User talk:Hullian111

Welcome!

Hello, Hullian111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Winifred Holtby Academy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bleaney (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi, the image in Winifred Holtby Academy did not work as images have to be uploaded, with an appropriate licence, first before usage. See WP:Images. Keith D (talk) 18:31, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Catmando999, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) 00:44, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning my talk page

What is the meaning of this? Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 01:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I vandilised it? Whoops, that was accidental, if I did. Hell, I didn't even know I was vandilising. Apologies. Hullian111 (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. Apology accepted. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 07:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And now, we wait for the mod to reply. Clearly looks like he jumped the gun a bit. Hullian111 (talk) 07:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Hullian111. You have new messages at MorbidEntree's talk page.
Message added 09:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) 09:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago Police Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grant Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Thank you for your suggestion regarding List of bus types used in London. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to). Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 22:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Zero?

I am confused. Is WikiZero different from Wikipedia Zero? If so I could put a hatnote so it is not confused.Chidgk1 (talk) 15:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stagecoach East Midlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gainsborough. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Rapier has been accepted

Dennis Rapier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis DF series has been accepted

Dennis DF series, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Dennis Enviro400 MMC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yutong TCe12 has been accepted

Yutong TCe12, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MCW Metrobus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reading Transport.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acklams Coaches has been accepted

Acklams Coaches, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 00:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bus articles

Hello, thanks for your help in improving bus route articles and adding the route diagrams Garuda3 (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Much obliged. Still learning the Routemap template, so any pointers or advice, let me know.

If you know a thing or two about routemaps, would be thankful if you could help with an (accessibility?) issue raised around Template:EastRider X46/X47: how, within the routemap MOS, do I distinguish between both the X46 and X47 when they split at Beverley Road? Do I just insert 'X46' or 'X47' in Template:Small text, or should I do the split point in separate red and blue lines? Hullian111 (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I hate editing those route maps whether it's buses or trains. I would have separate lines, though would keep them the same colour. That's just my gut feeling, I'm not sure if there's an accepted standard. Garuda3 (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, alright then, maybe some on the folks over on WP:BUSES may have a clearer consensus.

Again, thanks for the feedback; just put up a new(ish) image over on Flyer (bus service), may snap up a routemap if I can figure out how to fit all three routes onto one map. Hullian111 (talk) 20:19, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just had a thought - do you have an article in mind to include that template on? There are people who will search for unused templates and nominate them for deletion. Garuda3 (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prep work for a greater EastRider article I'll probably start off as a draft sooner or later. Bit shaky about notability at the moment, though. If it doesn't work out and gets deleted, then ah well, it was a good exercise. Hullian111 (talk) 20:48, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Police vehicles in Spain

The article Police vehicles in Spain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Largely outdated and incomplete WP:FANCRUFT - ideally, this should have remained a draft. I have no idea what sources I used when making this article and unless someone else wants to develop the article, I don't see any further development coming.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullian111 (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Ultra has been accepted

Alexander Ultra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BT Strikes

Hi, since you updated the article on the stagecoach strikes. Do you know if the BT Strikes are still ongoing as of this year. I haven't been able to find any information although the edits on the article say it has been over. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid that's out of my usual remit, unfortunately - I'm more focused on bus and fire service-related articles at the moment - but I might have a look later tonight if I'm not too busy. Can't say I've heard anything myself, although that's probably down to Hull not being served by BT. Hullian111 (talk) 16:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Leask & Son (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntientNestor was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet the threshold specified in WP:ORGSIG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Leask & Son and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntientNestor (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hullian111! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AntientNestor (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAVForth has been accepted

CAVForth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 07:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My "dubious" copyright issues

Hi there, I haven't been on the ball with this however you seem to have removed/replaced a couple of my photos due to copyright. These are my photos and I have gone through a process to verify that I also own the Flickr account which they were posted from. Hopefully this is just a misunderstanding and I just wanted to let you know. From now on I will post the originals (I did mark some photos for deletion) to replace them so there shouldn't be any issues. Josh r06 (talk) 09:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

I saw your message in the help desk. If you try the citation builder and add a new citation next to the old one it should fill in all the information including if it is paywalled or not. If not after you put it in you can run any number of tools like refill. Others are listed at WP:CITETOOL. That’s how I fix most of the errors I come across. It also has a tool to help you find any open sources that contain the same info. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:5412:4309:BBCF:A3AF (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent revert to London Buses route 142

Hello. I see you have reverted the edit I have done to add a new image to be more accurate on the operator. You're saying it could be deleted due to a "copyright issue", but I actually took this photo myself, I didn't steal it from the internet. My question is: Why? Why is it probably a "copyright issue" if I was the one that took the picture? Please resolve this as soon as possible. Thank you. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you had addressed the issue in the Commons file's talk page, I'd have sorted it out a bit quicker and possibly prevented the reversion.

