User talk:Moka Mo

Welcome!

Hello, Moka Mo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Toronto, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 17:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of metropolitan areas by population page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GDP figues for UK cities

I noticed your edits to several UK cities adding GDP figures (in US dollars rather than UK pounds). The basis of these figures is under discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#GDP in US dollars. Perhaps you could join in the discussion.— Rod ^talk 08:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan areas

You wrote on my talk page "However, all of my edits include the metropolitan area and if you visit the reference page, you can see that. I found that adding "metro" was unnessessary and that is why I removed your edit." It is not at all obvious to readers that your edits relate only to metropolitan areas, especially in an article such as London where area, population and economic statistics are provided for Greater London, Greater London Urban Area and London Metropolitan Area (loosely defined and quite possibly not defined in the same way as your figures) and carefully distinguished. I will restore the clarification. NebY (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Ownership of articles which describes Wikipedia policy and includes the clear statement "Once you have posted it to Wikipedia, you cannot stop anyone from editing text you have written. As each edit page clearly states: Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone. Your message on my talk page, "I am very ticked off that you think you have the authority to change my edit. I will give you one last chance, but don't cross the line" is in breach of that policy and suggests you do not understand how Wikipedia works. You added something to an article, I added something to that, and as time goes on, other editors will make other changes. NebY (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on London. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. -- Dr Greg talk 21:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Over the last week, you have made changes to a large number of Nova Scotia articles (claims that communities are now regions) without providing a source that supports the changes or even explaining why the changes are being made. Another editor noticed the changes as being incorrect and reverted your changes with an explaination. It appears that you have gone back and put your changes back in, and again have not provided a source or even an edit summary explaining what you are doing. You obviously believe your changes are correct but refusing to discuss or provide a source is not helping your case here. Please give other editors the same respect they gave you and explain your edits, providing a source and a brief explaination may seem trivial to you but it can go along way in preventing problems. There are now several editors who believe your changes to be incorrect, so I doubt they are going to let them remain without an effort on your part to show them to be correct changes. Cmr08 (talk) 22:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 10:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Rick and Morty (season 2) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick and Morty (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Bachelor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rickandmortyseason1.png.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rickandmortyseason1.png.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RickMortyseason1cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RickMortyseason1cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RickandMortyS1DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RickandMortyS1DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Toronto, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 02:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StanKyleCartmanKennySouthPark.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StanKyleCartmanKennySouthPark.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DarylDixonseason5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DarylDixonseason5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fargo (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Walsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's

Hi there, I notice you consistently use "it's" when it should be "its". I corrected it here for you, you incorrectly changed it again, and I had to fix it again. I've seen you to do this numerous times on articles where it had to fixed. Please take note of this error. Thanks. Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of breakout characters

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to List of breakout characters, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the American Jews page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reception POV

Hi Moka Mo, I do believe you want to help, but you have to stick to Wikipedia's guidelines on POV. Even if a video game is considered to be one of the best, that bit in the lead comes last, not in the middle. --Soetermans. T / C 15:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So adding "highly" is not content, and is not POV neutral. Let the reception speak for itself, try to avoid words like "highly", "universal", "overwhelming", etc. --Soetermans. T / C 10:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Console Sales, VGChartz

VGChartz is considered an unreliable source. Please do not use it for sales figures. -- ferret (talk) 23:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Half-Life (series) is not exactly "fixing a typo". Please be sure to provide an accurate summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --Soetermans. T / C 15:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. czar 23:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox One sales figures

Please do not update the sales figures for Xbox One with the Gamespot source you have been using. The source clearly notes that the figures are unofficial (Or even rumor) and could not be verified. -- ferret (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DarylDixonseason5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DarylDixonseason5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Legend of Zelda Twilight Princess GCN Cover Art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Legend of Zelda Twilight Princess GCN Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Gestrid (talk) 06:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gestrid (talk) 07:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nirvana performing at Pier 48, Seattle, MTV Live and Loud, 1993.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nirvana performing at Pier 48, Seattle, MTV Live and Loud, 1993.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 05:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Moka Mo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quebec City

