Just as a heads up... the tennis performance charts are pretty locked by consensus guidelines as to formatting. Changing Naomi Osaka's chart made it quite different than all other charts so I changed it back per Tennis Project guidelines. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fyunck(click), No, it isn't: table captions are part of the table. And yes, must: "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about". It seems like you are confused here. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯18:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I read it all and it is not "must" when you have a section titled the same. You seem to have left out the next sentence where it ... "is recommended as a best practice". We already have it right in the section header so its not needed to repeat it. It would look silly. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fyunck(click), Yes, it is. "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about" is very clear and there was recently an RfC on this. It doesn't say "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about unless there are section titles" or "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about, except for tennis articles". The blind deserve accessibility about this tennis player as much as any other topic on Wikipedia. Why are you fighting me on this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯19:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bro, can you check out my edits on {{Template:Eminem}}, I think I messed up a lil'. ALso, between me 'n you, check out my previous edits if they're alright. Trust u. Peace ♥ L to the K (talk)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!18:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
Overall winner
1st - $500
2nd - $200
3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
El C, It was really just two instances (with two reverts), I reverted myself, this is stale, and my self-reverted was itself reverted by another user. There is no systemic problem here as I reached out to the user on his talk page, the article talk page, and at a noticeboard asking for input (hence my self-revert was reverted). What is the problem here? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯21:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
El C, Put alternately, had I clicked on the "restore this version" script twice it would have been the same effect as pressing "(undo)" four times. Are you telling me that the former would have been acceptable and the latter wouldn't? It's literally the exact same thing: see the page history. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯21:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Under the rule that consecutive edits count as one for revert-rule purposes, there was no violation here. More importantly, when Koavf realized that he was becoming embroiled in a revert cycle, he stepped back from it and posted to request others' input on the disputed material. Isn't that exactly what both you and I, in admittedly different ways, have encouraged him to do? Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. I have misread the diffs. Sorry Justin — I hope you will accept my apologies for this error and any distress it may have caused. El_C00:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see this has been resolved, and that everyone has kissed and made up. That's great.
But since I was pinged here and invited to weigh in, may I just gently note that El_C on 3RR patrol wrt Justin isn't a great look at this stage, even if the complaint had not been based on a misinterpretation of events. I am sure that the intentions are all good, but from some angles this looks a bit analogous to an overzealous traffic cop following a "usual suspect" to see if they make a minor error in their driving. I am sure that is not El C's intent, and that the misinterpretation was a thoroughly good faith human error of the sort we all make from time to time in assessing a complex series of diffs ... but I think a reduction in the levels of scrutiny would be beneficial to all involved.
This user was rejected for adminship by the community and is not a Wikipedia administrator. As such, this user does not have the ability to make blocks, delete articles, suppress edits, or protect pages.
Note that this user has been rejected for adminship more than once. Refer to this user's most recent linked request for adminship for more information.
Per WP:RfA, Requests for adminship (RfA) is the process by which the Wikipedia community decides who will become administrators (also known as admins or sysops), who are users with access to additional technical features that aid in maintenance. Among other functions, administrators are responsible for blocking users from editing, controlling page protection, and deleting pages.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I noticed that on your userpage, the images on the top left and bottom right cross into the MediaWiki interface. Per WP:SMI, formatting which disrupt the MediaWiki interface, for example by preventing important links or controls from being easily seen may be removed or remedied by any user. On the desktop site, File:Banksy - Rat Photographer.jpg is displayed under and obscures the "Main page" link. It would be preferable if you could remedy this yourself. Thanks --17jiangz1 (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Living in a Ghost Town you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very glad to have reminded you, maybe we'll be able to get this to GA status as quickly as today once I have completed the review? --K. Peake09:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!23:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians interested in the Algeria national football team
Hello. Many thanks for your edits / fixes to my recent changes to the Coltrane Offering page. I hope you don't mind a quick question. I've made a number of edits over the past ten months (for ex. October Revolution in Jazz) and nearly all of them use the inline form of referencing. Can you please tell me why the use of inline references was incorrect in the Offering page, as per your comment ? Again, thank you for your time and help.Helen Puffer Thwait (talk) 11:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Helen Puffer Thwait, No worries, Helen, and again, thanks for your work. It's incorrect there because a different style is used on the page. See WP:CITEVAR. Since there was an established way of doing things, it's not appropriate to change it without some strong consensus. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯16:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
01:57, 11 October 2020 Koavf 12,903 bytes 0 →Episodes01:57, 11 October 2020 Koavf 12,862 bytes -41 →Notes02:01, 11 October 2020 Koavf 12,665 bytes -197 WP:V Tag: Reverted02:22, 11 October 2020 Jhawkinson m 12,862 bytes +197 Undid revision 982901526 by Koavf (talk); It's as Verifyable as anything else in this article. Tags: Undo Reverted02:28, 11 October 2020 Koavf 12,665 bytes -197 Undid revision 982904116 by Jhawkinson (talk) No, other things are sourced. Add a source. Tag: Undo
Justin: Take a look at the Saturday Night Live (season 46)history (and I don't just mean the ones I quoted above. In fact, I don't mean them at all. I mean the edits made by people other than you or myself). The vast majority of edits and facts regarding the content of episodes are unsourced, or at least, nominally sourced to the episode. If you think there isn't good enough sourcing, you should be adding Template:citation needed in preference to removing information, unless there is serious reason to question it. I don't want to engage in edit warring, but I'd ask you to justify your edit here in comparison to all the other edits to the article that have similarly weak justification.
Relatedly, your edit summaries…leave something to be desired. Here you offered no summary at all, and in your SNL edit your summary was only understandable when read in context with the diff ("Verifiable?" "WHAT needed to be verifiable?" A person would have to read the diff to find out.). The summaries are especially helpful to people browsing an extremely-rapidly edited article's history like in Saturday Night Live (season 46). There should also be more than simply the section name, as in your other edits (above).
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thank you for your attention! jhawkinson (talk) 05:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jhawkinson, "you should be adding Template:citation needed in preference to removing information, unless there is serious reason to question it" No, I shouldn't. All information needs a source: the burden is not on me to wait around until someone finds a way to justify every hoax and lie on this site, it's on the person who adds the information. Whomever added this claim learned it from somewhere, so just post "[x] is true<source>" instead of "[x] is true" (just believe me). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯06:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Justin. My above are comments regarding your recent edits, left on your own talk page, which is how Wikipedia editors communicate with each other; I also incoporated Template:uw-es, the standard text for asking editors to improve their edit summary "game," which I hope was not too confusing. See WP:OWNTALK and WP:UOWN, but perhaps you were speaking rhetorically?
