. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- You mean, you don't see "Among its powers was the right to open and operate a line of steamboats on the waters of the St. Johns river, the Withlacoochee River and the Ocklawaha River, and on the several canals of the State?" I know it's not much, but it seems obvious that this article is supposed to be relevant to water transportation. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Evidence
I had meant to ping you from the evidence page since I mentioned you here: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland/Evidence#Removing unsuitable sources has been challenging. I realised that I'd not done so I'm letting you know. Apologies for the oversight. --K.e.coffman (talk) 15:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Association of Telehealth Service Providers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association of Telehealth Service Providers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Telehealth Service Providers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Senator2029 “Talk” 16:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Finished Wikipedia Assignment
Hello, I am Siyoung In in your Sociology of Everyday life class, and I finished my Wikipedia assignment. Thank you. Siyoung In (talk) 08:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am Jeong Seo Yoon in your Collective Intelligence class. I finally finished my Wikipedia assignment about Sangmo. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sangmo%7C I also did the Korean version of it. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%83%81%EB%AA%A8 And this is a link to the tomb of Goguryeo that you would like to refer to in the next lesson. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B3%A0%EA%B5%AC%EB%A0%A4%EC%9D%98_%EA%B3%A0%EB%B6%84 It was a pleasant semester for me. because I could learn many wonderful things. Have a great day! Thank you. --Jeong Seo Yoon (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- And a hefty COPYVIO, too. I cleaned it up. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:47, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 14
Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.
There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:
- A bunch of language support issues in particular, plus some other release blockers, such as the fact that currently there's no good way to find any hubs people do create.
- We also probably need some proper documentation and examples up to even reference if we want a meaningful discussion. We have the extension documentation and some test projects, but we probably need a bit more. Also I need to be able to even find the test projects! How can I possibly write reports about this stuff if I can't find any of it?!
Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:
- Midpoint report is out for this round of the project, if you want to read in too much detail about all the problems I've been running into.
- WikiProject Molecular Biology have successfully set up using the old module system that CollaborationKit is intended to replace (eventually), and it even seems to work, so go them. Based on the issues they ran into, it looks like the members signup thing on that system has some of the same problems as we've been unable to resolve in CK, though, which is... interesting. (Need to change the content model to the right thing for the formwizard config to take. Ugh, content models.)
Until next time,
-— Isarra ༆ 21:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation
Hello! Your submission of Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Grabowski
Piotrus, you know that Grabowski's claims are controversial, so why are you presenting them in a way that suggest that the 200,000 number is undisputed. Here are just a couple example of this: Historian Shimon Redlich writing about the book in Slavic Review, criticized the book's structure, in particular the lengthy quotations and appendix, the careless "claim of 'hundreds of thousands' of Jews seeking shelter among the Polish populace", which according to Redlich cannot be extrapolated to the whole country based on one single area. or Historian Krystyna Samsonowska of the Jagiellonian University wrote in her review that Grabowski did not use all available sources, and "gave up" on actual field research; for example, by not trying to contact the families of Jewish survivors from Dąbrowa Tarnowska, or the Poles who hid them. Samsonowska argues that, by using broader resources, she could identify 90 Jews who had survived the war in hiding in Dąbrowa County, as opposed to the 38 cited by Grabowski. --E-960 (talk) 07:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- If anything I would, remove the direct reference to Grabowski, and re-write the section in a general voice and note the wider debate about Polish involvement and ongoing debate about the numbers. --E-960 (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- @E-960: If you want to edit such articles and discuss such issues you may want to exercise caution. See ongoing Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Says- Passengers – Information about the number of passengers, fatalities, injuries and survivors. Information on the nationalities involved should be included. Optionally, notable passengers may be recorded but should be limited to individuals with a Wikipedia article. Information including ethnic or religious backgrounds and school affiliations should not be included.
That is the policy for all accident articles....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @WilliamJE: Right, but in the end it's just an essay. We are not required to follow it if there are arguments against it, and as I said, given the controversy surrounding this, such as that one of the passengers might have been a spy or such, a full list of passengers should be present. Again, I suggest we discuss it on the article's talk if you think it is really a significant issue. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is policy on all the accident pages here. Has been for a long time. Similar removals have been made at SwissAir 111, American Airlines 191, Pakistan International that crashed in 1965, etc etc. You take it to the WP talk page[9] since you are the editor who wants to ignore something....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- A WikiProject essay is not a binding rule. Thank you for bringing it as a suggestion to me. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is policy on all the accident pages here. Has been for a long time. Similar removals have been made at SwissAir 111, American Airlines 191, Pakistan International that crashed in 1965, etc etc. You take it to the WP talk page[9] since you are the editor who wants to ignore something....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Maria Grzegorzewska
I have been working on an article on Józefa Joteyko which took me to the stub on Maria Grzegorzewska, clearly in need of work and the only ref link is dead. At any rate, searching for materials, I find tons, so am probably going to make her my next "victim" :), but was surprised we have no photos of her at all, only sculptures and a grave marker. Found this and this, but cannot figure out where they might have come from, making it impossible to determine first publication. Then I found this (images on pages 20 and 28), which indicate they were taken from this book. I don't have access to the book, but if indeed they were published in 1972 without a copyright notice, they would be usable. this also has images, but I don't understand the abbreviations used and cannot tell if they were published. Can you possibly help me prove their publication or steer me in a direction to find a repository? Thanks! SusunW (talk) 23:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- @SusunW: My browser crashed in the middle of my reply. Yes,1972 book will qualify for commons:template:PD-Polish. As for the latter PDF, I am guessing that APAN refers to the archive of the Polish Academies of Sciences which would be abbreviated APAN ([10]). According to [11] in 1997 PAN received a donation of materials from the (presumably, last will of) Janina Doroszewska , a coworker of MG who died that year, and the documents donated included some content about MG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! I thought I was on the right track, but just wanted to make sure. The article is coming along nicely. Appreciate your help and the docs on Dorszewska. So many fascinating Polish women who have yet to be written in English. SusunW (talk) 04:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
The June 2019 Signpost is out!
- Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising
- In the media: The disinformation age
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters
- Technology report: Actors and Bots
- Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?
- Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia
- From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal
- Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes
WikiCup 2019 July newsletter
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
- Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
- Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
- SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
- Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics
Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
hi Piotrus, great to see you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zofia Leśniowska, i was tempted to ping you about it as a wikiexpert on Polish articles who hangs out at afd but didnt want any possible canvassing allegations confusing things.
Coolabahapple (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Coolabahapple, WP:CANVASS is the dumbed policy we have. Thx for the kitten, don't hesitate to ask me at any point if you want input on Poland-related topics.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: June 2019
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Editing News #1—July 2019
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Did you know?
Welcome back to the Editing newsletter.
Since the last newsletter, the team has released two new features for the mobile visual editor and has started developing three more. All of this work is part of the team's goal to make editing on mobile web simpler.
Before talking about the team's recent releases, we have a question for you:
Are you willing to try a new way to add and change links?
If you are interested, we would value your input! You can try this new link tool in the mobile visual editor on a separate wiki.
Follow these instructions and share your experience:
Recent releases
The mobile visual editor is a simpler editing tool, for smartphones and tablets using the mobile site. The Editing team has recently launched two new features to improve the mobile visual editor:
- Section editing
- The purpose is to help contributors focus on their edits.
- The team studied this with an A/B test. This test showed that contributors who could use section editing were 1% more likely to publish the edits they started than people with only full-page editing.
- Loading overlay
- The purpose is to smooth the transition between reading and editing.
Section editing and the new loading overlay are now available to everyone using the mobile visual editor.
New and active projects
This is a list of our most active projects. Watch these pages to learn about project updates and to share your input on new designs, prototypes and research findings.
- Edit cards: This is a clearer way to add and edit links, citations, images, templates, etc. in articles. You can try this feature now. Go here to see how: 📲Try Edit Cards.
- Mobile toolbar refresh: This project will learn if contributors are more successful when the editing tools are easier to recognize.
- Mobile visual editor availability: This A/B test asks: Are newer contributors more successful if they use the mobile visual editor? We are collaborating with 20 Wikipedias to answer this question.
- Usability improvements: This project will make the mobile visual editor easier to use. The goal is to let contributors stay focused on editing and to feel more confident in the editing tools.
Looking ahead
- Wikimania: Several members of the Editing Team will be attending Wikimania in August 2019. They will lead a session about mobile editing in the Community Growth space. Talk to them about how editing can be improved.
- Talk Pages: In the coming months, the Editing Team will begin improving talk pages and communication on the wikis.
Learning more
The VisualEditor on mobile is a good place to learn more about the projects we are working on. The team wants to talk with you about anything related to editing. If you have something to say or ask, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.
PPelberg (WMF) (talk) and Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Samuel Adalberg
On 25 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Samuel Adalberg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Samuel Adalberg, pioneer of Polish paremiology, committed suicide upon learning of the Germans' plans to construct the Warsaw Ghetto? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Samuel Adalberg. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Samuel Adalberg), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: July 2019
Categorisation
Hi just a quick reminder, unless I am very much mistaken you should not be adding categories that do not exist yet to articles as per MOS:CATORDER which states "An article should never be left with a non-existent (redlinked) category on it. Either the category should be created, or else the link should be removed or changed to a category that does exist." which is why I reverted your edit. Cheers --Dom from Paris (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2019
- In the media: Politics starts getting rough
- Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban
- Arbitration report: A month of reintegration
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?
- News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way
- Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect
- Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract
- Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things
DYK for Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation
On 3 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation investigates both Nazi crimes and communist crimes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Andrzej Marecki
Hello! Your submission of Andrzej Marecki at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:45, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Karski's reports
On 11 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karski's reports, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Karski's reports were the first comprehensive documents on the Holocaust in Poland to reach the government-in-exile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karski's reports. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karski's reports), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Andrzej Marecki
On 15 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andrzej Marecki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Polish colonel Andrzej Marecki was one of the victims of the controversial 1943 Gibraltar B-24 crash? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andrzej Marecki. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Andrzej Marecki), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:500s works
A tag has been placed on Category:500s works requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 18:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Following me around
As you did (newly created or not edited previous by you, nor linked at the time of your edit) - here, here, and here today. Please stop. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Following your comment - diff, I took a look at your contributions today - 18 August. You edited (from 11:11 through 12:34):
- New Polish School of Holocaust Scholarship (conference) - article I created, which you edited previously.
