User talk:ItsMeGabeProductions

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ItsMeGabeProductions! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 18:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate edit

Please note that editing other users' comments on talk pages, as you did here, is not appropriate, and that edit was especially inappropriate. If you do this repeatedly, you face a significant block. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine... I'll add it back ItsMeGabeProductions (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue wasn't with you deleting comments but editing them (in this case, changing the heading). Cordless Larry (talk) 13:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Please reply this if you have any red links ItsMeGabeProductions (talk) 07:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Category:Users with many Red Links in their Userpage has been nominated for discussion

Category:Users with many Red Links in their Userpage has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of RedLinks found in articles

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions, What is the purpose of this page? Draft space is for articles that editors are working on, which they will eventually submit to Articles for Creation for review and, hopefully, acceptance into the main space of the project. This looks like a list you are keeping for yourself for some reason. You know, articles on Wikipedia contain hudreds of thousands of red links, they are very common, so keeping a master list isn't really feasible. Do you plan to write articles for all of these subjects to turn the red links, blue? If this is some list you are keeping for your personal use, please move it to your User space or it is likely to be tagged for deletion as it doesn't contain article content. If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do it move it to my userspace? ItsMeGabeProductions (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I* ItsMeGabeProductions (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Central American place name etymologies

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Central American place name etymologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as ItsMeGabe100900 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plonie Scheringa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Plonie Scheringa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CreamyP (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

René Legros moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to René Legros. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plonie Scheringa (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plonie Scheringa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dutch ultra runners

A tag has been placed on Category:Dutch ultra runners indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Annh07 (talk) 12:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asami Kato moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Asami Kato. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Svetlin Kiradzhiev moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Svetlin Kiradzhiev. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 10:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Svetlin Kiradzhiev (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Svetlin Kiradzhiev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mountains in Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Mountains in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:List of Central American place name etymologies

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:List of Central American place name etymologies, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcis Skadmanis (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcis Skadmanis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keio Department Store

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Keio Department Store requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tamāra Zitcere has been accepted

Tamāra Zitcere, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback. Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 14:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Alois von Reigersberg

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 09:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ItsMeGabeProductions/My Pages/Random articles that are fake that I made myself

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:ItsMeGabeProductions/My Pages/Random articles that are fake that I made myself, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UHMMM AKSUALLY ITS MY ARTICLE AND I CAN DO ANYTHING WITH IT BECAUSE IT'S IN MY USER PAGE☝️🤓 ItsMeGabeProductions (talk) 01:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Geographical dictionary of Bulgaria

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Geographical dictionary of Bulgaria, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article. If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks! (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Klbrain (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isahak Melik-Aghamalyan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Isahak Melik-Aghamalyan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hovsep Tigranov moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hovsep Tigranov. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barsegh Gueghanyan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Barsegh Gueghanyan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 06:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barsegh Gueghanyan (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barsegh Gueghanyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Icelandic dioceses

Hi, thanks for your recent article submissions. The various articles about Icelandic dioceses run the risk of being deleted for not meeting the notability policy. Might I suggest creating an article called Dioceses of Iceland instead and writing a paragraph about each diocese there? Stifle (talk) 10:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ruben Miroyan

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Stifle, and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ruben Miroyan, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article. If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stifle}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks! (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Stifle (talk) 09:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Hunanyan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Karen Hunanyan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Stifle (talk) 09:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karen Hunanyan (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Geardona were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karen Hunanyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 19:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruben Miroyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruben Miroyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruben Miroyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Stifle (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. Thank you for your work on Baptiste Hurni. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Mühlemann

Hi, I noticed you started the page as a translation from German Wikipedia. Please note that the Wikipedia license requires attribution, see Help:Translation for instructions on how to do it. Broc (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the same for Vicente Álvarez Pedreira, which you also recently created. Please make sure to correctly provide attribution in the edit summary, or using the template {{translated page}} in the talk page. Let me know if you need help. Broc (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this!