Moka, another editor brought up a good point regarding your last edit, and I have course have offered my insight as well. Please feel free to join in on my talk page. Cheers! trackratte (talk) 02:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decades in centuries

Sorry I didn't get back to you with the details earlier. I think Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years/Archive 9#Last decade of century is the last discussion on whether we list the position of decades within centuries; the consensus being that we do not. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Halo 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 08:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Moka Mo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Johnny Au. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Toronto Raptors have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 01:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ConnorMcDavid2018.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also related to this image, I've removed it, and will have it deleted, because there is no applicable Non-free use criteria for it. While we appreciate the intention, "a more recent picture" is not a valid argument for the inclusion of a non-free image. Particularly since we already have images of the subject, and since we can get free, updated images fairly easily once the next NHL season starts. Thank you, Reso lute 13:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 NHL results

Thanks for updating the results of various NHL teams. However, please stop changing format of various teams' results tables as you did here (adding points next to month) and here (adding goaltender's record). Also please do not change the Recap link if it is already added (this is specifically done in the San Jose Sharks' pages). – Sabbatino (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding the points next to the name of the month. Look at previous seasons' pages of the teams to see what format should be used in the results' tables. In addition, seeing that you ignored all the messages (not only mine) on your talk page it is evident that you intend to be disruptive regarding this matter. Please stop it. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:31, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Moka Mo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottawa Senators, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andrew Hammond and Shane Bowers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to NHL teams

Your most recent changes to NHL teams regarding the color schemes and the addition of start/end templates have been reverted. That all has been discussed in the past so you need yo gain a consensus at WT:NHL if you want for your proposed format to be used. I also advise you to not re-insert your proposed format until this matter has been discussed, because you always tend to ignore what other users write to you, which leads to edit wars. – Sabbatino (talk) 07:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you are aware of why your changes were no good. They were changed away from a similar format to what you did awhile ago because that format doesn't meet accessibility standards. The current version meets accessibility requirements and were the result of a long consensus process. -DJSasso (talk) 13:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, this change to Edmonton Oilers and this change to the Nashville Predators both fail MOS:CONTRAST (as seen here and here). It also makes a smaller font on any red or green background problematic for color-blindness. Yosemiter (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page Manny Machado appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Manny Machado. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 04:46, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

trades

We do not add trades until they are official. We don't even know what Ottawa is getting from Columbus yet. Enigma^msg 17:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Aleksander Barkov Jr.. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. In addition, please read the WP:MOVE before trying to move a page. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Sabbatino. Your recent edit to the page Antti Niemi (ice hockey) appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Statistical leaders

Given some of your recent edits, are you able to provide any evidence of a time where the NHL listed a player ahead of another player who was tied with him in points that had fewer goals than the player he was tied in points with? We both know the answer to that question is no, so why are you trying to perpetuate something that is untrue? Deadman137 (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you were unable to answer my last question, why did you attempt to re-add incorrect information back into the 2019 Stanley Cup playoffs article that previously removed? You can let go of your slow moving edit war any time now. Deadman137 (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 NHL season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Fenton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cam Ward, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 14:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minnesota Wild, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Fenton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cale Fleury

The article Cale Fleury has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CataracticPlanets (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Ville Heinola

I reverted your edit to the page for Ville Heinola because players who were drafted in 2018, and were born in the year 2000, have already scored goals in the NHL last year. Ville Heinola was not the first player born in the 21st century to score a goal in the NHL. If you want you can instead add a line stating that he is the first player born in the year 2001 to score a goal in the NHL, if you can verify that no other player born in that year scored before him. TheSpoonKing (talk) 05:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yu Darvish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page Mike Moustakas appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same for the Renfroe-Pham rumors. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Stephen Strasburg. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for synthesis (and unsourced edits), as you did at Clint Capela. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 07:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sabbatino. Your recent edit appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Sabbatino (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Alex Verdugo. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kobe Bryant. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ryan O'Reilly (ice hockey) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Berube