- Template:Did you know nominations/New Polish School of Holocaust Scholarship (conference) - newly created, unlinked anywhere other than the DYK queue. Note you are also involved in the article and shouldn't be a reviewer (you can make comments, but you are not an un-inonvolved reviewer).
- Ełk riots - created by me today.
- LGBT-free zone - an article I created a few days ago. Your first edit today. You could say you got to this off a link (as it is linked now) or off of the ARBCOM case.
- Template:Did you know nominations/Jew with a coin - article I created, you previously commented extensively - so not new. You are involved, however I am happy we've resolved differences there.
- The Holocaust in Poland - an article on both our watchlists, I'm sure. We're both editing it - fine.
- Judenfrei - an article you never edited previously.
- Collaboration in Poland - unrelated to me.
- So out of 8 articles/templates you've touched today so far (leading to my comment above - when this reached 3 and included an incorrect use of WP:MINOR) - 2 have little relation, 2 are articles previously created by me that you edited previously, and 4 are new creations/edits by me on topics that you haven't previously edited. User:AlexNewArtBot/PolandSearchResult include quite a few new articles unrelated to me. I don't mind interacting with you - but there is a certain threshold that is reasonable - and the above is beyond mere chance. Icewhiz (talk) 12:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Jan Gralewski
On 21 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jan Gralewski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Polish philosopher and World War II resistance member Jan Gralewski likely died in the controversial 1943 Gibraltar B-24 crash? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jan Gralewski), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Backlog Banzai
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
polskie przysięgi wojskowe
Witaj
Jest w enwiki całe hasło Polish Army oaths (o czym wiesz na pewno doskonale, bo parę lat temu sam je kilkakrotnie edytowałeś), a w nim teksty przysiąg wojskowych w Polsce w różnych okresach historycznych (aczkolwiek bez źródeł), wraz z tłumaczeniami na angielski. Brakowało jednego ważnego, bo obowiązującego 36 lat tekstu wprowadzonego ustawą w 1952 roku. Dodałem go: Polish_Army_oaths#Polish_People's_Army_oath_(1952-1988), ale nie podejmuję się go przełożyć na angielski. Dlatego proszę Ciebie, byś to uzupełnił.
Dodatkowo zaopatrzyłem trzy teksty (z 1947, z 1952 i z 1992) w przypisy wskazujące linki do odpowiednich dzienników ustaw, żeby nie pozostawiać tego hasła kompletnie bez źródeł. Można to jeszcze uzupełnić, posiłkując się choćby polskimi Wikiźródłami, ale przyznam uczciwie, że o godzinie 3:20 nad ranem (czasu polskiego) już nie mam do tego siły...
Pozdrawiam Julo (talk) 01:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Dodałem jeszcze teksty z 1944, 1988 i 1989 oraz uźródłowiłem 1924/27, 1944 i 1988. Tłumaczeń nie robię (mam za słaby angielski), liczę na Twoją pomoc. Julo (talk) 09:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Territorial evolution of Poland - map - errors in Memel/Klaipeda region
Hello, The initial map of Poland's changing boundaries is wonderful. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/92/Territorial-changes-of-Poland-1635-2009-small.gif
There is one problem that I noticed, which is not directly related to Poland, but is still relevant and can be easily fixed.
this is the error in the depiction of the "Memelgebiet". This region is shown as part of Germany (Weimar and Nazi) through WW II, but in fact, it was Allied administered after the Versailles Treaty (1919) and was then taken over by Lithuania in 1923, see: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Klaip%C4%97da_Revolt Then, in April 1939, the area was "returned to the Reich" after a Diktat by Nazi Germany, see: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/1939_German_ultimatum_to_Lithuania Thus it remained during WW II, and in 1945, this area was annexed by the USSR along with the so-called "Kaliningrad Oblast". So the 1919, 1923, and 1939 maps (and any intermediate ones) should be edited to show this region accurately. Thanks you for your consideration. Jtelser (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Replied on poster's takk page. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:11, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
It's done. Please work your magic with names and links. Feel free to change anything you think will improve the article. SusunW (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- Looking for photos, I finally found a source for this one of Gralewski. According to the Polish Institute and Sikorski Museum it was created in 1945, thus it would seem that from that date, their materials were "public". Obviously the photographer, unknown, was Polish, but my question would be does this fall under 1) official documents, materials, signs and symbols (so it was never protected) or 2) photograph with unknown author whose copyright expired after 50 years per 1994 law, i.e. 1945+50=1995 so before URAA date of 1 January 1996 and in the PD in both Poland and the US? Obviously, if it is usable, we can use it on his article as well as on Iwańska's. SusunW (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @SusunW: I have trouble identifying the photo we are talking above on the pages above? In either case, please see commons:User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright through be aware that some copyright paranoics have challenged this before on occasion, through nobody ever helped to correct any perceived errors in text. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's the 3rd photo in the article and captioned "From the Archives of the Polish Institute and General Sikorski Museum in London, Archives Ref. No A.XII. 4/172 ..." I read your copyright page and now I am confused, even more. Obviously the passport photo was taken on or before 1943. Also, obviously it was put on public display in 1945, but that public display was in London, so is that analysis saying that 70 years applied even though Poland was not at that time part of the EU and the copyright expired in Poland before the 1996 URAA date? (I really do not like copyrights, they are almost purposely confusing). SusunW (talk) 13:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @SusunW: Here's my honest take on this, speaking again as someone who devoted several hours, at least, trying to parse those convoluted laws and wrote the linked guide: upload the image using the tags I suggest on that page (picture by Polish photographer <1943). Let some crazy copyright paranoics bent on enforcing laws nobody does outside Wikipedia challenge this at some point, if ever. IF this ever happens (low chance), let them waste time presenting some convoluted rationale why this wouldn't be in the public domain. We have better things to do :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- As you see, I am cautious (read: not typically very bold) ;), but I have followed your advice and uploaded the image. Almost as soon as I uploaded it PawełMM cropped out the passport logos. I kind of liked them being in it for Gralewski's article, but I used the cropped one in Iwańska's. If you want to change the image, it's fine with me. Just glad to have found it and appreciate your help working through its copyright status. SusunW (talk) 05:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @SusunW: Here's my honest take on this, speaking again as someone who devoted several hours, at least, trying to parse those convoluted laws and wrote the linked guide: upload the image using the tags I suggest on that page (picture by Polish photographer <1943). Let some crazy copyright paranoics bent on enforcing laws nobody does outside Wikipedia challenge this at some point, if ever. IF this ever happens (low chance), let them waste time presenting some convoluted rationale why this wouldn't be in the public domain. We have better things to do :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's the 3rd photo in the article and captioned "From the Archives of the Polish Institute and General Sikorski Museum in London, Archives Ref. No A.XII. 4/172 ..." I read your copyright page and now I am confused, even more. Obviously the passport photo was taken on or before 1943. Also, obviously it was put on public display in 1945, but that public display was in London, so is that analysis saying that 70 years applied even though Poland was not at that time part of the EU and the copyright expired in Poland before the 1996 URAA date? (I really do not like copyrights, they are almost purposely confusing). SusunW (talk) 13:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @SusunW: I have trouble identifying the photo we are talking above on the pages above? In either case, please see commons:User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright through be aware that some copyright paranoics have challenged this before on occasion, through nobody ever helped to correct any perceived errors in text. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Looking for photos, I finally found a source for this one of Gralewski. According to the Polish Institute and Sikorski Museum it was created in 1945, thus it would seem that from that date, their materials were "public". Obviously the photographer, unknown, was Polish, but my question would be does this fall under 1) official documents, materials, signs and symbols (so it was never protected) or 2) photograph with unknown author whose copyright expired after 50 years per 1994 law, i.e. 1945+50=1995 so before URAA date of 1 January 1996 and in the PD in both Poland and the US? Obviously, if it is usable, we can use it on his article as well as on Iwańska's. SusunW (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
- News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings
- In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff
- Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users
- Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes
- News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Octavian Saiu
Hello,
I received your message for proposed deletion of a page I created: Octavian_Saiu. Given the number of references on Google Scholar, as well as JSTOR, news, newspapers and general Google results, I believe Octavian Saiu meets the required criteria for notability. Saiu is recognised as the most important Romanian theatre critic and scholar of his generation. He is also one of the most significant cultural animators of the global theatrical scene, as chair and speaker at key events such as Sibiu International Theatre Festival, Edinburgh International Festival, Festival of Tokyo and many others. He has had a substantial impact outside academia in his academic capacity: through his books and multiple public talks, conferences and dialogues. If required, he may be presented as "public intelectual" and animator rather than "academic" or "theatre critic". Therefore, as requested, I have added new references regarding his rich activity in the Career section and various external links. Could you please advise on how to further improve the page? Also, I hope you agree that the proposed deletion template can now be removed.