Really, I'm just acting out of an abundance of caution. The lack of EXIF data on the image, lining up woth that YouTube thumbnail, as well as your past record on the Commons, leads me to be a fair bit suspicious. I've been stung a few times by images I've categorised that have turned out to be copyright violations, hence the caution and reversion; if all's well and if you can absolutely positively confirm the image is yours, then I'll be happy to reinstate your images.

Or either way, you can just hit undo on my edit. Hullian111 (talk) 11:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there.

I didn't know that I had to go to the images' talk page to confirm the image is mine. I also didn't know what EXIF data is so I didn't put that much data in as I didn't know, sorry. Yes, the image is mine and I took the photo on the 31 May 2023 at Brent Cross Shopping Centre. So is it ok if you can reinstate the image as I have now confirmed it is mine?

Thanks. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough then, now that that's solved. I'll see if I can get around to it in the next half hour - if anything, it'll just need a bit of cropping to get the person's face out of it, but other than that, think the matter sounds safely resolved. Hullian111 (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, thanks. I'll try to crop it out. If I can't, is it fine if you could?

Thanks. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't manage to crop the picture, is it fine if you can please?

Thanks. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cropping on the Commons requires the use of the Commons:CropTool. Don't worry, I have that, I'll sort the crop out for you. Hullian111 (talk) 12:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 12:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding onto that, I made that photo for one of my YouTube channels' (TheNorthLondonBusGuy) videos on the Full Route Visual on the 142.

Thanks. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 11:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, there we go, that confirms it. I'll sort that all out on my end. Hullian111 (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 12:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Switch Meteodecker

A tag has been placed on Switch Meteodecker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TartarTorte 13:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Leask & Son

Hello, Hullian111. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Leask & Son, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cleveland Transit has been accepted

Cleveland Transit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EastRider has been accepted

EastRider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SL6 image

I love how you changed the image literally less than 15 minutes after I uploaded it LOL! Thanks for doing what I was just about to do.

Also I got quite a bit of extra images that I’ll be uploading either today (provided I rush the upload before I go sleep) or tomorrow. Feel free to change the pics if you wish to.

Thanks once again! S5A-0043^Talk 23:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what can I say? At the risk of sounding rude to the original uploader, your photograph certainly shows off the branding aspect of the Superloop route much better than the original photograph used for it. I look forward to further uploads to sort categories for as the days go on. Hullian111 (talk) 08:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Go-Ahead London 2023.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Go-Ahead London 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MCW Metroliner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Dennis Trident 2

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dennis Trident 2, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

thanks for your edits!

Lynxano (talk) 19:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Buses route 486 has been accepted

London Buses route 486, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S5A-0043^Talk 05:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Humberside Police 2023 CIIR Crest.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Humberside Police 2023 CIIR Crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... editing 'Publisher' field in citations of Coach & Bus Week magazine after 2012 to not feature Emap as the publisher.

The following search (as of 24 March 2024) lists that 121 articles feature Coach & Bus Week with the publisher listed as Emap, based out of Peterborough. According to the CBW wiki article, Emap only owned CBW until 2005, then from 2012 onwards, the magazine has been published by Coach & Bus Week Ltd. in Peterborough, so it would probably be better off leaving the 'Publisher' field blank.

Unfortunately, it would appear I have made way too many edits featuring Emap where not appropriate, and thus, I am unable to perform those edits in a reasonable amount of time. A hint for editors to work out what to delete is that the problematic links are usually the ones that link to the CBW website. Hullian111 (talk) 12:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page in question is not protected, and you have not been warned or blocked for making these sorts of edits. In addition, you have made similar edits to other pages, so I am not quite sure why you need assistance with this page in particular. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}} with further explanation of the issue, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, right. Its more the fact that there's just so many pages to sift through and remove 'Emap' from the citation. I did think that the rationale was just to tag the single article and link to the search results and hope that will do; will probably try the Help Desk instead. Hullian111 (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I just re-read your question and understand better now. Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks is the place to make a mass-edit request like this. Primefac (talk) 13:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds Wikipedia meetup on Saturday 4th May

Hello there! Interested in having a chat with fellow Wikipedians? There's a meetup in Leeds on Saturday 4th May 2024, at the Tiled Hall Café at Leeds Central Library.