Hi, please stop translating pages from other Wikipedias without providing correct attribution, as you have done at Aleksandar Živanović (singer). See message above for more details. Broc (talk) 08:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI I LIVE IN TRENTON

they hear me

Image tagging for File:Henrique Manzo - Portrait of Dr. Affonso D'escragnolle Taunay, Collection of Museu Paulista from USP.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Henrique Manzo - Portrait of Dr. Affonso D'escragnolle Taunay, Collection of Museu Paulista from USP.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Valentin Bystrov

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Valentin Bystrov, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Bust Gérard Mellier.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Bust Gérard Mellier.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tao la Mashariki moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tao la Mashariki. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. If you would like help with the article, consider seeking assistance at guild of copy editors. // Timothy :: talk 11:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kimhandu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kimhandu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and This is probably an unneeded WP:CFORK of the parent article, drafting to give time to provide sources showing notability and enough material to justify a stand alone article.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. // Timothy :: talk 11:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with Draft:Tao la Mashariki

The article you have created at Draft:Tao la Mashariki is sourced from what looks like a homespun bitmap graphic and a dead link to a travel guide. This is not acceptable sourcing on English Wikipedia. In addition, significant content is not supported by these sources. This sourcing issue will prevent the content from staying per WP:V, even if it is moved into mainspace. When you create articles you need to make sure that they meet English Wikipedia's policies and guidelines regarding sourcing and verifiability. Please read WP:CITE, WP:RS, WP:V. There are problems with grammar, categories, and linking (please read WP:LINKS, WP:SEEALSO, WP:PARENTCAT) but these can be changed if it is accepted into mainspace. This problem is also present in other articles you have written. These articles are important, but they need to be properly written and sourced. Questions can be answered at the WP:TEAHOUSE. // Timothy :: talk 00:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Juan Aicega

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Juan Aicega, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. Thank you for your work on Osvaldo Jaldo. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tao la Mashariki (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tao la Mashariki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 15:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August-Martin Euler

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 06:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Important: Translating articles and attribution

Hi there, I notice you've created a large number of articles. Many of these appear to have been translated from other language Wikipedia sites. When you translate an article, you create what is called a derivative work. The licensing requirements of Wikipedia state that you have to attribute the content you've used. You can see how to do this at Help:Translation. You will need to use the template in "License requirements" part (b) adding it to the talk pages of each and every article you created by translation from another Wikipedia project. You now need to stop creating new articles until you've properly attributed every article you've created this way. Because I see that you've been warned about this by other users, but you are still not following the rules, I've disabled your ability to create any more new articles for now. This is for an initial period of 2 weeks, which might be shortened or lengthened by me or my colleagues when we've worked out what is appropriate. As well as that, a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 08:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block extension

It's been a week since I asked you to properly attribute the articles you created based on machine translation, and judging from your contributions, you have not done anything. I've decided that to protect the encyclopedia from the addition of further copyright violations by you, that the appropriate action is to extend this to an indefinite block from creating new pages.

Indefinite means only "without a defined ending"; it does not mean forever. Once you have demonstrated a willingness to clean up your mess, I or any other administrator can lift this block. But we cannot let you restart after two weeks and leaving a trail after you that other editors have to sort out. Stifle (talk) 10:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you expect me to fix my issue if I cannot even put {{translated page|language-code|source article}} in my articles? Thank you if you resolve my issueItsMeGabeProductions (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you weren't making any efforts so far, but I see that preventing you from creating new pages will prevent you from adding new talk pages too. I've changed it so that you can create new pages but you can not create or edit main namespace (article) pages. Once I see good faith work on adding those attributions, we can look at a further change. Stifle (talk) 08:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done! ItsMeGabeProductions (talk) 09:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsMeGabeProductions: my biggest issue with your articles is the lack of proper sourcing. Just because an article exists on another Wikipedia, does not mean that it meets the standards of English Wikipedia. Translating pages does not provide an exception for sourcing requirements. When you translate an article, you need to make sure it meeting our WP:N notability guidelines and has proper sourcing or add the sourcing before moving it to mainspace. The multitude of drafted articles on your talk page bears this out, an example: Draft:René Legros has ZERO sources. Adding translated articles with significant amounts of unsourced content must stop.

Two questions:

When do you intend to properly source the drafted articles you already created?
What are you going to in the future regarding sourcing in articles you translate?

I think both of these questions deserves an answer. I also think voluntarily deciding you will submit articles through AfC instead of directly to mainspace would help.