Thank you very much, Allthedots (talk) 10:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment
I understand your dislike of others mentioning the "EEML". I wouldn't do so in your case myself, but I understand why some would. I again suggest you two resolve your issues privately - you're both reasonable people, and neither of you should hold a grudge or distrust towards the other. Cheers. François Robere (talk) 11:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Jew with a coin
On 3 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jew with a coin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in some Polish homes, an image of a Jew holding a coin (example pictured, left) hangs to the left of the doorway, and is customarily turned upside down on the Sabbath so that good fortune may fall upon the household? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jew with a coin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jew with a coin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Sorry
I re-added it. Dapi89 (talk) 22:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Alcohol-related crime
Content you added to the above article and also to Driving under the influence appears to have been copied from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa039, which is not released under a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. There may have been other material copied from that same journal article, but that's all the bot found. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: August 2019
DYK nomination of Massacre in Ciepielów
Hello! Your submission of Massacre in Ciepielów at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:BADFAITH" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:BADFAITH. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:BADFAITH redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
statistics question
In the course of watching various pages related to the ArbCom case, I noticed that neither the Poland article nor the Racism in Poland article had any links to government statistics on race. Do you or one of your talk-page stalkers know if Statistics Poland provides such stats? 🌿 SashiRolls t · c 11:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Replied on the talk page of the person asking the question. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Ciepielów massacre
On 8 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ciepielów massacre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the POW massacre in Ciepielów is the most infamous instance of the war crimes of the Wehrmacht committed during the invasion of Poland? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ciepielów massacre), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus. I have reverted some of your recent edits concerning the above referenced article, where you use the phrase "most infamous" repeatedly. Aside from being redundant, the phrase is subjective. While it may be attributable to the Institute for Remembrance and one Polish author (I can't tell, since I don't read Polish) it is both a superlative (which we try to avoid) and an opinion held out as fact. If we reduce the number of times this phrase is repeated (to address redundancy) and state that it is an opinion expressed by a specific source (rather than a universal fact), the article become more encyclopedic in nature. Gulbenk (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Tambourine Studios
I added a few bits of more information and references and on the controversy and lawsuits about translated from Swedish Wikipedia. I'm hoping that this improves the article somewhat.
Sebras (talk) 21:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Complete first step of assignment
1. Complete wiki training course
2. Enrolled class’s course --Wkdrmstj (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
About Wikipedia:Training/For students.
Hello, Professor. This is Sujin Park who is taking a class Special Seminar in Sociology: Sociology of the Future.
I completed Wikipedia:Training/For students. Could you check it?
Thank you. :) Genie.P (talk) 07:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Grób Baden-Powell
Baden-Powell grave. I'd like to expand this and bring it back to life. In the meantime, do you think you could translate this to Polish? --evrik (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC) I replied on my talk page ... --evrik (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Your nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Gordon Jr.
I believe your AfD is a serious violation of WP:BEFORE. Took a look at your edit activity. You PRODed one article [12] at 14:14. Then four minutes later took the article in question to AfD at 14:18, confidently stating "No hint of any impact, reception, influences, etc.". Again, four minutes later, you took yet another article WP: Articles for deletion/Matsuya (department store) to AfD at 14:22, which was rather quickly thrown out as an absolutely baseless nomination. Same with this one. You obviously didn't bother to test any of the fancy links your automated script offers, as a matter of routine WP:BEFORE.
Try for instance GScholar. I myself was pretty surprised that Google Scholar [13] offers peer reviewed articles on a figure from the Batman universe, for instance the International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior [14]. There are many more! Why don't you slow down a little bit. Your activity reminds me of why I left Wikipedia years ago. Too many frustrations. MrCleanOut (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- My critique is unreasonable, I made a mistake, you didn't. Details on the AfD. Apologies. MrCleanOut (talk) 23:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
About Wikipedia:Training/For students.
Hello professor, I'm Chanyoung Park.I'm student in 'Sociology of Globalization'. I completed Wikipedia:Training/For students.Could you check it for me? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isidorepcy1996 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Hey Professor,
I'm Eric de Jong. I'm taking both 'The Future of Sociology' and 'Sociology of Globalisation'.
I completed the Wikipedia: Training/For students. Hope everything went well.
Cheers!
--Epmdejong (talk) 12:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Article(Dissolve Inc.) nominated for deletion appeal
Hi Piotrus, I'm the author of this article. I'm also pretty new to all of this so sorry if I broke any rules. Not sure if this is the correct way to reply to the nomination for deletion discussion.
I created this separate article, This is a Generic Brand video. It's not so much an advertisement, as it is an indictment of cliches used by advertisers. It's an indirect commentary on formulaic pandering. The video was the first of a trilogy, which went on to mock generic presidential campaign ads as well as stereotypical ads targeting millennials.
It's actually quite brilliant making fun of ads in an ad. It's a double entendre! I discovered these in one of my lectures and felt like these videos deserved to be documented. It's like these troupes describe the socially accepted values during this select moment in time.
Anyway so this article is about the company behind these clever videos. Cool brand. Other company's have wiki articles, shouldn't this be acceptable?
15:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TylerDurden213 (talk • contribs)
DYK for Alicja Iwańska
On 20 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alicja Iwańska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Polish resistance member Alicja Iwańska became an academic and compared political, religious, and racial persecution in Europe to U.S. segregation restrictions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alicja Iwańska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alicja Iwańska), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Alcohol-related crime
Hello! Your submission of Alcohol-related crime at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:04, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I completed the training.