Full details here.

You're receiving this one-off message as you're either a member of WikiProject Yorkshire, you've expressed an interest in a previous Leeds meetup years ago, or (for about 4 of you), we've met :)

I plan to organise more in future, so if you'd like to be notified next time, please say so over on the meetup page.

Please also invite any Wikimedia people you know (or have had wiki dealings with) – spread the word! Hope to see you there.

Jonathan Deamer (talk)

20:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:CAPTION

Hi there. You have reverted my edit on London Buses route 486 for removing the date on the image in the infobox. It clearly says in some London Superloop articles that someone removed the date of the image caption, saying it's part of WP:CAPTION, so it needs to be removed here. I'll remove it shortly. Is that fine on your end? Thanks. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no arbritrator of these sorts of things (even though it kind of looks like I am with my big edits), so I wouldn't know; I don't tend to make any edits on the Superloop articles outside of adding the Wikidata stuff. I'm of the mind, though, that despite perhaps tacking on some additional length to the caption, dates do provide context to images (i.e. bus formerly used on the M1 pictured in October 2005). In that case, I'm not quite sure why they would be taken out by the other user. I'll rest my revert case, I just found it a bit odd, really. Hullian111 (talk) 17:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brighton & Hove Buses 2023 Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brighton & Hove Buses 2023 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equipmake has been accepted

Equipmake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 13:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Humberside Police

The article Humberside Police you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Humberside Police for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 01:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester bus routes Pages edit request

Hi Hullian, I would like you to help with expanding pages of routes 38, X50, 216 if you have information on them. Is that ok? TL9027 (talk) 22:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid that if you haven't checked my userpage yet, I'm rather busy at the moment. I'd be happy to have a look if I had some more free time, but my big final assignment is due early next month, so I'm going to have to focus all energy on wrapping that up.

I would, however, suggest going down the userspace draft route as opposed to plunging your articles straight into mainspace. You'll have the space to finish up your edits on them before putting them out there, and even if your drafts get rejected, you'll still get some useful advice from your asssessors.

To be honest, though, Manchester routes 38, X50 and 216 are ones I've never heard of before, and quite a few London bus route (non-major routes, bear in mind) articles have been removed for lack of notability, so you might be facing a slight uphill battle. Maybe tag in WikiProject Buses for the time being and see if they can offer some support in the meantime. Still might be able to come in for a couple of clerical edits, i.e. captions and image categories on Commons, though. Hullian111 (talk) 22:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a draft on Greater Manchester route 100. Can you expand it with extra sources to meet the Notability for it to be published? Besides, you may help to expand the Greater Manchester route 8 page.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Greater_Manchester_bus_route_100

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Manchester_bus_route_8

TL9027 (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TL9027 I won't lie, I've been mulling over my response to this for a little while. When I said 'I'm rather busy at the moment', that wasn't an invitation to spam links into my talk page and request edits to the articles that I cannot do at this point in time.

As well as that, please be aware that mass Greater Manchester bus route article deletions for failed notability have happened before and will most likely happen again. I support keeping up the 135 article because it has a degree of notability, hence editing it up to standard, but I'm afraid Greater Manchester bus route 8 was deleted in 2016 for a good reason: without the copied-in bendy buses segment (which is also completely wrong, Transport Designed states the B10LA Wrights were moved from the 135 to the 8 in 2005), there's no bones to the article at all. It's just an ordinary bus route from Shudehill to Bolton, which AFAIK, doesn't have the same staying power as London Buses route 8. Unless there's some notable and detailed history that can be dug up from archive sources, for example, it will most likely be deleted again.

To be brutally honest, the only good thing that can be salvaged from the articles are the updated images that can be used around the Wikipedia mainspace. I'd recommend you keep that up, because Wikipedia is lacking in Bee Network photos. Hullian111 (talk) 21:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I may wait for you to be active again to join in editing routes 8 and 100, hoping we may improve the articles again with your information and photos provided. TL9027 (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I can still barely see the '135' number covered by green TFGM logo sticker on some ex GNW buses under Stagecoach Manchester, I really can tell that GNW promoted that route well, leading to that route 135 very popular and gained adequate notability to let it quite likely to be kept on wikipedia, right? TL9027 (talk) 21:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yutong U11DD has been accepted

Yutong U11DD, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S5A-0043^Talk 02:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Hull Kingston Rovers season has been accepted

2024 Hull Kingston Rovers season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 12:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Metro (Liverpool City Region) has been accepted

Metro (Liverpool City Region), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S5A-0043^Talk 09:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Frankly terrible image"

I'd hardly call this a "frankly terrible image".

