User talk:Kinu/Archive 16
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kinu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 |
Why you delete the micronation Frestovenia
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello. You have deleted the micronation Frestovenia at the list of currencies of micronations.Europeanfret (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Extended confirmed protection
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
 Hello, Kinu. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. |
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC) |
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu. A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best. If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC) |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
 Hello, Kinu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
Hello!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC) |
salted page recreation
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi there, it seems you where the most recent admin to review the deletion discussion and salting around Nicholas Alahverdian. It seems there is some recent news around the case that made the person known - childcare in RI and his involvement in some lobbying. A new author has circumvented the salting by introducing an article with a slightly misspelled name Nicolas Alahverdian. I was wondering if you have any guidance in this case? My initial reaction was a CSD, but given time has moved on and it appears there may be some lobbying done, this may require another look? The two related deletion discussions are Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alahverdian v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, et al and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Alahverdian. Many thanks! Jake Brockman (talk) 10:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC) |
I noticed you program in JavaScript...
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
The JavaScript WikiProject is now up and running. We organize and develop JavaScript articles, navigation aids, and user scripts. Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page. For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts. The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list. Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 15:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC) |
Extended confirm user
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Am I a extended confirm user if not how do I become one Colored (talk) 18:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC) |
Invitation to Admin confidence survey
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment. The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators. To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form. We really appreciate your input! Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team. For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, Kinu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
11 years of adminship!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
Your signature
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated You are encouraged to change
to
—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
|
13 years of editing, today
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
Jesse Waugh (artist)
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thanks for salting Jesse Waugh. Jesse Waugh (artist) and Jesse R. Waugh (artist) might also be good to salt. All told, although it is hard to keep track, there have been three AfDs and four or five page deletions ( Jesse R. Waugh and Jesse Waugh) via AfD or speedy. Thanks.104.163.147.121 (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu So if I request that the Giger site add the reference AND get consensus on the Giger article to mention this commercial then would this article be a keep ? Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 11:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
|
Typo on RDMA
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
You presumably wanted "x·4x", not "x·4x2". Otherwise, great answer. Cheers! -- ToE 19:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
|
UTSA library is working with 2 history classes on creating Wikipedia articles/edits on Women of San Antonio
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello from a fellow Roadrunner! Kinu, this semester the UTSA library is working with two History faculty members on Wikipedia class projects. Students in two classes (Historical Methods, History of San Antonio) will be given assignments to write research papers on notable women who had/have a connection to San Antonio. We're planning a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon on November 10, where interested students (these are undergrads) will bring their research papers and will receive help creating basic articles or improving existing articles. Do you have any advice for us, or would you be interested in working with us in some way? Cheers, Kemphem (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
Cambium Networks
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
The Cambium Networks Wikipedia page was removed due to disruptive editing in 2016. I fully understand the reason, and apologize for this activity now 2½ years ago. Over that time, our company has changed and there are more citations available. I ask for your reconsideration for us to have a presence on Wikipedia. Cambium Networks will abide by the rules. We would like to be able to professionally share information with readers who are seeking the details on our company. Here are some recent stories that may qualify Cambium Networks for a page: • Being selected by Facebook as a partner for their Express WiFi program • Providing WiFi connectivity to rescue teams in the Thailand Cave Rescue project I appreciate your consideration to have an administrator unblock the page. We will provide a quality page with a neutral, well-cited content. We will abide by the rules. If a conversation with our CEO Atul Bhatnagar would be helpful, I am glad to set this up. --12.220.246.2 (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC) Ray Savich Director, Content Marketing Cambium Networks ray.savich@cambiumnetworks.com 847-640-3621 |