Your position above cannot be correct — if it were true, there would be no purpose whatsoever to Template:citation needed. Rather, it is always a judgment call whether information should be removed or that template (or similar) added; you can disagree with me on result of that judgment call, but I do not think you can reasonably disagree that it is a judgment call. I'm the editor who added the information (at least initially; although it was subsequently edited by several others). No source was given because, like most of the information in that article, it comes from watching the episode. A reasonable person might apply the normal rules of Wikipedia and say, "Well, that's original research, it should be removed." But if we were to apply that standard, the vast majority of edits to the article would be removed. And, although the number of edits to the article is much much greater than the number of facts in the article (because most facts are edited many times), even if you review the article, you'll find that most facts are not well-sourced. This is even true if you limit your analysis to the bulleted (•) facts. So, it's striking to me that you would attempt to enforce that rule for one fact, but not for the many others similarly-situated. That's why it's my intention to revert your removal. As for adding a source, again, look at the article. One could claim "[x] is true<source>the episode itself, watch it</source>" but it would be silly to do that for one fact and not the many others to which it applies. I'm certainly prepared to listen if you have reason(s) why the edits in question are different from all others (that's why we're having this conversation!), or if this is merely the first salvo in a fusillade of sourcing-based removals of facts from SNL wikipedia pages. If so, you really ought to raise the issue on the article's Talk page, because I have only edited the article a handful of times, but there are many editors who spend quite a lot of time on it, and they should have something to say about such a sea change in editorial values. But absent that, I expect I will revert your removal, since you can't seem to distinguish it. Thanks. jhawkinson (talk) 06:3[2, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Jhawkinson, That's a big wall of text. Does the episode have credits that list her? If so, those could be sourced or at least added as an HTML comment. Also, please don't be pedantic to me. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯08:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Justin, that's just how I talk, it seems like a pretty small "wall" as such things go, considering words used for relevant points made. The episode credits do indeed list her, and that was referenced in an edit summary (here ironically in a reversion about notability) and there was also a more fulsome comment pair that explained (here but then removed here for unclear reasons). Saying "please don't be pedantic to me" is like saying "please don't be logically focused on your arguments"; it's not something you can reasonably say to another person, and certainly not on Wikipedia.
I think, also, many of your recent edits to other pages in the SNL family (to Template:Saturday Night Live, SNL 46, SNLBand, and perhaps to Chloe Fineman) raise similar issues about WP:OR and the factual standard for those edits. Perhaps most importantly, because you omit edit summaries or don't indicate what you're doing there, people who don't monitor those pages in careful detail (ironically…non-pedants?) are likely unaware of the quantity of information you have removed from those pages. We should probably move this discussion to Talk:Saturday_Night_Live_(season_46) although perhaps there's a better forum. Would you care to initiate that? I don't really have a lot of experience with the SNL family of Wikipedia pages, so I defer to you, but I'm happy to begin if you like. jhawkinson (talk) 13:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Again, the question is how to address the general issue of sourcing in the SNL family of articles, which are weakly sourced overall but aggregate a lot of verifiable information that lacks sourcing. My specific concern was why you singled out my edits when they are consistent with the prevailing pattern of edits to those articles, although I think we've addressed my particular issue. jhawkinson (talk) 17:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jhawkinson, I don't think there are outstanding questions on how to source things but again, happy to provide my feedback if you think I have a valuable perspective. I didn't single out your edits. Thanks for sourcing. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯18:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bloodroot (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contemporary classical.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Never, under any circumstances, ping me anywhere on Wikipedia, now and forever. And that includes pinging me for a response to this message. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 03:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, koavf - lol, now it is completely unreadable. If this should be the "correct" or 'right' way (show me, please) I'll never edit anything again, man (at least I'll have to check before, if you are involved).
It reminds me of the discography tables, that were presumably designed for pop artists, but are used for jazz as well (as the determined way), with prominent but blanc chart columns, where all valuable information is 'hidden' (unsortable) in one sole column (eg. Miles Davis discography). I find it easier to look after referenced numbers than search and read the titles again and again in a huge block of text (imagine on a phone's screen) – maybe I am the only one (I use it everywhere for credits).
I can't fathom those decisions, as to sort musicians A-Z, instead of organizing them in a musically meaningful way (lead intruments to rhythm sec, then production); especially when there is obviously a brass or string section it makes no sense to name them in an abstract A-Z scheme, instead of summarizing them – or that "production" is not an instrument etc. (One possibility, I can think of, to make some sense of it is to c+cmd-f the titles and highlight all; but if you take "Bullet" for example, it remains hard to connect them to the refenced instrument, because there is so much text in between).
The point I can respect is when there is already a style established in an article. So, sorry about that (even if there was barely something). But, like I said, I'll try to avoid "your parts" of the wikipedia in the future; appreciation of hours of work undone is limited. I hope, it does not sound to rude./ I leave it to you and wish you the best, MenkinAlRire 21:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Finney1234, I think the undo feature is really helpful if there's a user account (i.e. not an IP address) because it will ping that person. If not, then "Restore This Version" is helpful: I'm pretty sure that I have this option because I have a script installed but I can't recall which one it is. :/ ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯02:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Does the "undo" feature work cleanly if there have been additional modifications between the current time and when the change you plan to undo was created? Finney1234 (talk) 18:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Finney1234, That totally depends: if the software can segregate out just the parts you are undoing, it will but if there are sufficiently complicated subsequent edits, it can't always just undo the bits you want undone. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯18:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"How did you not see it?" - again, because I went STRAIGHT TO THE PLOT. Why is that so hard to understand? Anyway, I really don't give a damn. Have a nice day. Pediadoctor (talk) 23:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
With respect. I believe that you have misunderstood the WP:Disambiguation guideline:
This page in a nutshell: It is necessary to provide links and disambiguation pages so that readers typing in a reasonably likely topic name for more than one Wikipedia topic can quickly navigate to the article they seek.
You never answered my reason for changing it back with a compelling reason. All you did is hide behind editwar BS. So why does EVERY OTHER FREAKIN' PAGE all look the same EXCEPT for American Beauty?????? Answer me this Daddy-O?????