It would certainly have been better if it had showed the front of the vehicle, but that image was all that was available at the time I added it to the article. Other than that shortcoming, it's still technically better in every other respect than the somewhat murky print scan that replaced it, even after I'd tidied that one up a bit. Ubcule (talk) 18:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, you do raise some fair points, and considering the fact that the image was all that was available prior to uploading the Eddie Leslie shot, I do accept that my language was a touch brash for an edit summary. I just don't think that a severely-cropped preserved bus image would've stayed long if there's an era-appropiate 'murky' shot of a similar vehicle, though. Hullian111 (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Metroline Manchester

Hi, Hullian, you are so lucky having me. I am a Wikipedian currently living in Stockport. And may help provide photos for editing Metroline Manchester page or even routes which will be operated by them starting from 2025 as many routes currently operated by Stagecoach Manchester will be handed over to them. P.S. One of them being 203, serving my area, as buses on this route are actually dispatched from Hyde Road garage. TL9027 (talk) 19:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear in that respect. I'll see how things go in the trade press before I start making any major edits to the draft, as there... well, isn't a whole lot out there at the minute. Notice how I'm relying on the one Buses article over most of the other cites. As such, I'm not planning on submitting the Metroline Manchester article for mainspace until its closer to January 2025 and/or more information goes public (there's a document by Metroline with route and vehicle allocations for each depot going around, but I can't cite it because its am internal company PDF pack), but tips and advice would be welcomed for further edits.

The thing I'm trying to do with the draft is to lay it out like the London article. In terms of the 'Depots' section (or are they also called 'Garages' over there?), however, the only good sources I have on garage histories is for Hyde Road (even that source is marginal at best) and Sharston. The other depots (and Sharston, too) look like they've been set up in the middle of industrial estates in recent years, meanwhile, which makes their histories a bit complicated. At this stage, depending or not Metroline goes public with its route allocations (e.g. getting an article detailing them in Coach & Bus Week or routeone), I'm not totally sure if the section will stay ahead of publishing for mainspace.

I'll probably give you a shout if anything comes up. Give me a shout likewise if anything does, as, well, Bee Network news travels slow on the other side of the Pennines.

P.S. I will be at the Trafford Centre next Saturday ahead of the rugby, and while I can't make any guarantees that I'll be able to do it, I'll try to get some Bee Network-related photos at the bus station to put on the Commons. Hullian111 (talk) 09:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullian111:Another issue is Wikipedia lacks photos of Magic Bus in current livery. That livery is similar to the current Stagecoach local livery, with the Stagecoach logo is colored blue with yellow stars. To get them, you may use bustimes to look for their location and take one before it is too late (getting repainted to Bee Network livery, many of them will be acquired by Metroline Manchester as most of them are based at Hyde Road garage). TL9027 (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, I'll be nowhere near Oxford/Wilmslow Road come Saturday, so catching the Magic Bus fleet won't be a possibility. I'm, however, still planning a wider day trip to central Manchester and the MoTGM before the year is out, so I'll see what happens when those plans get sorted. Hullian111 (talk) 10:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Magic Bus fleet sometimes can also be found on bus routes which uses the Hyde Road corridor or even other routes. I have seen their appearance on the 43, 86,, 103, 192, 201, 203 and 250 before as most of them were based on Hyde Road depot. Just use bustimes and you may spot one near you. TL9027 (talk) 12:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingston upon Hull City Transport has been accepted

Kingston upon Hull City Transport, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 21:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for researching and writing this important article. I have added/linked it to various other articles. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 21:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Won't lie, this has been something of a passion project for a long time now, and given the earlier merger proposal, I wasn't sure whether I might go through with it or not. Given how the Stagecoach in Hull article looks now with its much-reduced 'History' section, I think its worked out quite fine enough. Hullian111 (talk) 21:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Hull FC season has been accepted

2024 Hull FC season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Royiswariii (talk) 05:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Stagecoach Manchester 2024 livery

Hey Hullian, just a head up that do you noticed that some Stagecoach Manchester buses received a plain black livery in 2024? I've created another category for that livery for photos of such buses to be categorized as I've just getting one this evening on the 23. TL9027 (talk) 21:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 Hull FC season has been accepted

2025 Hull FC season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Greater Manchester bus route 53

Hey, Hullian, do you know anything further about the 53? If yes, you may like to help editing it, thanks. TL9027 (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]