Nomination of Martha Rogers (professor) for deletion
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Rogers (professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 00:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC) |
Why I listed it as vandalism
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thank you for blocking Boogily. I can see why at first glance this might not be obvious vandalism, which is why I originally did not call it this in my edit summaries until recently, so just to clarify; 1) Per the school website, the currently listed principal is correct and there is no need to change it 2) They are purposely spelling the school's name wrong 3) The changes they are making to enrollment are not backed by reliable sources 4) Most importantly for me, their list of notable faculty is just...trash for lack of a better word. For example, "Steve Rabinowitz - One of the humanities teachers, Steve is easily recognizable by his appearance. Many of the students have noted that he looks irritably like Jesus. One of his talents include him being able to respell his last name as Rainbow Zit." As well, I have been recently harassed by students from this school [1] and the page history is full of IPs and new accounts vandalizing this page (like this IP for example, which made the same edits this "new" account is making) so I am being watchful of this. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Username
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hey Kinu, since you seem to be on call, please see User:Wonacottcommunications. And thanks for blocking that Connor dude. 199.80.13.80 (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello, Kinu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
Kmakers
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hey, thanks for this, but any idea if we can find out who it was? Of the people I pinged, almost all are "in good standing" and unlikely to create a sock account that could be tied to them by CU, Dream Focus (talk · contribs) already knows I'm on to him as I've explicitly stated that I'm convinced the original Malaysian IP was him[2][3] and so if it were the same person and that person was DF they'd have to know there was no way they could get away with it, and of the ones that are blocked (or were placed under a limited ban and left the project, or were clearly only trolling to begin with, got away with it for a few months, then got bored and left) there's basically Brough87 (talk · contribs), C. W. Gilmore (talk · contribs), Expectant of Light (talk · contribs) and JohnWickTwo (talk · contribs). B87, CWG and JWT are all stale for CU purposes, as is EoL but the latter is almost certainly still active under a new account, which Kmakers could be used to catch. |
Untitled
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Abuse is not acceptable Dear Sir firstly I new to wiki and made a few errors on the page I wrote this is not a crime if your long term wiki editor you should be offering advice not bulling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarryConroy5 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Joji Musician Reversion
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
@Kinu: Hi, I would like for you to undo the reversion you did on your part. As I understand I should not have reverted 3 times (though I believe I fall under the exceptions to that rule due to vandalism), the 3RR rule was first broken by JJMC89. On top of which he has been breaking several other rules (such as posting generic templates on my talk page) and has been known to vandalize. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFixerUpper12 (talk • contribs)
|
Please revert my corrections immediately!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello Kinu of Wikipedia. This is Danny Seigle again. For the record, (which i have stated in the help page already), My job position in Alab Pilipinas is Team Consultant (not assistant coach). I am making these corrections to ensure the information on my page is current, accurate and factual. Kindly acknowledge my edits and Please revert it back to my corrections. Anything that says "assistant coach" needs to be corrected to "Team Consultant".I have tried several times to explain via reps and myself why these edits are being done. Someone keeps editing my changes back to assistant coach which is false. I have never been an assistant coach for any team. What do i need to do to prove that I am a CONSULTANT and Not An Assistant coach? I hope that we can resolve this matter as soon as possible. Should you wish to verify my info, you may check the profile page on my twitter & instagram accounts(@dannyseigle42) wc state my job title. Further can i request to be unblocked. Thank you for your understanding!
-Danny Seigle Dannyseigle (talk) 10:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC) ———————————————————————————- Hi Kinu, Here are three articles links from different publications as proof of my correct job title. I hope you find this sufficient enough, and can immediately revert my edits. So to clarify, anything that says assistant coach please change it to Team Consultant. The discrepancy is written in my page five times. In addition "I led San Miguel to 7 championships (not 6) out of 8", this error is found in the first paragraph. Respectfully, Danny https://www.philstar.com/sports/2018/04/18/1806972/danny-seigle-busy-new-role https://fastbreak.com.ph/loaded-danny-seigle-joins-alapag-hontiveros-in-alab/ |
Thank You!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Dear Kinnu, First of all thanks for catching ma mistake. Secondly, its a pleasure to meet a person like you. You possess an excellent bIo over your user page. Regards, SB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saadullah Bhatti (talk • contribs) 23:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC) |
Sockpuppet nonsense
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
