User talk:Nelson Leach

Welcome!

Hello, Nelson Leach, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nelson Leach/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nelson Leach/sandbox

A tag has been placed on Nelson Leach/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pendomer (parish) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pendomer (parish). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it is poorly formatted. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Pendomer (village and historical parish). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware that I had introduced any links. Please be specific. Thank you. Nelson Leach (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Raikes

Please put external links in correctly. There's already a section, and the formatting is lacking. Drmies (talk) 17:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I did not see it. Nelson Leach (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draft space

The article you created has been moved by multiple editors to Draft:Edward Monro because it is not ready to be in the main space of the encyclopedia. Kindly STOP moving it back. You should use the WP:AFC process to submit it for review. Melcous (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to be rude. The processes are not obvious to a beginner. Nelson Leach (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What did I say that was rude? You did the same thing three times, I have asked you to stop and pointed to the correct process to use. Melcous (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know I was doing the same thing three times. I used to have a "submit for review" button but it is not there now so how do i submit it for review? Nelson Leach (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have done it. Thank you for your patience. Nelson Leach (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Monro (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoobThreePointOh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It seemed like this article was ready to get accepted... until I scrolled down and saw no sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Monro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nelson Leach! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pendomer (parish)

Hello, Nelson Leach. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pendomer (parish), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Monro has been accepted

Edward Monro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Nelson Leach (talk) 08:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pendomer (parish)

Hello, Nelson Leach. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pendomer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]