--Spoondivy (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not comparing all of the track listing styles for every page, only the studio album pages. So that's a stretch to go hunting for a page that fits your style and to use that as an argument. Now we go to arbitration because I believe I'm right. --Spoondivy (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Brian Wilson - Our Prayer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
Overall winner
1st - $500
2nd - $200
3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Koavf, I beleive that it would be questionable to not include the Pentecostals if theological influence is our concern. This is important as there is a direct Pentecostal influence on the Charismatic movement and by extension the Evangelical movement which heavily draws upon if not outright embraces Charismatic theology. If we are going to construct a Christian denomination tree based upon theological influence, then the Pentecostals should be included in some manner.
Also, I will repeat my earlier statement on the talk page of that template that Evangelicalism is not a denomination, but rather a movement that draws upon earlier theological thought from various Protestant movements and denominations. I believe that a similar discussion has occurred in the past regarding Arminianism which you deemed to be a movement, and not as a denomination. Keeping Evangelicalism on the template would be contradictory to your past standards for a denomination.
Anyways, I will keep the template as it was before my edits in order to keep the peace. Feel free to discuss potential improvements to this template with me. I really would like to cooperate as this template helps readers to better understand the development of Christianity. Leiwang7 (talk) 22:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be better if I were to simply replace Evangelicalism with Pentecostalism on that template? I will not make any other changes to that template. Please tell me if you would approve such a change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leiwang7 (talk • contribs)
I know that evangelicalism is a huge movement in Protestantism, but evangelicalism is not a denomination as there is not any standard evangelical creed/statement and worship/service practices among any evangelical church. I do see your point as evangelical theology and service practices are quite different to older mainline/non evangelical denominations. I would like to add Pentecostalism to the template without removing Evangelicalism then, but I don't know how to modify the template for additional denominatins. Perhaps, you can do it if you know how to do so, or get someone else who knows to make the change. Leiwang7 (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So I have been editing the text for the The Archives Vol. 1 1963–1972 page for over a decade, ever since this set was released back in 2009. It's me that originally formatted the track list so that all of the individual credits are listed for each song (players, recording date, studio, producers, etc.). As a member of various Neil Young fan communities and Facebook groups, people have told me that it was hard to distinguish what was unreleased on that set from what was previously released (since A LOT of the tracks on Vol. 1 were of previously released material). This is why I had originally bolded any "previously unreleased" text on that page years ago; it was an effort to make it easier for fans to make that distinction in the future. When the track list for Neil Young Archives Volume II: 1972–1976 was announced, I did the same thing with the songs that were previously unreleased on that set, as well as edited song credits as Neil has added songs from that set to his website. However, I noticed that this change was undone, so I reverted it, and then today noticed it was undone again with a note saying that it was "ugly" (paraphrasing). I then reverted these changes, but sent a note explaining that people have told me that they like when songs that are previously unreleased are notated in bold (again, to distinguish these songs amongst all of the other info in that track list), as well as to keep a sense of continuity between the two pages. What I did not appreciate is that, instead of trying to understand things from this perspective, or reaching out to me to describe specifically what you object to about this, you not only undid those changes, but then proceeded to undo the bolding on the Vol. 1 page, as well. Bolding and text that stood literally unchanged for a decade. So essentially what I am saying is that the bolding that I had on both of these pages was not only appreciated by hundreds of Neil Young fans, but requested by them, and I would really appreciate it if you could understand this and accept that this bolding makes it easier for them to know (or reference in the future) what tracks on this set are unreleased, instead of having to read through a bunch of plain white text to find this out. Thank you. 2600:8800:6780:1CE3:B44A:D8DB:5FB4:D4D9 (talk) 03:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there. Sorry for being unclear here. You left some |code= with = in the parameter, which broke them. I probably should have just corrected them, but I did not know if I will have the time so I reverted first and then went on to fix them. Anyway, it should be all fixed now and all should be well. Cheers! --Muhandes (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at South Park (season 24). Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SanAnMan (talk) 02:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Park (season 24) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SanAnMan (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Koavf, have you done many edits like this? The category is entirely empty. Apparently, if you don't have a modern diagnosis, you had no mental illness, despite spending many years in asylums, and the evidence of many of your family and friends. This is incredibly disrespectful to the memory of people with mental illness. Johnbod (talk) 17:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnbod, No, I haven't and no it's not: you could just as easily say that everyone locked up for being a homosexual deviant and categorizing them as having had "mental illness" is incredibly disrespectful. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯20:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well somebody must have been. I will revert your edit anyway. "Vagueness" goes with the territory, and mental illness was not invented in America in the 1950s. Johnbod (talk) 21:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are only 2 "references" - I haven't seen the others, which probably aren't all needed in FR. The answer is OF COURSE both - from EB "A few years after the completion of his Paris series he was lodged in the madhouse of Charenton. Its order and care restored him for a while to health, and he came out and did a little more work, but at bottom he was exhausted. In 1867 he returned to his asylum, and died there in 1868". You could and should have checked that yourself. Johnbod (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This edit is VANDALISM. Any biography of longer than 100 words of Meryon will tell you this. If you don't like it for some reason, complain on talk, or tag it. Don't just remove it. I have been in the process of expanding Meryon's bio, and have now begun a section on his mental illness, using the 20+ pages on the subject in Collins, Roger, Charles Meryon: A Life, 1999, Garton & Company, ISBN0906030358, 9780906030356. NO MORE VANDALISM here please. Johnbod (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnbod: Removing unsourced information is not "vandalism". Since you seem unfamiliar with our policies on verifiability and original research, I suggest that you read them before you add more unsourced information to the encyclopedia. I also suggest that you read WP:VANDALISM and please point out which part of that page indicates that my edits were "vandalism". ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯11:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnbod, Removing unsourced information is improving the articles. See also {{in use}}, which you can apply to articles where you may be editing for a bit and want to alert other editors. Please read our pages on drafts and userspaces/sandboxes to learn more about how collaboration works on this site. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯11:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't need your advice on how to write articles, thank you. You've never done much of it. You advising people on how to collaborate is pretty much of a joke too - look at our respective talk page pages. I repeat, if you don't like something, either do some minimal research to see it if might actuallty be correct, or tag it. Don't just remove it. Johnbod (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnbod, I will always remove unsourcd information: it's not my job to prove your claims. Also, lol@ me not writing much here. Preposterous. Please don't post lies to my talk page, thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯22:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll concede that most of your changes are defensible on the grounds that the Web was invented in Europe and therefore it makes more sense to use the British date convention. The one major issue I have is that you also altered a date in a document title field of a citation from September 10, 1993 to 10 September 1993. That is problematic because in citations, the tradition is to exactly quote the title of the thing cited. --Coolcaesar (talk) 15:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've just watchlisted the Fugging page and found that you recently reverted a move by Steven a91. I was unaware of this when I put in a requested move. You might want to take a look and maybe comment there. Mjroots (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, regarding this edit in bromine, introducing {{sub}}, {{sup}}. At first glance, it looks trivial and so unnecessary. Then, reading the {{sup/doc}} it says: "a good candidate for substituting (i.e. {{subst:sup}})", which would ... reintroduce the tags. So to me it does not look like a useful edit. Are there ideas I do not see? If not, I'd suggest not making such edits. Have a nice edit, -DePiep (talk) 14:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DePiep, Help:HTML in wikitext says to prefer MediaWiki markup to raw HTML. Agreed that this one is a little silly if you're going to substitute it but templates are easier and to input than tags, so unless the page is nearing its maximum amount of transclusions, that would be a reason to keep them. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯01:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Elliot Page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I understand that you take a hardline view of WP:V's application to unsourced content, but this absolutely does not give you license to edit war to unilaterally turn established pages into redirects. You must establish consensus at Page's talk page, AfD, or another suitable venue before doing so.{{u|Sdkb}}talk08:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For context for any talk page stalkers, Justin converted the awards page to a redirect, I reverted after several editors raised concerns at Page's talk page, and he subsequently edit warred to force the redirect.