you deleted my America's Next Top Best Friend for literally no reason. You said it got deleted because they weren't notable enough. Bullcrap. 1. They interviewed 2 contestants (who themselves were notable from TV, movie & Music video credit roles and such) from the show. 2. They were featured in other notable theatre and entertainment pieces outside of the podcast and 3. They're show expands over 100+ episodes. They ARE notable, what the Hell are you talking about? And I'll have you know that long before you came along there was another user who reviewed at the page and thought it was perfectly fine. This is an injustice. I demand you put the page back immediately. If you don't I'm going to file a complaint. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratherbe2000 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Another edit needs redacting and another IP needs blocking. Thanks. Lard Almighty (talk) 09:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
|
Why you deleted my page
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, I have made all the changes mentioned. Then why did you delete my page? I welcome suggestions on what needs to be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImeandYasir (talk • contribs) 08:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
|
Thank you!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Thank you for your help in blocking Ranquelin and Ryan. It's much appreciated! :) Neot/c 16:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
Speedy Deletion of Malcolm Kendrick page
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Greetings — I strongly object to this deletion and subsequent locking of the subject; not only was the initial page deleted against the objections of a goodly number of people, my stated reasons for arguing against the deletion of the new entry were simply not addressed. There are many, many pages that ought to be expunged from Wikipedia if this one has been — true consistency is sorely lacking on this site, and the actual processes that lie behind actions such as these are veiled from public sunlight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rekleov (talk • contribs)
|
Thanks!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Didn't know WP:DFTT existed. Thanks for telling me! 7_qz (ゆっくりしていってね!) 20:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC) |
Happy New Year, Kinu!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
  Kinu, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages. |
Delta Psi Chi
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Right now there is an article at Delta Psi Chi Swordsmen that in my opinion should be moved to Delta Psi Chi which was blocked back in 2011. I thought I'd reach out to you first before trying things more formally. Note, if you think it should be deleted instead, feel free to RFD it.Naraht (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
|
Happy First Edit Day!
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
  Have a very happy first edit anniversary! From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC) |
Cambium Networks 2019
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
The Cambium Networks Wikipedia page was removed due to disruptive editing in 2016. I fully understand the reason and apologize for this activity now 3 years ago. Over that time, our company has changed and there are more citations available, including our partnership with Facebook XWF and the Terragraph system. Our Massive MU-MIMO technology is delivering 5G performance in fixed wireless broadband. I ask for your reconsideration for us to have a presence on Wikipedia. Cambium Networks will abide by the rules. We would like to be able to professionally share information with readers who are seeking the details of our company. I appreciate your consideration to have an administrator unblock the page. We will provide a quality page with neutral, well-cited content. We will abide by the rules. If a conversation with our CEO Atul Bhatnagar would be helpful, I am glad to arrange a conference12.220.246.2 (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Cite error: There are Ray Savich Director, Content Marketing Cambium Networks ray.savich@cambiumnetworks.com 847-640-3621 |
ArbCom 2019 special circular
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC) |
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC) |
Cambium (NASD: CMBM)
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Kinu, Page at: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Cambium_(company) --> "move" --> Cambium_Networks at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Cambium_(company) You "page protected" the latter four years ago. Can you "move" that? NASDitGuy (talk) 23:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
thank you
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
thank you for blocking that vandal :) Assblastusa (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC) |
A user you blocked is back at it again
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Fresh off their 2 week block, this user is bask.... [[4]] Sethie (talk) 23:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
21rojasjustyn
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu. Many thanks for your block of User:21rojasjustyn. I was considering extending the report at ANI to cover their recent activity. Thank you for saving me the effort and for taking the action of blocking them. I wholeheartedly agree with it. Best, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks for your continued help with 21rojasjustyn
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
|
I think my article should not have been deleted.
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I have already talked to the Tea House and the person who submitted my article for deletion. They both told me to come to you, the person who deleted my article. I created an article about a company called GO Technologies. After I created it, I received a notification on my talk page that the article had been deleted because it was "advertising". I did not mean for the article to come across as advertising, and I don't believe it did. The article was small, but I intended to add more to it later. If you can please tell me which part of the article you deemed as promotional, I would be thankful. If I knew which part you did not approve of i could remove/reword it so that my article might be accepted. Thank you for taking the time to read the lengthy message. Please consider helping me with my problem as this is my first article. DukeOfGrammar (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
|
Teddington School. Reference 14 does not support the statement that the executive head teacher was suspended and then dismissed.