Just out of curiosity, why do you have a problem with using Berube's chosen name, and not, say, P.K. Subban, T.J. Oshie, J.T. Miller, T.J. Tynan, J.T. Compher, A.J. Greer, C.J. Smith, T.J. Brennan, T.J. Brodie, etc. I can understand not applying the diminutive to players like Pierre-Olivier Joseph, Pierre-Edouard Bellemare, and Benoit-Olivier Groulx (who casually go by "P-O", "P-E", and "Bo", respectively), as those are transient nicknames and shortforms but they still formally go by their full name, or players like Marc-Andre Fleury, and Marc-Edouard Vlasic who elect to go by their full, double-barrel name (or by the single first name "Marc"); and I wouldn't use those shortened names, accordingly. But Berube elects to formally go by "J-F", and is even registered with the NHL as such. Just curious, is all! Thanks!–uncleben85 (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NHL transactions

Hello, I'm Sabbatino. Your recent edit to the page Wayne Simmonds appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jean-Gabriel Pageau, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Honolulu does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Please discuss on the talk page of any Hawaiʻi related article before attempting to remove ʻokinas. Peaceray (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have failed to have heeded the first two requests to start using edit summaries to explain your edits, so I don't expect adding yet another template will change your behaviour as you have not supplied a summary in your past 500 edits. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Stastny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Stone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NHL franchise leaders

Do not update franchise leaders as you did at Vegas Golden Knights. We wait until the season is over or cancelled and then update it. The COVID pandemic is not an exception, because the NHL did not say anything about the season being cancelled. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed at username change request

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

Before i revert, you have any official source that the season is over (at least for the Sharks)? So far, nothing official as far as i can see... Kante4 (talk) 19:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You did not understand what i said. You are updating stats when the season is still running and not cancelled. Kante4 (talk) 20:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which means it is not official and stats should not be updated until it is confirmed by the nhl. Plesase revert your additions. Kante4 (talk) 20:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the edits as explained above (season not over official). When it is made official by the NHL that they jump into the playoffs, then we can add those stats back. Kante4 (talk) 12:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Kante4 (talk) 15:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PEI in ice hockey personnel infoboxes

Do not remove the "PEI" abbreviation for "Prince Edward Island" in the infoboxes of ice hockey personnel. The province's name is too long in some instances and the abbreviation solves the problem. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Cup playoffs

I can appreciate that details surrounding the return to play for the NHL are changing quickly at times. So how are you going to justify your argument when the league declared that all games going forward for this season are considered playoff games? Is it possible to play a playoff game without first qualifying for the playoffs? The fact is that the league brought in a 24 team playoff for this season and until a normal season is completed we're going to have a few articles that are a little off as a result. Deadman137 (talk) 03:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The mere fact that you still haven't grasped the fact that 24 teams made the playoffs three months later, is getting old. If you make an edit like that again I will start templating you for disruptive editing. Deadman137 (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to ruffle your feathers. It is what it is Moka Mo (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 NHL Entry Draft

Just leave the article alone, you're making more issues than you're fixing. Deadman137 (talk) 02:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Moka Mo (talk) 02:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Draft

Teams are based off where they played at the end of 2019-20. Deadman137 (talk) 01:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes to team colors

Please do no change team colors or the order of team colors without explicitly citing a source, such as your edit here. The official media guides (which are used as the cited sources) are rather explicit in their order and any other order would be original research on your part. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 16:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hey, please add a source when a player re-signs or got traded. Kante4 (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jack Eichel. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Chris Paul. You can write unsourced that he is "traded" when breaking news based on anonymous sources, at best, only say they've agreed but not completed it yet. —Bagumba (talk) 01:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of current NHL captains & alternate captains