I am Seohyeon An in Sociology Special Seminar lecture. I completed the training and enrolled in our course. So I leave this message, but I do not know this is right page to write talk.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seohyeon An (talk • contribs) 02:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Regarding your notability concerns for Wallenstam
I removed your nomination for deletion, it's not surprising you don't know about Wallenstam, considering it's a mainly Gothenburg centered property owner. Just like I don't know any Polish property developers either. But as I wrote in my summary it's well known in several sectors in Sweden, partly as a landlord, partly as a large cap company. This isn't the first time someone have tried to delete the stub, it happened in 2016 as well. That being said, if you don't believe me, here are tons of news articles written about the company, courtesy of Google:
- Sveriges Television: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asvt.se+Wallenstam
- Sveriges Radio: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asr.se+Wallenstam
- Svenska Dagbladet: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asvd.se+Wallenstam
- Dagens Nyheter: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Adn.se+Wallenstam
- Dagens Industri: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Adi.se+Wallenstam
- Göteborgs-Posten: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Agp.se+Wallenstam
- Sydsvenskan: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asydsvenskan.se+Wallenstam
- Expressen: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aexpressen.se+Wallenstam
The list goes on, but I'm running out of newspapers that I can think of. Almost all articles are in Swedish, obviously. It's mainly about how the business is doing, new development projects, tenant controversies, court cases and the usual stuff.
With the current stock price the company is worth 34.5 billion SEK (US$3.5 billion, €3.2 billion) and despite being a primary source their website's about page paint an accurate picture about the size and scope of the company.
And if all that wasn't enough, the article on the Swedish language Wikipedia have been around since 2006 with absolutely no attempts at deletion for lack of notability. Really, if anyone would know if the company is notable or not it's the Swedes themselves.
// Former wikipedian 85.230.90.223 (talk) 03:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'll copy this to Talk:Wallenstam where we can discuss it further. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Dear Professor,
I'm Zhou Xuerong,a student of Special Seminar in Sociology: Sociology of the Future.I've already finished learning the Wikipedia:Training/For students.Waiting for your reply.Thank you!Zhouxuerong1 (talk) 07:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Student training session
Good evening :D I am jaeeun kim from your globalization class 2019. I completed the training session, it would be really nice of you to check my page :D Have a great day! Jaeeunkim96 (talk) 13:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Saw your comment on International Association of Theatre Critics at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octavian Saiu. It's a notable organization with it's own entry in The Oxford Encyclopedia of Theatre and Performance. I created a stub based on that entry. Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 04:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
I'm Dong IL Kim from sociology of globalization. i finished the training long time ago. haha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dongil0324 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear professor,
Hello professor, I'm Seonghan Lee from Information Sociology project. I have finished Wikipedia: Training for Students today. But i feel some difficulties about Wikipedia and Wikivoyage, so I will train those things steadily. Have a good night:^^
Speedy deletion nomination of International Affairs (journal)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on International Affairs (journal), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
ygm
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
I've copyedited through the first paragraph of the "Battle" section.
I couldn't make sense of the first sentence of the second paragraph.
I suggest you run through the article to clear up the text so that I can copyedit further with some understanding.
Thanks.
Nihil novi (talk) 10:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have completed copyediting the article.
- Please review it carefully, including the battle box, as editing and translating inevitably involve interpretation of the text.
- Thanks.
- Nihil novi (talk) 08:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Traing/for Students
I'm Bong Nyoung Heo from sociology of Globalization. 2019 I completed the Wikipedia Training for students today. Well, This took quiet a long time lol.--Bongnyoung (talk) 08:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Student training session
Hi :D I am Nasuin from your globalization class 2019. I completed the training session, it would be really nice of you to check my page :D Have a great day! Nasuin (talk) 15:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Emails
I'm actually sending an email after I post this message so there might be up to 5 minutes delay. (It's not long anyway) — regards, Revi 02:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Hello professor. I'm Jinsu Bae. I've completed Wiki Training. However, several sections have not been confirmed for completion due to errors. So I didn't get a mark. I asked this part. Nevertheless first, I leave a completion message here. Please excuse me for not being good at English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Memilria (talk • contribs) 06:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Dear professor,
I'm Youngmin Seo from Special seminar in Special Seminar in Sociology: Sociology of the Future. I finished the training just now! But I'm still confused.TT. I have to practice hard. I waiting for your apply. thank you! --Elin0914 (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC) @Piotrus:Is this the right way to do it?
DYK for Zambrów massacre
On 28 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zambrów massacre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the Zambrów massacre, during the September 1939 invasion of Poland, German Wehrmacht soldiers murdered more than 200 Polish prisoners of war? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zambrów massacre. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Zambrów massacre), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Polish article
If you need a QPQ for DYK, you could consider reviewing my nomination of Sergiusz Toll. The article is somewhat experimental for me because all the sources are in Polish and I do not speak the language. The article is based on the Polish language Wikipedia article but is more of a summary than a translation. Google Translate is very good, but it is possible for misunderstandings to slip in. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
wikipedia training for student
I practiced training. I will try more. -User:Ehddl2525/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehddl2525 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Training/For students
hi I'm Chaeyoung Kim from Special Seminar in Sociology, Information Sociology Project. I completed the Wikipedia Training for students.--Chaeyoung907 (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Dear professor, I'm WU YI CHEN from Special seminar in Special Seminar in Sociology: Sociology of the Future.I finished the trinning,but I don't know if I am doing the right thing. commet add by User:Jane2040 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jane2040 (talk • contribs) 10:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Dear professor, I'm LIAO HSIN YUN from Special seminar in Special Seminar in Sociology: Sociology of the Future. I finished the training, but I don't know if I am doing it right. comment added by User:Yolosi0514 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Dear professor, I'm TSAI I CHEN from Special seminar in Special Seminar in Sociology: Sociology of the Future. I finished the training. comment added by User:janejanetsai (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Dear professor, I'm KAO WEI CHUN from Special seminar in Special Seminar in Sociology: Sociology of the Future. I finished the training. comment added by User:APPLE WEI WEI (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
I am Jeongeun Kim from sociology of globalization, Special Seminar in Sociology, Information Sociology Project. I completed the Wikipedia Training for students. My nickname is J2dms09. This nickname is used on Wiki page and Wikivoyage page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J2dms09 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 15
A final update, for now:
The third grant-funded round of WikiProject X has been completed. Unfortunately, while this round has not resulted in a deployed product, I am not planning to resume working on the project for the foreseeable future. Please see the final report for more information.