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
The newspaper article at reference 14 only talks about stakeholder reaction to the RI Ofsted decision immediately after publication in February 2018. The above quote is a misrepresentation. John Wilkinson went on long term sick leave the day after the 2 day Ofsted Inspection finished. He eventually resigned his post as Executive Head teacher in August 2018. He was not suspended or dismissed. Unfortunately I cannot cite anything to back this up as the resignation agreement is a contract bound by confidentiality, negotiated through solicitors and the ESFA which contains sensitive information (ie the terms of settlement). I am the Chair of governors who negotiated it. Kathy Pacey was appointed as the new head teacher of Teddington School in October 2018. Teddington School joined the Bourne Education Trust on 1st December 2019. https://www.bourne.education/432/our-current-schools/academy/25/teddington-school I don't have a reference for the date she was appointed, as the Teddington School website was replaced shortly before we joined the trust. Kind regards, Juliet Hartridge — Preceding unsigned comment added by JhartridgeCoLGC (talk • contribs) 07:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Natively Bantu-speaking indigenous South Africans is a general definition. The article didn't give birth to itself so I don't understand what you mean when you say I'm changing things to how I want them. There was an agreement that starting the article with Natively Bantu-speaking indigenous South Africans will make it better, due to elaborating the complexes of the title. Not everyone reading Wikipedia is the same person and Natively Bantu-speaking indigenous South Africans is a smart elaboration to breaking down the article's title. This reasoning of blocking me for making the article better can be applied to that opponent of mine, and looking at the context Natively Bantu-speaking indigenous South Africans is not out of context to the the article, so what exactly will be penalized, the person in a war with me just dislikes that I'm correct and convincing them with their own understanding. Untrammeled (talk) 17:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
|
New articles
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, thanks for reviewing the new article Judith Anne Smith! There’s a backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed, would you please be able to review other articles that I created that are pending review, Joshua Deahl and Yakov Yosef Twersky? Also, I’m active at creating new articles and am very well familiar with WP:PG, due to the backlog, I’ve been waiting two weeks at WP:PERM/A for autopatrolled rights. Would you please be able to review my request? Thanks much! Shemtov613 (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
|
User:Untrammeled
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Greetings! Since you blocked Untrammeled (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I'll mention this to you. Today I noticed a new account, SoSoMorning (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), editing in the same topic areas. On the one hand, they reverted some of Untrammeled's edits.[5] On the other, they show some of the same awkward grammar and wording.[6] Do you think this is just coincidence? —C.Fred (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Ben Saunders (fighter) - rev/del request
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hi Kinu, will you please rev/del this edit [7]? S0091 (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Unblock request
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Would you unblock User:Martinaaperez? You soft-blocked her based on the username policy, and her account has now been renamed. —Emufarmers(T/C) 20:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Service Profit Chain article
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
Hello Kinu, This was my first attempt at an edit - in a subject I know a lot about. The material i posted was my own material from my web site - so how can I have committed copyright violation??
|
thanks for your help
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
thanks for your help with vandalism just now. by the way, you have a great talk page. i'm reading through it. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC) |
About the edit-warring on U.S. Route 2 in Washington
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
I wonder Kinu, why do you think that my updates are not necessary. What started as a baseless accusation of vandalism/disruptive editing has now turned into a 3 month edit-war. Don't you see that semi-protection of yours only lasts 3-months which means that 3 months later unless the faction of warriors that I have been warring with have changed their minds it is destined to reignite. So basically you may be only prolonging the war and I know how you have done great contributions to Wikipedia and that has prized you with the power of being an admin. Though that may change if someone finds you responsible for prolonging the war. So many things can happen. Only another admin or the arbitration committee or Jimbo Wales can determine the consequences. But I must warn you that the consequences can be enormous you can get blocked from editing or you can even lose your privilege of being a admin. Maybe you should click the links I have edited myself and see if anything has changed. If it has then reflect that to the article otherwise leave the article as it was after the war happened. Remember about WP:SQS and WP:3RR because I am sure you have read many times but the next time look at the actual words and meaning about an admins role in this. You may have forgotten something. Wikipedia is neither politics nor is it about the person in power always being right even if they have done something wrong. Please read this message carefully and I would prefer you would keep it though removing this message is also okay as long as you have read if carefully and understood what I am trying to say. Reply in case you have something to say. I do not mean for it to be a personal attack. Though if I made a mistake please tell me. (2601:601:9980:5D80:ECCA:778E:3488:DBA (talk) 20:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC))
|
Thank you
|
|---|
|
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
For the temp block of 70.98.46.100, I just now checked their filter log...holy cow. Shearonink (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC) |