Howdy. The Blues have yet to announce O'Reilly as captain. We wait until it's official before we update the article. GoodDay (talk) 04:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, okay... Moka Mo (talk) 04:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Free agent" vs "Free Agent"

Do not change designations from "Free agent" to "Free Agent" in the infoboxes of players. Free agent is not some kind of job title and "agent" and is just a common noun. For example, you do not write "Player X became a Free Agent in December 2020", but instead you write "Player X became a free agent in December 2020". – Sabbatino (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NHL bios of alternate captains

Shouldn't we be phrasing it as "...an alternate captain of..." on those NHL bios? After all, each team always has at least 2 alternate captains. GoodDay (talk) 20:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Overlinking

Linking players teams in the caption is overlinking. These teams are already linked in the infobox and throughout the article.-- Yankees10 04:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keone Kela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nicknames

I removed nicknames from the Chris Paul lead per MOS:BADNICK. CP3 is the most common. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 06:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

medal tables on ice hockey players infobox

Hi, I've noticed you have been incorporating the medal table into ice hockey players' infobox. For future references, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey, it has been the practice to leave the medal table in the international play section, or international statistics section so as to not convolute the basic infobox..Thanks for your continued contributions Triggerbit (talk) 11:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image size

Please stop changing the image size in hockey player infoboxes, the standard for player images in the infobox is 230px per the template. We only use a different size if the quality of the image is so bad that it causes pixelation. -DJSasso (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pete Fairbanks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Norman Powell. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 17:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba: FYI: Just blocked 209.52.88.189 and 2001:569:fa39:de00::/64 as Moka Mo evading this block. -DJSasso (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Rocket Richard Trophy

Until the regular season is over, and the league makes an announcement regarding Auston Matthews finishing the season with the most goals that would have him clinch it, he is not officially the winner at the moment. It is morally suggested that any edits in relations to the trophy he will need to wait in order for it to be deemed his, are to be ceased until Wednesday, as there is vandalism that appears to be leading to edit-warring going on, due to a lack of declaration from relevant sources. Hopefully there can be a friendly understanding. User talk:Jacked14

2021 Stanley Cup playoffs

If you have something to say about the content that you're attempting to remove this would be a good place to do it. Otherwise you're just edit warring and I don't think it would be in your best interest to do that. Deadman137 (talk) 09:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Zach Parise, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The same applies to Ryan Suter and all other infoboxes. In addition, you have already been told not to change from "Free agent" to "Free Agent" in infoboxes per MOS:CAPS at User talk:Moka Mo#"Free agent" vs "Free Agent". – Sabbatino (talk) 15:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tony DeAngelo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please read this article. He doesn't become a UFA until Wednesday, when the market opens. — Ghost River 18:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2014 Stanley Cup Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dustin Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing locations in leads

Hello Moka Mo, please read WP:ASTONISH. The leading sentences for the Arizona Coyotes, Florida Panthers, and Vegas Golden Knights should mention the more widely known area first due to name of the teams being vague and the specific locations of the arenas being less known, therefore likely making more sense to less informed readers. Also, since these types of edits have been reverted multiple times, by multiple editors, you should be following WP:BRD and have taken it to the talk page or WT:WikiProject Ice Hockey. Otherwise, it would appear you are in a slow edit war. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 NHL expansion

Howdy, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey#Wikiproject notice, we don't show diacritics in North American non-player articles (like 2021 NHL Expansion Draft). GoodDay (talk) 01:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Kraken roster

Hello, I'm Sabbatino. Your recent edit to the page Template:Seattle Kraken roster appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tony DeAngelo

Hello, I'm GhostRiver. Your recent edit to the page Tony DeAngelo appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Ghost River 15:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blackhawks

FWIW, the Blackhawks official website do have Murphy & DeBrincat shown as alternate captains. GoodDay (talk) 22:50, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nico Hischier

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nico Hischier. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trades