Regards,
-— Isarra ༆ 19:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Student Training Session
Dear professor, I am Ji Young An and I am taking a course Special Seminar in Sociology.I am remaining a message to notify that I finished the student training. Thank you. An Ji Young (talk) 04:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
This Month in Education: September 2019
Your GA nomination of Battle of Hel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Hel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Alcohol-related crime
On 2 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alcohol-related crime, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that drunk driving is among the most common alcohol-related crimes in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alcohol-related crime. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alcohol-related crime), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Reply
Just FYI, I replied to the comment you made on Talk:National Council on Family Relations. IntoThinAir (talk) 19:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Poland
Thank you for inviting me to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, I have added my name to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Members list. Hopefully my contributions are valuable to this community. |
OLLSZCZ (talk) 16:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Polocaust
We need to get all the parties to calm down and focus on the academic publications of high quality. We should look for older, proven works, not cutting edge new ideas. My own understanding of events is that there were good Poles (resistance) and a few bad Poles (collaborators), as there are in all societies. There were Poles who were persecuted for resisting tyranny (political enemies). There were Poles who were persecuted for being Jewish, or Catholic, or gay. Surely many Holocaust victims were Polish citizens. We should avoid getting into the game called oppression Olympics. Jehochman Talk 17:23, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
PRODs
Instead of writing on every PROD nomination "ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.", why don't you keep a personal PROD log to track changes to the PRODed articles (which is easy to do via "Related changes")? Such a log will be get kept automatically if you use a tool like Twinkle. SD0001 (talk) 17:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Challenger, Gray & Christmas
Hi Piotrus, hope you don't mind that I de-PRODed your Challenger, Gray & Christmas nomination while monitoring the WikiProject Companies page. As someone who lives in British Columbia has heard of this HR recruitment and outplacement firm, I tended to think it's potentially notable. There seems to be enough online sources for at least a stub-class article, but if you want to submit an AfD process, I wouldn't be opposed to that. I think it just deserves a full debate. Hope you don't mind.
Speaking of which, I've started using Twinkle to do my AfDs...it's sooo much quicker! Especially for the deletion sorting lists notifications. ;)Doug Mehus (talk) 06:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Abdul Aminu Mahmud article
Hello Piotrus, thank you for your notice. The article is a work in progress and more links are added to the text provided. Considerable work should be done in the 24 hours or thereabout. Cheers! 2dmaxo (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Piotrus, kindly consider removing the proposed for deletion tag. Warm regards! 2dmaxo (talk) 10:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
NFICTION wikilink
Hi! On Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Futar you judged the article fails WP:NFICTION. As the nominator I agree the article should be deleted. I'm curious about the wikilink though.
I clicked on it, and it seems to be an essay about how there is no special notability guideline for fictional topics, all previous attempts to create one have failed, and that other notability guidelines (like the GNG) should be used instead. Are you aware of this? Was there a previous version of the page that you intended to reference? --causa sui (talk) 21:09, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 176.221.108.218 (talk) 08:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Help
Hello. Help copy edit and improve the article Akane Yamaguchi. Thanks you very much. 14.162.146.38 (talk) 02:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Dear anon, what on earth makes you think I'd be interested in a sports biography? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Edit warring at Reliability of Wikipedia
Please drop your edit war using bogus Wikipedia policy arguments, as you did here. Banana Republic (talk) 14:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Editing News #2 – Mobile editing and talk pages – October 2019
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Inside this newsletter, the Editing team talks about their work on the mobile visual editor, on the new talk pages project, and at Wikimania 2019.
Help
What talk page interactions do you remember? Is it a story about how someone helped you to learn something new? Is it a story about how someone helped you get involved in a group? Something else? Whatever your story is, we want to hear it!
Please tell us a story about how you used a talk page. Please share a link to a memorable discussion, or describe it on the talk page for this project. The team would value your examples. These examples will help everyone develop a shared understanding of what this project should support and encourage.
Talk Pages
The Talk Pages Consultation was a global consultation to define better tools for wiki communication. From February through June 2019, more than 500 volunteers on 20 wikis, across 15 languages and multiple projects, came together with members of the Foundation to create a product direction for a set of discussion tools. The Phase 2 Report of the Talk Page Consultation was published in August. It summarizes the product direction the team has started to work on, which you can read more about here: Talk Page Project project page.