Regarding your argument that AfD is not for pages the nominator thinks should be converted to redirects, it's used all the time for that purpose, and the part you quoted explicitly refers to uncontested redirects, not all redirects. And even if AfD is not the proper forum, that would mean Page's talk page is, and there is absolutely no way to construe the discussion so far there as consensus for your edit. You're an experienced editor and you know what consensus means. {{u|Sdkb}}talk08:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sdkb, I didn't. Also, if you don't want to fork, then keep the discussion at the original post which is on your talk. You had no need to post here at all, which you know. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯09:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I cite the information I insert into Wikipedia. Reverting your unilateral conversion of an established page into a redirect is quite different. Again, if you feel so confident in your position, go establish a consensus that the page should not exist until it's properly sourced. {{u|Sdkb}}talk08:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sdkb, As I have already told you: Please see WP:BLP (emphasis in original): "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source." Please also see Wikipedia:Core content policies. Let me know if there are more rules here that you aren't familiar with that may aid you in editing. And as I have also already told you (emphasis in original): "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Which rules don't apply to you but only apply to everyone else? Is there some way to know ahead of time so that I don't bother you by pointing you to our core content policies? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯09:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looking through your block log, I see that this is part of a pattern. I'll bow out here since I see another editor has restored the page, but courtesy pinging blocking admin Joe Roe in case the conduct issue here warrants follow-up. {{u|Sdkb}}talk09:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sdkb, Yes, please do stop badgering me about this and follow the rules. You're a rude person who just ignores all my questions and thinks that rules don't apply to you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯09:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I have every right to revert twice and I did post to the talk page as well as the other user's talk (which was ignored). This is also stale, as the article now has actual citations, which it should have had the entire time. See User_talk:Koavf#Reverts: am under no special editing restrictions that disallow me from making two reverts to a page, just like anyone else and there is no chance of me harming the encyclopedia by reverting because sources have been added to the article in question. (Even if they hadn't been, I wouldn't have broken WP:3RR. If the community wants to put me on some 1-RR restriction, they can but they haven't, so I shouldn't be punished for breaking a rule that doesn't exist. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC) }―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯09:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
As stated at WP:EW: "The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is perfectly possible to engage in an edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so." 3RR is not an entitlement to any particular number of reverts; you can be determined to be edit warring with fewer than 3 reverts. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sorry to butt in here but Justin you're well aware of WP:RFD by now and you're well aware that if reverted you would need to stop the reverting and seek consensus for that change (be it at the talkpage or RFD), Whether the article's cited or not is irrelevant - you still edit warred which is the crux of the issue here.
You've been blocked 3 times this year alone for edit warring and despite the various unblocks with commitments we're back here yet again with you being blocked. I'm not lecturing you but it's hard to defend you or say "you deserve another chance" when you've had countless chances this year and last year. Your promises or commitments just sort of mean nothing after a while when you're reblocked for the same thing again. –Davey2010Talk09:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) The issue above is indeed exactly the same thing I blocked you for before. Since then, you have been blocked for edit warring a further three times and each time you promised to stop doing this kind of thing [5][6][7]. Enough is enough. WP:V is not an exemption to our fourth pillar, consensus, nor is lack of references an exemption to the deletion policy. I can't take in good faith your contention that you do not know that AfD can be used for proposed blank-and-redirects, because you've been told otherwise many times: you seem to be conveniently overlooking the word "uncontested" when you quote fromWP:AFD, as well as WP:ATD-R, which says Suitable venues for seeking a consensus if a redirection is challenged include the article's talk page and Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion, and WP:DEL-REASON, which says Reasons for deletion include [...] Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed. In any case, if you don't want to use AfD, use the talk page. It doesn't matter where consensus-building happens as long as it is happening, rather than you edit warring to impose your preferred outcome.
Personally, I'm not willing to unblock you this time unless you are willing to agree to a formal sanction that will stop this disruptive edit warring. Although you are of course welcome to appeal to another admin or at WP:AN. – Joe (talk) 09:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Joe Roe, If the community has some kind of formal rule about my editing, I'll obey it (which, to be clear, has happened before and said rules have been lifted after long-term compliance with them). Right now, I'm not under any reverting restriction that anyone else doesn't have. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯09:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Davey2010, I am aware of RfD and I didn't think it needed to be invoked because I didn't think it should be deleted. It would be up to some other user to propose it there, not me. I am under no special editing restriction that I'm not allowed to revert twice and if you look above, that is exactly what happened at this thread: User_talk:Koavf#Reverts. I posted to a relevant talk page and the user's talk page as well in the interim. It is not justified to block me from editing the encyclopedia indefinitely.
Koavf, I am willing to grant you a conditional unblock. Since you've already implied you could live with a 1RR restriction we would do that. However, before I could agree with that I would need a sense that you understand that edit warring is not strictly about number of reverts. That is the piece that seems to be missing in the discussion about this incident so far. Without that I worry we'd end up with you once again blocked and being confused about why after engaging in some kind of edit war that didn't strictly violate 1RR. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
0RR would be more appropriate; the flashpoint here seems to be when another editor reverts koavf, typically after he removes content. The time to start a discussion is then, when the edit is contested, not one round of edit warring later.