Hey, why you don't add references right away? Could be too early, could be not official. I always have to check if it's official already AND a ref afterwards. Kante4 (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Deadman137 (talk) 23:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Start adding references to your claims or you will be reported and suddenly blocked, because you have been doing this for way too long. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CarlJohnsonGTA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CarlJohnsonGTA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomáš Tatar. This also applies to many other BLPs where you added content without adding references. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EASTER has an RFC

WP:EASTER has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Hwy43 (talk) 00:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Casey Cizikas. The same applies to Anthony Beauvillier, Kyle Palmieri, Ilya Sorokin and many other pages. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

What was the rationale for making the short description of team pages inconsistent with their lead sentence w.r.t. "team" vs. "franchise"?[1] You did not supply an edit summary, and I'm not aware of an existing consensus among the various sports you edited. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 03:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the user's seemingly disruptive nature (warned multiple times in the past) and no consensus to change them, I'd just go ahead and mass revert. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 08:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba and Dissident93: I am also not a fan of replacing "team" with "franchise", such as Moka's change to the Arizona Coyotes. The current "team" is based in Glendale, but the "franchise" has also been a team in Winnipeg, which has its own page. Yosemiter (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the policy Wikipedia:Civility states: Editors are expected to be reasonably cooperative ... and to be responsive to good-faith questions. It would be greatly appreciated if you explain your rationale for your changes, or otherwise voluntarily undo them. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 15:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dissident93 and Yosemiter: I've reverted the NBA teams. There's still MLB, NHL, and NFL.—Bagumba (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba and Dissident93: I've completed the NHL team reverts. I also wish Mo would respond, it's not a good look to appear as unresponsive. Yosemiter (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not responding. I apologize for the edits. I cannot remember what my reasoning was. You can revert them if you wish. Moka Mo (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hitting for cycle

Please do not add that to the infobox per Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice.-- Yankees10 01:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 (flags)

Hi. Please stop adding flags to list articles per MOS:FLAGS and specifically WP:WORDPRECEDENCE. Representation of different provinces is not pertinent to the purpose of these lists/tables. Hwy43 (talk) 06:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Fox (ice hockey). You once again keep your disruptive behavior so I suggest you read WP:PROVEIT. – Sabbatino (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Error

I don't think this is correct .. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Max_Fried&diff=1055641802&oldid=1055387425

--2603:7000:2143:8500:15CC:1524:B3F9:F80B (talk) 06:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Hughes (ice hockey, born 2001). Sabbatino (talk) 04:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unsourced content

Which part of WP:PROVEIT you do not understand? You have already been blocked twice for the addition of unsourced content so the third block would probably be your last block here. I advise you to start adding sources. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noah Dobson edit

I thought I had removed his first fight after I posted it as the nhl changed the ruling on the penalties anyway - sorry about that

You had also said “who cares” I care. I’m guessing a lot of hockey fans would find it interesting. Rvohora (talk) 13:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did I really say "who cares"? Damn. I'm sorry about that. Moka Mo (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wordmark

You have been adding "Wordmark" to the infobox of several places. Please take a moment to look at Template:Infobox settlement, where it explains that that parameter is to be populated by the type of emblem, such as an "official logo, crest, emblem, etc." It is not for the type of font used, or the particular shape of the characters in the logo. Would you have a moment to go back and correct these? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please respond. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Friend, you added an error to a number of high-traffic articles. These will need to be fixed. If you refuse to correct your errors, and expect other editors to fix them while continue editing, it will certainly make you appear as if you are not editing in good faith. I'm urging you to respond. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fairview, Nova Scotia. Aloha27 talk 03:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Travis Konecny, you may be blocked from editing. Per MOS:SEAOFBLUE, we do not link larger territorial units like states or provinces. London, Ontario should be a singular link. I have also reverted your edit on Brandon Tanev for the same reason. — Ghost River 19:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 04:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Kansas City, Missouri. Peaceray (talk) 04:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Albuquerque, New Mexico. Peaceray (talk) 04:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anchorage, Alaska. Peaceray (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kansas City, Missouri. This editor refuses to acknowledge reversions or explain why they are reverting others. Peaceray (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Albuquerque, New Mexico. Again, reversion without explanation. Peaceray (talk) 20:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Random bolding

