User talk:Kemphem

Help me! I created a new article yesterday in my sandbox and published it. It hasn't yet appeared in Wikipedia, and I wonder if I did something wrong, since it hasn't yet appeared.Kemphem (talk) 00:15, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Kemphem (talk) 00:15, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes your sandbox is a place to edit and fool around. It does not actually appear in the main area of Wikipedia. I have moved your draft to Draft:James L. Kinneavy and put on the Articles for Creation template. You can then submit it for review. Reviewing is backlogged right now and it could take up to 7 weeks. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kermit Oliver has been accepted

Kermit Oliver, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 08:45, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James L. Kinneavy (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is very detailed and well-written. Well done! Please find some sources about Dr. Kinneavy himself and/or his achievements to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James L. Kinneavy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:James L. Kinneavy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 15:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kemphem! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProgrammingGeek^talktome 15:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve María Antonietta Berriozábal

Hello, Kemphem,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating María Antonietta Berriozábal! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your article. There is some verbiage that is not considered neutral or encyclopedic. Please see MOS:WORDS for tips on maintaining a neutral tone. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 00:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James L. Kinneavy

Hello, Kemphem. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James L. Kinneavy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:29, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]