However, given the tedious repetition of this same issue over the last year, and the amount of community effort his last appeal sucked up, I think a cooling-off period before any unblock is in order. Possibly also a wider discussion on what unblock conditions would be acceptable, or whether he should be unblocked at all. – Joe (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I thought about whether suggesting 0RR was more appropriate and don't think it is because of concerns I have about enforcement and because in my search I saw no active 0RR unblock conditions imposed. In terms of your idea that a larger discussion and/or some time away from the project might be more appropriate (I am intentionally not saying a cooling-off period) that's fair and very well might be correct. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Barkeep49, this is a bad idea. Koavf has shown repeatedly that they do not understand what edit warring is (or they think they're entitled to edit war anyway), that they do not learn from past mistakes, and that they rapidly forget commitments they make when appealing their many blocks. This is their twenty-first block in fifteen years specifically for edit warring, among numerous other blocks for different repeat issues. Many of those blocks have been successfully appealed, but here we are again, for the 21st time. Six of those edit-warring blocks were enforcement of an Arbcom 1RR restriction that they agreed to but then repeatedly violated anyway. They agreed just in July this year that they would not edit-war but seek discussion and mainstream dispute resolution when they encounter content disputes, and were re-blocked less than a month later for, you guessed it, edit warring. In my opinion this appeal should be reviewed by the community. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In particular I'm concerned that they seem to be saying they will only follow our written policies if the community explicitly and directly says that they, individually, must do so, especially because they have not followed such restrictions in the past. That's not how policies work. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ivan, I am also concerned that they seem to be saying that they will only follow our written policies if it's explicitly stated. And the idea that he would only respect something the community told him is, for me, a reason not to go take this to AN/ANI for a community, rather than individual administrator, imposed block. At least so far in this conversation I don't see Koavf saying all the right things - saying that because he didn't violate 3RR is explicitly incorrect. My offer is/was genuine but was dependent on that ability to convince that edit warring wasn't just about counting edits but I respect the idea that you and Joe and Davey are saying that this editor is simply out of chances. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I get what you're saying, Barkeep. Part of the reason I suggest this should go to a community review is because I would think, on the face of it, someone with 38 entries in their block log (not all of them blocks, and not all of them valid, to be fair) would be an obvious candidate for a site ban (as in, someone who has been blocked for the same thing so many times obviously isn't going to stop so let's stop wasting our time; WP:NOTTHERAPY), yet the community has shown patience time and time again with Koavf. Notwithstanding his recurring problems, he is one of our most prolific editors, and works in underserviced but desperately vital behind-the-scenes areas (MOS:ACCESS comes to mind). So, I think it should be up to the community to determine his fate, whether he's unblocked with (more) conditions, or if the community's patience has finally run out. Or something else entirely. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The reply below does not offer me what I had tried to say pretty explicitly I would need to unblock (Edit-warring is not an alternative to discussing how a page should be changed in favor of consensus. does not say anything about how edit warring can happen beyond a set number of reverts). What you've written here feels like it could easily translate into the start of a thread at AN/ANI, and which crucially I think could be framed in a way such that Justin isn't defacto community banned if there's no consensus (always a danger when a block is sent there without being a formal appeal) and thus would still be eligible for unblocking per our normal policy/procedures. So if you think that's the way to go please don't feel like I'm in your way to doing so. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Barkeep49, I respect whatever you think makes the most sense for the betterment of the encyclopedia. If that's [x] days off, then a 1/0RR for [y] time, then I appreciate the opportunity. And to reiterate, yes, edit-warring is unconstructive and does not result in a collaborative encyclopedia. Edit-warring is not an alternative to discussing how a page should be changed in favor of consensus. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯21:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately this doesn't convince me that you understand what edit warring is which is what I'd asked for in my initial statement. Discussion is how we avoid edit warring but that's an answer to a different question. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Barkeep49, Edit warring is behavior where more than one user repeatedly reverts a page in whole or part in lieu of or without reference to discussion for consensus (i.e. if someone continues reverting but also posts to talk as a perfunctory way of having posted to talk but isn't actually engaged in consensus seeking). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯21:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had been waiting to reply anticipating that Ivan would be starting a community discussion. He has now done so. Let's see what the community says and if the community takes no formal action in terms of the block, we can continue this discussion then. Also should you want to have something posted to AN, please just post it here (perhaps in its own section) and I would be happy to copy it over for you. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think a 0RR (undo/rollback/Twinkle rollback and restore) plus 1RR (manual edit/loading old revision manually) restriction would be sensible, combined with an addition to your common.css so you can't accidentally forget. I think your contributions are a net positive. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Jazz: that is extremely leniant, giving this is there 21st block. I think the following need to happen.
Koavf's rollback and PCR are revoked. They can be restored after 1 year
Koavf is on a 0RR restriction, which can be appealed after 6 months.
If successful, he is on 1RR, which can be appealed after another 6 months.
If any appeal is declined, he must wait 6 months to re-appeal.
For at least 6 months, he should have his CSS updated. If he refuses to comply, an interface administrator can do it for him, but if he removes it, he should be blocked indefinitely as a block that can only be appealed to interface administrators.
A checkuser should be scanned when he appeals his 0RR/1RR to make sure he wasn't sockpuppetering.
If he has to revert blatant vandalism, he must say "rvv" in his edit summary. Failure to do so may result in blocks of 24 hours for a first offense.
@HurricaneTracker495: Revoking rollback seems obvious. (what use is the right if all revert links are hidden with CSS?) Don't care much about PCR, I don't have it, it's not needed to contribute. I would allow 1RR manually because that could easily happen even by accident, and it is frequently needed for uncontroversial common wiki work. I think it's actually your 6 month appeal that is extremely lenient. If I must put an end date on the restrictions I suggested, we'd be talking about years, not months. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the 1RR I'm talking about is not restricted to 1RR per 24 hours. More like 1RR and the next revert can happen after the first revert has been forgotten. I suppose that'll take a week at least.. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here is Destroyeraa's comment(since he himself is blocked for socking). I see no harm of having PCR revoked, though if the user has rollback, that should be removed immediately.Has the user misused PCR? ~ Destroyeraa🌀 22:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC). --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 22:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Given that Koavf has already conceded amenability to the community (and presumably an unblocking admin) imposing some kind of revert limit like 1RR during x amount of time, and people are talking about that as a practical approach, I'll also throw in behind that as the solution. Koavf is generally a productive editor, and narrow restrictions that stop a narrow problem are preferable to a "just get lost" ban. even if an "indefinite" but temporary block might've been reasonable until it gets hashed out. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 22:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Would any other editor with the same record of multiple blocks and multiple promises to stop get the above treatment -- a bunch of people discussing ways to unblock them? --Guy Macon (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Guy Macon: Probably. I've seen similar things before. Anyway, I'm not interested in punishment or revenge or "rules are rules" or whatever. What's best for the project? The rest is noise to me. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 01:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What is best for the project is that they stop edit warring. It would be nice if they stopped voluntarily, but they clearly either can not or will not stop, so an indefinite block appears to be the only way to get them to stop.