Stop using bold for emphasis. Read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting. Neither NT or NWT are redirects to the article but Territoires du Nord-Ouest is. Also the abbreviations are common and no "sometimes". Also don't overlink. On two consecutive lines you linked Yellowknife when one was sufficient. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Waverley, Nova Scotia

The Canadian Geographical Names Database lists Waverley, Nova Scotia as an "unincorporated place" and "community', and it is one of many communities within the regional municipality of Halifax. Why did you add here that Waverley is a "neighbourhood"? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions of U.S. states

At Florida, and many other places, you changed the short description from "State in the United States" to "State of the United States". Florida is, in fact, as state in the United States. No confusion. "State of the United States" could be confused with something describing the condition of Florida (as in the state of matter). Could you please tell me--specifically--what was wrong with the unambiguous description "State in the United States"? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I'd like to know what is why the vague "State in the United States" is better than "State in southeastern United States" for Alabama. Regards, -Fnlayson (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Moka Mo. Please stop adding more short descriptions and respond to myself and User:Fnlayson. There are lengthy discussions on your talk page already about your competence with short descriptions, and I see you are now changing all the state descriptions to "State in the United States", which makes me wonder if you have any idea what you are doing. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Magnolia677: I'd assume they wanted to standardize to either "state in" or "state of", and since you said that "state of" was inappropriate, they standardized everything to "state in". We probably should be consistent here, but I'd prefer "U.S. state"—the disambiguation we use for Georgia—since short descriptions are intended to be used for disambiguation. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, U.S. state is good. NY and WA use (state), but that's because their main alternative meanings (NYC and DC) are also U.S. places, whereas Georgia (country) is also a state. Certes (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to make a similar point about Perth, where the SD (a) is already generated in the infobox (b) needn't inform the reader which country Western Australia is in. Please change the SD only if the new text is better than the old version, bearing in mind that many templates such as infoboxes already generate consistently good SDs. Certes (talk) 01:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 20:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's too bad, that Moka Mo chose to 'not' communicate with the rest of the community, lately. One can't keep moving full steam ahead & ignore everyone. Sooner or later, it's gonna be stopped. GoodDay (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, it is a shame, because I think Moka Mo had much to contribute constructively. However, Moka Mo clearly violated enwiki policy at Wikipedia:Civility § Avoiding incivility (specifically by omitting edit summaries), Wikipedia:Dispute resolution (by refusing to engage with other editors in discussions on one's own behavior), & Wikipedia:Edit warring (by reverting others' reverts without so much as an explanation). Peaceray (talk) 23:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They could have been a very good active gnome, but I can't say I'm terribly upset that I won't have to revert their unsourced additions anymore. Some cleanup may be useful on baseball and hockey articles; one of their other recent projects involved some MOS:SEAOFBLUE violations. — Ghost River 00:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. We need good WP:WikiGnomes, but they have to be willing to communicate, and to learn from their mistakes. BilCat (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The block seemed harsh at first glance but competence is required. {{uw-editsummary2}} describes a small part of the problem well, but do we have a broader "please reply, communicate and collaborate" template for use in future cases? Certes (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba: Roje Vala (talk · contribs) has a similar editing pattern, behavior (refusal to communicate) and a lot of pages were edited by both editors. There is also quite a number of warnings on the editor's talk page. Therefore, I wonder if these two are connected somehow, because there are many similarities. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabbatino: It look like a recent checkuser was done at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moka Mo, but that account did not come up. If you have behavioral evidence, i.e. diffs, that prove similarities, feel free to open a new SPI.—Bagumba (talk) 14:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moka Mo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VenomSnakeartwork.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VenomSnakeartwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]