The team needs and wants your help at this early stage. They are starting to develop the first idea. Please add your name to the "Getting involved" section of the project page, if you would like to hear about opportunities to participate.
Mobile visual editor
The Editing team is trying to make it simpler to edit on mobile devices. The team is changing the visual editor on mobile. If you have something to say about editing on a mobile device, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.
- On 3 September, the Editing team released version 3 of Edit Cards. Anyone could use the new version in the mobile visual editor.
- There is an updated design on the Edit Card for adding and modifying links. There is also a new, combined workflow for editing a link's display text and target.
- Feedback: You can try the new Edit Cards by opening the mobile visual editor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Edit cards talk page.
- In September, the Editing team updated the mobile visual editor's editing toolbar. Anyone could see these changes in the mobile visual editor.
- One toolbar: All of the editing tools are located in one toolbar. Previously, the toolbar changed when you clicked on different things.
- New navigation: The buttons for moving forward and backward in the edit flow have changed.
- Seamless switching: an improved workflow for switching between the visual and wikitext modes.
- Feedback: You can try the refreshed toolbar by opening the mobile VisualEditor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Toolbar feedback talk page.
Wikimania
The Editing Team attended Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. They led a session on the mobile visual editor and a session on the new talk pages project. They tested two new features in the mobile visual editor with contributors. You can read more about what the team did and learned in the team's report on Wikimania 2019.
Looking ahead
- Talk Pages Project: The team is thinking about the first set of proposed changes. The team will be working with a few communities to pilot those changes. The best way to stay informed is by adding your username to the list on the project page: Getting involved.
- Testing the mobile visual editor as the default: The Editing team plans to post results before the end of the calendar year. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: VisualEditor as mobile default project page.
- Measuring the impact of Edit Cards: The Editing team hopes to share results in November. This study asks whether the project helped editors add links and citations. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: Edit Cards project page.
– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Professor Piotrus. Thanks in advance.
Dear Professor,
My name is MIN KYEONG SHIN who is taking a class 'Globalization'. It is a little bit tricky to me to understand. But the contents of class are really interesting. I would like to learn more about the globalization. I wish you always have a good time in Korea. Thanks a lot professor! Sincerely.--SHIN MIN KYEONG (talk) 05:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Training for Students
Dear professor,
I'm Jaehyeon Seo in 'Golbalization'. I finished Wikipedia training, but I couldn't write on the talk page because it was too difficult. I'm sorry for late. --OrinaldaJH (talk) 05:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Daniel Blatman
Hello, Piotrus,
Thank you for creating Daniel Blatman.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
As in some in depth ones.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Slatersteven (talk) 09:23, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
[15] — Preceding unsigned comment added by JolantaAJ (talk • contribs) 13:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- This one has been speedy closed.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of en:Z-mill
Dear Piotrus, thank you for your message about the proposed deletion. I have removed the deletion request for the following reasons: The Z-mill is definitely not a hoax. It is a very important machine used in steel production. But the critics on the English version of this articel is largely right. I have tried to add some information and to remove a couple of sentence. There is still more to do. You may also have a look to the German version of this article de:Sendzimir-Gerüst, which I think is more neutral.
Regards -- Dr. George 08:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xorx (talk • contribs)
DYK for Józefa Joteyko
On 23 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Józefa Joteyko, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Józefa Joteyko believed that wages should be based upon scientific research and the amount of effort required to do a job, rather than arbitrary factors like gender? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Józefa Joteyko. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Józefa Joteyko), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: October 2019
DYK for Pelin Ünker
On 28 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pelin Ünker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Turkish correspondent Pelin Ünker is the only journalist in the world sentenced for writing about the Paradise Papers investigation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pelin Ünker. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pelin Ünker), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Mobile infantry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobile infantry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile infantry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations!!
Happy Birthday Piotrus! Have a blast!!! 2dmaxo (talk) 09:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, hope this meets you well?
I have these tags on the above page:
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Could help me check the page and advise next steps as I intend to remove them? Cheers! 2dmaxo (talk) 09:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Icewhiz
I reverted your report for procedural reasons. However, acknowledging that this redirect is causing nothing but problems for editors who want to allege socking by Icewhiz, I have deleted the redirect. That means you should be able to file your report again naming Icewhiz as the master. Let me know if you have any problems. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
DYK for Ulf Himmelstrand
On 1 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ulf Himmelstrand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Swedish sociologist Ulf Himmelstrand has been called the "father of sociology in Nigeria"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ulf Himmelstrand. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ulf Himmelstrand), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:
- Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
- Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
- Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
- SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
- Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
- Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
- HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points
All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
- Casliber (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 7 FAs during the course of the competition.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 14 GAs in round 5.
- Yashthepunisher (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 4 FLs overall.
- Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 91 FPs overall.
- MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 7 articles in good topics in round 2.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 14 did you know articles in round 5.
- Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 7 in the news articles in round 1.
- Ed! (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 56 good article reviews in round 1.
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Reuben Hill
Hello! Your submission of Reuben Hill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- ^ Bencze, Larry; Alsop, Steve (2014). Activist Science and Technology Education. Springer. p. 311. ISBN 9400743602.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Tartakowsky
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).