It is clear that no lesser restriction will get them to stop. The previous 1RR imposed by arbcom didn't get them to stop. The many temporary blocks did not get them to stop. Any promises to stop should be ignored based upon all of the previous promises to stop. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:54, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Guy Macon: I'm not interested in rules. What's best for the project? Compare this: what's best for the human body? It would be best to stop eating junk food. If this is somehow not an option, one may be tempted to indefinitely block the body from eating any food, in other words, starve. This will result in no more junk food being consumed by that body and if that's all you care about, mission accomplished. Personally I care more about the health of the body (and the health of this project), so I'd say dig in. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 07:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Happily someone else has removed it but I just wanted to point out your error in this reversion: no, that's not how definition lists work.
If we used them that way, they what you were saying is that "'dagger', denotes works that have not yet been released" is the definition of the term "key".
That's not at all how that was structured... "Key" was clearly functioning as a pseudo-header and so should have been either an actual heading or rendered in boldface, as per the MOS guidance on pseudo-headers. —Joeyconnick (talk) 20:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Joeyconnick, Actually, this is a really good point: for it to properly be a description (definition) list, it would have to be in the form ;dagger [line break] :Film is not yet released (i.e. not starting with the word "Key"). Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯21:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Joeyconnick This is covered at MOS:DLIST. The <dt> markup ; should not be used for boldfacing (pseudoheadings). We have ''...'' for a reason. The <dd> markup : should not be used for indentation; we have various templates for that, like {{blockindent}} and (for very short stuff}} {{in5}}. Talk pages are just a lost cause at this point, but the actual encyclopedia content should not be intentionally producing invalid markup. If anyone gives you grief about it, point them at MOS:DLIST. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 21:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SMcCandlish, to be clear, I think his interpretation of the definition/description list was actually correct here as the pair is "dagger" and "means in production", not "key" and "dagger means in production". ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯08:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Just had a bunch of argument about this kind of stuff with someone else, too (someone reformatting the list code on talk pages to try to match how they think the code should work rather than what it actually does when rendered). — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 22:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Koavf. A few months ago, an editor (Mcphurphy (talk)) requested me to be a third opinion in a discussion they were having. That discussion and controversy turned out to be a big scholar debate in the talk page of the article Rape in Islamic law. Given that you have a degree in Philosophy maybe you would like to delve into it. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thinker78, Thanks, pal. I think if nothing else, there's a consensus to have me do something else for a bit. I'll make a formal request in 2021 and see what everyone makes of that. In the meantime, have a very merry Christmas, happy new year, and stay safe. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯02:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Brian Wilson - Our Prayer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brian Wilson - Our Prayer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:10, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I've looked for an answer to this question elsewhere without success, so I hope you don't mind this entry. I just created a new page titled Other Afternoons. When I moved the page from my sandbox to the main space, it brought along the history of other pages that I had previously worked on in the sandbox back in November (specifically Spiritual Unity and Live in Paris (1975) (Lost ORTF Recordings)). In other words, the history for Other Afternoons (which I started working on today) contains info regarding edits to other pages.
I contacted user Pigsonthewing and he suggested I ask an admin to undo the page move, delete the new page, and then create the page again. Would you be able / willing to help me do this? I apologize for the trouble.
How is this edit appropriate? When a "short description" is added, the result is that in annotated links, the short description is made to appear to be a definition. Thus in a "See also" section, the following appears:
Michael Hardy, It's appropriate because it's correct. How is it "grossly inappropriate" and why is it that you think it's acceptable to label this edit "imbecilic" in your edit summary? Furthermore, why didn't you provide what you think is a superior short description? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯05:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: It seemed at best something that could only be written by someone who was inattentive while writing it. I'm surprised to see anyone defending it. When an annotated link with the article title and a short phrase is seen, the short phrase is normally taken to be something like a definition. It is absurd to regard the phrase "subset of algebra" as a definition of this concept. Michael Hardy (talk) 06:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Weller, What are you talking about? I don't see anything at Wikipedia:Blocking policy that prohibits me from responding to talk page messages directed at my editing unless you're somehow suggesting that I'm using talk page access as some method to induce someone else to make edits on my behalf, which is clearly not what is happening here. Blocking is done to stop damage to the encyclopedia and I don't think anyone's even alleged that the posts that I've made on my talk page are damaging somehow. Were I using talk page access as some backdoor to evade a block, I could see your argument but otherwise, I don't know where you're getting the idea that I'm not allowed to respond to someone who is soliciting my reasoning on an edit I made. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯21:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!17:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:06, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, my friend! Here's hoping that 2021 is a good year for you. And here's hoping that it's a better year for the entire world than 2020 was. Very best wishes, Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 12:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Simon Peter Hughes, I am 100% ensuring that The Great Gatsby is--either by proofing or uploading or whatever. I have already uploaded an Oscar Micheaux film to Commons (yes, I know I jumped the gun by several hours...) I'm glad that my nation's regressive and ridiculous copyrite laws are at least allowing the public domain to grow here a little bit.