A final problem is the names of some of your articles. You can NEVER just accept the machine translation of the title. You need to find the WP:COMMONNAME in English and use this; please read WP:ARTICLETITLE, with special attention to WP:ENGLISHTITLE and WP:TRANSLITERATE. // Timothy :: talk 11:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draget moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Draget. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Stifle (talk) 08:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patricia Hartmann

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patricia Hartmann, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. // Timothy :: talk 23:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing

Hello, I reviewed a the article above and found it very promotional. An uninvolved admin (courtesy ping @Ponyo:) agreed and deleted it.

Question 1: Do you have any connection to the subject of the above article that would constitute a conflict of interest as defined by Wikipedia?
Question 2: Are you or have you ever been paid to edit or create articles?

Thank you for your responses. // Timothy :: talk 23:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giedrė Labuckienė for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giedrė Labuckienė is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giedrė Labuckienė until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 00:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dagobert Böhm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dagobert Böhm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. // Timothy :: talk 00:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Acevedo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Acevedo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Acevedo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 00:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Prokopiev moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alexander Prokopiev. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and BLPs require strong soucing.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. // Timothy :: talk 00:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: René Legros (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:René Legros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 16:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

You have worked to properly attribute the articles you have created, so as I promised, I have unblocked you.

This is not, repeat not, a license to go back to exactly what you have been doing all along.

I would strongly encourage you to put your new articles in as drafts so they can be evaluated by another editor, to ensure the titles are appropriate, and to only translate articles that are properly sourced. When editors raise concerns with you about your articles, I expect you to engage with them and address those concerns, not to ignore them as you seem to have done with respect to most of the messages you've received here so far. It should not require blocks to get your attention or to get you to do what all editors are required to do.

Thank you for stepping onto the right path. Please stay there. Stifle (talk) 08:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Germán Alfaro has been accepted

Germán Alfaro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Brandl (painter) (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NARTIST as well as WP:GNG and demonstrate notablity accordingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Brandl (painter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mouigni Baraka moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mouigni Baraka. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and contains unsourced BLP material. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoubida Assoul has been accepted

Zoubida Assoul, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 10:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olfa Hamdi has been accepted

Olfa Hamdi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 08:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Juan Marcos Angelini has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Juan Marcos Angelini. Thanks! 48 JCL 01:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cole Brings Plenty (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cole Brings Plenty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cole Brings Plenty (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cole Brings Plenty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cole Brings Plenty (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cole Brings Plenty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcis Skadmanis (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like a resume.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcis Skadmanis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 23:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Choi Jungwha

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Choi Jungwha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Asami Kato

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asami Kato, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Marcos Angelini has been accepted

Juan Marcos Angelini, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isahak Melik-Aghamalyan

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isahak Melik-Aghamalyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hovsep Tigranov

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hovsep Tigranov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Barsegh Gueghanyan

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barsegh Gueghanyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Karen Hunanyan

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karen Hunanyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Egebjerg, Odsherred Municipality (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by A09 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add clarifications and some sourcing to the guild paragraph. I have performed some cleanup. More sources are always welcome about the subject as currently draft lacks any sources that aren't database reports.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Egebjerg, Odsherred Municipality and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

A09|(talk) 15:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Güzelce Kasım Paşa has been accepted

Güzelce Kasım Paşa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mouigni Baraka has been accepted

Mouigni Baraka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kimhandu

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kimhandu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tao la Mashariki

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tao la Mashariki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alexander Prokopiev

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexander Prokopiev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Taita Hills

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Taita Hills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aleksandar Živanović (singer)

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mach61, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Aleksandar Živanović (singer), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mach61}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mach61 02:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:René Legros

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:René Legros, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Svetlin Kiradzhiev

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Svetlin Kiradzhiev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Isahak Melik-Aghamalyan

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Isahak Melik-Aghamalyan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hovsep Tigranov

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hovsep Tigranov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tao la Mashariki

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tao la Mashariki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:11, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Levon Tigranyants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Levon Tigranyants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levon Tigranyants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:René Legros

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "René Legros".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Svetlin Kiradzhiev

Hello, ItsMeGabeProductions. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Svetlin Kiradzhiev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viktor Chistov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viktor Chistov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor Chistov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Demt1298 (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]