Empire ASTalk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finding Jack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Richard3120, Thanks, Richard. Maybe someday but if nothing else, the community thinks that a break is a good idea and I agree. I hope 2021 is prosperous and safe for you and yours and make sure that you keep up the good work you do around here while I'm doing other things for awhile. I appreciate the good cheer. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯02:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Neil Young - Way Down in the Rust Bucket.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Neil Young - Way Down in the Rust Bucket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!19:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Neil Young - Way Down in the Rust Bucket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
"In general, rights of editors blocked indefinitely should be left as is. Rights specifically related to the reason for blocking may be removed at the discretion of the blocking or unblocking administrators. This also applies to the user rights of site banned editors." -- WP:INDEFRIGHTS
Yeah, there's no reason to believe there's been abuse of that user right that I have seen, so removing it seems punitive rather than preventative. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To expand on the above a bit, I have IPBE, because (at least before the pandemic) I sometimes need to access the Internet from China using Tails (operating system) and Tor (anonymity network). Let's say I was blocked indefinitely over my ongoing feud with User:Example. (Seriously. He is the worse. Thousands of warnings and the admins do nothing.) With IPBE I could still post an appeal on my talk page. Without IPBE I could not. I wouldn't be surprised if WP:UTRS filters Tor exit nodes to avoid denial-of-service attacks. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
According to the edit history for Hanne Gaby Odiele, you made two edits on 26 June 2020 reverting Odiele's pronouns back to she/her after they came out as non-binary and said their pronouns were they/them (as said in the sources cited in that part of the article). Regardless of your own opinions on gender, the validity of the non-binary identity itself and the use of pronouns, a person's pronouns should always be respected and up-to-date in their article. See WP:GENDERID and MOS:BIOGRAPHY.
Also, when you said in your edit summary "Woman are called "she" and that's what's used in all these reliable sources. Who did this and why?"[sic], you are saying that all women use she/her pronouns (which is quite an outdated belief). See the articles on gender expression and gender identity respectively. The guidelines listed in the first paragraph also say that we should infer someone's pronouns and gender identity from up-to-date sources, even if older though more common sources say otherwise.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!17:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!17:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!17:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Mark Oliver Everett - Levity.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mark Oliver Everett - Levity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!19:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!19:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!19:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:10,000 Maniacs - Extended Versions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!19:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!18:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!18:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!18:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!17:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!14:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Talk:Issues Remixes EP. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Issues (Escape the Fate song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Issues (Escape the Fate song). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:52, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!14:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!14:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!14:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!14:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!13:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!14:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Gus dies.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!14:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Koavf. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Finding Jack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, I was wondering if you have any sources on the Krzywicki family and their ownership of the Pogon Litewska coat of arms. Do you know anything about them and their relation to the Gediminids, their history in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth/Grand Duchy of Lithuania? Thank you.KrivisKrivaitis (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:45, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!18:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!18:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Here Lies Love poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Here Lies Love poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
Overall winner
1st - $500
2nd - $200
3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tony1: "Sixth of April" matches the gaphic and grammar better, I think but please do as you wish and don't think that I am soliciting you to edit in any particular way or at all. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯05:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:57, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!21:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not in the business of helping companies create articles. The best possible outcome is that they come to the realisation that they are not entitled to a Wikipedia article, Wikipedia isn't a place to promote their business and that we volunteers decide what Wikipedia covers and voluntarily withdraw. MER-C19:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:David Byrne - American Utopia.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:David Byrne - American Utopia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!20:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!21:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!21:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!20:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Eels - The Myspace Transmissions Session 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!21:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk07:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk07:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk07:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Caro7200: Thanks, Caro! I appreciate the sentiment and I hope that the community would be interested in having me back but it's not a bad thing to take a break (even if an imposed one) and to think thru things that were problems in the past. I hope you and yours are well and that 2022 includes a lot of great things for you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯18:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt: Danke, meine Freund! (Meine Deutsche nicht ist gut... :/) Maybe in 2022, the community will think I'm an asset to en.wp. Here's hoping. In the meantime, there's lots to do in the wikisphere and beyond. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯08:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, deutsch ist gut zu verstehen ;) - we miss to many (dead, left, driven away ...), leaving too much work for me ;) - you might clean up this talk, no? - mach's gut, and enjoy what you do! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rubbish computerPing me or leave a message on my talk page is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Rlink2 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk20:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk16:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk16:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk16:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk18:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk17:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk17:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk17:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk17:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk17:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!22:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
First Wikipedia and now reddit. We definitely live in a tumultuous time. Be sure to keep making good contributions to other Wikiprojects and websites, you have done some great work on Wikipedia and elsewhere. Yleventa2 (talk) 13:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yleventa2: Thanks. I swear the Reddit thing must be some weird misunderstanding or someone hacking my account or something: it makes no sense at all. This block is valid and legit: it was all my fault. Anyway. Thanks for the encouragement, it's genuinely very sweet. I'm hoping that sometime this year the community here will see the value in me editing again, but all I can do is try to be a good Netizen and maybe gain back trust at some point. Stay safe, friend. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯14:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: You're welcome. Hopefully, reddit will be able to figure out what really happened. I'm sure that you can join again someday. I will stay safe, thanks. Yleventa2 (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yleventa2: Super-weird. They just wrote me a message saying, "Oh yeah, you never did anything to warrant this. Whoops. Responses to this message will not be read." Okay. Very weird. Anyway, maybe I'll request that the community here consider me editing again this year, but ultimately, it's a good thing that I have been away and that I reassess my own attitudes and if I can provide confidence- and trust-building to my colleagues here, that will force me to be a better person and Netizen. As always, it's out of my hands other than to make the request, but I don't have a plan to do that immediately. Thanks as always for the encouragement. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯00:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!06:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Justin, I know you are the first editor on Wikipedia to log 1,000,000 edits, and I am starting to get concerned about you: This is the situation where you need to be unblock. Please do an unblock review for a second time on your page, Justin. Sorry if I posted. --2601:647:6516:BCA:D65:1FB2:A290:40CD (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, 2601. I would like to be a constructive member at en.wp sometime soon, but for me, it's a little premature to even make the request (and it's still entirely up to the community to decide: I can only make a case and ask for their trust). I hope that my previous edits have been constructive and that others see the value in them, but Joe was right to block me, and it's true that my behavior was too inappropriate to continue. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯23:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reading your recent comments, I personally no longer think a block is needed and would be happy to see an unblock request from you soon. Also, you don't need to appeal to the community, if by that you mean e.g. getting a prior consensus for your unblock at AN/I. The last ANI thread was clear that you're only subject to "a normal indefinite edit-warring block", so myself or any other admin could agree to unblock you individually.. – Joe (talk) 11:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Joe Roe: Wow, how kind. Honestly, it's been useful to clear my head some and some of the inappropriate behavior that I had here over the past few years was not really indicative of who I am or want to be, so I think I'll do this soon. Thanks, Joe. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯15:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perpetual W
Just thinking about you this week and missing your presence on en. :)
I've always appreciated your wikiality & would delight to see you back as well. – SJ +19:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No sourcing found that did not originate from CMT or press releases. While many notable people were involved, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from the show. The sources are just there to describe the competitors and do not mention the show at all.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Koavf. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 09:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're trying to be helpful to me, so I appreciate the intention, but it's not really doing anything constructive. As per above posts, it's really up to me to request an unblock and then it would likely happen or possibly require some community input. At the moment, I'm still using the time off from here to focus on other things and ensure that when I request to come back to participating in this community, I have the right attitude. Thanks again, but I think this is something that I need to initiate. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯22:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering how you got all these languages in the sidebar of your userpage. After doing some searching, I discovered Help:Interlanguage_links#Local_links. It seems that they have to be added manually. I did that on my page. Consider doing the equivalent for your talkpage!
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Matisyahu - Live at Twist & Shout.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Matisyahu - Live at Twist & Shout.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: More specifically, WP:NOTWEBHOST. There is way too much information about your own life on there. You can still write about yourself a little bit, but most of the content has to be related to your editing on Wikipedia. Yleventa2 (talk) 01:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: You say that you want to eventually be unblocked because you are willing to follow the rules, so why will you not follow this simple guideline? It is not fair to those that realize that we are not owners of the userpages. Jytdog also once said "Much of your userpage violates WP:USERPAGE" a few years ago: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?oldid=868964673#TBAN_for_paid_editor (Yes, he is now banned, but he was right in this case). Yleventa2 (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yleventa2, my opinion is that Koavf's user page is actually within the limits stated in WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK, although it may not be that evident. I had to analyze the contents before changing my mind that it was in the blurry part if anything. In the listed chronology there is mainly links to his Wikipedia work. The table of ways to communicate with him are rather useful if other editors want to contact him in a more immediate way than the talk page for advise on Wikipedia issues he may have expertise in. There is a Wikipedia Contributions section, which is something relevant to Wikipedia evidently. The Interests section can be of use to editors who want to talk about articles of said topics to know what are the main interests of Koavf. His Convictions section is full with relevant wikilinks and as such is also relevant to Wikipedia, specially related Wikiprojects. Thinker78 (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite the general public of all experience levels to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Hero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!16:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Justin, you might know me on another website you're active on. It is definitely me who's talking to you here, and I'm here to give some advice for you if you get unblocked here in Wikipedia. My advice is: don't be so confrontational, to the point of harming people, and don't hold grudges over things you may agree or disagree with.
I might confront people whom I disagree with, but I never hold hard grudges. Rather, I will avoid interacting with them if it is too much. I think confrontational attitude, and avoiding discussions always results in unavoidable edit wars. I sometimes chicken out since I am not mentally well myself, but you might be able to handle it better. Let's hope that you don't repeat what you have did that led to your block. Wishing you well, MarioJump83 (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join us at IUPUI University Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by IUPUI University Library, and supported by the Central Indiana Community Foundation—where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!20:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page.
We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the Charlotte Street barbecue area of the Bronx's Crotona Park.
All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
With respect, Ilovemydoodle, what does that have to do with you? All of the relevant information is logged and archived for everyone to read, but at the end of the day it's Justin's block and this is Justin's talk page, not a forum for third parties to chat about him. – Joe (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!23:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Koavf. Just as a heads up, I have nominated this for retargeting, or potential disambiguation, not for deletion. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this that you would like me to convey in the discussion. Cheers! BD2412T17:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, BD. And I think that conveying a comment at the RfD would probably be okay, but I want to avoid even the implication that I'm undermining my ban by having anyone edit by proxy for me, so I think it's best to just let the process play out while I'm on the sidelines. Appreciate the offer. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯20:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
Talk:Keriam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Keriam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Keriam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - nathanielcwm (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join us at Ruth Lilly Law Library for an edit-a-thon on Food Deserts & Food Policy hosted by Ruth Lilly Law Library and United States National Agricultural Library. Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on food deserts, nutrition, and related local and federal food policy.
Thursday, July 28th from 11am-4pm, in Room 235G, Inlow Hall, 530 West New York St. Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Visit the Wikipedia/Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more.
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page.
We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page.
We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of films: A-D requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!23:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the local Wikimedia NYC community for its flagship event to be held all-day on Saturday August 13, 2022 at the Queens Museum, in the context of the 1939/1964 fairgrounds at Flushing Meadows–Corona Park. There will also be smaller sessions for much of August 12-14 (Friday, Saturday, Sunday) as hybrid local gatherings for the global online conference Wikimania 2022.
All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!22:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Phoenix - Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix Remixes.png
Thanks for uploading File:Phoenix - Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix Remixes.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page.
We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!04:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:22, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to be a productive member of the community again, engaging in constructive and collaborative edits and not using reversions as a means of edit-warring. Future disputes will be handled with the dispute resolution process.
Accept reason:
Although my initial block was reviewed and endorsed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive327#User Koavf block review, it was not converted into a community ban and in closing the discussion Primefac explicitly noted that it was still a a normal indefinite edit-warring block that can be reversed by any admin. Koavf has waited nearly two years to make this request and, in the mean time, acknowledged here that the edit warring that led to the block was inappropriate. I think it's unlikely it will be a problem again. I'm going to assume that you're going to be very careful with the revert button from now on, Justin, so won't make any formal unblock conditions, though based on the last ANI discussion it might be that the community will impose a 1RR restriction separately. Welcome back. – Joe (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vanished (album). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 21#Vanished (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
As someone who has frequently edited the Arrowverse article in the past, you may be interested in participating in the newly created Arrowverse task force. -- /Alex/21 03:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
El_C 00:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Living in a Ghost Town for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thank you for your attention! jhawkinson (talk) 05:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
; see Talk:Living in a Ghost Town for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanAnMan (talk • contribs)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Elliot Page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I understand that you take a hardline view of WP:V's application to unsourced content, but this absolutely does not give you license to edit war to unilaterally turn established pages into redirects. You must establish consensus at Page's talk page, AfD, or another suitable venue before doing so. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 08:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Template:Scottish English editnotice has been nominated for merging with Template:Scottish English. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Template:Life in the African Union has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
_-The_Consolidated_Bank_of_Success._May_courage_and_good_health_your_course_keep_clear,_and_fortune_favour_you_through_all_the_year._(Draft_novelty_Christmas_and_New_Year_(21475177870).jpg){kind=spacer}
Done ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Keriam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Keriam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Keriam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - nathanielcwm (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
